Abstract The aim of this work is twosided. Firstly, experimental results obtained for numerous sets of airfoil measurements (mainly intended for wind


 Joan Whitehead
 10 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Wind Turbine Airfoil Catalogue Risfi R 8(EN) Franck Bertagnolio, Niels Sfirensen, Jeppe Johansen and Peter Fuglsang Risfi National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark August
2 Abstract The aim of this work is twosided. Firstly, experimental results obtained for numerous sets of airfoil measurements (mainly intended for wind turbine applications) are collected and compared with computational results from the D NavierStokes solver, as well as results from the panel method code. Secondly, weareinterested in validating the code and finding out for which airfoils it does not perform well compared to the experiments, as well as why, when it does so. The airfoils are classified according to the agreement between the numerical results and experimental data. A study correlating the available data and this classification is performed. It is found that transition modelling is to a large extent responsible for the poor quality of the computational results for most of the considered airfoils. The transition model mechanism that leads to these discrepancies is identified. Some advices are given for elaborating future airfoil design processes that would involve the numerical code in particular, and transition modelling in general. ISBN ISBN 87 9 (Internet) ISSN 8 Print: Pitney Bowes Management Services Danmark A/S
3 Contents Introduction NACA Wing Sections. Method. Results NACA  9 NACA 8 NACA  7 NACA  NACA 8 NACA  9 NACA  NACA  7 NACA  NACA  NACA  and NACA  Airfoils (VELUX Measurements) 9. Method 9. Results 9 NACA (V) NACA (V) NACA  Airfoil (VELUX Measurements) 8. Method 8. Results 8 RISχA Family Airfoils. Method. Results RISχA8 RISχA 8 RISχA 7 FFAW Airfoil 7. Method 7. Results 7 FFAW, Fixed Transition 77 FFAW, Free Transition 8 7 FFAW and FFAW Airfoils 8 7. Method 8 7. Results 8 FFAW 8 FFAW 9 Risfi R 8(EN)
4 8 S89 and S8 Airfoils 9 8. Method 9 8. Results 9 S89 9 S FXS9V Airfoil 9. Method 9. Results DU 9W and DU 9W Airfoils 8. Method 8. Results 8 DU 9W 9 DU 9W AAirfoil 7. Method 7. Results 7 Analysis of the Collected Results. Quantitative criteria. Classifying the airfoils. Interpretation of the selected airfoils data. Study of the transition and stall behaviors. Conclusions regarding the numerical code performances and airfoil design Conclusion 9 APPENDICES A LS() and LS()7 Airfoils References Risfi R 8(EN)
5 Introduction The aim of this report is to provide a catalogue of results for a wide range of wind turbine airfoils. These results are obtained from numerical simulations with the D incompressible NavierStokes solver (see [8, 9, ] for a detailed description of the numerical code). They are compared with experimental data, when these are available. The results are also compared with the code, which is based on a panel method combined with a viscous boundary layer formulation [9]. This work has several objectives. Firstly, it will permit to qualitatively evaluate the computational code and its performances. Secondly, by comparing the results obtained for the wide range of airfoils, on one hand it will be possible to give a better idea of the difficulties that can be faced when simulating certain types of airfoil, and on the other hand to identify the airfoil types that can be correctly simulated by the numerical model. Finally, it will provide a database of airfoil characteristics, that can be used in wind turbine design. In each of the sections where experimental and computational results are reported, there is a short introductory text describing the experimental facilities, as well as some relevant informations about the computations. Several airfoils can be included in the same section if they were experimentally measured during the same campaign. Measurements for some of the NACA wing sections were obtained in the VELUX wind tunnel [], whereas others were collected from the book by Abbott and von Doenhoff []. In the present report, the former ones are distinguished from the latter by adding (V) at the end of their respective airfoil names whenever necessary (e.g. NACA  was obtained from [], and NACA (V) was measured in the VELUX wind tunnel). The meshes that were used for computations are not drawn for every single airfoil. However, the one used for the NACA  in section is depicted. The general aspect of all the meshes used herein is very similar, the only difference in the mesh generation being the airfoil shape. All meshes were generated with the grid generator HypGridD []. The code is used in its standard version with panels distributed on the airfoil surface. The viscous boundary layer and wake options are activated. The Reynolds number is set to the same value as in the NavierStokes computations. An OrrSommerfeld transition criterion is used to simulate free transition. However, for cases where the experiment has been performed with a device triggering transition, fixed transition is enforced at the same chordwise location. The report is organized as follows. In sections to, the experimental and computational data are reported for the numerous airfoils. In section, the results are analysed by classifying the airfoils according to agreements or discrepancies between experiments and computations. Then, conclusions are drawn regarding the performances of the numerical code. The main conclusions of this work are reported in the last section. Additional airfoils will progressively be included in the appendices in future releases of this report. Risfi R 8(EN)
6 NACA Wing Sections This section is dedicated to the computation of several airfoils of the NACA wing section family. The computational data obtained with will be compared to the measurements performed at NASA in a lowturbulence pressure tunnel []. These measurements are reported in the book by Abbott and von Doenhoff []. Three subfamilies of NACA wing sections are investigated: NACA, NACA and NACA. They differ from each other by the chordwise position of minimum pressure. Then, a third digit indicates the design lift coefficient. The airfoils can finally be distinguished by their thickness, which is given by the last digits. Among the numerous possibilities in the different families, only the following airfoils are considered: NACA , NACA 8, NACA  NACA , NACA 8, NACA  NACA , NACA  NACA , NACA  It must be noted that most of these airfoils are used on wind turbines. For all the cases that are presented in this section, the Reynolds number of the experiment (and the computations) was Re =:.. Method Cmeshes were used for all the computations with 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. Further refinements of the grid didn't significantly improve the results. The mesh used for the NACA  airfoil, and details of regions of interest, are displayed on Figures . As it can be seen, the mesh lines were extended in the wake of the trailing edge in order to stabilize the computations. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for convective terms. The k! SST turbulence model by Menter was used for the turbulent viscosity []. The transition model by Michel [7] was used for simulating the free transition, together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations.. Results Results are presented as lift, drag and pitching moment coefficients as function of angle of attack, and also pressure and skin friction distributions at various angles are shown. There was an overall good agreement between the experimental data and the computational results. However, for some of the airfoils, there exists a shift in the angle of attack between experiments and computations in the linear region, where simulations were expected to perform well. This shift can be observed on the lift curve for the following airfoils: NACA , NACA , NACA 8, NACA , NACA , on Figures 8, respectively. Moreover, similar results were found using the panel method. In order to assess that the numerical code was not responsible for these discrepancies, an experimentthat was performed with the same airfoil as NACA  in another wind tunnel was considered in section. Risfi R 8(EN)
7 Figure. Mesh around the NACA  airfoil  Full view Figure. Mesh around the NACA  airfoil  Closer view of the airfoil Risfi R 8(EN) 7
8 Figure. Mesh around the NACA  airfoil  Closer view of the leading edge Figure. Mesh around the NACA  airfoil  Closer view of the trailing edge 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
9 NACA ... y/chord Figure.NACA  Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
10 Drag Coefficient Figure 7. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA , [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure 8. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
11 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure 9. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
12 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
13 NACA y/chord Figure.NACA 8 Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA 8, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
14 Drag Coefficient Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA 8, [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA 8, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
15 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA 8) Risfi R 8(EN)
16 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA 8) Risfi R 8(EN)
17 NACA ... y/chord Figure 7.NACA  Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 8. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
18 Drag Coefficient Figure 9. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA , [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
19 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
