San Francisco State University ECON 560 Summer Midterm Exam 2. Monday, July hour 15 minutes

Similar documents
San Francisco State University ECON 560 Fall Midterm Exam 2. Tuesday, October hour, 15 minutes

ECO 745: Theory of International Economics. Jack Rossbach Fall Lecture 6

Building System Dynamics Models

Has Abenomics Revived the Japanese Economy?

The End of Hyper growth: Political and Economic Responses to a Slowing China

Midterm Exam 1, section 2. Thursday, September hour, 15 minutes

Indian Economy in Graphs. Arvind Panagariya Columbia University

Operational Risk Management: Preventive vs. Corrective Control

Code Name: Part 1: (70 points. Answer on this paper. 2.5 pts each unless noted.)

Mixture Models & EM. Nicholas Ruozzi University of Texas at Dallas. based on the slides of Vibhav Gogate

Dr Neil J. Bristow. 8 th WSD Steel Success Strategies European Steel Conference London, 30 th November H & W Worldwide Consulting

Wenlin Liu, Senior Economist. Stateof Wyoming. Economic Analysis Division State of Wyoming 1

The Velocity of Money Revisited

Growth Strategies and Dynamics in Developing Countries. Michael Spence Hamilton Project/CGD Forum Washington D.C. April 14, 2008

Very Persistent Current Accounts July Horag Choi, University of Auckland Nelson C. Mark, University of Notre Dame and NBER

The Ricardian Continuum Model

US imports from emerging economies have grown rapidly

Full Name: Period: Heredity EOC Review

Lecture 5. Optimisation. Regularisation

Comparison of urban energy use and carbon emission in Tokyo, Beijing, Seoul and Shanghai

Keynesian Macroeconomics for the 21 st Century Part 3: Demand Dynamics, Inequality and Secular Stagnation

Economic & Market Outlook

Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913

China from a Macroeconomist s Perspective. Kim J. Ruhl

Economic Analysis What s happening with U.S. potential GDP growth?

Introduction to Topics in Macroeconomics 2

Demographic Projection in Russian Interindustrial Model. Vadim Potapenko Institute of Economic Forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences

BBL Seminar. Handout. September 12, CAI Fang. China s Demographic Change and Implications for Rest of the World"

Tie Breaking Procedure

QSPS Conference. May, 2013 Utah State University

China s Policy on Population and Development. Li Jianmin Institute for Population and Development Economics School, Nankai University

Seven Lean Years Explaining Persistent Global Economic Weakness

Building on Kyoto: Towards a Realistic Global Climate Change Agreement and What Australia Should Do

Charting a Path to Lift Off? Understanding the Shifting Economic Winds

Energy Trends and Emissions in the Former Soviet Union

Labor Markets. Chris Edmond NYU Stern. Spring 2007

GUIDE TO ESTIMATING TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH USING SIZE FREQUENCY IN CATCH, EFFORT DATA, AND MPAS

During the Push What kind of motion does the puck have at this time? Is it speeding up, slowing down, not moving, or moving at a steady speed?

Understanding the interest-rate growth differential: its importance in long-term debt projections and for policy

The Global Economy: Sustaining Momentum

U.S. Economy in a Snapshot

LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Overview of Lesson. guided practice Teacher: anticipates, monitors, selects, sequences, and connects student work

A Hare-Lynx Simulation Model

Multidimensional Analysis

Physical Design of CMOS Integrated Circuits

What is Restrained and Unrestrained Pipes and what is the Strength Criteria

Bayesian Methods: Naïve Bayes

Chapter 10 Aggregate Demand I: Building the IS LM Model

Quantifying the Lasting Harm to the U.S. Economy from the Financial Crisis

Science Skills Station

Logistic Regression. Hongning Wang

16. Key Facts about Long Run Economic Growth

College/high school median annual earnings gap,

Chapter 4: Changing Economic Structures of the Asian Economies

Texas Housing Markets: Metropolitan vs. Border Communities. September 22, 2014

Government finances A long term assessment. Presented by Edwina Matos Pereira

In previous examples of trigonometry we were limited to right triangles. Now let's see how trig works in oblique (not right) triangles.

