MEETING Agenda. Introductions. Project Overview. Key Study Components. Alternative Station Concepts. Preferred Station Concept. Next Steps.

Similar documents
Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Improving Pedestrian Access to Transit: The Sacramento Pedestrian Master Plan

4 Ridership Growth Study

Broward Boulevard Gateway Implementation Project, Downtown Walkability Analysis, & Joint Development Initiative (JDI)

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

SMART 1 Public Meeting #1. February 24, 2016

THIRD&GRAND. Public Workshop #1. Transportation Hub Area Plan. June 12, 2013

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

North Coast Corridor:

Good TOD. July 7, 2016 SPUR

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Stakeholder Meeting Handouts. January 2013

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

JOINT PARTNERSHIPS: Working Together To Support Light Rail in Santa Monica

Transit-Driven Complete Streets

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

CASE STUDY City of Monrovia: Leveraging emerging ridesharing services to expand mobility options

BICYCLE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE. Transportation and Trinity River Project Council Committee June 13, 2016

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

lowercase tod Rail~Volution October 22, 2013 Melanie Hare

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

San Jose Transportation Policy

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

summary of issues and opportunities

Advanced Transit Oriented Developments (ATODs) - Defined

KEARNY MESA COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Paoli Road Improvement Feasibility Study

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

Cotton Belt Corridor Regional Rail Project

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Where We Live and Work Today

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Arapahoe Square Zoning + Design Standards & Guidelines Task Force Meeting 9 January 27, 2016

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

Comments The Plan for Port Whitby

ST. JOHNS GOLF CLUB PHASE II FINDINGS, PHASE III RECOMMENDATION, AND POTENTIAL PARTNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Land Use and Transportation Town Hall September 17, 2018

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

Richmond Connects Visioning Update

Good Neighbor Plan Initiative Update. Transportation & Trinity River Project Committee 9 September 2013 Dallas Love Field Phase One Final Report

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

6 Screen 3 Analysis and Results

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Incentive Zoning. Zoning Ordinance Advisory Committee June 21, Pam Thompson, Senior Planner, Sustainable Development and Construction

Rail Station Fact Sheet DFW Airport North Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

I-20 East Transit Initiative

162 RESIDENTS ATTENDED 2 DAYS OF WORKSHOPS 15 TABLE DISCUSSIONS WHAT WE HEARD. Oakridge Municipal Town Centre Workshops PLANNING PROGRAM

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

MAKING THE CONNECTION: TOD A BLUEPRINT FOR SUCCESS

Perryville Transit Oriented Development & Greenway Plan

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

DeLand. DeBary. Sanford/SR 46. Lake Mary. Longwood Altamonte Springs. Maitland. Winter Park/Park Avenue

MIXED USE AND STREETSCAPE INTEGRATION Avondale Will Basil Juliana Zannotto

Caltrain Bicycle Parking Management Plan

Gerald Ollivier Lead Transport Specialist World Bank, New Delhi. Transforming Cities through Integrated Planning Corridor Scale

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Tallinn Region Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan 2035

Cluster 5/Module 2 (C5/M2): Pedestrians and Transit Oriented Development (TOD)

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Transcription:

City GARLAND Council ROADVISION Briefing STUDY VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 1 1

MEETING Agenda Introductions Project Overview Key Study Components Alternative Station Concepts Preferred Station Concept Next Steps Discussion VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 2 2

Project Overview VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 3 3

PROJECT OVERVIEW What is a TOD? TOD (Transit Oriented Development) Designed to maximize access to public transportation Typically consists of mixed-use development Incorporates features to encourage transit ridership Encourages higher density development within ¼ mile of the station DART Green Line - Baylor TOD VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 4 4

PROJECT OVERVIEW Regional Rail Plan Source - NCTCOG VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 5 5

PROJECT OVERVIEW Johnson County Rail Plan Future Rail Stations at: Sycamore School Rd. Crowley Burleson Joshua Cleburne (2 Stations) Source Johnson County Rail Plan Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 6

PROJECT OVERVIEW Burleson TOD Concept Plan Conceptual Plan Explored development potential for site surrounding future rail station Identified framework for basic infrastructure Established TOD district boundary Source Johnson County Rail Plan VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 7 7

PROJECT OVERVIEW Burleson Comprehensive Plan Source The City of Burleson VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 8 8

PROJECT OVERVIEW Burleson TOD Study Areas Secondary Study Area Primary Study Area VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 9 9

