Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Similar documents
Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Traffic Study North Shore School District 112

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

Troutbeck Farm Development

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, North Carolina

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Highway 111 Corridor Study

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Traffic Impact Statement

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

Traffic Study of Fuller Street, Cady Street, West Street and West Avenue. Final Report

Transportation Advisory Board

Capital Region Council of Governments

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Intersection LOS Intersection level of service (LOS) is defined by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by the following criteria:

Cheyenne Metropolitan Planning Organization

Meadowlake Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis (LSC #184600) August 27, 2018

Traffic Impact Study. Crestline Piggly Wiggly Mountain Brook, Alabama. Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood, Inc. Birmingham, Alabama.

INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Traffic Academy: IJS & IMS FAQ/RULES OF THUMB

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

MEMORANDUM. Nantasket Road at Kingsley Road Kingsley Road at Sumner Street Kingsley Road at Revere Street Kingsley Road at Kenberma Street

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998

Gateway Transportation Study

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

Brian McHugh, Buckhead Community Improvement District. SUBJECT: Wieuca Road at Phipps Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project

Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation

4.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

CarMax Auto Superstore/ Reconditioning Center #6002 Murrieta, California

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 1161 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum

STILLWATER AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY Old Town, Maine

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

Include autoturn exhibits of WB-67 trucks at each roundabout.

Draft Report. Traffic Impact Study. Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development. Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Prepared for

List of Exhibits...ii

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN: BLUFFTON PARKWAY BLUFFTON PARKWAY: PHASE FOUR TOWN OF BLUFFTON & BEAUFORT COUNTY, SC

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Grant Avenue Streetscape

Transcription:

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007

Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background Information... 3 Study Area Roadways... 3 Peak Hour Traffic Counts... 3 Daily Traffic Counts... 3 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis... 6 Existing Arterial Segment Capacity Analysis... 7 Existing Roadway Segment Analysis... 8 Right-Turn Lane Warrant Evaluations... 8 Intersection Accident Analysis... 10 North College Street at Glenn Avenue... 10 North Donahue Drive at West Glenn Avenue... 10 West Glenn Avenue at Wright Street... 11 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis... 11 Traffic Signal Systems Evaluation... 12 Recommended Improvements... 15 Glenn Avenue at Donahue Drive... 15 Glenn Avenue at Wright Street... 15 Glenn Avenue at College Street... 15 Glenn Avenue Improvements... 15 Intersection Capacity Analysis with Recommended Improvements... 21 Arterial Segment Capacity Analysis with Improvements... 22 Page Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Existing Traffic Count Data Existing Capacity Analysis Printouts Capacity Analysis Printouts with Recommended Improvements Skipper Consulting, Inc. i

Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Description Page 3-1 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study Intersections... 2 3-2 Existing AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Counts... 4 3-3 Existing PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Counts... 5 3-4 Traffic Signal Systems... 14 3-5 Glenn Avenue at Donahue Drive Improvements... 17 3-6 Glenn Avenue at College Street Improvements... 18 3-7 Glenn Avenue at Wright Street Improvements... 19 3-8 Glenn Avenue Improvements... 20 LIST OF TABULATIONS Table Description Page 3-1 Study Area Roadways Characteristics... 3 3-2 Existing Intersection Levels of Service... 6 3-3 Existing Arterial Segment Levels of Service... 7 3-4 Intersection Levels of Service with Improvements... 21 3-5 Arterial Segment Levels of Service with Improvements... 22 Skipper Consulting, Inc. ii

INTRODUCTION This section documents the results of traffic signal operations evaluations and traffic signal systems needs for the Glenn Avenue Corridor from Donahue Drive to College Street in Auburn, Alabama. The intersections studied in this corridor include: Glenn Avenue at Donahue Drive Glenn Avenue at Wright Street Glenn Avenue at College Street The locations of the study intersections along the Glenn Avenue Corridor are illustrated in Figure 3-1. In order to accomplish the traffic signal operations evaluations at these locations within the study corridor, the following tasks were undertaken: existing peak hour turning movement counts were conducted for the study intersections; capacity analyses were conducted for the study intersections; current traffic operational deficiencies were identified; geometric and traffic control improvements were developed for the study intersections to address operational and safety deficiencies; and traffic signal systems needs were identified to develop a coordinated signal system. Sources of information used in this section include: the City of Auburn, Alabama; the Institute of Transportation Engineers; American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials; the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices; the Transportation Research Board; and the files and field reconnaissance efforts of Skipper Consulting, Inc. Skipper Consulting, Inc. 1

