Scheduling 101 Calculating Running Time Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Multimodal Operations Workshop Houston, TX

Similar documents
Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Application to Miami-Dade Transit

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

the Story of the 30s & 70s Bus Lines James Hamre - WMATA

Transit Signal Preemption and Priority Treatments

Arnold Hinojosa

An Evaluation of Comprehensive Transit Improvements TriMet s Streamline Program

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

FY2006 Budget Board Budget Committee request for information. Board Request: Detailed information on bus route 5A DC-Dulless Airport

January Project No

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

New York s Revolutionary Transit Signal Priority Program

Steve Feigenbaum Service Planning Manager Katharine Eagan, AICP Chief Operating Officer HART Tampa, Florida

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Regional Bus Priority

Light Rail Transit in North Central Calgary Open House and Workshop Summary. Summer 2013

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

METRO. Monthly Board Report. February 2009

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY The Toronto Experience

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Konstantin Glukhenkiy Economic Affairs Officer

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Roadways. Roadways III.

Highway Engineering, second edition: Martin Rogers 2008 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Bus Queue Jump (Lane) Utilization: A case study in Calgary, AB Canada Muhammad Asim P.Eng, M.Sc. The City of Calgary

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Appendix T-2: Transportation Facilities Inventory

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Gratiot Avenue Transit Study Tech Memo #4: Ridership

Joseph Iacobucci. James Czarnecky, AICP

Demonstration of Possibilities to Introduce Semi-actuated Traffic Control System at Dhanmondi Satmasjid Road by Using CORSIM Simulation Software

Paratransit Service. ADA Paratransit Service

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Major Mobility Improvement Program (MMIP)

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Factors Influencing Effectiveness of Transit Signal Priority and Late-Bus Recovery at Signalized-Intersection Level

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Sacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study

IMPACTS TO TRANSIT FROM LOS ANGELES CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION. Word Count: 3,386 (body) + 2,000 (8 tables) + 1,500 (6 figures) = 6,886 words

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Evolution of urban transport policies: International comparisons

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

To: Marketing Planning and Legislative Committee Date: October 29, From: Anne Muzzini, Director of Planning & Marketing

2016 Planning Conference July 26, CONNECT COLUMBUS Building Columbus Transportation Future

Ujari Mohite. Vijay Mahal and Vincent Sanders. Revised Ridership Forecasts for the Uptown DBL project. Date: August 17, 2015 INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY:

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

Transit Choices December 8, 2016

North Coast Corridor:

DUNDAS WEST-BLOOR Mobility Hub Profile

Market Factors and Demand Analysis. World Bank

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

Managed Lanes: A Popular and Effective Urban Solution. Ed Regan Presented by Susan Buse

Markham Sports, Entertainment and Cultural Centre Transportation Overview

ASIA PACIFIC RAIL 2006

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

METRO Now. Transit Leader. One of only four urban. gain bus ridership in Purple and Green Lines. Red Line is one

Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority Strategies for Bus Rapid Transit on 5600 West Street in Salt Lake County, Utah

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Tunnel Reconstruction Brooklyn CB 1 August 14, 2018

Better Market Street Project. Project Update January 15, 2015

NORTH YORK CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

Advanced Transit Oriented Developments (ATODs) - Defined

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

Wellington Public Transport Spine Study

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

. ' motion. APPLtlDK.L - L"iLC_t1GLR 201b APPENDIX 7 TECHNICAL MEMOS

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Presentation to the City of Ottawa Transit Commission. February 20, 2013

Public Consultation Centre

ADVANCED TRANSIT OPERATIONS AND MODELING

ROUTE 52 ALLENTOWN. Port Authority of Allegheny County

Setting the Standard: An Introduction to Bicycle Accessibility to Transit Agencies

Integrated Regional Traffic Management. Michael Aherne Technical Director POLIS Conference 2009

July 23, Transit Workshop

Public Information and Participation Comments

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

Item B1 November 19, 2009

Welcome. Wilmington Transit Moving Forward Workshop Presentation. October 16, 2013

Building a sustainable world city: the role of transport and land use in London. London s relationship with transport

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

Transportation in 2025

Most Important Part of any Plan

Transcription:

Calculating Running Time Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority 2015 Multimodal Operations Workshop Houston, TX

MARTA FACTS MARTA is the ninth largest transit system in the U.S. that provides bus and paratransit service. The bus network, as of July 25, 2015, covered 1064 route miles with 97 bus routes supported by a fleet of 528 buses and 186 mobility vans. The rail network includes 4 Rail Lines, with over 23 million train car miles supported by a inventory of 200 rail cars and up to 33 trains operating daily. MARTA is the largest public transit system in the Southeast. MARTA s service population is over 2 million in the City of Atlanta, Fulton, DeKalb, & Clayton counties, carrying over ½ million passengers per day.

