SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF WEST COAST FISHERIES

Transcription

1 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF WEST COAST FISHERIES In relation to ALEXKOR s Marine Mining Concession Areas October 2017 Capricorn Marine Environmental (Pty) Ltd Unit 15 Foregate Square, FW de Klerk Boulevard, Foreshore, 8001

2

3 Contents 1. Introduction Spatial layers by fishing sector Small pelagic purse-seine Demersal trawl Demersal long-line (hake) Demersal long-line (shark) Large pelagic long-line Tuna pole Commercial (traditional) linefishery West coast rock lobster Abalone ranching... Error! Bookmark not defined Small-scale fisheries Beach-seine and gillnet fisheries Seaweed References Figure 1.1: Location of Marine Rights Concession Areas (shown in orange) Figure 2.1: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended off the west coast by the purse-seine sector targeting small pelagic species over the period 2000 to Fishing grounds are shown in relation to the location of Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m Figure 2.2: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the demersal trawl sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m Figure 2.3: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the demersal long-line sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m Figure 2.4: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the demersal shark-directed long-line sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m Figure 2.5: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the Namibian and South African large pelagic long-line sectors ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m Figure 2.6: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the South African tuna pole sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m Figure 2.7: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the South African tuna pole sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m Figure 2.8: Graph showing national catch recorded by the west coast rock lobster sectors for the period 2006 to Annual effort expenditure is indicated as the number of traps hauled Page i

4 Figure 2.9: Graph showing average monthly catch (kg) and effort (number of traps hauled) reported by the trapboat and bakkie sectors for west coast rock lobster over the period 2006 to Figure 2.10: Average catch per season (tons whole weight) of Jasus lalandii recorded by the nearshore (bakkie) sector for the years 2006 to 2016 in relation to Alexkor s Mining Rights Concession areas 554, 512, 513 and Green stars indicate the approximate position of targeted reefs Figure 2.11: Location of abalone ranching concession areas in relation to Alexkor s Mining Rights Concession areas 554, 512, 513 and Figure 2.12: Beach-seine and gillnet fishing areas and TAE (DAFF, 2014) Figure 2.13: Location of seaweed rights areas in relation to Alexkor s Mining Rights Concession areas 554, 512, 513 and Page ii

5 1. Introduction Alexkor RMC Pooling and Sharing JV (PSJV) holds numerous coastal and offshore marine diamond mining license areas (Mining Rights 554MRC, 10025MRC, 512MRC and 513MRC), covering Sea Concessions 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 3a, 4a and 4b, which it actively mines. Mining activities are currently undertaken in terms of three approved Environmental Management Programmes (EMPRs), as amended, two of which are applicable to the marine Mining Rights. The PSJV is in the process of amending its EMPRs for the marine Mining Rights in order to comply with the current requirements of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (No. 108 of 1998) (NEMA) and the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations 2014, as amended, and to ensure alignment with each other, all new legislation, environmental standards, as well as internal PSJV Performance Assessment Reports. The EMPR for the onshore Mining Right 550MRC, which was approved in April 2017, is not being amended as part of this process. SLR Environmental Consulting (Pty) Ltd (SLR), in association with Placer Resource Management (Pty) Ltd (PRM), has been appointed to undertake the EMPR amendment process in terms of the NEMA, and in turn have commissioned to provide a spatial assessment on the distribution of commercial fisheries off the West Coast in the vicinity of the marine mining right areas. The marine licence areas comprise of, a portion of the Orange River channel, the Surf Zone, and certain sea areas (refer to Figure 1.1). Licence: 554MRC, Comprising 1. Centre line of the Orange River, to the bank of the following properties: a. Farm corridor Wes No. 2 b. Portion 17 (a portion of Portion 8) c. Portion 16 (a portion of Portion 9) d. Portion 15 (a portion of Portion 10) e. Arrisdrif No. 616 f. Farm No. 1 g. Farm Brandkaros No Surf zone along Farm No. 1 and Farm Sea Area 1 a 4. Sea Area 2 a 5. Sea Area 3 a 6. Sea Area 1 b Licence: 512MRC, Comprising Sea Area 4 a Licence: 513MRC, Comprising Sea Area 4 b Licence: 10025MR, Comprising Sea Area 1 c Table 1: List of West Coast fisheries sectors, date range of data acquired and minimum distance of fishing ground from Alexkor s mining rights concession areas. Sector Data Range Comment/ Scale resolution 1 Small pelagic purse-seine No overlap (45 km from MRC) 2 Demersal trawl No overlap (140 km from MRC) 3 Demersal long-line (hake) No overlap (90 km from MRC) 4 Demersal long-line (shark) No overlap (400 km from MRC) 5 Large pelagic long-line No overlap (180 km from MRC) 6 Tuna pole Traditional Linefish Overlap with MRC No overlap (200 km from MRC with negligible/ incidental fishing effort in close vicinity of MRC) Page 1