20 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
21 NACA ... y/chord Figure.NACA  Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
22 Drag Coefficient Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA , [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
23 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure 7. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
24 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure 8. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
25 NACA y/chord Figure 9.NACA 8 Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA 8, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
26 Drag Coefficient Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA 8, [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA 8, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
27 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA 8) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
28 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA 8) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
29 NACA ... y/chord Figure.NACA  Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
30 Drag Coefficient Figure 7. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA , [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure 8. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
31 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure 9. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
32 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
33 NACA ... y/chord Figure.NACA  Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
34 Drag Coefficient Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA , [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
35 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
36 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
37 NACA ... y/chord Figure 7.NACA  Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 8. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
38 Drag Coefficient Figure 9. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA , [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
39 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
40 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
41 NACA ... y/chord Figure.NACA  Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
42 Drag Coefficient Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA , [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
43 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure 7. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
44 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure 8. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN)
45 NACA ... y/chord Figure 9.NACA  Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
46 Drag Coefficient Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA , [])..9.8 Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA , []) Risfi R 8(EN)
47 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
48 (a) ff = o (b) ff = o (c) ff = o (d) ff = o (e) ff = o (f) ff =8 o Figure. Distributions (NACA ) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
49 NACA  and NACA  Airfoils (VELUX Measurements) These airfoils belong to the NACA wing section family. They were measured in the VELUX wind tunnel [], which has an open test section. The testing facility is described in detail by Fuglsang et al []. The Reynolds number of the experiment (and for the computations) was equal to : for the NACA  airfoil, and : for the NACA . Note that these are the freestream Reynolds numbers that have been measured in the wind tunnel.. Method The Cmeshes used for the computations had 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for the convective terms. The k! SST turbulence model by Menter was used for the turbulent viscosity[]. As the turbulence level was relatively high in the wind tunnel, it was expected that a fully turbulent computation might give better results. Therefore, both fully turbulent simulations and computations with the Michel transition model [7], together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency, were conducted. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations. It must be noted that for the first airfoil, due to large oscillations of the results for high angles of attack in steady state computations with transition model, the simulations for these large angles were performed in an unsteady mode in order to enhance the numerical stability of the method (with a nondimensional time step equal to ). The influence can clearly be seen on the pressure coefficient on Figs.9(def) and the skin friction coefficient (Figs.7(def)). The same problem was encountered for the second airfoil only for the highest angle of attack (ff = : o )forwhich pressure and skin friction coefficients are not presented.. Results As for the NACA  airfoil, the computational results and experimental data were in good agreement, except for after stall. As it can be seen on Figs. 78, the simulations were quite insensitive to the transition modelling in the linear region. It must be noted that the experiment and simulations were in good agreement in this region, when it was not the case with the very same airfoil measured in another wind tunnel (see section ). As for the NACA  airfoil, experiment and simulations were in rather good agreement in the linear region, but computations predicted a higher maximum lift. Risfi R 8(EN) 9
50 NACA (V)... y/chord Figure.NACA  Airfoil..  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN)
51 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Drag Coefficient... Figure 7. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), [])..8  Fully turbulent  Transition model.. Moment Coefficient Figure 8. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN)
52  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:7 o (b) ff =:8 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =:78 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =7:7 o (f) ff =9:9 o Figure 9. Distributions (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN)
53 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:7 o (b) ff =:8 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =:78 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =7:7 o (f) ff =9:9 o Figure 7. Distributions (NACA (V)) Risfi R 8(EN)
54 NACA (V)... y/chord Figure 7.NACA  Airfoil.8.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.. Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 7. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN)
55 ..  Fully turbulent  Transition model.. Drag Coefficient..... Figure 7. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), [])..  Fully turbulent  Transition model.8. Moment Coefficient Figure 7. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN)
56  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:9 o (b) ff =8: o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =:9 o (f) ff =7:9 o Figure 7. Distributions (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN)
57 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:9 o (b) ff =8: o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =:9 o (f) ff =7:9 o Figure 7. Distributions (NACA (V)) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
58 NACA  Airfoil (VELUX Measurements) This airfoil belongs to the NACA wing section family. It has been measured in the VELUX wind tunnel [], which has an open test section. The testing facility is described in detail by Fuglsang et al []. The Reynolds number of the experiment (and for the computations) wasequalto:.. Method The Cmesh used for the computation had 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for the convective terms. The k! SST turbulence model by Menter was used for the turbulent viscosity[]. As the turbulence level was relatively high in the wind tunnel, it was expected that a fully turbulent computation might give better results. Therefore, both fully turbulent simulations and computations with the Michel transition model [7], together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency, were conducted. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations.. Results Neither the fully turbulent computations, nor the simulations with transition model, were able to correctly estimate the experimental data. Moreover, the discrepancies are quite large. 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
59 NACA (V)... y/chord Figure 77.NACA  Airfoil..  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 78. Lift Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
60 ..  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Drag Coefficient Figure 79. Drag Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), [])...  Fully turbulent  Transition model.9 Moment Coefficient Figure 8. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN)
61  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:8 o (b) ff =8:8 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =:9 o (f) ff =:7 o Figure 8. Distributions (NACA (V), []) Risfi R 8(EN)
62 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:8 o (b) ff =8:8 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =:9 o (f) ff =:7 o Figure 8. Distributions (NACA (V)) Risfi R 8(EN)
