Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Similar documents
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Action Item III-A. February 12, 2015

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Information Item III-A. March 12, 2015

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

4 Ridership Growth Study

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Integrating Community Development and Transportation Strategies. November 13, 2014


Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

DALLAS MIDTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOCUS NORTH TEXAS Peer Chacko, AICP, Assistant Director, City of Dallas

Replacement Parking and BART TOD

MEETING Agenda. Introductions. Project Overview. Key Study Components. Alternative Station Concepts. Preferred Station Concept. Next Steps.

Capital Improvement Project Application: Bike Racks, Bus Stop Shelters, Sidewalks in Kings Canyon/Ventura Corridor Page 1 of 10

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

Stakeholder Meeting Handouts. January 2013

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Birmingham Connected. Edmund Salt. Transportation Policy Birmingham City Council

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Setting the Standard: An Introduction to Bicycle Accessibility to Transit Agencies

CHAPTER 7 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION Mobility for all Modes

EVAN GLASS. Montgomery County Council District 5

First and Last Mile Plan. April 2016

JOINT PARTNERSHIPS: Working Together To Support Light Rail in Santa Monica

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Section 9. Implementation

Living Streets Policy

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

Good TOD. July 7, 2016 SPUR

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

FY2006 Budget Board Budget Committee request for information. Board Request: Detailed information on bus route 5A DC-Dulless Airport

5. Transit Oriented Development. Fact Sheet

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

Develop a Multi-Modal Transportation Strategy (Theme 6)

Climate Change Action Plan: Transportation Sector Discussion Paper: Cycling

Appendix 1 Transit Network Analysis

MAYFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Workshop

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

SMART 1 Public Meeting #1. February 24, 2016

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2012

Seattle Transit Master Plan

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

REGULAR MEETING of the San Mateo County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (SMCBPAC) Thursday, October 20, 2016

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Nomination. Halton Region in Context

MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Planning for tennis in your Local Government Area. A resource from Tennis Australia

Transit-Driven Complete Streets

our pedestrian future Lance Schulte

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

lowercase tod Rail~Volution October 22, 2013 Melanie Hare

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

3 FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF LAKE-TO-LAKE CYCLING ROUTE

ABOUT THE PROJECT. DOWNTOWN WEST Transportation Planning Study. Pennsylvania Ave. NW: H Street NW: Farragut. K St. NW. North. I St.

Characteristics from these programs were used to compare to and evaluate existing conditions in Howard County.

Exit 13/Golden Triangle Study FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Active Transportation Connections to Transit

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

Where We Live and Work Today

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

York Region Population and Employment Growth

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Prioritizing Transportation Policy and Funding for Active Transportation, Safety, Equity and Health

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

North Coast Corridor:

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

Prince George s County Council Retreat January 5, 2017

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Complete Streets implementation in Chicagoland

What Are The Benefits? How RIDERSHIP + Can Help You. Select RIDERSHIP + Projects

Transcription:

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee Item III - B April 12, 2018 WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives Page 24 of 76

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD Number: 201975 Resolution: Yes No TITLE: WMATA's Transit-Oriented Development Objectives PRESENTATION SUMMARY: Staff will present three proposed transit-oriented development (TOD) objectives which can be enacted upon by private entities, jurisdictional partners, and in some cases, by Metro. PURPOSE: Staff requests Board approval of the proposed transit-oriented development objectives. DESCRIPTION: Transit-oriented development (TOD) is a general term to describe intermodal, compact, mixed-use, and pedestrian-friendly development within proximity to a fixed-rail station and a major bus corridor. There is general concensus and support for TOD across the region, which is reflected in the Washington Metropolitan Council of Government's "Region Forward" goals: "the region seeks transit-oriented and mixed-use communities emerging in Regional Activity Centers that will capture new employment and household growth." However, each of the local jurisdictions manage and approve their local land use plans, which provide specific guidance on how development occurs within the jurisdiction. Through the adoption of TOD objectives, Metro would like to share its perspective on which land use policies and infrastructure improvements increase Metro ridership and contribute to Metro's long-term financial health. TOD directly benefits Metro because residential and commercial proximity to transit services correlates with higher usage of transit services by residents and workers living and working near Metrorail and Metrobus stations. Specifically, the TOD policies that promote transit ridership the most are density, mix of uses, and walkability. While Metro does not have a direct role in local land use policy-making, Metro can be helpful to the region with TOD objectives that provide guidance to jurisdictional partners on what would be most beneficial to the Metro system over the long-term. Key Highlights: Page 25 of 76