6 Sector Data Range Comment/ Scale resolution 8 West coast rock lobster (inshore sector) 9 West coast rock lobster (offshore sector) Overlap with MRC No overlap 10 Abalone ranching 2016 Overlap with MRC 11 Small-scale fisheries 2016 Overlap with MRC 12 Beach-seine and gill-net Overlap with MRC 13 Seaweed Overlap with MRC Figure 1.1: Location of Marine Rights Concession Areas (shown in orange). Page 2

7 2. Spatial layers by fishing sector 2.1 Small pelagic purse-seine The pelagic-directed purse-seine fishery targeting pilchard (Sardinops ocellatus), anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and red-eye round herring (Etrumeus whitheadii) is the largest South African fishery by volume (tonnes landed) and the second most important in terms of economic value. The abundance and distribution of these small pelagic species fluctuates considerably in accordance with the upwelling ecosystem in which they exist. Fish are targeted in inshore waters, primarily along the West and South Coasts of the Western Cape and the Eastern Cape coast, up to a maximum offshore distance of about 100 km. The majority of the fleet of 101 vessels operate from St Helena Bay, Laaiplek, Saldanha Bay and Hout Bay with fewer vessels operating on the South Coast from the harbours of Gansbaai, Mossel Bay and Port Elizabeth. Ports of deployment correspond to the location of canning factories and fish reduction plants along the coast. Figure 2.1 shows the spatial extent of fishing grounds, which are situated more than 45 km southward of Alexkor s MRC areas. Based on the commercial records for the period 2000 to 2016, there has been no recorded fishing activity within the MRC areas. 2.2 Demersal trawl South Africa s primary fisheries in terms of highest economic value are the trawl and long-line sectors targeting Cape hakes (Merluccius paradoxus and M. capensis). Secondary species include a large assemblage of demersal fish of which monkfish (Lophius vomerinus), kingklip (Genypterus capensis) and snoek (Thyrsites atun) are the most commercially important. The demersal trawl fishery comprises an offshore and inshore fleet, which differ primarily in terms of vessel capacity and the areas in which they operate. Approximately 45 offshore vessels operate from most major harbours on both the West and South Coasts. Trawlers target fish at an approximate depth range of 300 m to m with fishing grounds extending in an almost continuous band along the shelf edge from the Namibian maritime border in the north to Port Elizabeth in the East. The inshore fleet comprises approximately 30 vessels which operate off the South Coast from the harbours of Mossel Bay and Port Elizabeth. Inshore grounds are located on the Agulhas Bank and extend eastward towards the Great Kei River. Sole is targeted at a water depth range of between 50 m and 80 m, while hake is targeted at depths of between 100 m and 160 m. Figure 2.9 shows the West Coast demersal trawling grounds in relation to Alexkor s MRC areas. Off the West Coast (westward of 20 E) the fishery is prohibited from operating within five nautical miles of the coastline and targeted fishing areas are situated at least 140 km from Alexkor s MRC areas. Page 3

8 Figure 2.1: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended off the west coast by the purse-seine sector targeting small pelagic species over the period 2000 to Fishing grounds are shown in relation to the location of Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m. Page 4

9 Figure 2.2: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the demersal trawl sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m. Page 5

10 2.3 Demersal long-line (hake) Like the demersal trawl fishery, the target species of the long-line fishery is the Cape hakes, with a small amount of non-targeted commercial by-catch. Currently 64 hake-directed vessels are active within the fishery, most of which operate from the harbours of Cape Town and Hout Bay. Fishing grounds are similar to those targeted by the hake-directed trawl fleet. Off the West Coast, vessels target fish along the shelf break from Port Nolloth (15 E, 29 S) to the Agulhas Bank (21 E, 37 S). Lines are set parallel to bathymetric contours and to a maximum depth of m, in places. Figure 2.3 shows the West Coast demersal long-line grounds in relation to Alexkor s MRC areas. Off the West Coast (westward of 20 E) the fishery is prohibited from operating within five nautical miles of the coastline and targeted fishing areas are situated at least 90 km from Alexkor s MRC areas. Figure 2.3: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the demersal long-line sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m. Page 6