Pre-Kindergarten 2017 Summer Packet. Robert F Woodall Elementary

The Quality of Life of the People in Norway

R * : EQUILIBRIUM INTEREST RATE. Yuriy Gorodnichenko UC Berkeley

Economic Outlook. Peter Rupert Professor and Chair Department of Economics, UCSB Director, UCSB Economic Forecast Project

Using Markov Chains to Analyze a Volleyball Rally

FUNCTIONAL SKILLS MATHEMATICS (level 1)

Is International Family Planning Assistance Needed in the 21 st Century?

Congestion Evaluation Best Practices

Figure 1a. Top 1% income share: China vs USA vs France

U.S. and Colorado Economic Outlook National Association of Industrial and Office Parks. Business Research Division Leeds School of Business

EEB 122b PRACTICE SECOND MIDTERM

Oil Crises and Climate Challenges 30 Years of Energy Use in IEA Countries

More than half the world lives on less than $2 a day

THE BEHAVIOR OF GASES

Chief Economist s Report

Which student do you agree with (if any)? Please explain your reasoning.

Location Matters: Where America Is Moving

Lithuanian export: is it time to prepare for changes? Aleksandr Izgorodin Expert

THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROSPECT OF THE AQUACULTURE IN ASIA. Chen Sun, Shanghai Fisheries University, Economy and Trade College,

The Case for New Trends in Travel

Where are you right now? How fast are you moving? To answer these questions precisely, you

Keywords: Rights-Based Management, Fisheries, Voluntary, Experiment, Chignik

The Rise of China and Breaking out the Middle- Income Trap in Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A New Structural Economics Approach

Guided Study Program in System Dynamics System Dynamics in Education Project System Dynamics Group MIT Sloan School of Management 1

WORLD. Geographic Trend Report for GMAT Examinees

Support Vector Machines: Optimization of Decision Making. Christopher Katinas March 10, 2016

Issues in the Long-Term Economic Outlook for Canada

The Wisconsin and Minnesota Economies: What can we learn from each other? Noah Williams

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

The Great Convergence: China, India and the new global economy. Mark Thirlwell Program Director, International Economy July 2006

Report for Experiment #11 Testing Newton s Second Law On the Moon

International Economic Shocks and the Challenges of International Corporations

On the Allocation of Time A Quantitative Analysis of the US and France

The Future of Growth in CESEE

Macroeconomics Measurements

Chemistry 12 Notes on Graphs Involving LeChatelier s Principle

The Changing Global Economy Impacts on Seaports and Trade Dr. Walter Kemmsies

Market Update. Randy Tinseth Vice President, Marketing Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Copyright 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.

KEF-2016: Reforms for Inclusive Growth November 3 4, 2016

Agricultural Outlook: Rebalancing U.S. Agriculture

Top incomes in historical and international perspective: Recent developments

Gerald D. Anderson. Education Technical Specialist

Estimation of the Intrinsic Rate of Increase for Georges Bank Yellowtail Flounder

Transcription:

San Francisco State University Michael Bar ECON 560 Summer 2018 Midterm Exam 2 Monday, July 30 1 hour 15 minutes Name: Instructions 1. This is closed book, closed notes exam. 2. No calculators or electronic devices of any kind are allowed. 3. Show all the calculations, and explain your steps. 4. If you need more space, use the back of the page. 5. Fully label all graphs. 6. Use a ruler to draw neat graphs. Good Luck

1. (40 points). Consider the Malthusian model discussed in class, and described as follows. Consumers: Like to consume food (YY tt ). Each consumer supplies 1 unit of labor. Producers: Produce food using land and labor. Output of food at time tt is given by YY tt = AA tt ΛΛ θθ 1 θθ, 0 < θθ < 1, where AA tt is productivity level at time tt, ΛΛ is (fixed) land, and is the number of workers, which is also the size of the population. Population: evolves according to +1 = gg(yy tt ), where gg(yy tt ) is the growth rate of population as a function of output per capita yy tt = YY tt /. It is assumed that there is some subsistence level of consumption per capita yy such that yy tt > yy gg(yy tt ) > 1, yy tt < yy gg(yy tt ) < 1 and yy tt = yy gg(yy tt ) = 1. a. (5 points). Derive the equation of output per capita (yy tt ) and the law of motion of output per capita (yy tt+1 as a function of yy tt ) for this model. yy tt = YY tt Output per capita: = AA ttλλ θθ 1 θθ = AA tt Λ θθ Law of motion of output per capita: One way is to multiply and divide yy tt+1 by AA tt, and identify yy tt on the right hand side: yy tt+1 = AA tt+1 ΛΛ θθ θθ ΛΛ = (AA +1 /AA tt )AA tt = AA tt+1/aa tt tt+1 gg(yy tt ) gg(yy tt ) θθ yy tt Another way is to divide yy tt+1 by yy tt and rearrange: yy AA tt+1 ΛΛ θθ AA tt+1 tt+1 LL = tt+1 AA yy tt AA tt Λ = tt θθ 1 θθ 1 θθ +1 = AA tt+1 AA tt 1 θθ 1 θθ gg(yy tt ) = AA tt+1 AA tt gg(yy tt ) θθ yy tt+1 = AA tt+1/aa tt gg(yy tt ) θθ yy tt 1

