G W Trenholm Primary School

Similar documents
Meadowlake Elementary

Bernice J Causey Middle School

Jeremiah A Denton Middle School

Principal Mr. Shane Casey. Superintendent Mr. Danny W. Weeks

Principal Mr. Danny Stallings. Superintendent Mrs. Sue Reed

Southside Primary School

Monrovia Middle School

Myrtle Beach Intermediate 3301 N. Oak Street Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29577

MYRTLE BEACH ELEMENTARY th Avenue North Myrtle Beach, South. 2-3 Elementary School

Ocean Bay Elementary 950 International Drive Myrtle Beach, SC 29579

District Accountability Report

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

SCHOOL REPORT CARD District: FOX C-6 (050012) School: RICHARD SIMPSON ELEM. (5010)

Staff 89.6% of teachers hold master s degrees or above. The average number of years of teaching experience for our certified staff is 14.

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Arizona Agreed Upon Performance Levels Negotiation. Measurement Approach

1 of 16 4/4/ :28 PM

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

District Accountability Report

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Statistical Profile of the Osceola County School District

APPLICATIONS AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS DUE: October 28th

T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Page 1 of 5 Adequate Yearly Progress Campus Data Table. Final 2010 AYP Results

SALARY SCHEDULE

MSDE-DAAIT 04100(R)100 01/19

MADISON CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION SALARY SCHEDULE

Maryland State Department of Education Division of Curriculum, Research, Assessment, and Accountability 200 West Baltimore Street Baltimore, MD

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr. East West North

MADISON CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Accountability Report

The API Score discussed earlier is the variable that was explained. This measures the

Page 1 of 6 69% 28% 79% 55%

Northridge Local Schools

KNOX COUNTY SCHOOLS. Criteria for Cheerleaders, Pom Pon Squads and Dance Teams Selection and Participation

School Report Card

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. PARTICIPATION Headcount Enrollment Fall 2015 Percent African. Accountability System

Program Review. Computer Business Applications. Prepared By GWC Office of Institutional Effectiveness

Citizens of the World Charter Schools Los Angeles FY Preliminary Budget Assumptions

Medical and Dental Care in Hawaii

Student Safety & Discipline Report (SSDR) Validation Rules: Error List Version 5.3


THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT

Update on the Assessment of Undergraduate Learning Outcomes Collegiate Learning Assessment B.4 B.5

American River College Student Equity Disproportionate Impact Analyses Fall 2015

GIRLS SOCCER

Graduate Student Enrollment

New Jersey Department of Education. NCLB Report Data Layout Edition

University Of Maryland

San Ramon Elementary School. Travel Plan

Report on Adequate Yearly Progress

ST. THOMAS AQUINAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL SPORTS PROGRAM HANDBOOK

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

August 23, 2013 M E M O R A N D U M. Board Members, Collier County Public School. Dr. Kamela Patton, Superintendent ACT Assessment Results

Kingston School Committee Meeting Monday, September 14, 2015 Kingston Intermediate School MINUTES

2014 Entering Freshman Survey

Degrees Conferred Factbook

Athletic Participation # Participating # Participating Number of Participants on a 2nd Team on a 3rd Team

New Lebanon Local Schools

To:!Hunter!Schimpff!and!Audrey!Lane,!SC!Public!Charter!School!District!

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP s) MEDFORD BASKETBALL BOOSTER CLUB, INC.

LESS THAN BACHELORS BACHELORS MASTERS DOCTORATE AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG POSITION FTE SALARY EXP FTE SALARY EXP FTE SALARY EXP FTE SALARY EXP

LESS THAN BACHELORS BACHELORS MASTERS DOCTORATE AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG AVG POSITION FTE SALARY EXP FTE SALARY EXP FTE SALARY EXP FTE SALARY EXP

K.A.S.S.A.A Basketball Guidelines June 2010

ESOL Skills for Life Entry 3 Reading

Professional Golfers Association of Australia Limited

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018

Clarkson University: Report on Athletic Program Participation Rates and Financial Support Data July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017

Articles By-Laws Regulations History

Highlights. Employment

Algoma District School Board Hockey Skills Academy Information Package

Masters of Environmental Studies Demographics of Enrolled Students Fall Quarters 2010 to 2017

Edmond Public Schools Cheer & Pom Contract (Rules and Regulations)

Masters of Environmental Studies Demographics of Enrolled Students Fall Quarters 2010 to 2016

SKILLS AND ENRICHMENT PROGRAMMES 2017 / 2018

New Jersey Department of Education. NCLB Report Data Layout Edition

universities, which is at least an average grade of C+ in the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE).

