Land Transport (Road User) Amendment [2011] Rule 61001/6
|
|
- Daniela Hawkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Land Transport (Road User) Amendment [2011] Rule 61001/6 The Land Transport (Road User) Amendment Rule The government has agreed to change the give-way rules in order to improve road safety at intersections. Other proposed changes are a consequence of changing the give-way rules, or are required to align road user requirements with changes to the Land Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004 or to strengthen or clarify existing road user requirements. The change to the give-way rules was identified as a road safety priority in the government s road safety strategy, Safer Journeys New Zealand s Road Safety Strategy (Safer Journeys). Public and stakeholder submissions during the development of the strategy strongly supported a change to the rules. Cabinet agreed to the changes in September 2010 and this amendment Rule gives effect to that decision. It is estimated that changing the give-way rules will reduce relevant intersection crashes by 7 percent and will save one life, 13 serious injuries and 84 minor injuries per year. Public consultation The yellow draft of the amendment Rule was released for public consultation on 17 May 2011, and consultation concluded on 24 June In total, 134 submissions were received from members of the public, stakeholders and industry. Twelve proposals were included in the draft amendment rule. Some submitters took the opportunity to put forward their thoughts and concerns relating to other areas of the Road User Rule not covered by proposals in the amendment rule. Some submitters also took the opportunity to comment on other unrelated areas of land transport not covered by the Road User Rule. These comments have not been addressed in this paper.
2 Purpose of this paper This paper has been prepared by the Ministry of Transport, following public consultation. It summarises the analysis of the submissions received on the proposals included in the amendment rule, and identifies any recommended changes to the draft amendment rule. People who submitted in their capacity as private citizens will be referred to by their allocated submission number only. Submitters on behalf of organisations will be identified by the name of the organisation. Analysis of submissions, by proposal Proposal 1: It is proposed to amend the Rule to require a driver when turning right at an intersection to give way to all oncoming traffic travelling straight ahead or turning left, unless a traffic sign or traffic signal requires the driver to stop or give way. One hundred-twenty four submitters commented on proposal 1. Ninety submitters indicated support for the proposal and while 27 submitters disagreed with the proposal. Seven other submitters made comments, suggestions and/or asked questions about the proposal. Submitters identified a range of concerns with the proposal. All six Road Controlling Authorities and industry groups who submitted, supported the proposed changes to the give-way rules. Numerous submitters including the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons NZ Trauma Committee, the Southern District Health Board, Local Government NZ (LGNZ), road controlling authorities (RCAs), the Federation of Motoring Clubs Inc, Cycle Action Auckland, the Bus and Coach Association (BCA) and the Automobile Association (AA) all expressed concern that enough lead-in time needs to be given to local authorities and a comprehensive education campaign needs to be conducted. In particular, LGNZ and RCAs were concerned that little attention appears to have been given to implementation and that the costs imposed on local authorities are likely to be higher than anticipated. They commented that they would be seeking assistance from central government and the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) to ensure implementation issues can be managed and local authorities are given sufficient financial resources to manage local education campaigns before the proposed changes come into force on 1 April Some submitters who supported the proposal commented that it should come sooner than the planned 1 April 2012 date. 14 submitters expressed concern that the change to the give-way rule will result in a higher safety risk for vehicles turning right at an intersection as traffic will build up in the centre of the road, thereby increasing the risk of head on crashes as well as increasing congestion. Other submitters, including Traffic Institute of New Zealand (Trafinz) and the Road Transport Forum
3 (RTF) expressed concern about the potential increase in crashes in the short period following the introduction of the amendment Rule. The RTF was also concerned that the change to the give-way rule would increase the risk to motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians being struck by vehicles turning left at intersections. The RTF felt that cars and truck drivers may unwittingly cross the path of cyclists and motorcyclists that venture up the left hand side of their vehicles. A number of submitters felt that aligning New Zealand s give-way rules with overseas jurisdictions was not a good enough reason to the change the rules. Some submitters commented on a number of overseas jurisdictions road rules and suggested similar changes in New Zealand. One of the main suggestions was in relation to a road rule in the United States where a driver who is approaching a red light, and there is no other road users around, is allowed to turn left. The Federation of Motoring Clubs Inc suggested that a vehicle turning right into a single lane driveway will have no room to pass a vehicle that may be exiting a single lane driveway. Other submitters, including Public Health Southland and Living Streets Aotearoa, also made suggestions that New Zealand should make it compulsory that drivers turning at any intersection (except a round-about) must give way to any pedestrians and/or cyclists crossing the road they are entering. Nine submitters believed that the changes would complicate the road rules unnecessarily and create more confusion. The Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind was concerned that the proposed changes would not be communicated in appropriate formats to people with vision impairments. They offered to assist the NZTA in the preparation of these. The government has agreed that the change to the give-way rule will come into force on 1 April. This will allow sufficient time for an extensive education and publicity campaign to be carried out, and for RCAs to identify locations in their network that may be affected and need to be monitored. In deciding on this date, the government has been mindful that this is a significant change that will affect all drivers, and that the timing of the change needed to take into account high traffic periods such as the Rugby World Cup and Christmas holidays. The NZTA is developing an advanced communications plan in order to mitigate any confusion that may arise when the changes are implemented. The NZTA believes that the costs to local authorities will be small and most intersections will not require immediate change. NZTA intends to work with
4 RCAs to ensure consistent management of issues prior to implementation on 1 April Additionally, the education campaign will continue to run for a short period after the changes take affect to reinforce the requirement to motorists and minimise the risk of confusion on the roads. In response to the concern that the change to the give-way rule will result in a higher safety risk for vehicles turning right at an intersection, we disagree and believe that the changes will increase the safety benefits. The changes are estimated to reduce intersection crashes by seven percent and save one life, 13 serious injuries and 84 minor injuries per year. Additionally, right turning vehicles are usually impeded more by straight through traffic than opposing left turning vehicles. The proposed change to the rule will not affect that. The RTF was concerned that the changes will increase the risk of accidents for motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians being struck by vehicles turning left at intersections. We believe that if cyclists and motorcyclists comply with their legal responsibilities (to make the authorised movement from an appropriate lane and not to overtake moving traffic on the left if in the same lane) there will not be any increase in risk. Furthermore, if left turning traffic is not required to give way to right turning traffic, drivers will be able to concentrate on where they are going and have a better chance of avoiding any cyclists or motorcyclists. We agree with those submitters that stated that aligning New Zealand s giveway rules with overseas jurisdictions was not a strong enough reason to change our laws. However, as the main reason for this change is to improve road safety at intersections, aligning with international laws is an additional benefit. Comments from submitters about introducing road rules from overseas jurisdictions are outside the scope of this amendment Rule. They have previously been rejected because they create an unacceptable risk for pedestrians crossing with the signals. In response to the Federation of Motoring Clubs Inc concern about single lane driveways, we do not consider problems at single lane driveways will be exacerbated by the rule changes. Single lane driveways are generally low volume and if two right turning vehicles meet, general requirements to drive with due care for other road users dictate that the exiting vehicle will have to move before the entering vehicle can proceed, regardless of who is theoretically bound to give way. Living Streets Aotearoa and Public Health Southland made suggestions that the amendment Rule should make it compulsory for drivers to give way to pedestrians at intersections (with the exception of round-abouts). Drivers are already currently required to give way to pedestrians crossing with the green signal at intersections. Drivers entering or leaving a driveway are also currently required to give way to pedestrians on a footpath.
