City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Similar documents
Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

SMART 1 Public Meeting #1. February 24, 2016

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

4 Ridership Growth Study

APPENDIX C Arlington Transit On-Board Survey Technical Memorandum

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

Executive Summary. TUCSON TRANSIT ON BOARD ORIGIN AND DESTINATION SURVEY Conducted October City of Tucson Department of Transportation

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

NORTH YORK CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Climate Change Action Plan: Transportation Sector Discussion Paper: Cycling

Previous Transit Studies MTTF MEETING #

DUNDAS WEST-BLOOR Mobility Hub Profile

MIDCOAST MAINE TRANSIT STUDY. In Association with: MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS

VI. Market Factors and Deamnd Analysis

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Dear City Council Members,

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Urban planners have invested a lot of energy in the idea of transit-oriented

Delta Planning Workshop Team

Appendix 1 Transit Network Analysis

North Coast Corridor:

Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Comprehensive Service Assessment. December 2015

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Aurora Corridor to E Line

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

I-20 East Transit Initiative. Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 9, :00-6:00 PM

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Planning for Bus Rapid Transit in the Milwaukee Region

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN: Survey Results and Analysis

Corridor Advisory Group Meeting #1 June 7, 2018

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Characteristics from these programs were used to compare to and evaluate existing conditions in Howard County.

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

Cobb Community Transit

Fiscal Year Budget Overview

Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity

Light Rail Transit in North Central Calgary Open House and Workshop Summary. Summer 2013

Understanding the Market of Metro Transit's Ridership and Services and How Technology Can Help Kevin J. Krizek Ahmed M. El-Geneidy

Land Use and Transportation Town Hall September 17, 2018

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

REYKJAVÍK - NEW MOBILITY OPTIONS

Classification Criteria

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

July 23, Transit Workshop

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

NACTO Designing Cities 2014 Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer October 23, 2014

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Building Community Partnerships for Mobility:

Transit Optimization Plan. September 2017

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

City of Edmonton - ETS. ETS Ridership Growth Strategy and Planning Review. Summary Report. May Excellence in Transportation Planning

Transcription:

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study April 2015

Overview Project Background Key Findings CitiBus Service Allocation Policy Discussion 2

Project Background 3

About CitiBus Operates 17 routes within the City of Davenport Ridership has continued to increase CitiBus carried over 1.5 million passengers in FY 2014, compared to 910,000 passengers in FY 2005 CitiBus coordinates service with Bettendorf Transit and MetroLINK 4

Project Background Davenport Public Transportation Study is a COA Comprehensive Operational Analysis Ten-year blueprint for transit in City of Davenport Address short-term transit mobility needs Objectives Develop a Service Allocation Policy Effectively and efficiently utilize City resources Continue to grow ridership Tailor transit service to meet unmet community needs Create near and long term recommendations 5

Project Approach Data-driven analysis Industry best practices Inclusive, collaborative process between staff and community stakeholders We Are Here Data Collection & Analysis (March-April 2015) Plan Development (May-July 2015) Finalization of Plan (August-September 2015) On-Going Public and Stakeholder Involvement 6

Key Findings 7

Population & Employment Density (2010) Higher Density Areas Downtown Locust St Kimberly Rd East 53 rd St Density concentrated along major corridors Street network configuration varies Data Source: Bi-State Regional Commission 8

Low-Income Population Highest densities found in downtown core 4% of total population 93% of riders surveyed earn less than Davenport s median household income 63% of riders surveyed have an annual household income of less than $15,000 Data Source: American Community Survey (2013) 9

Minority Population Highest densities spread across the downtown core 22% of total population 48% of riders surveyed identified as a minority Data Source: American Community Survey (2013) 10

Zero Vehicle Households Highest densities found downtown along 4 th Street and Brady/Harrison Streets 3% of total population 87% of riders surveyed did not have access to a working vehicle Data Source: American Community Survey (2013) 11

Senior Population Highest densities found at senior living facilities and are dispersed throughout the area 9% of total population Just 3% of riders surveyed were over the age of 65 Data Source: American Community Survey (2013) 12

Youth Population (Ages 10-17) Youth densities spread across the city Highest concentrations near downtown core 6% of total population 10% of riders surveyed were under the age of 18 Data Source: American Community Survey (2013) 13

College-Age Population (Ages 18-24) Similar density distribution pattern to youth 7% of total population 14% of riders surveyed were college students Data Source: American Community Survey (2013) 14

CitiBus Rider Profile Typical Rider Low-income No private vehicle access Rides multiple times per week Traveling to work or school Does not pay full fare Has been riding CitiBus longer than 2 years 15

