ADA Title II Compliance Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan. Lee County, Florida Second Street. Fort Myers, FL

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ADA Title II Compliance Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan. Lee County, Florida Second Street. Fort Myers, FL"

Transcription

1 ADA Title II Compliance Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan 2017 Lee County, Florida 2115 Second Street Fort Myers, FL Florida Relay 711

2 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Contents I. ADA Legislative Mandates... 4 A. The Americans with Disabilities Act and Amendments... 4 B. Designation of an ADA Coordinator 28 C.F.R (a)... 4 C. Notice of ADA Policy 28 C.F.R D. Establish and Publish Grievance Procedures 28 C.F.R (b)... 5 II. Self-Evaluation 28 C.F.R A. Physical Accessibility 28 C.F.R and Transportation Transit (LeeTran) Facilities... 8 B. Non-Structural Service and Program Accessibility 28 C.F.R Subrecipient and Vendor Contracts Communication/Training 28 C.F.R Public hearings/meetings Alternate Delivery of Services Public Safety Language Assistance C. Public Input D. Records Retention III. Transition Plan 28 C.F.R (d) A. Transportation Cost Consideration Target Timeline B. Transit (LeeTran) Cost Consideration Target Timeline C. Facilities Cost Consideration Target Timeline IV. Action Plan V. Appendices Appendix 1 Policies and Procedure January 24, 2017 Page 1

3 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan A. Notice of ADA Policy B. Public Notice of Grievance Procedure C. Recommended Notice of Accommodation D. Title VI LEP Plan Appendix 2 Self-Evaluation A. ADA Self-Evaluation Questionnaire B. ADA County Contractor and Subrecipient Contract Notice C. Website ADA Policies and Notices D. Public Access Computers Windows 7 Accessibility E. Department of Transportation Atkins Report F. Lee County Transit FY14 FTA Triennial Review Appendix 3 Transition Plans A. Lee County ADA Transportation Transition Plan FY17-FY21 B. LeeTran ADA Stop Location Transition Plan FY17 C. Lee County Facilities ADA Transition Plan FY17-FY19 January 24, 2017 Page 2

4 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Section I ADA Legislative Mandates January 24, 2017 Page 3

5 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan I. ADA Legislative Mandates A. The Americans with Disabilities Act and Amendments The Americans with Disabilities Act became law in For people with disabilities, it reinforces the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of ADA Title II regulations for government service providers were amended in Those amendments resulted in the 2010 ADA Standards of Accessible Design and the Department of Justice 2016 Final Rule. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) states that a public entity must reasonably modify its policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination against people with disabilities. Lee County complies with this mandate through self evaluation, a transition plan for upgrading facilities and an action plan for directing policies and programs toward compliance with the ADA. This ADA Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan assists Lee County administration, operations directors, program managers and all employees in identifying policies, program and physical barriers to accessibility with the goal of developing solutions to ensure the opportunity for access to all individuals. This report and documents incorporated by reference and presented in the appendices establish the ADA Self Evaluation Report and Transition Plan for Lee County. This report is available online at It can be viewed with the assistance of font size enhancers and is compatible with screen readers and optical character recognition devices. On the website, it can be translated into other languages, digitally downloaded or printed. For assistance in obtaining a copy of Lee County s ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan in any reasonable format, contact Joan D. LaGuardia, ADA Coordinator, (239) , Florida Relay Service 711, or jlaguardia@leegov.com. Accommodation will be provided at no cost to the requestor. B. Designation of an ADA Coordinator 28 C.F.R (a) The ADA 28 C.F.R (a) requires a public entity with 50 or more employees to designate at least one employee to coordinate ADA compliance. Lee County has a designated ADA Coordinator who provides centralized oversight and coordination of ADA compliance with all departments and offices reporting to the Lee County Board of County Commissioners. The identity and contact information of the ADA Coordinator is included in notices of ADA policies and grievance procedure and in notices regarding requests for accommodation, posted for the public on the ADA page of the County's website, placed in frequently used publications, and provided to staff. Duties of the ADA Coordinator include: Validate County compliance with the ADA Title II; Coordinate investigation of ADA-related complaints; Oversee internal training and both internal and external communication regarding ADA rights and compliance; Assist departmental ADA initiatives and compliance; Oversee countywide self-evaluation and transition planning and implementation. January 24, 2017 Page 4

6 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan C. Notice of ADA Policy 28 C.F.R All public entities must provide information to interested parties regarding the ways in which Title II applies to its particular programs, services and activities, according to 28 C.F.R For all departments and offices reporting to the Lee County Board of County Commissioners, the County uses Department of Justice recommended formats for public notices which include, but are not limited to: Continual posting on the Lee County website ADA page ( NOTE: It can be viewed online with the assistance of font size enhancers and is compatible with screen readers and optical character recognition devices. On the website, it can be translated into other languages, digitally downloaded or printed. Continual posting on the Lee County website Legal Advertisements page ( Continual posting in all County building lobbies and public service areas; Routine posting in the Bulletin Board of LeeTV, the County s 24-hour government access channel airing on Comcast Cable Channel 97 and CenturyLink Prism Channel 88, and accessible online. In addition, an abbreviated notice of request for accommodations is included in advertisements for public hearings, meetings, programs and events. Three Lee County departments have additionally posted accessibility information particular to their service areas. These include Lee County Public Transit (LeeTran) information for Passport, a paratransit service; the Department of Information Technology s Website Policies and Notices; and the Department of Parks and Recreation ADA Notice. Notices and templates are in Appendix 1. D. Establish and Publish Grievance Procedures 28 C.F.R (b) Local governments with 50 or more employees must have a system for promptly and fairly resolving complaints of disability discrimination, according to 28 C.F.R (b). This mechanism is intended to resolve issues at the local rather than the federal level. Grievance issues for the general public are handled by Lee County s ADA Coordinator for all departments and offices reporting to the Lee County Board of County Commissioners. In addition, employee grievances are addressed through Human Resources Policies 201-Equal Employment Opportunity and 202-Workplace Harassment and through Standard Operating Procedures for ADA Interactive Process and Harassment/Discrimination The Notice of Grievance Procedure also uses the Department of Justice recommended format and is distributed to the public in the same methods outlined above for the Notice of ADA Policy. The Notice of Grievance Procedure is in Appendix 1. January 24, 2017 Page 5

7 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Section II Self-Evaluation January 24, 2017 Page 6

8 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan II. Self-Evaluation 28 C.F.R Lee County conducted its first mandated self-evaluation for ADA compliance to 28 C.F.R in the 1990s and has periodically reviewed it. From 2012 through 2016, County Administration again assessed its overall compliance for ADA policies, public notice and grievance procedures; physical accessibility to roads, mass transit and structures; and accessibility to all departmental services and programs. This included updates for the 2010 ADA revisions, particularly the Standards for Accessible Design and the 2012 Florida Accessibility Code. A. Physical Accessibility 28 C.F.R and Physical assessments were done for the departments of Transportation, Public Transit, and Facilities Construction and Management. 1. Transportation Evaluation of arterial and collector roads with an emphasis on intersections was completed with assistance from Atkins Traffic Engineering. Recommendations have been categorized into 21 priority groups. The Atkins Report finalized in February 2015 is in Appendix 2. The report is structured as follows: Project Area Development Reviews the development of the project area for the Lee County Department of Transportation Transition Plan. It also discloses how the project area was prioritized for the order of inspections; Final Project Area Presents the list of the final project area that was identified; Evaluation Criteria Documents the criteria that were identified to assess compliance of the project area with ADA accessibility; Data Collection Reviews the processes that were taken during field inspections as well as the quality control; GIS Database Summarizes the development of the geographic information system (GIS) database which is submitted electronically in conjunction with this report. In addition, Lee County received its Local Agency Program recertification in November 2016 from the Florida Department of Transportation, which included a review of ADA compliance by the Florida Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration Civil Rights Coordinator and State LAP Administrator. No deficiencies were noted and the County s transition plan for intersections was approved. 2. Transit (LeeTran) LeeTran provides more than 3 million rides per year as the County s public transit system. LeeTran s evaluation includes: Vehicles, stop locations and shelters serving 24 bus routes; Passport paratransit service, which the ADA mandates for transporting disabled persons to destinations within ¾ of a mile of fixed-route stops; January 24, 2017 Page 7