BACKGROUND INFORMATION Study Area Roadways The Glenn Avenue Corridor from Donahue Drive to College Street runs in an east/west direction. The segment of Glenn Avenue evaluated is approximately 0.5 miles in length. Characteristics for each study roadway evaluated in the Glenn Avenue Corridor are provided in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 Study Corridor Roadways Characteristics # of Lanes Travel Speeds (mph) Roadway Parking Travel Classification Direction Glenn Avenue None 2 East/West 25 Arterial Donahue Drive None 3 North/South 25 Arterial Wright Street Parallel 1 North 25 Collector College Street None 4 North/South 35 Arterial Peak Hour Traffic Counts Morning (7:00-9:00 am) and afternoon (4:00-6:00 pm) peak hour turning movement counts were conducted at the Glenn Avenue Corridor intersections during the months of September and October 2005. Wright Street counts were conducted in September of 2007. Traffic count data utilized for the analyses of these intersections is illustrated in Figure 3-2 and Figure 3-3. Complete traffic count data is provided in Appendix A for reference. Daily Traffic Counts Daily traffic counts for Glenn Avenue were conducted by the City of Auburn on April 11, 2007. These counts indicate that the current daily volume on Glenn Avenue is 14,208 vehicles per day. Daily traffic count data for Glenn Avenue is provided in Appendix A. Skipper Consulting, Inc. 3

EXISTING INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Capacity analyses for peak hour conditions at the study intersections along the Glenn Avenue Corridor were conducted for morning and afternoon peak hour periods using methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, Third Edition. According to methods of the Highway Capacity Manual, capacity is expressed as levels of service ranging from A (best) through F (worst). In general, a level of service C is considered desirable while a level of service D is considered acceptable during peak hour operations. Results of these capacity analyses for existing conditions are summarized in Table 3-2. Existing intersection capacity printouts, which present details of the capacity analyses, are provided in Appendix B for reference. Intersection (traffic control) Glenn Avenue at Donahue Drive (traffic signal) Table 3-2 Existing Intersection Levels of Service Approach Movement/Lane Group A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service P.M. Peak Hour EB Glenn Avenue Left C C Through/Right C C WB Glenn Avenue Left D D Through/Right C D NB Donahue Drive Left B B Through/Right C D SB Donahue Drive Left B B Through/Right C C Overall LOS C C Glenn Avenue at NB Wright Street Left D F Wright Street Right B D (side street stop) Overall LOS C F Glenn Avenue at College Street (traffic signal) EB Glenn Avenue Left C B Through/Right C C WB Glenn Avenue Left C C Through/Right D C Left B C NB College Street Through C E Right C D Left B C SB College Street Through C D Right C D Overall LOS C D Skipper Consulting, Inc. 6

As shown in Table 3-2, the study intersections evaluated along the Glenn Avenue Corridor operate with acceptable levels of service for both peak periods evaluated. The only movements which operate with less than a level of service D is the northbound through movement on College Street and the northbound left turn movement on Wright Street during the afternoon peak hour. EXISTING ARTERIAL SEGMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS Arterial segment capacity analyses for peak hour conditions along the Glenn Avenue Corridor were conducted for the morning and afternoon peak hour periods using methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, Third Edition. Levels of service for the arterial analyses conducted for Glenn Avenue are summarized in Table 3-3. Capacity printouts are provided in Appendix B. Table 3-3 Existing Arterial Segment Levels of Service Eastbound Glenn Avenue Arterial Analysis Arterial Level of Segment Service by Section From To Length AM Peak PM Peak Donahue Drive College Street 0.50 B B Total Urban Street LOS B B Westbound Glenn Avenue Arterial Analysis Arterial Level of Segment Service by Section From To Length AM Peak PM Peak College Street Donahue Drive 0.50 B B Total Urban Street LOS B B Table 3-3 indicates that the total urban street level of service along Glenn Avenue from Donahue Drive to College Street would be a level of service B for each direction of travel during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Skipper Consulting, Inc. 7

EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS A comparison of current daily traffic volumes and daily carrying capacities was conducted for Glenn Avenue. This comparison was conducted utilizing the Alabama Department of Transportation s Approved Capacities and Level of Service Criteria. Based on these criteria, the daily carrying capacity for a two-lane arterial roadway is 13,300 vehicles per day. The current daily traffic volume on Glenn Avenue is 14,208 vehicles, as counted by the City of Auburn on April 11, 2007. Based upon this comparison, the current daily traffic volume on Glenn Avenue exceeds the carrying capacity based upon the ALDOT criteria. RIGHT-TURN LANE WARRANT EVALUATIONS An assessment of the need for right turn lanes along Glenn Avenue and the intersecting roadways was conducted. This assessment was conducted for each approach at of Glenn Avenue and the intersecting roadways for each of the study intersections. The criteria utilized was based upon information contained in the Intersection Channelization Design Guide, Report 279, published by the Transportation Research Board. Existing peak hour traffic volumes were compared with right-turn lane warrant criteria as presented in the Intersection Channelization Design Guide, Report 279. The results of these comparisons indicate current volumes are sufficient to meet the criteria for right-turn lanes as described above. Westbound Glenn Avenue at Donahue Drive During both the morning and afternoon peak hours, traffic volumes are sufficient to meet the criteria for full length right turn lanes with tapers. Northbound Donahue Drive at Glenn Avenue During the morning peak hour, traffic volumes are sufficient to meet the criteria for a deceleration taper. Skipper Consulting, Inc. 8

However, during the afternoon peak hour, traffic volumes are sufficient to meet and exceed the criteria for a full length right turn lane with taper. Eastbound Glenn Avenue at College Street During both the morning and afternoon peak hours, traffic volumes would meet and exceed the criteria for a full right turn lane with taper. Right turn lane guidelines, as presented in the Intersection Channelization Design Guide, Report 279, are provided for reference in the following charts. RIGHT TURN LANE WARRANT RIGHT TURNS IN PEAK HOUR (VPH) 100 80 60 40 TAPER RADIUS ONLY REQUIRED 2 - LANE HIGHWAYS FULL- WIDTH TURN LANE 20 NOTE: FOR POSTED SPEEDS AT OR UNDER 45 MPH, PEAK HOUR RIGHT TURNS GREATER THAN 40 VPH, AND TOTAL PEAK HOUR APPROACH LESS THAN 300VPH, ADJUST RIGHT TURN VOLUMES. ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR RIGHT TURNS= PEAK HOUR RIGHT TURNS - 20 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 TOTAL PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME (VPH) Skipper Consulting, Inc. 9

120 RIGHT TURN LANE WARRANT RIGHT TURNS IN PEAK HOUR (VPH) 100 80 60 TAPER FULL WIDTH TURN LANE 4 - LANE HIGHWAYS 40 20 RADIUS NOTE: FOR APPLICATION ON HIGH SPEED HIGHWAYS 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 TOTAL PEAK HOUR APPROACH VOLUME (VPH) * Taken from Figure 4-23, Intersection Channelization Design Guide, Report 279, published by the Transportation Research Board. INTERSECTION ACCIDENT ANALYSIS North College Street at Glenn Avenue According to the initial crash screening of this intersection, it has approximately 1.31 crashes per million vehicles entering the intersection for 2003-2004. The City of Auburn provided crash data at this intersection for the purposes of crash pattern analysis. After a review of the latest crash data provided, no sustainable pattern in crashes was observed to indicate contributing conditions to a crash from the intersection. Based on a physical review of the intersection as well as the crash information, it is recommended that no corrective measures would be required at this time to mitigate any crashes for North College Street at Glenn Avenue intersection. North Donahue Drive at West Glenn Avenue According to the initial crash screening of this intersection, it has approximately 2.43 crashes per million vehicles entering the intersection for 2003-2004. The City of Auburn provided crash data at this intersection for the purposes of crash pattern analysis. After a review of the latest crash data provided, no sustainable pattern in crashes was observed to Skipper Consulting, Inc. 10

indicate contributing conditions to a crash from the intersection. Based on a physical review of the intersection as well as the crash information, it is recommended that no corrective measures would be required at this time to mitigate any crashes for North Donahue Drive at the West Glenn Avenue intersection. It is recommended, however, that the performance of this intersection be monitored considering it experienced approximately 2.43 crashes per million vehicles entering for the 2003-2004 period. West Glenn Avenue at Wright Street According to the initial crash screening of this intersection, it has approximately 0.65 crashes per million vehicles entering the intersection for 2003-2004. The City of Auburn provided crash data at this intersection for the purposes of crash pattern analysis. After a review of the latest crash data provided, no sustainable pattern in crashes was observed to indicate contributing conditions to a crash from the intersection. Crash data was provided by the City of Auburn for the Wright Street at Glenn Avenue intersection for the most recent 12 month period (2006). A review of the crash data was conducted to determine if any crash patterns were being experienced which would possibly be preventable with the installation of a traffic signal. Upon review of the crash data, approximately 10 crashes were reported to have occurred during 2006 at the study intersection. Further evaluation of the crash data indicates that 5 of these crashes actually occurred at either private driveways or in the vicinity of the study intersection, but were not actually intersection related. Similar results were found during 2004 and 2005. Of the 5 accidents that actually occurred at the study intersection during 2006, 2 were angle crashes which would possibly be preventable with the installation of a traffic signal. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Wright Street at Glenn Avenue As a result or current levels of service for the left turn exiting Wright Street during the afternoon peak hour, a signal warrant analysis was conducted to evaluate the need for a traffic signal at this intersection. The traffic signal warrant criteria utilized is presented in Skipper Consulting, Inc. 11