5 The NZTA is happy to take up the offer from the Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind to assist in preparing information for partially sighted people. Proposal 2: It is proposed to amend the Rule to require all traffic from a terminating road at an uncontrolled intersection to give way to all traffic travelling on a continuing road. Eighty-three submitters commented on this proposal. Seventy-one submitters indicated support for the proposal, nine submitters disagreed with the proposal and three submitters made comments, suggestions and/or asked questions about the proposal. Numerous submitters made the comment that the current Rule is not well known or obeyed by most drivers so the change was welcomed though it would have little effect. As in Proposal 1, some submitters were concerned that there would not be enough lead-in time before the change occurs and that an extensive education campaign needed to be carried out before the change takes effect. Submitter Y005 supported the proposal but suggested that it may be easier to erect Give Way signs at all of these intersections to make it absolutely clear. Other submitters, including the AA, expressed concern that this proposal would also involve removing give-way signs from these intersections. GHD supported the proposal but made the comment that changes may also need to be made to marking of roads when a continuing road is not obvious (eg. Y intersection). A number of submitters felt that if it was important for main road traffic to have right of way, then local authorities should make the intersection controlled. As with Proposal 1, the NZTA will conduct an extensive national communication and publicity campaign to inform the public of the new giveway requirements prior to implementation on 1 April This campaign will also run for a short period after the changes take affect to reinforce the requirement for motorists. For low volume intersections, it is difficult to justify the cost of installing and maintaining signs and markings. RCAs currently review the need for installing Give Way or Stop signs on a case by case basis and will continue to do so. Additionally, there is no intention to remove Give Way or Stop signs that already exist. RCAs are in the best position to determine this need and they must retain the ability to make such decisions.
6 We agree with GHD s suggestions and, as stated above, RCAs will need to be monitoring key intersections to determine which intersections will require adjustment. We disagree with submitters who believe all T-intersections should be controlled. The cost of installing a stop or give-way sign at every uncontrolled intersection could not be justified. We believe that this proposal will be clearer to follow in situations where controls are not present. Proposal 3: It is proposed to allow riders of motorcycles, moped and cycles using a bus lane that is controlled by a B (bus) signal to proceed on a white B signal. Riders of those vehicles would be required to comply with a yellow or red B signal. Forty-seven submitters commented on proposal 3. Thirty-eight submitters indicated support for the proposal and seven submitters disagreed with the proposal. Two submitters made comments, suggestions and/or asked questions about the proposal. The majority of submitters supported this proposal and agreed that it would increase the traffic flow and was a logical suggestion. Of the few submitters who disagreed with this proposal, the main concerns raised were that bus lanes should only be for buses and that it will create other obstacles for bus drivers. Motorcyclists, mopeds and cyclists are already allowed to use bus lanes. This rule is not proposing to change this, but instead to clarify that these forms of transport may proceed when a B signal is displayed. Whilst the main purpose of bus lanes is to provide priority for public transport, the use of these lanes by cyclists, mopeds and motorcycles does not appear to cause any major risks or loss of efficiency, except where B signals might be used. These B signals may be made ineffective due to the presence of cyclists, motorcyclists, and mopeds which are currently not permitted to move when a B signal is displayed. RCAs have the power to exclude these vehicles from using bus lanes by by-law if they so choose.
7 Proposal 4: It is proposed to require drivers to limit their speed to 20 km/h when passing a stationary school bus on which a school bus sign with flashing lights is activated. Sixty submitters commented on proposal 4. Forty submitters indicated support for the proposal and eleven submitters disagreed with the proposal. Nine submitters made comments, suggestions and/or asked questions about the proposal. Many submitters seemed to misunderstand the proposed change and commented on the 20 km/h speed limit that currently exists when passing a stationary school bus. These submitters felt that in rural areas this was an unrealistic speed to slow down to. Additionally, a number of submitters, including NZ Police, suggested buses be marked with a 20km/h sign, in order to alert drivers to the speed they should be travelling when passing a stationary school bus. Submitter Y019 highlighted that the objective of the proposal does not match the wording as the wording applies to a moving school bus where the driver has not turned off his lights. The proposed rule change is not addressing the existing 20km/h speed limit required when a driver is passing a stationary school bus with children embarking or disembarking. Instead, the proposed rule change is extending the situations when this must occur to also include school buses that are fitted with flashing lights. Enforcement of current rules is problematic as the police are required to demonstrate a number of variables before a prosecution can proceed with certainty. The proposed change should assist them in those situations where flashing light school bus signs are used. In response to submitters suggestions about a 20km/h sign being erected on school buses, this idea is currently being assessed in a trial under the auspices of the Traffic Control Devices Steering Committee. The results of that trial and possible options will be considered in the future.
