Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Similar documents
Kennedy Plaza and Providence Downtown Transit Connector PUBLIC MEETING. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

ALTERNATIVES TO BE CONSIDERED

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Item Description: Presentation and Discussion: Berkeley Rapid Transit Locally Preferred Alternative

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Purpose + Need. Connect: Thrive: Develop: < Strengthen the spine of our regional transportation system

Roadways. Roadways III.

Better Market Street Project. Project Update January 15, 2015

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Item B1 November 19, 2009

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Southside Pilot Proposal

Station Plan: Penn & 43rd Avenue

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES TABLES. Executive Summary Report: BLUE LINE

MBTA Key Bus Route. Community Meeting Route 1 - Cambridge

STADIUM DISTRICT CENTER PLATFORM TACOMA LINK EXPANSION. Existing bus stop remains. Existing parallel parking removed for bus access.

GEARY CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT Environmental Analysis. Special Intersections: Preliminary Concepts

Vision. Goals and Objectives. Walking

Transportation, Parking & Roads

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Aurora Corridor to E Line

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

C C C

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

Short-Term Enhancements Improvements to keep Austin moving. MetroRapid

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

North Coast Corridor:

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

M14A/D Select Bus Service

Paoli Road Improvement Feasibility Study

Geneva-Harney Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study

Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project

Project Description Form 8AA

Bellevue Downtown Association Downtown Bike Series

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

MAYFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Workshop

MEMORANDUM. Earl Haugen and UND Transportation and Traffic Coordination Committee

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Agenda Staff Report

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Final EIS

ALTERNATIVES SCREENING REPORT

Feasibility Study. Expo-Downtown Bicycle Connector

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

North Avenue Corridor Study

Develop a Multi-Modal Transportation Strategy (Theme 6)

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

North Avenue Corridor Study

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Classification Criteria

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

Transcription:

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2 Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016 February 2017 1

AGENDA 1 DTC Goals and Expectations 2 Street Design Concepts 3 Potential Benefits and Impacts 4 Branding Concepts 5 Next Steps 2

1. DTC GOALS AND EXPECTATIONS 3

WHAT IS THE DTC? Enhanced transit corridor will provide fast, frequent connections through downtown Providence Align 7 existing bus routes Range of enhanced bus features creates faster, more reliable, more appealing service Six stations at major nodes in downtown 4

WHAT WILL THE DTC ACCOMPLISH? Quantity of Service Quality of Service 5

HOW IS SUCCESS MEASURED? More direct connections Better on-time performance for DTC routes Better customer satisfaction More positive view toward transit from future customers Increased ridership Due to better service 6

2. STREET DESIGN CONCEPTS 7

STREET DESIGN GOALS Transit priority Dedicated space for buses where feasible, especially along the most congested segments Complete streets approach Safe and convenient access both along AND across the corridor for pedestrians and bicyclists Minimize conflicts between buses and pedestrians, especially for turns Maintain traffic flow for autos and trucks 8

STRIKING A BALANCE Private Autos Traffic flow On-street parking Transit Priority Bus lanes Larger stations Pedestrian & Bicycle Sidewalk width Bicycle infrastructure DTC Design 9

TRANSIT PRIORITY CHALLENGES Dorrance St. through Downcity Narrow cross-section On-street parking is highly utilized Sidewalk width is already narrow for downtown setting Buildings constructed to back of sidewalk 10

TRANSIT PRIORITY OPPORTUNITIES Dorrance St. through Downcity Transit lanes would require parking removal Narrow cross-section north of Pine can fit a transit lane in one direction only (but wider sidewalk) Traffic signal priority could be installed Station amenities with wider sidewalk ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF MAXIMUM TRANSIT PRIORITY Transit-only lanes Mixed traffic lanes DRAFT FOR ANALYSIS ONLY 11

TRANSIT PRIORITY CHALLENGES Dyer St. through LINK District Not as narrow as Dorrance St. Newly-reconstructed section Northbound left turn onto Dorrance requires lane shift for buses 12

TRANSIT PRIORITY OPPORTUNITIES Dyer St. through LINK District Transit lanes in both directions could be established Partial removal of on-street parking required for transit lanes Construct station near Ship St. Possible queue jump at mid-block crosswalk ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF MAXIMUM TRANSIT PRIORITY Transit-only lanes Mixed traffic lanes DRAFT FOR ANALYSIS ONLY 13

TRANSIT PRIORITY CHALLENGES Eddy St. Narrow cross-section Parking lane is narrower than travel lane Sidewalk width is already narrow Buildings constructed to back of sidewalk Eddy St. Elm St. South St. 14

TRANSIT PRIORITY OPPORTUNITIES Eddy St. Transit lanes in both directions could be established north of South St. Existing bicycle lanes would require removal for transit lanes Construct station south of Point Street to serve future development ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF MAXIMUM TRANSIT PRIORITY Transit-only lanes Mixed traffic lanes Eddy St. DRAFT FOR ANALYSIS ONLY Elm St. South St. 15