the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2000 Edition, as published by the Federal Highway Administration. To warrant traffic signalization, an intersection must satisfy one or more of the eight warrants presented in the MUTCD. Complete descriptions of the applicable warrants can be found in the MUTCD. Based on the volumes collected during the peak hours a traffic signal warrant was conducted. Based upon the comparison of existing traffic volumes with the peak hour warrant criteria, sufficient volumes are present to meet the criteria for signal warranting at this location. However, the majority of the approach volumes for Wright Street is in the right turn movement. With right turn reductions applied at this location, traffic signalization would not be warranted. A review of crash data for this intersection was also evaluated for signal warranting purposes. The results of this evaluation, presented in a previous section of this document, indicate that two (2) crashes susceptible to prevention with the installation of a traffic signal occurred at this intersection which does not meet the criteria of the MUTCD of five (5) crashes susceptible for prevention. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS EVALUATION Skipper Consulting, Inc. performed an evaluation of traffic signal spacing and traffic flow characteristics on Glenn Avenue. While there are no recommendations for traffic signal coordination between the two study intersections, it should be noted that a coordinated traffic signal system exists on Glenn Avenue from College Street to Gay Street. This system includes two signalized intersections, which are currently supervised by the onstreet master controller currently located at the water tank at the corner of Donahue Drive and Glenn Avenue using spread spectrum radios. The traffic signal system on Glenn Avenue as listed in the previous paragraph of this report should be included in the overall traffic signal system plan for the City of Auburn. Recommendations are made concerning traffic signal systems in other sections of this Skipper Consulting, Inc. 12

report; however due to the overlapping nature of the corridors the signal systems are interdependent. The relationship of the Glenn Avenue signal system with other signal systems recommended in this report is shown in Figure 3-4. As shown in this figure, the Glenn Avenue traffic signal system is cross-linked with the College Street signal system (existing) and the Gay Street signal system (proposed). The proposed Wright Street traffic signal should be incorporated into the Glenn Avenue signal system due to the close proximity with the intersection of Glenn Avenue and College Street. Skipper Consulting, Inc. 13

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Based upon the analyses and evaluations conducted for the Glenn Avenue Corridor, recommended roadway and traffic control improvements were developed in an effort to improve traffic flows through the corridor at study intersections and to address any capacity or safety deficiencies for the study intersections. The following outlines the recommended improvements for the Glenn Avenue Corridor from Donahue Drive to College Street. Glenn Avenue at Donahue Drive Signal timing and phasing modifications to include implementation of westbound protected/permissive left turn phasing. Construct a right turn lane for the westbound approach of Glenn Avenue. Construct a right turn lane for the northbound approach of Donahue Drive. Glenn Avenue at Wright Street Installation of a traffic signal to include pedestrian features. Traffic signalization at this location shall be coordinated with the Glenn Avenue Signal System. As previously mentioned, peak hour volumes at Wrights Street and Glenn Avenue would be sufficient to meet the peak hour signal warrant criteria of the MUTCD. Glenn Avenue at College Street Construct a right turn lane for the eastbound approach of Glenn Avenue. Convert the existing northbound right turn lane on College Street to a northbound through lane. Construct a northbound right turn lane on College Street. Glenn Avenue Improvements In addition to the intersection improvements recommended along this portion of Glenn Avenue, roadway and pedestrian crossing improvements are also recommended. The roadway improvements consist of widening Glenn Avenue to a three-lane cross section Skipper Consulting, Inc. 15

which would consist of a continuous center left turn lane. The roadway widening is recommended as a result of the current traffic volumes on Glenn Avenue as well as the number of access points along Glenn Avenue. It may be possible to restripe portions of Glenn Avenue to provide the three lane cross section. However, should the current roadway width not provide sufficient lane widths, widening could be accomplished with minimal widening efforts either symmetrically or on one side of Glenn Avenue. The pedestrian improvements are recommended as a result of the pedestrian activity observed crossing Glenn Avenue. The recommended improvements for the Glenn Avenue Corridor study intersections are illustrated in as follows: Figure 3-5 Figure 3-6 Figure 3-7 Figure 3-8 Glenn Avenue at Donahue Drive Improvements Glenn Avenue at College Street Improvements Glenn Avenue at Wright Street Improvements Glenn Avenue Improvements Skipper Consulting, Inc. 16

INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS WITH RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Capacity analyses were conducted for the study intersections along Glenn Avenue with the recommended improvements assumed to be in place. Capacity analyses were conducted using methods of the Highway Capacity Manual, as previously introduced. Table 3-4 provides a summary of the levels of service for study intersections assuming the recommended improvements would be implemented. For comparative purposes, existing levels of service are shown in red in Table 3-4. Capacity printouts are provided in Appendix C. Intersection (traffic control) Glenn Avenue at Donahue Drive (traffic signal) Table 3-4 Intersection Levels of Service with Improvements (Existing LOS indicated in RED) Approach Movement/Lane Group A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service P.M. Peak Hour EB Glenn Avenue Left C C C C Through/Right C C C C Left C D D D WB Glenn Avenue Through C C C Right A A D Left B B B B NB Donahue Drive Through C C C Right B B D SB Donahue Drive Left B B B B Through/Right C C C C Overall LOS C C C C Glenn Avenue at EB Glenn Avenue Through A -- B -- Wright Street WB Glenn Avenue Through A -- A -- (traffic signal) Left B D C F (LOS in red NB Wright Street for existing side Right B B D D street stop condition) Overall LOS C C B F Glenn Avenue at College Street (traffic signal) Left C C B B EB Glenn Avenue Through C C C Right B B C WB Glenn Avenue Left C C C C Through/Right D D C C Left B B C C NB College Street Through C C D E Right C C D D Left B B C C SB College Street Through C C D D Right C C D D Overall LOS C C C D Skipper Consulting, Inc. 21

Table 3-4 indicates that acceptable levels of service would be realized at each of the study intersections (Donahue Drive, Wright Street and College Street) along the Glenn Avenue Corridor with the implementation of the recommended improvements. With the implementation of the recommended improvements, delay reduction is expected for overall traffic flows at the study intersections as well as Glenn Avenue. ARTERIAL SEGMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS WITH IMPROVEMENTS Arterial segment capacity analyses for peak hour conditions along the Glenn Avenue Corridor were conducted for the morning and afternoon peak hours using methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, Third Edition. Levels of service for the arterial analyses conducted for Glenn Avenue are summarized in Table 3-5. For comparative purposes, existing levels of service are shown in red in Table 3-5. Capacity printouts are provided in Appendix C. Table 3-5 Arterial Segment Levels of Service with Improvements (Existing LOS indicated in RED) Eastbound Glenn Avenue Arterial Analysis Arterial Level of Segment Service by Section From To Length AM Peak PM Peak Donahue Drive Wright Street 0.42 A n/a B n/a Wright Street College Street 0.08 C n/a C n/a Total Urban Street LOS C B C B Westbound Glenn Avenue Arterial Analysis Arterial Level of Segment Service by Section From To Length AM Peak PM Peak College Street Wright Street 0.42 A n/a A n/a Wright Street Donahue Drive 0.08 C n/a C n/a Total Urban Street LOS B B C B Table 3-5 indicates that the total urban street level of service along Glenn Avenue from Donahue Drive to College Street would operate at levels of service C or better for each direction of travel during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. This analysis was Skipper Consulting, Inc. 22

conducted assuming the roadway and traffic control improvements outlined in this report would be in place. It should be noted that the overall arterial levels of service would generally be levels of service C with recommended improvements as compared to existing levels of service B. This is a result of installing a new signal at the Wright Street intersection with Glenn Avenue. With the installation of a new traffic signal, it is typical for the arterial level of service to deteriorate to some extent with delay for the main street through movements being realized with stop time for the main street associated with the newly installed traffic signal. However, Glenn Avenue would maintain an overall acceptable level of service with the installation of a signal at Wright Street. In order to minimize any potential impacts of a new signal along Glenn Avenue, side street green time should be held to a minimum and signal coordination with the traffic signal at College Street would be required for the Wright Street and Glenn Avenue intersection. Skipper Consulting, Inc. 23