8 Proposal 5: It is proposed to add a new pay-parking symbol ( P$ ) into the Rule. This symbol means that parking is permitted subject to payment of a fee. Twenty-six submitters commented on proposal 5. Nineteen submitters indicated support for the proposal, five submitters disagreed with the proposal and two submitters made comments, suggestions and/or asking questions about the proposal. Five submitters believed the proposal was unnecessary and a waste of money when adequate signage is already in place. One submitter supported it but did not want the proposed signage to be compulsory. The proposed parking sign ( P$ ) will not be mandatory. The P$ sign has been tested and found to have a high level of driver comprehension. It is expected to ensure that the message can be more easily read and seen by affected drivers. Proposal 6: It is proposed to replace the term taxi with small passenger service vehicle in subclauses 6.20(3) and 8.6(c) of the Rule. Twenty submitters commented on proposal 6 with 10 submitters indicating support for the proposal and nine submitters disagreeing with the proposal. One submitter made a comment (but neither agreed nor disagreed with the proposal). Of the submitters who did not support the proposal, a common comment was that the proposal was a waste of time and expense and that the use of the word taxi is recognised world wide. It is not proposed to change the name of a taxi. This proposal is intended to include taxi within the definition of small passenger service vehicle and will provide further clarity by aligning the definition with other rules.
9 Proposal 7: It is proposed to place a time limit on a medical certificate that allows a vehicle s occupants to be excluded from being restrained by a seatbelt or child restraint while travelling in the vehicle. Twenty-eight submitters commented on proposal 7 with 22 submitters indicating support for the proposal and two submitters disagreeing with the proposal. Four submitters made comments, suggestions and/or asked questions about the proposal. The main concerns raised by submitters were that the proposal should differentiate between temporary and permanent medical conditions and that permanent ones should not be subject to a two year time limit. Some submitters, including the Paediatric Society of NZ, Starship Trauma Service and Safekids New Zealand, made suggestions that the medical certificate for children should be limited to six months as it would be more applicable to children s growth. We agree with the comments that two years may be a short amount of time for ongoing or permanent conditions and too long for children s conditions. We suggest that medical practitioners should determine the time limit on certificates as they are best placed to fully understand the implications of the condition for seat belt use. The amendment Rule should require a medical certificate, that is issued on or after 1 October 2011, to be dated and specify for how long it is valid. We propose amending clause 7.11 of the amendment Rule to state that there must be a start date and an expiry date on medical certificates issued by medical practitioners on or after 1 October 2011, for the purpose of excluding vehicle occupants from being restrained by a seat belt or child restraint. Proposal 8: It is proposed to amend the Rule so that a bus driver is not obliged to ensure that his or her passengers are restrained by a suitable child restraint when the vehicle is being operated on the road. Thirty submitters commented on proposal 8 with 22 submitters indicating support for the proposal and six submitters disagreeing with the proposal. Two submitters made comments, suggestions and/or asked questions about the proposal. The main issue raised by those opposed to the proposal was that they believed that drivers should have the responsibility for ensuring the safety of all passengers. The Paediatric Society of NZ, Starship Trauma Service and Safekids New Zealand felt that a safety case had not been made in support of this proposal. Starship Trauma Service argued that it was inconsistent with the delivery of best practice protection of children as vulnerable road users.
10 Other submitters felt that it was appropriate that the requirement for a child to be suitably restrained was a responsibility of the parents. The previous rule inadvertently encouraged bus operators to remove seat belts from vehicles to avoid the issues arising from the driver responsibility of passengers wearing belts. This exception for bus drivers removes that pressure. It is considered that a bus driver must be able to concentrate on his driving rather than whether a passenger anywhere in the bus is wearing a belt or not. The driver does have a continuing obligation under clause 7.1 and 7.3 of the Rule to ensure passengers in the bus are safe. If passengers are moving around in the bus, standing or sitting in a way he or she considers dangerous, they should take appropriate steps to minimise harm. Proposal 9: It is proposed to align the Rule with the requirements in the Traffic Control Devices Rule that specify the length of time for which a school bus driver is allowed to operate a school bus sign that incorporates flashing lights. Twenty-six submitters commented on proposal 9. Twenty-two submitters indicated support for the proposal and two submitters disagreed with the proposal. Two submitters made comments, suggestion and/or asked questions about the proposal. The Western Bay of Plenty District Council supported the proposal but suggested a flashing speed value in addition to the sign proposed. Some submitters, including the AA and NZ Police, expressed concern about how this proposal would be monitored and enforced. NZ Police was concerned about the impact on bus drivers of ensuring that the flashing signs are deactivated within 20 seconds from the bus pulling away. It felt that bus drivers already have many other things to focus on as they are pulling away from the kerb and it would be an unfair to subject drivers to a penalty if they failed to deactivate the sign in the 20 second maximum time limit. NZ Police suggested 30 seconds would be a more reasonable time. Other suggestions made by submitters that supported the proposal included, requiring buses to have some form of notification at the buses instrument panel so that bus drivers can be alerted if they have left their flashing lights on.