PROJECT OVERVIEW Primary Study Area Scope Transportation Station Parking Analysis Bus to Rail Transition Plan Non-motorized mobility (walkable / bikeable) environments Development / Market Future Market / Development Conditions Real Estate Product / Land Development Market Assessment Station Design Elements Alternative Site Concepts Alternative Station Concepts VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 10 10

PROJECT OVERVIEW Secondary Study Area Scope Development / Market Future Market / Development Conditions VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 11 11

Key Study Components VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 12 12

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Stakeholder Involvement Stakeholder Interviews On December 8, 2010 and January 13, 2011, interviewed key individuals and groups Interviewed stakeholders included Burleson and Joshua ISD s, representatives from the local development community, local business leaders, the Burleson City Council Transportation Subcommittee, and Johnson County transportation groups Interview questions focused on: Transportation initiatives and their status Development opportunities and acceptance Existing vision / expectations related to future transit, rail and TOD development VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 13 13

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Stakeholder Involvement Stakeholder Interviews - Findings Overall, the community is aware and supportive of future bus and rail service to the area Bus / rail service to downtown Fort Worth and DFW Airport are the key desire today Connections from the future station to Old Town Burleson, Gateway Station and the businesses along State Highway 174 will be critical Creating a walkable / bikeable environment will be important especially as related to schools Alsbury Boulevard improvements will be critical to continuing development in the TOD area VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 14 14

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Stakeholder Involvement Community Meeting #1 (January 13, 2011 51 Attendees) An overview of the project background, scope and schedule was presented Public ideas and comments related to the future TOD and station design were received through the general session, open house focus areas, and comment forms The public expressed great interest in: Maintaining economic vitality of Old Town Connecting the future TOD (visually and physically) to the surrounding community / neighborhoods Bringing historic character of Old Town to the future station design VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 15 15

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Stakeholder Involvement Community Meeting #2 (April 7, 2011 36 Attendees) Preliminary market data, transit station case studies, and alternative station concepts were presented for public comment The meeting participants generally expressed excitement about future rail service to Burleson and were interested in how quickly the service could become available The majority of the comments were focused upon details of the station concepts including: Need for wind screens on station platforms The potential programming of spaces that would be created in an enclosed station concept VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 16 16

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Transportation Overview of Transportation Tasks Review of current transportation system and previous studies Relevant station precedents / case studies Future bus system evaluation (needs, phases and costs) Future station parking strategy Bus to rail transition plan VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 17 17

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Case Studies Case Studies - Illustrate emerging trends in commuter rail - Give stakeholders examples to guide in TOD and transit plan decisions ADDISON LEWISVILLE AUSTIN VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 18 18

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Case Studies - Addison Town of Addison - Population 16,000 -Employment 100,000 - Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) member city Addison Circle Transit Service - Bus mode only - Plan for future rail VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 19 19

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Case Studies - Addison Intense mixed-use development Private/public development partnerships Adjacent to proposed Cotton Belt station. City worked with DART on TOD policy VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 20 20

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Case Studies - Addison Future Cotton Belt Regional Rail City-owned 6 acres held in reserve VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 21 21

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Case Studies - Leander City of Leander - Population 30,000 TOD Ordinance Smart Code - Form Based Code - City developed code in partnership with CapMetro Transit Agency Prior commuter bus service Red Line opened 2010 Private development plans under review but not advancing yet due to market conditions Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 22

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Case Studies - Lewisville City of Lewisville - Population 101,000 One of 5 stations on A-Train commuter rail line Revenue service began June 2011 Commuting in both directions Mixed-use TOD planned Residential component opened 2010 DCTA worked with City and developer community on station locations, architectural style, parking layout Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 23

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Case Studies Lessons Learned Small population base can support intense TOD (Addison pop. 10,000) Cities and transit agencies cooperate on TOD framework Long-term outlook essential Immediate success not guaranteedmarket conditions drive the train Commuter rail projects take 6 to 12 years from inception to revenue service. A-Train (DCTA) alternatives analysis began 2004, opened June 2011 VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 24 24

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Types of TOD s Employment Centers Residential Centers Mixed-Use Centers Parking Centers Bus Stop BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) Each of these TOD types has very unique product types, levels of density, trade area draws, and users/customers. Light Rail Station Commuter Rail Stop VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 25 25

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Market Opportunities National/regional prospects for both rental and ownership housing are especially strong with infill and transit-supported locations. Commercial retailers are struggling to maintain market share, as residential growth slows and consumer spending plateaus new retail locations require market-recognized amenities (e.g., public spaces, transit, urban infill). Job growth will drive demand for new office and industrial development and changing workforce environments will dictate space configurations and amenity levels again, transit and urban infill locations continue to attract most investment. Burleson Trade Area demographics/psychographics support demand for higher-density housing and support retail uses. Locational attributes (highways and transit) support significant employment growth. VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 26 26

