Road Diets FDOT Process

Similar documents
LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Balancing Operation & Safety for Motorized and Non-Motorized Traffic

Broadway Complete Streets Project

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

What Is a Complete Street?

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

F L E T C H E R A V E N U E

Frequently Asked Questions

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Long Island Rail Road Expansion Project Floral Park to Hicksville

Rightsizing Streets: The Seattle Experience

Transportation Planning Division

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

San Jose Transportation Policy

Transportation Planning Division

COMPLETE STREETS A STEP FORWARD ITE District 10/FSITE Annual Meeting November 3, 2015

LTAP Fact Sheet. Abuzz word among transportation professionals. Kansas. Smarter, Safer Roadways: Road Diets for Rural Communities.

Commerce Street Complete Street Project from Good Latimer Expressway to Exposition Avenue

Defining Purpose and Need

C C C

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Appendix B. Environmental Resource Technical Memorandum. Assessment on Travel Pattern and Access Impacts

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Road Diets: Reconfiguring Streets for Multi-Modal Travel

Moving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

By Dan Burden, Executive Director Walkable and Livable Communities Institute

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Central Avenue Corridor Study FPID Number:

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

STANLEY STREET December 19, 2017

Completing the Vision

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Lawrence Avenue Streetscape Concepts August 30, 2011

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

After. Before ROAD DIETS MODULE of 9 Safety Proven Countermeasures.

Hennepin County Transportation Department

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Route 7 Corridor Study

Advancing Transportation Choices in Des Moines. MPO Environmental Roundtable January 9, 2018

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Poor pavement condition Substandard Intersections. / Substandard bike/pedestrian/transit accommodations. Driveway access Environmental concerns

Presentation Outline. Project/Study Purpose. Existing Conditions. Future Conditions. Understanding the Streetside. Similar Walkable Environments

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Street Design Workshop. Existing cross section Traffic volumes Examine adjacent land uses You design future improvements

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E. Town of Malabar Briefing (July 17, 2017)

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Off-road Trails. Guidance

Mark Malone, P.E. SD DOT

Boston Post Road Design Feasibility Study

Financial Project ID No(s).: and ETDM No(s).: and 14181

Monterey Road Complete Streets

SR/CR A1A PEDESTRIAN SAFETY & MOBILITY STUDY RIVER TO SEA TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

Angie Silva Kitsap County Commissioners Office Stef Herzstein, PE, PTOE Transpo Group Jessica Lambert Transpo Group

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Complete Streets: Planning, Policy & Performance

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

54 th Avenue North Complete Streets Concept Plan

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

Lessons Learned from Cycle Tracks (Class IV Bikeways) Design Practice

Transcription:

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Road Diets FDOT Process Humberto Castillero, PE, PTOE Roadway Design Office

Purpose of Guide Develop a statewide lane elimination review process Balance state & local interests Multi-modal needs Vehicles, Pedestrians, Bicycles & Transit Economic development wider sidewalks, parking More livable environments landscaping, aesthetics Identify profiles of issues & concerns Provide guidelines for development of the Concept Report

Stakeholders Applicant: the city, county, MPO, TPO, and/or private entity proposing the lane elimination project District Contact: coordinates District s review activities and serves as point of contact for Applicant District Review Team: formally reviews information, analyses, and design concepts provided by Applicant Central Office Contact: coordinates with District Contact and tracks Central Office s participation in lane elimination request review

Review Process Stage 1

Review Process Stage 2

Review Process Stage 3

Communications Material Initial meeting checklist Methodology checklist Application checklist Content for: Central Office notices Review comments letter Approval/denial letter

Application Package Includes: Formal request letter Approval by locals Public involvement Final concept report Funding plan* Implementation plan* Project-specific requirements* *as applicable

Goals and Objectives Identify potential planning, design, construction and operational issues in the lane elimination Concept Report Develop a consistent process for approval of lane elimination requests Allow for flexibility to balance multi-modal transportation needs along the corridor Improve safety, operations and aesthetic characteristics of corridor

Issue Profiles

Corridor Vision There are trade-offs & competing needs Bike facilities, wider sidewalks, and transit facilities On-street parking Landscaping Many design issues are interrelated All stakeholders must be identified early Resolution to some issues will take time Coordination is a must

Safety Posted speed Reduces speed 1 to 7 MPH Pedestrian exposure Decreases number of lanes to cross Pedestrian crash rates & severity Improves sight distance Bicyclists crash rates Dedicates space for bicycle traveling