11 As in proposal 4, a 20 km/h illuminated sign is currently being assessed in a trial under the auspices of the Traffic Control Devices Steering Committee. The results of that trial and possible options will be considered in the future. In response to the AA and NZ Police s concerns, it is suspected that very few, if any prosecutions, will eventuate where the bus driver turns the lights on or off immediately outside the 20 second period. The most likely prosecution, if any, will arise from incidents where the driver is travelling at or near normal road speeds well outside the 20 second period. The 20 second period is about warning other road users that the bus is about to stop to drop off children, or has just dropped children off and is departing (children may be crossing the road). Twenty seconds is the maximum time and the driver can choose not to have the sign on when departing a stop if there are no children around (i.e. the driver has already picked them up). We agree with the suggestion to ensure that there is some device to make bus drivers aware that their flashing lights may be left on. It has already been recommended that an audible device be installed which is activated when the flashing lights are operating. Proposal 10: It is proposed to amend the Rule so that drivers approaching a pedestrian crossing controlled by a school patrol do not have to stop if children are obviously waiting to cross but where a school patrol sign is not extended. Thirty-nine submitters commented on proposal 10. Twenty-one submitters indicated support for the proposal while 11 submitters disagreed with the proposal. Seven submitters made comments, suggestions and asked questions about the proposal. NZ Police, the AA and the RCAs support this proposal. Members of the public as well as the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons NZ Trauma Committee, the Southern District Health Board, the Paediatric Society of NZ, Starship Trauma Service and Safekids NZ opposed the proposal. Their concerns were that the change would be disadvantageous to children as a special group of vulnerable road users and that the case made for the proposal has not adequately demonstrated the change is required to maintain and improve road safety. Additionally, they believe it sends the wrong message by allowing vehicles the right of way at pedestrian crossings designed for pedestrians. The Ministry of Education neither agreed nor disagreed with the proposal, but asked the question, Has consideration been given to whether the person operating the school patrol sign will have difficulty with extending the sign on busy traffic days were there are few gaps between cars? They commented
12 that present rules allow for this as cars are expected to stop if people are waiting to cross. They recommended that if the proposed changes are made, that an evaluation of the workability of the rule is undertaken at a future date. This proposal provides further clarity for drivers who are approaching a pedestrian crossing that is controlled by a school patrol. This proposal makes it clear that when drivers are approaching a pedestrian crossing controlled by a school patrol and a school patrol sign is not extended, they do not have to stop. This is proposal is consistent with the school patrol rules set out in clause 3.9 of the Rule, which drivers are required to abide by. This is consistent with how NZ Police trains children that operate School Patrols. Children are trained not to extend the signs unless vehicles are outside preset marks (typically a tree, or lamp post or power pole) which are a fixed object either side of the pedestrian crossing. These marks are selected by the Police Education Officer (PEO) who trains the patrol. The patrol members are trained not to extend their signs unless an approaching vehicle is outside the mark. They are also trained to wait for groups of children to gather before extending their sign. Thus, children tend to cross in groups which improves traffic flow, particularly on busy arterial roads and State highways. It also reduces the number of individual crossings necessary during the time the patrols are operating. The proposed change to the Rule would remove the confusion for both drivers and school patrol members. Proposal 11: It is proposed to update the definition of parking in the Rule to align with the Traffic Control Devices Rule. Fourteen submitters commented on proposal 11. Eleven submitters indicated support for the proposal and three submitters disagreed with the proposal. Those who disagreed with the proposal stated that it was a waste of tax payers money and resulted in more red tape. We note the comments made by submitters and believe that the proposal will improve the clarity of rules.
13 Proposal 12: It is proposed to amend the definition of school bus so that a bus transporting school children on a school trip, and in which a seat is available for all passengers, is not required to be a school bus and be subject to the 80 km/h speed restriction and school bus sign requirements that apply to school buses. Thirty-four submitters commented on proposal 12. Twenty-one submitters indicated support for the proposal and 11 submitters disagreed with the proposal. Two submitters made comments, suggestions and asked questions about the proposal. The Ministry of Education, NZ Police, and the AA support this proposal. The main concerns raised by submitters who opposed the proposal were that a school bus is always a school bus and that this proposal would result in a higher risk of safety for school children. Some believed that this proposal would allow a double standard and inequity in the system. The BCA supported the objective proposal, but suggested amendments as it had concerns about the consequential effects on clause 5.6(1) of the Rule. The BCA expressed concern that the change to the definition of school bus will result in other road users passing charter vehicles embarking/disembarking school children at a speed greater than 20km/h than is required for school buses. In response to submitters concerns, this proposal does not stop a school from requiring a bus carrying its students on a school function to display a school bus sign or for bus operators to do so on their own volition. Decisions on whether to display a school bus sign or not are to be considered by either party in relation to the nature of the trip and the possible risks. Proposed suggestions for the re-drafting of the amendment Rule appear to further increase the complexity of the proposed changes. They suggest either specific exceptions for charter buses or provide clauses for a charter bus sign that would see motorists having to assess a wider range of factors to determine whether they have an obligation to slow to 20km/h or not. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence suggests that the embarking and disembarking of school children on school trips often occurs in dropping off bays or other such off-road areas. Consequently, a 20km/h speed limit for other motorists would not apply to a charter bus choosing not to display a school bus sign. :
14 Road User Amendment Rule 2011 Agree/Disagree Table Submissions Proposal Supports Comments, suggestions and questions Does not support Total
Napier City road trauma for Napier City. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues.
ISSN 1176-841X July 25 Land Transport New Zealand has prepared this road safety issues report. It is based on reported crash data and trends for the 2 24 period. The intent of the report is to highlight
More informationUnderstanding school road safety
Understanding school road safety 1. The purpose of these guidelines The safety of students travelling to and from school is one of the most important issues for school communities. Road environments around
More informationLand Transport Rule: Traffic Control Devices 2004
Rule 54002 Objective of the rule...2 Extent of consultation... 2 Material incorporated by reference... 3 Part 1 Rule requirements... 3 Section 1 Application...3 1.1 Title...3 1.2 Scope of the rule... 3
More information14. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS IN MOORHOUSE AVENUE
165 14. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS IN MOORHOUSE AVENUE General Manager responsible: General Manager City Environment, DDI 941-8528 Officer responsible: Transport and Greenspace Unit Manager
More informationRoad Safety Action Plan
Road Safety Action Plan Christchurch City, July 2018 June 2019 Goal: To enable collaborative planning among road safety inter-agencies to reduce deaths and serious injuries on Christchurch City roads 1
More informationQLDC Council 29 October Report for Agenda Item: 3
QLDC Council 29 October 2015 Department: Infrastructure Beach Street Pedestrianisation Purpose Report for Agenda Item: 3 1 The purpose of this report is to obtain Council approval to consult over options
More informationBus and Transit Lane Review Update
Board Meeting / 25 February 2013 Agenda Item no.8(i) Bus and Transit Lane Review Update Glossary Auckland Transport New Zealand Transport Agency Transit Two Transit Three (AT) (NZTA) (T2) (T3) Executive
More informationTRANSPORTATION POLICY
TRANSPORTATION POLICY Contents 1 NQS... 2 2 National Regulations... 2 3 Aim... 2 4 Related Policies... 2 5 Implementation... 2 6 General Transport Guidelines... 4 7 Guidelines for Seatbelts and Restraints...