11 2.4 Demersal long-line (shark) Capture of demersal shark species occurs primarily in the demersal shark long-line fishery whilst catches of pelagic shark species occurs primarily in the large pelagic sector that targets tuna and swordfish. Prior to 2006, both demersal and pelagic shark catches were managed as a single shark fishery. The demersal shark fishery targets soupfin shark (Galeorhinus galeus), smooth-hound shark (Mustelus spp.), spiny dogfish (Squalus spp), St Joseph shark (Callorhinchus capensis), Charcharhinus spp., rays and skates. Other species which are not targeted but may be landed include cape gurnards (Chelidonichthys capensis), false jacopever (Sebastichthys capensis) and smooth hammerhead shark (Sphyrna zygaena). The fishery operates within coastal waters and catches are landed at the harbours of Cape Town, Hout Bay, Mossel Bay, Plettenberg Bay, Cape St Francis, Saldanha Bay, St Helena Bay, Gansbaai and Port Elizabeth. There are currently six permit holders that have been issued with long-term rights to operate within the fishery. With a low number of rights allocated, fishing effort has remained relatively low. Over the period 2007 to 2015, the fishery reported an annual average of hooks set and 134 tons landed annually. Figure 2.4 shows the spatial distribution of fishing activity off the West Coast and in relation to Alexkor s MRC areas. Grounds are situated at least 400 km southward of Alexkor s MRC areas. 2.5 Large pelagic long-line Highly migratory tuna and tuna-like species are caught on the high seas and seasonally within the South African Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) by long-line and pole fisheries. Targeted species include albacore (Thunnus alalunga), bigeye tuna (T. obesus), yellowfin tuna (T. albacares) and swordfish (Xiphias gladius). Tuna, tuna-like species and billfishes are migratory stocks and are therefore managed as a shared resource amongst various countries under the jurisdiction of the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) and the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC). In the 1970s to mid-1990s the fishery was exclusively operated by Asian fleets (up to 130 vessels) under bilateral agreements with South Africa. From the early 1990s these vessels were banned from South African waters and South Africa went through a period of low fishing activity as fishing rights issues were resolved. Thereafter a domestic fishery developed and 50 fishing rights were allocated to South Africans only. These rights holders now include a small fleet of local longliners although the fishery is still undertaken primarily with Japanese vessels fishing in joint ventures with South African companies. There are currently 30 commercial large pelagic fishing rights issued and 21 vessels active in the fishery. The fishery operates extensively within the South African EEZ, primarily along the continental shelf break and further offshore. Figure 2.5 shows the spatial distribution of fishing activity off the West Coast of South Africa and southern Namibia and in relation to Alexkor s MRC areas. Vessels operate predominantly from the shelf break and into deeper waters and are prohibited from operating within 12 nm of the coastline. Targeted fishing areas are situated approximately 180 km offshore of Alexkor s MRC areas, although incidental fishing activity has been recorded shallower than this. Page 7

12 Figure 2.4: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the demersal shark-directed long-line sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m. Page 8

13 Figure 2.5: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the Namibian and South African large pelagic long-line sectors ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m. Page 9

14 2.6 Tuna pole Poling for tuna is predominantly based on the southern Atlantic longfin tuna stock also referred to as albacore (T. alalunga). Other catch species include yellowfin tuna, bigeye tuna, skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis), snoek and yellowtail. The South African fleet is currently comprised of 128 vessels based at the ports of Cape Town, Hout Bay and Saldanha Bay. Fishing occurs along the entire West Coast, along the shelf break and beyond the 200 m isobath. Targeted fishing areas are situated north of Cape Columbine and between 60 km and 120 km offshore from Saldanha Bay and the Cape Canyon. Within southern Namibian waters albacore is targeted at Tripp Seamount, located south of Lüderitz. The fishery is seasonal with vessels active predominantly between November and May and peak catches recorded from November to January. Effort fluctuates according to the availability of fish in the area, but once a shoal of tuna is located a number of vessels will move into the area and target a single shoal which may remain in the area for days at a time. Figure 2.6 shows the spatial distribution of fishing activity off the West Coast of South Africa and in relation to Alexkor s MRC areas. Negligible levels of fishing effort have been reported in close proximity to the MRC areas; however there is no expected overlap of any of the MRC areas with grounds fished by the tuna pole sector. The closest targeted fishing areas are situated over Tripp Seamount (southern Namibian waters) which is located approximately 200 km from the MRC areas. 2.7 Commercial (traditional) line fishery The linefishery is divided into the commercial and recreational sectors, with the subsistence sector now falling under the classification of small-scale fishing. The commercial (or traditional) linefishery is the country s third most important fishery in terms of total tons landed and economic value. It is a long-standing, nearshore fishery based on a large assemblage of different species. Within the Western Cape the predominant catch species is snoek (Thyrsites atun) while other species such as Cape bream (hottentot) (Pachymetopon blochii), geelbek (Atractoscion aequidens), kob (Argyrosomus japonicus) and yellowtail (Seriola lalandi) are also important. Towards the East Coast the number of catch species increases and includes resident reef fish (Sparidae and Serranidae), pelagic migrants (Carangidae and Scombridae) and demersal migrants (Sciaenidae and Sparidae). The fishery operates along almost the entire coastline (excluding certain protected areas) from Port Nolloth on the West Coast to Cape Vidal on the East Coast. Effort is managed geographically with the spatial effort of the fishery divided into three zones. Most of the catch (up to 95%) is landed by the Cape commercial fishery, which operates on the continental shelf from the Namibian border on the West Coast to the Kei River in the Eastern Cape. Alexkor s MRC areas coincides with linefish management Zone A which extends from the Namibian border to Cape Infanta. Fishing vessels generally range up to a maximum offshore distance of about 70 km, although fishing at this outer limit and beyond is sporadic (C. Wilke, pers. comm 1 ). The traditional linefishery is defined by the use of a simple hook-and-line fishing system (excluding the use of longlines and drumlines), with a limit of 10 hooks per line (DAFF 2017). There are 450 vessels operating in the fishery, making it the largest fishing fleet in South Africa. Vessels are monitored by Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) and permit conditions require that catch be reported for each fishing trip; however, logbook data are unverified and may underestimate total landings (da Silva et al., 2015). The recreational linefishery includes shore- and boat-based fishing with the predominant use of rod and line. An estimated participants are active in the recreational sector (Griffiths and Lamberth, 2002). Community-based fishing of linefish species for subsistence purposes is now managed under South Africa s small-scale fishery policy which was implemented in 2016 (DAFF 2016). 1 Mr C. Wilke (christopherw@daff.gov.za) is the chief technician at DAFF and is the principle contact for linefish data collation. Page 10