City of Placerville M E M O R A N D U M. Steven M. Youel, Director of Community Services

The Osceola School District was awarded a competitive grant of $2.2 million from the Florida DOE to improve STEM teaching and learning in 2014.

WHO WERE THE MURDER VICTIMS? RACE-SEX-AGE

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Updated 11/4/2015. Carmel Clay Schools. Human Resources. Enrollment/ Demographics. Student Performance Data

Physical Education: Content Knowledge - Ets Home Health And Physical Education: Content Knowledge

Office of Institutional Research

BHASD Curriculum/Instruction Expenditure Detail

Athletics Participation Men's and Women's Teams

Kettering City Schools

Exploring Measures of Central Tendency (mean, median and mode) Exploring range as a measure of dispersion

Jaguar Journal. All you need to know about Jefferson Elementary. 5/16 Choir at the Captains game 5/18 Field Day 5/23 Fifth grade awards assembly

Capital Projects Plan

WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Salary Scales

2015 CANADA WINTER GAMES CROSS COUNTRY SKIING & PARA-NORDIC TECHNICAL PACKAGE

WRPS Summer Swim, Gymnastics & Tennis Registration. It s time to register for the Summer Swim, Gymnastics, Tennis Program!

The Buch Family Academic Scholarship Application

PROGRAM INFORMATION ENTRY REQUIREMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW

Transcription:

State Board of Education School Report Card 2006-2007 G W Trenholm Primary School State Board of Education Members Gov. Bob Riley, Board President Randy McKinney, President Pro Tem, District 1 Betty Peters, District 2 Stephanie W. Bell, District 3 Dr. Ethel H. Hall, Vice President Emerita, District 4 Ella B. Bell, District 5 David F. Byers Jr., Vice President, District 6 Sandra Ray, District 7 Dr. Mary J. Caylor, District 8 Joseph B. Morton, Superintendent of Education Principal Mrs. Mary K. Smith Superintendent Dr. Joe D. Walters School Board Members Mr. Steve Carpenter Dr. Mark Mcilwain Mrs. Betty Belue Ms. Betsy Gardiner Mr. Fred Williams G W Trenholm Primary School 601 Joe Wheeler Hwy Tuscumbia,AL 35674 (256)389-2940 Report cards are prepared by the Alabama Department of Education. For more information including a glossary of terms, grading scales, and detailed data, visit the SDE Web site Accountability Reporting System at: http://www.alsde.edu/accountability/preaccountability.asp (EL) 201-0040

GENERAL INFORMATION 2 (EL) 201-0040

3 (EL) 201-0040 GENERAL INFORMATION Average Daily Membership This is the average number of students on attendance rolls during the first 20 days of school after Labor Day. School Year ADM 2006-2007 343.0 2005-2006 362.1 2004-2005 333.5 Average Daily Attendance This is the percent of students that attend school each day. Students Eligible for Free or Reduced Price Meals This is the percent of students that applied for and were approved as reported on the Fall Attendance Report. It is an indicator of poverty. Technology Internet access and computer use in schools. A lower number indicates greater student access to technology.

GENERAL INFORMATION 4 (EL) 201-0040 Teacher Qualifications This table shows the percentage of teachers holding each level of certification as issued by the Alabama Department of Education for this school year. Six Year (Class AA) through Doctorate Master's Degree (Class A) Bachelor's Degree (Class B) 7.1 % 78.6 % 14.3 % Due to rounding, totals may not equal 100% age of all Elementary and Secondary Teachers with Alternative or Emergency Certification 0.0 % Safety & Discipline The following table shows the types of discipline problems that have occurred and what actions were taken. Action Taken Incident Type Incidents Reported Suspension Expulsion Alternative School Drug Related 0 0 0 0 Assault 0 0 0 0 Weapon Related 0 0 0 0 Bomb Threat 0 0 0 0 As required by federal law, students must be allowed to transfer to another school if their school is identified as persistently dangerous. Is this a transfer option school? NO Staffing The following full and part time professionals were employed this year. School System State Teacher 23.5 97.6 49,527.5 Counselor 0.0 4.0 1,839.2 Librarian 1.0 4.0 1,422.2 Administrator 1.0 5.5 2,642.2 Nurse 0.5 3.0 979.2 Instruction Assistant 8.0 14.0 6,962.7 Other 2.0 8.8 2,470.1 Support Staff 7.5 49.0 29,448.8

