In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Similar documents
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

6.4 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Transportation Assessment

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

San Jose Transportation Policy

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Roadways. Roadways III.

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Hennepin County Transportation Department

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

Transportation, Parking & Roads

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

C C C

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

Sacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Route 7 Corridor Study

Building a Liveable Ottawa 2031 Backgrounder 4: Kanata/Stittsville

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Classification Criteria

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Traffic Improvements for the Transit Oriented Development District (TODD) Meriden Public Library March 11, 2014

NORTH TURNAROUND. Recommended Design: Expand the existing transit terminal

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

including infrastructure, transit and open space, Open Space changed approximately 50 to approximately 60

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

North Turnaround. Option 3: Best facilitates transfers from local to rapid transit services. High cost

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

GRTC Bus Rapid Transit: Semi-Final Design Phase Public Meetings: October 26 & 27, 2015

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Overview of Pulse BRT and transit network redesign

Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Project. Environmental Assessment (EA) Presentation Public Hearing June 22, 2017

Baseline Road Rapid Transit: Bayshore Station to Prince of Wales Drive

Commerce Street Complete Street Project from Good Latimer Expressway to Exposition Avenue

DUNDAS WEST-BLOOR Mobility Hub Profile

Centennial Neighbourhoods Transportation Management Plan Summary of Phase 1 Consultation. Overview of Issues

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

LONDON s. system TRANSFORMING THE WAY LONDON MOVES

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Item Description: Presentation and Discussion: Berkeley Rapid Transit Locally Preferred Alternative

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

Transcription:

The Last Mile Planning for Pedestrians Planning around stations will put pedestrians first. Making walking to stations safe and easy is important; walking will be a part of every rapid transit Accessible stations and vehicles across the rapid transit network. trip. The plan will provide for a continuous, attractive pedestrian network along the rapid transit corridors. Supporting Strategies Provide safe pedestrian crossings at regular intervals. In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations. A continuous, attractive pedestrian space throughout the corridor will create a place people want to walk. Explore opportunities for new pedestrian links when development of public and private occurs. Prioritize snow removal at stations and along the corridors. Minimize pedestrian wait times at station access points. Signalized crosswalks will make it easy to access stations that are in the middle (median) of the roadway. Sidewalk widths will be tailored to meet the needs in each section of the corridors. 26

Integration with Local Transit Routes providing feeder service to rapid transit should have frequency that is no more than half that of Rapid Transit. For example, the wait time for a connecting bus from a rapid transit station that has 5 minute service should be a maximum of 10 minutes. Rapid Transit 12 buses per hour Base Transit 6 buses per hour Base Service that duplicates rapid transit will be minimized. Rapid Transit Base Transit x x Routes that don t connect to rapid transit should not be extended or Rapid Transit x RT Station deviate significantly from a logical path just to connect to rapid transit. A Base Transit B Combined transit service will increase by 35% between 2015 35% and 2035. 27

Integration with Land Use Planning The London Plan The London Plan is the City s Official Plan and was approved in 2016. It is the playbook for city-building over the next 20 years. The plan focuses on growing inward and upward, with 45% of growth to be infill and intensification, and the majority of that growth will be in the Primary Transit Area. Rapid Transit is a key component of the plan. There are three key areas that will support London ON Bikes - Proposed Cycling Network transit-oriented development: 1) Downtown will be the focus of high density intensification and be held to a high standard for urban design and walkability. It will support all modes of travel. 2) Transit Villages will anchor the end of each corridor. They will become mid to high density, mixed-use areas, where Londoners can live, work and play. 3) Rapid Transit corridors will support appropriate intensification along the routes and encourage transit and active travel. Various levels of intensification along BRT corridors 28

Changes to Traffic Circulation A B C A B C At signalized intersections, traffic will be able to cross the BRT lanes and make right or left turns. At unsignalized minor streets and driveways, traffic will only be able to make a right-turn in or out. Traffic will not be able to cross the BRT lanes. Traffic that today turns left out of an unsignalized minor street or driveway will instead turn right and U-Turn at the next signalized intersection. U-turns will use dedicated left-turn lanes and a protected signal. Along Rapid Transit Corridors, moving people will be the highest priority. BRT will travel in dedicated, centre-running (median) lanes for over 90% of the network to provide reliable service. BRT median lanes will be separated from regular traffic by curbs and pavement markings. At major intersections, traffic movements will stay the same as today. At minor streets and driveways, traffic will not be able to cross the BRT median lanes. Emergency vehicles will be able to use BRT lanes and the rapid transit tunnel. 29

Intelligent Transportation Systems Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Transit signal priority (TSP) is a technology to maintain the BRT schedule. This can be achieved through: Passive TSP signals are timed to provide a greenwave for BRT. Active TSP signals will adjust to give a green light to BRT when behind schedule (see right). Wonderland Road North & Sarnia Road 30

Transit Oriented Development Transit-oriented or transit-supportive development means development which is designed to be well connected and integrated with transit systems, helps to make transit use more efficient, comfortable and attractive, provides quality pedestrian amenities to support the walk to and from transit services and generates ongoing demand for transit ridership. - The London Plan Walk Transit Intersections T Higher Order Transit & transit frequency Bike Shared Mobility Roads Orienting infrastructure for Station Plazas Green Spaces Institutional Sites O making pedestrian connections between transit & development Public Parks Other Open Spaces Designated Development Lands Development D featuring a mix of uses & densities Local Corridor Mixed-Use Infill TOD Contextual Mixed-Use Infill TOD Beyond 30 years Local Scale Residential Infill TOD Adjacent Transitional Infill TOD Major Mixed Use Redevelopment 31

Storage and Maintenance Facility The Highbury facility opened in 1971 and has been expanded four times. It is currently approaching capacity. The LTC currently operates two bus maintenance and storage facilities. BRT ridership forecasts indicate that approximately 27 new articulated buses will be required by 2034 to serve demand. It is anticipated that the current storage and maintenance facilities will be adequate to support the 2034 BRT system. 450 Highbury Avenue, Google Maps The Wonderland facility opened in 2011. It has potential space for 110 buses and currently operates around 50% capacity. The facility includes a number of modern environmentally friendly features. 3508 Wonderland Road South, Google Maps 32

Urban Design BRT Corridors and Transit Villages The Transit Villages and BRT corridors have the potential to: encourage transit oriented mixed-use development and intensified urban form; provide an enhanced pedestrian realm, including continuous pedestrian clearways, public spaces and amenities; provide infrastructure for active transportation; optimize tree canopy and green infrastructure; and provide flexible open spaces to encourage a lively community. 33

Future Opportunities There are opportunities to enhance the rapid transit network, beyond the scope of this study, including: Extension along Clarence Street south of King Street to meet future intercity High Speed Rail. Extension along Oxford Street East from Fanshawe College to London s International Airport. Convert some or all segments to Light Rail Transit (LRT) subject to future conditions, ridership demand, and cost-benefit assessment. 34

Next Steps in the Process Rapid Transit Master Plan (RTMP) will be presented to Council for adoption. Once adopted by Council, we will advance the design and conduct more public consultation to show specific challenges and solutions that mitigate negative impacts. We will initiate the Transit Project Assessment 6-month process (TPAP) with additional consultation and opportunities for your input. Design refinements, property and utility impacts, station locations and minor route refinements can occur as the design evolves. 35

Stay Involved What do you think? The City wants to hear your thoughts on the proposed Rapid Transit Master Plan. Let us know by: Completing a Comment Sheet and putting into the comment box tonight Talking with a project team representative tonight Emailing us at Shift@London.ca You can also stay up to date by following us on the social media accounts below. 2425 36