9 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Passport Premium Service, an additional, locally provided service for transporting the disabled to locations beyond the ¾ mile area; An employer vanpool program. Passport passenger trips are approximately 119,000 annually. Passport administrators reach out annually to approve disabled residents for the Passport program. These annual approvals range from 214,000 to 273,000, and interaction with these potential clients assists Passport managers to determine trends and needs. Passport vehicles cover more than 1 million miles annually. In its 2014 triennial review of LeeTran, the Federal Transit Administration cited no deficiencies for ADA compliance. All vehicles and service thresholds are ADA compliant. The next federal triennial review is in Therefore, LeeTran now focuses its self-evaluation and transition planning on stop locations and shelters. This ADA review dovetails with LeeTran s continuing Shelter Program, which identifies bus stop locations to improve amenities such as landing pads, shelters, bike racks, and trash receptacles. Stop locations which are part of the Shelter Program will be built to ADA standards and will have security lighting included as a part of the project. The stop location and shelter self-evaluation is in two categories: The evaluation of stop locations and shelter locations along the 24 bus routes; Assessment of major shelters that will be upgraded with grant funding as it becomes available. This includes the Rosa Parks Intermodal Center, where expansion options are being considered. 3. Facilities Physical compliance of all administration and service structures under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners is coordinated countywide by the Facilities Construction and Management Department. Lee County worked with ADA Consulting of Southwest Florida to evaluate approximately 120 structures, including offices, libraries, park structures, law enforcement and justice facilities. The ADA establishes requirements to ensure that buildings and facilities are accessible to and usable by people with disabilities. At a minimum, each facility was evaluated in these categories: Point of entry, which includes parking, sidewalks, doors, entry halls and other considerations; Access to service areas, which includes entry to service lobbies and offices, counters, auxiliary service-delivery areas, equipment and other considerations; Restrooms; Miscellaneous obstructions. Deficiencies were determined based on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design and the 2012 Florida Accessibility Code. Two county departments have specific programs for ADA structural improvements in addition to those generally handled by the facilities department: Libraries have targeted upgrades to self-checkout centers as a specific ADA project. Parks and Recreation routinely upgrades and maintains playground equipment and other customer service amenities to ensure ADA compliance. January 24, 2017 Page 8

10 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan B. Non-Structural Service and Program Accessibility 28 C.F.R Operating departments under the jurisdiction of the Lee County Board of County Commissioners were directed to evaluate their adherence to the County s ADA policies and access to their services and programs. The policies, service and program self-evaluation was conducted with a questionnaire. Results of this survey were reviewed by an internal working group, which was tasked with the broad examination of these Title II considerations: Physical barriers to access programs and services and the steps needed to enable accessibility, when viewed in their entirety; Policy modifications to provide access to individuals with disabilities and justifications for any exclusionary or limiting policies that will not be modified; Methods of communication with the public; Alternative communication methods and devices; Emergency evacuation techniques; Portrayal of individuals with disabilities in written and audio visual materials; Policies and methods to provide access to historic preservation programs; The rationale for making decisions that providing access poses an undue financial or administrative burden; Building and construction policies; Measures that have been made to familiarize staff with the policies and practices for providing full participation of individuals with disabilities; Ensuring that no practices limit participation by individuals based on drug usage. The County s ADA working group reviewed the questionnaires and other aspects of the countywide self-evaluation of policies, services and programs as well as the physical inventories of County structures and the County s transportation and mass transit networks. The questionnaire is in Appendix 2. In general, this comprehensive review assured County Administration that staff is working toward compliance, that accommodation needs are being routinely met by existing conditions and aids with few additional requests for accommodation, and that staff is working steadily toward the removal of remaining barriers to accessibility. In addition, the following specific categories were reviewed. 1. Subrecipient and Vendor Contracts Lee County requires vendors and contractors who are hired to offer County services to the public and subrecipients of County grants to comply with the ADA. Self-evaluation included a review of those contracts and an update of applicable contract language. The language can be viewed in Appendix Communication/Training 28 C.F.R January 24, 2017 Page 9

11 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan a. Telephone Service Hearing impaired persons may contact the County through the Florida Relay Service at 711. The service provides specially trained operators to relay telephone conversations between people who are deaf, hard of hearing, or speech disabled and Lee County s customer service staff. The computerized telephone system installed in the Lee County Public Safety Communications automatically recognizes a teletypewriter (TTY) call, and the and dispatch personnel are trained to answer emergency calls from persons who are hearing and/or speech impaired. b. Website Adaptations for customer access via the Internet have focused on: Ensuring that the Lee County website is compatible to the technology and equipment most frequently used by persons who have adapted their personal computers or use other smart devices to accommodate their disabilities; Ensuring that the design of the Lee County website is consistent with the best practices for accommodating users with disabilities; Ensuring that public access terminals, particularly in libraries, are updated with Microsoft Windows 7, which offers these accessibility features: o o o o Magnifier, to make items on the screen appear bigger; On-screen keyboard, to allow entry without using a keyboard; Narrator, which allows the user to hear text read aloud; Use of speech recognition; Ensuring that departmental webmasters and content managers are trained in the County s ADA accessibility standards, which include: o o o Images on the website contain "alt tags" to help users with screen readers listen to the content. A "skip to" link allows these users to bypass the header and go directly to the main content each time a page is accessed; Users can get information regarding the accessibility of Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files from the Adobe website To improve the accessibility of our website, Lee County Government reviews the site's accessibility with outside web tools and periodically will ask users with disabilities to review the site. Adjustments are then made as necessary. Approximately 350 employees have been trained to post documents online in accessible formats. Questions or grievances about the website are directed to the Website Content Coordinator, who welcomes comments on how to improve the site's accessibility for users with disabilities and works in conjunction with the County s ADA coordinator. Lee County s Website Policies and Notice, Website Standards and Guidelines for webmasters and content managers, and the Accessibility in Windows 7 users guide are in Appendix Public hearings/meetings January 24, 2017 Page 10

12 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan a. Board of County Commissioners Sites used for public hearings and meetings were inspected and deemed structurally accessible or accessible with non-structural modifications. Lee County contracts with American Sign Language interpreters and verbal language interpreters for those who request accommodations during a meeting. Meetings and public hearings in the Board of County Commissioners Chambers are televised on local cable and streamed live online. Closed captioning is provided live by The Captioning Group. Audio/video recordings in MP3 format are available online immediately after the event. Transcripts in OCR-accessible PDF format are available online within two weeks. Requests to have recordings downloaded to disk or thumb drive are honored. Personal hearing devices receiving a feed from the chamber s audio system are also available on request for the hard-of-hearing. b. Hearing Examiner Public hearings in the Hearing Examiner chambers have audio recordings in MP3 format. Staff summaries or transcripts prepared by court reporters are available online in OCR-accessible PDF format. Requests to have recordings downloaded to disk or thumb drive are honored. In 2016, the County expanded the availability of personal hearing devices for the hard of hearing in the Hearing Examiner s meeting room. 4. Alternate Delivery of Services The departmental self-evaluation surveys assured Staff that the departments are offering new, alternative service delivery including, for example: The Library Department is installing accessible self-checkout kiosks; The Library Department manages a program for home-delivery of printed and audio books; The Technology Services department has trained departmental web masters to meet evolving website accessibility standards. 5. Public Safety Lee County meets accessibility standards for: Emergency Services Dispatching; Ambulance services; Emergency management notices and warnings through its accessible website and through Code Red, an emergency notification process that allows residents to sign up for preferred methods of notification to personal smart devices; Lee County hosts a Special Needs Shelter for disabled persons during evacuations. The Public Safety Department has formed a Disability Working Group to specifically collaborate with community advocates on ADA issues regarding emergency services. Recent project goals are creating a disability Appendix to the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans (CEMP) and devoting specific information for the ADA-qualified community in the All Hazards Guide. 6. Language Assistance Lee County also complies with Executive Order (E.O.) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act January 24, 2017 Page 11

