The items noted below have been included or referenced in preparation for the August 5, 2009 meeting.

Similar documents
Agenda Item 3 Meeting Minutes Review and approval of the January 21, 2009 meeting minutes.

APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS

CIRCULATION ELEMENT ADOPTED 1980 REPUBLISHED APRIL 2014 County of Santa Barbara Planning and Development 123 E. Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101

4.4 TRAFFIC and CIRCULATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

SunPAC Traffic, Circulation, and Parking Goal-Making Matrix

4.9 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION

4.11 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION

Tonight we will be discussing accidents

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

4.11 TRANSPORTATION 4.11 TRANSPORTATION Environmental Setting Intersection, Roadway, and Freeway Evaluation Methodology

DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY BOULDER AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT CITY OF HIGHLAND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Report Purpose To seek Council s approval of the Wye Road Functional Planning Study (January 2015).

Planning Committee STAFF REPORT March 7, 2018 Page 2 of 4 The following MTSOs are being used across the five subregions: Intersection Level of Service

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

CarMax Auto Superstore/ Reconditioning Center #6002 Murrieta, California

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum

The Commissioner of Engineering and Public Works recommends:

GARLAND ROAD/GASTON AVENUE/ GRAND AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY NEWTOWN TOWNSHIP DELAWARE COUNTY, PA

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

STAFF REPORT. Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA #PLN

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } Decision and Order

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

REPORT CONCURRENCE. City Manager. The General Manager concurs with the recommendation of this report.

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Highway 111 Corridor Study

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

Chapter 16: Traffic and Parking A. INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 4: IDENTIFICATION OF ROAD SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL

Phone: Fax: Project Reference No. (to be filled out by MassHighway):

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

LYNNWOOD ROAD ARTERIAL STUDY The effect of intersection spacing on arterial operation

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

Chapter 6: Transportation

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

MINERAL AVENUE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT STUDY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

MEMORANDUM. To: 1.0 PURPOSE

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Task Force Meeting #5, August 3, Prepared by DKS Associates

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

Bridge Street Corridor Study Report

Traffic Impact Analysis

Capital Region Council of Governments


HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

LIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009

Provo City Transportation Master Plan

D.13 Transportation and Traffic

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING.

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Colerain Avenue Roadway Improvements. Sponsored by Hamilton County Engineer

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

Transcription:

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL MEMO DATE: July 30, 2009 TO: SunPAC Members FROM: Derek Johnson, Director Peter Imhof, Supervising Planner Holly Bradbury, Associate Planner SUBJECT: SunPAC Meeting #24- August 5, 2009 The items noted below have been included or referenced in preparation for the August 5, 2009 meeting. 1. Meeting Agenda. The agenda for the August 5, 2009 meeting has been provided for your review. For further explanation, please see discussion below. (Attachment 1) 2. Meeting Minutes. Action Minutes from the July 1, 2009 meeting are included for your review and approval. (Attachment 2) 3. 1992 PRT Map Summerland. Map that shows BOS-approved nonmotorized trails, recreation, and parks. (Attachment 3) 4. 1992 Circulation and Roadway Classification Map. From BOS-approved County-wide map. (Attachment 4) 5. Summerland Community Plan: Traffic, Circulation, and Parking. Circulation component of the 1992 Summerland Community Plan. (Attachment 5) 6. Lille Avenue Circulation and Parking Improvements Update. Status on Lille Avenue Improvements from the Public Works Department. (Attachment 6) 7. Lillie Avenue Phase 2B Streetscape Improvement Plan. (Attachment 7) 8. LUDC and County Code Parking Excerpts. (Attachment 8) 9. Greenwell Retaining Wall Layout. (Attachment 9) 10. County Encroachment Policy. (Attachment 10) 11. FAR Worksheet. (Attachment 11) 12. New Basement Graphics and Text. (Attachment 12) MEETING GOALS: Develop an understanding of the relationship of the Traffic, Circulation and Parking Chapter of the Summerland Community Plan and its influence on development in Summerland.

Develop an understanding of issues and concerns with current goals and policies in the chapter. Please refer to Transmittal materials provided to you for recent meetings. You may also download the materials at the following webpage: http://longrange.sbcountyplanning.org/planareas/summerland/sunpac.php MEETING AGENDA FOR AUGUST 5, 2009 Agenda Item 1 Pledge of Allegiance and Roll Call. Agenda Item 2 Public Comment period This time is set aside to allow public testimony on items not on today s agenda. The time allocated to each speaker will be set at the discretion of the Chair. Agenda Item 3 Administrative Items- Meeting Minutes: Review and approval of the July 1, 2009 draft meeting minutes. SBAR Review of Residential Design Guidelines: The SBAR review of the Guidelines was continued pending complete integration of the SunPAC revisions. Review is scheduled for the afternoon of August 28. Agenda Item 4 Traffic, Circulation, and Parking Background Information- 1. Terminology: Levels of Service (LOS): Operating conditions are described by level-of-service (LOS), which is derived by comparing traffic volumes with roadway capacity. LOS A represents the best traffic operation, while LOS F represents the worst. LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS LOS Definition A Free unobstructed flow, no delays; signal phases able to handle approaching vehicles B Stable flow, little delay, few phases unable to handle approaching vehicles. C Stable flow, low to moderate delays, full use of peak direction signal phases D Approaching unstable flow, moderate to heavy traffic delays, significant signal time deficiencies experienced for short durations during peak traffic period E Unstable flow, significant delays, signal phase timing is generally insufficient, extended congestion. F Forced flow, low travel speeds, and volumes well above capacity.

