STORM DRAIN STUDY WRIGHT PROPERTY 203 CENTRAL AVENUE GAITHERSBURG, MD

Similar documents
HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

WMS 8.4 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS

CHAPTER 4 SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage. Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.

MEMO. Schedule 'B' Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design Lakeview Boulevard Improvements Culvert Assessment.

The Basics of Culvert and Inlet Design

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Stormwater Management Pond Design Brief. Greely Village Centre - Commercial Phase - Ultimate Conditions - - City of Ottawa -

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

Appendix G. Alternative Solutions Details. Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING

General Information for Culvert Design

Modeling of Long Culverts and Stormdrains A Comparison of Different Methods

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

USING A LABYRINTH WEIR TO INCREASE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY. Dustin Mortensen, P.E. 1 Jake Eckersley, P.E. 1

SELBY CREEK SILVERADO TRAIL CULVERT FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

Culvert Design Basics


APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

Hillview Crossing Townhome Development

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

South Burlington Multi-Site Stormwater Infrastructure Assessment Site No. 2 Bartlett Bay Road Culvert

BC Ministry of Forests. March Fish Stream Crossing Guidebook. Forest Practices Code of British Columbia.

Sediment Basin 7E-12. Design Manual Chapter 7 - Erosion and Sediment Control 7E - Design Information for ESC Measures BENEFITS.

PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE REPORT

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES

VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE AND INCREMENTAL DAMAGE ANALYSIS AND MAPPING PROCEDURES

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Picture Spring Branch Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Report. Prepared for: Anne Arundel County. Final

3.0 Basin and Watershed Characteristics

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

19.1 Problem: Maximum Discharge

Stormwater Level of Service Study - Phase 2 Flooding Adjacent to Rock Creek

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Bass River Watershed. December The Cadmus Group, Inc.

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN STANDARDS

Driveway Design Criteria

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Unnamed Tributary to the Grand River Watershed.

Assessment of Soil Erosion at a DC Park Facility Spring Valley Park NW Washington, DC

Culvert Hydraulics: Comparison of Current Computer Models

Section 5: Pond Outlets

Assessment of Baseline Geomorphic Features at. Proposed Stream Crossings On The Proposed County Road 595. Marquette County, Michigan

Access Management Standards

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 002 EMORANNO. 001

Information for File # SEW

Bradford s Landing. Preliminary Plan Abandonment AB753 & AB754 MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek

APPENDIX H LAKE OKEECHOBEE FLOOD ROUTINES

Information for File #MVP MVM

Planning & Zoning Commission

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES. Lake Okeechobee & EAA Vol 3 A-i December 2005 Version 1 Draft 4

FINAL REPORT. Yonkers Creek Migration Barrier Removal Project Wonderstump Road Del Norte County. Submitted By:

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION

Lecture 10 : Sewer Appurtenances

Stormwater Management Report for the Macri Dixon Condo Block

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

2O-2 Open Channel Flow

W DR NE. Ranchlands Phase 3A2 Plan

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

ROAD OCCUPANCY PERMIT APPLICATION # Damascus Township, 60 Conklin Hill Road, Damascus, PA Tel Fax

City of Guelph. Hanlon Creek Business Park Stormwater Management Report Ponds 1, 2, 3 and 4

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California

STRUCTURE S-65 PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

JACKTOWN ACRES FLOOD MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ANALYSIS

ADDENDA B Hydrologic and Hydraulic (H&H) Study Guidance 2019

CSO/STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. HYDROVEX VHV / SVHV Vertical Vortex Flow Regulator

Fish Passage Assessment Report Mare Brook Culverts

Water surface slope extending up to 20 channel widths up and downstream of crossing.