13 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan of 1964 providing that no person shall be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin under any program or activity that receives federal financial assistance, including the Title VI prohibition against discrimination affecting Limited English Proficient (LEP) Persons. A Limited English Proficiency (LEP) person is one who does not speak English as their primary language and who has a limited ability to read, speak, write, or understand English. Lee County takes reasonable steps to ensure that persons with Limited English Proficiency have timely meaningful access and an equal opportunity to participate in services and benefits. Using U.S. Census material and statistics from the Lee County School System, the County annually assesses the languages spoken by LEP persons within our service area and the number of LEP persons who are eligible for the services, and then supply appropriate language assistance according to guidelines. Based on its assessments and these guidelines, the County makes arrangements to access appropriate interpreters and translation services, including joining in the State of Florida contract for Language Line Services. Agreements usually cover language interpreters for Spanish, German, Danish, French, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Swedish and Ukrainian. These interpreters can be reached on call by telephone in emergency situations or their assistance can be requested in advance. Lee County s LEP Plan is in Appendix 1. C. Public Input Lee County continually invites interested persons to evaluate the accessibility of County services, programs and facilities through these outreaches: Submitting comments through the ADA page on its Website; Responding to the invitation to request accommodations that is part of legally advertised meetings and public hearings; Participating in annual Passport/LeeTran outreach to approve disabled residents for the Passport program; Lee County staff s regular attendance at meetings of the ADA Advisory Council of Southwest Florida and other advocacy groups; Lee County Emergency Management hosting of the Disability Working Group. For the 2016 self-evaluation update, Lee County added two additional public outreaches: A special presentation by the Lee County ADA Coordinator to the ADA Advisory Council of Southwest Florida to update them on progress of the self-evaluation and to specifically receive input on planning a public open house to discuss accessibility; An open house scheduled for one-on-one input from the community with the County ADA Coordinator and representatives of key departments including transportation, transit (LeeTran and Passport), facilities, parks and recreation, and libraries. D. Records Retention Lee County not only complies with ADA requirements for retaining self-evaluation and transition plan records for a minimum of three years, but also complies with Florida Statute Chapter 119, which regulates access to public records and requires that all documents relating to selfevaluation of ADA compliance be available for public review. For assistance in obtaining records related to Lee County s ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan, contact Joan D. LaGuardia, ADA Coordinator, (239) , Florida Relay Service 711, January 24, 2017 Page 12

14 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan or Accommodation will be provided at no cost to the requestor. In concluding this Self-Evaluation section, the County notes that this survey process also revealed the need for action items that will be undertaken in FY17 and FY18, including formalizing staff compliance through Standard Operating Procedures, staff training, reaching out to the community for input, and discussing possible revisions to budgeting for the ADA transition plan. The Action Plan is detailed in Section IV of this report. January 24, 2017 Page 13

15 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Section III Transition Plan January 24, 2017 Page 14

16 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan III. Transition Plan 28 C.F.R (d) Lee County s evolving transition plan addresses remaining structural accessibility issues that were identified through its self-evaluation process. To comply with ADA requirements for an acceptable Transition Plan, Lee County has compiled: Lists of the physical barriers that limit the accessibility to programs, activities or services for individuals with disabilities; An explanation of the approach used to prioritize removal of these barriers according to ADA Accessibility Guidelines, federal and state transportation guidelines, and Lee County s established planning for capital improvement, major maintenance projects, and ADA-specific line items in departmental budgets; Goals for achieving compliance, including project lists with target dates and costs; Demonstration of opportunities for input from ADA-qualified residents; Identification of Glen Salyer, Assistant County Manager, as the official responsible for implementation of the plan. This Transition Plan represents the remedies that are most likely to be undertaken in FY17 and FY18. The order in which these projects are completed may be altered by the emergence of newly discovered safety considerations, public requests, availability of funds and emerging efficiencies of grouping projects and buying materials. It is also important to note that significant progress toward improved accessibility begins with Lee County s ongoing Capital Improvement and Major Maintenance planning. Lee County addresses ADA deficiencies at intersections and bus stops as roads are resurfaced or otherwise improved. Structural barriers are addressed in expansions and remodels. Therefore, the primary factors for moving a project from the comprehensive list of needed remedies to the Transition Plan for a specific fiscal year are: Scheduling in current CIP and major maintenance planning and budgeting; Fiscal year departmental budgeting for ADA-specific projects; Departmental prioritization methodologies. Lee County s Transition Plan includes separate project lists for transportation, transit and facilities. The Transition Plan has been developed according to the prioritization methodologies explained below. A. Transportation Lee County s Transportation Transition Plan was completed in two phases. In the first phase, Lee County worked with consultant Atkins to process the results of the inventory of arterial and collector roadways and intersections into 21 prioritized groups of projects. Atkins developed its methodology from the following documents: 2010 Standards for Accessible Design, Department of Justice; Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices; Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines; DOT s ADA Standards for Transportation Facilities 2006; Section 400 (curb ramps); January 24, 2017 Page 15

17 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Section 705 (detectable warnings). Various scenarios of ADA deficiencies for curb ramps and cross walks were identified and prioritized by their degree of severity, as shown in Table 1 Prioritization of Types of Deficiencies on p. 69 of the Atkins report and by their type of ADA deficiency, as shown in Table 2 Types of ADA Deficiencies on p. 71 of the Atkins report. Every deficiency had a value associated with it. Priority 1-5 was ranked highest because they had the greatest value of overall deficiency. Any inspected intersection that required attention was listed within 21 priority categories. Both tables and the resulting Priority 1-5, 5-10, and project lists can be viewed in the Atkins Report in Appendix 2 Self-Evaluation. In the second phase, Lee County reviewed these lists with its existing policies, budgets, project lists and funding allocations, including: Lee County s overall practice that all transportation improvements include bringing intersections into full ADA compliance; The existing multi-year plan for Transportation Capital Improvement Projects approved by Lee County Commissioners and the Lee County Metropolitan Planning Organization; The existing budget for Transportation Major Maintenance Projects approved by Lee County Commissioners; Allocation of an additional $250,000 specifically for ADA improvements in FY17 according to these general guidelines: o o o Allocate approximately $150,000 to be used on the top-rated ADA non-compliant intersections identified in the Atkins report; Allocate approximately $50,000 to repave arterial/collector intersections identified in the Atkins report; Allocate approximately $50,000 to respond to ADA-specific requests with any year-end remainder to be reallocated to the top-rated intersection in the Adkins ADA Arterial and Collector study that can be completed with the money available. 1. Cost Consideration Costs associated with the transportation transition plan include these sources for allocation: $250,000, as outlined above, is funded through gas taxes for ADA-specific projects in the transition plan for FY17. It is anticipated that this amount will also be budgeted in FY18; $3.9 million is allocated for DOT Bicycle and Pedestrian facilities in FY17 and $2.6 million in FY18; these will be done to ADA standards. These are paid for through gas tax and impact fee funds; $15.5 million is allocated in FY17 and $30.0 million in FY18 for CIP projects, which will be completed to ADA standards and which will include intersection improvements that address projects in the transition plan. These are paid for through gas tax and impact fee funds; $1.1 million for FY17 & $1.1 million in FY18 for major intersection improvement, which includes some of the intersections identified in the transition plan. These are paid for through gas tax and impact fee funds. 2. Target Timeline Looking initially at the Priority 1-5 list and noting which projects are already earmarked for January 24, 2017 Page 16