More informationPassing Emergency Vehicles and School Speed Zones
RAA Member Panel Passing Emergency Vehicles and School Speed Zones The State Government is currently reviewing the speed limits in place when passing emergency vehicles with blue and red flashing lights.
More informationNZ Transport Agency Safer journeys for schools: guidelines for school communities 2
NZ Transport Agency Safer journeys for schools: guidelines for school communities 2 Understanding road risk around schools 1. The purpose of these guidelines The safety of students travelling to and from
More informationManifesto for a safe, efficient and sustainable transport in NZ
8 January 2018 Manifesto for a safe, efficient and sustainable transport in NZ Movement is an alliance of organisations working to achieve a safe, efficient and sustainable transport system that provides
More informationReport to Cabinet. 18 May 2016
Agenda Item 8 Report to Cabinet 18 May 2016 Subject: Presenting Cabinet Member: Proposed CCTV Enforcement of Traffic Contraventions in a Bus Lane (Key Decision Ref. No. HE030) Highways and Environment
More informationSafe school travel. InformatIon for parents
Safe school travel InformatIon for parents Tips to improve children s safety around your school Children aged four years to under seven years must be secured in a forward facing restraint or booster seat.
More informationTRANSPORTATION POLICY
TRANSPORTATION POLICY Contents 1 NQS... 2 2 National Regulations... 2 3 Aim... 2 4 Related Policies... 2 5 Implementation... 2 6 General Transport Guidelines... 4 7 Guidelines for Seatbelts and Restraints...
More informationLocal Government Road Safety Summit - 9 April 2018
Local Government Road Safety Summit - 9 April 2018 Report on outcomes The Associate Minister of Transport, Hon Julie Anne Genter held the Local Government Road Safety Summit in Wellington on 9 April 2018.
More information2003 road trauma for. Wairoa District. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues WAIROA DISTRICT JULY 2004
WAIROA DISTRICT JULY 24 T he Land Transport Safety Authority (LTSA) has prepared this road safety issues report. It is based on reported crash data and trends for the 1999 23 period. The intent of the
More informationLand Transport Rule Setting of Speed Limits 2017
Land Transport Rule Setting of Speed Limits 2017 Frequently asked questions yellow draft consultation This document provides answers to questions relating to the proposed Land Transport Rule: Setting of
More informationArlington County Police Department Law Enforcement Guide. Enforcing Bicycle Traffic Laws
Arlington County Police Department Law Enforcement Guide Enforcing Bicycle Traffic Laws Arlington County Police Department Safe Bicycling Initiative 2016 About the Arlington Safe Bicycling Initiative The
More informationENCOURAGING TAXI DRIVERS TO BEHAVE: GRAFTON BRIDGE TAXI AND BUS LANE TRIAL
Encouraging Taxi Drivers to Behave Douglas-Jones, Segedin Page 1 ENCOURAGING TAXI DRIVERS TO BEHAVE: GRAFTON BRIDGE TAXI AND BUS LANE TRIAL Presenter: Rob Douglas-Jones, MEng, Traffic Operations Manager
More informationCitizens Cycling Jury. Sharing the Roads Safely Final Recommendations. November RAA Response to Recommendations
Citizens Cycling Jury Sharing the Roads Safely Final Recommendations November 2014 RAA Response to Recommendations Background The Citizen s Jury Report entitled Sharing the Road Safely was presented to
More informationUnit Six: Driving Faster with More Risk URBAN, SUBURBAN, AND RURAL DRIVING
Unit Six: Driving Faster with More Risk URBAN, SUBURBAN, AND RURAL DRIVING What Is The Impact Of Distraction? Objectives For Unit Six Students will be able to describe the skills necessary to What safely
More informationCITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY
CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY VERSION: 1.0 April 10, 2012 Pedestrians, Cyclists and Motorists Sharing Street Spaces CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 POLICY GOAL... 3 POLICY OBJECTIVES... 3 GUIDING
More informationSpeed Limits in the Hoddle Grid
Speed Limits in the Hoddle Grid Recent History of speed limits March 2013 Docs # 7738485 1 Introduction Muncipalities have power to Erect speed limit signs BUT Municipalities DO NOT have the power to approve
More informationLand Transport Rule Traffic Control Devices 2004
WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND PURSUANT to Section 152 of the Land Transport Act 1998 I, Harry James Duynhoven, Minister for Transport Safety, HEREBY make the following ordinary rule: Land Transport Rule: Traffic
More information8 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT DUFFERIN STREET AND KING VAUGHAN ROAD INTERSECTION CITY OF VAUGHAN
8 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT DUFFERIN STREET AND KING VAUGHAN ROAD INTERSECTION CITY OF VAUGHAN The Transportation Services Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation contained in the following report
More informationroad safety issues 2001 road toll for Gisborne district July 2002 Road user casualties Estimated social cost of crashes*
GISBORNE DISTRICT road safety issues July 22 The Land Transport Safety Authority (LTSA) has prepared this Road Safety Issues Report. It is based on reported crash data and trends for the 1997 21 period.