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

GENERAL LEGEND 12"CMP

MEMORANDUM. TNC Fisher Slough Final Design and Permitting Subject: DRAFT Technical Memorandum: Levee Emergency Spillway Design

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN

Readington Road (C.R. 637) Construction

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT PROPOSED CULVERT STRUCTURES SR 194, SECTION 10

San Antonio Creek Spreading Grounds Rehabilitation Project Ojai Valley, CA

Massachusetts Stream Crossing Case Studies

Boston s Pilot Project to Measure CSO Flows Relies on New Technology and Scattergraphs to Detect Overflows

TM /AFM 88-5, Chap Underground hydraulic design Inlets UFC - Drainage In Areas Other Than Airfields

APPENDIX C. Fluvial and Tidal Hydraulics Report

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

1 PIPESYS Application

Skagit River Historical Flood Elevations and Peak Flow Estimates

January 25, Franklin Pasture Sanitary Sewer Cure-In-Place Pipe Lining Bid No Bid Date: 2/7/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

PROJECT NO. 093 MA 199 H C. FEDERAL NO. xxxx WIKIEUP-WICKENBURG-PHOENIX HIGHWAY TEGNER STREET, ALTERNATIVE 10 PROJECT IMPROVEMENT


CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

A LOOK AT EARTH SPILLWAY DESIGN AND EVALUATION AFTER MORE THAN 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

Outlet Structures T-12

22. Specialty Valves.

Hydrologic, Hydraulic and Geomorphic Technical Memorandum

East Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 15 Infrastructure Assessment Study

Presented by Fred Halterman, URS Jennie Agerton, URS

Transcription:

STORM DRAIN STUDY WRIGHT PROPERTY 203 CENTRAL AVENUE GAITHERSBURG, MD PRELIMINARY PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 120160330 LOTS 1-6 AND PARCEL A BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 12, 14, & 16 AND PARTS OF LOTS 13,15, & 17 BLOCK 2, OAKMONT JUNE 03, 2016 PREPARED BY: LANDMARK ENGINEERING, INC. 6110 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD SUITE 110 ROCKVILLE, MD 20852

~ Il ===A...A G, c. L ===========================================================: consi Iling engineers pi nnar s > surveyors Jun e 03, 2016 Storm Drainage Study 0 1 (30 I) 230 5861 Fax : (30 1123G-S884 E-f fall. larl clma' engr@aol.c(jm RE: Wright Property - Prel iminary Plan of Subdivis ion Prop osed Lots 1-6 and Parcel A being a Resubd ivision of Lots 12,14 & 16 and Part of Lots J3, 15, & 17, Block 2, Oakmont 203 Central Ave, Gaithe rs burg, Md. 20877 La ndmark Job No. 1326 Narra tive Statement The prop erty is curre ntly kn own as Lots 12, 14 & 16 and Part of Lots 13, 15, & 17, Block 2, Oakmont. The total property is a 3.68 acre lot with fro ntage along Central Ave nue and is zoned R-200. The site is within the M uddy Branch water shed. The Water Catego ry is W- I and the Sewe r Category is S- I. Existing Conditions: The property is currently developed with one ex isting sing le family dwellin g. The approx imately 302 foo t lot frontage is mostly forested but is brok en by a sing le driveway and cnlvert. There is a stream between the ex isting house and the roadway. Downstream of the prop erty th ere is an ex isting storm drainage sys tem whi ch conveys dra inage across Centra l A venue to a larg e wooded o pen space and on through the resid ential neighborh ood toward Frederick Road (.MD Rou te 355). A schematic ofthe downstream storm drain system is shown on the accompanying Stormwa ter Management Concept Plan. The N atural Resourc es Co nservation Service class ifies the soils as hyd rologic group B and D. T he hydrologic gro up D.' /\V'/ / ' ~:~ "J:< ~ / \ S U BJE CT P RO P E R~/ ;:. ~/\. '"' \ / /< r-. //~/ <\'\" ~\~ l\x ~\)//'\ \ \ soils are close to the strea m. The NRJ/FSD No. 420 1521 lo was approved for the property on Jun e 23, 2016. Thi s prop erty is su bject to the Montgomery County Fores t Conservation Regulati ons. A Final Forest Co nservation P lan will be required and will be coo rdinated with the Sed imen t Control Pl an.

