Utilization of Screw Piles in High Seismicity Areas of Cold and Warm Permafrost

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Utilization of Screw Piles in High Seismicity Areas of Cold and Warm Permafrost"

Transcription

1 University of Arkansas Alaska University Transportation Center Utilization of Screw Piles in High Seismicity Areas of Cold and Warm Permafrost Prepared By: Dr. Kenan Hazirbaba Dr. Brady Cox Dr. Clinton Wood July 2 Prepared For: Alaska University Transportation Center Duckering Building Room 245 P.O. Box 7559 Fairbanks, AK The University of Arkansas Department of Civil Engineering BELL 49 Fayetteville, AR 727 INE/AUTC.2

2 Shear Wave Velocity Profiling in High Seismicity Areas of Cold and Warm Permafrost a study performed in conjunction with the project Utilization of Screw Piles in High Seismicity Areas of Cold and Warm Permafrost PI: Dr. Kenan Hazirbaba for: Alaska University Transportation Center prepared by: Brady R. Cox, Ph.D. P.E. Assistant Professor The University of Arkansas Department of Civil Engineering BELL 49, Fayetteville, AR 727 Office: BELL 455A brcox@uark.edu Phone: (479) Fax: (479) Clinton M. Wood, EIT Gradute Research Assistant The University of Arkansas Department of Civil Engineering BELL 49, Fayetteville, AR 727 Office: ERC 23 cmwood@uark.edu Phone: (479) Fax: (479) July 22, 2

3 Table of Contents. Introduction Overview of SASW Test Method Field Equipment and Testing Procedures Data Reduction and Forward Modeling Procedures Site Locations and Selected Site Results Summary References

4 . Introduction This work was performed in support of the AUTC project Utilization of Screw Piles in High Seismicity Areas of Cold and Warm Permafrost under the direction of PI Dr. Kenan Hazirbaba. Surface wave testing was performed at 3 sites in the City of Fairbanks, AK from August 9-3, 9 by personnel from the University of Arkansas. The goal of the testing was to develop shear wave velocity profiles at selected research sites and at various areas of cold and warm permafrost. The shear wave velocity profiles provide a key parameter in determining the dynamic response of piles and soil-pile interaction under dynamic loading. The Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) method (Stokoe et al., 994) was used to determine shear wave velocity profile at each site to a depth of between 3 and 6 meters. 2. Overview of the SASW Test Method The SASW test method is a nondestructive and nonintrusive seismic method that utilizes the dispersive nature of Rayleigh-type surface waves propagating through a layered media to determine the shear wave velocity profile of the material (Stokoe et al., 994). Dispersion in surface wave velocity arises from changing stiffness properties of the soil and rock layers with depth, which caused the velocity to vary with wavelength or frequency. This phenomenon is illustrated in Figure for a multi-layered solid. A high-frequency surface wave, which propagates with a short wavelength, only stresses material near the exposed surface and thus only samples the properties of the shallow, near-surface material (Figure b). A lower-frequency surface wave, which has a longer wavelength, stresses material to a greater depth and thus samples the properties of the shallower and deeper materials (Figure c). Spectral analysis is used to separate the waves by frequency and wavelength to determine the experimental ("field") dispersion curve for the site. An analytical, forward-modeling procedure is then used to theoretically match the field dispersion curve with a one-dimensional layered system of varying layer stiffnesses and thicknesses (Joh, 996). The one-dimensional shear wave velocity profile that generates a dispersion curve that most closely matches the field dispersion curve is presented as the shear wave velocity profile at the site. 3

5 Air Layer Layer 2 2 Vertical Particle Motion Vertical Particle Motion 2 Layer 3 a. Material Profile Depth Depth b. Shorter c. Longer Wavelength, Wavelength, 2 Figure Illustration of Surface Waves with Different Wavelengths Sampling Different Materials in a Layered System which Results in Dispersion in Wave Velocities. 3. Field Equipment and Testing Procedures SASW testing in the field involves generating surface waves at one point on the exposed material surface and measuring the motions perpendicular to the surface created by the passage of surface waves past two or more measurement points. All measurement points are arranged on the exposed surface along a single radial path from the source. Successively longer spacings between the receivers and between the source and first receiver are used to measure progressively longer and longer wavelengths. This general testing configuration for one source/receiver set-up is illustrated in Figure 2. In this example, three receivers are used at each source/receiver set-up. This arrangement enables two sets of SASW test results to be obtained at the same time. The middle receiver (receiver #2) is located at the center line of the test array at all times. When different spacings are used and/or reverse directions are tested, only receivers # and #3 and the source are moved. Distances between receivers of.5 to 8 meters are typically used to profile to depths of about 3 to 6 m (larger spacings have been used with specialized vibroseis trucks to profile to depths of m). This number and progression of receiver spacings results in significant overlapping of the individual dispersion curves used to develop a composite field curve, thereby enhancing the test reliability and confirming global lateral uniformity over the test array. 4

6 C L (Source: Sledge Hammer or Vibroseis Truck) Receivers a. Forward: # #2 #3 X X Receivers 2X Source b. Reverse: #3 #2 # 2X X X Figure 2 Common-Middle-Receiver Geometry Used in SASW Testing With Three Receivers. Regardless of the spacing between receivers, at no point in the data analyses are wavelengths considered that are longer than twice the distance between the source and the first receiver in the receiver pair. This geometry results in minimizing near-field effects while simultaneously recording long wavelengths. For the testing in Fairbanks, typical spacings consisted of.6,.2, 2.4, 4.8, 7.6, 5.2, 3.5, 6. meters. A 4.5 kg sledgehammer was used as the surface wave source for spacings less than 7 meters to develop high frequency waves for near surface characterization. Both a forward and reverse receiver orientation was used with spacings less than 7 meters to improve data quality and account for variability in the soil and phase differences in receivers. For receiver spacings greater than 7 meters, a vibroseis source owned and operated by the University of Arkansas was used. Figure 3 is a photograph of this vibroseis truck, called The Hawg. The Hawg is capable of operating at frequencies between 2 Hz. However, its optimal frequency range is between Hz, where it can produce up to lbs of peak dynamic force ( lbs peak-to-peak). The use of the vibroseis truck significantly increased the depth of investigation at each site. Only a forward receiver orientation was used with the vibroseis truck due to position limitations. 5

7 Figure 3 Photograph of The Hawg vibroseis truck owned and operated by the University of Arkansas. Geospace model GS-D transducers, which have a natural frequency of 4.5 Hz, were used for spacing less than 7 meters, whereas Mark products Model L-4C transducers, which have a natural frequency of Hz, were used for longer spacings. These receivers are one-dimensional transducers that only measure vertical particle motion. The key points with regard to these receivers are that: () they have significant output over the measurement frequency range, (2) they are matched so that any differences in phase are negligible over the measurement frequency range, (3) they are coupled well to the soil or rock, and (4) the coupling is similar for each receiver. 4. Data Reduction and Forward Modeling Procedures In SASW testing, data is collected in the field in the form of phase plots and coherence function between individual receiver pairs. That data is reduced and interpreted using the program WinSASW, developed by Dr. Sung Ho Joh at the University of Texas at Austin (Joh, 996). Data Reduction consists of the following steps. For each receiver pair, the phase plot and 6

8 coherence function are loaded into WinSASW. A masking procedure is then performed to manually eliminate portions of the data with poor signal quality or portions of the data contaminated by the near-field waveform component. Figure 4 shows a typically phase and coherence plot from the 7.6 m spacing at Site 8 CRREL Array #2. The phase plots are unwrapped using the program and the surface wave phase velocity at each frequency is calculated using Equation below: V R f 36 x () where V R is the phase velocity in ft/sec or m/s, f is the frequency in Hertz (cycles per sec), is the phase angle in degrees (at frequency f), and x is the distance between the receivers in the same length units as used to represent V R. This process is repeated for each receiver spacing to develop a composite dispersion curve over the frequency/wavelength range of interest. The next data reduction step is to match a theoretical dispersion curve to the experimental dispersion curve measured in the field. The theoretical dispersion curve is generated based on a system of horizontal soil layers with various shear wave velocities, thicknesses, densities, and Poisson s ratios. Through an iterative process the properties of the layered system are changed to produce a match to the experimental dispersion curve. WinSASW, through an effective 3D solution, accounts for the multiple modes of surface wave propagation and all body waves produced by the source. In the analysis, the final shear wave velocity profile is presented to a depth equal to.5 times the maximum wavelength in the experimental dispersion curve. A typical experimental dispersion curve with theoretical match from Site 8 CRREL Array #2 is shown in Figure 5, and the associated shear wave velocity profile is shown in Figure Site Locations and Selected Site Results Thirty locations in the City of Fairbanks, AK were tested to obtain 43 separate shear wave velocity profiles. The sites were chosen based on a grid pattern and the local availability of a parking lot or road large enough to complete the testing. Locations of all 3 sites across the city are shown in Figure 7. The exact site locations (coordinates) and seismic site classification according to IBC (9), ASCE/SEI 7-5 and FEMA 4 for each test location are provided in 7