More informationIntroduction. 2
Introduction In 2010, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 64/255 proclaiming 2011 2020 to be a Decade of Action for Road Safety. 1 In order to establish a baseline for the road safety
More informationroad safety issues 2002 road trauma for Tauranga District July 2003 Regional crash causes Estimated social cost of crashes*
road safety issues July 23 22 road trauma for Tauranga District The Land Transport Safety Authority (LTSA) has prepared this road safety issues report. It is based on reported crash data and trends for
More informationPOLICY AGENDA For Elder Pedestrian Safety
POLICY AGENDA For Elder Pedestrian Safety Older adults and people with disabilities often have mobility, cognitive, and sensory limitations that affect their behavior as pedestrians and place them at risk
More informationReduction of Speed Limit at Approaches to Railway Level Crossings in WA. Main Roads WA. Presenter - Brian Kidd
Australasian College of Road Safety Conference A Safe System: Making it Happen! Melbourne 1-2 September 2011 Reduction of Speed Limit at Approaches to Railway Level Crossings in WA Radalj T 1, Kidd B 1
More informationNZ Transport Agency Cycling Rules
NZ Transport Agency Cycling Rules https://www.nzta.govt.nz/walking-cycling-and-public-transport/cycling/for-peopl e-involved-in-cycling-programmes-and-projects/cycling-resources-and-research/ General regulatory
More informationNZTA Standards and Guidelines
NZTA Standards and Guidelines Bob Gibson Principal Engineer, Network Standards and Safety, New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) has for many years worked in the Government sector. In recent years his work
More informationPAEKĀKĀRIKI HILL ROAD / BEACH ROAD / SH1 INTERSECTION PROGRESS REPORT
Chairperson and Committee Members ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 6 DECEMBER 2011 Meeting Status: Public Purpose of Report: For Decision PAEKĀKĀRIKI HILL ROAD / BEACH ROAD / SH1 INTERSECTION
More informationUNIT V 1. What are the traffic management measures? [N/D-13] 2. What is Transportation System Management (TSM)? [N/D-14]
UNIT V 1. What are the traffic management measures? [N/D-13] Some of the well-known traffic management measures are: a) Restrictions on turning movements b) One - way streets c) Tidal - flow operations
More informationRegional Cycling Plan
Adopted December 2008 Quality for Life Adopted December 2008 For more information, contact: Greater Wellington 142 Wakefield Street PO Box 11646 Manners Street Wellington 6142 T 04 384 5708 F 04 385 6960
More informationDYNAMIC LANES FOR AUCKLAND
Dynamic Lanes for Auckland MENEZES M. and INMAN R. Page 1 DYNAMIC LANES FOR AUCKLAND Authors: INMAN, Robert BA (Hons) Previously Auckland Transport Senior Traffic Engineer Now Aurecon Robert.Inman@aurecongroup.com
More informationPeople killed and injured per million hours spent travelling, Motorcyclist Cyclist Driver Car / van passenger
Cyclists CRASH FACTSHEET 27 CRASH STATISTICS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DEC 26 Prepared by Strategy and Sustainability, Ministry of Transport Cyclists have a number of risk factors that do not affect car drivers.
More informationThe OSCAR Driver s Handbook Driving for OSCAR Services
The OSCAR Driver s Handbook Driving for OSCAR Services Transportation is an essential part of the service we provide each day for the children enrolled with us. When moving children to and from school,
More informationResponse Road Safety Strategy for New South Wales
Response Road Safety Strategy for New South Wales 2012-2021 The Amy Gillett Foundation (AGF) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Road Safety Strategy for New South Wales 2012-2021 (the Strategy).
More information21. CHRISTCHURCH CYCLE LANES: PROPOSED COLOURED SURFACING CHANGE
21. CHRISTCHURCH CYCLE LANES: PROPOSED COLOURED SURFACING CHANGE General Manager responsible: General Manager City Environment, DDI 941-8608 Officer responsible: Transport and Greenspace Manager Author:
More informationImproving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection Date: August 17, 2012 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Public Works and Infrastructure Committee
More informationComprehensive Measures to Reduce Traffic Accident Fatalities
Comprehensive Measures to Reduce Traffic Accident Fatalities Outcomes: 4,621 people died as a result of traffic accidents in 2015. It represents 4% decrease compared to 2014. Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 Traffic
More informationCYCLISTS AND MOTORISTS SHARE THE ROAD SAND SPRINGS
CYCLISTS AND MOTORISTS SHARE THE ROAD SAND SPRINGS Sand Springs Police Department Summary of Bicycle Laws in Oklahoma The Sand Springs Police Department receives many questions each year about cycling
More informationthe Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material
Cyclists 2015 Disclaimer All reasonable endeavours are made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this report. However, the information is provided without warranties of any kind including accuracy,
More informationROAD TRAFFIC CODE PENALTIES NOTE; Not all penalty provisions are recorded here. If not listed please refer to RTC.
REG 9 ROAD TRAFFIC CODE PENALTIES NOTE; Not all penalty provisions are recorded here. If not listed please refer to RTC. Max penalties (regs 230 21) 1 st offence -Subsequent offence Max penalties (all
More information2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy
Transport Strategy Providing quality connections Contents 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Long-term direction 4. Three-year priorities 5. Strategy tree Wellington City Council July 2006 1. Introduction Wellington
More informationReducing Speed: The C-Roundabout
Reducing Speed: The C-Roundabout Ivan Jurisich (PRESENTER) NZCE (Civil) BSc(Maths) MPhil (Civil Eng) Member of ITE Traffic Engineering Solutions Ltd Phone: +649 366 7532 Email: ivan.jurisich@tes.net.nz
More informationBorough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines
Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines Adopted by Borough Council on 1 INTRODUCTION Speeding Traffic is a major concern in the Borough of Danville because of its detrimental impacts
More informationMEETING DATE: DECEMBER 9, SUBJECT: Use Of Cameras To Enforce Transit Lanes RECOMMENDATIONS. It is recommended that the Commission:
MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Use Of Cameras To Enforce Transit Lanes RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Commission: 1. Receive this report for information, noting that; several major
More informationPetition 2014/59 of Joanne Clendon
Petition 2014/59 of Joanne Clendon Report of the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee Contents Recommendation 2 The petitioner s submission 2 Response from submitters 6 Concerns raised by opponents
More informationBristol City Council has produced a draft Bristol Transport Strategy document.