Proposed Development: The owner wants to re-subdivide this property and develop an additional 5 single family dwellings with appurtenances. All 6 lots will be served by a private road which will cross the stream in the same location as the existing driveway. A Stormwater Management Concept has been filed to support the pending submittal of the Preliminary Plan of Subdivision. The property will be served by public water and public sewer. Drainage Area Map: Property boundaries and aerial 2 foot contour topographic information were obtained from MNCPPC GIS web page for the purpose of creating the overall drainage area map. The limits of the drainage areas were estimated from the GIS topography and field confirmed. The aerial GIS information was supplemented by a field survey which included general site improvements, topography, existing roadway features, stream centerline, top and bottom of bank. Hydrology: The contributing drainage area includes properties which are in three different regulatory jurisdictions. The percent impervious was taken from the zoning regulations for Montgomery County, City of Gaithersburg and the Town of Washington Grove and assuming ultimate conditions based on zoning code impervious areas. In addition there is a railroad right of way which was considered 100% impervious. The topography and land cover were evaluated starting from multiple points to find the time of concentration. The drainage areas and time of concentration assumptions were field checked to the ability possible without trespassing on personal property. WinTR55 was used to determine the ultimate runoff conditions for the 2-year, 10-year and 100- year storms at four different study points. Two study points model the separate drainage ways which enter from the east and join 10 feet inside the subject property. An additional study point was evaluated just above the existing driveway culvert. The contributing drainage area does not become 40 acres until below the existing culvert. The last study point is at the stream where it exits the subject property. TR-55 Summary See Appendix A, Pg 3 Tc Point Description 10-Year Discharge 100-Year Discharge A4 Junction SP1 & SP2 92.3 218.1 A6 SP3 at upper end of on-site 94.6 223.2 driveway culvert A8 SP4 at exit of property 101.1 236.8 Culvert Design: The existing driveway culvert was determined to be inadequate to pass the 10Year storm event without overtopping the driveway. A new culvert will be installed to replace the existing 18 CMP. Twin 36 inch HDPE pipes are being proposed and are modeled for these studies. A program provided by the Federal Highway Administration called HY-8 was used to evaluate the

culve rt. The attached comp utations s how the proposed c ulvert is ca pab le of passin g the 10 Year Sto rm event w itho ut topping the prop osed private street. The JOO-Year Floodplain Stu dy has bee submitted to the Departme nt of Pe rm itt ing Se rv ices for review. The attached Floodplain and Storm Drain Drain age Area Ma p sho ws the pro posed culve rt and the proposed 100-Year Water S urface Elevation. Based on the review co mments from DP S we do not antic ipate any cha nge to the pro posed floodplain. f~:~, Cha rles T. G rims ley, P.E.