The acceptable LOS for roadways in the Summerland Planning Area is LOS B. An exception is Ortega Hill west of Highway 101 where LOS C is acceptable. Roadway Classification: Roadway classification in the Summerland Community Plan is divided into two main designations: Primary and Secondary roadways. Each of these main designations is further subdivided into three subclasses, dependent upon roadway size, function, and surrounding uses. Primary roadways serve mainly as principal access routes to major shopping areas, employment and community centers, etc., and often carry a large percentage of through traffic. The 1992 Plan does not designate any roadways within the community as primaries. Secondary roadways are two lane roads designed to provide principal access to residential areas or to connect streets of higher classifications to permit adequate traffic circulation. Such roadway may be fronted by a mixture of uses and generally carry a lower percentage of through traffic than primaries. Two types of secondary roads exist in the Summerland Community Plan area as indentified in the 1992 plan: Secondary 1 (S-1): Moderate to high non-residential use with moderate number of driveways or large residential lots with large setbacks and well-spaced driveways. Roadways are two lanes with infrequent curb cuts and signalized intersections with primary roadways. Secondary 3 (S-3): Roadways designed to primarily serve residential with small to medium lots. Roadways are two lanes with more frequent driveways. As defined by this Community Plan, the Acceptable Capacity for a given roadway is based upon its roadway classification, the acceptable level of service for that roadway, and the number of Special Roadway Condition Factors that have been applied. Please the Attachment 5, Circulation Map, for details on roadway classification in the Summerland Plan Area. Average Daily Trip (ADT): The unit measuring vehicular movement through which acceptable roadway capacity, roadway classification, and estimated future volume are measured in Summerland. Acceptable Capacity is defined as the maximum ADT s that are acceptable for the normal operations of a given roadway, based on roadway classification and acceptable LOS. The ADT is measured through a traffic count or may be estimated using SANDAG's Traffic Generation Guide. Peak Hour Trip: (PHT): The unit measuring vehicular movement through which impacts to estimated future LOS are measured. Impacts are often calculated based on if additional PHT created would significantly affect the V/C (volume/capacity) ratio. The PHT is measured through a traffic count or may be estimated using SANDAG's Traffic Generation Guide. 2. Status of Lillie Avenue Streetscape Plan: Phase 1 and 2A complete, see Attachment 6.

Phase 2B: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funding secured for Area 1 improvements, see Attachment 7 for more details. 3. Summaries of Recent Public Works Studies: Parking Study, June 14 and 17, 2008: The survey was completed during the Lillie Avenue and Ortega Hill Road parking improvements in response to community concerns about construction affecting parking. The study found that existing parking exceeds the current demand and no impact was observed on Varley Street and the residential roads north of Varley Street. The restaurants, Summerland Beach Café, Tinker s Burgers, Stacky s Seaside and the Nugget, created the highest demand for parking. The highest demand on both weekday and weekend peaked around 1 pm. If future demand does change and exceeds capacity, there are options that can be explored to meet the demand and prevent an impact to the residential streets to the north. Non-Maintained Roadway Review of Summerland, March 2007: Public Works completed an analysis of what improvements would be necessary to bring County owned, non-maintained streets into the County s Maintained Road System. The improvements would generally consist of widening, drainage upgrades, and pavement restoration. The total cost of the improvements would be approximately $2,687,827 and does not including geotechnical reports and engineering to address roadway stability issues. Focus Questions: How does the Traffic, Circulation and Parking Chapter influence development? What are important traffic, circulation, and parking issues in Summerland? How does the current streetscape improve Summerland? What other improvements would further improve Summerland circulation? Agenda Item 5 Public Works Transportation Division Guest Presentation- Dace Morgan, Deputy Director and Gary Smart, Traffic Operations Supervisor. Public Works staff will be giving a presentation with a focus on the following Summerland Community Plan polices: Policy CIRC-S-17: New encroachment of structures, fences, walls, landscaping, etc. into existing road rights-of-way shall not be permitted. Policy CIRC-S-18: Existing public rights-of-way shall not be abandoned.

Agenda Item 6 A few remaining items pertaining to the Summerland Residential Design Guidelines need to be resolved. The remaining items include: 1. Basement definition and graphics. 2. FAR worksheet. Please see Attachment 11 and 12 for revised graphics and language. Adjourn Next meeting: SunPAC Community Plan Update Meeting #25 Topic: Phase III, Traffic, Circulation, and Parking Update Development Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 5:00 PM Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, 4th Floor CC: Jeremy Tittle, Executive Assistant, 1 st District Office Dace Morgan, Deputy Director - Public Works Transportation Division Gary Smart, Traffic Operations Supervisor- Public Works Transportation Division