Sound Transit Financing and 3-County Road & Transit Funding

Similar documents
Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

CENTRAL AND EAST CORRIDORS

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Exhibit #MH-156. ELECTRIC OPERATIONS (MH10-2) PROJECTED OPERATING STATEMENT (In Millions of Dollars) For the year ended March 31 REVENUES

Long-Range Financial Plan Implications of Revised Sales Tax Projections for DART

Northwest Corridor Project (I-75/I-575) Agenda. Brief Project History. Stakeholder Briefing January 27, Brief Project history

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Sound Transit Permit Parking Program

Sound Move. Appendix C:, J?enefits, system use and transportation impacts of Sound Move. Launching a Rapid Transit System for the Puget Sound Region

Bellevue Chamber of Commerce, Transportation & Public Affairs Committee meeting. July 12, 2016

Florida s Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING

WHAT IFS: Over the course of

MTA CAPITAL PROGRAM: Tri-State Transportation Campaign

Where We Live and Work Today

Transit Development Plan and 2009 Annual Report

Wellington Public Transport Spine Study

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Virginia Beach Transit Extension Study Draft Environmental Impact Statement Town Center Alignment Alternative Public Informational Meetings September

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

November 14, Dulles To DC Loop Public-Private Partnership Proposal. Executive Summary

Previous Transit Studies MTTF MEETING #

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Local Communities. Where We re Growing: Planning Together for a Sustainable Region

How Global Trade Is Driving Demand For Ports

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Highway User Fee Funding Of Local Roads in Illinois. NOT Equitable. NOT Sustainable. October 20, 2015

395 Express Lanes Extension

1.221J/11.527J/ESD.201J TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS FALL 2003 FINAL EXAMINATION. 1. Open-book and open-notes, calculators are fine -- no laptops.

DRAFT SYSTEM PLAN MAP KEY BRT STATION EXISTING FACILITY. Burien TC

SOUND TRANSIT AT A GLANCE

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

State Road & Tollway Authority Georgia 400 Demolition Project Frequently Asked Questions

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Transportation Infrastructure Systems Needs and Challenges: Progress Report

Public Hearing Tarrant County. October 11 th, 2012

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Program Update. Relationship: RP, RTIP, Budget, POF. Board of Directors Item 16 February 22, Board of Directors Item 16 Feb 22,

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

Transform 66 Project February 4, 2016 Partnering Conference Michigan Department of Transportation American Council of Engineering Companies

Sketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby

APPENDIX A LITERATURE REVIEW AND SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

Private-Public Partnership. Presentation to Metropolitan Council October 2, 2017

Transportation Day at the Capitol. Charlie Zelle Commissioner, MnDOT Feb. 16, 2017

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

RTC TRANSIT OPERATING STATISTICS RTC RIDE RTC RAPID RTC INTERCITY SIERRA SPIRIT

The third deficit: Illinois transportation crisis

Progress Report Capital Programs Support

Project Budget and Schedule Status

February 2018 METRO TRANSIT RIDERSHIP AUDIT PROGRAM EVALUATION AND AUDIT

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Application to Miami-Dade Transit

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

Going Green: How California is Reviving Passenger Rail. APTA/ AASHTO AASHTO 2008 State Public Transit Partnerships. August 7, 2008

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Two Capitals: 1 w/lrt, 1 w/out How Has Transit Fared in Each?

MOTION NO. M Contract Amendment for Systems Construction Management Consultant Services

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

VAN BUREN CHARTER TOWNSHIP DASHBOARD

South King County High Capacity Transit Corridor Report. Regional Transit Connections and Active Transportation

405 Express Lanes General Information & Frequently Asked Questions

TABLES AND CHARTS 2018 UPDATE

1/30/2019 DRAFT. January 31, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

The U.S. Economic Outlook

SOUNDCAST CALIBRATION AND SENSITIVITY TEST RESULTS (DRAFT) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Puget Sound Regional Council. Suzanne Childress.