Bristol Transport Strategy Summary Document Introduction Bristol City Council has produced a draft Bristol Transport Strategy document. The Strategy fills a gap in transport policy for Bristol. We have
More informationRoad Safety Partnership
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Introduction Road accidents can have a devastating impact not only for the people directly
More informationDriver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations. Ms. Marx
Driver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations Ms. Marx Speed Control Speed is one of the most common contributing factors of fatal & other types of accidents School zones, business or residential
More informationSafe Speed programme ATTACHMENT 1. Randhir Karma, Group Manager Network Management and Safety
Safe Speed programme ATTACHMENT 1 Randhir Karma, Group Manager Network Management and Safety 1 Why Safe Speeds? AT s strategic context National guidance AT has embraced Vision Zero principles and recognises
More informationDeaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2007 June 2011 (All ages) Mode of travel
Cyclists CRASH STATISTICS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 211 Prepared by the Ministry of Transport CRASH FACTSHEET 212 Cyclists have a number of risk factors that do not affect car drivers. The main risk
More informationCITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL
CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL Page 1 of 7 DEPARTMENT: Engineering Services SUBJECT: Traffic Calming Policy (Revised June 6, 2017) Policy Statement: The provision of traffic calming measures
More informationOcc c u c pa p n a t pro r t O ec e t c i t O i n
Occupant Protection Occupant Protection Introduction Buckling up or being buckled in is the most effective protection during a car crash. The simple truth is that the great majority of people ejected from
More informationFlorida Class E Knowledge Exam Road Rules Practice Questions
1. If you are being followed too closely while driving, you should: A. Drive closer to the car in front of you. B. Speed up to increase the distance between you and the following vehicle. C. Slow down
More informationParental Responsibilities
Bicycle riding is a fun way to exercise and enjoy the outdoors. To remain safe on Illinois roads, bicyclists must obey the same traffic safety laws that govern vehicle drivers. No amount of bicycle safety
More informationPass your Driving Test with confidence
Pass your Driving Test with confidence Sample theory questions, and answers to help you prepare for your driving test. Q1. When should you not drive? While under the influence of alcohol, drugs (prescribed
More informationCabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Highway Infrastructure Manager
LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES DATE: AUGUST 2015 DECISION MAKER: LEAD OFFICER: SUBJECT: WARDS: Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene Highway Infrastructure Manager PROPOSED CYCLING IMPROVEMENTS
More information20mph in Edinburgh. Phil Noble
20mph in Edinburgh Phil Noble Structure of Presentation Where have we come from? South Edinburgh Pilot results Citywide 20 - strategy, consultation, implementation IMAGE? 2 20mph zones and pilot area (2012)
More informationSafety and Active Transport. Dr. Maureen Carew, Medical Officer of Health Renfrew County and District Health Unit May 30, 2014
Safety and Active Transport Dr. Maureen Carew, Medical Officer of Health Renfrew County and District Health Unit May 30, 2014 Active Transport Vision Increase levels of walking and cycling Reduce vehicle
More informationEconomic and Social Council
UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL TRANS/WP.1/2003/3/Rev.4 23 April 2004 ENGLISH Original: ENGLISH, FRENCH and RUSSIAN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE
More informationP.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council December 12, 2017
P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 14.1.2 Halifax Regional Council December 12, 2017 TO: Mayor Savage and Members of Halifax Regional Council SUBMITTED BY: Jacques Dubé, Chief Administrative
More informationROAD SAFETY IN COUNTRIES WITH LESS DEVELOPED INFRASTRUCTURES: Policies to maximize effect with minimum resources
ROAD SAFETY IN COUNTRIES WITH LESS DEVELOPED INFRASTRUCTURES: Policies to maximize effect with minimum resources Prof G. A. Giannopoulos Head, Hellenic Institute of Transport National Center for Research
More informationbriefing notes - road safety issues
briefing notes road safety Waikato District briefing notes - road safety issues Waikato District New Zealand Transport Agency has prepared this eleventh road safety issues report. It is based on reported
More informationThe Safe System Approach
There are very few areas of public discussion and sentiment which generate as much consensus as road safety. Everyone wants safer roads for all users, and road safety is a key priority for governments,
More informationResponse to further information request Ministry of Education Notice of Requirement (200 & 252 Park Estate Road)
21 Pitt Street PO Box 6345, Auckland 1141, New Zealand T: +64 9 300 9000 // F: +64 9 300 9300 E: info@beca.com // www.beca.com Auckland Council Private Bag 92300 Victoria Street West Auckland 1142 15 August
More informationMODULE 1 ROAD SAFETY QUIZ - KEYS4LIFE ONLINE
MODULE 1 ROAD SAFETY QUIZ - KEYS4LIFE ONLINE Questions and Answers Question 1 If you are travelling in a lane that has a left-turn arrow marked on the road, can you drive straight ahead? Yes, if no other
More informationDraft Railway Crossing Safety Strategy. RAA feedback on the Draft Railway Crossing Safety Strategy
Draft Railway Crossing Safety Strategy RAA feedback on the Draft Railway Crossing Safety Strategy September 2016 CONTENTS... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 RECOMMENDATION... 3 DISCUSSION... 3 Background/Overview...
More informationLow Level Cycle Signals used as repeaters of the main traffic signals Appendices
Low Level Cycle Signals used as repeaters of the main traffic signals Appendices Track trial report This document contains the appendices to accompany the report from the first sub-trial of a larger track
More informationRural Economy and Connectivity Committee. Restricted Roads (20mph Speed Limit) (Scotland) Bill: Key Themes Arising from the Online Survey
Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee Restricted Roads (20mph Speed Limit) (Scotland) Bill: Key Themes Arising from the Online Survey Introduction On Friday 9 November 2018, the Rural Economy and Connectivity
More informationControlled. Semi-Controlled PAGE 01 CHAPTER 12 INTERSECTIONS
PAGE 01 CHAPTER 12 INTERSECTIONS You will cross many intersections while driving. Intersections are especially dangerous because vehicles are crossing each other s driving path. Many crashes happen at
More informationGuide to the Cycle Enfield Public Consultation on Enfield Town. Produced by the Save Our Enfield Town Campaign Group
Guide to the Cycle Enfield Public Consultation on Enfield Town Produced by the Save Our Enfield Town Campaign Group What s in this guide? Introduction Page 3 What Enfield Council says about Option 1 Page
More informationBerwick Health and Education Precinct: Casey Amendment C207 (Part 1) Submission to Planning Panels Victoria
Berwick Health and Education Precinct: Casey Amendment C207 (Part 1) Submission to Planning Panels Victoria August 2018 CONTENTS 1 Executive summary... 1 2 Summary of the amendment... 2 3 Submission...