15 Figure 2.6: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the South African tuna pole sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m. Fishing activity is reported by landing point. In the vicinity of Alexkor s MRC areas, the relevant landing location is Port Nolloth where an average annual catch of 2.7 tons was reported for the period 2000 to This is equivalent to between 0.02% and 0.04% of the overall national landings of the sector during this period. The reporting of fishing positions is not specific, but generally reported according to reference positions for different areas (e.g. Doring Bay, Muisvlakte, Oubeep Bay and Stilbaai). It should be assumed that fishing could take place across the extent of all of the MRC areas. Page 11

16 Traditional linefish Catch (per year) Within MR area % of national ( ) 554MRC 512MRC 2.7 tons MRC 10025MRC 0 0 Cumulative (all four Mining Right area) 2.7 tons Figure 2.7: Spatial distribution of fishing effort expended by the South African tuna pole sector ( ) in relation to Alexkor s Marine Rights Concession Areas. Bathymetric contours are shown at 100m depth intervals from 100m to 1000m. Page 12

17 2.8 West coast rock lobster The West Coast rock lobster Jasus lalandii is a valuable resource of the South African West Coast and consequently an important income source for West Coast fishermen. Following the collapse of the rock-lobster resource in the early 1990s, fishing has been controlled by a Total Allowable Catch (TAC), a minimum size, restricted gear, a closed season and closed areas (Crawford et al. 1987, Melville-Smith et al. 1995). The fishery is divided into the offshore fishery (30 m to 100 m depth) and the near-shore fishery (< 30 m depth), thereby overlapping with the mining licence areas. Management of the resource is geographically specific, with the TAC annually allocated by Area. The mining licence areas fall within Management Area 1 of the commercial rock lobster fishing zones, which extends from the Orange River Mouth to Kleinzee. The fishery operates seasonally, with closed seasons applicable to different zones; Management Area 1 operates from 1 October to 30 April. Commercial catches of rock lobster in Area 1 are confined to shallower water (<30 m) with almost all the catch being taken in <15 m depth, therefore overlapping directly with diver-assisted vessel-based mining operations. Actual rock-lobster fishing, however, takes place only at discrete suitable reef areas along the shore within this broad depth zone. Lobster fishing is conducted from a fleet of small dinghies/bakkies. The majority of these work directly from the shore within a few nautical miles of the harbours, with only 30% of the total numbers of bakkies partaking in the fishery being deployed from larger deck boats. As a result, lobster fishing tends to be concentrated close to the shore within a few nautical miles of Port Nolloth and Hondeklip Bay. Landings of rock lobster recorded within Area 1 (Port Nolloth) have been reported at an average total rock lobster weight of 14.1 tons per year ( ). All landings were reported by bakkies, with no landings made by the offshore sector. This amounts to 3.2% of the total landings recorded by the nearshore West Coast rock lobster sector. The TACs and landings of rock lobster from Area 1 (Port Nolloth) for both the nearshore and offshore sectors combined are provided in Table 2. Figure 2.8 and Figure 2.9 show a summary of the overall national catch and effort data by fishing season and month, respectively. Table 2: Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Actual landed catch (kgs) for Area 1 in the Northern Cape during the 2006 to 2017 fishing seasons (Data source: Rock Lobster Section, DAFF). Sector TAC Area * * Data incomplete Refer to Figure 2.10 for the spatial distribution of west coast rock lobster catch ( ) which is shown up to a depth of 50 m, landed by the nearshore sector in relation to the MRC areas. However, fishing is directed at particular reef locations, as indicated in Figure Page 13