63 RISχA Family Airfoils In this section, three airfoils of the RISχA family were tested. These airfoils were developed and optimized at Risfi National Laboratory for use on wind turbines []. The airfoils were tested in the VELUX wind tunnel, which has an open test section with a background turbulence level of %. It is described in detail by Fuglsang et al []. All tests were carried out at the highest possible Reynolds number Re =: (see [] for more details about the measurements). The following three airfoils were studied: RISχA8 RISχA RISχA. Method Although these airfoils have a blunt trailing edge, Cmeshes were used for all the computations. Therefore, the airfoils were slightly sharpened at the trailing edge. The meshes had 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The SUDSscheme was used for the convective terms in all computations. Turbulence was simulated by the k! SST model by Menter []. Both fully turbulent computations and computations with the transition model by Michel [7], together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency, were performed. The reason for this was that the fully turbulent computations were expected to give rather good results as the background turbulence level in the wind tunnel was relatively high. This might trigger an early transition to turbulence in the airfoil boundary layer. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations.. Results The computational results showed relative good agreement with the experiments for the three airfoils. In the linear region, the simulations with transition model were closer to the experimental data, whereas the fully turbulent computations were closer in the stalled region. Simulations with transition model predicted stall at a higher angle of attack than the experiment and overestimated the maximum lift. Risfi R 8(EN)
64 RISχA8... y/chord Figure 8. RISχA8 Airfoil.8.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.. Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 8. Lift Coefficient Curve (RISχA8, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
65 Fully turbulent  Transition model. Drag Coefficient Figure 8. Drag Coefficient Curve (RISχA8, [])..  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Moment Coefficient Figure 8. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (RISχA8, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
66  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:7 o (b) ff =7:9 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =:7 o (d) ff =:7 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =: o (f) ff =8:9 o Figure 87. Distributions (RISχA8, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
67 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:7 o (b) ff =7:9 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =:7 o (d) ff =:7 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =: o (f) ff =8:9 o Figure 88. Distributions (RISχA8) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
68 RISχA... y/chord Figure 89. RISχA Airfoil.8.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.. Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 9. Lift Coefficient Curve (RISχA, []) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
69 Fully turbulent  Transition model. Drag Coefficient Figure 9. Drag Coefficient Curve (RISχA, [])..  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Moment Coefficient Figure 9. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (RISχA, []) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
70  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =: o (b) ff =8:9 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =: o (f) ff =7:88 o Figure 9. Distributions (RISχA, []) 7 Risfi R 8(EN)
71 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =: o (b) ff =8:9 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =: o (f) ff =7:88 o Figure 9. Distributions (RISχA) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
72 RISχA... y/chord Figure 9. RISχA Airfoil.8.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.. Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 9. Lift Coefficient Curve (RISχA, []) 7 Risfi R 8(EN)
73 Fully turbulent  Transition model. Drag Coefficient Figure 97. Drag Coefficient Curve (RISχA, [])..  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Moment Coefficient Figure 98. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (RISχA, []) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
74  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:97 o (b) ff =8:8 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =:7 o (d) ff =: o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =:9 o (f) ff =9: o Figure 99. Distributions (RISχA, []) 7 Risfi R 8(EN)
75 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =:97 o (b) ff =8:8 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =:7 o (d) ff =: o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =:9 o (f) ff =9: o Figure. Distributions (RISχA) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
76 FFAW Airfoil The FFAW airfoil manufactured and equipped at FFA (The Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden) was investigated. It is a % thickness airfoil. It was tested in the low speed wind tunnel L (located at KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm) with a turbulence intensity of.% [, 7]. The Reynolds number of the experiment was Re =:8. Two sets of measurements were used herein. The first was obtained with an adhesive tape at the airfoil upper and lower side at x=chord = %, in order to trigger boundary layer transition at these locations. Transition was let free for the second one.. Method A Cmesh was used to compute the flow around this airfoil with 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for the convective terms, together with the k! SST turbulence model by Menter [] for the turbulent viscosity. The transition was fixed at x=chord = % on both sides of the airfoil when comparing with the first set of measurements. The transition model by Michel [7], together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency, was used when comparing with freetransition measurements. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations.. Results For both cases (fixed and free transition), the computational results matched the experimental data in the linear region, but stall was predicted at a too high angle of attack, and a greater maximum lift was computed. However, results were in slightly better agreement for the case with free transition. 7 Risfi R 8(EN)
77 FFAW, Fixed Transition... y/chord Figure.FFAW Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (FFAW, Fixed Transition, [7]) Risfi R 8(EN) 77
78 .. Drag Coefficient.. Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (FFAW, Fixed Transition, [7])... Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (FFAW, Fixed Transition, [7]) 78 Risfi R 8(EN)
79 (a) ff =: o (b) ff =7:99 o (c) ff =:7 o (d) ff =:98 o (e) ff =7: o (f) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (FFAW, Fixed Transition, [7]) Risfi R 8(EN) 79
80 (a) ff =: o (b) ff =7:99 o (c) ff =:7 o (d) ff =:98 o (e) ff =7: o (f) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (FFAW, Fixed Transition) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
81 FFAW, Free Transition... y/chord Figure 7.FFAW Airfoil.8... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 8. Lift Coefficient Curve (FFAW, Free Transition, [7]) Risfi R 8(EN) 8
82 .. Drag Coefficient.. Figure 9. Drag Coefficient Curve (FFAW, Free Transition, [7]).. Pitching Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (FFAW, Free Transition, [7]) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
83 (a) ff =8: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =7: o (f) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (FFAW, Free Transition) Risfi R 8(EN) 8
84 (a) ff =8: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =7: o (f) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (FFAW, Free Transition) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
85 7 FFAW and FFAW Airfoils These two airfoils have been designed at FFA (The Aeronautical ResearchInstitute of Sweden) by Björk []. They are relatively thick and have been used on the inboard part of different Danish wind turbine blades. Measurements were carried out in the VELUX wind tunnel [], which has an open test section. The testing facility is described in detail by Fuglsang et al []. The Reynolds number was equal to : for both airfoils measurement campaigns. 7. Method The Cmeshes used for the computation had 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for the convective terms. As the turbulence level was relatively high in the wind tunnel, it was expected that a fully turbulent computation might give better results. Therefore, both fully turbulent simulations and computations with the Michel transition model [7], together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency,were conducted. The k! SST turbulence model by Menter [] was used for the turbulent viscosity. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations. 7. Results For both airfoils, the computational results and experimental data were in rather good agreement in the linear region. However, the fully turbulent computations predicted stall at a correct angle of attack, contrary to the simulations with free transition that predicted stall at a much higher angle of attack. Risfi R 8(EN) 8
86 FFAW... y/chord Figure.FFAW Airfoil.8.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.. Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (FFAW, []) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
87 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Drag Coefficient.. Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (FFAW, [])...  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (FFAW, []) Risfi R 8(EN) 87
88  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =: o (b) ff =9:89 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =:9 o (d) ff =: o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =7:888 o (f) ff =:88 o Figure 7. Distributions (FFAW, []) 88 Risfi R 8(EN)
89 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =: o (b) ff =9:89 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =:9 o (d) ff =: o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =7:888 o (f) ff =:88 o Figure 8. Distributions (FFAW) Risfi R 8(EN) 89