9 a. Cross Power Specturm b. Coherence Function Figure 4 Phase and coherence plot measured of the 7.6 m spacing during SASW testing at Site 8 CRREL Array #2. Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 5 Experimental and theoricatical dispersion curve for Array #2 at Site 8 (CRREL).. 8

10 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) Depth (m) 8 25 max /2 3 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 6 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #2 at Site 8 (CRREL). Table. Site classification for seismic design is preferably based on shear wave velocity measurements of the upper 3 m of the site subsurface profile. The site classification is useful for the design of structures in seismically active areas and useful for assessing the overall stiffness of a site. The majority of sites across the city classify as Site Class D (stiff soil), however several sites were stiff enough to classify as Site Class C (very dense soil and soft rock). There was no apparent pattern between the location of Site Class C and D locations; however sites/profiles with an undisturbed surface layer (e.g. Site #5 Bunnel) tended to have higher average velocities than sites/profiles with an improved surface layer. This is likely due to the loss of the surface insulation layer and warming of the permafrost layer. Several sites (7, 8, 2, 23, and 29) had large variations in the dispersion curve likely caused by lateral variability at the site. These variations in dispersion data lead to multiple interpretations of the experimental dispersion curve resulting in multiple shear wave velocity profiles at the site. The specific results for all test locations can be found in Appendix A. The results from the three primary test sites are discussed below. 9

11 Figure 7 SASW Site Locations (Fairbanks, AK) courtesy of Google Earth.

12 Table SASW site locations and seismic site classifications Site # Site Name Latitude Longitude Vs3 (m/s) Site Class Alaska Club N W D 2 Army Rd N W D 3 Auto Service Company N W D 4 Big Dipper Ice Arena N W C 5 Bunnel # N W D 5 Bunnel #2 N W C 5 Bunnel #3 N W C 6 CCHRC # N W C 6 CCHRC #2 N W D 6 CCHRC #3 N W D 6 CCHRC #4 N W D 6 CCHRC #5 N W C 7 Creamer Field N W D 8 CRREL # N W D 8 CRREL #2 N W D 8 CRREL #3 N W D 8 CRREL #4 N W D 9 Cushman St & 7th Ave N W D Fairbanks Airport N W D Fairbanks Chevy N W D 2 Frank Ave N W D 3 Home Depot N W C 4 Iniakuk Ave N W D 5 King Rd N W D 6 Lathrop High School N W D 7 Mail Trail Rd N W D 8 Monroe Catholic School N W D 9 North Peger Rd N W D 2 Old Pioneer Way N W D 2 Pioneer Park N W D 22 Sadlers N W D 23 Sams Club N W C-D 2 24 Sears N W D 25 Shell St N W D 26 Tanana Middle School N W D 27 UAF Farm N W D 28 West Valley High School N W D 29 WRRC # N W C-D 2 29 WRRC #2 N W C-D 2 29 WRRC #3 N W C 29 WRRC #4 N W D 29 WRRC #5 N W D 3 Zion Lutheran Church N W D Notes: ) Sites classified according to IBC 9. 2) C-D sites classifications are a result of lateral variability.

13 Three primary sites (#5 Bunnel, #6 CCHRC, and #8 CRREL) were investigated using multiple array locations to assess site variability for further project applications. Three separate array locations were used at Site #5 Bunnel. The Bunnel site map is shown in Figure 8. The arrays were positioned to provide a large coverage area without leaving the road. Array # is located directly on a gravel embankment and Arrays #2 and #3 are located to the right and left respectfully. The shear wave velocity profiles for each array location are shown in Figure 9. On initial inspection it is apparent Profiles 2 and 3 are stiffer than Profile and encounter the stiffer layers at shallower depths. Profiles 2 and 3 have an increase in stiffness at approximately 4 meters while Profile doesn t show that increase until 8 meters. Next, Profiles 2 and 3 encounter a high velocity layer, likely permafrost at a depth of 8 and 3 m. The layer is not seen on profile until a depth of 2m. Moreover, the velocity in Profile is 2 ft/sec lower, indicating a somewhat softer layer. Overall, the road seems to have a significant effect on the shear wave velocity compared to the unimproved areas of the site. Site #6 is located at the Cold Climate Housing Research Center (CCHRC). Surface wave array locations are shown in Figure. Array locations #, #2, and #3 are located on the gravel road with #3 being the closest to the research facility. Array location #4 is just north of the road and array location #5 is far south of the road in the forested area. The shear wave velocity profiles for each array location are shown in Figure. Profile is the stiffest of the five profiles with higher velocities at shallower depths than the other profiles. This does not fit the trend seen at the Bunnel Site, however Profile has undeveloped forested areas on both sides, which may influence the permafrost layer. Profiles 2 and 5 are very similar, with Profile 5 being slightly stiffer. This difference is likely caused by Profile 5 being further into the forested area than Profile 2. Profile 4 is the softest profile, which is different than the trend seen at the Bunnel Site; however, this area may have been modified when the building was constructed. Profile 3 has very similar shear wave velocities to Profiles 2 and 5, however Profile 3 encounters the final stiff layer almost m deeper than Profiles 2 and 5. The layering difference may be caused by the proximity of Profile 3 to the building. Overall, Site #6 CCHRC has significant variability across the site, with variable layer thickness and wide ranging shear wave velocities. The Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) is the location of Site #8. Array locations #, #2, and #3 are located on the west edge of the property near the pile 2

14 testing arrangement (Figure 2). Array location #4 is further north and on the east edge of the property. The shear wave velocities for each location are shown in Figure 3. It is clear that the different array locations have very similar profiles. All the profiles encounter a stiffer layer at approximately 6 m deep. The layer is likely lightly frozen permafrost and the depth, thickness, and stiffness of the permafrost layers is very uniform across the site with increasing stiffness with depth. Overall, Site #8 CRREL is a very uniform site with well defined layers. 6. Summary SASW surface wave testing was performed at 3 sites in the City of Fairbanks, AK. The majority of sites in the Fairbanks area classify as Site Class D according to IBC (9), however several sites had stiff subsurface layers that improved the Site Class to C. The three primary tests sites were located across Fairbanks and presented somewhat different subsurface stratification. Site #5 Bunnel showed some variability in the subsurface across the site. The array located on the road was significantly softer versus the off-road arrays. Overall, Bunnel had a very stiff subsurface profile with little variability once off the main road. Site # 6 CCHRC had the most variability with profiles varying considerably between array locations. The subsurface stiffness was similar to the Bunnel site, although a little softer, especially Profile #4. Site #8 CRREL had the most uniform subsurface across the site with only small differences between layer thicknesses. However, Bunnel and CCHRC had between 25% and % higher velocity than seen at the CRREL site. This is likely caused by a softening of the permafrost layer or a softer more weathered bedrock layer below the site. By and large, with 3 separate sites tested across the city of Fairbanks a good grid pattern has been established for future seismic/engineering work. 7. References Joh, S.-H. (996), Advances in the Data Interpretation Technique for Spectral- Analysis-of- Surface-Waves (SASW) Measurements, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 24 pgs. Stokoe, K.H., II, Wright, S.G., Bay, J.A., and Roesset, J.M., 994. Characterization of geotechnical sites by SASW method, in Technical Report - Geophysical Characterization of Sites, Woods, R.D. (editor), ISSMFE Technical Committee : Oxford Publishers, 3th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, India. 3