18 Catch (tons) Effort (No. of traps hauled) Bakkies Trapboats No. of traps Figure 2.8: Graph showing national catch recorded by the west coast rock lobster sectors for the period 2006 to Annual effort expenditure is indicated as the number of traps hauled Catch (kg) Effort (No. of traps hauled) Bakkie Trapboats No. of traps pulled 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 Figure 2.9: Graph showing average monthly catch (kg) and effort (number of traps hauled) reported by the trapboat and bakkie sectors for west coast rock lobster over the period 2006 to West coast rock lobster (nearshore sector) Catch (per year) Effort (per year) Within MR area ( ) % of national Within MR area ( ) % of national 554MRC 14.1 tons traps MRC MRC MRC Cumulative (all four Mining Right area) 14.1 tons traps 9.8 Page 14

19 Figure 2.10: Average catch per season (tons whole weight) of Jasus lalandii recorded by the nearshore (bakkie) sector for the years 2006 to 2016 in relation to Alexkor s Mining Rights Concession areas 554, 512, 513 and Green stars indicate the approximate position of targeted reefs. Page 15

20 2.9 Abalone ranching The Abalone Haliotus midae, is endemic to South Africa. The natural population extends along 1500 km of coastline east from St Helena Bay in the Western Cape to Port St Johns on the east coast (Branch et al. 2010; Troell et al 2006). Translocation of abalone occurs along roughly 50 km of the Namaqualand coast in the Northern Cape due to the seeding of areas using cultured spat specifically for seeding of abalone in designated areas (ranching) (Anchor Environmental, 2012). The potential to increase this to seeded area to 175 km has been made possible through the issuing of Abalone Ranching Rights (Government Gazette, 20 August 2010 No. 729) in four concession zones for abalone ranching between Alexander Bay and Hondeklipbaai (Diamond Coast Abalone 2016). H. midae inhabits intertidal and subtidal rocky reefs, with the highest densities found in kelp forests (Branch et al., 2010). Kelp forests are a key habitat for abalone, as they provide a key food source for abalone as well as an ideal ecosystem for abalone s life cycle (Branch et al., 2010). Light is a limiting factor for kelp beds, which are therefore limited to depths of 10m on the Namaqualand coast (Anchor Environmental, 2012). Habitat preferences changes as abalone develop. Larvae settle on encrusted coralline substrate and feed on benthic diatoms and bacteria (Shepherd and Turner, 1985). Juveniles of 3-10 mm are almost entirely dependent on sea urchins for their survival, beneath which they conceal themselves from predators such as the West Coast rock lobster (Sweijd, 2008; Tarr et al., 1996). Juveniles may remain under sea urchins until they reach mm in size, after which they move to rocky crevices in the reef. Adult abalone remains concealed in crevices, emerging nocturnally to feed on kelp fronds and red algae (Branch et al., 2010). In the wild, abalone may take 30 years to reach full size of 200 mm, but farmed abalone attain 100 mm in only 5 years, which is the maximum harvest size (Sales & Britz, 2001). South Africa is the largest producer of abalone outside of Asia (Troell et al., 2006). For example, in 2001, 12 abalone farms existed, generating US$12 million at volumes of tons per annum (Sales & Britz, 2001). By 2006, this number had almost doubled, with 22 permits granted and 5 more being scheduled for development (Troell et al., 2006). Until recently, abalone cultivation has been primarily onshore, but abalone ranching provides more cost effective opportunities for production (Anchor Environmental, 2012). Abalone ranching is where hatchery-produced seed are stocked into kelp beds outside the natural distribution (Troell et al., 2006). Abalone ranching was pioneered by Port Nolloth Sea Farms who were experimentally seeding kelp beds in Port Nolloth by Abalone ranching expanded in the area in 2013 when DAFF issued rights for each of four Concession Area Zones. Abalone ranching includes the spawning, larval development, seeding and harvest. An onshore hatchery supports the ranching in the adjacent sea (Anchor Environmental, 2012). Two hatcheries exist in Port Nolloth producing up to spat. To date, there has been no seeding in Zones 1 or 2. Seeding has taken place in Zones 3 and % of Zone 1 coincides with 554MRC and 75% of Zone 2 coincides with 512MRC. Uncertainty relating to user conflicts in Zones 1 and 2 has contributed to delays in seeding activities within these areas (G. le Roux, pers comm.). Intertidal mining presents a number of opportunities for introducing sediment into coastal ecosystems. Accretion, berm construction and dissolution and fines may all contain sand, silt and clay, the dispersion of which through wave actions and currents may increase water turbidity and influence marine ecosystems (Speybroek et al., 2004; Greene, 2002). Sediment plumes may become trapped in the surf zone, being transported alongshore with relatively little dilution. The higher the proportion of fine material, the more persistent such plumes are likely to be. Alternatively, undertows and rip currents could carry sediment beyond the surf zone, re-depositing it alongshore during calm conditions. Modelling has suggested however that it is likely to be rapidly distributed alongshore in a predominantly southerly direction by wave-driven currents, ultimately extending seawards beyond the bay mouth (WSP, 2015). Sediment as a result of dredging, berm construction etc. that settle at depths shallower than 90 m from the disturbance may become re-suspended by wave action (Smith & Mocke, 2002; Lane & Carter, 1999). Current velocities typical of the Benguela are also capable of resuspending sediment and transporting it northwards, and sediment that remains suspended for longer Page 16