90 FFAW... y/chord Figure 9.FFAW Airfoil.8  Fully turbulent  Transition model.. Lift Coefficient Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (FFAW, []) 9 Risfi R 8(EN)
91 ..  Fully turbulent  Transition model. Drag Coefficient..... Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (FFAW, []) Fully turbulent  Transition model. Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (FFAW, []) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
92  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =: o (b) ff =: o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =9: o (d) ff =:8 o  Fully turbulent  Transition model  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =: o (f) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (FFAW, []) 9 Risfi R 8(EN)
93 .  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (a) ff =: o (b) ff =: o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (c) ff =: o (d) ff =:8 o.  Fully turbulent  Transition model.  Fully turbulent  Transition model (e) ff =: o (f) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (FFAW) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
94 8 S89 and S8 Airfoils The S89 airfoil is a % thick wind turbine airfoil that has been designed at National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Colorado, USA, by Somers []. The two primary design criteria were restrained maximum lift, insensitive to surface roughness, and low profile drag. The S8 airfoil is a % thick wind turbine airfoil that has been designed at National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Colorado, USA, by Somers []. The first objective was to achieve a maximum lift coefficient of at least. for a Reynolds numberof:. The second objective was to obtain low profile drag coefficients over the range of lift coefficients from. to. for the same Reynolds number. The experiments were carried out at the lowturbulence wind tunnel at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. The Reynolds number of the experiments was Re = :, and the experimental results exposed herein were obtained with free transition. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations. 8. Method The Cmesh used for the computations had 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for the convective terms, the k! SST turbulence model by Menter [] for the turbulent viscosity, and the transition model bymichel [7], together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency. 8. Results There was a good agreement between experimental data and computational results in the linear region. A higher maximum lift was computed in the stalled region. 9 Risfi R 8(EN)
95 S89... y/chord Figure.S89Airfoil.. Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (S89, Delft University of Technology) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
96 ... Drag Coefficient.8... Figure 7. Drag Coefficient Curve (S89, Delft University of Technology)..8 Moment Coefficient... Figure 8. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (S89, Delft University of Technology) 9 Risfi R 8(EN)
97 (a) ff =: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =: o (f) ff =8: o Figure 9. Distributions (S89) Risfi R 8(EN) 97
98 (a) ff =: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =: o (f) ff =8: o Figure. Distributions (S89) 98 Risfi R 8(EN)
99 S8... y/chord Figure.S8Airfoil... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (S8, Delft University of Technology) Risfi R 8(EN) 99
100 ... Drag Coefficient.8... Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (S8, Delft University of Technology)... Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (S8, Delft University of Technology) Risfi R 8(EN)
101 (a) ff =: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =: o (f) ff =8: o Figure. Distributions (S8) Risfi R 8(EN)
102 (a) ff =: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =: o (f) ff =8: o Figure. Distributions (S8) Risfi R 8(EN)
103 9 FXS9V Airfoil The FXS9V airfoil is a 9% thick airfoil designed by Althaus and Wortmann []. It is a typical laminar airfoil where transitional effects are large since laminar flow is present over the majority of the airfoil surface. The Reynolds number of the experiment was :. The experiment was carried out in the Laminar Wind Tunnel at the Institut for Aerodynamics and Gasdynamics in Stuttgart []. 9. Method The Cmesh used for the computation had 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for the convective terms, the k! SST turbulence model by Menter [] for the turbulent viscosity, and the transition model bymichel [7], together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations. 9. Results There was a very good agreement between the experiment and the computations concerning the lift. The drag was slightly overestimated by the computations. Risfi R 8(EN)
104 FXS9V... y/chord Figure 7. FXS9V Airfoil... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure 8. Lift Coefficient Curve (FXS9V, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
105 ..8 Drag Coefficient... Figure 9. Drag Coefficient Curve (FXS9V, []).. Moment Coefficient..8.. Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (FXS9V) Risfi R 8(EN)
106 (a) ff =8: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =: o (f) ff =8: o Figure. Distributions (FXS9V) Risfi R 8(EN)
107 (a) ff =8: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =: o (f) ff =8: o Figure. Distributions (FXS9V) Risfi R 8(EN) 7
108 DU 9W and DU 9W Airfoils The % thick wind turbine airfoil DU 9W was designed by Timmer []. Its design goals for the laminar case were a peak lift coefficient of about., relatively smooth stall and insensivity to roughness. The measurements were performed in the lowspeed lowturbulence wind tunnel of the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering of Delft University []. The results presented herein were obtained at a Reynolds number of : with a smooth airfoil surface. The % thick wind turbine airfoil DU 9W was designed by Timmer and wind tunnel tested in the same low speed wind tunnel at Delft University of Technology.. Method The Cmesh used for the computation had 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for the convective terms, the k! SST turbulence model by Menter [] for the turbulent viscosity, and the transition model bymichel [7], together with the empirical function given by Chen and Thyson [8] for modelling the turbulence intermittency. Numerical results were obtained with stationary computations.. Results There was a rather good agreementbetween experiments and computations in the linear region, but the lift was overpredicted by the computations in deep stall. 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
109 DU 9W... y/chord Figure. DU 9W Airfoil... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (DU 9W, []) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
110 ... Drag Coefficient Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (DU 9W, []).. Moment Coefficient....9 Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (DU 9W, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
111 (a) ff =7:8: o (b) ff =9:7 o (c) ff =:7 o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =:9 o (f) ff =: o Figure 7. Distributions (DU 9W, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
112 (a) ff =7:8 o (b) ff =9:7 o (c) ff =:7: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =:9 o (f) ff =: o Figure 8. Distributions (DU 9W) Risfi R 8(EN)
113 DU 9W... y/chord Figure 9. DU 9W Airfoil... Lift Coefficient.8... Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (DU 9W, Delft University of Technology) Risfi R 8(EN)
114 ... Drag Coefficient.8... Figure. Drag Coefficient Curve (DU 9W, Delft University of Technology)... Moment Coefficient Figure. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (DU 9W, Delft University of Technology) Risfi R 8(EN)
115 (a) ff =8: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =8: o (f) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (DU 9W) Risfi R 8(EN)
116 (a) ff =8: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =: o (d) ff =: o (e) ff =8: o (f) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (DU 9W) Risfi R 8(EN)
117 AAirfoil The AAirfoil was chosen as a test case for validating several numerical codes by the partners of the ECARP project []. s were carried out in the F and F wind tunnels at ONERA/FAUGA. The Reynolds number of the experiment was Re =:.. Method The Cmesh used for the computation had 8 cells in the direction along the airfoil, of them being on the airfoil, and cells in the direction away from the airfoil. The nondimensional height of the cell at the airfoil was. The computations were performed with the SUDSscheme for the convective terms, and the k! SST turbulence model by Menter [] for the turbulent viscosity. The analysis of the measurements shows that the transition on the upper side of the airfoil occured at a fixed location x=chord = :. Therefore, the transition was also fixed in the computations. On the lower side, the transition was fixed both in the experiment and the computations at x=chord = :.. Results There was a good agreement between the experiment and the computations in the linear region. Higher maximum lift was predicted by the computations. exhibits a strange and unexplainable behavior for a small range of angles of attack before stall. Risfi R 8(EN) 7
118 AAirfoil... y/chord Figure.AAirfoil.8.. Lift Coefficient Figure. Lift Coefficient Curve (AAirfoil, []) 8 Risfi R 8(EN)
119 ..8.. Drag Coefficient Figure 7. Drag Coefficient Curve (AAirfoil, [])... Moment Coefficient Figure 8. Pitching Moment Coefficient Curve (AAirfoil) Risfi R 8(EN) 9
120 (a) ff =: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =7: o (d) ff =8: o (e) ff =: o Figure 9. Distributions (AAirfoil, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