18 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan completion in current CIP and maintenance programs, Lee County has committed to addressing the remaining Priority 1-5 projects which can reasonably be addressed within FY17 and FY18. There are six projects for which engineering design services will be done in FY17 with work to be offered for bid in FY17. An additional 10 projects are targeted to have engineering design services done in FY17 with work to be offered for bid in FY18. Through FY21, there are 53 projects on the transition plan list. Costs for these projects will be entered into the transition plan project list/spreadsheet as the design services are completed. A construction estimate will be completed with the design, and projects will be programmed with the available funds. Lee County will continue through the priority list on a yearly basis as funds are available. B. Transit (LeeTran) Lee County Transit has a Shelter Program that aimed to upgrade approximately six shelters annually from 2010 through Shelters targeted in the program go through two phases of planning. The first is site design, which includes the investigation of existing right-of-way, and the second phase is site construction. Due to budget cuts through the recession and County Administration interest in evaluating the shelter program with new criteria including increased focus on ADA guidelines this program is being substantially refined in During FY17, County Administration will reassign the shelter projects according to these criteria: Requests from the mobility-impaired community and the public in general; Scheduling of projects that are not functionally accessible due to obstructions; Scheduling of projects that are functionally accessible but may not meet all ADA requirements of accessibility; Number passenger trips recorded at that stop location; Synergies with other County projects, especially road and sidewalks repairs. Several stop location/shelter projects, which are through Phase 1 site design and ready for permitting, are on the FY17 LeeTran plan. However, the focus of FY17 will be to propose a new capital improvement plan for stop locations for FY18 funding, to begin the request for proposal and contracting work for stop locations already through the design phase and to complete the transition plan for LeeTran stop locations through Selection of appropriate standards and criteria for design includes the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance, February 2003 and is influenced by several factors, which may include but is not limited to traffic volume, composition, policies and regulations, terrain features, surrounding developments, existing conditions, and budgetary constraints. Each year, LeeTran will review the system as a whole to ensure that emerging needs from the ADA community, changing passenger trip statistics and public input are reflected in the selection of projects in the transition plan. 1. Cost Consideration LeeTran has prioritized approximately $1.2 million in existing federal grants for passenger amenities. Historic Lee County Transit spending in its Shelter Program has equated to an average cost of $25,000 per site. However, based on topology, design or construction difficulties, or additional permitting requirements based on location specific issues, costs will vary. January 24, 2017 Page 17

19 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan 2. Target Timeline During FY17, Lee County will investigate approximately 15 stop location projects for design review and/or permitting. C. Facilities Primary placement of projects on the Facilities plan is determined by Capital Improvement and Major Maintenance budgeting not only for the facilities department but also for the operating departments. For FY17, the department is phasing in a new Transition Plan methodology based on the updated self-evaluation inspections to determine the priority of projects not addressed by CIP and Major Maintenance planning. This new system is based on three categories of weighted criteria to determine the importance of removing structural deficiencies and the timing of corrections: The necessity of the structure in providing direct customer-service for vital, tax-supported services: o Tier 1 service centers are open to the public and perform vital, tax-supported services. These are given a weight of 5. Examples of these buildings are the Old Courthouse, the Community Development/Public Works Center, the Melvin Morgan Constitutional Complex and the Lee County Justice Center. o Tier II service centers are open to the public and provide important, tax-supported services. These are given a weight of 4. Examples include libraries, community centers, and satellite centers and annexes to the Tier I structures. o Tier III recreational and entertainment structures open to the public are given a weight 3. Examples include park facilities, sports facilities and beach facilities. o Tier IV structures are operations facilities and structures which are not open to the public. These are assigned a weight of 2. Examples include emergency operations and public safety facilities, solid waste facilities, and water treatment and distribution facilities. ADA Accessibility Guidelines prioritization: o Priority 1 projects improve accessibility of approach and entrance and are given a weight of 5; o Priority 2 improve access to services and goods and are given a weight of 4; o Priority 3 improve access to public toilet rooms and are given a weight of 3; o Priority 4 improve access to ancillary items including water fountains and public telephones and are given a weight of 2. Subjective departmental considerations, including immediate safety concerns, public requests, and efficiencies in grouping work orders and buying parts and materials. These are decided by the department s director, manager of public works projects and the County s ADA coordinator. These may include work needed to accommodate employees, respond to public requests, and a variety of other considerations, including efficiencies in grouping work orders and buying parts and materials. In the worksheet, these are justified by notes and assigned subjective weights up to 10 points. These subjective considerations may also include a negative weight. For example, points could be subtracted from a low-priority but January 24, 2017 Page 18

20 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan high-cost project to keep it from delaying multiple projects of equal weight due to scarce funding resources. For FY17 and FY18, the top three areas of structural projects for Lee County are Lee Civic Center renovations; updates to a variety of Parks and Recreation facilities, including restrooms and boat ramps; and updates at libraries to make self-checkout fully accessible to the disabled. 1. Cost Consideration As new County facilities have been constructed or existing buildings remodeled, Lee County has complied with State of Florida design requirements through review by the Florida Department of Professional Regulation. The department estimates that 8% of Capital Improvement and Major Maintenance spending has been for ADA compliance. ADA projects that will be addressed through the CIP and major maintenance budgets appear on the Transition Plan for FY17 and FY18. These budgets are funded by ad valorem taxes through the general fund, library fund and municipal services taxing unit, by utilities and solid waste enterprise funds, and by tourist development (bed) tax. For FY17, the department s budget includes a $7,700 line item for ADA enhancements not funded through the CIP or major maintenance budgets. For FY17, most of this is allocated to inspections. Lee County has spent $2.2 million from FY02 through FY16 on ADA-specific projects to upgrade or replace structures to conform to ADA requirements. 2. Target Timeline As part of its FY17 Transition Plan, the department will complete the weighted evaluations. Because the department is phasing in this new methodology, the FY17 transition plan includes only the projects which will remedy ADA issues associated with the FY17 and FY18 CIP and Major Maintenance projects. January 24, 2017 Page 19

21 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Section IV Action Plan January 24, 2017 Page 20

22 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan IV. Action Plan ADA compliance is a complex process that is best achieved through coordinated plans that are periodically updated. In addition to the Transition Plan for structural accessibility, Lee County has identified an Action Plan of specific steps to enhance its compliance to policy requirements and service/program accessibility. These include implementation of policies and procedures, training and community outreach. No priority methodology is required; all will be accomplished in FY17 and FY18, which is the target period for this most recent review of the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan. # Action Detail Task Manager 1 Review existing contracts with ADA service providers including American Sign Language and verbal language translators; review ADA language in Facilities Construction and Management scopes, RFPs and contracts. ADA Coordinator/Procurement 2 Establish Standard Operating Procedures for staff handling of ADA notices of Lee County policies, grievance procedure, and accommodations; for recording and handling requests for accommodation and grievances; guidelines for service animals and comfort animals; and training. ADA Coordinator/Senior Team 3 Welcome input from the ADA community and the public during a public open house to allow one-on-one feedback from the public with untimed access to staff. ADA Coordinator/ADA Specialists 4 Train reception, customer service staff and marketing/advertising staff. Compile an FAQ to assist staff with common questions. ADA Coordinator/Director, Talent Development 5 Review budgeting issues for ADA-specific projects. Senior Team 6 Provide ½ day onsite training by an outside consultant for the Lee County ADA Coordinator, key mangers, and departmental ADA coordinators. ADA Coordinator Additional Direct Cost None None None TBD Budget process Target Timeline FY17 Quarter 2 FY17 Quarter 2 FY17 Quarter 2 FY17 Quarter 3 FY17 Quarter 2 and 3 $400 FY17 Quarter 2 January 24, 2017 Page 21

23 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan # Action Detail Task Manager 7 During the Risk Management updating of Administrative Code 7-2: The Employee Emergency Action Plan, practices for emergency evacuation of ADA-qualified employees and customers will be reviewed. Risk Management 8 Design an online-based training program for reception and customer service staff, marketing and advertising, webmasters and online content managers. ADA Coordinator/Director, Talent Development Additional Direct Cost None TBD Budget process Target Timeline FY17 Quarter 4 FY18 Quarter 1 January 24, 2017 Page 22

24 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Section V Appendices January 24, 2017 Page 23

