Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

Similar documents
Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Evaluation of Alternatives and Final Screening Results November 20 and 21, 2013

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

REDWOOD CITY STREETCAR - ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

WEST SEVENTH COMMUNITY INFORMATION SESSION

Bus Rapid Transit Symposium. THOMAS CENTER SPANISH COURT October 14, 2008

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

Regional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Creating the Future Bruce B Downs Blvd

Hennepin/First Transportation Study

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Community Engagement Process

Purpose + Need. Connect: Thrive: Develop: < Strengthen the spine of our regional transportation system

Van Ness Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) San Francisco Environment Commission Policy Committee

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROBLEM STATEMENT PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED Study Purpose Study Need... 4

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

Hennepin Avenue Reconstruction Washington Avenue to 12 th Street

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

Item B1 November 19, 2009

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Employment 8,881 17,975 9,094. Households 18,990 31,936 12,946

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Route 79/Davol Street Corridor Study

Gina M. M. Thomas. HDR, Transit Engineer Seattle, WA

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

NORTH TURNAROUND. Recommended Design: Expand the existing transit terminal

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Draft EIS/EIR Public Hearing (September 1 thru October 16, 2017

SFMTA SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Gratiot Avenue Transit Study Tech Memo #4: Ridership

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

CDOT s Transportation Plan for the Obama Presidential Center in Jackson Park

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TexRail Truth. The real story of pork politics, government waste and taxpayer abuse in Tarrant County. December 10, 2014!

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

6 Screen 3 Analysis and Results

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

MARTA Expansion Update

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

Item Description: Presentation and Discussion: Berkeley Rapid Transit Locally Preferred Alternative

Appendix 3.2 D. Ridership Errata Sheet

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

New Seward and 36 th Avenue Intersection Conceptual Design

Locally Preferred Alternative Report May 27, North-South Corridor Study

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Rightsizing Streets: The Seattle Experience

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Terwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan

Chapter 4: Transportation Systems

Westside Transportation Access Needs Assessment - Short and Long Term Improvements

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

Tunnel Reconstruction South 5 th Street Association October 16, 2018

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2012

BEAR CREEK PARK AND RIDE

Transcription:

Topics To Be Covered Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

Tier 2 Council Direction Dismiss Bus Rapid Transit along the Union Pacific Railroad Dismiss Bus Rapid Transit on Mill/Kyrene (shared lane) Dismiss Light Rail on Rural Road (shared lane) Advance Modern Streetcar on Mill/Southern Advance Bus Rapid Transit on Rural Road

What s Changed? Prop 400 Delay in Implementation 1 year Fiscal Crisis FTA Small Starts evaluation criteria; equally weighted Cost effectiveness Land use Existing land use Measured in population and employment densities with ¼ and ½ mile of proposed development Economic Development Plans, policies Effectiveness of plans, policies

Tonight s Focus Mill Avenue Streetcar Analysis

Mill Avenue Modern Streetcar

Corridor Refinement of downtown Tempe Alignment Technical Analysis Included: Ridership Land use Economic development Capital costs Traffic impacts Utilities Alignment Options: Mill Avenue Double track Ash Avenue A third alternative emerged as a result of analyses Time period analyzed: Opening year Not analyzed but significant: 2025 and beyond

Mill and Ash Avenue Double Track Alternatives

Mill-Ash Avenue One- Way Loop Alternative

What is Modern Streetcar? Fixed-guideway electric rail system Operates in mixed traffic Articulated for tight radii turns Smaller then light rail vehicle 130 passengers per vehicle (35 seated / 95 standing) Typically operates as a single car unit Simple stations Catalyst for economic development

One Way Street with Single Streetcar Track Portland Pearl District

Two Way Street with Single Streetcar Track Northwest Portland

Two Way Street With Two Tracks in Outside Lanes Seattle South Lake Union

Two Way Street With Two Tracks in Center Lanes Seattle South Lake Union

Streetcar Stop Curb Loading Portland Typically 4 to 6 stops per mile

Streetcar Stop Street Median Seattle Portland

2017 Daily Boardings Comparison Mill Ave Double Track Ash Ave Double Track Loop Alternative Low 1,500 1,200 1,200 High 1,900 1,500 1,500 Based on June 2010 bus service assumptions

Existing and Approved Land Use Zoning within ½ mile of study corridors Mill Avenue Ash Avenue Acres Percent Acres Percent City Center 132 7 132 7 Commercial 95 5 98 5 Industrial 290 16 276 15 Mixed-use 106 6 104 6 Residential 1,213 66 1,284 68 TOTAL 1,835 100 1,892 100 Source: City of Tempe, HDR

Existing Employment Employment within ¼ and ½ mile of study corridors Mill Avenue Double Track Ash Avenue Double Track Loop Alternative Businesses within ½-mile 517 536 538 Number of employees 23,834 23,862 24,482 Businesses within ¼-mile 317 337 340 Number of employees 9,104 8,560 9,370 Source: MAG Employer Database (2007)

Major Employers (2007) Findings Economic Development LEGEND >500 100 500 20 100

Comparative Capital Costs ($2010) Mill Ave Double Track ($M) Ash Ave Double Track ($M) Loop Alternative ($M) Low estimate $119.1 $121.9 $115.4 High estimate $130.7 $134.1 $123.2 Does not include planning and NEPA costs

Traffic Analysis Critical Concerns Mill Avenue Double Track Southbound Mill Avenue in PM peak Bus traffic on Mill Avenue Ash Avenue Double Track and Mill/Ash Loop Eastbound University in PM peak Traffic diversion into neighborhoods

Utilities: 5 th and Mill

Utilities: University Ash to Mill

Parking Assessment Existing inventory Mill Avenue 70 parking spaces Ash Avenue 35 parking spaces 5 th Street (between Ash and Mission Palms) 28 parking spaces Example of alternative parking Reconfigure 5 th street from parallel to diagonal parking This configuration would increase inventory to 40-50 parking spaces Range depends on: Bus stop locations Loading zones

Consultation with PD, Fire and Special Event staff concluded no significant impacts to special events Loop option offers ultimate flexibility to accommodate special events Special Events

Why Mill/Ash Avenue Loop? Helps define downtown Opportunity to stimulate development/redevelopment on west side of downtown Avoids utility impacts Reduced parking impacts Offers flexibility for special events Minimizes construction impacts on Mill Lowest cost Draft Staff Recommendations Mill/Ash Avenue Loop

Seek Council Direction Mill Double Track Ash Double Track Mill/Ash Loop

Public Meeting Tempe South High Capacity Transit Study Thursday, September 23, 2010 MADCAP Theatres 730 S. Mill Avenue, Tempe 6:00 6:45 p.m. open house 6:45 7:00 p.m. presentation 7:00 8:00 p.m. comment period

Next Steps Approval Process Study Findings/Recommendation Oct. 21, 2010 Mill Avenue Streetcar - LPA Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Commuter Rail Discuss Funding Options Seek Council Adoption of Study Regional actions METRO Board of Directors November 2010 MAG Regional Council December 2010 Prepare federal funding application Spring 2011

Design Definition Connection to the Operations and Maintenance Facility (OMC) Traffic lane configuration On-street parking Bicycle lanes Street lighting and OSC Left turn requirements Pedestrian access points Station location and design

Mill Avenue Cross Section 2 lanes with streetcar in through lanes (south of 5 th Street)

Mill Avenue Cross Section 4 lanes with streetcar in right through lanes (south of 5 th Street)

Loop Cross Section

Ash Avenue Cross Section 2 lanes with streetcar in through lanes (south of 5 th Street)