121 (a) ff =: o (b) ff =: o (c) ff =7: o (d) ff =8: o (e) ff =: o Figure. Distributions (AAirfoil, []) Risfi R 8(EN)
122 Analysis of the Collected Results In this section, an analysis of the data that have been collected for the numerous airfoils is attempted. The main objective is to be able to evaluate a priori how good the numerical code will perform for a given airfoil. Firstly, quantitative values assessing the agreement between experimental data and computational results from are calculated. Secondly, airfoils for which the numerical code can be considered as performing well and those for which it performs poorly are sorted with the help of those values. Finally, some conclusions can be drawn concerning the ability of the numerical code to simulate the flow around certain types of airfoils. These conclusions can give some hints for the design of future airfoils, as far as the numerical code may beinvolved as atoolinthe design process; but also to a greater extent as they can reveal characteristic facts about the actual flow.. Quantitative criteria Quantitative values measuring the discrepancies between experimental data and computational results for each airfoil are gathered in Table, p.7. For each airfoil, the following four criterionvalues are computed:. The difference of lift between experiment and computations averaged over the linear region, expressed in percentage relatively to the maximum experimental lift coefficient, is calculated.. Theangleofattack for which stall occurs is considered. The angle for which a maximum of lift coefficient is first reached is reported. Then, the difference between the experimental and the computational values is evaluated in percentage relatively to the corresponding experimental angle (Note that in this case, the maximum lift location is searched close after the linear region, even if the lift coefficient grows again after stall, as it can be the case for some experiments).. The difference of maximum lift at the previously detected two points is evaluated in percentage relatively to the experimental maximum lift.. The maximum difference of lift (at a given angle of attack) in the stalled region is expressed in percentage relatively to the maximum experimental lift. It should be noted that, when both fully turbulent computations and simulations with transition model were available, the latter ones were used for calculating these four values.. Classifying the airfoils In this second step of the analysis, the airfoils for which the results obtained with are in good agreement with the experimental data are first collected. Then the airfoils for which results are in large disagreement with the experiments are collected. To select the airfoils that perform well, the three following conditions using the previously computed criterionvalues are evaluated: ffl The first criterionvalue is below % Risfi R 8(EN)
123 ffl The second criterionvalue is below % ffl The third or fourth criterionvalue is below % The airfoils that fulfil all these criteria are considered to be the ones that perform well. Note that the first condition is assumed to be satisfied for all the NACA airfoils in section (see the comments in section.). The limiting percentages have been chosen in order to make a clear distinction between the airfoils. At the same time, the limits are considered to be sensible as for the respective importance of the several criteria. These airfoils can be roughly classified from the best one to the worst one as: ) FXS9V ) NACA  ) NACA  ) NACA (V) ) NACA (V) ) NACA 8 7) NACA 8 8) NACA FFAW 9) S8 They are depicted in Fig.. Note that the NACA  and NACA  airfoils have not been included even though they fulfil the above criteria. It was considered that they would not significantly improve the amount of data involved with airfoils from the NACA wing section family that have been already selected for the next step of the analysis. The airfoils that perform poorly are selected next. They are defined to be the ones for which strictly more than two of the following conditions are satisfied: ffl The first criterionvalue is over % ffl The second criterionvalue is over % ffl The third criterionvalue is over % ffl The fourth criterionvalue is over % These airfoils can be roughly classified from the worst one to the best one as: ) NACA (V) ) FFAW (Fixed Tr.) ) RISχA ) NACA  ) NACA  ) NACA  They are depicted in Fig... Interpretation of the selected airfoils data It is now attempted to correlate some characteristics of the previously selected airfoils with the quality of the results. It would be interesting to relate the performance of the code to purely geometrical characteristics of the airfoils. Therefore, both the maximum relative thickness and the maximum curvature near the leading edge of the selected airfoils are reported in Table, p.7. The curvatures of the airfoils surfaces in the vicinity of the leading edge are plotted on Figs.(a) and (b). It can be concluded that poorlyperforming airfoils are somewhat thicker than wellperforming airfoils, whereas the latter ones have a rather more curved leading edge. However, these conclusions highlight a general tendency, but these are not clearly decisive factors. Risfi R 8(EN)
Aerodynamic investigation of Winglets on Wind Turbine Blades using CFD
RisøR1543(EN) Aerodynamic investigation of Winglets on Wind Turbine Blades using CFD Jeppe Johansen and Niels N. Sørensen Risø National Laboratory Roskilde Denmark February 26 Author: Jeppe Johansen
More informationDesign of the LRP airfoil series using 2D CFD
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Design of the LRP airfoil series using 2D CFD To cite this article: Frederik Zahle et al 2014 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 524 012020 View the article online for
More informationAdjustment of the kω SST turbulence model for prediction of airfoil characteristics near stall
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Adjustment of the ω SST turbulence model for prediction of airfoil characteristics near stall To cite this article: A A Matyusheno and A V Garbaru
More informationNumerical and Experimental Investigations of Lift and Drag Performances of NACA 0015 Wind Turbine Airfoil
International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, Vol. 3, No., February 2 Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Lift and Drag Performances of NACA Wind Turbine Airfoil İzzet Şahin
More informationComputational Investigation of Airfoils with Miniature Trailing Edge Control Surfaces
AIAA245 Computational Investigation of Airfoils with Miniature Trailing Edge Control Surfaces HakTae Lee, Ilan M. Kroo Stanford University, Stanford, CA 9435 Abstract Miniature trailing edge effectors
More informationAerofoil Profile Analysis and Design Optimisation
Journal of Aerospace Engineering and Technology Volume 3, Issue 2, ISSN: 2231038X Aerofoil Profile Analysis and Design Optimisation Kondapalli Siva Prasad*, Vommi Krishna, B.B. Ashok Kumar Department
More informationWind Tunnel Tests of Wind Turbine Airfoils at High Reynolds Numbers
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Wind Tunnel Tests of Wind Turbine Airfoils at High Reynolds Numbers To cite this article: E Llorente et al 014 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 54 0101 View the article
More informationLowSpeed NaturalLaminarFlow Airfoils: Case Study in Inverse Airfoil Design
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT Vol. 38, No. 1, January February 2001 LowSpeed NaturalLaminarFlow Airfoils: Case Study in Inverse Airfoil Design Ashok Gopalarathnam and Michael S. Selig University of Illinois at
More informationNumerical Analysis of Wings for UAV based on HighLift Airfoils
Numerical Analysis of Wings for UAV based on HighLift Airfoils Sachin Srivastava Department of Aeronautical Engineering Malla Reddy College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Swetha
More informationDesign of a family of new advanced airfoils for low wind class turbines
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Design of a family of new advanced airfoils for low wind class turbines To cite this article: Francesco Grasso 2014 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 555 012044 View
More informationAN EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF THE AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS AN OSCILLATORY PITCHING NACA0012 AEROFOIL
AN EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL STUDY OF THE AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS AN OSCILLATORY PITCHING NACA0012 AEROFOIL Ashim Yadav, Simon Prince & Jenny Holt School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing,
More informationSTUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF A GAP BETWEEN THE WING AND SLOTTED FLAP ON THE AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ULTRALIGHT AIRCRAFT WING AIRFOIL
Review of the Air Force Academy No 3 (30) 2015 STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF A GAP BETWEEN THE WING AND SLOTTED FLAP ON THE AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ULTRALIGHT AIRCRAFT WING AIRFOIL 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationEXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF LIFT & DRAG PERFORMANCE OF NACA0012 WIND TURBINE AEROFOIL
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF LIFT & DRAG PERFORMANCE OF NACA0012 WIND TURBINE AEROFOIL Mr. Sandesh K. Rasal 1, Mr. Rohan R. Katwate 2 1 PG Student, 2 Assistant Professor, DYPSOEA Ambi Talegaon, Heat Power
More informationEXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY OF A TWO ELEMENT WING WITH GURNEY FLAP
25 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY OF A TWO ELEMENT WING WITH GURNEY FLAP F.M. Catalano PhD.( catalano@sc.usp.br ) *, G. L. Brand * * Aerodynamic