25 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan V. Appendices Appendix 1 Policies and Procedure A. Notice of ADA Policy LEE COUNTY NOTICE UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( ADA ), Lee County, Florida ( Lee County ) will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities. Employment: Lee County does not discriminate on the basis of disability in its hiring or employment practices and complies with all regulations promulgated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under Title I of the ADA. Effective Communication: Lee County will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities so they can participate equally in Lee County s programs, services, and activities, including qualified sign language interpreters, documents in Braille, and other ways of making information and communications accessible to people who have speech, hearing, or vision impairments. Modifications to Policies and Procedures: Lee County will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all of its programs, services, and activities. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to participate in a program, service, or activity of Lee County, should contact the office of Joan LaGuardia, (239) , Florida Relay Service 711, or jlaguardia@leegov.com as soon as possible but no later than five (5) business days before the scheduled event. The ADA does not require Lee County to take any action that would fundamentally alter the nature of its programs or services, or impose an undue financial or administrative burden. Complaints that a program, service, or activity of Lee County is not accessible to persons with disabilities should be directed to Joan LaGuardia, (239) , Florida Relay Service 711, or jlaguardia@leegov.com. Lee County will not place a surcharge on a particular individual with a disability or any group of individuals with disabilities to cover the cost of providing auxiliary aids/services or reasonable modifications of policies, such as retrieving items from locations that are open to the public but are not accessible to persons who use wheelchairs. January 24, 2017 Page 24

26 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan B. Public Notice of Grievance Procedure LEE COUNTY Grievance Procedure under the Americans with Disabilities Act This Grievance Procedure is established to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( ADA ). It may be used by anyone who wishes to file a complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the provision of services, activities, programs, or benefits by Lee County, Florida ( Lee County ). Lee County s Personnel Policies and Procedures govern employment-related complaints of disability discrimination by Lee County employees. Any complaint by a member of the public alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the provision of services, activities, programs, or benefits by Lee County should be in writing and contain information about the alleged discrimination such as name, address, phone number of complainant and location, date, and description of the problem. Alternative means of filing complaints, such as personal interviews or a tape recording of the complaint, will be made available for persons with disabilities upon request. The complaint should be submitted by the grievant and/or his/her designee as soon as possible but no later than 60 calendar days after the alleged violation to: Joan D. LaGuardia, ADA Coordinator Lee County Manager s Office 2115 Second Street P.O. Box 398 Fort Myers, FL (239) , Florida Relay Service 711 jlaguardia@leegov.com Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the complaint, Lee County s ADA Coordinator or his/her designee will meet with the complainant to discuss the complaint and the possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days of the meeting, the ADA Coordinator or his/her designee will respond in writing, and where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, such as large print, Braille, or audio tape. The response will explain the position of Lee County and offer options for substantive resolution of the complaint. If the response by the ADA Coordinator or his/her designee does not satisfactorily resolve the issue, the complainant and/or his/her designee may appeal the decision within 15 calendar days after receipt of the response to the County Manager or other appropriate high-level official designated by Lee County, or his/her designee. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the appeal, the County Manager or other Lee County official or his/her designee will meet with the complainant to discuss the complaint and possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days after the meeting, the County Manager or other Lee County official or his/her designee will respond in writing, and, where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, with a final resolution of the complaint. All written complaints received by Lee County s ADA Coordinator or his/her designee, appeals to the County Manager or other appropriate high-level official or his/her designee, and responses from these two offices will be retained by Lee County for at least three (3) years. January 24, 2017 Page 25

27 LEE COUNTY RECOMMENDED WORDING OF NOTICE OF ACCOMMODATION In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Lee County will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities in its services, programs, or activities. To request an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication or a reasonable modification to participate, contact Joan LaGuardia, (239) , Florida Relay Service 711, or jlaguardia@leegov.com. Accommodation will be provided at no cost to the requestor. Requests should be made at least five business days in advance. NOTE: Departments with ADA specialists should substitute their departmental contact. RECOMMENDED WORDING FOR PAID LEGAL ADVERTISING Lee County will not discriminate against individuals with disabilities. To request an accommodation, contact Joan LaGuardia, (239) , Florida Relay Service 711, or jlaguardia@leegov.com, at least five business days in advance.

28 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan D. Title VI LEP Plan Section I I. Purpose Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000(d) et seq.; Executive Order 13166; and the U.S. Department of Labor Revised Guidance Regarding the Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient (LEP) Persons are guidelines that apply to all departments and offices reporting to the Lee County Board of County Commissioners, their contractors and subcontractors, and other agents who receive federal or state financial assistance for their programs and services. II. Policy All departments and offices reporting to the Lee County Board of County Commissioners will comply with these guidelines to take reasonable steps to ensure that persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) have timely, meaningful access and an equal opportunity to participate in services and benefits provided by the County. Through its Language Access Plan, Lee County will accomplish these goals: Annually assess target audiences for LEP services; Ensure meaningful verbal communication with LEP persons and their authorized representatives; Communicate information contained in vital documents; Provide ADA compliant interpretation services at no cost to the person being served; Inform LEP persons of these services and their right to access them free of charge; Accommodate public input from the LEP community; Manage this plan routinely to ensure continuing compliance. Definition: A Limited English Proficiency (LEP) person is one who does not speak English as their primary language and who has a limited ability to read, speak, write, or understand English. III. Plan Development IV. This plan was developed through analysis of four factors: The number or proportion of eligible LEP persons in the Lee County service area; The frequency with which LEP individuals come in contact with County service providers; The nature and importance of the program, activity or service provided to the LEP population; and Available resources and overall costs to provide LEP assistance. Plan Procedure Annually Assess the Proportion of LEP Persons Eligible to be Served Using U.S. Census Data, including the American Community Survey; statistics from the Lee County School System; Lee County Community Development and Lee County GIS resources; and other sources, the Lee County ADA Coordinator will annually assess the languages spoken by LEP persons within Lee County and the number of LEP persons who are eligible for the January 24, 2017 Page 27

29 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan services. The Lee County ADA coordinator will ensure distribution of the information among all County departments, including Transportation, Human Services and Public Transportation (LeeTran) and will update the LEP Plan or translator services contracts if needed. Record the Frequency of LEP Service Requests Lee County acknowledges its responsibility to continually record the frequency by which LEP individuals come in contact with Lee County programs, services, or activities. Operations departments and offices will record contacts with LEP persons in order to determine the frequency of contact with customers who do not speak English as their primary language and who have a limited ability to read, speak, write, or understand English. The more frequent the contact and/or the number of associated requests for alternate format(s) for languages other than English, as self-identified by applicants and participants in its programs, the more likely that language services for a specific language group will be needed. Measures necessary for a program that serves a person with LEP one time or occasionally will necessarily be different from those that serve persons with LEP every day. While less frequent contact suggests a different, less intense solution, some services may still be necessary for times when a LEP person occasionally seeks services. Provide Notice Lee County will inform LEP persons that the County will provide them with language assistance at no charge to them. Written notice will be provided on the Lee County website, which has compliant language translation options for its content; by posting notices at appropriate points of service and points of entry; and by including references to LEP rights and services in public notices. LEP persons are encouraged through these public notices to request translator services and to provide input at public meetings. Provide Language Assistance Lee County will take reasonable steps to assure that LEP persons receive the language assistance necessary for meaningful access to our programs and services, both verbal and in the communication of written information contained in written documents to accomplish these goals: Identify the initial point of contact and subsequent points of contact with LEP persons where language assistance is likely to be needed. Provide a method or methods at the initial point of contact to notify LEP persons that: o o o Upon request, they are offered language assistance; They will not be personally charged for the cost of language assistance; They will not be personally charged for the cost translating vital documents. Based on its assessments and these guidelines, Lee County will make arrangements to access appropriate interpreters and translation services. The Lee County Visitor & Convention Bureau will be the contracting agent for general LEP translation services available to departments countywide. However, departments with particular needs, such as Human Services for compliance of HUD requirements, may engage their own translation services. The language needs, the resources to provide effective language, and the arrangements to access these resources in a timely fashion shall be promptly determined and prominently displayed for future reference. These arrangements may include the use of: o o A list of interpreters who have agreements with multiple Lee County departments, A list of bilingual staff, January 24, 2017 Page 28

