Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

Similar documents
David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Aurora Corridor to E Line

WHAT IS BRT? Jack M. Gonsalves, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. February 22, 2012

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Joseph Iacobucci. James Czarnecky, AICP

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Roadways. Roadways III.

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Previous Transit Studies MTTF MEETING #

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

C Line Rapid Bus Preliminary Station Design

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

4 Ridership Growth Study

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

Overview of Pulse BRT and transit network redesign

GRTC PULSE. Arriving June 24, May 30, Overview by: Carrie Rose Pace Greater Richmond Transit Company Director of Communications

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

Copenhagen Cycling Map. Red Lines Cycling facilities

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Item B1 November 19, 2009

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

Station Plan: Penn & 43rd Avenue

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

AGENDA. Stakeholder Workshop

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Planning Regionally With Transit

Complete Streets in Constrained Corridors: Chicago s Central Loop BRT

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

Rehabilitating First- and Last- Mile Connections

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT Corridor Technical Study. Eco-Rapid Transit/Orange Line Development Authority March 8, 2017

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

An Evaluation of Comprehensive Transit Improvements TriMet s Streamline Program

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

Gina M. M. Thomas. HDR, Transit Engineer Seattle, WA

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

The Who and What: Bus Rapid Transit Riders and Systems in the U.S.

How familiar are you with BRT?

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

LONDON s. system TRANSFORMING THE WAY LONDON MOVES

Kennedy Plaza and Providence Downtown Transit Connector PUBLIC MEETING. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

CENTRAL AND EAST CORRIDORS

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

9. TRANSIT ACCOMMODATIONS

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

REYKJAVÍK - NEW MOBILITY OPTIONS

Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Transportation in 2025

First Mile, Last Mile: Plans for all Shapes and Sizes. Hannah Lindelof, Principal Planner San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit September 18, 2017

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

Model Applications for Oakland Park Boulevard Transit Corridor Study

Capital Improvement Project Application: Bike Racks, Bus Stop Shelters, Sidewalks in Kings Canyon/Ventura Corridor Page 1 of 10

Peterborough Council on Aging

Bus Rapid Transit and all that JAZZ September 30, 2013

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Active Transportation on the Rise

Regional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation

Is St. Louis Ready for a Bike Share System? May 14, 2014 Public Open House

VOLUME 5 Technology and Option Evaluation

Appendix 3.2 D. Ridership Errata Sheet

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

North Coast Corridor:

Summary of Feedback Received during Speak Up Broward s 22 Speakers Bureau Engagements from December 10, 2013 through April 2, 2014

Transcription:

Swift Bus Rapid Transit June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit October 22, 2013

Swift Washington State s First BRT is almost 4 years old

Everett Transit

Everett Transit College Station Mall Station

Community Transit

Problem A Forced transfer in a difficult Pedestrian Environment

Partnership Community Transit and Everett Transit crafted a unique partnership to implement Swift. Everett Transit is a full partner in the project paying for the capital expenses of stations within their jurisdiction, building the Swift terminal at Everett Station, and contributing to the annual operating cost

WHAT IS BUS RAPID TRANSIT? MAP 21 defines Bus Rapid Transit as including.features that emulate the services provided by rail fixed guideway public transportation systems.

Introducing Swift Swift includes all of the Characteristics of of BRT : Running Ways Unique Brand Vehicles Fare Collection Stations ITS Service & Operations Plan

Swift SR 99 Everett Station to Aurora Village Transit Center 16.7 miles 5 jurisdictions 24 stations initially 14 northbound 14 southbound

BRT on State Route 99 The SR 99 corridor has the highest density of population and employment in Snohomish County

Swift Corridor Infrastructure 6.7 miles of Business Access Transit (BAT) lanes Transit Signal Priority Initially 10.5 miles of TSP TSP in City of Everett added in August 2011

BAT LANES

UNIQUE VEHICLES 15 Branded 62 foot articulated, hybrid vehicles

VEHICLES On board bike racks for 3 bikes Passive restraint for wheelchairs

Swift Station a sense of place The station is located on an 10 x60 easement - behind the sidewalk. Station elements include weather protection, information kiosk, fare collection, welcome mats, and jurisdictional artwork on the platform.