b. (5 points). Suppose that Chinese economy, prior to 19 th century, behaved like the Malthusian model described in this section. The productivity level in China is fixed at AA tt = 10 tt, and the population growth function is gg(yy tt ) = yy tt aa, aa = 5 The land is Λ = 100 and land share is θθ = 1. Solve for the steady state level of output 3 per capita (yy ) and the steady state population level (LL ). Steady state output per capita gg(yy ) = 1 yy aa = 1 yy = aa = 5 Steady state population yy = AA Λ LL θθ 1 yy AA θθ Λ = LL LL = Λ AA yy 1 θθ = 100 10 5 3 = 100 2 3 = 800 2

c. (10 points). Suppose that at some time ττ the productivity in China increased by 50% (i.e. AA ττ = AA ττ+1 = = 15), and stays at this new level forever (once-and-for-all increase in productivity). Assuming that prior to the change, the Chinese economy was at the original steady state; calculate the immediate impact of the productivity change on the Chinese economy. That is, find the output per capita yy ττ, the net population growth rate gg(yy ττ ) 1, and the population size in the following period, i.e. LL ττ+1. Output per capita at time ττ: yy ττ = AA ττ Λ θθ = 1.5 10 100 1 LL ττ 800 3 = 1.5 5 = 7.5 Alternatively, using the law of motion of output per capita: yy ττ = AA ττ/aa ττ 1 gg(yy ττ 1 ) θθ yy ττ 1 = 15/10 5 = 7.5 1 Population growth rate at time ττ: gg(yy ττ ) = yy ττ aa = 7.5 5 = 1.5 The net growth rate of population is: gg(yy ττ ) 1 = 0.5 = 50% Population size at time ττ + 1: LL ττ+1 = gg(yy ττ )LL ττ = 1.5 800 = 1,200 3

d. (5 points). Given the change in the last section, solve for the long-run (steady state) level of output per capita (yy ) and the steady state population level (LL ). Steady state output per capita gg(yy ) = 1 yy aa = 1 yy = aa = 5 Observe, that there is no changes compared to section a. Steady state population LL = Λ AA 1 3 θθ 15 yy = 100 5 = 100 3 3 = 2,700 4

e. (15 points). Draw the time paths of output per capita, population growth rate and total population in China, that illustrate the economy before, during and after the change in productivity. Use the values found in previous sections to fully label the diagrams. yy tt 7.5 5 gg(yy tt ) ττ time 1.5 1 ττ time 2,700 800 ττ time 5

2. (5 points). Based on our analysis of the Malthusian model, circle the correct statement. A once-and-for-all increase in productivity leads to a. Permanent increase in standard of living and population. b. Temporary increase in standard of living and population. c. Permanent increase in standard of living and temporary increase in population. d. Temporary increase in standard of living and permanent increase in population. e. None of the above. 3. (5 points). Demographic Transition is (circle the correct answer): a. Transition from low standard of living to high standard of living. b. Transition from low interest rates to high interest rates. c. Transition from low mortality and fertility rates to high mortality and fertility rates. d. Transition from high mortality and fertility rates to low mortality and fertility rates. e. None of the above. 6

4. (10 points) The following table shows data for a planet of Aissur, populated by species that live for a maximum of five years. In addition, all the people are female, who are nonetheless able to reproduce. Age (from last Birthday) Population in 2017 Age specific fertility rates Probability of surviving to next age Population in 2018 0 100 0 0.99 100 (0.4 + 0.5 + 0.2) = 110 1 100 0.4 1 100 0.99 = 99 2 100 0.5 0.9 100 1 = 100 3 100 0.2 0.8 100 0.9 = 90 4 100 0 0 100 0.8 = 80 Total 500 479 Calculate the population at each age and the total population in 2018. 7

