Bike sharing in 10 European countries report. Module 7: Poland

Similar documents
Bike sharing in 10 European countries report. Module 3: Czech Republic

Bike sharing in 10 European countries report. Module 8: Spain

Integrated Urban Mobility

Parking space management and the promotion of energy-efficient transport modes. Tomasz Zwolinski City of Krakow

Tartu, 18th September Rafal Ejsmont PSWE

Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme

HAVE DUTCH CITIES MADE THE TRANSITION TOWARDS NON- MOTORISED TRANSPORT?

AGENDA. Stakeholder Workshop

Cycling in the Netherlands The City and the region Utrecht

mobile Bicycle promotion as part of transport and city planning

Attractive, Sustainable and Healthy Mobility

Target Group The target groups were cyclists, as well as representatives of creative arts and other members of the public.

BYPAD. Bicycle Policy Audit CITY OF GENT March Summary. Tim Asperges Liesbeth Reekmans. Langzaam Verkeer

Developing a Birmingham Transport Space Allocation policy. David Harris Transport Policy Manager Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council

Bike share success factors

Case study Strasbourg (FR)

The seamless journey The seamless journey: Public transport links with walking and cycling

EuroVelo Overview Route Database

VILNIUS SUMP. Gintarė Krušinskaitė International project manager place your logo here

Jozef Zuallaert. MobiMind ebvba

London s Cycling Revolution Berlin

Integrating health aspects into transport policy and planning. Cycling Plan in the Ile-de-France Region. Françoise GUASPARE Ile-de-France Europe

Action plan to promote local mobility in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany)

This objective implies that all population groups should find walking appealing, and that it is made easier for them to walk more on a daily basis.

Velocittà conference 16 November 2017 VELIB METROPOLE. The world s largest eco-friendly bike-sharing system

March, 2017 Christophe Najdovski, Deputy Mayor of Paris for transport, street network, mobility and public space. Roads and Mobility Parisian Policy

Roundtable on integrated and sustainable urban transport. Mio Suzuki (University of Tokyo) Hiroki Nakamura (Chuo University)

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

Canada s Capital Region Delegation to the Velo-City Global 2010 Conference

Case study Dublin (IE)

FASTER. EASIER. COOLER.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

Low Emission Zones as a Tool of Local Low-Carbon Mobility Policy - Case of Sárvár Hungary

The Amsterdam Story. The socio-economic value of cycling and innovative planning practices in context in transition. Kees van Ommeren.

ABERDEEN: CITY OF THE FUTURE

TOWARDS A BIKE-FRIENDLY CANADA A National Cycling Strategy Overview

Policy factsheet 2 MOBILITY MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR SCHOOLS.

[Bicycle] Bells and Whistles to Improve Your Audits and Research. Jonny Rotheram. Rail~Volution - October LA 1

Mobility Stations as support of intermodal transport connections. Jan Rickmeyer, Cycling Coordinator of the City of Leipzig

ISIS. Overview of SPICYCLES BYPAD Final Conference in Tartu (18-19 September 2008) Stefano Proietti & Mario Gualdi

FAQ sheet Dutch Cycling Embassy

IBI Group November 5, 2012

Konstantin Glukhenkiy Economic Affairs Officer

Making Dublin More Accessible: The dublinbikes Scheme. Martin Rogers Colm Keenan 13th November 2012

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

FACTSHEET on Bike sharing and public bicycle system

THE TWO BANKS OF THE TAGUS RIVER BY INTEGRATING THE BYCICLE INTO A MULTIMODAL SYSTEM

Cecil County, Maryland. Bicycle Master Plan

Parallel Workshop: Avoid

CITY PLANNING ADMINISTRATION. The walkable city. Michael Erman, City of Stockholm Vienna/CORP 2012, 15 May 2012

InnovaSUMP Innovations in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans for lowcarbon urban transport