Innovative station design

EVERETT STATION Swift terminal at Everett Station: Exclusive terminus just south of existing bus bays

Off Board fare collection: Swift Fare Collection 2 Ticket Vending Machines at each station 2 Smart Card readers at each station Customers pay at the station, then board by any door Swift Ambassadors in the corridor randomly check fares

SWIFT SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS Swift runs 6 days per week 12 minute headways 5 a.m. 7 p.m. 20 minute headways evenings & Saturdays Consistently meeting goal of 10 second dwell times Compulsory stops at all stations Precision docking with rub rails

Swift Project Initial project cost approximately $31.3 million for 16.7 miles Approx cost per mile = $1.87 million Almost half the cost is for the new vehicles Project $3.4 million under budget Project was fully funded by Federal & State grants; partnerships; and local revenues Also obtained multiple Grants and partnership funds for the 1 st 3 years of Operating funds

Swift Project Cost Breakdown Vehicles = $13.6M 32 Stations = $13.8M Station kits = $4M Construction = $5.5M ROW = $1.5M Supporting costs = $2.8M Fare Collection = $1.1M Everett Station = $2.8M

Swift Timeline Only 4 years from Board Resolution to implementation! 2005 2007 2009

Monthly Ridership Swift carries the highest ridership of all Community Transit Routes and now has over 4400 boardings per day

System Ridership Swift ridership is more than double the next closest route 2012

CORRIDOR & MOBILITY GROWTH Route 2009 Route 2012 100 116,204 Swift 1,173,494 101 1,172,649 101 395,795 Total 1,288,853 1,569,289 +21.75% At a time of overall declining ridership (-19% systemwide since beginning of Recession), the SR 99 corridor has experienced +21.75% more riders since the inception of Swift

Customer Survey Corridor based survey conducted in November 2011 Rider characteristics and attitudes on Swift service

Has your travel time improved since Swift started? No, about the same 19% 56% No, slower 7% 7% Yes, 1-10 minutes faster 19% 27% Yes, 11-20 minutes faster 10% 24% Yes, 21-30 minutes faster 4% 12% Yes, more than 30 minutes faster 4% 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Swift Local Over 50% of Swift riders perceive travel time improvements of up to 20 minutes, with 23% reporting improvements of more than 20 minutes. In contrast, the majority of Local riders (63%) perceive their travel times have remained the same or gotten slower.

Swift /Local Preferences Swift gets me there faster Local buses get me closer to my destination I wait less time for Swift 40% 39% 46% Swift is easier to use Local buses are less expensive Swift buses are more comfortable or safer Swift gets me closer to my destination Local buses are easier to use I don't need to transfer if I ride the local bus Other Local buses get me there faster 7% 6% 11% 16% 20% 25% 29% Riders like Swift because it is fast, frequent, and easier to use. Riders like Local buses because they get them closer to destinations and are less expensive. 31% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Swift and Local

Access Mode Rode a bus or train 22% 27% Walked 54% 69% Dropped off by someone Rode with someone who parked Drove my car 5% 2% 0% 0% 3% 1% Rode my bicycle Used a mobility aid Multiple modes 1% 0% 0% 6% 4% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Swift Local riders are more likely to walk to the bus. More people are transferring to Swift. Swift riders are more likely to use other access modes riding a bike, driving alone, and being dropped off. Results suggest a positive impact of bike accommodations on Swift. Local

Incremental improvements 4 additional stations in Everett Curb bumpers at all stations TSP in Everett APTS technology suite CAD/AVL; APC; AAS; RTPI Queue jump at 148 th NB

LAND USE & ZONING Lynnwood Crossing Evergreen Revitalization Plan

Contact COMMUNITY TRANSIT June DeVoll Manager of Strategic Planning & Grants (425) 348-2337 june.devoll@commtrans.org