More informationOptimized NaturalLaminarFlow Airfoils
Optimized NaturalLaminarFlow Airfoils J. Driver and D. W. Zingg University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies 4925 Dufferin Street, Toronto, Ontario Canada, M3H 5T6 A twodimensional NewtonKrylov
More informationAERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRFOIL WITH SINGLE SLOTTED FLAP FOR LIGHT AIRPLANE WING
HENRI COANDA AIR FORCE ACADEMY ROMANIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE of SCIENTIFIC PAPER AFASES 2015 Brasov, 2830 May 2015 GENERAL M.R. STEFANIK ARMED FORCES ACADEMY SLOVAK REPUBLIC AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS
More informationDESIGN OF AN AERODYNAMIC MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE AIRFOILS
DESIGN OF AN AERODYNAMIC MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE AIRFOILS L. VelázquezAraque 1 and J. Nožička 1 1 Department of Fluid Dynamics and Power Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
More informationAIRFOIL PROFILE OPTIMIZATION OF AN AIR SUCTION EQUIPMENT WITH AN AIR DUCT
THERMAL SCIENCE, Year 2015, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 12171222 1217 AIRFOIL PROFILE OPTIMIZATION OF AN AIR SUCTION EQUIPMENT WITH AN AIR DUCT by Li QIU a,b, Rui WANG a,*, XiaoDong CHEN b, and DePeng WANG
More informationA COMPARATIVE FLOW ANALYSIS OF NACA 6409 AND NACA 4412 AEROFOIL
A COMPARATIVE FLOW ANALYSIS OF NACA 6409 AND NACA 4412 AEROFOIL MD. Safayet Hossain 1, Muhammad Ferdous Raiyan 2, Mohammed Nasir Uddin Akanda 3, Nahed Hassan Jony 4 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering,
More informationDetermination of the wind pressure distribution on the facade of the triangularly shaped highrise building structure
Determination of the wind pressure distribution on the facade of the triangularly shaped highrise building structure Norbert Jendzelovsky 1,*, Roland Antal 1 and Lenka Konecna 1 1 STU in Bratislava, Faculty
More informationAbstract A method for design of wind turbine airfoils is presented. The design method is based on direct numerical optimization of a Bspline represen
Design of the Wind Turbine Airfoil Family RISØAXX RisøR1024(EN) Kristian S. Dahl, Peter Fuglsang Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark December 1998 Abstract A method for design of wind turbine airfoils
More informationTHEORY OF WINGS AND WIND TUNNEL TESTING OF A NACA 2415 AIRFOIL. By Mehrdad Ghods
THEORY OF WINGS AND WIND TUNNEL TESTING OF A NACA 2415 AIRFOIL By Mehrdad Ghods Technical Communication for Engineers The University of British Columbia July 23, 2001 ABSTRACT Theory of Wings and Wind
More informationStudy on the Shock Formation over Transonic Aerofoil
Advances in Aerospace Science and Applications. ISSN 22773223 Volume 3, Number 2 (2013), pp. 113118 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/aasa.htm Study on the Shock Formation over
More informationHigh Sweptback Delta Wing Flow
Advanced Materials Research Submitted: 20140625 ISSN: 16628985, Vol. 1016, pp 377382 Accepted: 20140625 doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1016.377 Online: 20140828 2014 Trans Tech Publications,
More informationStatic Extended Trailing Edge for Lift Enhancement: Experimental and Computational Studies
Static Extended Trailing Edge for Lift Enhancement: Experimental and Computational Studies T. Liu, J. Montefort, W. Liou Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, MI 49008 and Q. Shams NASA Langley Research
More informationAPPLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS AT LM WIND POWER
APPLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS AT LM WIND POWER Herning / March 27 / 2014 By Jesper Madsen Chief Engineer Aerodynamics and Acoustics AGENDA 1. EUDP Projects 1. DANAERO MW 2. Optimization of vortex generators
More informationLEADINGEDGE VORTEX FLAPS FOR SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT CONFIGURATION EFFECTS OF FLAP CONFIGURATIONS AND ROUNDED LEADINGEDGES
ICAS 2002 CONGRESS LEADINGEDGE VORTEX FLAPS FOR SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT CONFIGURATION EFFECTS OF FLAP CONFIGURATIONS AND ROUNDED LEADINGEDGES Kenichi RINOIE*, Dong Youn KWAK**, Katsuhiro MIYATA* and Masayoshi
More informationCFD SIMULATION STUDY OF AIR FLOW AROUND THE AIRFOIL USING THE MAGNUS EFFECT
Magnus effect, simulation, air flow Patryk SOKOŁOWSKI *, Jacek CZARNIGOWSKI **, Paweł MAGRYTA *** CFD SIMULATION STUDY OF AIR FLOW AROUND THE AIRFOIL USING THE MAGNUS EFFECT Abstract The article presents
More informationCentre for Offshore Renewable Energy Engineering, School of Energy, Environment and Agrifood, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK 2
Fluid Structure Interaction Modelling of A Novel 10MW VerticalAxis Wind Turbine Rotor Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics and Finite Element Analysis Lin Wang 1*, Athanasios Kolios 1, PierreLuc Delafin
More informationAnalysis of Wind Turbine Blade
International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology EISSN 2277 4106, PISSN 23475161 2014 INPRESSCO, All Rights Reserved Available at http://inpressco.com/category/ijcet Research Article Analysis
More informationThe DANAERO MW Experiments Final report
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Dec 11, 2017 The DANAERO MW Experiments Final report Aagaard Madsen, Helge; Bak, Christian; Schmidt Paulsen, Uwe; Gaunaa, Mac; Fuglsang, Peter; Romblad, Jonas; Olesen,
More informationWind tunnel effects on wingtip vortices
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 47 January 2010, Orlando, Florida AIAA 2010325 Wind tunnel effects on wingtip vortices Xin Huang 1, Hirofumi
More informationAir Craft Winglet Design and Performance: Cant Angle Effect
Journal of Robotics and Mechanical Engineering Research Air Craft Winglet Design and Performance: Cant Angle Effect Eslam Said Abdelghany 1, Essam E Khalil 2*, Osama E Abdellatif 3 and Gamal elhariry 4
More informationAerofoil Design for Man Powered Aircraft
Man Powered Aircraft Group Aerofoil Design for Man Powered Aircraft By F. X. Wortmann Universitat Stuttgart From the Second Man Powered Aircraft Group Symposium Man Powered Flight The Way Ahead 7 th February
More informationParasite Drag. by David F. Rogers Copyright c 2005 David F. Rogers. All rights reserved.
Parasite Drag by David F. Rogers http://www.narassociates.com Copyright c 2005 David F. Rogers. All rights reserved. How many of you still have a Grimes rotating beacon on both the top and bottom of the
More informationSTUDIES ON THE OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE OF TAPERED VORTEX FLAPS
ICAS 2000 CONGRESS STUDIES ON THE OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE OF TAPERED VORTEX FLAPS Kenichi RINOIE Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 1138656, JAPAN Keywords: vortex flap,
More informationJOURNAL PUBLICATIONS
1 JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS 71. Lee, T., Mageed, A., Siddiqui, B. and Ko, L.S., (2016) Impact of ground proximity on aerodynamic properties of an unsteady NACA 0012 airfoil, submitted to Journal of Aerospace
More informationEFFECT OF GURNEY FLAPS AND WINGLETS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE HAWT
Chapter6 EFFECT OF GURNEY FLAPS AND WINGLETS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE HAWT 6.1 Introduction The gurney flap (wicker bill) was a small flat tab projecting from the trailing edge of a wing. Typically it
More informationNumerical study of aeroelasticity of sails
Numerical study of aeroelasticity of sails Alessandro Leone, Luciano Teresi* SMFM@DiS, Università Roma Tre, Roma, Italy * Corresponding author: Dip. of Studies on Structures, via Corrado Segre 6, 00146
More informationAerodynamic behavior of an airfoil with morphing trailing edge for wind turbine applications
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Aerodynamic behavior of an airfoil with morphing trailing edge for wind turbine applications To cite this article: T Wolff et al 24 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
More informationInvestigations on the Aerodynamic Forces of 2D Square Lattice Tower Section Using CFD
J. Energy Power Sources Vol. 1, No. 5, 2014, pp. 270277 Received: August 14, 2014, Published: November 30, 2014 Journal of Energy and Power Sources www.ethanpublishing.com Investigations on the Aerodynamic
More informationNumericalSimulationofVerticalAxisWindTurbineatLowSpeedRatios
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering: I Numerical Methods Volume 14 Issue 1 Version 1.0 Year 2014 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc.
More informationASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exhibition IMECE 2013 November 1521, 2013, San Diego, California, USA
ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exhibition IMECE 2013 November 1521, 2013, San Diego, California, USA IMECE201362734 AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF HORIZONTAL AXIS WIND TURBINE WITH
More informationADVANCES IN AERODYNAMICS OF WIND TURBINE BLADES
ADVANCES IN AERODYNAMICS OF WIND TURBINE BLADES Herning / October 3 / 2017 By Jesper Madsen Chief Engineer, Aerodynamics & Acoustics WIND ENERGY DENMARK Annual Event 2017 Agenda 1. Aerodynamic design and
More informationBlade Design and Performance Analysis of Wind Turbine
International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN( USA): IJCRGG ISSN : 09744290 Vol.5, No.2, pp 10541061, AprilJune 2013 ICGSEE2013[14 th 16 th March 2013] International Conference on Global Scenario
More informationUniversity of Bristol  Explore Bristol Research. Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Liu, X., Azarpeyvand, M., & Joseph, P. (2015). On the acoustic and aerodynamic performance of serrated airfoils. Paper presented at The 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Florence, France.