15 Figure 8 SASW array location map for Site 5 (Bunnel). 4

16 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) Profile Profile 2 Profile 3 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 9 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 5 (Bunnel). 5

17 Figure SASW Array location map for Site 6 (CCHRC). 6

18 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) Profile Profile 2 Profile 3 Profile 4 Profile Depth (m) 6 3 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 6 (CCHRC). 7

19 Figure 2 SASW Array location map for Site 8 (CRREL). 8

20 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 4 Depth (ft) 6 8 Profile Profile 2 Profile 3 Profile 4 2 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 3 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 8 (CRREL). 9

21 Appendix A 2

22 Site : Alaska Club Figure SASW Array location map for Site (Alaska Club). 2

23 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) 2 Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 2 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site (Alaska Club). 22

24 Table Final forward modeling soil profile for Site (Alaska Club). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 27 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 4 Depth (m) 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 3 Shear wave velocity profile for Site (Alaska Club) 23

25 Site 2: Army Road Figure 4 SASW Array location map for Site 2 (Army Road). 24

26 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) 2 Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 5 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 2 (Army Road). 25

27 Table 2 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 2 (Army Road). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 326 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) 4 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 6 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 2 (Army Road). 26

28 Site 3: Auto Service Company Figure 7 SASW Array location map for Site 3 (Auto Service Company). 27

29 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 8 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 3 (Auto Service Company). 28

30 Table 3 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 3 (Auto Service Company). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 256 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) 4 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 9 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 3 (Auto Service Company). 29

31 Site 4: Big Dipper Ice Arena Figure SASW Array location map for Site 4 (Big Dipper Ice Arena). 3

32 Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 4 (Big Dipper Ice Arena). 3

33 Table 4 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 4 (Big Dipper Ice Arena). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) C Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 4 Depth (ft) Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 2 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 4 (Big Dipper Ice Arena). 32

34 Site 5: Bunnel Figure 3 SASW Array location map for Site 5 (Bunnel). 33

35 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) 2 Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 4 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array # at Site 5 (Bunnel). 34

36 Table 5 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array # at Site 5 (Bunnel). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Vs 3 (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 366 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 5 Shear wave velocity profile for Array # at Site 5 (Bunnel). 35

37 Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 6 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #2 at Site 5 (Bunnel). 36

38 Table 6 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #2 at Site 5 (Bunnel). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Vs 3 (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 5 C Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 8 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 7 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #2 at Site 5 (Bunnel). 37

39 Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 8 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #3 at Site 5 (Bunnel). 38

40 Table 7 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #3 at Site 5 (Bunnel). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Vs 3 (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 393 C Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 9 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #3 at Site 5 (Bunnel). 39

41 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Profile Profile 2 Profile Depth (ft) 3 8 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 2 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 5, -ft. (Bunnel). 4

42 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) Profile Profile 2 Profile 3 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 2 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 5 (Bunnel). 4

43 Site #6 CCHRC Figure 22 SASW Array location map for Site 6 (CCHRC). 42

44 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) 3 Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 23 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array # at Site 6 (CCHRC). 43

45 Table 8 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array # at Site 6 (CCHRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 564 C Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 4 Depth (m) 6 3 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 24 Shear wave velocity profile for Array # at Site 6 (CCHRC). 44

46 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 25 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #2 at Site 6 (CCHRC). 45

47 Table 9 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #2 at Site 6 (CCHRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 367 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 6 2 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 26 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #2 at Site 6 (CCHRC). 46

48 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 27 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #3 at Site 6 (CCHRC). 47

49 Table Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #3 at Site 5 (CCHRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 36 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 8 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 28 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #3 at Site 6 (CCHRC). 48

50 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 29 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #4 at Site 6 (CCHRC). 49

51 Table Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #4 at Site 6 (CCHRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 327 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 8 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 2 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #4 at Site 6 (CCHRC).

52 Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 3 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #5 at Site 6 (CCHRC). 5

53 Table 2 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #5 at Site 6 (CCHRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 449 C Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) 4 3 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 32 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #5 at Site 6 (CCHRC). 52

54 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Profile Profile 2 Profile 3 Profile 4 Profile Depth (ft) 3 8 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 33 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 6, -ft. (CCHRC). 53

55 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) Profile Profile 2 Profile 3 Profile 4 Profile Depth (m) 6 3 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 34 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 6 (CCHRC). 54

56 Site 7: Creamer Field Figure 35 SASW Array location map for Site 7 (Creamer Field). 55

57 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 36 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 7 (Creamer Field). 56

58 Table 3 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 7 (Creamer Field). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 39 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 37 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 7 (Creamer Field). 57

59 Site 8: CRREL Figure 38 SASW Array location map for Site 8 (CRREL). 58

60 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 39 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array # at Site 8 (CRREL). 59

61 Table 4 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array # at Site 8 (CRREL). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 266 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 6 2 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 4 Shear wave velocity profile for Array # at Site 8 (CRREL). 6

62 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 4 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #2 at Site 8 (CRREL). 6

63 Table 5 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #2 at Site 8 (CRREL). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 296 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 42 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #2 at Site 8 (CRREL). 62

64 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 43 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #3 at Site 8 (CRREL). 63

65 Table 6 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #3 at Site 8 (CRREL). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 28 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 44 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #3 at Site 8 (CRREL). 64

66 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 45 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #4 at Site 8 (CRREL). 65

67 Table 7 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #4 at Site 8 (CRREL). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 3 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 8 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 46 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #4 at Site 8 (CRREL). 66

68 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 4 Depth (ft) 2 3 Profile Profile 2 Profile 3 Profile Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 47 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 8, -ft. (CRREL). 67

69 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 4 Depth (ft) 6 8 Profile Profile 2 Profile 3 Profile 4 2 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 48 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 8 (CRREL). 68

70 Site 9: Cushman & 7 th Avenue Figure 49 SASW Array location map for Site 9 (Cushman & 7 th Avenue). 69

71 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 9 (Cushman & 7 th Avenue). 7

72 Table 8 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 9 (Cushman & 7 th Avenue). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 325 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) 4 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 5 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 9 (Cushman & 7 th Avenue). 7

73 Site : Fairbanks Airport Figure 52 SASW Array location map for Site (Fairbanks Airport). 72

74 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 53 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site (Fairbanks Airport). 73

75 Table 9 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site (Fairbanks Airport). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 295 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) 4 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 54 Shear wave velocity profile for Site (Fairbanks Airport). 74

76 Site : Fairbanks Chevy Figure 55 SASW Array location map for Site (Fairbanks Chevy). 75

77 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Wavelength (ft) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Figure 56 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site (Fairbanks Chevy). 76

78 Table 2 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site (Fairbanks Chevy). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 323 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 4 Depth (m) 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 57 Shear wave velocity profile for Site (Fairbanks Chevy). 77

79 Site 2: Frank Avenue Figure 58 SASW Array location map for Site 2 (Frank Avenue). 78

80 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 59 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 2 (Frank Avenue). 79

81 Table 2 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 2 (Frank Avenue). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 334 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 6 2 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 6 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 2 (Frank Avenue). 8

82 Site 3: Home Depot Figure 6 SASW Array location map for Site 3 (Home Depot). 8

83 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 62 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 3 (Home Depot). 82

84 Table 22 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 3 (Home Depot). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 383 C Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 63 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 3 (Home Depot). 83

85 Site 4: Iniakuk Avenue Figure 64 SASW Array location map for Site 4 (Iniakuk Avenue). 84

86 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 65 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 4 (Iniakuk Avenue). 85

87 Table 23 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 4 (Iniakuk Avenue). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) D Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 3 4 Depth (m) 6 2 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 66 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 4 (Iniakuk Avenue). 86

88 Site 5: King Road Figure 67 SASW Array location map for Site 5 (King Road). 87

89 Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 68 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 5 (King Road). 88

90 Table 24 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 5 (King Road). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 326 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 69 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 5 (King Road). 89

91 Site 6: Lathrop High School Figure 7 SASW Array location map for Site 6 (Lathrop High School). 9

92 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 7 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 6 (Lathrop High School). 9

93 Table 25 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 6 (Lathrop High School). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 297 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 72 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 6 (Lathrop High School). 92

94 Site 7:Mail Trail Road Figure 73 SASW Array location map for Site 7 (Mail Trail Road). 93

95 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Upper Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Lower Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 74 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 7 (Mail Trail Road). Table 26 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 7, Upper Bound (Mail Trail Road). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 328 D 94

96 Table 27 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 7, Lower Bound (Mail Trail Road). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 279 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 Depth (ft) Upper Bound Lower Bound 2 3 Depth (m) 4 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) 95

97 Figure 75 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 7 (Mail Trail Road). Site 8: Monroe Catholic School Figure 76 SASW Array location map for Site 8 (Monroe Catholic School). 96

98 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Upper Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Lower Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 77 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 8 (Monroe Catholic School). Table 28 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 8, Upper Bound (Monroe Catholic School). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two D

99 Table 29 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 8, Lower Bound (Monroe Catholic School). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 28 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Upper Bound Lower Bound Depth (ft) Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) 98

100 Figure 78 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 8 (Monroe Catholic School). Site 9: North Peger Road Figure 79 SASW Array location map for Site 9 (North Peger Road). 99

101 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 8 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 9 (North Peger Road).