5. (10 points). The next table presents key demographic data for Japan, during the years 1955-2020. Period Life Expectancy Total Fertility Rate Net Reproduction Rate 1950-1955 62.80 2.96 1.278 1955-1960 66.41 2.17 0.980 1960-1965 69.16 2.03 0.944 1965-1970 71.41 2.04 0.963 1970-1975 73.28 2.13 1.014 1975-1980 75.40 1.83 0.875 1980-1985 77.01 1.76 0.845 1985-1990 78.53 1.65 0.793 1990-1995 79.42 1.48 0.710 1995-2000 80.51 1.37 0.659 2000-2005 81.80 1.30 0.626 2005-2010 82.66 1.34 0.646 2010-2015 83.28 1.41 0.680 2015-2020 83.99 1.48 0.714 Based on the above table, the Net Reproduction Rate declined during 1955-2020, despite the sizable increase in life expectancy. Explain how this is possible. Your explanation must utilize the formula of Net Reproduction Rate and make reference to the given table. The Net Reproduction Rate formula is: NNNNNN = 1 2 ππ ii FF ii ii=0 On the one hand, the increase in Life Expectancy means that more women survive through their childbearing years, which is reflected in the increased probabilities of being alive at age ii (ππ ii ). On the other hand, we see in the table that the Total Fertility Rate declined significantly, which is reflected in declining age specific fertility rates (FF ii ). The decline in fertility must have bigger impact than decline in mortality, for the Net Reproduction Rate to decrease. In the above NRR formula, we indicate the increase in ππ ii with one arrow, and the decrease in fertility with two arrows, to stress that the decline in fertility dominated. Indeed, the decline in fertility was dramatic, from about 3 children per woman to about 1.48 children per woman (about half). 8

6. (20 points). Assume that the aggregate output is produced according to YY tt = AA tt KK tt θθ (h tt ) 1 θθ, 0 < θθ < 1, where YY tt is the total real GDP, AA tt is the Total Factor Productivity, KK tt is the total physical capital, is the number of workers, and h tt is human capital per worker. a. The next table presents data on two countries. yy ii yy jj αα ii αα jj AA ii AA jj h 1 θθ ii h jj kk θθ ii kk jj 35 1? 2 2.5 Based on the above table, if the only difference between the two countries was productivity, what would be the ratio of country ii to country jj GDP per capita? Using the cross-country accounting formula, gives: yy ii yy jj = αα ii αα jj AA ii AA jj h ii h jj 35 = 1 AA ii AA jj 2 2.5 AA ii AA jj = 7 1 θθ kk θθ ii kk jj b. The next table shows how the average wage increases in years of education in a sample of countries. Years of schooling 1-4 5-8 9,10, Marginal return 1.134 1.101 1.068 Based on the above table, how would you estimate the human capital per worker in a country where the average education per worker is 13.7 years? Assume that human capital of workers with no schooling is h 0, and that human capital of workers with education level ee is proportional to the relative wage of workers with this education level. You only need to write the formula that you would use if you had a calculator. h(13.7) = h 0 1.134 4 1.101 4 1.068 5.7 9

7. (10 points). Assume that the aggregate output is produced according to YY tt = AA tt KK tt θθ (h tt ) 1 θθ, 0 < θθ < 1. We derived the approximate growth accounting formula for output per capita: yy NN αα + AA + θθkk + (1 θθ)h a. Assume that the capital share in both countries is 0.35, calculate the growth rate in productivity in both countries. Country yy NN αα kk h AA China 5% 0% 2% 2% 5% 0 [0.35 2% + 0.65 2%] = 3% Japan 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0 [0.35 1% + 0.65 1%] = 0% The growth in productivity was calculated using: AA = yy αα θθkk + (1 θθ)h b. Based on the above accounting, is the growth in standard of living in both countries sustainable? Briefly explain. In China, the growth in standard of living in fueled by growth in productivity, while in Japan productivity is stagnant. Based on the Solow growth model, without growth in productivity, sustained growth in standard of living is impossible. Therefore, we conclude that growth in standard of living in China is sustainable, but in Japan it is not (if the current stagnation in productivity persists). 10