GENERAL INFORMATION 5 (EL) 201-0040 Highly Qualified Teachers This is the percent of teachers that are teaching and the percent of classes taught in a core subject for which the teacher is highly qualified by the State of Alabama as required by the federal legislation known as No Child Left Behind. CLASSES Total Classes age Taught By Highly Qualified Teachers age Not Taught By Highly Qualified Teachers SCHOOL 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 Elementary 1 88 100.0 95.5 0.0 4.5 Secondary No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Total No Data 88 No Data 95.5 No Data 4.5 SYSTEM 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 Elementary 92 180 100.0 97.8 0.0 2.2 Secondary 120 136 98.3 97.8 1.7 2.2 Total 210 316 99.0 97.8 1.0 2.2 STATE 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 Elementary 97,672 100,084 94.9 97.5 5.1 2.5 Secondary 60,824 59,426 84.2 91.3 15.8 8.7 Total 158,496 159,510 90.8 95.2 9.2 4.8 TEACHERS Total Teachers age Highly Qualified Teachers age Not Highly Qualified Teachers SCHOOL 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 Elementary 1 22 100.0 95.5 0.0 4.5 Secondary No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data Total No Data 22 No Data 95.5 No Data 4.5 SYSTEM 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 Elementary 24 45 100.0 97.8 0.0 2.2 Secondary 32 35 96.9 97.1 3.1 2.9 Total 56 80 98.2 97.5 1.8 2.5 STATE 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 Elementary 24,219 23,610 93.4 96.6 6.6 3.4 Secondary 15,533 14,862 80.6 87.4 19.4 12.6 Total 39,752 38,472 88.4 93.0 11.6 7.0

STATE ACCOUNTABILITY 6 (EL) 201-0040 Adequate Yearly Progress Status for 2007-2008 Based on School Year 2006-2007 Data State Accountability in Alabama is based on the federal law known as the "No Child Left Behind" Act (NCLB) of 2001. NCLB uses the term Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) to describe whether a school or system has met its annual accountability goals. COMPONENTS OF AYP Annual Goals for Reading and Mathematics age of students scoring proficient or higher Participation Rate age of students participating in assessments Additional Academic Indicators Attendance Graduation Rate ASSESSMENTS USED IN DETERMINING AYP Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) Reading: Grades 3-8 Mathematics: Grades 3-8 Alabama High School Graduation Exam (AHSGE) Reading: Grade 11 Mathematics: Grade 11 Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA) Reading: Grades 3-8 and 11 Mathematics: Grades 3-8 and 11 For more detail on the Alabama Accountability System, please reference the Accountability Interpretive Guide which can be found on the SDE Web site: http://www.alsde.edu Select the Accountability Reporting option on the home page. Then request the School Year: 2006-2007 Report: 2007 Interpretive Guide for State Accountability.

7 (EL) 201-0040 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY Adequate Yearly Progress Status for 2007-2008 Based on School Year 2006-2007 Data (R E Thompson Intermediate School) This school met 17 AYP goals out of 17 (100.00%). AYP Status: Made AYP School Improvement Status: Not in School Improvement Reading AYP Status:Made AYP Reading School Improvement Status:Not in School Improvement Student Group Participation Met Participation Proficiency Index Met Proficiency Goal = 95% Goal Goal = 0.00 Goal All Students 99 Yes 19.56 Yes Special Education 94 N/A -1.62 N/A American Indian/Alaskan No Data No Data No Data No Data Asian/Pacific Islander No Data No Data No Data No Data Black 99 Yes 16.76 Yes Hispanic ~ N/A ~ N/A White 99 Yes 20.27 Yes Limited English Proficient No Data No Data No Data No Data Free/Reduced Meals 99 Yes 16.19 Yes Mathematics AYP Status:Made AYP Mathematics School Improvement Status:Not in School Improvement Student Group Participation Met Participation Proficiency Index Met Proficiency Goal = 95% Goal Goal = 0.00 Goal All Students 99 Yes 23.30 Yes Special Education 94 N/A -4.69 N/A American Indian/Alaskan No Data No Data No Data No Data Asian/Pacific Islander No Data No Data No Data No Data Black 99 Yes 18.89 Yes Hispanic ~ N/A ~ N/A White 98 Yes 24.42 Yes Limited English Proficient No Data No Data No Data No Data Free/Reduced Meals 99 Yes 19.64 Yes ~ Fewer than 10 students * Small school rule for proficiency (N2) Small school rule for participation (UA) Uniform Averaging (SH) Safe Harbor (CI) Confidence Interval (IM) Improvement (N/A) Not applicable (for subgroups), fewer than 40 students (2%) Proficiency adjustment made for students with disabilities Additional Academic Indicators AYP Status:Made AYP School Improvement Status:Not in School Improvement Student Group Attendance Rate Attendance Rate Met Attendance Graduation Rate Graduation Rate Met Graduation Goal = 95% Previous Year AYP Goal = 90% Previous Year Rate AYP All Students 100 96 Yes N/A N/A N/A (IM) Improvement (N/A) Not applicable