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

CONDUITS DST-Tel Aviv-Yafo Case Study

Shkodra Cycling City Great tradition-bright future Presented by: Entela Shkreli GO2 NGO

InnovaSUMP Good Practices from Exeter, Ravenna & Viseu

Case study PARMA (Italy)

Case study Copenhagen

CIVITAS WEBINAR Bikes on buses in Madeira. Claudio Mantero 30 th of November 2015

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Progetto P.A.S.T.A Physical activity through sustainable transport approaches. Incentivare il cambiamento comportamentale nella mobilità

Progetto P.A.S.T.A REGIO-MOB. Analisi delle buone pratiche di mobilità sostenibile

phoenix regional bike share program sponsorship

EUROPEAN MOBILITY WEEK September 2015

The benefits of cycling. Enfield conference 8 april 2016

Bike-sharing. The State of Play:

Nantes - European Green Capital 2013 Key elements of its success. Présentation Jean-François RETIERE Direction générale déplacements Septembre 2013

WALK- AND bike-friendly TURLOCK

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

Urban Pathways. FACTSHEET on Bike sharing and public bicycle system 2017

Gap analysis. Kaunas. [Type text]

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Concept of Sustainable Transport and integrated Land Use Planning- An Overview. Manfred Breithaupt GIZ Water, Energy, Transport

PBS CITY SPECIFIC PLAN VADODARA. Stakeholder Workshop

GOOD PRACTICE BICIPOLITANA

INTEGRATED MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION IN INDIA

G u i d e l i n e C Y C L I N G C O S T - E F F E C T I V E M E A S U R E S Version: November 2015

Bike Friendly Business Application Form

Public transport and town planning from a retroactive point of view C. Wallstrom, S. Johansson et al

URBAN TRANSPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT Slobodan Mitric World Bank. CODATU XIII, November 2008 Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Ten years of bike-sharing in Vienna An exploration into subjective user choices

The Belgian experience An actual view on mobility policy towards workplaces in Flanders (Belgium)

Masterplan Bicycle Traffic in Munich

Cycling Inclusive Transport Planning

Lessons from international experience How to better use our public money to the benefit of walking and cycling

Evolution of urban transport policies: International comparisons

Bike Routes Assessment: 95 Ave, 106 St & 40 Ave. Replace with appropriate image in View > Master.

Case for the Final Round. Evaluation Plan for the Vancouver Public Bikeshare Program. June 10, 2013

Metropolises on the move ALLIANCE FOR CYCLING

Perspectives for a Sustainable Mobility. Slide Presentation. Check Against Delivery Embargoed until 8:45 PM, 4 November 2010

Walking and Cycling Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

City of Perth Cycle Plan 2029

Municipality of Sofia Traffic Master Plan. Intelligent Transport Systems Strategy Andrew Walsh

How to achieve fluid traffic

Green Mobility. Emani Kumar. Coordinator, ICLEI Asia & Executive Director, ICLEI South Asia.

Ride your bike! National Cycling Plan 2002 to Measures to promote cycling in Germany. Report by the Federal Government.

CFE certification Bicycle-friendly Employer

Cities Connect. Cities Connect! How Urbanity Supports Social Inclusion

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

TAC February 1, 2012 Prepared by Metro Bike Program

REYKJAVÍK - NEW MOBILITY OPTIONS

Transcription:

Working Document Number: D 2.4 Work package: Bike sharing in 10 European countries report. Module 7: Poland WP2 Date of Preparation: 29.11.2010 Author(s): Magdalena Kowalewska, Rafał Ejsmont Editor(s): Project Co-ordinator: Alberto Castro Fernández, Günter Emberger, Nigel Williams Janett Büttner choice GmbH Holzmarktstraße 6-9 D-10179 Berlin Tel +49 (0)30 231491 250 E-mail: buettner@choice.de

Table of Contents 1. Country overview 4 2. Market Potential 6 3. Kraków 8 3.1. City overview 8 3.2. Bike One 9 1

