Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

Similar documents
HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

General Information for Culvert Design

CHAPTER 4 SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN

Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage. Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.

WMS 8.4 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS

Plan B Dam Breach Assessment

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

The Basics of Culvert and Inlet Design

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Modeling of Long Culverts and Stormdrains A Comparison of Different Methods

USING A LABYRINTH WEIR TO INCREASE HYDRAULIC CAPACITY. Dustin Mortensen, P.E. 1 Jake Eckersley, P.E. 1

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

Stormwater Level of Service Study - Phase 2 Flooding Adjacent to Rock Creek

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

Stormwater Management Pond Design Brief. Greely Village Centre - Commercial Phase - Ultimate Conditions - - City of Ottawa -

Evaluation of June 9, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Study for Town of Weymouth, Norfolk, Co, MA

City of Roseville Section 13 Design Standards. _Bikeways January 2016 SECTION 13 BIKEWAYS

PROFILE OF SACRAMENTO RIVER, FREEPORT TO VERONA, CALIFORNIA,

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN STANDARDS

Information for File # SEW

Culvert Design Basics

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

SAWS QA/QC CHECKLIST WATER ADJUSTMENT/RELOCATION PROJECTS

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California

STRUCTURE S-65 PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION

GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Appendix G. Alternative Solutions Details. Krosno Creek Flood Reduction Project PROJECT FILE REPORT CITY OF PICKERING

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

PRELIMINARY STORM DRAINAGE REPORT


CALIFORNIA SALMONID STREAM HABITAT RESTORATION MANUAL APPENDIX IX-A CULVERT CRITERIA FOR FISH PASSAGE INTRODUCTION

CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM PERTINENT DATA

Rock Ramp Design Guidelines. David Mooney MS Chris Holmquist-Johnson MS Drew Baird Ph.D. P.E. Kent Collins P.E.

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

STORM DRAIN STUDY WRIGHT PROPERTY 203 CENTRAL AVENUE GAITHERSBURG, MD

MEMORANDUM. TNC Fisher Slough Final Design and Permitting Subject: DRAFT Technical Memorandum: Levee Emergency Spillway Design

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT PROPOSED CULVERT STRUCTURES SR 194, SECTION 10

MEMO. Schedule 'B' Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design Lakeview Boulevard Improvements Culvert Assessment.

Ellis Y. Byeon, PE Bryan VanderGheynst, PE 1

APPENDIX C. Fluvial and Tidal Hydraulics Report

Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings CHUCK KEEPORTS FOREST HYDROLOGIST ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA

Illinois State Water Survey

Sediment Basin 7E-12. Design Manual Chapter 7 - Erosion and Sediment Control 7E - Design Information for ESC Measures BENEFITS.

LARIMER COUNTY: ENGINEERING DOUGLAS ROAD (CR 54)

Hydrologic, Hydraulic and Geomorphic Technical Memorandum

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

East Downtown Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 15 Infrastructure Assessment Study

COST EFFECTIVE STORAGE CAPACITY INCREASE FOR ALUMINA TAILINGS DISPOSAL AREA THROUGH SPILLWAY OPTIMISATION

Evaluating Surge Potential in CSO Tunnels

Roadway Design Manual

RESILIENCE THROUGH RESTORATION

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

STRUCTURE 65-B PURPOSE SPILLWAY OPERATION

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

Designing Labyrinth Spillways for Less than Ideal Conditions Real World Application of Laboratory Design Methods

Fish Passage Assessment Report Mare Brook Culverts

JEFFERSON COUNTY, ARKANSAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS

3.0 Basin and Watershed Characteristics

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

Wanganui Rd Flood Modelling Investigation

Outlet Structures T-12

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES. Lake Okeechobee & EAA Vol 3 A-i December 2005 Version 1 Draft 4

Huntington District. For More Information Contact (304)

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Hillview Crossing Townhome Development

Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence

SELBY CREEK SILVERADO TRAIL CULVERT FISH PASSAGE ASSESSMENT

VOLUME 2 OF 5 VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER

Exercise (3): Open Channel Flow Rapidly Varied Flow

Section 10 - Hydraulic Analysis

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

Total Suspended Solids, Stable Flow, and Wet Weather Event Monitoring in the Bass River Watershed. December The Cadmus Group, Inc.

Exercise (4): Open Channel Flow - Gradually Varied Flow

Fish Passage Assessment of Private Stream Crossings on Lower Stonybrook Creek

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]

Hard Hat Services ph: hardhatinc.com 932 N. Wright St., Suite 160 Naperville, IL 60563

Driveway Design Criteria

North Diversion Channel Physical Modeling:

South Burlington Multi-Site Stormwater Infrastructure Assessment Site No. 2 Bartlett Bay Road Culvert

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

SUNRAY DRIVE/PERRINE RANCH ROAD FROM WEST OF DARLINGTON ROAD TO GRAND BOULEVARD AND PERRINE RANCH ROAD AT SEVEN SPRINGS BOULEVARD

MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Planning & Zoning Commission