21 durations would be entrained with the slower southerly undercurrents (Rogers & Bremner, 1991; Shillington et al., 1990). Mining through the accretion of sandy beaches and the construction of berms will inevitably have severely negative effects on the benthic community in adjacent intertidal and subtidal habitats, either through disturbing, or by eliminating habitats (Pulfrich, 2016). The immediate impact of beach accretion and berm construction is the burial of benthos beneath quarried sands and sediments as well as the complete destruction of benthos within the mined area. While these effects are localised, the dispersal of sediment may have further reaching effects on benthic species in the surrounding environment (Pulfrich, 2016) 2. Figure 2.11: Location of abalone ranching concession areas in relation to Alexkor s Mining Rights Concession areas 554, 512, 513 and This would include settlement of abalone as well as any seeded abalone Page 17

22 Abalone ranching Spatial overlap Length of coastline within MR area % of abalone ranching zone 554MRC ~60 km 100% (Zone 1) 10025MRC MRC ~24 km 75% (Zone 2) 513MRC 0 0 Cumulative (all four Mining Right area) N/a N/a 2.10 Small-scale fisheries Small-scale fishers using traditional fishing gear have historically harvested marine resources along the coastline of South Africa for consumptive use, livelihoods, and medicinal purpose. However, this group of people was not recognised in terms of the Marine Living Resources Act and were further marginalised through commercial fishing rights allocation processes. In 2007 government was compelled to redress the inequality suffered by the small scale fishers by means of an order from the Equality Court. Through extensive consultative processes the small-scale fisheries policy was finalised in 2012 with the implementation plan approved in The small-scale fishery policy implementation plan was initiated in 2016 (DAFF 2016). Small-scale fishers fish to meet food and basic livelihood needs, and may be directly involved in harvesting, processing and distribution of fish for commercial purposes. These fishers traditionally operate on near shore fishing grounds, using traditional low technology or passive fishing gear to harvest marine living resources on a full-time, part-time or seasonal basis. Fishing trips are usually a single day in duration and fishing/harvesting techniques are labour intensive. The equipment used by small-scale fishers includes rowing boats in some areas, motorized boats on the south and west coast and simple fishing gear including hands, feet, screw drivers, hand lines, prawn pumps, rods with reels, gaffs, hoop nets, gill nets, seine/trek nets and semi-permanently fixed kraal traps. Small-scale fishers are an integral part of the rural and coastal communities in which they reside and this is reflected in the socio-economic profile of such communities. In the Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal and the Northern Cape, small-scale fishers live predominantly in rural areas while those in the Western Cape live mainly in urban and peri-urban areas. Resources are managed in terms of a communitybased co-management approach that aims to ensure that harvesting and utilisation of the resource occurs in a sustainable manner in line with the ecosystems approach. The small-scale fisheries policy proposes that certain areas on the coast be prioritized and demarcated as small-scale fishing areas. In some areas access rights could be reserved exclusively for use by small-scale fishers. The community, once they are registered as a community-based legal entity, could apply for the demarcation of these areas and should conflict arise, it should be referred to conflict resolution under the Policy. The policy also requires a multi-species approach to allocating rights, which will entail allocation of rights for a basket of species that may be harvested or caught within particular designated areas. DAFF recommends five basket areas: 1. Basket Area A The Namibian border to Cape of Good Hope 57 different resources 2. Basket Area B Cape of Good Hope to Cape Infanta 109 different resources 3. Basket Area C Cape Infanta to Tsitsikamma 107 different resources 4. Basket Area D Tsitsikamma to the Pondoland MPA 138 different resources 5. Basket Area E Pondoland MPA to the Mozambican border 127 different resources. Alexkor s MRC areas fall within the area demarcated as Basket Area 1, within which Port Nolloth is the access point for participants in the small-scale fishing sector. Page 18