30 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan o o Online resources, such as Google translate, Translators personally selected by LEP persons, but only under these conditions: This option is specifically requested by the LEP person; The LEP person understands that Lee County will provide an interpreter at no charge; The LEP person understands that Lee County is not responsible for any fees or charges owed to the interpreter, and the LEP person must pay those fees or charges at their own expense; Lee County does not object to the use of the personally selected translator due to concerns about competency of interpretation, confidentiality, privacy, and/or conflict of interest. The LEP person s election of this choice would be documented. When written translation of vital documents is needed, each program area will submit documents to either Lee County s ADA Coordinator or the appointed departmental staff person who retains translated versions of important documents Safe Harbor Provisions In consideration of HUD and other federal assistance programs, Lee County acknowledges these guidelines for safe harbor, meaning that written translations provided under these circumstances will be considered strong evidence of compliance. There are two safe harbor provisions: o o V. Monitoring The recipient provides written translations of vital documents for each eligible LEP language group that constitutes five percent or 1,000, whichever is less, of the population of persons eligible to be served or likely to be affected or encountered. Translation of other documents, if needed, can be provided orally; or If there are fewer than 50 persons in a language group that reaches the five percent trigger in (a), the recipient does not translate vital written materials but instead provides written notice in the primary language of the LEP language group of the right to receive competent oral interpretation of those written materials at no charge to the requestor. Lee County will monitor and periodically evaluate the Language Access Plan and the County s compliance. At a minimum, the overall monitoring program will determine whether: Contractors hired to provide County services or Lee County grant subrecipients comply with Title VI; Existing language assistance is meeting LEP persons needs; Staff is trained in current LEP policies; Resources and arrangements for assisting LEP persons are still current and viable. January 24, 2017 Page 29

31 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Appendix 2 Self-Evaluation A. ADA Self-Evaluation Questionnaire LEE COUNTY 504/ADA TITLE II/ADAAA SELF-EVALUATION OF POLICY, SERVICE AND PROGRAM COMPLIANCE 504/ADA Self-Evaluation Questionnaire Form This form will help you evaluate your department s policies, services, and programs to ensure that they are accessible to people with disabilities. This self-evaluation process coincides with a new Department of Justice rule that becomes effective Oct. 11, That new rule results from the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA). It furthers the intention of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (504), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). This questionnaire is part of a comprehensive update of the County s transition plan for ADA compliance. Note that this survey focuses on policies and access to services and programs. The County has conducted separate surveys for transportation issues (roads and intersections, curbs, sidewalks), mass transit and physical structural issues (parking lots and entrances, physical barriers to points of service, restrooms). If you have questions regarding this process, or if you require this material in an alternate format, please contact Joan LaGuardia, ADA coordinator, or jlaguardia@leegov.com. Identification General Policy Yes No NA 1. Does your staff fully understand the County policy of nondiscrimination on the basis of disability and take appropriate steps to facilitate participation of ADA-qualified individuals in services and programs? 2. A. Is your staff aware of the County s 504/ADA Coordinator? 2. B. Is your staff aware that County Administration will handle your requests for accommodation or ADA-related grievances? 2. C. Does your department also have a specialist for ADA issues? If so, please identify: January 24, 2017 Page 30

32 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan 3. Have you received requests for accommodation from ADA-qualified individuals in the past 12 months? Explain your standard operating procedure for handling accommodation requests. 4. A. Is your staff aware of the County s 504/ADA grievance procedure? 4. B. Do you have a process for receiving ADA-related grievances, logging them and referring them to the County ADA Coordinator for processing? Explain your standard operating procedure for handling grievance requests. List the grievances you have referred in the past 12 months. 5. Are Lee County s public notices of ADA rights and grievance procedure posted in your main service areas, major publications and in a method accessible to all members of the public? 6. Does anyone on your staff routinely attend ADA-related training, events or meetings not sponsored by Lee County or regularly interact with a disability rights group to assist with recognizing accessibility issues and finding solutions? If yes, identify the employee and briefly explain the activity. 7. How can Lee County Administration assist you further in accomplishing ADA compliance? Access to Departmental Service and Programs 1. Do you notify the public and other interested parties that your department s meetings, hearings, programs and other events will be held in accessible locations and that accommodations and auxiliary aids will be provided at no charge to ADA-qualified requestors? Explain your notification outreach and attach samples. 2. Is information about your department s services or programs available on request in alternate formats for people who have disabilities? 3. Is your staff aware of the procedure for safe emergency evacuation of people with disabilities from your facility(ies)? 4. Do you apply and enforce regulations, rules, programs, awards and all other practices to allow full participation of individuals with disabilities? 5.A. Have you reviewed your policies and practices for the possibility of direct or indirect effect of excluding or limiting the participation of individuals with disabilities? 5.B. If there is a possibility for direct or indirect exclusion, how will you alter or eliminate those policies or practices? Yes No NA January 24, 2017 Page 31

33 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan 6. Do you ensure that regulations, rules, programs, awards and all other practices do not limit participation by individuals who are recovering from past drug or alcohol usage? 7.A. Are you aware of any programmatic barriers that prevent ADA-qualified members of the public from participating in your services and programs? 7.B. If yes, are you working with County Administration to prioritize a longterm solution? 7.C. Are you using non-structural modifications and programmatic alternatives to enable ADA-qualified individuals to receive services and participate in programs? 7. D. Do those options require ADA-qualified individuals to be served or located in segregated areas of your facility? 7. E. Do those options require ADA-qualified individuals to receive services or participate in programs at an alternate location? 8. A. Do you advertise or market your services or programs in venues or media other than the County website, legal advertisements, or standard County outreach? 8. B. If yes, do you ensure that this communication is accessible to ADAqualified individuals? C. Do you ensure that this communication portrays persons with disabilities in an appropriate manner? Departmental ADA Planning Yes No NA 1. Are you aware that the County has an ADA Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan? 2. Do you have any ADA-specific departmental priorities or compliance targets or projects in addition to County Administration s? If so, explain: 3. In the past 12 months, have you submitted any ADA or civil-rights related compliance forms to qualify for state or federal grants or programs? List them: 4. Does your department have ADA accessibility issues related to historic properties or historic preservation programs? If yes, identify the historic property, the accessibility issue and options for solutions. 5. Do you have concerns that a specific action to address ADA compliance will fundamentally alter the nature of a program or present an undue financial or administrative burden? If yes, explain. January 24, 2017 Page 32

34 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Compliance of Subrecipients Yes No NA 1. A. Are you a pass-through agency for any Federal or State grants or do you contract with any service providers to conduct programs or activities on behalf of your department? 1. B. Do you verify that subrecipients and service contractors are aware of their obligation for ADA compliance? January 24, 2017 Page 33

35 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan B. ADA County Contractor and Subrecipient Contract Notice STANDARD BID DOCUMENT AND CONTRACT REFERENCE Name of Form: Statutory Reference: Instructions Reference: Description: MANDATORY LANGUAGE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C et seq.) Statutory and Other Requirements The Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities in all services, programs and activities provided or made available by public entities. The federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 requires bid specifications and contracts to contain language that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities in all services, programs and activities provided or made available by public entities. APPENDIX A AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 Equal Opportunity for Individuals with Disability The contractor and Lee County, Florida (hereafter the County ) do hereby agree that the provisions of Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "Act") (42 U.S.C et seq.), as amended, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities in all services, programs, and activities provided or made available by public entities, and the rules and regulations promulgated under the Act, are made a part of this contract. In providing any aid, benefit, or service on behalf of the County pursuant to this contract, the contractor agrees that its performance shall be in strict compliance with the Act. In the event that the contractor, its agents, servants, employees, or subcontractors violate or are alleged to have violated the Act during the performance of this contract, the contractor shall defend the County in any action or administrative proceeding that is filed under this Act. The contractor shall indemnify, protect, and save harmless the County, its agents, servants, and employees from and against any and all suits, claims, losses, demands, or damages, of whatever kind or nature arising out of or claimed to arise out of the alleged violation. The contractor shall, at its own expense, appear, defend, and pay all fees for legal services and all costs and other expenses arising from or incurred in connection with such action or administrative proceeding. In all complaints brought under the County s grievance procedure, the contractor agrees to abide by the County s decision. If any action or administrative proceeding results in an award of damages against the County, or if the January 24, 2017 Page 34