Rider Opinion of CitiBus Service Three most positive qualities of CitiBus Driver knowledge of system Cost of service (fare) Safety while waiting for or riding buses Three qualities needing most improvement Hours of service Bus cleanliness Time spent waiting for bus 16

What Do Riders Want? 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 17

System Ridership Boardings concentrated at key shopping areas, schools, and transfer locations Strong activity on Locust St. and in downtown core Lack of marked bus stops creates dispersed boarding activity Data Source: Onboard Passenger Ridecheck (March 2015) 18

Daily Passengers Weekday Ridership 4,320 weekday riders Top 3 routes (Routes 4, 7, and 10) account for 37% of system ridership 800 700 600 500 400 Average Weekday Ridership 300 200 100 0 4 10 7 22 6 9 1 15 2 5 3 14 53 12 20 Route

Daily Passengers Saturday Ridership 3,460 Saturday riders (80% of weekday ridership) Routes 4, 7, and 10 still top 3 for ridership (40% of total) Route 4 alone is 20% of Saturday ridership 800 700 600 500 400 300 Average Saturday Ridership 200 100 0 4 7 10 1 9 22 5 53 2 3 15 6 14 12 Route

Passengers per Revenue Hour Weekday Productivity Average of 21.8 passengers per revenue hour (pph) Route 4 is highest in ridership and productivity Route 7 has higher frequency but short alignment serving major destinations Route 22 serves key destinations and has a direct alignment Route 10 has high ridership but low performance 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Weekday Productivity 0 4 22 7 20 6 9 15 2 1 5 3 10 14 53 12 Route

Passengers per Revenue Hour Saturday Productivity Saturdays have free fares Average of 24.2 pph, higher than weekdays Route 4 still most productive 40 35 30 25 20 Saturday Productivity 15 10 5 0 4 7 9 1 22 5 53 2 3 10 6 15 14 12 Route

Key Findings Existing linear, mixed-use corridors and transit-oriented groups concentrated in downtown core support lifestyle transit Riders want more service hours and higher service frequencies Routes 4, 7, and 10 consistently have highest ridership Routes 1, 4, 7, 9, 22 have big city productivity 23

Service Allocation Policy Strategy Discussion 24

City Vision for Transit Davenport in Motion and Davenport 2025 envisioned a city: In which living and working will not require a car, That has enhanced transportation options, That introduces Complete Streets, and That includes a more walkable urban environment. 25

CitiBus Strategy Discussion How can CitiBus help the transit system evolve to support this vision? Develop and prioritize strategies that support City vision for public mobility Target those consumers and markets most likely to use transit and for what types of trips Identify which transit system attributes are most important in attracting and retaining riders 26

Transit Market Targets Customers What type of riders should CitiBus target? Lifestyle riders: those who choose to use transit over other mobility options for daily travel Lifeline riders: those who rely on transit for daily mobility needs Trip-based riders: transit is an option for only specific trips What trip purposes should CitiBus prioritize? Work commutes School travel Medical/health Daily needs: shopping, errands, entertainment 27

Transit Market Targets Land Use Where should CitiBus focus service? In areas where people use or will use service the most In areas where people need service the most Equally in all areas throughout the city What land uses should be priorities for CitiBus? Dense city core area Mixed-use major corridors (Kimberly Rd.) Mixed-use walkable corridors (Locust St.) Dense residential areas characterized by multi-family dwellings Neighborhood residential areas with single-family homes Key destinations: malls, hospitals, schools, social service agencies 28

Key Transit Service Attributes Service Frequencies (What will attract spontaneous users?) Fast, Direct Travel (Is it competitive with car travel times?) Reliable Transit Service (Predictable, Dependable) Easy Walk to Transit (How far is easy in Davenport?) All-Day & All-Week Span of Service CitiBus Network Connections Connections with Other Regional Transit Providers New Flexible Transit Options (Besides just fixed route buses) Fare Pricing for Single Trips, Day/Weekly/Monthly Passes 29

Key Transit Service Attributes Frequency Fast, direct travel Reliable transit service Easy walk to transit Sunday service Later evening service CitiBus network connections Regional network connections New flexible transit options Fare pricing Which of these attributes are more or less important? How do people balance these tradeoffs in choosing transit? What attributes should CitiBus prioritize in allocating service? 30

Funding CitiBus Improvements How should CitiBus improvements be funded? Reallocation of existing transit resources Higher fares Increased City funding Maximize current tax rates 31

Next Steps Continue to Gather Feedback from: City Council Other Stakeholders Riders Transit Staff General Public Develop Service Allocation Policy and Recommendations 32