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

Skagit River Historical Flood Elevations and Peak Flow Estimates

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

Follow this and additional works at:

Transcription:

DATE: November 3, 2011 Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis TO: FROM: RE: Jim Reiser, P.E. Project Manager Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Kurt Killian, P.E., CFM Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Design Hike and Bike Facilities to 30% Plans Project Pegasus Phase I, IH 30 From Sylvan Avenue to IH 35 (CSJ 1068 04 116) TxDOT Dallas District Contract No. 18 748P5003 As part of the referenced contract, Parsons Brinckerhoff was authorized to design a mixed use (hike and bike) trail within the west levee sump connecting the west bound collector distributor bridge to the Beckley Avenue sidewalk. As part of the design, the trail will cross over an existing ditch within the West Levee Sump. The crossing will require the placement of a proposed culvert to provide adequate conveyance of drainage within the existing ditch to the West Levee Sump. This technical report presents the hydraulic culvert analysis for the proposed culvert crossing. SCOPE The following tasks were performed for the design and analysis of the proposed culvert: Prepare a drainage area map for the culvert s contributing drainage area. Perform runoff calculations for the culvert contributing drainage area. Perform a hydraulic analysis and perform culvert sizing. Prepare a culvert plan and profile sheet and hydraulic calculation sheet for the re submittal of the 30 percent PS&E. Prepare a drainage report for TxDOT. PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSING DESCRIPTION The proposed crossing consists of a 30 inch RCP culvert with mitered ends conforming to the fill slope. The total length of the structure between the mitered inverts is 86 linear feet. The culvert is proposed at a 4.07 percent slope with the upstream invert elevation set at 395.5 feet and the downstream invert elevation set at 392.0 feet. The bikeway path width with respect to the culvert alignment is 13.28 feet at an approximate elevation of 401 feet. The embankment fill is configured at a 6:1 (H:V) slope along the upstream face and 5:1 (H:V) slope along the downstream face. The culvert end treatments are proposed as mitered faces, conforming to the embankment slope. Stone riprap is proposed Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis Page 1

downstream of the culvert for erosion protection. The culvert plan and profile is shown in the attached plan set Culvert Layout A. DATA COLLECTION As part of the culvert analysis, the following data was collected: H GAC 2 foot contours, dated 2007 H GAC aerial, dated 2009 Field visit and photographs City of Dallas Interior Levee Drainage Study West Levee Phase II, dated January 2009 by Jacobs/ Carter Burgess. Dallas County FIRM Panel No. 48113C0340J, effective date August 23, 2001. FEMA EFFECTIVE DATA The proposed Hike and Bike Trail at the Culvert A crossing is located along the City of Dallas West Levee Sump adjacent to the Trinity River. Based on the referenced FEMA data, the proposed project is located outside of the delineated Zone AE flood hazard area, within a shaded Zone X delineated area. The current effective FIRM panel is shown in Figure 1. The referenced flood hazard base flood (100 year) elevation is 404 feet within the West Levee Sump area. From the project survey and proposed trail layout at Culvert A, the proposed trail crossing and the drainage ditch will be inundated and overtopped by the effective base flood elevation due to backwater from the sump area. Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis Page 2

Figure 1 FEMA FIRM Panel Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis Page 3

HYDROLOGY The contributing drainage area for the culvert was delineated using the overland 2 foot contours, aerial photography, and a field visit. The overall contributing drainage area for the culvert is approximately 2.45 acres. The contributing drainage area is limited to the area east of North Beckley Avenue and the adjacent tracts along the drainage ditch. The culvert drainage area is shown in Figure 2. The Rational Method was used to compute the drainage area peak runoff rates. The Rational Method equation being Q = CIA, where Q is the computed peak runoff rate; C is the runoff coefficient; I is the frequency runoff intensity; and A is the drainage area. Using the aerial photography, a runoff coefficient averaged c value of 0.652 was computed for the contributing drainage area. The contributing area land use consists of a mixture of light commercial, undeveloped tracts, drainage channels, and road right of way. The following table presents a breakdown of the land use and the calculations for the average c value. Table 1 Land Use & Runoff Coefficients Type Area (ac) C Grassy Tract Area 0.88 0.35 Commercial Tract/ Buildings 0.59 0.90 Ditch Channel Area 0.53 0.90 Ditch Overbank Area 0.35 0.55 Pavement 0.10 0.90 TOTALS: 2.45 0.652 The longest flow path within the drainage area is approximately 660 feet. The estimated travel time within the drainage area was computed to be 5 minutes. Therefore, the minimum time of concentration (Tc) of 10 minutes was used for the peak flow calculations based on TxDOT criteria. The time of concentration is used to compute the runoff intensity using the equation: I = b/ (Tc + d) e. The b, d, e coefficients are frequency and region dependent. Agencies will have differing intensity coefficients and therefore, equivalent time of concentrations will result in differing intensity values. A comparison of the computed intensity values for Dallas County using the TxDOT and iswm b, d, e coefficients was performed. The TxDOT values were determined to be more conservative; therefore they were used for this project. The following table presents the multiple frequency intensity comparison. Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis Page 4