36 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan County incurs any expense to cure a violation of the ADA that has been brought under its grievance procedure, the contractor shall satisfy and discharge the same at its own expense. The County shall, as soon as practicable after a claim has been made against it, give written notice to the contractor along with full and complete particulars of the claim. If any action or administrative proceeding is brought against the County or any of its agents, servants, and employees, the County shall expeditiously forward or have forwarded to the contractor every demand, complaint, notice, summons, pleading, or other process received by the County or its representatives. It is expressly agreed and understood that any approval by the County of the services provided by the contractor pursuant to this contract will not relieve the contractor of the obligation to comply with the Act and to defend, indemnify, protect, and save harmless the County pursuant to this paragraph. It is further agreed and understood that the County assumes no obligation to indemnify or save harmless the contractor, its agents, servants, employees and subcontractors for any claim which may arise out of their performance of obligations under this Agreement. Furthermore, the contractor expressly understands and agrees that the provisions of this indemnification clause shall in no way limit the contractor s obligations assumed in this Agreement, nor shall they be construed to relieve the contractor from any liability, nor preclude the County from taking any other actions available to it under any other provisions of the Agreement or otherwise at law. January 24, 2017 Page 35

37 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan C. Website ADA Policies and Notices 11/10/2016 Website Policies & Notices Website Mission To provide the public with accurate, ADA-compliant information about the Lee County Board of County Commissioners and its underlying departments, using plain language and user-friendly navigation to improve communication and transparency; increase user satisfaction; and simplify the completion of self-service tasks. View our website help video for navigation tips. Accessibility Lee County Government is committed to the spirit of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). We strive to ensure that people with disabilities can access our services, participate in our programs and benefit from our community resources. Accommodations are available upon request. This website includes several features designed to improve accessibility for users with disabilities: Images on the website contain "alt tags" to help users with screen readers listen to the content. A "skip to" link allows these users to bypass the header and go directly to the main content each time a page is accessed. Users can get information regarding the accessibility of Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files from the Adobe website To improve the accessibility of our website, Lee County Government reviews the site's accessibility with outside web tools and periodically will ask users with disabilities to review the site. Adjustments are then made as necessary. If you have a disability and the format of any material on our website interferes with your ability to access some information contained on our site, please Website Content Coordinator Denise Scott at dscott@leegov.com She will refer your request to the appropriate Department to provide you with an alternate form of the requested material, as available. Please indicate the nature of the accessibility problem, your preferred format, the web address of the requested material and your full contact information so we can reach you if questions arise while fulfilling your request. January 24, 2017 Page 36

38 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan We welcome comments on how to improve the site's accessibility for users with disabilities. Contact Denise Scott by phone at or at Legal Notices Lee County provides this website as a public service. All Information submitted to Lee County via this site shall be deemed and remain the property of Lee County, except those submissions made under separate legal contract. Lee County shall be free to use, for any purpose, any ideas, concepts, or techniques contained in information provided to Lee County for and through this site. User access and use of this site constitutes acceptance of these terms and conditions. These terms and conditions may be updated periodically without notice to the user. Use of the Lee County logo is prohibited without official prior approval. Linking Linking to our website is permissible providing the link accurately describes the content of the linked page. Under no circumstances may you "frame" the website or any of its content. Each page within the website must be displayed in full, without any accompanying frame, design, branding, advertising or promotional materials. Any links from our site to external sites should not be considered an endorsement of that site. We are not responsible for the content of other websites. Security & Privacy Our website uses industry standard data encryption for credit card transactions. and information submitted in website forms is not secure and is subject to public records requests. Florida has a very broad public records law. Most of the written communications to or from County officials regarding County business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your communication may be subject to public disclosure. If you do not want your address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. s sent to staff will in no way be considered binding correspondence. For critical or legal correspondence, please contact staff via telephone or US Postal Service. Disclaimer You should not assume this website is error free. Although we will make every effort to include current and accurate information on our website, the potential exists that an error may occur. January 24, 2017 Page 37

39 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Therefore, the county nor any agency, officer or employee of the County warrants the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information at this website. Lee County government is not responsible for the results of any defects or misinformation that may be found to exist in this site, or any lost profits or any other consequential damages that may result from such defects or misinformation. Thank you for your understanding. January 24, 2017 Page 38

40 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan D. Public Access Computers Windows 7 Accessibility Accessibility in Windows 7 January 24, 2017 Page 39

41 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Use Accessibility Tools Windows 7 introduces significant improvements to the Microsoft accessibility tools Magnifier, On- Screen Keyboard, and Narrator. View Online Video Demos In this section learn how to: Magnifier On-Screen Keyboard Make items on the screen appear bigger (Magnifier) Type without using a keyboard (On-Screen Keyboard) Hear text read aloud with Narrator Use Speech Recognition Make items on the screen appear bigger (Magnifier) Magnifier enlarges different parts of the screen. This is especially useful for viewing objects that are difficult to see, but also for seeing the whole screen more easily. There are three modes: Full-screen mode. In full-screen mode, your entire screen is magnified. You can then have Magnifier follow the mouse pointer. Lens mode. In lens mode, the area around the mouse pointer is magnified. When you move the mouse pointer, the area of the screen that's magnified moves along with it. Docked mode. In docked mode, only a portion of the screen is magnified, leaving the rest of your desktop in a normal state. You can then control which area of the screen is magnified. January 24, 2017 Page 40

42 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Note Figure 1: Image of Magnifier magnifying a portion of the screen Full-screen mode and lens mode are only available as part of the Aero experience. If your computer doesn't support Aero, or if you're using a theme other than an Aero theme, Magnifier will only work in docked mode. Notes 1. Open Magnifier by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Magnifier. 2. On the Views menu, click the mode that you want to use. 3. Move the pointer to the part of the screen that you want to magnify. To exit Magnifier, press the Windows logo key +Esc. When you're using full-screen mode, you can quickly preview your entire desktop by clicking the Views menu, and then clicking Preview full screen. For a list of keyboard shortcuts that you can use with Magnifier, see Keyboard shortcuts. Magnifier topics in this section: To choose where Magnifier focuses To change the zoom level To set the zoom increment January 24, 2017 Page 41

43 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan To set the lens size To turn on color inversion To display the Magnifier toolbar To choose where Magnifier focuses 1. Open Magnifier by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Magnifier. 2. Click the Options button, and then select the option that you want: Option Follow the mouse pointer Follow the keyboard focus Have Magnifier follow the text insertion point Description Displays the area around the mouse pointer in the Magnifier window. When you select this option, you can choose to have the Magnifier window move when the mouse pointer approaches or when the mouse pointer hits the edge of the Magnifier window. Displays the area around the pointer when you press the Tab or arrow keys. Displays the area around the text that you're typing. To change the zoom level To 1. Open Magnifier by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Magnifier. 2. Do one of the following: Do this Zoom in Click Zoom in or press the Windows logo key +Plus sign Zoom out Click Zoom out or press the Windows logo key +Minus sign To set the zoom increment The zoom increment determines how quickly Magnifier zooms in and out. 1. Open Magnifier by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Magnifier. 2. Click the Options button, and then move the slider to adjust the zoom increment. Moving the slider to the left causes Magnifier to zoom slower, with smaller changes between zoom levels. Moving the slider to the right causes Magnifier to zoom faster, with larger changes between zoom levels. To set the lens size When you're using lens mode, you can adjust the size of the Magnifier lens. January 24, 2017 Page 42

44 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Notes 1. Open Magnifier by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Magnifier. 2. Click the Options button, and then, under Magnifier Lens Size, move the sliders to adjust the size of the Magnifier lens. The lens size changes right away. Adjust the level until it's right for you. You must be using lens mode for the lens size options to appear. You can quickly change the lens size by pressing Ctrl+Alt+R, and then moving the pointer up and down to change the height, and left and right to change the width. To turn on color inversion Turning on color inversion increases the contrast between items on your screen, which can help make your screen easier to see. 1. Open Magnifier by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Magnifier. 2. Click the Options button, and then select the Turn on color inversion check box. To display the Magnifier toolbar 1. Open Magnifier by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Magnifier. 2. Click the magnifying glass icon or click Magnifier on the taskbar. January 24, 2017 Page 43

