Bus Queue Jump (Lane) Utilization: A case study in Calgary, AB Canada Muhammad Asim P.Eng, M.Sc. The City of Calgary

Similar documents
Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Short-Term Enhancements Improvements to keep Austin moving. MetroRapid

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

ALTERNATIVE A ONLY. Right Turn Only. BOTH ALTERNATIVES on southbound Mission from 23rd St to 25th St and on northbound Mission from 20th St to 23rd St

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Transit Priority Program: Putting Buses First

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

1. Provide a dedicated westbound approach bus lane at the intersection;

Having held a public hearing, that Council approve:

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

I 35 Xpress Bus on Shoulder

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Light Rail Transit in North Central Calgary Open House and Workshop Summary. Summer 2013

TRB Managed Lanes Conference May 22 24, 2012, Oakland, CA

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Transit Signal Preemption and Priority Treatments

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Roadways. Roadways III.

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

WHAT IS BRT? Jack M. Gonsalves, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. February 22, 2012

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

The Bay Bridge Corridor Congestion Study

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

Scheduling 101 Calculating Running Time Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Multimodal Operations Workshop Houston, TX

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

North Coast Corridor:

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Enclosure 1. Crimson Drive Traffic Safety and Calming Review Report

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Regional Bus Priority

19 July 2016 OUR REF:

IMPACT OF TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY (TSP) ON BUS TRAVEL TIMES, LATE BUS RECOVERY, DELAY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS)

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

LOOP 360 IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

ON STREET TRANSIT PRIORITY MEASURES PUTTING BUSES FIRST IN WINNIPEG

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

North Vancouver Community Associations Network. November 15, pm to 9 pm

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

A Comprehensive HCM 2010 Urban Streets Analysis Using HCS 2010 US 31W in Elizabethtown, KY

CAMBRIDGE SOUTH WEST PARK & RIDE

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Presentation to the City of Ottawa Transit Commission. February 20, 2013

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

Joseph Iacobucci. James Czarnecky, AICP

395 Express Lanes Extension

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Santa Clara I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Mineral Avenue Corridor Assessment. ITE 2017 Western District Annual Meeting San Diego, CA June 21 st

September 20, 2016 L Taraval Rapid Project SFMTA Board of Directors Meeting

Bus Lanes and Pre-signals with Transit Signal Priority: Domains of Application

Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House!

Moving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

Creating the Future Bruce B Downs Blvd

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

41st Avenue B-Line Kerrisdale Village Street Improvements

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

I-25 PEL: CO Springs Denver South Connection. Presentation to Castle Rock Town Council

Baseline Road Rapid Transit: Bayshore Station to Prince of Wales Drive

BLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: Ontario Limited.

Transcription:

Bus Queue Jump (Lane) Utilization: A case study in Calgary, AB Canada Muhammad Asim P.Eng, M.Sc. The City of Calgary 1

Presentation Outline Introduction to Calgary Transit Background of the Project (why we did that) Evaluation Feedback from the operators and customers Utilization study Methodology Results Conclusions/Lessons learned Recommendation 2

Calgary & Transit Calgary Transit Route Information Map Calgary Transit Population 1.24 million Light Rail Transit 2 Lines/45 stations 59.9 kms Customers 110 million per year Service Hours 2.85 million per year Regular bus service (>150 routes) Express bus service (>10 routes) Bus Rapid Transit (5 routes) 3

Transit Priority Measures And Vision of Transit bus service Reduce congesti ons Travel Time Reliabil ity Short Travel Time Sched ule Adhere nce High LOS Less environment impacts Benefits/Effectiveness Transitway Shoulder bus lanes Bus queue jump lanes Transit exempt movements Transit Signal priority (TSP) Implementations 4

Bus Queue Jump(Lanes): Concepts Bus Queue Jump Lane Bus Queue Jump Source:Wikipedia.org/wiki/queue_jump 5

Project Location: Centre St McKnight Blvd

Centre St-McKnigth Bus Queue Jump Lanes Before Centre Street North is a critical transit corridor ~ 90 buses/ peak hour Carries about 35,000 passenger/day (17,500 veh/weekday) After serves150,000 residents of north-central Calgary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8k8 onjrj2o Travel time Savings:25% - 30% (1.5 to 2 minutes/trip) Schedule Reliability improvement: 45% 7

Calgary Transit Operators Feedback The bus queue jump lanes are beneficial..! We are satisfied with the bus queue jump lane..! These bus queue jump lanes save travel time...! Ridership has increased with the queue jump lanes.!