More informationAerodynamically Efficient Wind Turbine Blade S Arunvinthan 1, Niladri Shekhar Das 2, E Giriprasad 3 (Avionics, AISST Amity University, India)
International Journal of Engineering Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 6734, ISSN (Print): 2319 6726 Volume 3 Issue 4ǁ April 2014ǁ PP.4954 Aerodynamically Efficient Wind Turbine Blade S Arunvinthan
More informationTRAILING EDGE TREATMENT TO ENHANCE HIGH LIFT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
28 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES TRAILING EDGE TREATMENT TO ENHANCE HIGH LIFT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Catalano F.M.*, Ceròn E.D.* Greco P.C. * Laboratory of Aerodynamics EESCUSP Brazil
More informationNumerical Computations of Wind Turbine Wakes Using Full Rotor Modeling
2012 2nd International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES 2012) IPCSIT vol. 56 (2012) (2012) IACSIT Press, Singapore DOI: 10.7763/IPCSIT.2012.V56.21 Numerical Computations of Wind Turbine Wakes
More informationWind loads investigations of HAWT with wind tunnel tests and site measurements
loads investigations of HAWT with wind tunnel tests and site measurements Shigeto HIRAI, Senior Researcher, Nagasaki R&D Center, Technical Headquarters, MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDSUTRIES, LTD, Fukahori, Nagasaki,
More informationStudy on BiPlane Airfoils
Study on BiPlane Airfoils Experiment 5: Final Design Project MECHANICAL AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 108 WINDTUNNEL LAB Professor GameroCastaño cc: Rayomand Gundevia Date: 12/09/13 Jin Mok 49832571 1 Abstract...
More informationDESIGN OF THE MODERN FAMILY OF HELICOPTER AIRFOILS
DESIGN OF THE MODERN FAMILY OF HELICOPTER AIRFOILS Wojciech KANIA, Wienczys!aw STALEWSKI, BogumHa ZWIERCHANOWSKA Institute of Aviation Summary The paper presents results of numerical design and experimental
More informationIncreasing the power output of the Darrieus Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36. Increasing the power output of the Darrieus Vertical Axis Wind Turbine R. Ramkissoon 1 and K. Manohar
More informationInfluence of open trailing edge on laminar aerofoils at low Reynolds number
Influence of open trailing edge on laminar aerofoils at low Reynolds number Rodolfo Sant, Luis Ayuso and Jose Meseguer Abstract This article deals with the effect of open trailing edge on the aerodynamic
More informationDesign of a Flapped Laminar Airfoil for High Performance Sailplane
Design of a Flapped Laminar Airfoil for High Performance Sailplane Krzysztof Kubrynski 1 Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw, Poland The paper discusses
More informationLift for a Finite Wing. all real wings are finite in span (airfoils are considered as infinite in the span)
Lift for a Finite Wing all real wings are finite in span (airfoils are considered as infinite in the span) The lift coefficient differs from that of an airfoil because there are strong vortices produced
More informationImproved Aerodynamic Characteristics of Aerofoil Shaped Fuselage than that of the Conventional Cylindrical Shaped Fuselage
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 4, Issue 1, January213 1 Improved Aerodynamic Characteristics of Aerofoil Shaped Fuselage than that of the Conventional Cylindrical Shaped
More informationNumerical Study of GiromillType Wind Turbines with Symmetrical and Nonsymmetrical Airfoils
European International Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 8 October 2013 Numerical Study of GiromillType Wind Turbines with Symmetrical and Nonsymmetrical Airfoils Prathamesh Deshpande and
More informationAa irfoil design considerations
why that THE CONCEPT OF REYNOLDS NUMBERS SEEMS A LITTLE ABSTRACT, BUT ITS REALWORLD APPLICATION IS THAT IT REPRESENTS THE SCALING EFFECT ON AERODYNAMICS. 48 JULY 2008 irfoil? ericfoltz@istockphoto Aa
More informationControl Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cutout wind speeds
Control Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cutout wind speeds Helen Markou 1 Denmark and Torben J. Larsen, RisøDTU, P.O.box 49, DK4000 Roskilde, Abstract The importance of continuing
More informationPrinciples of glider flight
Principles of glider flight [ Lecture 1: Lift, drag & glide performance ] Richard Lancaster Email: Richard@RJPLancaster.net Twitter: @RJPLancaster ASK21 illustrations Copyright 1983 Alexander Schleicher
More informationBending a soccer ball with math
Bending a soccer ball with math Tim Chartier, Davidson College Aerodynamics in sports has been studied ever since Newton commented on the deviation of a tennis ball in his paper New theory of light and
More informationDYNAMIC STALL AND CAVITATION OF STABILISER FINS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE SHIP BEHAVIOUR
DYNAMIC STALL AND CAVITATION OF STABILISER FINS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE SHIP BEHAVIOUR Guilhem Gaillarde, Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN), the Netherlands SUMMARY The lifting characteristics
More informationEffects of seam and surface texture on tennis balls aerodynamics
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 34 (2012 ) 140 145 9 th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association (ISEA) Effects of seam and surface texture on tennis
More informationWind Tunnel Measurements on Details of Laminar Wings
Wind Tunnel Measurements on Details of Laminar Wings Jürgen Frey, Technische Universität Dresden Institut für Luft und Raumfahrttechnik, Arbeitsgruppe Experimentelle Aerodynamik Abstract Flow visualization
More informationA Numerical Study of Thickness Effect of the Symmetric NACA 4Digit Airfoils on Self Starting Capability of a 1kW HType Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications 2015; 3(31): 716 Published online February 13, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijmea) doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.s.2015030301.12
More informationCFD SIMULATIONS OF GAS DISPERSION IN VENTILATED ROOMS
CFD SIMULATIONS OF GAS DISPERSION IN VENTILATED ROOMS T. Gélain, C. Prévost Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Saclay, France Abstract In order to better understand the risks due
More informationTHE DESIGN OF WING SECTIONS
THE DESIGN OF WING SECTIONS Published in "Radio Control Model News" Issue Number 8 Winter 93 Aerofoil section design has advanced a great deal since great pioneers like Horatio Phillips experimented with
More informationAvailable online at Procedia Engineering 200 (2010) (2009) In situ drag measurements of sports balls
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 200 (2010) (2009) 2437 2442 000 000 Procedia Engineering www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia 8 th Conference of the International Sports Engineering
More informationThe Aerodynamic Design and Investigation of Loading Distribution of a Mixed Flow Compressor
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 00 (2014) 000 000 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia APISAT2014, 2014 AsiaPacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology,
More informationFLOW CONTROL ON HELICOPTERROTOR BLADES VIA ACTIVE GURNEY FLAP Wienczyslaw Stalewski* *Institute of Aviation, Poland
FLOW CONTROL ON HELICOPTERROTOR BLADES VIA ACTIVE GURNEY FLAP Wienczyslaw Stalewski* *Institute of Aviation, Poland Keywords: helicopter rotor blades, flow control, Active Gurney Flap, rotorcraft performance
More informationExperimental Investigation of the Aerodynamics of a Modeled Dragonfly Wing Section
Region IMA Student Conference AIAA  2005 April 89, 2005 / Charlottesville, Virginia Experimental Investigation of the Aerodynamics of a Modeled Dragonfly Wing Section Michelle Kwok * and Rajat Mittal
More informationResearch Article Numerical Analysis of Wind Turbine Airfoil Aerodynamic Performance with Leading Edge Bump
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 25, Article ID 493253, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/.55/25/493253 Research Article Numerical Analysis of Wind Turbine Airfoil Aerodynamic Performance with Leading
More informationEnhanced Airfoil Design Incorporating Boundary Layer Mixing Devices
AIAA20030211 Enhanced Airfoil Design Incorporating Boundary Layer Mixing Devices Michael Kerho and Brian Kramer Rolling Hills Research Corporation Torrance, CA 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting &
More informationWake effects at Horns Rev and their influence on energy production. Kraftværksvej 53 Frederiksborgvej 399. Ph.: Ph.