23 2.11 Beach-seine and gillnet fisheries There are a number of active beach-seine and gillnet operators throughout South Africa (collectively referred to as the netfish sector). Initial estimates indicate that there are at least fishermen active in fisheries using beach-seine and gillnets, mostly (86%) along the West and South coasts. These fishermen utilize registered and 458 illegal nets and report an average catch of about tons annually, constituting 60% harders (also known as mullet, Liza richardsonii), 10% St Joseph shark (Callorhinchus capensis) and 30% "bycatch" species such as galjoen (Dichistius capensis), yellowtail (Seriola lalandii) and white steenbras (Lithognathus lithognathus). Catch-perunit-effort declines eastwards from 294 and 115 kg net-day 1 for the beach-seine and gill-net fisheries respectively off the West Coast to 48 and 5 kg net-day 1 off KwaZulu-Natal. Consequently, the fishery changes in nature from a largely commercial venture on the West Coast to an artisanal/subsistence fishery on the East Coast (Lamberth et al. 1997). The fishery is managed on a Total Allowable Effort (TAE) basis with a fixed number of operators in each of 15 defined areas. The number of Rights Holders for 2014 was listed as 28 for beach-seine and 162 for gill-net (DAFF, 2014a). Figure 2.12 shows fishing areas and associated effort within these areas indicated as the number of right holders for both the beach-seine and gillnet sectors. 554MRC coincides with management area 3 (now referred to as area A), which is situated off Port Nolloth. Table 3 lists TAE by area for the 2016/17 season (DAFF). Figure 2.12: Beach-seine and gillnet fishing areas and TAE (DAFF, 2014). Page 19

24 The beach-seine fishery operates primarily on the West Coast of South Africa between False Bay and Port Nolloth (Lamberth 2006) with a few permit holders in KwaZulu-Natal targeting mixed shoaling fish during the annual winter migration of sardine (Fréon et al. 2010). Beach-seining is an active form of fishing in which woven nylon nets are rowed out into the surf zone to encircle a shoal of fish. They are then hauled shorewards by a crew of 6 30 persons, depending on the size of the net and length of the haul. Nets range in length from 120 m to 275 m. Fishing effort is coastal and net depth may not exceed 10 m (DAFF 2014b). Three of a total of 28 right holders operate within 554MRC. Since the onshore mining right area (i.e. 550MRC) has restricted access, effort can be expected to occur closer to Port Nolloth. The gillnet fishery operates from Yzerfontein to Port Nolloth on the West Coast. Surface-set gillnets (targeting mullet) are restricted in size to 75 m x 5 m and bottom-set gillnets (targeting St Joseph shark) are restricted to 75 m x 2.5 m (da Silva et al. 2015) and are set in waters shallower than 50 m. The spatial distribution of effort is represented as the annual number of nets per kilometre of coastline and ranges up to a maximum of 15 off St Helena Bay. Of a total of 162 right holders, four operate within 554MRC. The combined landings by the beach-seine and gillnet sectors in the vicinity of Port Nolloth amount to <10% of the national netfish landings. Table 3: Recommended Total Allowable Effort (TAE, number of rights and exemption holders) and rights allocated in for each netfish area. Levels of effort are designed to facilitate recovery of the harder stock and are based on the number of fishers who could maintain a viable income in each area (DAFF 2017). Area Locality Beachseine Gill/drift Total Rights allocated A Port Nolloth B Hondeklipbaai C Olifantsriviermond-Wadrifsoutpansmond D Wadrifsoutpansmond-Elandsbaai-Draaihoek E Draaihoek, (Rochepan)-Cape Columbine, including Paternoster F Saldhana Bay G Langebaan Lagoon H Yzerfontein I Bokpunt (Melkbos)-Milnerton J Houtbay beach K Longbeach-Scarborough L Smitswinkel Bay, Simonstown, Fishoek M Muizenberg-Strandfontein N Macassar* (1) OE Olifants River Estuary Netfish Catch (per year) Effort (No. of rights allocated) Within MR area (2016/17) % of national Within MR area (2016/17) % of national 554MRC - < MRC MRC MRC Cumulative (all four Mining Right area) - < Page 20