APPENDIX A TR-55 HYDROLOGIC COMPUTATIONS

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 1 of 10 WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: DVA Date: 4/20/2016 Project: Wright Property Units: English SubTitle: Areal Units: Acres State: Maryland County: Montgomery NOAA_C Filename: P:\2013\1326-Wright-Central_Ave\dwg\Exchange\Out\DPS\Floodplain\1st Sub\Parts\Ultimate.w55 --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SP1(Upper) Upper Rch 36.74 74.327 SP2(BRNCH) Upper Rch 1.82 70.188 SP3(Clvrt) Lower Rch 0.82 80 0.193 SP4(Lower) Outlet 2.06 80 0.247 Total area: 41.44 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1-Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.1 3.99 4.77 5.97 7.03 8.23 2.57 Storm Data Source: Montgomery NOAA_C County, MD (NRCS) Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 2 of 10 DVA Wright Property Montgomery NOAA_C County, Maryland Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1-Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.1 3.99 4.77 5.97 7.03 8.23 2.57 Storm Data Source: Montgomery NOAA_C County, MD (NRCS) Rainfall Distribution Type: Type II Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 3 of 10 DVA Wright Property Montgomery NOAA_C County, Maryland Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr 10-Yr 100-Yr Identifier (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS SP1(Upper) 37.71 88.67 208.58 SP2(BRNCH) 1.77 4.55 11.42 SP3(Clvrt) 1.45 2.95 6.26 SP4(Lower) 3.39 6.92 14.69 REACHES Lower Rch 40.21 94.64 223.24 Down 40.20 94.64 223.19 Upper Rch 39.13 92.27 218.10 Down 39.09 92.26 217.89 OUTLET 43.23 101.06 236.79 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 4 of 10 DVA Wright Property Montgomery NOAA_C County, Maryland Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr 10-Yr 100-Yr Identifier (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (hr) (hr) (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS SP1(Upper) 37.71 88.67 208.58 12.10 12.09 12.08 SP2(BRNCH) 1.77 4.55 11.42 12.04 12.02 12.00 SP3(Clvrt) 1.45 2.95 6.26 12.02 12.00 12.00 SP4(Lower) 3.39 6.92 14.69 12.05 12.04 12.03 REACHES Lower Rch 40.21 94.64 223.24 12.10 12.08 12.07 Down 40.20 94.64 223.19 12.11 12.09 12.09 Upper Rch 39.13 92.27 218.10 12.10 12.09 12.07 Down 39.09 92.26 217.89 12.11 12.09 12.07 OUTLET 43.23 101.06 236.79 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 5 of 10 DVA Wright Property Montgomery NOAA_C County, Maryland Sub-Area Summary Table Sub-Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub-Area Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description (ac) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SP1(Upper) 36.74 0.327 74 Upper Rch SP2(BRNCH) 1.82 0.188 70 Upper Rch SP3(Clvrt).82 0.193 80 Lower Rch SP4(Lower) 2.06 0.247 80 Outlet Total Area: 41.44 (ac) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 6 of 10 DVA Wright Property Montgomery NOAA_C County, Maryland Reach Summary Table Receiving Reach Routing Reach Reach Length Method Identifier Identifier (ft) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower Rch Outlet 214 CHANNEL Upper Rch Lower Rch 163 CHANNEL WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 7 of 10 DVA Wright Property Montgomery NOAA_C County, Maryland Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SP1(Upper) SHEET 100 0.0300 0.240 0.205 SHALLOW 535 0.0370 0.050 0.048 SHALLOW 690 0.0360 0.050 0.063 CHANNEL 284 0.0408 0.030 3.10 4.80 7.172 0.011 Time of Concentration.327 ======== SP2(BRNCH) SHEET 100 0.0500 0.240 0.167 SHALLOW 285 0.0700 0.050 0.019 CHANNEL 83 0.0830 0.030 2.70 4.40 11.528 0.002 Time of Concentration.188 ======== SP3(Clvrt) SHEET 100 0.0400 0.240 0.183 SHALLOW 182 0.0930 0.050 0.010 Time of Concentration 0.193 ======== SP4(Lower) SHEET 100 0.0280 0.240 0.211 SHALLOW 447 0.0540 0.050 0.033 CHANNEL 55 0.0200 0.030 2.70 4.40 5.093 0.003 Time of Concentration 0.247 ======== WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 8 of 10 DVA Wright Property Montgomery NOAA_C County, Maryland Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SP1(Upper)CN directly entered by user - 36.74 74 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 36.74 74 ===== == SP2(BRNCH)Residential districts (1/2 acre) B 1.79 70 Residential districts (1/2 acre) C.01 80 Residential districts (1/2 acre) D.02 85 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 1.82 70 ==== == SP3(Clvrt)Residential districts (1/2 acre) B.225 70 Residential districts (1/2 acre) C.148 80 Residential districts (1/2 acre) D.447 85 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number.82 80 === == SP4(Lower)Residential districts (1/2 acre) B.692 70 Residential districts (1/2 acre) D 1.365 85 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 2.06 80 ==== == WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 9 of 10 DVA Wright Property Montgomery NOAA_C County, Maryland Reach Channel Rating Details Reach Reach Reach Friction Bottom Side Identifier Length Manning's Slope Width Slope (ft) n (ft/ft) (ft) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower Rch 214 0.03 0.0147 2 3 :1 Upper Rch 163 0.03 0.027 2 2.5 :1 Reach End Top Friction Identifier Stage Flow Area Width Slope (ft) (cfs) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/ft) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lower Rch 0.0 0.000 0 2 0.0147 0.5 5.110 1.8 5 1.0 21.376 5 8 2.0 101.910 16 14 5.0 947.324 85 32 10.0 5547.606 320 62 20.0 33755.431 1240 122 Upper Rch 0.0 0.000 0 2 0.027 0.5 6.522 1.6 4.5 1.0 26.325 4.5 7 2.0 121.150 14 12 5.0 1088.810 72.5 27 10.0 6282.923 270 52 20.0 37915.945 1040 102 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 4/20/2016 2:38:40 PM