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) provides an assessment of students' mastery of the content contained in the Alabama Courses of Study. The ARMT was given in grades three through eight. Number Tested Tested* SCHOOL Reading All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 123 98.4 0.0 7.3 35.8 56.9 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 91.7 0.0 54.5 36.4 9.1 Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23 95.8 0.0 8.7 43.5 47.8 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 99 99.0 0.0 7.1 33.3 59.6 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 61 98.4 0.0 9.8 29.5 60.7 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 62 98.4 0.0 4.8 41.9 53.2 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 63 98.4 0.0 9.5 47.6 42.9 Reading All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 118 100.0 0.0 7.6 28.8 63.6 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 26 100.0 0.0 7.7 42.3 50.0 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 92 100.0 0.0 7.6 25.0 67.4 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 67 100.0 0.0 10.4 37.3 52.2 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 100.0 0.0 3.9 17.6 78.4 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 46 100.0 0.0 10.9 41.3 47.8 Reading SYSTEM Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV Not Partially Not Partially Number Tested Tested* All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 94 98.9 1.1 14.9 35.1 48.9 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 90.9 0.0 80.0 10.0 10.0 Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23 100.0 4.3 21.7 47.8 26.1 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 71 98.6 0.0 12.7 31.0 56.3 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43 97.7 2.3 25.6 32.6 39.5 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 100.0 0.0 5.9 37.3 56.9 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 100.0 2.0 23.5 41.2 33.3 *** Less than 10 students tested * age of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable Note: Some students took an alternate assessment in lieu of this assessment 8 (EL) 201-0040

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) provides an assessment of students' mastery of the content contained in the Alabama Courses of Study. The ARMT was given in grades three through eight. Number Tested Tested* SCHOOL Reading All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 122 99.2 0.0 17.2 27.0 55.7 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** Asian/Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 29 100.0 0.0 24.1 27.6 48.3 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 92 98.9 0.0 15.2 26.1 58.7 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 68 98.6 0.0 25.0 27.9 47.1 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 54 100.0 0.0 7.4 25.9 66.7 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 58 98.3 0.0 22.4 36.2 41.4 Reading All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 115 97.5 1.7 18.3 28.7 51.3 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 90.9 20.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 42 100.0 4.8 28.6 38.1 28.6 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 73 96.1 0.0 12.3 23.3 64.4 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 96.2 2.0 25.5 33.3 39.2 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 64 98.5 1.6 12.5 25.0 60.9 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 54 94.7 3.7 22.2 35.2 38.9 Reading SYSTEM Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV Not Partially Not Partially Number Tested Tested* All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 114 97.4 0.9 20.2 38.6 40.4 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 84.6 9.1 72.7 18.2 0.0 Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 34 100.0 0.0 35.3 50.0 14.7 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 79 96.3 1.3 12.7 34.2 51.9 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 65 95.6 0.0 21.5 41.5 36.9 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 49 100.0 2.0 18.4 34.7 44.9 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43 93.5 0.0 32.6 48.8 18.6 *** Less than 10 students tested * age of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable Note: Some students took an alternate assessment in lieu of this assessment 9 (EL) 201-0040

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) provides an assessment of students' mastery of the content contained in the Alabama Courses of Study. The ARMT was given in grades three through eight. Number Tested Tested* SCHOOL Mathematics All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 122 97.6 4.1 7.4 31.1 57.4 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 91.7 36.4 27.3 9.1 27.3 Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23 95.8 4.3 8.7 52.2 34.8 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 98 98.0 4.1 7.1 26.5 62.2 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 60 96.8 5.0 6.7 26.7 61.7 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 62 98.4 3.2 8.1 35.5 53.2 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 63 98.4 3.2 12.7 41.3 42.9 Mathematics All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 118 100.0 0.0 19.5 29.7 50.8 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 26 100.0 0.0 30.8 50.0 19.2 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 92 100.0 0.0 16.3 23.9 59.8 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 67 100.0 0.0 22.4 31.3 46.3 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 100.0 0.0 15.7 27.5 56.9 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 46 100.0 0.0 30.4 32.6 37.0 Mathematics SYSTEM Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV Not Partially Not Partially Number Tested Tested* All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 93 97.9 0.0 29.0 39.8 31.2 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 90.9 0.0 80.0 20.0 0.0 Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23 100.0 0.0 47.8 34.8 17.4 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 70 97.2 0.0 22.9 41.4 35.7 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43 97.7 0.0 44.2 23.3 32.6 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 50 98.0 0.0 16.0 54.0 30.0 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 50 98.0 0.0 38.0 44.0 18.0 *** Less than 10 students tested * age of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable Note: Some students took an alternate assessment in lieu of this assessment 10 (EL) 201-0040