Calgary transit customers Comments These lanes should have been implemented a long time ago It saves us lot of time We are happy with reaching home earlier in afternoon We are happy that we can bypass a lot of traffic Faster service

Problem Studies are conducted to verify the benefits gained, i.e. travel time savings. But no studies are done to verify utilization of queue jump lanes 10

Bus Queue Jump Utilization Study Methodology: Transit operator s survey Field observation Source: http://www.learnaboutair.com/geography/section_02.html 11

CT operators Survey: Bus Queue Jump Utilization by time of day Bus lanes are mostly used during peak periods. Operators use bus lanes when they are behind schedule. Operators use the bus lanes when general lanes are congested. Off-Peak Use 15% PM Peak Use 51% AM Peak Use 34% 12

CT operators Survey: Reasons for not using the bus queue jump lanes The bus lane is congested with the transit buses. 9% The bus lane is congested with the right turning vehicle 35% It is difficult to merge back into the traffic at It takes longer to reach the next stop using the bus lane 4% 13

CT operators Survey: Comfort in merging back at end of the bus lanes Motorists are Cooperative 26% Easy 30% Frequency 10 8 6 4 2 0 Merging Delays 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% Delays (Secc) Average Delay: 24 Sec Very Difficult 7% Difficult 37% 14

Field Observation: Actual Bus queue jump Utilization NORTHBOUND/SOUTHBOUND Time of Day Auto Bus Buses used the Bus lane Compliance & Bus Delays AM Peak (7:00-9:00) Afternoon OFF Peak (11:00-13:00) PM Peak (16:00-18:00) Volume (#) Passengers Volume (#) Passengers (#) % of Total bus volume Did not Yield to bus (#) Compliance rate (%) Delay to bus (sec/veh) Total Delay to buses (Sec) Probability of a bus delayed by incompliant motorist 15

Field Observation: Actual Bus queue jump Utilization Southbound Bus lane Utilization Northbound Bus lane Utilization AM Peak Afternoon OFF Peak, 28%, 49% Afternoo n OFF Peak, 4% PM Peak, 0% AM Peak, 17% PM Peak, 16% AM Peak Afternoon OFF Peak PM Peak AM Peak Afternoon OFF Peak PM Peak 16

Field Observation: Motorists Behaviour to Transit Buses Yield to bus rate (Northbound) Yield to bus rate (Southbound) AM Peak, - Afterno on OFF Peak, 99.8 % PM Peak, 98.9% AM Peak, 99.6% Afterno on OFF Peak PM Peak, 100.0% AM Peak Afternoon OFF Peak PM Peak AM Peak Afternoon OFF Peak PM Peak Average Delay: 3-6 sec/trip 17

Conclusions The bus queue jump lanes are not well utilized, due to the following reasons: Right turn control: Yield Control & Right turning traffic sharing the bus lanes Stop type& location: Bus Stops and Time point in the queue jump lanes High transit bus volume in corridor Short receiving lanes Insufficient signage 18

Recommendations Make the signage effective. Like active Yield to Transit. Choose the type of queue jump carefully at the planning stage. (Bus queue jump lane or queue jump, right turn control/geometry) Consider designing each element of bus queue jump (lane) from utilization perspective. Develop a indication system for operators to direct them when and when not to use the queue jump, depending on various real time conditions. If possible, avoid providing bus stops in the bus lane. Provide a bus lay by in addition to the bus lane if needed. 19

Thank You!! QUESTIONS?? Contact info: Asim, Muhammad Muhammad.asim@calgary.ca; maasim@hotmail.ca ; Office:+1 (403) 268-3441; Cell: +1 (403) 966-4800 20