25 2.12 Seaweed The South African seaweed industry is based on the commercial collection of kelps (Ecklonia maxima and Laminaria pallida) and red seaweed (Gelidium spp.) as well as small quantities of several other species. The resource is exploited between the Orange and Mtamvuna Rivers (see Figure 2.13). In the Northern and Western Cape, the industry is currently based on the collection of beach-cast kelps and harvesting of fresh kelps. Beach-cast red seaweeds were collected in Saldanha Bay and St Helena Bay, but there has been no commercial activity there since Gelidium species are harvested in the Eastern Cape (DAFF, 2014a). The seaweed sector employs approximately people, approximately 92% of whom are historically disadvantaged persons. Much of the harvest is sun-dried, milled and exported for the extraction of alginate. Fresh kelp is also harvested in large quantities (about tons per annum) in the Western Cape as feed for farmed abalone. This resource, with a market value of about R6 million is critically important to local abalone farmers. Fresh kelp is also harvested for high-value plant-growth stimulants that are marketed locally and internationally. Annual yields of commercial seaweeds over the period are shown in Table 4. Harvesting rights are issued by management area. Whilst the Minister annually sets both a TAC and TAE for the sector, the principle management tool is effort control and the number of right holders in each seaweed harvesting area is restricted. Fourteen commercial seaweed harvesting rights are currently allocated and each concession area is limited to one right-holder for each functional group of seaweed (e.g. kelps, Gelidium spp. and Gracilarioids). In certain areas there are also limitations placed on the amounts that may be harvested. The South African coastline is divided between Port Nolloth and Port St Johns into 23 harvesting areas (see Table 5 for yield of kelp by area for the 2012/13 season). Table 4: Annual yields of commercial seaweeds in South Africa ( ). Kelp beach cast refers to material that is collected in a semi-dry state, whereas kelp fresh beach cast refers to clean, wet kelp fronds that, together with kelp fronds harvest, are supplied as abalone feed (DAFF). Year Gelidium (kg dry weight) Gracilarioids (kg dry weight) Kelp beach cast (kg dry weight) Kelp fronds harvest (kg fresh weight) Kelp fresh beach cast (kg fresh weight) Kelpak (kg fresh weight) Page 21

26 Table 5: Maximum sustainable yield of harvested kelp for all areas for the 2012 season (1 April March 2013). Area Number Whole kelp (t fresh weight) Kelp fronds (t fresh weight) Total MRC is not expected to coincide with the depth range at which divers could harvest kelp; however, MRC 554 coincides with seaweed management areas 19 and 16 and MRC 512 and 513 coincide with seaweed management area 18. Permit conditions stipulate that within these areas kelp may be harvested using a diver deployed from a boat or the shore. No kelp plants with a stipe less than 50 cm long may be cut or harmed. Beach cast plants may be collected by hand. Although companies have obtained rights to Area 19 in the past, they have not been used due to access restrictions related to mining rights (DAFF 2015). Seaweed Spatial Overlap 554MRC Length of coastline within MR area 76 km % of management area 100% of management areas 19 and MRC MRC 32 km 70% of management area MRC 32 km 70% of management area 18 Cumulative (all four Mining Right area) 108 km N/a Page 22

27 Figure 2.13: Location of seaweed rights areas in relation to Alexkor s Mining Rights Concession areas 554, 512, 513 and Page 23

28 3. References da Silva C, Booth AJ, Dudley SFJ, Kerwath SE, Lamberth SJ, Leslie RW, McCord ME, Sauer WHH & T Zweig The current status and management of South Africa's chondrichthyan fisheries, African Journal of Marine Science, 37:2, , DOI: / X DAFF Sector specific conditions: commercial linefishery. Fishing season: 2016/7. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cape Town. DAFF. 2016a. Implementation plan for the small-scale fisheries policy. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cape Town. DAFF. 2016b. Fishing industry handbook: South Africa, Namibia & Mozambique. George Warman Publications: 44 th Edition. DAFF Policy on the allocation of commercial fishing rights in the seaweed fishery. Government Gazette, 16 November 2015 No Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cape Town. DAFF. 2014a. Status of the South African marine fishery resources. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cape Town. DAFF. 2014b. Section C. Sector specific conditions: beach seine and gillnet fishery. Fishing season: Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cape Town. Fréon P, Coetzee JC, van der Lingen CD, Connell AD, O Donoghue SH, Roberts MJ et al A review and tests of hypotheses about causes of the KwaZulu-Natal sardine run. African Journal of Marine Science 32: Griffiths MH, Lamberth SJ Evaluating a marine recreational fishery in South Africa. In: Pitcher TJ, Hollingworth CE (eds), Recreational fisheries: ecological, economic and social evaluation. Oxford: Blackwell Science. pp Lamberth SJ White sharks and other chondrichthyan interactions with the beach-seine (treknet) fishery in False Bay, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 28: Lamberth SJ, Sauer, WHH, Mann BQ, Brouwer SL, Clark BM and C Erasmus The status of the South African beach-seine and gill-net fisheries. S. Afr. J. mar. Sci. 18: Page 24