Wake effects at Horns Rev and their influence on energy production Martin Méchali (1)(*), Rebecca Barthelmie (2), Sten Frandsen (2), Leo Jensen (1), PierreElouan Réthoré (2) (1) Elsam Engineering (EE)
More informationAERODYNAMIC DESIGN AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE FOR SMALL HORIZONTALAXIS WIND TURBINE ROTOR BLADE. A Thesis
AERODYNAMIC DESIGN AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE FOR SMALL HORIZONTALAXIS WIND TURBINE ROTOR BLADE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In
More informationEXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF BODY KIT USED WITH SALOON CARS IN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
EXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF BODY KIT USED WITH SALOON CARS IN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM M.G., Yazdani, H. Ullah, T. Aderis and R. Zainulariffin, Faculty of Engineering, Institut
More informationWind tunnel tests of a nontypical stadium roof
Wind tunnel tests of a nontypical stadium roof G. Bosak 1, A. Flaga 1, R. Kłaput 1 and Ł. Flaga 1 1 Wind Engineering Laboratory, Cracow University of Technology, 31864 Cracow, Poland. liwpk@windlab.pl
More informationNUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOWFIELD IN A BLOWDOWN WIND TUNNEL
ICAS 2002 CONGRESS NUERICAL AND EXPERIENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOWFIELD IN A BLOWDOWN WIND TUNNEL Ali Rebaine, ahmood Khalid, Cabot Broughton and Fred Ellis Institute for Aerospace Research, National
More informationNew Technologies applied to the design and optimization of tunnel ventilation systems
New Technologies applied to the design and optimization of tunnel ventilation systems Ing. Justo Suárez Area Manager  ZITRON Dot. Ing. Massimiliano Bringiotti Managing Director  GEOTUNNEL Ing. Ana Belén
More informationSimulation of Free Surface Flows with Surface Tension with ANSYS CFX
Simulation of Free Surface Flows with Surface Tension with ANSYS CFX C. Kurt Svihla, Hong Xu ANSYS, Inc. Abstract Three different test cases involving free surface flows with surface tension were investigated
More informationWind resource assessment over a complex terrain covered by forest using CFD simulations of neutral atmospheric boundary layer with OpenFOAM
Wind resource assessment over a complex terrain covered by forest using CFD simulations of neutral atmospheric boundary layer with OpenFOAM Nikolaos Stergiannis nstergiannis.com nikolaos.stergiannis@vub.ac.be
More informationStudy of a Swept Wing with LeadingEdge Ice Using a Wake Survey Technique
51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 71 January 213, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas AIAA 213245 Study of a Swept Wing with LeadingEdge
More informationPower efficiency and aerodynamic forces measurements on the Dettwilerwind turbine
Institut für Fluiddynamik ETH Zentrum, ML H 33 CH8092 Zürich P rof. Dr. Thomas Rösgen Sonneggstrasse 3 Telefon +4144632 2646 Fax +4144632 1147 roesgen@ifd.mavt.ethz.ch www.ifd.mavt.ethz.ch Power efficiency
More informationAerodynamic Modification of CFR Formula SAE Race Car
Aerodynamic Modification of CFR Formula SAE Race Car Brandon M. Verhun, Trevor D. Haight, and Thomas A. Mahank Department of Mechanical Engineering Saginaw Valley State University University Center, MI
More informationBLADE DESIGN FOR WINDMILL GENERATOR MUHAMMMAD FITRI BIN MOHAMED HASSAN
BLADE DESIGN FOR WINDMILL GENERATOR MUHAMMMAD FITRI BIN MOHAMED HASSAN Report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Mechatronics Engineering Faculty of Manufacturing
More informationWind Tunnel Measurements on Details of Laminar Wings
Wind Tunnel Measurements on Details of Laminar Wings Jürgen Frey Juergen.Frey@tudresden.de Technische Universität Dresden Institut für Luft und Raumfahrttechnik Arbeitsgruppe Experimentelle Aerodynamik
More informationTHE CURVE OF THE CRICKET BALL SWING AND REVERSE SWING
Parabola Volume 32, Issue 2 (1996) THE CURVE OF THE CRICKET BALL SWING AND REVERSE SWING Frank Reid 1 It is a well known fact in cricket that the new ball when bowled by a fast bowler will often swing
More informationInduced Drag Reduction for Modern Aircraft without Increasing the Span of the Wing by Using Winglet
International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering IJMMEIJENS Vol:10 No:03 49 Induced Drag Reduction for Modern Aircraft without Increasing the Span of the Wing by Using Winglet Mohammad Ilias
More informationOPTIMIZING THE LENGTH OF AIR SUPPLY DUCT IN CROSS CONNECTIONS OF GOTTHARD BASE TUNNEL. Rehan Yousaf 1, Oliver Scherer 1
OPTIMIZING THE LENGTH OF AIR SUPPLY DUCT IN CROSS CONNECTIONS OF GOTTHARD BASE TUNNEL Rehan Yousaf 1, Oliver Scherer 1 1 Pöyry Infra Ltd, Zürich, Switzerland ABSTRACT Gotthard Base Tunnel with its 57 km
More informationApplications of Bernoulli s principle. Principle states that areas with faster moving fluids will experience less pressure
Applications of Bernoulli s principle Principle states that areas with faster moving fluids will experience less pressure Artery o When blood flows through narrower regions of arteries, the speed increases
More informationAerodynamic characteristics around the stalling angle of the discus using a PIV
10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY PIV13 Delft, The Netherlands, July 13, 2013 Aerodynamic characteristics around the stalling angle of the discus using a PIV Kazuya Seo 1 1 Department
More informationLow Reynolds Number Airfoil Design Lecture Notes
Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Design Lecture Notes Michael S. Selig Department of Aerospace Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Urbana, Illinois 6181 USA VKI Lecture Series Sponsored by
More informationIMPACT OF FUSELAGE CROSS SECTION ON THE STABILITY OF A GENERIC FIGHTER
IMPACT OF FUSELAGE CROSS SECTION ON THE STABILITY OF A GENERIC FIGHTER Robert M. Hall NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia ABSTRACT Many traditional data bases, which involved smoothsided forebodies,
More informationEffect of attack angle on flow characteristic of centrifugal fan
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER OPEN ACCESS Effect of attack angle on flow characteristic of centrifugal fan To cite this article: Y Wu et al 206 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci.
More informationComputational fluid dynamics analysis of a mixed flow pump impeller
MultiCraft International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology Vol. 2, No. 6, 2010, pp. 200206 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY www.ijestng.com 2010 MultiCraft Limited.
More informationNUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE FLOW AROUND A CCLASS CATAMARAN Filipe Santos Carvalho
NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE FLOW AROUND A CCLASS CATAMARAN Filipe Santos Carvalho filipe.s.carvalho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal December 2016 ABSTRACT
More informationInvestigation on Divergent Exit Curvature Effect on Nozzle Pressure Ratio of Supersonic Convergent Divergent Nozzle
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Investigation on Divergent Exit Curvature Effect on Nozzle Pressure Ratio of Supersonic Convergent Divergent Nozzle Shyamshankar.M.B*, Sankar.V** *(Department of Aeronautical
More informationVortical Patterns in the Wake of an Oscillating Airfoil
1200 AIAA JOURNAL VOL. 27, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 1989 Vortical Patterns in the Wake of an Oscillating Airfoil Manoochehr M. Koochesfahani* California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California The vortical
More informationOPTIMIZATION OF SINGLE STAGE AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSOR FOR DIFFERENT ROTATIONAL SPEED USING CFD
http:// OPTIMIZATION OF SINGLE STAGE AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSOR FOR DIFFERENT ROTATIONAL SPEED USING CFD Anand Kumar S malipatil 1, Anantharaja M.H 2 1,2 Department of Thermal Power Engineering, VTURO Gulbarga,
More information