- Metro has proposed TOD objectives for areas in proximity to Metrorail stations and major bus corridors. - The direct benefits to Metro of TOD include: increased bus and rail ridership, improved bike and pedestrian connections to transit, and integrated transit services within local communities. - The specific objectives for properties around Metrorail stations and along major bus corridors include: achieving higher densities of development and a mix of uses; increasing investment in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure; and encouraging development at Metro's suburban Metrorail stations. Background and History: Metro has evaluated the transit-oriented development strategies that most support transit ridership, the most impactful of which are: (1) addressing underutilized development capacity by working with jurisdictions as they pursue land-related actions that will result in ridership growth; and (2) working with local jurisdictions to develop policies and plans that support TOD and balance travel demand. The proposed TOD objectives advance the aforementioned strategies into actionable guidance, which can be used by members of the Board when advocating for TOD in their respective jurisdictions, as well as by Metro staff when coordinating with the local jurisdictions and providing input to local land use plans, small area plans, and comprehensive plans. The proposed TOD objectives should serve as clear guidance on the investments or land use policies that would maximize transit ridership for Metro. Discussion: Transit-oriented development around Metrorail stations on both private and public land has direct benefit to Metro. Specifically, the greater the density and walkability of development near and around transit, the greater the ridership and revenue potential for Metro, because people living and working within walking distance of a fixed-rail station and major bus corridors tend to use transit more frequently and consistently. Metro has seen the direct impacts of TOD on its ridership. For example, the joint development of Rhode Island Ave Metro Station with 274 residential units and 68,000 square feet of retail has increased ridership at Rhode Island Ave Metro Station by 617 boardings per year (comparing 3,405 average daily boardings in 2011 to 4,022 average daily boarding in 2016). Striving to maximize development potential around each and every Metro station, as well as connect development by safe pedestrian and bicycle paths, will generate new ridership for Metro. If adopted and implemented throughout the region, the three objectives Page 26 of 76

that support transit ridership the most are: (1) Updating local zoning codes and ordinances to achieve higher densities of development, mix of uses, and lower parking requirements; (2) Investing in pedestrian and bicycle improvements to Metrorail stations and major bus corridors; and (3) Encouraging counter-commuting strategies, such as developing employment centers, commercial, retail and other uses that draw transit riders to suburban Metrorail stations. The above objectives are not actions that Metro can achieve on its own, nor does Metro own most of the land that surrounds Metro stations. Instead, the TOD objectives are Metro's guidance to the local jurisdictions, local planners, developers, and internal staff on the land use policies and infrastructure investments that support transit ridership the most. Also by articulating specific TOD strategies, Board members and Metro staff will have clarity as to what maximizes benefit to Metro as they are advocating for TOD. FUNDING IMPACT: The Board action is a policy action, not a project or operational action with budgetary consequences. The result of the proposed Board policy could increase transit ridership (and therefore fare revenue) over time, but the Board policy does not incur any immediate expense or cost, nor produce any immediate revenue. Project Manager: Nina Albert Project Department/Office: TIMELINE: CFO/LAND Previous Actions Anticipated actions after presentation 2013 - Board adoption of Metro's Strategic Plan, 2013-2025 No specific actions RECOMMENDATION: - Board approval of the proposed transit-oriented development objectives. Page 27 of 76

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives Capital & Strategic Planning Committee April 12, 2018 Page 28 of 76

Purpose Request Board approval of transit-oriented development objectives Page 29 of 76 2

Background Transit-Oriented Developments are compact nodes of development within a 10-minute walk of transit Basic TOD principles: intermodal, mixed-use, density, pedestrian-friendly Page 30 of 76 3

Precedents Supporting TOD Washington Metropolitan Council of Governments Region Forward Goals Region seeks transit-oriented and mixed-use communities emerging in Regional Activity Centers that will capture new employment and household growth Metro s Strategic Plan 2013 2025 (Momentum) Strategies for Goal 3: Improve Regional Mobility and Connect Communities Address underutilized capacity by working with jurisdictions as they pursue land-related actions that will result in ridership growth Work with local jurisdictions to develop policies and plans that support TOD and balance travel demand Page 31 of 76 4

