Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Similar documents
The Who and What: Bus Rapid Transit Riders and Systems in the U.S.

How familiar are you with BRT?

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

From Disarray to Complete Street:

Item B1 November 19, 2009

WHAT IS BRT? Jack M. Gonsalves, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. February 22, 2012

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

Planning Transit Operations and Bike Sharing Denver RTD. Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning March 23, 2012

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

SUBJECT: Board Approval: 4/29/04

Transit Ridership - Why the Decline and How to Increase. Hosted by the. Virginia Transit Association

Caltrain Bike Parking Management Plan

Roadways. Roadways III.

2016 Capital Bikeshare Member Survey Report

June 2015 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SNAPSHOT

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

TriMet Attitude & Awareness Survey. November 2016

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

Agenda. US-1 Corridor Study and HIA Update. Pathway Diagram / Primary Indicators. Research Questions. Linking Multimodal Improvements to Indicators

Bus Rapid Transit and all that JAZZ September 30, 2013

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report January 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018)

Understanding Our Options, Lessons and Potential of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Graham Carey P.E., AICP November 2, 2011

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

Active Transportation on the Rise

Community Engagement Process

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

APPENDIX C Arlington Transit On-Board Survey Technical Memorandum

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

IMPACTS TO TRANSIT FROM LOS ANGELES CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION. Word Count: 3,386 (body) + 2,000 (8 tables) + 1,500 (6 figures) = 6,886 words

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Satisfaction with Canada Line and Connecting Buses. Wave 2

Community Task Force October 5, 2017

MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program. Community Meeting Route 66 - Brookline

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

Impact of Shared Mobility and Technology on Public Transportation

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit: Staff-Recommended Alternative

Developing a Regional BRT Network

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Mumford Terminal Replacement Opportunities Neighbourhood Open House. we are here. PHASE 2 Identifying and Evaluating Candidate Sites

TRANSPORT CHICAGO: STRATEGIC PUBLIC TRANSIT BUS RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENTS

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

Transportation in 2025

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

2012 Transit Study Randolph County

Caltrain Bike Parking Management Plan

UNC Transportation Fair

Alternative Partnerships to Provide Public Transportation. APTA Emerging Leaders Program Class of 2017

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

Seattle Transit Master Plan

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PESHAWAR Bus Rapid TRANSIT. By Engr. Haroon Rashid Ph. D Scholar, MS in Transportation Planning and B.Sc Civil Engineering

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

El Paso to Las Cruces Proposed Rail Service Estimated Ridership and Proposed Schedule

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

Transcription:

A Change in Accessibility and Convenience? Implementing BRT and the Impact on Transit Riders Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Project Background Greater station spacing for BRT 1/8 a mile versus ¼ to 2 miles Replacement or complementary of local service Decision on station locations/spacing case study

Project Background Boston Silver Line, Washington St. Las Vegas MAX Oakland San Pablo Rapid Cleveland Healthline Eugene

Boston Silver Line Washington Street Corridor Replaced Route 49 12 stops per direction Previously 20 High ridership increase along corridor Riders 16 percent were new to transit for that trip Over 2/3rds rated as excellent or above average for reliability Below average dropped from 27 to 8 percent

Las Vegas MAX Ridership increase from 44,431 to 132,718 within first six months Station locations Ridership Physical characteristics Landscape Location Distance

Las Vegas MAX Complements Route 113 Previously served 7,300 passengers/day Boardings where stops adjacent to MAX decreased yet didn t at other stops Operates 24/7 MAX from 5AM to 7PM Passenger satisfaction on MAX 40 percent travel time improved by over 15 min

Oakland San Pablo Rapid Replaced 72L (limited) because of poor schedule adherence, complicated fare collection system Stop spacing was ~800 feet With Rapid now ~2/3 mile Other routes operate along corridor (72M) End to end travel time reduced by 12 minutes

Oakland San Pablo Rapid Passenger satisfaction of Rapid Rating of 4.3 out of 5 for travel time Rated higher than conventional bus service agency wide Previously drove a car ~19 percent

Cleveland Healthline Aimed to improve service Frequency and travel time Reduce congestion Customer amenities 24 hour service to all 58 stops Station location Boardings for Route 6 Trip generators Easy/convenient transfers Physical layouts

Cleveland Healthline Replaced Route 6 Ridership increase of over 45% first year, another 9.8% first eight months of year 2 Travel time decreased end to end by 10 minutes Transit zone

Eugene Replaced Route 11 Stop reduction from 18 to 10 To operate six minutes faster, 11 to 12 minutes within 20 years Increased ridership 2,667 weekday ridership Route 11 vs. ~5,000 within first year Operating hours increased

Eugene On board surveys Compared Route 11 to Small increase (2.6%) among riders with access to a vehicle consistently ranked higher in customer satisfaction

Eugene 90 How did you get to this stop/ station where you boarded the bus for this trip? Percentage 80 70 60 50 40 Majority for both Route 11 and walked 30 20 10 Higher percentage of Route 11 walked ~80% versus ~47% 0 50.0 Walked Drove Driven by someone else Mode Bicycle Taxi Other More riders transferred from another route Percentage 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 Walked Drove Taxi Bike Dropped off Transfer from bus route Mode Other

Eugene How will you reach your final destination? Majority of Route 11 walked (~75%), (~55%) More riders transferred than Route 11 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 Percentage 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 11 0.0 Walk Drive Taxi Bicycle Will be picked up Mode Transfer to bus Other

Eugene How long will it take you to reach your destination? Inverse relationship occurred, may be due to need for riders to transfer Eventually a continual trip will be available 50.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 Percentage 30.0 25.0 20.0 15.0 10.0 5.0 11 0.0 1-5 minutes 6-10 minutes 11-20 minutes Longer Time

Eugene Spatial analysis completed Boardings and alightings for both Route 11 and Blue circles represent boarding/alighting of Smaller circles show frequencies for Route 11

Title of Individual Slide Title of Individual Slide Line 2

Eugene Majority of respondents that boarded and alighted Route 11 did so within close proximity to where stations are currently located The majority of boardings and alightings occurred on the / Franklin corridor route Very few respondents from Route 11 boarded and alighted the vehicle more then ¾ mile distance from Franklin corridor

Findings All BRT routes have experienced increases in ridership Service frequencies have increased No negatives for either replacement or complementary situations, depends on community needs Las Vegas (complementary) Consistently report decrease in OVERALL travel time Customer satisfaction surveys report high ratings for BRT