102 Table 3 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 9 (North Peger Road). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 244 D

103 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 4 Depth (m) 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 8 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 9 (North Peger Road). Site 2: Old Pioneer Way 2

104 Figure 82 SASW Array location map for Site 2 (Old Pioneer Way). 3

105 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 83 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 2 (Old Pioneer Way). 4

106 Table 3 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 2 (Old Pioneer Way). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 32 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 84 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 2 (Old Pioneer Way). 5

107 Site 2: Pioneer Park Figure 85 SASW Array location map for Site 2 (Pioneer Park). 6

108 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Upper Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Lower Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 86 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 2 (Pioneer Park). Table 3 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 2 Upper Bound (Pioneer Park). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 39 D 7

109 Table 32 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 2 Lower Bound (Pioneer Park). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 276 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 Upper Bound Lower Bound 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) 4 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 87 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 2 (Pioneer Park). 8

110 Site 22: Sadlers Figure 88 SASW Array location map for Site 22 (Sadlers). 9

111 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 89 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 22 (Sadlers).

112 Table 33 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 22 (Sadlers). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 263 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 9 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 22 (Sadlers).

113 Site 23: Sam s Club Figure 9 SASW Array location map for Site 23 (Sam s Club). 2

114 Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 92 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 23 Interpretation (Sam s Club). 3

115 Table 34 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 23 Interpretation (Sam s Club). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 454 C Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) 4 3 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 93 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 23, Interpretation (Sam s Club). 4

116 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) 2 Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 94 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 23 Interpretation 2 (Sam s Club). 5

117 Table 35 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 23 Interpretation 2 (Sam s Club). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 354 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 95 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 23 Interpretation 2 (Sam s Club). 6

118 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) Interpretation Interpretation 2 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 96 Comparison of shear wave velocity profiles at Site 23 (Sam s Club) 7

119 Site 24: Sears Figure 97 SASW Array location map for Site 24 (Sears). 8

120 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 98 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 24 (Sears). 9

121 Table 36 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 24 (Sears). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 344 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 99 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 24 (Sears). 2

122 Site 25: Shell Street Figure SASW Array location map for Site 25 (Shell Street). 2

123 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 25 (Shell Street). 22

124 Table 37 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 25 (Shell Street). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 284 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) 4 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 2 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 25 (Shell Street). 23

125 Site 26: Tanana Middle School Figure 3 SASW Array location map for Site 26 (Tanana Middle School). 24

126 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 4 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 26 (Tanana Middle School). 25

127 Table 38 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 26 (Tanana Middle School). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 262 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) 26

128 Figure 5 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 26 (Tanana Middle School). Site 27: UAF Farm Figure 6 SASW Array location map for Site 27 (UAF Farm). 27

129 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve 7 3 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 7 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 27 (UAF Farm). 28

130 Table 39 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 27 (UAF Farm). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 32 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) 29

131 Figure 8 Shear wave velocity profile for Site 27 (UAF Farm). Site 28: WestValley High School Figure 9 SASW Array location map for Site 28 (West Valley High School). 3

132 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure Experimental and theoretical dispersion data at Site 28 (West Valley High School). 3

133 Table 4 Final forward modeling soil profile for Site 28 (West Valley High School). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 286 D 32

134 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) 3 4 Depth (m) 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure Shear wave velocity profile for Site 28 (West Valley High School). Site 29: WRRC (West Ridge Research Center) 33

135 Figure 2 SASW Array location map for Site 29 (WRRC). 34

136 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Upper Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Lower Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 3 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array # at Site 29 (WRRC). Table 4 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #, Site 29 Upper Bound (WRRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) C Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 35

137 Table 42 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #, Site 29 Lower Bound (WRRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 269 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 3 2 Depth (ft) Upper Bound Lower Bound 3 4 Depth (m) 6 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 4 Shear wave velocity profile for Array # at Site 29 (WRRC). 36

138 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Upper Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Lower Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 5 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #2 at Site 29 (WRRC). Table 43 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #2 Site 29 Upper Bound (WRRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) C Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 37

139 Table 44 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #2 Site 29 Lower Bound (WRRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) D Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Upper Bound Lower Bound 2 Depth (ft) 3 4 Depth (m) 6 3 Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 6 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #2 at Site 29 (WRRC). 38

140 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Upper Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Lower Bound Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 7 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #3 at Site 29 (WRRC). Table 45 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #3 Site 29 Upper Bound (WRRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 578 C 39

141 Table 46 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #3, Site 29 Lower Bound (WRRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 439 C Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) 3 8 Depth (m) 4 Upper Bound Lower Bound Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 8 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #3 at Site 29 (WRRC). 4

142 Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Wavelength (m) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 9 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #4 at Site 29 (WRRC). 4

143 Table 47 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #4 at Site 29 (WRRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 34 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Depth (ft) Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 2 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #4 at Site 29 (WRRC). 42

144 Wavelength (m) Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (ft/sec) Experimental Dispersion Curve Theoretical Dispersion Curve Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity (m/s) Wavelength (ft) Figure 2 Experimental and theoretical dispersion data for Array #5 at Site 29 (WRRC). 43

145 Table 48 Final forward modeling soil profile for Array #5 at Site 29 (WRRC). Layer Depth to P-wave Shear wave Poisson's Unit Vs 3 No. Thickness bottom velocity velocity Ratio Weight Site Class (m) (m) (m/s) (m/s) (kn/m^3) (m/s) Note: maximum depth of profile is approximately equal to maximum experimental wavelength/two. 34 D Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 22 Shear wave velocity profile for Array #5 at Site 29 (WRRC). 44

146 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) Upper Lower Bound Profile Upper Lower Bound Profile 2 Upper Lower Bound Profile 3 Prof ile 4 Prof ile Depth (ft) 2 6 Depth (m) Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 23 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 29, -4ft (WRRC). 45

147 Shear Wave Velocity (m/s) 2 Depth (ft) 3 4 Depth (m) Upper Lower Bound Profile Upper Lower Bound Profile 2 Upper Lower Bound Profile 3 Prof ile 4 Prof ile Shear Wave Velocity (ft/sec) Figure 24 Shear wave velocity profile comparison for Site 29 (WWRC). 46

148 Site 3: Zion Lutheran Church Figure 25 SASW Array location map for Site 3 (Zion Lutheran Church). 47

Lateral Load Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. ANDREW DAUMUELLER, PE, Ph.D.

Lateral Load Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. ANDREW DAUMUELLER, PE, Ph.D. Lateral Load Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction ANDREW DAUMUELLER, PE, Ph.D. Overview Introduction Methods commonly used to account for soil-structure interaction for static loads Depth to

More information

HRLA High-Resolution Laterolog Array Tool. Improving the accuracy of Rt

HRLA High-Resolution Laterolog Array Tool. Improving the accuracy of Rt HRLA High-Resolution Laterolog Array Tool Improving the accuracy of Rt Applications Resistivity determination in conductive mud systems Thin-bed evaluation Invasion characterization for permeability indication

More information

CENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No Sheet No. 1

CENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No Sheet No. 1 CENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No. 214030 Sheet No. 1 INTERIM REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED 66 KV GRID PLOT AT G-7, DWARKA, NEW DELHI. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description M/s.