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) provides an assessment of students' mastery of the content contained in the Alabama Courses of Study. The ARMT was given in grades three through eight. Number Tested Tested* SCHOOL Mathematics All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 121 98.4 0.0 30.6 50.4 19.0 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** Asian/Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 29 100.0 0.0 37.9 48.3 13.8 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 91 97.8 0.0 28.6 50.5 20.9 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 67 97.1 0.0 35.8 44.8 19.4 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 54 100.0 0.0 24.1 57.4 18.5 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 58 98.3 0.0 37.9 48.3 13.8 Mathematics All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 115 97.5 0.0 38.3 43.5 18.3 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10 90.9 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 42 100.0 0.0 57.1 33.3 9.5 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 73 96.1 0.0 27.4 49.3 23.3 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 51 96.2 0.0 45.1 35.3 19.6 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 64 98.5 0.0 32.8 50.0 17.2 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 54 94.7 0.0 46.3 44.4 9.3 Mathematics SYSTEM Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV Not Partially Not Partially Number Tested Tested* All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 114 97.4 0.0 33.3 43.0 23.7 Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 84.6 0.0 90.9 9.1 0.0 Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 34 100.0 0.0 50.0 41.2 8.8 Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 79 96.3 0.0 26.6 43.0 30.4 Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 65 95.6 0.0 35.4 40.0 24.6 Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 49 100.0 0.0 30.6 46.9 22.4 Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43 93.5 0.0 41.9 48.8 9.3 *** Less than 10 students tested * age of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable Note: Some students took an alternate assessment in lieu of this assessment 11 (EL) 201-0040

12 (EL) 201-0040 STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Alabama Alternate Assessment The Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA) is designed for students with significant cognitive disabilities whose Individualized Education Program (IEP) team determines that the student will not participate in the regular state assessments. Number Tested Percernt Tested * SCHOOL SYSTEM Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV Not Partially Number Tested Reading Tested * Not Partially All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Less than 10 students tested * age of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable Note: Students in grades kindergarten through eight and eleven participated in the reading subject-area test of the Alabama Alternate Assessment. Mathematics All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Less than 10 students tested * age of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable Note: Students in grades three through eight and eleven participated in the mathematics subject-area test of the Alabama Alternate Assessment. Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing Alabama students in grades 5, 7, and 10 are given the Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing (ADAW) each year to measure their writing skills. This table shows how well students met the performance standard on this test. Number Tested Tested * SCHOOL SYSTEM Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV Not Partially Grade 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 90 94.7 3.3 36.7 53.3 6.7 Grade 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 98 83.1 4.1 26.5 60.2 9.2 Grade 10 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 95 90.5 3.2 32.6 46.3 17.9 Number Tested Tested * Not Partially *** Less than 10 students tested * age of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable

13 (EL) 201-0040 TAXPAYERS' REPORT - FISCAL YEAR Total 2005-2006 Fiscal Year Revenue = $14,191,403.95 Total 2005-2006 Fiscal Year Expenditure = $13,089,312.85 Source of Revenue Amount Local Revenue Breakdown Local School Revenue $977,248.90 Local Capital Projects Revenue $79,531.94 Other Local Revenue (includes local taxes) $2,959,563.78 Total Local Revenue $4,016,344.62 Mills Equivalent This is the total amount of revenue collected locally for public school purposes, divided by the value of one regular system mill of ad valorem tax. The state average is 31.83 mills equivalent. This System Grade 63.87 A This table provides a breakdown of local revenues for fiscal year. The revenue from local school projects/activities and the capital projects fund have been itemized to provide a more complete analysis of local fund sources. Spending Per Student The table below shows the spending per student for this school system. The letter grade compares the system's per student spending to the state, southeast, and nation. School Year Amount State SouthEast National 2005-2006 $7,863.30 B- C D+ A = Excellent B = Good C = Average D = Poor F = Fail