TRANSIT PRIORITY OPPORTUNITIES 16

STATION REQUIREMENTS Space for two buses simultaneously Dedicated transit lane at stations Consistent branding Platforms for northbound and southbound travel located in close proximity to each other 17

CHALLENGES IN SITING STATIONS Narrow sidewalks leaves little room for amenities Buildings constructed to back of sidewalk leaves no room for expansion Driveways limit length available for bus boarding area 18

OPPORTUNITIES IN SITING STATIONS Stations can be located / designed in coordination with other development projects Station design can be linked to other streetscape design efforts 19

TRAIN STATION TERMINUS Dependent on location of Providence Intermodal Transit Center (PITC) Will serve as connecting hub for more routes than those operating through the DTC DTC corridor design on Exchange St. dependent on PITC location 20

HOSPITAL DISTRICT TERMINUS Exploring locations on-street and off-street near RI Hospital Layover space at or near terminus required for up to two buses Future Dudley Street Extension offers new turnaround / layover option 21

KENNEDY PLAZA STATION AND ALIGNMENT To be determined in conjunction with City / RIDOT planning effort Street design approaching Kennedy Plaza dependent on alignment through Kennedy Plaza City-sponsored public meeting on February 16 22

BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE Bikeshare stations planned at DTC stations Narrow streets prohibit comprehensive bike lane provisions on DTC Shared bus-bike lane not desirable due to bus volumes Focus on logical bike lanes where space available and connections to the DTC 23

PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE Wider sidewalk on Exchange St. Possible wider sidewalks in portions of Downcity in the vicinity of DTC station Station layout and amenities need to consider adjacent sidewalk space 24

3. BENEFITS AND IMPACTS OF TRANSIT PRIORITY STRATEGIES 25

Benefits and Impacts of Transit Priority Strategies Movement through corridor Access within corridor 26

MOVEMENT THROUGH CORRIDOR Key Benefits Extending routes beyond Kennedy Plaza will provide more direct (one-seat) rides to train station and Hospital District o Transfers eliminated for many riders Transit priority treatments will mean faster, more reliable service 27

MOVEMENT THROUGH CORRIDOR Travel Time Kennedy Plaza to Rhode Island Hospital (weekday evening peak hour) Existing Conditions DTC Service Plan WITHOUT Transit Priority Strategies DTC Service Plan with Transit Priority Strategies Travel time (Bus) Routes 1 & 3 (Inbound) Routes 1 & 3 (Outbound) 8:32 11:09 9:53 (16% increase) 12:21 (11% increase) 7:42 (10% reduction) 8:21 (25% reduction) Travel time (Auto) Eddy/Dyer/Dorrance (Inbound) Eddy/Dyer/Dorrance (Outbound) 5:07 5:39 5:24 (6% increase) 5:57 (5% increase) 4:46 (7% reduction) 5:23 (5% reduction) Transit Priority Strategies scenario includes full extent of transit-only lanes where possible 28

ACCESS WITHIN CORRIDOR Key Benefits High frequency service within this fast growing corridor will provide residents, workers and visitors increased mobility o Roughly 2,000 new residents moving into corridor over next three years; about 1,500 new employees in corridor over next three years Passenger amenities, distinctly branded stations and intuitive service will also attract new riders High frequency transit service brings more people into the corridor 29

ACCESS WITHIN CORRIDOR On-Street Parking Stillman Street to Ship Street (DTC corridor only) Existing Conditions DTC Service Plan WITHOUT Transit Priority Strategies DTC Service Plan with Transit Priority Strategies Parking spaces eliminated Parking spaces remaining 0 109 19 90 80 29 Transit Priority Strategies scenario includes full extent of transit-only lanes where possible 30

STRIKING A BALANCE Private Autos Traffic flow On-street parking Transit Priority Bus lanes Larger stations Pedestrian & Bicycle Sidewalk width Bicycle infrastructure DTC Design 31

4. BRANDING CONCEPTS 32

BRANDING APPROACHES 33

WHAT TO BRAND? Vehicles Unique vehicle design Distinctive look Stations & Stops Shelter and amenities Running Ways Bus lanes ITS & Fare Payment Transit signal priority Off-board fare collection Real-time passenger information Service Plan Wider stop spacing High-frequency service Simple and direct routing 34

BRANDING DO S Be clear and consistent Choose branding that resonates Communicate a shared vision Create a community Lead with brand as symbol of vision Get CEO/Board Buy-In Think longer term implications of expansion 35

BRANDING DON TS Don t overpromise Don t undermine brand with service decisions later Don t forget to coordinate brand strategies (rail, bus, BRT) but Don t overcomplicate Don t let crisis go unanswered 36

BRANDING FOOTPRINT ATTRIBUTES 37

5. NEXT STEPS 38

DESIGN PROCESS Sep 2016 Apr 2017 Sep 2017 May 2018 Jan 2019 Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Final Design Construction Operations 39

NEXT STEPS Outreach Hold second public meeting (mid-march) Additional targeted outreach Advancement of Conceptual Engineering Additional study into benefits and impacts of scenarios Select preferred design scenario Next Stakeholder Meeting Anticipated April / May 2017 40