Bus Riders of Saskatoon Meeting with City of Saskatoon Utility Services Department October 23, :30pm 2:30pm th Street West, Saskatoon

110 Edgar Martinez Drive South P.O. Box Seattle, WA (206) August 15, 2018

Federal Regulatory Update WTBA/WisDOT Contractor/Engineer Conference

Memorandum. To: City Council. cc: Tony Piasecki, City Manager Date: 3/3/2016. Introduction

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

CURRENT AND VOTER APPROVED SOUND TRANSIT SERVICE

MARTA Expansion Update

2019 ECONOMIC FORECAST AND FINANCIAL MARKET UPDATE

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

METRO. Monthly Board Report. February 2009

Fact Sheet for Q3 and January-September 2012 October 24, 2012

Transportation 2040 Update: Travel Trends. Transportation Policy Board June 9, 2016

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

SUBJECT: Board Approval: 4/29/04

6/14/2013. Welcome. to the US 75 Corridor Study. Public Meeting. US 75 Corridor Study Area

Board of Directors. March 8, March 8, Board. Item 9-2, 1

Proposed Project I 35 from Denton to Cooke County Line

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Canadian Teleconference: Can the Canadian Economy Survive the Turmoil in the United States?

2010 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Report

July 30, Ms. Eryn Kehe Metro NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR. Dear Ms. Kehe,

Shifting International Trade Routes A National Economic Outlook. February 1, 2011

Transportation Authority of Marin Renew Existing ½-cent Transportation Sales Tax

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

I-405/SR 167 Corridor Executive Advisory Group

The U.S. Economy How Serious A Downturn? Nigel Gault Group Managing Director North American Macroeconomic Services

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

Transcription:

Sound Transit Financing and 3-County Road & Transit Funding Presentation to the Eastside Transportation association November 19, 2014 By James W. MacIsaac, P.E

Sound Move LRT Starter Line 1996 LRT 21-mile Starter Line S. 200 th to NE 45 th St (U-District) Per 1999 EIS: Estimated Capital Cost -- $2.3 billion YOE Estimated Completion 2006 (10 years) Estimated 2020 Boardings 133,000 per Annual Average Day LRT Time and Cost Grossly Underestimated Initial Segment + Airport (Westlake Sta to Airport) 15.6 miles Estimated capital Cost -- $2.4 billion YOE Completed 2010 (14 years) 2011 Actual Boardings 23,600 per Annual Average Day 2012 Before and After Study Corridor Transit Linked Trips 2008 Before 68,500; 2011 After 75,700 New Transit Trips 7,200 (+10%) New Commuter Transit Trips 1,900 (Negligible Peak Period Impact) Completion of 21-mile Starter Line Estimated Capital Cost -- $5.3 billion YOE Estimated Completion 2020 (24 years)

ST2 (Phase 2) Program In 2008 a Phase 2 program and tax increase proposed to voters Before any portion of the 21-mile Starter Line was completed More Tax Revenue needed to complete Sound Move Election Year selected to maximize potential approval of the 0.5% Sales Tax increase No Sunset year proposed for all Approved ST taxes Phase2 would increase LRT System from 21 miles to 51 miles But still 32 miles short of the LRT Core System : Tacoma Dome to Everett Station and east to Redmond CBD Sound Move and ST2 Finance Plan Merged Final Outcome of Sound Move will never be known

Current Sound Transit ST1/ST2 Program 1997-2023 Estimates 2008 Est 2014 Est Change Comment SOURCES (YOE $millions) Includes 1997-2008 Total Tax Revenue 18,730 14,523 (4,206) Recession Total Fare Revenue 1,474 1,179 (295) Slow startups FTA Grants 3,108 3,288 179 Bond Proceeds less Issue Cost 9,036 8,494 (542) At 1.5 Coverage Other plus Interest 550 959 409 Early Bond Sales Total Sources 32,897 28,443 (4,454) USES (YOE $millions) Capital Program 21,095 17,416 (3,679) So. Corridor Cut Debt Service 4,271 3,228 (1,043) Bond Wrapping O&M Costs 6,485 5,881 (605) Slow Startups Cap and O&M Reserves 1,544 1,880 336 Total Uses 33,395 28,405 (4,991) Gen Fund Cash Balance (498) 38 536