Traffic Operations Existing traffic volumes (for 4-Lane roadways the ADT is less than 20,000) Eliminate/reduce queuing by installation of LT lanes Edgewater Drive - Before Increase in peak hour travel time Potential traffic diversion After

Pedestrian & Bicyclist Activity Bicyclists accommodation Bike lanes/shared lanes Width, buffers, color texture Expansion or construction of sidewalks Connecting major pedestrian generators ADA improvements and upgrades Curb ramps, bulb-outs, raised islands Opportunities for landscape/hardscape Franklin Blvd. - Before After

Transit Impacts Potential Delays Bus volumes and headways Preferential bus lanes Transit Signal Priority Bus stop relocations Near vs. far side Need for bus pull-outs

Parking Impacts Lane Repurposing Installation of parking lanes Width Sight distance restrictions Parallel vs. diagonal Parking for persons with disabilities Lane Repurposing Convert outside lane to on-street parking or bus lane

Environmental, Access & Emergency Environmental Issues Usually provide a net positive impact Shifting vehicle volumes to a multi-modal use Air quality improvements Opportunity for landscaping and hardscape Access Management Modification/elimination median openings Consolidation/relocation of driveways Emergency Evacuation Evacuation capacity Emergency response

Design, Utilities, Classification & Funding Design Variations/Exceptions Usually for lane and median widths May require sight distance evaluations due to landscaping components Utilities Generally not impacted if improvements are within existing right of way Functional Classification Can affect the degree of mobility/access function Cost and Funding Sources Low in cost, specially if coordinated with 3R projects

SR 693/Pasadena Avenue Project Location: City of South Pasadena 2/3 mile

SR 693/Pasadena Avenue Applicant: City of South Pasadena Purpose and Need: Economic Development Bike/Pedestrian/Transit enhancements Concept: From 6 lanes to 4 lanes, bike lanes, bus bays & pedestrian amenities Considerations: Lack of Funding for project Pedestrian crossing Business access Located in between jurisdictions Transitions to project termini Hurricane Evacuation

SR 693 Typical Section

SR 693 Concept Improvements

Outcome Outcome City council received public opposition. Opposition centered around impacts to vehicular traffic. City council voted to remove any reference to lane reduction from their Corridor Redevelopment Plan

Nebraska Avenue

Nebraska Avenue 3.15 Miles Before: 4-lane undivided urban arterial After: 2-lane arterial with Bike lanes Combination of: Two-way left turn lane Painted/textured medians Bus pull outs (Bus Bays) Construction 2007-08 (498 construction days) $11.1 million (initially 3R project)

Nebraska Avenue

Nebraska Avenue Before Condition

Nebraska Avenue - Pedestrian Mid Block Crosswalks Intersection Enhancements Median Refuges Sidewalk & ADA enhancements

Nebraska Avenue - Bicyclists

Nebraska Avenue - Transit Bus Lane Bus Stop

Nebraska Avenue Before & After Data Before After 2004-06 2009-13 AADT 17,900 15,000 Crashes/Yr. 174 71 Severe Crashes/Yr. 13 6 Ped. Crashes/Yr. 7 <3 Bicyclist Crashes/Yr. 5.0 5.6 * 59% reduction in overall vehicle crashes. 57% reduction in pedestrian crashes. *This change is not statistically significant. No bicyclist counts were taken before and after for comparison.

Nebraska Avenue - Benefits Pedestrians reduced crossing distances Bicyclists installed bike lanes Drivers improved LOS Reduced speeding/crashes by eliminating conflicts Made vehicle movement more predictable Provided LT pockets (corridor/intersections) Space efficient multi-modal use Economic Enhancement Livability Improvements Cost Effective 3R project implementation

Concept Reports Sample of Current Lane Elimination Concept Reports Status Location Description Features Approved SR 5 / US Highway 1 From 6 to 4 lanes Wider median, buffered bike lanes, landscape Approved SR 811 (Dixie Highway) From 6 to 4 lanes Buffered bike lanes, landscape Approved Hillsborough Boulevard From 6 to 4 lanes Buffered bike lanes, TWLT Median Approved SR 569/US Highway 41 From 6 to 4 lanes Buffered bike lanes, intersection improvements Under Review SR 9(NW 27 Avenue) From 6 to 4 lanes Outside lane repurpose for Bus Rapid Transit Under Review SR 7/US Highway 441 From 6 to 4 lanes On-street parking, bike lanes, landscape Under Review SR 804 (Boynton Beach Blvd) From 4 to 2 lanes TWLT Median, Bike Lanes Under Review SR 811 (Wilton Drive) From 4 to 2 lanes TWLT Median, Bike Lanes