More information

Effects of high-impedance-contrast boundary upon multi-modal seismic surface wave data

Effects of high-impedance-contrast boundary upon multi-modal seismic surface wave data UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 12-211 Effects of high-impedance-contrast boundary upon multi-modal seismic surface wave data Prajwol Tamrakar University of Nevada, Las Vegas

More information

Aalborg Universitet. Published in: Proceedings of Offshore Wind 2007 Conference & Exhibition. Publication date: 2007

Aalborg Universitet. Published in: Proceedings of Offshore Wind 2007 Conference & Exhibition. Publication date: 2007 Aalborg Universitet Design Loads on Platforms on Offshore wind Turbine Foundations with Respect to Vertical Wave Run-up Damsgaard, Mathilde L.; Gravesen, Helge; Andersen, Thomas Lykke Published in: Proceedings

More information

Quantitative Risk of Linear Infrastructure on Permafrost Heather Brooks, PE. Arquluk Committee Meeting November 2015

Quantitative Risk of Linear Infrastructure on Permafrost Heather Brooks, PE. Arquluk Committee Meeting November 2015 Slide 1 Quantitative Risk of Linear Infrastructure on Permafrost Heather Brooks, PE Arquluk Committee Meeting November 2015 Welcome to the meeting of the committee for Arquluk s Quantitative Risk of Linear

More information

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok 813 W. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: 907-269-3000 Fax: 907-269-3044 www.akenergyauthority.org SITE SUMMARY Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified:

More information

Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction

Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction Lecture 32 Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction Prof. G L Sivakumar Babu Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560012 Example calculation An 8 m high

More information

CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS

CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS CHAPTER 5: VACUUM TEST WITH VERTICAL DRAINS 5.1 Introduction Using surcharging as the sole soil consolidation mean can take a long time to reach the desired soil settlement. Soil consolidation using prefabricated

More information

Seismic Characterization of Wind Turbine Sites Near Lawton, Oklahoma, by the MASW Method

Seismic Characterization of Wind Turbine Sites Near Lawton, Oklahoma, by the MASW Method Seismic Characterization of Wind Turbine Sites Near Lawton, Oklahoma, by the MASW Method Choon B. Park and Richard D. Miller Kansas Geological Survey University of Kansas 1930 Constant Avenue Lawrence,

More information

Seismic Survey Designs for Converted Waves

Seismic Survey Designs for Converted Waves Seismic Survey Designs for Converted Waves James A. Musser* GMG/AXIS Inc., Denver, CO 1720 Red Cloud Road, Longmont, CO, 80501, USA jmusser@gmg.com ABSTRACT Designing converted wave 3D surveys is considerably

More information

Application of Expansive Soil Geotechnical Procedures

Application of Expansive Soil Geotechnical Procedures Application of Expansive Soil Geotechnical Procedures FPA PRESENTATION John T. Bryant, Ph.D., P.G., P.E with Robert L. Lytton, Ph.D., PE. And Mr. Dean Read HOUSTON, TEXAS WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 10, 2008 2008

More information

Pressuremeters in Geotechnical Design

Pressuremeters in Geotechnical Design Pressuremeters in Geotechnical Design B.G. CLARKE Department of Civil Engineering University of Newcastle upon Tyne BLACK1E ACADEMIC & PROFESSIONAL An Imprint of Chapman & Hall London Glasgow Weinheim

More information

Today: waves. Exam Results. Wave Motion. What is moving? Motion of a piece of the rope. Energy transport

Today: waves. Exam Results. Wave Motion. What is moving? Motion of a piece of the rope. Energy transport Exam: Exam scores posted on Learn@UW No homework due next week Exam Results D C BC B AB A Today: waves Have studied Newton s laws, motion of particles, momentum, energy, etc. Laws for describing things

More information

from ocean to cloud PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM

from ocean to cloud PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM Geoff Holland, Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks Geoff.holland@alcatel-lucent.com Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks Ltd, Christchurch Way,

More information

Caltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving 2014 update

Caltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving 2014 update Caltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving 2014 update Richard RODKIN 1 ; Keith POMMERENCK 2 1 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., United States 2 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., United States

More information

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-5004 NRL/MR/7182--08-9100 Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling J. Paquin Fabre Acoustic Simulation, Measurements,

More information

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay M. Fossati, D. Bellón, E. Lorenzo & I. Piedra-Cueva Fluid Mechanics and Environmental Engineering Institute (IMFIA), School of Engineering, Research

More information

An integrated three-dimensional model of wave-induced pore pressure and effective stresses in a porous seabed: II. Breaking waves

An integrated three-dimensional model of wave-induced pore pressure and effective stresses in a porous seabed: II. Breaking waves An integrated three-dimensional model of wave-induced pore pressure and effective stresses in a porous seabed: II. Breaking waves Author Jeng, D., Zhang, Hong Published 2005 Journal Title Ocean Engineering

More information

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS AP PHYSICS

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS AP PHYSICS DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS AP PHYSICS LSN 11-7: WAVE MOTION LSN 11-8: TYPES OF WAVES; LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE LSN 11-9: ENERGY TRANSPORTED BY WAVES Physics of Waves Questions From Reading

More information

SIO 210 Problem Set 3 November 4, 2011 Due Nov. 14, 2011

SIO 210 Problem Set 3 November 4, 2011 Due Nov. 14, 2011 SIO 210 Problem Set 3 November 4, 2011 Due Nov. 14, 2011 1. At 20 N, both the ocean and the atmosphere carry approximately 2 PW of heat poleward, for a total of about 4 PW (see figure). If (at this latitude)

More information

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser

Site Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser Site Summary Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser Station ID: 2857 Latitude: 55 7 45.8 N Longitude: 162 16 10.6 W Tower Type: 30 m NRG Tall

More information

Paper 2.2. Operation of Ultrasonic Flow Meters at Conditions Different Than Their Calibration

Paper 2.2. Operation of Ultrasonic Flow Meters at Conditions Different Than Their Calibration Paper 2.2 Operation of Ultrasonic Flow Meters at Conditions Different Than Their Calibration Mr William Freund, Daniel Measurement and Control Mr Klaus Zanker, Daniel Measurement and Control Mr Dale Goodson,

More information

Chapter 11 Waves. Waves transport energy without transporting matter. The intensity is the average power per unit area. It is measured in W/m 2.

Chapter 11 Waves. Waves transport energy without transporting matter. The intensity is the average power per unit area. It is measured in W/m 2. Chapter 11 Waves Energy can be transported by particles or waves A wave is characterized as some sort of disturbance that travels away from a source. The key difference between particles and waves is a

More information

An experimental study of internal wave generation through evanescent regions

An experimental study of internal wave generation through evanescent regions An experimental study of internal wave generation through evanescent regions Allison Lee, Julie Crockett Department of Mechanical Engineering Brigham Young University Abstract Internal waves are a complex

More information

Assessment of correlations between NDE parameters and tube structural integrity for PWSCC at U-bends

Assessment of correlations between NDE parameters and tube structural integrity for PWSCC at U-bends Assessment of correlations between NDE parameters and tube structural integrity for PWSCC at U-bends S. Bakhtiari, T. W. Elmer, Z. Zeng and S. Majumdar Nuclear Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory

More information

Seismic waves. Seismic waves, like all waves, transfer energy from one place to another without moving material. Seismic Waves 1 Author Paul Denton

Seismic waves. Seismic waves, like all waves, transfer energy from one place to another without moving material. Seismic Waves 1 Author Paul Denton Seismic waves When an earthquake happens deep underground a crack will start to open on a pre-existing line of weakness in the Earth s brittle crust. This crack will then grow larger and larger, relieving

More information

Ermenek Dam and HEPP: Spillway Test & 3D Numeric-Hydraulic Analysis of Jet Collision

Ermenek Dam and HEPP: Spillway Test & 3D Numeric-Hydraulic Analysis of Jet Collision Ermenek Dam and HEPP: Spillway Test & 3D Numeric-Hydraulic Analysis of Jet Collision J.Linortner & R.Faber Pöyry Energy GmbH, Turkey-Austria E.Üzücek & T.Dinçergök General Directorate of State Hydraulic

More information

Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings

Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings T. Lipecki 1 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Poland. t.lipecki@pollub.pl Abstract The paper

More information

Application of pushover analysis in estimating seismic demands for large-span spatial structure

Application of pushover analysis in estimating seismic demands for large-span spatial structure 28 September 2 October 2009, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Spain Alberto DOMINGO and Carlos LAZARO (eds.) Application of pushover analysis in estimating seismic demands for large-span spatial structure

More information

CHAPTER 16. Waves and Sound

CHAPTER 16. Waves and Sound CHAPTER 16 Waves and Sound Objectives: After completion of this module, you should be able to: Demonstrate your understanding of transverse and longitudinal waves. Define, relate and apply the concepts

More information

Effect of Profile Uniformity on Coating Performance

Effect of Profile Uniformity on Coating Performance November Problem Solving Forum Effect of Profile Uniformity on Coating Performance This Month s Question Is it necessary to control the uniformity of the surface profile for coating performance (i.e.,

More information

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE REPORT ON GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE CLIENT: KARNATAKA SOLAR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BANGALORE 0 GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

More information

Sea State Analysis. Topics. Module 7 Sea State Analysis 2/22/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D.