ST1/ST2 Financial Plan YOE $millions 1997-2023 SOURCES Thru Const Total Tax Revenue 14,523 Total Fare Revenue 1,179 FTA Grants 3,288 Bond Proceeds less Issue Cost 8,494 Other plus Interest 959 Total Sources 28,443 1997-2040 Plan Period 38,583 3,910 4,667 8,494 1,328 56,982 1997-2053 Bond Period 74,680 6,850 5,960 8,494 1,592 97,577 USES Capital Program 17,416 Debt Service 3,228 O&M Costs 5,881 Cap and O&M Reserves 1,880 Total Uses 28,405 17,660 12,728 15,445 5,299 51,132 17,748 19,748 26,266 8,019 71,781 Gen Fund Cash Balance 38 5,850 25,796

Sound Transit Phases 1 and 2 Capital Programs Length Year Cap Cost (Miles) Segment Complete YOE $Mils Sound Move (0.4% ST + 0.3% MVET + $1.2 billion Bonds) 15.6 Initial Segment+Airport (Westlake to Airport) 2010 2,354 3.2 University Link (Westlake to UW station) 2016 1,756 1.6 Tacoma Link (Tacoma Dome to CBD) 2006 77 20.4 Subtotal LRT System 4,187 Sounder (Tacoma to Everett) 1,229 Regional Express (22 Routes and Access) 820 Sound Move Total Capital Program 6,236 ST2 (Phase 2) (+0.5% Sales Tax + $7.3 billion Bonds) 12.5 North Corridor (UW Station to Lynnwood) 2023 3,977 1.6 S. 200th St Ext (Airport to S. 200th Street)) 2016 383 ROW, PE, EIS (S.200th to Tacoma Dome) 2020 163 Central Link O&M Facility and Vehicles 1,439 14.3 East Link (Seattle to Overlake TC) 2023 3,805 East Link Maint Facility and Vehicles 2023 644 2.0 Tacoma Link Ext (CBD to Tac Gen Hosp) 2020 153 LRT Other 482 30.4 Subtotal LRT System 11,046 Sounder Stations, Parking, etc. 1,084 Express Bus 530 Service Delivery, Systemwide 540 ST2 Total Capital Program 13,200 50.8 Sound Move plus ST2 19,436

Annual Expense in YOE $millions $2,600 $2,400 $2,200 $2,000 $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 ST1&2 Revenue and Expense Estimates Source: Sound Transit 2014 Financial Plan NOTE: Capital spending in excess of Revenue is covered by Bond sales; 50% of the Capital Program is Bonded with 30-year bonds thru 2053. Total Revenue Excl Bond Proceeds ST1 + ST2 Capital Program $17.7 Billion (50% Bonded) Planned Completion of ST2 Capital Program Available for 3.5% ST2 Contingency and/or ST3 Program $998m MVET Ends $1,476m> $173m> $1,000 $800 Debt Service on $8.5 billion Bonds $564m > $600 $400 O&M Costs $528 > $200 $0 Capital and O&M Reserves $205m > 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Capital and O&M Reserves O&M Costs Debt Service Capital Program Revenue Excl Bonds

ST2 Bonding Issue The 2014 Fin Plan shows a need for $8.5 billion in Bond Sales to complete the ST1/ST2 program by 2023/4 Maximum Bonding previously controlled by Debt Service Coverage ratio RCW 81.104.210 limits bond sales for High capacity transportation corridor areas to 1.5% of the value of taxable property within the area McCartan reports that to currently be $5.5 billion limit That leaves a bonding shortfall of $3.0 billion A 60% approval is needed from the area voters to increase the bonding capacity up to 5% of taxable property in the area up to $18 billion? OR, apply the new ST3 tax increase from 2017 thru 2023 to the ST2 program financing needs Reduces ST2 bonding needs to $4.7 billion thru 2023 It only requires 50.1% favorable vote to pass a tax increase; versus 60% favorable vote to increase the bonding limit I m sure that ST does not want to do both in 2016