KEY STUDY COMPONENTS Market Opportunities Two Study Areas could support the following level of development over the next 10 years: 1,200 to 1,500 rental housing units 700 to 1,000 attached ownership units (townhouse/condo) 280,000 to 420,000 square feet of new retail space 400,000 to 500,000 square feet of new office/employment space Old Town opportunities will primarily be infill in nature, with smaller housing, support retail and office/employment projects building critical mass West TOD district has potential for regional mixed-use center, supporting a mix of housing product types, support retail and extensive office/employment development VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 27 27

Station Concepts VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 28 28

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Overview Three alternative concepts for the development of the future Burleson Station were presented at Community Meeting #2 Each concept had differing implications related to the overall station aesthetic, accessibility, connectivity and phasing The following slides summarize those concepts Concept A Concept B Concept C VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 29 29

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Plan View VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 30 30

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Concept A VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 31 31

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Concept A Parking, Kiss & Ride, Bus Drop-off, Pedestrian/Bike Crossing at grade. Platform located between side rail and BNSF rail Station located within enclosed building under rail lines Building provides opportunities for restaurants, meeting / conference facilities, and other business functions Platform access - Elevator - Escalator - Stairs VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 32 32

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Concept B VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 33 33

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Concept B Parking, Kiss & Ride, Pedestrian/Bike Crossing at grade. Bus Drop-off at Platform Level Platform located west of side rail Platform access - Stairs - Ramps VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 34 34

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Concept C VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 35 35

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Concept C Parking, Kiss & Ride, Pedestrian/Bike Crossing at grade. Bus Drop-Off mid-level Platform located west of side rail Platform access - Stairs - Ramps VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 36 36

ALTERNATIVE STATION CONCEPTS Conclusions Concept A was overwhelmingly the preferred alternative for the following reasons: The location of the bus transfer facility at grade (lower level) decreases the phase 1 construction costs Pedestrian and bicycle access is simpler and more intuitive than in alternatives B and C The station building provides opportunities for economic return with restaurants, meeting/conference facilities, and other business functions Security is enhanced with an ability to limit platform access after operating hours VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 37 37

Preferred Station Concept VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 38 38

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT TOD Plan - Vision VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 39 39

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT TOD Mobility Motorized Transportation Active Transportation VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 40 40

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Station Plan VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 41 41

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Rendering West Station Entry Bus Transfer Point View Looking Northeast VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 42 42

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Rendering West Station Entry Bus Transfer Point View Looking Southeast VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 43 43

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Rendering West Station Entry Bus Transfer Point VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 44 44

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Rendering West Station Entry Bus Transfer Point Retail / Outdoor Dining VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 45 45

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Rendering West Station Entry VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 46 46

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Rendering East Station Entry Plaza View Looking West VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 47 47

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Rendering East Station Entry Plaza View Looking West VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 48 48

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Interior Station Space VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 49 49

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Section VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 50 50

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Section We will include the video here as a summary VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 51 51

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Intracity Bus Plan Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 52

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Intracity Bus Plan Route deviation, or Flex Route Concept operational in Dallas, McAllen, Abilene, Wichita Falls, and many others Combines Fixed Route with Demand Response Bus can leave fixed route upon request, typically up to ¾ mile Timepoints on fixed route portion Avoids cost of separate ADA paratransit service Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 53

PREFERRED STATION CONCEPT Intracity Bus Plan Business Model Options Contract for full operation & maintenance - with Existing Provider - with Private Management Firm Operate with City Staff & fleet Hybrid of above options Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 54

Next Steps VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 55 55

NEXT STEPS Implementation Components Master Planning Phasing Plan Land Use Plan Capital Improvement Plan Backbone, Collector and Local Service Systems Identity Elements and Amenities On-Site Development Urban Design and Development Standards Financial Plan Organizational Structure Development Strategy Property Disposition Marketing Strategy VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 56 56

NEXT STEPS Factors for Success Commitment to Long-Term Vision, Even at Expense of Short-Term Opportunities Encouragement of Higher Standards with Offsetting Incentives Balance Context-Sensitive Development and Appropriate Product Types by Location Public-Private Partnerships Will Be Necessary for Successful Implementation VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 57 57

DISCUSSION VISION STUDY Dallas, TX April 8, 2010 59 59