Sea State Analysis. Topics. Module 7 Sea State Analysis 2/22/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D. Sea State Analysis Module 7 Orson P. Smith, PE, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus Module 7 Sea State Analysis Topics Wave height distribution Wave energy spectra Wind wave generation Directional spectra Hindcasting

More information

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF GUIDED WAVE TRAVEL TIME TOMOGRAPHY

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF GUIDED WAVE TRAVEL TIME TOMOGRAPHY 18 th World Conference on Non destructive Testing, 16-20 April 2012, Durban, South Africa EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF GUIDED WAVE TRAVEL TIME TOMOGRAPHY Arno VOLKER 1 and Hendrik VOS 1 TNO, Stieltjesweg 1,

More information

CVEN Computer Applications in Engineering and Construction. Programming Assignment #4 Analysis of Wave Data Using Root-Finding Methods

CVEN Computer Applications in Engineering and Construction. Programming Assignment #4 Analysis of Wave Data Using Root-Finding Methods CVEN 30-501 Computer Applications in Engineering and Construction Programming Assignment #4 Analysis of Wave Data Using Root-Finding Methods Date distributed: 9/30/016 Date due: 10/14/016 at 3:00 PM (electronic

More information

Defined as a transfer of energy, in the form of a temporary disturbance of a medium, where the medium itself does not move.

Defined as a transfer of energy, in the form of a temporary disturbance of a medium, where the medium itself does not move. Waves: Defined as a transfer of energy, in the form of a temporary disturbance of a medium, where the medium itself does not move. Three Classifications of waves: 1. Mechanical waves: These are waves that

More information

Waves and Sound. Honors Physics

Waves and Sound. Honors Physics Waves and Sound Honors Physics Simple Harmonic Motion Refers to repetitive, cyclical motion (like a pendulum or waves) Can be described with sine curve For a pendulum only T 2 L g Example problem The world

More information

An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design

An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design An Overview of Wind Engineering Where Climate Meets Design Presented by Derek Kelly, M.Eng., P.Eng. Principal/Project Manager www.rwdi.com RWDI Leadership & Consulting Expertise RWDI Consulting Engineers

More information

Seismic Sources. Seismic sources. Recorders. Requirements; Principles; Onshore, offshore. Digitals recorders; Analog-to-Digital (A/D) converters.

Seismic Sources. Seismic sources. Recorders. Requirements; Principles; Onshore, offshore. Digitals recorders; Analog-to-Digital (A/D) converters. Seismic Sources Seismic sources Requirements; Principles; Onshore, offshore. Recorders Digitals recorders; Analog-to-Digital (A/D) converters. Reading: Reynolds, Section 4.5 Telford et al., Section 4.5

More information

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE REPORT ON GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE CLIENT: KARNATAKA SOLAR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BANGALORE 0 GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

More information

THE USE OF SPIN FIN PILES IN MASSACHUSETTS

THE USE OF SPIN FIN PILES IN MASSACHUSETTS THE USE OF SPIN FIN PILES IN MASSACHUSETTS Les R. Chernauskas, P.E., Geosciences Testing and Research, Inc., North Chelmsford, MA Leo J. Hart, Geosciences Testing and Research, Inc., North Chelmsford,

More information

The Effect of Driver Mass and Shaft Length on Initial Golf Ball Launch Conditions: A Designed Experimental Study

The Effect of Driver Mass and Shaft Length on Initial Golf Ball Launch Conditions: A Designed Experimental Study Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 34 (2012 ) 379 384 9 th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association (ISEA) The Effect of Driver Mass and Shaft Length on

More information

Designing Labyrinth Spillways for Less than Ideal Conditions Real World Application of Laboratory Design Methods

Designing Labyrinth Spillways for Less than Ideal Conditions Real World Application of Laboratory Design Methods Designing Labyrinth Spillways for Less than Ideal Conditions Real World Application of Laboratory Design Methods Gregory Richards, P.E., CFM, Gannett Fleming, Inc. Blake Tullis, Ph.D., Utah Water Research

More information

RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT, STATIC AND DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT, STATIC AND DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT, STATIC AND DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF TRANSMISSION LINE TOWER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY Yusuf Mansur Hashim M. Tech (Structural Engineering) Student, Sharda University, Greater Noida, (India)

More information

Lesson 14: Simple harmonic motion, Waves (Sections )

Lesson 14: Simple harmonic motion, Waves (Sections ) Circular Motion and Simple Harmonic Motion The projection of uniform circular motion along any ais (the -ais here) is the same as simple harmonic motion. We use our understanding of uniform circular motion

More information

INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENTAL ERROR (of full scale) INSTRUMENTAL RESOLUTION. Tutorial simulation. Tutorial simulation

INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENTAL ERROR (of full scale) INSTRUMENTAL RESOLUTION. Tutorial simulation. Tutorial simulation Lab 1 Standing Waves on a String Learning Goals: To distinguish between traveling and standing waves To recognize how the wavelength of a standing wave is measured To recognize the necessary conditions

More information

Real-Time Smoothness Measurements on Concrete Pavements During Construction

Real-Time Smoothness Measurements on Concrete Pavements During Construction Recommended Practice for Real-Time Smoothness Measurements on Concrete Pavements During Construction XX-## (2017) 1. SCOPE 1.1. This document provides language that can be used by an Owner-Agency to develop

More information

Chapter 11 Waves. Waves transport energy without transporting matter. The intensity is the average power per unit area. It is measured in W/m 2.

Chapter 11 Waves. Waves transport energy without transporting matter. The intensity is the average power per unit area. It is measured in W/m 2. Energy can be transported by particles or waves: Chapter 11 Waves A wave is characterized as some sort of disturbance that travels away from a source. The key difference between particles and waves is

More information

Offshore Wind Turbine monopile in 50 year storm conditions

Offshore Wind Turbine monopile in 50 year storm conditions TMR7 Experimental methods in marine hydrodynamics - lab exercise 3 2017 Offshore Wind Turbine monopile in 50 year storm conditions Trygve Kristiansen and Erin Bachynski, Trondheim, 20.09.2017 Background

More information

SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF THE MANHATTAN BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS

SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF THE MANHATTAN BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS 10NCEE Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 21-25, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF THE MANHATTAN BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS

More information

Shearwater GeoServices. Increasing survey productivity and enhancing data quality February 2017 Steve Hepburn Acquisition Geophysicist

Shearwater GeoServices. Increasing survey productivity and enhancing data quality February 2017 Steve Hepburn Acquisition Geophysicist Shearwater GeoServices Increasing survey productivity and enhancing data quality February 2017 Steve Hepburn Acquisition Geophysicist Shearwater GeoServices - Full Geophysical Service Company Marine Processing

More information

The Coriolis force, geostrophy, Rossby waves and the westward intensification

The Coriolis force, geostrophy, Rossby waves and the westward intensification Chapter 3 The Coriolis force, geostrophy, Rossby waves and the westward intensification The oceanic circulation is the result of a certain balance of forces. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics shows that a very

More information

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores

Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores Nearshore Circulation Undertow and Rip Cells Undertow - Zonation of Flow in Broken Wave Bores In the wave breaking process, the landward transfer of water, associated with bore and surface roller decay

More information

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes

Wind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes Wind Regimes 1 1 Wind Regimes The proper design of a wind turbine for a site requires an accurate characterization of the wind at the site where it will operate. This requires an understanding of the sources