Sound Transit LRT Core System 1 Potential Phase 3 Length Year Cap Cost (Miles) Segment Complete YOE $Mils Sound Move (ST1) 20.4 Total LRT 2016 4,187 Sounder and Express Bus 2,049 Total Sound Move 6,236 ST2 (Phase 2) 30.4 LRT Extensions 2023 11,047 Sounder and Express Bus 2,153 Total ST2 13,200 Minimum ST3 to Finish Core System 2 North Corridor (Lynnwood to Everett) 2035 6,267 South Corridor (S. 200th to Tacoma Dome) 2035 6,039 East Corridor (Overlake TC to Red CBD) 2030 1,600 31.6 Total Minimum ST3 13,906 82.4 Total with Completion of LRT Core System 3 33,342 1 The LRT Core System is from Tacoma to Everett and east to the Redmond CBD. 2 May have subarea equity issues. 3 Original 1995 proposal for LRT Sysem Phase 1, to be completed by 2010.

ST2/ST3 Funding Needs Current Funding only finances the ST1/ST2 Program Only about $1 billion estimated excess revenue from 2023-30 Represents a 3.5% contingency for the ST1/ST2 program thru 2030 Or, represents a minimal start for an ST3 program Brian McCartan proposes an ST3 Tax Increase in 2016 Option 1: 0.55% Sales Tax increase (from 0.9% to 1.45%) Option 2: 1.3% MVET increase (current 0.3% expires after 2028) Option 3: Property Tax increase of $105 per 100k of property value Option 4 and 5: Lesser combinations of two or three above Vote in November 2016; revenue starts mid-2017 Option 1 creates $3.7 billion of new revenue from 2017 thru 2023 Will this be used to reduce ST2 bonding needs? The next slide shows additional tax revenue if Option 1 is approved by voters in November 2016

Annual Expense in YOE $millions $2,600 $2,400 $2,200 ST1/ST2/ST3 Revenue Excluding Bond Sales Source: Sound Transit 2014 Financial Plan + 0.55% Sales Tax Increase Planned Completion of ST2 Capital Program $2,224m > $2,000 $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 Current 2017-2034 = $3.7 Billion (Applied in lieu of ST2 Bonds?) $1,836m > $577m > $1,628 ST3 Tax Revenue $748m > $1,976 MVET Ends $1,000 $800 $600 $907 > $672 > ST1/ST2 Tax Revenue $1,051 > $1,228 > $400 $200 $58m > $177m > FTA Grants $125m > Fare Revenue Other + Interest $83m > $95m > $0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Other Incl Interest FTA Grants Fare Revenue ST1/ST2 Tax Revenue Proposed T3 Tax Revenue $153m >

Annual Expense in YOE $millions $2,600 $2,400 $2,200 ST1/ST2/Prop ST3 Revenue and Expense Estimates Source: Sound Transit 2014 Financial Plan Modified to Add ST's ST3 Tax Proposal Planned Completion of ST2 Capital Program $2,224m > $2,000 $1,800 $1,600 $1,400 $1,200 Total Revenue Excl Bond Proceeds ST3 Tax Increase Phases in 2017-18 ST1 + ST2 Capital Program $17.7 Billion (27% Bonded) $1,096m > Available for ST2 Contingency and ST3 Program $6,770m thru 2030 ($13.6 billion thru 2035) $1,000 $800 Debt Service on $4.7 billion Bonds $390m > $600 $400 O&M Costs $528 > $200 $0 Capital and O&M Reserves $205m > 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Capital and O&M Reserves O&M Costs Debt Service Capital Program Revenue Excl Bonds

Subarea Equity Capital costs for ST1 and ST2 Projects have already been assigned by Subarea; assume these are sunk commitments Subarea equity assumes that all benefit is assigned to the Suburban end of trips. This is transit planning from the 1940s Capital and O&M Costs should have been allocated by Station Boardings The trip Origin end benefits from transit trip subsidy The trip Destination end obtains economic benefit For Example: Sounder North: North King - 48%, Snohomish - 52% Sounder South: North King - 45%, South King - 30%, Pierce - 25% East King BRT: North King - 45%, East King - 50%, Snohomish - 5% East Link: North King - 51%, East King - 49% Need to Revise future O&M Cost allocations ST3 Subarea Equity allocations will be interesting The vast majority of remaining LRT Core System lies in the Snohomish, South King and Pierce subareas