WIN TR-55 APPENDIX A Page 10 of 10

APPENDIX B HY-8 CULVERT CALCULATIONS

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 1 of 9 Page 1 of 28 Site Data - Existing 18 in. Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data Inlet Station: 0.00 ft Inlet Elevation: 478.60 ft Outlet Station: 40.70 ft Outlet Elevation: 478.39 ft Number of Barrels: 1 Culvert Data Summary - Existing 18 in. Barrel Shape: Circular Barrel Diameter: 1.50 ft Barrel Material: Corrugated Steel Embedment: 0.00 in Barrel Manning's n: 0.0240 Culvert Type: Straight Inlet Configuration: Thin Edge Projecting Inlet Depression: NONE HY-8 Culvert Analysis Report

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 2 of 9 Page 2 of 28 Table 1 - Culvert Summary Table: Existing 18 in. Total Discharge (cfs) Culvert Discharge (cfs) Headwater Inlet Control Elevation (ft) Depth (ft) Outlet Control Depth (ft) Flow Type Normal Depth (ft) Critical Depth (ft) Outlet Depth (ft) Tailwater Depth (ft) Outlet Velocity (ft/s) Tailwater Velocity (ft/s) 80.00 15.67 486.01 5.267 7.411 4-FFf 1.500 1.421 1.500 2.324 8.865 5.598 94.50 15.50 486.07 5.169 7.465 4-FFf 1.500 1.412 1.500 2.495 8.769 5.837 95.00 15.49 486.07 5.165 7.466 4-FFf 1.500 1.412 1.500 2.500 8.765 5.844 123.50 15.20 486.16 5.001 7.562 4-FFf 1.500 1.412 1.500 2.793 8.600 6.241 138.00 15.07 486.21 4.927 7.607 4-FFf 1.500 1.409 1.500 2.925 8.525 6.417 152.50 14.94 486.25 4.859 7.650 4-FFf 1.500 1.406 1.500 3.050 8.456 6.580 167.00 14.83 486.29 4.796 7.692 4-FFf 1.500 1.403 1.500 3.167 8.390 6.731 181.50 14.72 486.33 4.737 7.733 4-FFf 1.500 1.396 1.500 3.278 8.329 6.872 196.00 14.62 486.37 4.681 7.772 4-FFf 1.500 1.395 1.500 3.384 8.270 7.006 210.50 14.52 486.41 4.628 7.810 4-FFf 1.500 1.393 1.500 3.485 8.215 7.132 225.00 14.42 486.45 4.578 7.847 4-FFf 1.500 1.391 1.500 3.582 8.161 7.251

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 3 of 9 Page 3 of 28 ******************************************************************************** Straight Culvert Inlet Elevation (invert): 478.60 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 478.39 ft Culvert Length: 40.70 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0052 ********************************************************************************

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 4 of 9 Page 4 of 28 Culvert Performance Curve Plot: Existing 18 in.

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 5 of 9 Page 5 of 28 Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Existing 18 in.

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 6 of 9 Page 6 of 28 Table 2 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: Ex. Driveway Culvert) Flow (cfs) Water Surface Elev (ft) Depth (ft) Velocity (ft/s) Shear (psf) Froude Number 80.00 480.62 2.32 5.60 1.45 0.86 94.50 480.79 2.49 5.84 1.56 0.87 95.00 480.80 2.50 5.84 1.56 0.87 123.50 481.09 2.79 6.24 1.74 0.88 138.00 481.23 2.93 6.42 1.83 0.89 152.50 481.35 3.05 6.58 1.90 0.89 167.00 481.47 3.17 6.73 1.98 0.90 181.50 481.58 3.28 6.87 2.05 0.90 196.00 481.68 3.38 7.01 2.11 0.91 210.50 481.78 3.48 7.13 2.17 0.91 225.00 481.88 3.58 7.25 2.23 0.91