Direct Benefits of TOD to Metro Increases bus and rail ridership and fare revenue Maximizes bike and pedestrian connections to transit Integrates transit services within communities Supports the jurisdictions that support Metro by delivering multiple benefits, such as: Increased economic activity and tax revenues Maximizes use of existing infrastructure Environmental sustainability benefits Congestion management benefits Cost of living choices and benefits Page 32 of 76 5

TOD Policies that Matter: Density and Walkability Rhode Island Ave 2015 PUD Proposal: 1,631 housing units 300,000 sq ft of retail Approved Project: 1,450 housing units 250,000 sq ft retail Estimated Impact to Metro: -200 trips per weekday -$121,500 annual revenue foregone Page 33 of 76 6

Metro s Role in TOD Planning support: Provide data to the jurisdictions as they develop their policies and plans for TOD and balance travel demand Advocacy and collaboration: Advocate for WMATA s TOD objectives and collaborate with local governments in the region to achieve these objectives Joint Development: Apply WMATA s TOD objectives for its own joint development projects Page 34 of 76 7

Proposed Transit-Oriented Development Objectives 1. Zoning codes and ordinances Metro encourages jurisdictional partners to update local zoning codes and ordinances to achieve higher densities of development, mix of uses, and lower parking requirements around Metrorail stations and along major bus corridors 2. Pedestrian and bicycle access Metro supports investment in pedestrian and bicycle improvements to better connect the areas in proximity to Metrorail stations and major bus corridors 3. TOD in less developed areas Metro encourages employment centers, commercial, retail, and other uses that draw riders to all suburban Metrorail stations Page 35 of 76 8

Recommendation Board approval of transit-oriented development objectives Page 36 of 76 9

Page 37 of 76

ATTACHMENT A WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY S TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ( WMATA or Metro ) encourages transit-oriented development around its stations (whether on Metro-owned property or property owned by others) to increase transit ridership, thereby furthering Metro s mission. This document defines WMATA s transit-oriented development objectives for the Washington region, understanding that achieving these objectives requires the local jurisdictions to implement them and that WMATA s role is one of support and advocacy. 1.0 Definition. Transit-Oriented Development or TOD includes a mix of commercial, residential, office and entertainment uses within a safe walking distance of Metrorail stations and of major bus corridors. TOD includes higher density, walkable, mixed-use development near transit that attracts people and contributes to vibrant, connected communities. 2.0 Direct Benefits of TOD to Metro. TOD has direct, measurable benefits to Metro and its communities. These include but are not limited to: A) Increases to the number of and frequency of use by transit riders, which strengthens Metro s fare revenue and financial position; B) Maximizes safe bike and pedestrian connectivity to transit, thereby reducing the total amount of parking required at a station for an equivalent or higher amount of ridership; C) Integrates transit services within communities, making transit more accessible and easy to use; D) Directly supports the jurisdictions that support Metro by delivering: 3.0 WMATA s Role Increased economic activity and tax revenues Maximized use of existing infrastructure Multiple environmental and sustainability benefits Congestion management benefits Cost of living choices and benefits A) Planning support. WMATA will work with local jurisdictions to support their policies and plans for TOD and balance travel demand. Page 1 Page 38 of 76

ATTACHMENT A B) Advocacy and collaboration. WMATA will advocate for the TOD objectives in Section 4.0 and collaborate with local governments in the region to achieve these objectives. C) Joint Development. WMATA will apply these TOD objectives for its own joint development projects. 4.0 WMATA s TOD Objectives A) Zoning codes and ordinances. WMATA encourages jurisdictional partners to update local zoning codes and ordinances to enhance TOD around Metrorail stations and along major bus corridors. In those areas, WMATA supports higher density of development, a mix of uses, economic development incentives, context-sensitive parking requirements, and increased investment in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure. B) Pedestrian and bicycle access. Successful TOD depends on seamless and safe access to transit. More than 60% of Metrorail s current riders walk to their Metrorail station. WMATA supports investment in pedestrian and bicycle access improvements that maximize quantity of safe walking and biking connections to Metrorail stations and major bus corridors. C) Promoting TOD in less developed areas. WMATA encourages daytime employment centers, commercial, retail, and other uses that draw riders to suburban Metrorail stations. This strategy also supports WMATA s Boardadopted priority action of generating counter-commuting riders. Page 2 Page 39 of 76