Unconventional Monetary Policy: Thoughts on the U.S. and Japanese Experiences International Conference on Capital Flows and Safe Assets John Rogers Senior Adviser Federal Reserve Board May 27, 2013 The views expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the author and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or of anyone else associated with the Federal Reserve System.
Trends in FOMC Communication Pre-1900 s: Act predictably, keep mum Taylor rule characterized policy reasonably well Mid-1990s, accelerating in early 2000s: Transparency The Statement, balance of risks, direction of future leaning - Crisis - 2008-2009: Large-scale asset purchases (LSAPs), i.e. Quantitative easing (QE) Forward Guidance: maintain for an extended period Summer 2011: Calendar Guidance December 2012: Committee anticipates that exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6.5%, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than 0.5% above the Committee s 2% longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well-anchored. Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 2 / 21
700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Word Count of FOMC Statements 1994-2013 Word count 800 0 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 3 / 21
Total FOMC Member Speeches Number of speeches 260 240 2013 annualized 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 4 / 21
Federal Funds Rate Percent per annum 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 5 / 21
Federal Reserve Bank Assets and Liabilities and Capital, 2007 2013 Billions of dollars 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Assets Repurchase agreements and all other assets U.S. Treasury accounts Liabilities and Capital Loans and liquidity programs Agency debt and mortgage backed securities Treasury securities, <1 year Treasury securities, 1 5 years Treasury securities, >5 years Federal Reserve notes in circulation Reverse RPs, capital, and all other liabilities Deposits of depository institutions and other deposits Jan 3, 2007 Jan 3, 2008 Jan 2, 2009 Jan 2, 2010 Jan 2, 2011 Jan 2, 2012 Jan 1, 2013 Wednesdays Source: H.4.1 Statistical Release (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/). Last updated March 25, 2013. Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 6 / 21
U.S. Unemployment Rate Percent 12 10 8 6 4 FOMC estimates of long-run normal rate of unemployment (range 5.2%-6%) 6.5% threshold for exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate 2 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 7 / 21
PCE Inflation Rate 12-month percent change 6 PCE Core PCE Trimmed mean PCE 5 4 3 2 1 2% inflation target 2.5% threshold for exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate 0-1 -2 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 8 / 21
US Monetary Policy Challenges Ahead Unwinding Quantitative Easing Liftoff of Federal Funds Rate Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 9 / 21
Direction of FOMC Dissents Dissent in favor of tighter policy Dissent in favor of looser policy 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Esther L. George Jeffrey M. Lacker Charles L. Evans Richard W. Fisher Narayana Kocherlakota Charles I. Plosser Thomas M. Hoenig Eric S. Rosengren Mark W. Olson Robert T. Parry Edward M. Gramlich Robert D. McTeer, Jr. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the William Poole Jerry L. Jordan J. Alfred Broaddus, Federal Reserve Jr. Gary System H. Stern Lawrence B. Lindsey John P. LaWare Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 10 / 21
The Japanese Experience Despite recent depreciation, the yen is not weak on a historical or real exchange rate basis 130 /$ Exchange Rate Broad Nominal Effective Exchange Rate Index 120 900 850 110 800 750 100 700 90 80 Depreciation 650 600 550 Appreciation 70 1996-2009 Average 500 450 Broad Nominal Effective Exchange Rate Index (March 1973 = 100) Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 11 / 21
The end of yen depreciation? May 19, 2013: The yen rebounded from a 4-1/2-year low against the dollar after Japan s Economy Minister Akira Amari said the yen s excessive strength had largely corrected and that further weakness could damage Japan s economy. - Reuters Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 12 / 21
Abenomics and Asian EM growth Impact of yen depreciation on Asian EMs growth is likely to be limited Constitutes less than 6% of gross global imports Major exporter of intermediate and capital goods to emerging asian economies; weaker yen decreases production costs Asian EM exports have have particularly high ratios of foreign-to-domestic value added; much of this foreign value added is attributed to Japan Decomposition of Gross Exports, 2004 Share of gross exports Japan US EU Canada Australia & NZ Singapore Taiwan Korea Hong Kong Philippines Malaysia Thailand Vietnam Indonesia Indoia Rest of South Asia Rest of East Asia accession countries South Africa Russia Rest of World Rest of Americas Brazil China normal China processing Mexico normal Mexico processing World average Advanced economies Asian NIEs Other EM Asia Other EMEs China Mexico 0 20 40 60 80 100 Source: Koopman et al. (2010) DVA FVA Sources of Value-Added for Asian Countries' Gross exports, 2004 Shares of domestic value-added (DVA) and foreign value-added (FVA) Electronic equipment Motor vehicles and parts Country DVA FVA FVA DVA o/w JPN o/w JPN China 60.5 39.5 10.1 63.4 36.6 8.8 Hong Kong 38.6 61.4 16.9 79.7 20.3 4.2 Indonesia 44.1 55.9 12.3 74.6 25.4 6.4 India 63.7 36.3 3.1 77.8 22.2 2.8 Korea 58.2 41.8 11.5 74.6 25.4 5.6 Malaysia 50.2 49.8 9.4 59.0 41.0 17.7 Philippines 52.9 47.1 14.5 52.6 47.4 17.0 Singapore 18.9 81.1 14.5 45.4 54.6 8.7 Thailand 42.1 57.9 15.0 56.0 44.0 18.3 Taiwan 53.8 46.2 12.2 59.3 40.7 18.6 Source: Koopman et al. (2010) and IMF 2011 Japan Spillover Report Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 13 / 21
Abenomics and Capital flows to Asian EMs Impact of yen depreciation on Japanese capital flows to Asian EMs is likely to be limited Japanese FDI and external lending have historically been insensitive to short-run changes in the level of the exchange rate Previous rounds of QE by the BOJ have not resulted in significant changes in private Japanese purchases of foreign assets Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 14 / 21
Asian EM competitiveness Little direct competition in final goods markets with EM Asian economies China shares<1/4 of its top export categories to the US with Japan This area of overlap accounts for<6% of Chinese total exports to US Overall Export Similarity Index vis-a-vis Japan Index between 0 and 1; 1 = identical export structures, 0 = completely dissimilar Germany Korea United States United Kingdom France Austria Italy Czech Republic Spain Thailand China Singapore Hong Kong Malaysia Philippines 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Source: From "Changing Patterns of Global Trade," IMF 2011 Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 15 / 21
Evidence from structural models In a recent report, Iacoviello and Lindé document simulations of expansionary monetary policy shocks among AFEs. EMEs responses are robust across several specifications of these simulations: Initial decrease in inflation, followed by steady increase over the baseline for several years following the AFEs policy intervention Increases in GDP, coupled with a rising real exchange rate Real imports grow above the baseline throughout the period considered in the simulations De Michelis and Iacoviello build on this model to analyze the effects of the BOJ s Quantitative and Qualitative Easing (QQE): only temporary increase in Japanese inflation significant increase in output, nearly half of which is due to the net exports account Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 16 / 21
Thank you! Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 17 / 21
Percent 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4-6 -8 Deviation of GDP from Long-run Trend -10 1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 18 / 21
Consumer Expectations of CPI Inflation Mean expected percent price change 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2.5% threshold for exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate Michigan Survey: 1-year Michigan Survey: 5-10 years 2 2% inflation target 0 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 19 / 21
5-year, 5-year Forward CPI Inflation Expectations Percent 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 20 / 21
10-year Breakeven Inflation Rate Percent 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas or the Federal Reserve System Rogers (FRB) Unconventional Monetary Policy May 27, 2013 21 / 21