Figures Figure 1-1: Map of Poland Image: Google 4 Figure 1-2: BikeOne user on the Vistula River embankment. Image: BikeOne 5 Figure 3-1: Map of Krakow. Image: Google Maps 8 Figure 3-2: Map of BikeOne stations. Image: BikeOne 9 Figure 3-3: BikeOne station Image: Rafal Ejsmont 10 2

Tables Table 1-1: Facts and figures of Poland. 5 Table 2-1: Polish BSS status quo. 6 Table 3-1: Facts and figures of Krakow. 9 Table 3-2: Facts and figures of BikeOne of Krakow. 10 3

1. Country overview Poland is a country located on the Central European Plains with postglacial hilly regions in the north and some medium height mountains (the Sudety and Carpathians) in the south. Southern, relatively more industrialized regions of Poland have some more densely populated areas. Since 1990 the country has been a subject of a rapid transition towards the market oriented economy and in 2004 became a member of the European Union. Car ownership has radically increased in the last years, even if the annual income of the population is still substantially lower than the EU average. Figure 1-1: Map of Poland Image: Google Maps A quite varied, generally medium level of bicycle ownership in Poland is not reflected in the level of daily cycle use. Cycling is considered mostly as a recreational activity. In certain urban areas, however, some symptoms of recovery of daily cycling usage can be observed. A Green Paper on the Regional Cycling System was prepared by a Pomeranian NGO in 2008, but has not yet been made available to the general public. Helmets are not obligatory for cyclists in Poland. 4

Country overview (a)2009. Population (a) Net income (a) Bicycle ownership 38,138,000 4,732.44 /person*year 63% of households has at least one bike Table 1-1: Facts and figures of Poland. Krakow s BikeOne was the first implemented bike sharing scheme in Poland. It was similar to the Bicing scheme in Barcelona. Initiated on 15th November 2008 as a pilot project. It was closed after four weeks to be re-opened in March 2009. Other large cities in Poland (Lodz, Wroclaw, Poznan, Warsaw and Gdansk) claim to be studying the idea of implementing bike-sharing schemes but considering the poor status of municipal cycling policies it appears that these projects have not developed into actual implementation. In the OBIS WP2 project only one operating bike sharing scheme (BikeOne of Krakow) was studied. The following market potential analysis is based on the data collection from that one scheme. The data collection could not provide figures that allow a detailed analysis of market potentials per city category including modal split figures or PT characteristics. Therefore the following analysis is a very rough estimation that might be refined during the key factor research later in the project. Figure 1-2: BikeOne user on the Vistula River embankment. Image: BikeOne 5

2. Market Potential Poland is a medium sized European country with 231 cities with more than 20,000 inhabitants, including the relatively large number of 39 cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants. The coverage of bike sharing schemes is practically nil, although in four large cities the introduction of such schemes is being officially considered in the last couple of years. Large cities and especially medium-sized cities are not yet covered at all by bike sharing schemes. There is no country or region wide of bike rental systems even though there are some private bike rental facilities in particular tourist areas. Railway operators offer some bike carrying opportunities but there are very few if any secure bike parking and rental facilities at railway stations. However, in view of substantial traffic congestion problems, there is a considerable potential to introduce a regular bike sharing system in a number of large conurbations. >500,00 0 500,000-100,000 100,000-20,000 Total No. of Polish cities with population >20.000 per size category No. of Polish cities with BSS in operation 1 No. of Polish cities with BSS considered for implementation 5 34 192 231 4 2 1 7 Table 2-1: Polish BSS status quo. In view of the low level of understanding of the potential value of cycling as an urban transport mode among city decision makers and city planners, the short term potential of BSS is only perceived among a very small number of larger cities. The level of development of visible cycling infrastructure is very low. The visible cycling infrastructure is fragmented and usually of poor quality, while the concept of invisible cycling infrastructure is either unknown or misunderstood. Some cities tend to extend the car-free areas in urban centres, but quite often cycling there is formally prohibited. There are practically no secure bike facilities in either urban areas, at railway stations or public transport hubs. The difficult financial situation in cities due to a world wide crisis results in cuts in the amounts devoted to the development of cycling in some municipalities. In view of the low institutional position of cycling in the public sphere, the fund available within the framework of EU sponsored projects is often misallocated. This situation is also due to lack of organised co-operation of cycling advocacy groups with public authorities. The share of cycling in the modal split is not subject to regular monitoring; rough estimates suggest that it amounts to 1-3% in some cities. Most cycling traffic in large urban areas has a recreational character. The only BSS introduced in Krakow last year has 6