More information

Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads

Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads Mechanical Stabilisation for Permanent Roads Tim Oliver VP Global Applications Technology Tensar International toliver@tensar.co.uk Effect of geogrid on particle movement SmartRock Effect of geogrid on

More information

Offshore engineering science

Offshore engineering science Offshore engineering science In this research stream theoretical models advanced geotechnical models and new numerical techniques were used in applied offshore engineering topics such as loading, design

More information

Wave energy converter effects on wave and sediment circulation

Wave energy converter effects on wave and sediment circulation Wave energy converter effects on wave and sediment circulation Grace Chang and Craig Jones Integral Consulting Inc. cjones@integral-corp.com; gchang@integral-corp.com Jesse Roberts, Kelley Ruehl, and Chris

More information

SEASONDE DETECTION OF TSUNAMI WAVES

SEASONDE DETECTION OF TSUNAMI WAVES SEASONDE DETECTION OF TSUNAMI WAVES Belinda Lipa, John Bourg, Jimmy Isaacson, Don Barrick, and Laura Pederson 1 I. INTRODUCTION We here report on preliminary results of a study to assess the capability

More information

Kathleen Dohan. Wind-Driven Surface Currents. Earth and Space Research, Seattle, WA

Kathleen Dohan. Wind-Driven Surface Currents. Earth and Space Research, Seattle, WA Updates to OSCAR and challenges with capturing the wind-driven currents. Wind-Driven Surface Currents Kathleen Dohan Earth and Space Research, Seattle, WA ENSO OSCAR Surface currents from satellite fields

More information

Earth s oceans covers 71 % _ of the planet s surface. In reality, Earth s ocean waters are all. interconnected as part of a single large global ocean.

Earth s oceans covers 71 % _ of the planet s surface. In reality, Earth s ocean waters are all. interconnected as part of a single large global ocean. Ocean Motion Met 101: Introduction to the World's Oceans Produced by The COMET Program Geography: Name Pd. Earth s oceans covers 71 % _ of the planet s surface. In reality, Earth s ocean waters are all

More information

DETRMINATION OF A PLUNGER TYPE WAVE MAKER CHARACTERISTICE IN A TOWING TANK

DETRMINATION OF A PLUNGER TYPE WAVE MAKER CHARACTERISTICE IN A TOWING TANK The 9 th International Conference on Coasts, Ports and Marine Structures (ICOPMAS 2010) 29 Nov.-1 Dec. 2010 (Tehran) DETRMINATION OF A PLUNGER TYPE WAVE MAKER CHARACTERISTICE IN A TOWING TANK sayed mohammad

More information

SURFACE CURRENTS AND TIDES

SURFACE CURRENTS AND TIDES NAME SURFACE CURRENTS AND TIDES I. Origin of surface currents Surface currents arise due to the interaction of the prevailing wis a the ocean surface. Hence the surface wi pattern (Figure 1) plays a key

More information

Influence of the Number of Blades on the Mechanical Power Curve of Wind Turbines

Influence of the Number of Blades on the Mechanical Power Curve of Wind Turbines European Association for the Development of Renewable Energies, Environment and Power quality International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ 9) Valencia (Spain), 15th to 17th

More information

Emission Inventory Evaluation Using DISCOVER-AQ Aircraft Data

Emission Inventory Evaluation Using DISCOVER-AQ Aircraft Data Emission Inventory Evaluation Using DISCOVER-AQ Aircraft Data Gary McGaughey, David Allen (PI) and Elena McDonald-Buller (co-pi) Center for Energy and Environmental Resources The University of Texas at

More information

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology Session 12: Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology Clement Cabanayan Emerson Process Management Abstract Continuous, accurate and reliable measurement of drilling fluid volumes and densities

More information

ENTUCKY RANSPORTATION C ENTER. College of Engineering

ENTUCKY RANSPORTATION C ENTER. College of Engineering Research Report KTC-05-34/SPR-297-05-1I T K ENTUCKY RANSPORTATION C ENTER College of Engineering USE OF ULTRA-LIGHTWEIGHT GEOFOAM TO REDUCE STRESSES IN HIGHWAY CULVERT EXTENSIONS Our Mission We provide

More information

ISOLATION OF NON-HYDROSTATIC REGIONS WITHIN A BASIN

ISOLATION OF NON-HYDROSTATIC REGIONS WITHIN A BASIN ISOLATION OF NON-HYDROSTATIC REGIONS WITHIN A BASIN Bridget M. Wadzuk 1 (Member, ASCE) and Ben R. Hodges 2 (Member, ASCE) ABSTRACT Modeling of dynamic pressure appears necessary to achieve a more robust

More information

Wind Flow Validation Summary

Wind Flow Validation Summary IBHS Research Center Validation of Wind Capabilities The Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS) Research Center full-scale test facility provides opportunities to simulate natural wind conditions

More information

THEORETICAL EVALUATION OF FLOW THROUGH CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR STAGE

THEORETICAL EVALUATION OF FLOW THROUGH CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR STAGE THEORETICAL EVALUATION OF FLOW THROUGH CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR STAGE S.Ramamurthy 1, R.Rajendran 1, R. S. Dileep Kumar 2 1 Scientist, Propulsion Division, National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore-560017,ramamurthy_srm@yahoo.com

More information

[Barve, 4(7): July, 2015] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

[Barve, 4(7): July, 2015] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785 IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY PARAMETRIC STUDY TO UNDERSTAND THE SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF INTZE TANK SUPPORTED ON SHAFT Prasad S. Barve *, Ruchi P. Barve * Civil

More information

Advancements in Personnel Incapacitation Methodologies for Multiple Cartridge Projectiles (MPCs)

Advancements in Personnel Incapacitation Methodologies for Multiple Cartridge Projectiles (MPCs) U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Advancements in Personnel Incapacitation Methodologies for Multiple Cartridge Projectiles (MPCs) NDIA Joint Armaments: Conference, Exhibition, and

More information

CFD AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AERODYNAMIC DEGRADATION OF ICED AIRFOILS

CFD AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AERODYNAMIC DEGRADATION OF ICED AIRFOILS Colloquium FLUID DYNAMICS 2008 Institute of Thermomechanics AS CR, v.v.i., Prague, October 22-24, 2008 p.1 CFD AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AERODYNAMIC DEGRADATION OF ICED AIRFOILS Vladimír Horák 1, Dalibor

More information

Seismic Waves. Overview: Targeted Alaska Grade Level Expectations: Whole Picture: Grades 5 8

Seismic Waves. Overview: Targeted Alaska Grade Level Expectations: Whole Picture: Grades 5 8 Seismic Waves Grades 5 8 Overview: Earthquakes are a potential tsunami generator. Scientists learn more about earthquakes by studying seismic waves. In this lesson, students explore the different types

More information

Enhanced Fragmentation Studies for a 40mm Dual Purpose Grenade

Enhanced Fragmentation Studies for a 40mm Dual Purpose Grenade Enhanced Fragmentation Studies for a 40mm Dual Purpose Grenade NDIA Joint Armaments Conference 16 May 2012 Paul A. Shipley AAI Corporation Hunt Valley, MD Richard Mills Textron Defense Systems Wilmington,

More information

Wave. 1. Transverse 2. Longitudinal 3. Standing

Wave. 1. Transverse 2. Longitudinal 3. Standing Wave Wave: A disturbance traveling through a medium by which energy is transferred from one particle of the medium to another without causing any permanent displacementof the medium itself. (A Wave Transports

More information

Walk - Run Activity --An S and P Wave Travel Time Simulation ( S minus P Earthquake Location Method)

Walk - Run Activity --An S and P Wave Travel Time Simulation ( S minus P Earthquake Location Method) Walk - Run Activity --An S and P Wave Travel Time Simulation ( S minus P Earthquake Location Method) L. W. Braile and S. J. Braile (June, 2000) braile@purdue.edu http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~braile Walk

More information

Mechanical waves Electromagnetic waves

Mechanical waves Electromagnetic waves Waves Energy can be transported by transfer of matter. For example by a thrown object. Energy can also be transported by wave motion without the transfer of matter. For example by sound waves and electromagnetic

More information

ZIN Technologies PHi Engineering Support. PHi-RPT CFD Analysis of Large Bubble Mixing. June 26, 2006