More informationPedestrians safety. ROAD SAFETY SEMINAR PIARC/AGEPAR/GRSP Lome, Togo October 2006 Lise Fournier, Canada-Qu
Pedestrians safety ROAD SAFETY SEMINAR Lome, Togo October 2006 Lise Fournier, Canada-Qu Québec Contents WHO s data Risk factors Pedestrian needs Pedestrian facilities Conclusion Source: WHO WHO reports
More informationHighway Code for Cyclists Operation Close-Pass
Highway Code for Cyclists Operation Close-Pass 1 2 Operation Close-Pass For the 2 million people who cycle every day, close passes are an almost daily occurrence. Close passes are really intimidating and
More informationFAQ s Walsh Road / Ferguson Road Pilot Scheme
FAQ s Walsh Road / Ferguson Road Pilot Scheme What is happening? Traffic calming measures are being installed as a pilot. Temporary Bollards will be installed to the east of 1 Ferguson Road and a Temporary
More informationRAA Member Panel. Roundabout Road Rules
RAA Member Panel Roundabout Road Rules This member panel focused on how the Member Panel uses roundabouts in South Australia and interacts with other road users. The survey included different roundabout
More informationP.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No Halifax Regional Council May 9, 2017
P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 14.1.4 Halifax Regional Council May 9, 2017 TO: Mayor Savage and Members of Halifax Regional Council SUBMITTED BY: Brad Anguish, A/Chief Administrative
More informationRegional Cycle Programme Update
Agenda Item 10 (ii) Regional Cycle Programme Update Glossary Auckland Council Auckland Transport Cycle Action Auckland New Zealand Transport Agency Regional Cycle Network (AC) (AT) (CAA) (NZTA) (RCN) Executive
More informationStriving for Excellence
Bus Transport Policy and Procedures Please note this is a Draft Policy to support the trial of our bus run commencing Term One, 2013. This policy will require adaption as needed through out the trial period.
More informationNovember 2, Government takes on the challenge of improving traffic safety
November 2, 2006 Government takes on the challenge of improving traffic safety Edmonton... The Alberta government has taken on the challenge of improving traffic safety by moving ahead with a comprehensive,
More informationDiscover the Safe System Approach
Discover the Safe System Approach Aim Take you on a journey of discovery Inform, engage, enthuse and share with you the Safe System approach to saving death and injury on our roads Change to less graphic
More informationNZQA unit standard version 1 Page 1 of 6. Describe hazards and apply risk reduction techniques and strategies while driving a bus or coach
Page 1 of 6 Title Describe hazards and apply risk reduction techniques and strategies while driving a bus or coach Level 4 Credits 10 Purpose People credited with this unit standard are able to: describe
More informationRESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL. 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving the aims of the Bill?
RURAL ECONOMY AND CONNECTIVITY COMMITTEE RESTRICTED ROADS (20 MPH SPEED LIMIT) (SCOTLAND) BILL SUBMISSION FROM CYCLE STIRLING Questions 1. Is reducing the speed limit to 20mph the best way of achieving
More informationChapter 5: Crossing the Street
Chapter 5: Crossing the Street Whether walking or bicycling, a student s journey to school will more than likely require crossing one or more streets. Per the Safe Routes to School Guide, maintained by
More informationGovernance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting
CITY OF VICTORIA For the July 2, 2015 Meeting To: Governance and Priorities Committee Date: From: Subject: Brad Dellebuur, A/Assistant Director, Transportation and Parking Services Executive Summary The
More informationTRAFF IC CALMING POLICY
TRAFF IC CALMING POLICY Policy No: 45396 Approved by Council 28 May 2008 C11/05/08 Further amendment by Council 22 June 2011 vide c08/06/11 Contents 1 Problem Statement 1 2 Desired Outcomes 2 3 Strategic
More informationRoads and public rights of way
Roads and public rights of way This factsheet outlines how the effects of the Proposed Scheme on roads and public rights of way (PRoW) along the line of route would be managed. Version 1.0 Last updated:
More informationTHE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO CYCLING SAFELY IN PHILADELPHIA
B IKE NICE THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO CYCLING SAFELY IN PHILADELPHIA A partnership of the City of Philadelphia and the Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia ABOUT VISION ZERO & BIKE NICE It s a great day
More informationReview of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing
Review of Guidelines for Cycleway 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This document is meant to provide a review of available reference documents for determining appropriate fencing requirements for cycleway paths and shared
More informationSchool Bus Safety in Australia Newman, Shannon L., & Tziotis, Michael, (ARRB Transport Research Ltd).
School Bus Safety in Australia Newman, Shannon L., & Tziotis, Michael, (ARRB Transport Research Ltd). Abstract In 1999 ARRB Transport Research was commissioned by Austroads to undertake a review current
More informationCycling and risk. Cycle facilities and risk management
Cycling and risk Cycle facilities and risk management Failure to recognize possibilities is the most dangerous and common mistake one can make. Mae Jemison, astronaut 6/11/2010 York Regional Council Cycling
More informationAt each type of conflict location, the risk is affected by certain parameters:
TN001 April 2016 The separated cycleway options tool (SCOT) was developed to partially address some of the gaps identified in Stage 1 of the Cycling Network Guidance project relating to separated cycleways.
More informationR O A D S A F E T Y E D U C A T I O N
R O A D S A F E T Y E D U C A T I O N Pedestrians Just because you use the road doesn t mean you own it One in five road deaths is a pedestrian. 74% of pedestrian deaths are caused by the pedestrian most
More informationNorthland Region road trauma for Northland Region. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues
ISSN 1176-841X July 26 Land Transport has prepared this road safety issues report. It is based on reported crash data and trends for the 21 25 period. The intent of the report is to highlight key road
More informationWestern Bay of Plenty/ Tauranga Area
ISSN 1176-841X July 5 Land Transport New Zealand has prepared this report. It is based on reported crash data and trends for the 4 period. The intent of the report is to highlight the key and provide partners
More informationTraffic Calming Policy
Article I. Purpose and Goal. The purpose of this policy is to establish criteria and procedures the City will use to evaluate requests for, and if appropriate, implement traffic calming measures. Neighborhood
More information