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 7 of 9 Page 7 of 28 Tailwater Channel Data - Ex. Driveway Culvert Tailwater Channel Option: Trapezoidal Channel Bottom Width: 1.50 ft Side Slope (H:V): 2.00 (_:1) Channel Slope: 0.0100 Channel Manning's n: 0.0300 Channel Invert Elevation: 478.30 ft Roadway Data for Crossing: Ex. Driveway Culvert Roadway Profile Shape: Irregular Roadway Shape (coordinates) Roadway Surface: Paved Roadway Top Width: 10.00 ft Crossing Discharge Data Discharge Selection Method: Specify Minimum, Design, and Maximum Flow Minimum Flow: 80 cfs Design Flow: 95 cfs Maximum Flow: 225 cfs

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 8 of 9 Page 8 of 28 Table 3 - Summary of Culvert Flows at Crossing: Ex. Driveway Culvert Headwater Elevation (ft) Total Discharge (cfs) Existing 18 in. Discharge (cfs) Roadway Discharge (cfs) Iterations 486.01 80.00 15.67 64.20 11 486.07 94.50 15.50 78.89 4 486.07 95.00 15.49 79.29 2 486.16 123.50 15.20 108.22 4 486.21 138.00 15.07 122.74 3 486.25 152.50 14.94 137.42 3 486.29 167.00 14.83 152.09 3 486.33 181.50 14.72 166.73 3 486.37 196.00 14.62 181.36 3 486.41 210.50 14.52 195.97 3 486.45 225.00 14.42 210.33 2 485.75 15.28 15.28 0.00 Overtopping

HY-8 Computations (Ex. 18" Culvert) Page 9 of 9 Page 9 of 28 Rating Curve Plot for Crossing: Ex. Driveway Culvert

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 1 of 9 Page 10 of 28 HY-8 Culvert Analysis Report Site Data - Proposed Culvert (2 X 36) Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data Inlet Station: 0.00 ft Inlet Elevation: 480.10 ft Outlet Station: 48.00 ft Outlet Elevation: 478.60 ft Number of Barrels: 2 Culvert Data Summary - Proposed Culvert (2 X 36) Barrel Shape: Circular Barrel Diameter: 3.00 ft Barrel Material: Smooth HDPE Embedment: 0.00 in Barrel Manning's n: 0.0120 Culvert Type: Straight Inlet Configuration: Square Edge with Headwall Inlet Depression: NONE

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 2 of 9 Page 11 of 28 Table 1 - Culvert Summary Table: Proposed Culvert (2 X 36) Total Discharge (cfs) Culvert Discharge (cfs) Headwater Inlet Control Elevation (ft) Depth (ft) Outlet Control Depth (ft) Flow Type Normal Depth (ft) Critical Depth (ft) Outlet Depth (ft) Tailwater Depth (ft) Outlet Velocity (ft/s) Tailwater Velocity (ft/s) 80.00 80.00 483.36 3.255 1.449 5-S2n 1.149 2.057 1.365 0.970 12.778 8.298 94.50 94.50 483.85 3.749 1.981 5-S2n 1.258 2.236 1.512 1.066 13.230 8.750 95.00 95.00 483.87 3.767 2.000 5-S2n 1.262 2.242 1.517 1.069 13.245 8.765 123.50 123.50 485.07 4.972 3.392 5-S2n 1.467 2.531 1.781 1.239 14.132 9.512 138.00 138.00 485.82 5.721 3.977 5-S2n 1.568 2.644 1.908 1.318 14.550 9.841 152.50 146.66 486.31 6.214 4.349 5-S2n 1.628 2.700 1.980 1.394 14.833 10.145 167.00 149.21 486.46 6.364 4.461 5-S2n 1.645 2.714 2.000 1.465 14.917 10.428 181.50 150.97 486.57 6.470 4.540 5-S2n 1.657 2.725 2.015 1.534 14.976 10.691 196.00 152.36 486.66 6.555 4.603 5-S2n 1.667 2.733 2.025 1.600 15.023 10.938 210.50 153.54 486.73 6.628 4.656 5-S2n 1.675 2.739 2.035 1.664 15.063 11.171 225.00 154.58 486.79 6.692 4.703 5-S2n 1.682 2.744 2.043 1.725 15.099 11.393