Market Potential gained much publicity in the national media and has become quite popular among the local population. It is now a source of inspiration for other urban areas. 7

3. Kraków 3.1 City overview Although a small part of Krakow is situated on a hilly area, most of the city is flat since it lies on the area located along the Vistula riverbed. Krakow is the second most important cultural and academic centre of the country, being a world class tourist destination thanks to its rich cultural heritage. A large part of the city is densely built up, while the historical centre retains its medieval character with a number of squares and streets closed for car traffic and providing good conditions for non-motorised traffic. Krakow has a moderate central European continental climate. Figure 3-1: Map of Krakow. Image: Google Maps Apart from in its historical centre Krakow has only a limited number of cycle tracks. Cycling share is still very low compared with other European cities (2-3% in modal split). Cycling has been mentioned in the local Transport Policy document, produced in 2007, but no target for cycling share was defined there. The municipal budget provides some funding for cycling schemes, but it is not usually spent in a productive way. 8

Kraków Bikes may be carried on board buses and trams on the Krakow public transport network. Bikes are carried either on special bike racks mounted on some buses or inside buses or trams outside peak periods. Population (a) Area (b) Tourists per year (b) 756,267 326.8 km² 8,060,000 Temperature Precipitation (b) Average (b) Maximal (a) Minimal (a) Amount Days 8.4 21.6-8.3 662.3 169 Modal Split (b) Roads (b) Cycle Car ownership (b) network (b) Private vehicle PT 1,263 km 70 km 613 car/1,000 38% 62% inhab. Accidents per year (b) Total Cycling 1,180 118 (a)2006. (b)2007 (c)2009 Table 3-1: Facts and figures of Krakow. Dead persons per year (b) Cycling 1 PT fare (c) 0.53/trip 32.49/month 3.2. Bike One Figure 3-2: Map of BikeOne stations. Image: BikeOne 9

Kraków On 15th November 2008 the city of Krakow introduced a bike sharing scheme BikeOne Krakow. The owner of the system is SANMARGAR, a company supported by a mobile phone operator. BikeOne works with fixed stations and registration is required. Customers may only preregister for the scheme via the internet, paying a deposit of 26. A subscription fee valid for 7, 30 or 90 days or the whole season costs 2.56; 5.34; 10.68 or 21.37 respectively. All payments have to be made either with a bank card or via a bank transfer. Users must have a specified minimum balance to cover the current bike rental costs, which depend on the time of usage. After registration, the user selects a bike at the station, enters the station bike locker number, a client number and a PIN and then if the system accepts the transaction - the bike must be taken from the station within 15 seconds. To return the bike the user locks the bike introducing part of the bike into the hire post at the station. Figure 3-3: BikeOne station Image:Rafal Ejsmont BikeOne offers a non-stop service (24h/7d). The first twenty minutes rental is free. The next 40 minutes costs 0.25, 60 to 120 minutes costs 0.38 and further hours costs 0.85. These amounts are deducted from the client s account balance. Registrations Rents Infrastructure (b) Average rent User profile (b) Total (a) 2008 Stations Bicycles duration (b) Male 15-29 years old 605 8,700 13 100 28 min 92% 63% (a)from the start till 31.01.09. (b)2008 Table 3-2: Facts and figures of BikeOne of Krakow. 10