Transportation Funding 3-County Region In 1991 transportation funding was 67% for Streets and Highways, and 33% for area transit (then four county/city agencies In 1996 Sound Transit was created with.04% sales tax increase and 0.3% MVET In 2000 the MVET was eliminated for all except Sound Transit Its 0.3% MVET continues thru 2028 From 2005 thru 2008 Road funding was increased by the Nickel and TPA tax increases; local transit sales tax was increased to 0.9% maximum By 2008 transportation funding had declined to 48% for Streets and Highways, and increased to 52% for area transit Sound Transit ST2 was approved in Nov 2008 with sales tax increased from 0.4% to the 0.9% maximum allowable Today (2014) transportation funding had declined to 45% for Streets and Highways, and increased to 55% for area transit By 2030 with the ST3 tax increase, transportation funding will decline to 31% for Streets and Highways, and increase to 69% for area transit

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Annual Revenue ($millions) $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 Annual Transportation Revenue Three-County Central Puget Sound Region Transit Revenues: Sales Tax, MVET*, State and Fed Grants, Farebox Propert & CRC Taxes and Other. Street & Highway revenues: Fed and State Fuel Taxes, MVET*, Weight Fees and Tolls, and 10% assumed for local road and street funding. *MVET phased out by 2001 except for Sound Transit. Recession Current 35% 36% $3,000 $2,000 26% + ST2 Tax 20% 29% Sales Tax Increases 32% 27% 33% $1,000 33% 67% $0 34% MVET TPA Tax Phased In Phased Out Nickel Tax 48% 66% Includes an assumed 10% from local contributuins 45% 37% Street & Highway Revenue With No Fuel Tax Indexing 31% Streets & Highways County/City Transit Sound Transit ST3 0.55% Sales Tax

Transportation Funding Conclusions The PSRC Transportation 2040 Estimates: 95% of all motorized people movement will be in private cars using roads 100% of all freight movement will be on the road system 100% of all bus transit operations will be on the road system Only 5% of daily people-movement will be on transit Only about 1% of transit riders will be on rail systems These are MacIsaac suggestions: Legislative action needed to significantly increase road funding Consider another Nickel increase for specific state highway projects In addition consider increasing the 23c/gallon fuel tax to 28c/gallon for general road use, split between state and county/cities as currently split Index all road user fees (taxes) by the Seattle CPI Legislative non-action to approve any further increases in transit tax limits Maintain current 0.9% sales tax limit for Sound Transit Do not allow MVET nor property tax increases for Sound Transit Maintain current 0.9% sales tax limit for each local transit agency Encourage transit agencies to increase fare shares of operating costs to 65%

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Annual Revenue ($millions) $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 Annual Transportation Revenue Alternative Three-County Central Puget Sound Region Transit Revenues: Sales Tax, MVET*, State and Fed Grants, Farebox Propert & CRC Taxes and Other. Street & Highway revenues: Fed and State Fuel Taxes, MVET*, Weight Fees and Tolls, and 10% assumed for local road and street funding. *MVET phased out by 2001 except for Sound Transit. Recession Current 27% 24% 33% $3,000 $2,000 26% + ST2 Tax 20% 29% Sales Tax Increases 32% 28% $1,000 33% 67% $0 34% MVET TPA Tax Phased In Phased Out Nickel Tax 48% 66% Includes an assumed 10% from local contributuins 45% 45% Street & Highway Revenue With No Fuel Tax Indexing 43% Streets & Highways 2016 Tax Increases County/City Transit Sound Transit

Take This Chart to our Legislators 10c/gallon State Fuel Tax increase plus indexing is about comparable in revenue to the ST3 Tax Increases being sought by Sound Transit If applied to road funding rather than to ST3, it would at least keep road funding from further proportional decline Even so, is spending 55% of our transportation dollars on transit funding to serve only 5% of mobility choice a justifiable use of transportation dollars for our 3-county region Should the need for more transit funding be accommodated by user fees (fares) up to 65% of O&M Costs?