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 3 of 9 Page 12 of 28 ******************************************************************************** Straight Culvert Inlet Elevation (invert): 480.10 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 478.60 ft Culvert Length: 48.02 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0313 ********************************************************************************

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 4 of 9 Page 13 of 28 Culvert Performance Curve Plot: Proposed Culvert (2 X 36)

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 5 of 9 Page 14 of 28 Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Proposed Culvert (2 X 36)

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 6 of 9 Page 15 of 28 Table 2 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: Proposed Culvert (2x36)) Flow (cfs) Water Surface Elev (ft) Depth (ft) Velocity (ft/s) Shear (psf) Froude Number 80.00 479.47 0.97 8.30 2.36 1.62 94.50 479.57 1.07 8.75 2.59 1.64 95.00 479.57 1.07 8.76 2.60 1.64 123.50 479.74 1.24 9.51 3.02 1.67 138.00 479.82 1.32 9.84 3.21 1.69 152.50 479.89 1.39 10.14 3.39 1.70 167.00 479.97 1.47 10.43 3.57 1.71 181.50 480.03 1.53 10.69 3.73 1.72 196.00 480.10 1.60 10.94 3.89 1.73 210.50 480.16 1.66 11.17 4.05 1.74 225.00 480.22 1.72 11.39 4.20 1.74

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 7 of 9 Page 16 of 28 Tailwater Channel Data - Proposed Culvert (2x36) Tailwater Channel Option: Trapezoidal Channel Bottom Width: 8.00 ft Side Slope (H:V): 2.00 (_:1) Channel Slope: 0.0390 Channel Manning's n: 0.0300 Channel Invert Elevation: 478.50 ft Roadway Data for Crossing: Proposed Culvert (2x36) Roadway Profile Shape: Irregular Roadway Shape (coordinates) Roadway Surface: Paved Roadway Top Width: 20.00 ft Crossing Discharge Data Discharge Selection Method: Specify Minimum, Design, and Maximum Flow Minimum Flow: 80 cfs Design Flow: 95 cfs Maximum Flow: 225 cfs

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 8 of 9 Page 17 of 28 Table 3 - Summary of Culvert Flows at Crossing: Proposed Culvert (2x36) Headwater Elevation (ft) Total Discharge (cfs) Proposed Culvert (2 X 36) Discharge (cfs) Roadway Discharge (cfs) Iterations 483.36 80.00 80.00 0.00 1 483.85 94.50 94.50 0.00 1 483.87 95.00 95.00 0.00 1 485.07 123.50 123.50 0.00 1 485.82 138.00 138.00 0.00 1 486.31 152.50 146.66 5.71 12 486.46 167.00 149.21 17.54 9 486.57 181.50 150.97 30.29 7 486.66 196.00 152.36 43.42 6 486.73 210.50 153.54 56.67 5 486.79 225.00 154.58 70.25 5 486.30 146.43 146.43 0.00 Overtopping

HY-8 Computations (Prop. 2 x 36") Page 9 of 9 Page 18 of 28 Rating Curve Plot for Crossing: Proposed Culvert (2x36)

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 1 of 10 Page 19 of 28 Site Data - Ex. 42 in. system Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data Inlet Station: 0.00 ft Inlet Elevation: 474.93 ft Upper Break Station: 101.45 ft Upper Break Elevation: 472.28 ft Lower Break Station: 153.67 ft Lower Break Elevation: 471.78 ft Outlet Station: 164.87 ft Outlet Elevation: 471.29 ft Number of Barrels: 1 HY-8 Culvert Analysis Report

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 2 of 10 Page 20 of 28 ******************************************************************************** Double Broken-back Culvert Inlet Elevation (invert): 474.93 ft Upper Break Elevation (invert): 472.28 ft Lower Break Elevation (invert): 471.78 ft Culvert Length: 164.91 ft Upper Culvert Section Slope: 0.0261 Steep Culvert Section Slope: 0.0096 Runout Culvert Section Slope: 0.0437 ********************************************************************************