RUNNING TIME In this session I will cover the following : DEFINITION of Running Time vs Total Running Time Factors that AFFECT the calculation of Running Time TECHNOLOGY MARTA uses to monitor and improve Running Time STRATEGIES to better allocate running time

RUNNING TIME RUNNING TIME is the time it takes to make a one-way trip. A B The time it takes to get from point A to point B.

TOTAL RUNNING TIME TOTAL RUNNING TIME also referred to as Cycle Time, is the total time it takes to travel a route, round trip, including any time required for recovery at the end points. A B B A The time it takes to get from point A to point B, and back to point A.

FACTORS DISTANCE measured in miles (one-way) What is the length of a route? SPEED miles per hour How fast can the vehicle travel? Posted Speed Limits Traffic Conditions Ridership Patterns

DETERMINING DISTANCE How does MARTA determine the length of a route? Google Maps trace the route Field Observation travel the route Scheduling Software route trace

CONVERTING SPEED Speed must be converted from miles per hour to miles per minute. A. (60 Minutes/Miles Per Hour) = Minutes Per Mile SPEED (MPH) HOW LONG TO GO IN ONE (1) MILE 25 2.4 minutes 20 3 minutes 15 4 minutes B. (Minutes Per Mile) * Total Distance = Running Time

CALCULATING TOTAL RUNNING TIME In order to calculate the Total Running Time, we simply combine the Running Time in each direction, and include any additional time. This additional time is sometimes referred to as recovery time, dwell time, layover, or break time.

TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY - MARTA uses to monitor and improve Running Time. AVL - Automated Vehicle Location (Actual or real time Running Time values) APC - Automated Passenger Counters (Ridership or ons/off of passengers) TSP - Transit Signal Priority (Reduce dwell time at traffic signals for transit vehicles)

TRAVEL TIME REPORT At MARTA, we use an additional tool called the Travel Times Report (Crystal Report) & RideCheck Plus software. Each trip s running time is indicated respectively. Indicates the difference between actual trip time and scheduled trip time. Assists in monitoring On-Time Performance.

TRAVEL TIMES REPORT Indicates the difference between actual trip time and scheduled trip time. Each trip s running time is indicated respectively. Assists in monitoring On-Time Performance.

SCHEDULING STRATEGIES BONUS Scheduling 102

SCHEDULING STRATEGIES Scheduling 102 Here are a few methods used to optimize resources and save money after building trips with establishing efficient running times. INTERLINING REVERSE LOADED FREQUENCIES THE FORMULA

INTERLINING Scheduling 102 INTERLINING - is the combining of two routes at a shared connecting point. It takes advantage of shifting running time or recovery time from one route to another to balance runtime and reduces vehicle resource needs.

REVERSE LOADED FREQUENCIES Scheduling 102 PEAK DEMAND FREQUENCIES (Double-backing) - Provides increased service in the peak direction of travel by maintaining or reducing frequency in the non-peak direction of travel, however it does increase deadhead miles and hours. 15-min headway 25-min headway

THE FORMULA Scheduling 102 RT = f * v Total Running Time = frequency * # of vehicles RT = 30 * 2 RT = 60 f = RT / v frequency = Total Running Time divided by # of vehicles f = 60 / 2 f = 30 v = RT / f vehicles = Total Running Time divided by frequency of service v= 60 / 30 v= 2

SUMMARY Running Time Amount of Time Needed to Travel from Point A to Point B. Factors Determine Distance and Speed Technology Monitors and Improves Running Time Scheduling Strategies Optimize Resource Utilization

Q & A Question or Comments? THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME Contact Information: Johnathan Terrell jterrell@itsmarta.com 404-848-4264 References provided by TCRP Report 30