Table 2 Intensity Value Comparison: TxDOT and iswm Frequency: 2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 25 Year 50 Year 100 Year TxDOT Values for Dallas County for Tc = 10 min e (in) 0.791 0.782 0.777 0.774 0.771 0.762 b 54 68 78 90 101 106 d (mins) 8.3 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.3 Intensity (in/hr) 5.42 6.89 8.01 9.33 10.56 11.57 NCTCOG iswm Values for Dallas County for Tc = 10 min e (in) 0.81545 0.80449 0.79827 0.78187 0.77019 0.75870 b 55.179 70.024 79.931 87.970 94.058 100.079 d (mins) 10.0 12.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Intensity (in/hr) 4.80 5.82 6.54 7.58 8.41 9.27 The design frequency utilized to size the proposed culvert for the hike and bike trail was a 10 year storm event and the check flood frequency was for 100 year storm event. Flows were computed for the 10 year and 100 year storm events for the contributing drainage area and are presented in Table 3 along with the drainage area parameters. Table 3 Culvert Drainage Area Parameters and Flows Summary Drainage Area Tc I10 I100 Q10 Q100 (ac) C Value (min) (in/hr) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) 2.45 0.652 10 8.01 11.57 12.8 18.5 Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis Page 5

N Figure 2 Culvert A Drainage Area Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis Page 6

HYDRAULIC COMPUTATIONS The proposed culvert crossing was analyzed using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) HY 8 Culvert Hydraulic Analysis Program, Version 7.2 build date July 2011. The design (10 year) and check (100 year) computed flows were used for the hydraulic computations. The proposed culvert dimensions were taken from the culvert layout sheet; this data is described previously. The tailwater condition was computed within the HY 8 model. The downstream channel cross section, which was taken from survey data, was incorporated into the model. The program used normal depth calculations to compute a downstream channel water surface elevation as well as an outlet depth at the culvert face. The highest of these elevations was reported as the culvert s tailwater condition. Because the current version of HY 8 does not have options for modeling mitered inlets, the conventional projecting inlet type was selected for the analysis. This selection provides similar entrance loss results as would the mitered, conformed to fill slope inlet type proposed for the crossing. Because of the inlet type selection, the full length of the culvert crossing (86 feet) was modeled within the HY 8 analysis. The HY 8 model computations results are presented in the following table. Total Culvert Discharge Discharge (cfs) (cfs) Table 4 Culvert A HY 8 Computation Summary Table Headwater Elevation (ft) Inlet Control Depth(ft) Outlet Control Depth(ft) Flow Type Normal Depth (ft) Critical Depth (ft) Outlet Depth (ft) Tailwater Depth (ft) Outlet Velocity (ft/s) Tailwater Velocity (ft/s) 0.00 0.00 396.00 0.00 0.0* 0 NF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.84 1.84 396.57 0.57 0.0* 1 S2n 0.25 0.43 0.25 0.26 7.20 2.53 3.68 3.68 396.82 0.82 0.0* 1 S2n 0.33 0.62 0.34 0.38 8.76 3.10 5.52 5.52 397.02 1.02 0.0* 1 S2n 0.41 0.77 0.41 0.47 10.14 3.47 7.36 7.36 397.19 1.19 0.0* 1 S2n 0.48 0.89 0.49 0.54 10.92 3.76 9.20 9.20 397.36 1.36 0.0* 1 S2n 0.54 1.01 0.55 0.60 11.73 4.00 11.04 11.04 397.52 1.52 0.0* 1 S2n 0.59 1.11 0.60 0.66 12.18 4.20 12.80 12.80 397.66 1.66 0.0* 1 S2n 0.63 1.20 0.64 0.71 12.76 4.37 14.72 14.72 397.80 1.80 0.0* 1 S2n 0.68 1.29 0.71 0.76 12.83 4.53 16.56 16.56 397.93 1.93 0.0* 1 S2n 0.73 1.37 0.73 0.80 13.79 4.69 18.40 18.40 398.05 2.05 0.0* 1 S2n 0.77 1.45 0.77 0.84 14.29 4.80 Based on the culvert dimensions and supported by the HY 8 computations, the culvert is inlet controlled. The computed design (10 year) frequency headwater elevation is 397.66 feet and the 100 year headwater elevation is 398.05 feet. Based on the survey data along the drainage ditch, the 100 year headwater elevation is still contained within the upstream ditch banks. The drainage ditch bank elevations range from an approximate elevation of 400 feet near the bike path crossing to 404 feet at its upstream end near North Beckley Avenue. Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis Page 7

SUMMARY Based on the hydraulic analysis and HY 8 modeling presented within this technical report, the proposed 30 inch RCP culvert will provide adequate capacity to convey the contributing 2.45 acres of drainage area runoff for the 10 year design and 100 year check storm events. It was further determined that the backwater effects from the proposed culvert crossing will not raise the upstream water surface elevation within the drainage ditch above the ditch banks for storm events up to and including the 100 year storm event. Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis Page 8