ZIN Technologies PHi Engineering Support. PHi-RPT CFD Analysis of Large Bubble Mixing. June 26, 2006 ZIN Technologies PHi Engineering Support PHi-RPT-0002 CFD Analysis of Large Bubble Mixing Proprietary ZIN Technologies, Inc. For nearly five decades, ZIN Technologies has provided integrated products and

More information

PARAMETRIZATION OF WAVE TRANSFORMATION ABOVE SUBMERGED BAR BASED ON PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL TESTS

PARAMETRIZATION OF WAVE TRANSFORMATION ABOVE SUBMERGED BAR BASED ON PHYSICAL AND NUMERICAL TESTS Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on the Application of Physical Modelling in Coastal and Port Engineering and Science (Coastlab16) Ottawa, Canada, May 10-13, 2016 Copyright : Creative Commons

More information

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 Test Monday, about half-way through grading. No D2L Assessment this week, watch for one next week

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 Test Monday, about half-way through grading. No D2L Assessment this week, watch for one next week Wednesday, September 27, 2017 Test Monday, about half-way through grading No D2L Assessment this week, watch for one next week Homework 3 Climate Variability (due Monday, October 9) Quick comment on Coriolis

More information

In this lesson, students determine the speed of a tsunami using tsunami time travel maps and Google Earth.

In this lesson, students determine the speed of a tsunami using tsunami time travel maps and Google Earth. Speedy Tsunami Overview: In this lesson, students determine the speed of a tsunami using tsunami time travel maps and Google Earth. Targeted Alaska Grade Level Expectations: Science [] SA1.1 The student

More information

from ocean to cloud HEAVY DUTY PLOUGH PERFORMANCE IN VERY SOFT COHESIVE SEDIMENTS

from ocean to cloud HEAVY DUTY PLOUGH PERFORMANCE IN VERY SOFT COHESIVE SEDIMENTS HEAVY DUTY PLOUGH PERFORMANCE IN VERY SOFT COHESIVE SEDIMENTS Geoff Holland, Sarah Dzinbal (Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks) Email: geoff.holland@alcatel-lucent.com Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks

More information

Increased streamer depth for dual-sensor acquisition Challenges and solutions Marina Lesnes*, Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, PGS

Increased streamer depth for dual-sensor acquisition Challenges and solutions Marina Lesnes*, Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, PGS Increased streamer depth for dual-sensor acquisition Challenges and solutions Marina Lesnes*, Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, PGS Summary The towing depth applicable to dual-sensor streamer acquisition has

More information

An Atlas of Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves (May 2002) by Global Ocean Associates Prepared for the Office of Naval Research - Code 322PO

An Atlas of Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves (May 2002) by Global Ocean Associates Prepared for the Office of Naval Research - Code 322PO Overview is located in the western Pacific Ocean along the west side of the Philippines (between approximately 5 o and 11 o N. latitude and 117 o and 123 o E. longitude). It is a deepwater sea, roughly

More information

OPTIMIZATION OF RECUPERATER FIN GEOMETRY FOR MICRO GAS TURBINE

OPTIMIZATION OF RECUPERATER FIN GEOMETRY FOR MICRO GAS TURBINE OPTIMIZATION OF RECUPERATER FIN GEOMETRY FOR MICRO GAS TURBINE S.Ramamurthy 1 and Bharat Makwana 2 1 Scientist,National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore, ramamurthy_srm@yahoo.com 2 Engineer,INOX Private

More information

User Applied Force to Assistive Jogger s Interface During Gait

User Applied Force to Assistive Jogger s Interface During Gait User Applied Force to Assistive Jogger s Interface During Gait Senior Capstone: Assistive Jogger MEE 443 Mechanical Engineering Laboratories University of Maine April 13, 2010 By: Joey Passarelli Alexander

More information

COMPUTATIONAL FLOW MODEL OF WESTFALL'S LEADING TAB FLOW CONDITIONER AGM-09-R-08 Rev. B. By Kimbal A. Hall, PE

COMPUTATIONAL FLOW MODEL OF WESTFALL'S LEADING TAB FLOW CONDITIONER AGM-09-R-08 Rev. B. By Kimbal A. Hall, PE COMPUTATIONAL FLOW MODEL OF WESTFALL'S LEADING TAB FLOW CONDITIONER AGM-09-R-08 Rev. B By Kimbal A. Hall, PE Submitted to: WESTFALL MANUFACTURING COMPANY September 2009 ALDEN RESEARCH LABORATORY, INC.

More information

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS IB PHYSICS LSN 4-2: TRAVELING WAVES Questions From Reading Activity? Essential Idea: There are many forms of waves available to be studied. A common characteristic

More information

Effects of directionality on wind load and response predictions

Effects of directionality on wind load and response predictions Effects of directionality on wind load and response predictions Seifu A. Bekele 1), John D. Holmes 2) 1) Global Wind Technology Services, 205B, 434 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia, seifu@gwts.com.au

More information

Time Pressure Dispensing

Time Pressure Dispensing Time Pressure Dispensing by Doug Dixon, GDM Product Manager What is time pressure dispensing? Time pressure is a method of dispensing liquid materials (surface mount adhesives and gasketing materials)

More information

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil 214 IJEDR Volume 2, Issue 4 ISSN: 2321-9939 Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil Narayan U Rathod Department of Mechanical Engineering, BMS college of Engineering, Bangalore, India Abstract - The

More information

APPENDIX B NOAA DROUGHT ANALYSIS 29 OCTOBER 2007

APPENDIX B NOAA DROUGHT ANALYSIS 29 OCTOBER 2007 APPENDIX B NOAA DROUGHT ANALYSIS 29 OCTOBER 2007 ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP October 29, 2007 Outline Overview Recent

More information

Specifications for Synchronized Sensor Pipe Condition Assessment (AS PROVIDED BY REDZONE ROBOTICS)

Specifications for Synchronized Sensor Pipe Condition Assessment (AS PROVIDED BY REDZONE ROBOTICS) Specifications for Synchronized Sensor Pipe Condition Assessment (AS PROVIDED BY REDZONE ROBOTICS) A. Scope of Work The work covered by these specifications consists of furnishing all materials, labor,

More information

The Use of ILI In Dent Assessments

The Use of ILI In Dent Assessments The Use of ILI In Dent Assessments Prepared for: 2014 CRUG Conference Date: 11 September 2014 Prepared by: Rhett Dotson, PE Contributions from Dr. Chris Alexander and Markus Ginten Contents Current Dent

More information

Standing Waves in a String

Standing Waves in a String Standing Waves in a String OBJECTIVE To understand the circumstances necessary to produce a standing wave. To observe and define the quantities associated with a standing wave. To determine the wavelength

More information

Influence of Settlement on Bearing Capacity Analysis of Shallow Foundations on Sandy Clays in the Niger Delta, Nigeria

Influence of Settlement on Bearing Capacity Analysis of Shallow Foundations on Sandy Clays in the Niger Delta, Nigeria Available online at www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com European Journal of Applied Engineering and Scientific Research, 201, 2 (4):20-27 (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html) ISSN: 22 0041 Influence

More information

Preview. Vibrations and Waves Section 1. Section 1 Simple Harmonic Motion. Section 2 Measuring Simple Harmonic Motion. Section 3 Properties of Waves

Preview. Vibrations and Waves Section 1. Section 1 Simple Harmonic Motion. Section 2 Measuring Simple Harmonic Motion. Section 3 Properties of Waves Vibrations and Waves Section 1 Preview Section 1 Simple Harmonic Motion Section 2 Measuring Simple Harmonic Motion Section 3 Properties of Waves Section 4 Wave Interactions Vibrations and Waves Section

More information

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S

Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S Executive Summary of Accuracy for WINDCUBE 200S The potential of offshore wind energy has gained significant interest due to consistent and strong winds, resulting in very high capacity factors compared

More information

Goal: Develop quantitative understanding of ENSO genesis, evolution, and impacts

Goal: Develop quantitative understanding of ENSO genesis, evolution, and impacts The Delayed Oscillator Zebiak and Cane (1987) Model Other Theories Theory of ENSO teleconnections Goal: Develop quantitative understanding of ENSO genesis, evolution, and impacts The delayed oscillator

More information