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 3 of 10 Page 21 of 28 Culvert Data Summary - Ex. 42 in. system Barrel Shape: Circular Barrel Diameter: 3.50 ft Upper & Middle Section Material: Concrete Lower Section Material: Concrete Embedment: 0.00 in Upper & Middle Section Manning's n: 0.0120 Lower Section Manning's n: 0.0120 Culvert Type: Double Broken-back Inlet Configuration: Square Edge with Headwall Inlet Depression: NONE

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 4 of 10 Page 22 of 28 Table 1 - Culvert Summary Table: Ex. 42 in. system Total Discharge (cfs) Culvert Discharge (cfs) Headwater Inlet Control Elevation (ft) Depth (ft) Outlet Control Depth (ft) Flow Type Normal Depth (ft) Critical Depth (ft) Outlet Depth (ft) Tailwater Depth (ft) Outlet Velocity (ft/s) Tailwater Velocity (ft/s) 80.00 27.00 477.69 2.290 2.757 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 2.807 0.000 95.00 28.42 477.73 2.364 2.802 1-S1f 0.000 1.281 3.500 6.920 2.953 0.000 112.00 29.81 477.78 2.435 2.849 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.098 0.000 128.00 30.99 477.82 2.494 2.890 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.221 0.000 144.00 32.02 477.86 2.545 2.926 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.328 0.000 160.00 33.00 477.89 2.593 2.962 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.430 0.000 176.00 33.89 477.93 2.636 2.995 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.522 0.000 192.00 34.75 477.96 2.678 3.028 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.612 0.000 208.00 35.57 477.99 2.717 3.060 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.697 0.000 224.00 36.34 478.02 2.753 3.090 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.777 0.000 240.00 37.08 478.05 2.788 3.119 1-S1f 0.000 1.267 3.500 6.920 3.854 0.000

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 5 of 10 Page 23 of 28 Culvert Performance Curve Plot: Ex. 42 in. system

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 6 of 10 Page 24 of 28 Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Ex. 42 in. system

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 7 of 10 Page 25 of 28 Table 2 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: Downstream Storm Drain) Flow (cfs) Water Surface Elev (ft) Depth (ft) 80.00 477.25 6.92 95.00 477.25 6.92 112.00 477.25 6.92 128.00 477.25 6.92 144.00 477.25 6.92 160.00 477.25 6.92 176.00 477.25 6.92 192.00 477.25 6.92 208.00 477.25 6.92 224.00 477.25 6.92 240.00 477.25 6.92

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 8 of 10 Page 26 of 28 Tailwater Channel Data - Downstream Storm Drain Tailwater Channel Option: Enter Constant Tailwater Elevation Constant Tailwater Elevation: 477.25 ft Roadway Data for Crossing: Downstream Storm Drain Roadway Profile Shape: Irregular Roadway Shape (coordinates) Roadway Surface: Paved Roadway Top Width: 20.00 ft Crossing Discharge Data Discharge Selection Method: Specify Minimum, Design, and Maximum Flow Minimum Flow: 80 cfs Design Flow: 95 cfs Maximum Flow: 240 cfs

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 9 of 10 Page 27 of 28 Table 3 - Summary of Culvert Flows at Crossing: Downstream Storm Drain Headwater Elevation (ft) Total Discharge (cfs) Ex. 42 in. system Discharge (cfs) Roadway Discharge (cfs) Iterations 477.69 80.00 27.00 52.72 8 477.73 95.00 28.42 66.22 4 477.78 112.00 29.81 81.94 4 477.82 128.00 30.99 96.90 4 477.86 144.00 32.02 111.56 3 477.89 160.00 33.00 126.68 3 477.93 176.00 33.89 141.88 3 477.96 192.00 34.75 157.11 3 477.99 208.00 35.57 172.34 3 478.02 224.00 36.34 187.60 3 478.05 240.00 37.08 202.89 3 477.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Overtopping

HY-8 computations (Existing 42 in. System) Page 10 of 10 Page 28 of 28 Rating Curve Plot for Crossing: Downstream Storm Drain