45 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Type without using the keyboard (On-Screen Keyboard) Instead of relying on the physical keyboard to type and enter data, you can use On-Screen Keyboard. On-Screen Keyboard displays a visual keyboard with all the standard keys. You can select keys using the mouse or another pointing device, or you can use a single key or group of keys to cycle through the keys on the screen. Figure 2: Image of On-Screen Keyboard on computer screen On-Screen Topics in this section: To change how information is entered into On-Screen Keyboard To set On-Screen Keyboard to use audible clicks To use a numeric key pad in On-Screen Keyboard To enable text prediction in On-Screen Keyboard January 24, 2017 Page 44

46 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan To change how information is entered into On-Screen Keyboard In On-Screen Keyboard: 1. Open On-Screen Keyboard by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking On-Screen Keyboard. 2. Click Options, and then, under To use the On-Screen Keyboard, select the mode you want: Typing mode Click on keys Hover over keys Scan through keys Description In clicking mode, you click the on-screen keys to type text. In hovering mode, you use a mouse or joystick to point to a key for a predefined period of time, and the selected character is typed automatically. In scanning mode, On-Screen Keyboard continually scans the keyboard and highlights areas where you can type keyboard characters by pressing a keyboard shortcut, using a switch input device, or using a device that simulates a mouse click. Notes If you're using either hovering mode or scanning mode and accidently minimize On- Screen Keyboard, you can restore it by pointing to it in the taskbar (for hovering mode) or by pressing the scan key (for scanning mode). If you're using a mouse click to select a key in the Scan through keys mode, the mouse pointer must be located over On-Screen Keyboard. The keyboard layout changes in On-Screen Keyboard depending on the language displayed in the active program. To set On-Screen Keyboard to use audible clicks You can have On-Screen Keyboard make an audible click when a key is pressed. Open On-Screen Keyboard: 1. Open On-Screen Keyboard by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking On-Screen Keyboard. 2. Click Options, select the Use click sound check box, and then click OK. January 24, 2017 Page 45

47 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan To use a numeric key pad in On-Screen Keyboard You can use a numeric key pad to enter numbers with On-Screen Keyboard. 1. Open On-Screen Keyboard by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking On-Screen Keyboard. 2. Click Options, select the Turn on numeric key pad check box, and then click OK. To enable text prediction in On-Screen Keyboard When text prediction is enabled, as you type, On-Screen Keyboard displays a list of words that you might be typing. 1. Open On-Screen Keyboard by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking On-Screen Keyboard. 2. Click Options, select the Use Text Prediction check box, and then click OK. If you don't want to automatically add a space after you insert a word using text prediction, clear the Insert space after predicted words check box, and then click OK. Notes Text prediction is only available in English, French, Italian, German, and Spanish. To enable text prediction in a specific language, you must first install additional language files for that language. For more information, see Install or change a display language in Help. Text prediction isn't included in Windows 7 Home Basic. Hear text read aloud with Narrator Windows comes with a basic screen reader called Narrator, which reads text on the screen aloud and describes some events (such as an error message appearing) that happen while you're using the computer. Narrator topics in this section: Narrator Keyboard Shortcuts Choose which text Narrator reads aloud Change the Narrator voice Start Narrator minimized Narrator doesn t read what I expect it to I can t hear any text read aloud by Narrator o To check for a sound card o To determine if the sound card is working o Text to speech frequently asked questions Narrator is not available in all languages, so if the steps below don t work, Narrator is not available for your language. 1. Open Narrator by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Narrator. January 24, 2017 Page 46

48 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Narrator Keyboard Shortcuts Use the keyboard shortcuts in the following table to specify which text you want Narrator to read: Use this keyboard shortcut Ctrl+Shift+Enter Ctrl+Shift+Spacebar Ctrl+Alt+Spacebar Insert+Ctrl+G Ctrl Insert+Q Insert+W Insert+E Insert+R Insert+F2 Insert+F3 Insert+F4 Insert+F5 Insert+F6 Insert+F7 Insert+F8 To do this Get information about the current item Read the entire selected window Read the items that are selected in the current window Read a description of the items that appear next to the currently selected element Stop Narrator from reading text Move the cursor backward to the beginning of any preceding text that has different formatting. For example, the cursor moves from a bold word to the beginning of a non-bold word that precedes it. Move the cursor to the beginning of any text that follows it that has different formatting. For example, the cursor moves from a bold word to the beginning of a non-bold word that follows it. Move the cursor back to the beginning of any text that has the same formatting. For example, the cursor moves from the middle of a bold word to the beginning of that word. Move the cursor to the end of any text that has the same formatting. For example, the cursor moves from the middle of a bold word to the end of that word. Select all of the text that has the same formatting as the character at the cursor Read the current character Read the current word Read the current line Read the current paragraph Read the current page Read the current document Note The Insert key is used for Narrator commands, so when you press Insert while Narrator is running, you won't be able to insert characters. To use the Insert key to insert characters while Narrator is running, press Insert+I and then the characters you want to add. Choose which text Narrator reads aloud 1. Open Narrator by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Narrator. 2. Under Main Narrator Settings, do one or more of the following: January 24, 2017 Page 47

49 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan To hear what you type, select the Echo User's Keystrokes check box. To hear background events, such as notifications, select the Announce System Messages check box. To hear an announcement when the screen scrolls, select the Announce Scroll Notifications check box. Change the Narrator voice 1. Open Narrator by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Narrator. 2. Click Voice Settings, and then make any of the following adjustments: To select a different voice, click the voice you want to use in the Select Voice box. For a faster voice, select a number in the Set Speed list. The higher the number, the faster the voice. For a louder voice, select a number in the Set Volume list. The higher the number, the louder the voice. For a higher-pitched voice, select a number in the Set Pitch list. The higher the number, the higher the pitch. A higher-pitched voice can be easier for some people to hear. Start Narrator minimized 1. Open Narrator by clicking the Start button, clicking All Programs, clicking Accessories, clicking Ease of Access, and then clicking Narrator. 2. Select the Start Narrator Minimized check box. The next time you start Narrator, it will appear as an icon on the taskbar instead of being open on your screen. To restore the Narrator dialog box to its full size, click Narrator in the taskbar. Note Narrator doesn't read what I expect it to This topic provides information about problems you might run into when using Narrator. Narrator doesn't read what I expect it to read. Narrator provides basic screenreading capabilities that allow you to use Windows when you don't have a more fullfeatured screen reader. Narrator is not designed to read content in all programs. For more information about screen readers and other assistive technologies, go to the Microsoft Accessibility website Narrator doesn't read notifications or the contents of some folders. Narrator can't read notifications because notifications can't be selected. For the same reason, it can't read the contents of some folders. Narrator doesn't read some Help topics. Narrator can't read the text that appears below collapsed headings in Help topics. To read the text of Help topics with collapsed headings, tab to the Show all link at the top of the topic and press Enter to expand all the topics. Then press Ctrl+Shift+Spacebar to have Narrator read the window again. Narrator is not available in all languages. January 24, 2017 Page 48

50 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan I can't hear any text read aloud with Narrator Here are some things to try if you're having trouble hearing text read aloud by Narrator: Make sure that your speakers are connected properly. If you're not sure how to do this, check the information that came with your speakers. Make sure that the speaker volume is turned up sufficiently and your speakers aren't muted. Make sure that your sound card is properly installed and the drivers are updated. To check for a sound card 1. Open Audio Devices and Sound Themes by clicking the Start button, clicking Control Panel, clicking Hardware and Sound, and then clicking Sound. 2. Your sound card is listed on the Playback tab. If you don't have a sound card installed, you'll have to get one for Narrator to work. To determine if the sound card is working 1. Open Device Manager by clicking the Start button, clicking Control Panel, clicking Systems and Maintenance, and then clicking Device Manager. If you are prompted for an administrator password or confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation. 2. If the sound card has a yellow question mark next to it, the sound card might not be working. Try reinstalling the sound card driver. For more information, see Update a driver for hardware that isn't working properly, in Help. 3. If the sound card appears twice in the list, you might have a ghost device. If so, delete the entry with the question mark. Narrator does not read some Help topics Narrator cannot read the text that appears below collapsed headings in Help topics. To read the text of Help topics with collapsed headings, tab to the Show all link at the top of the topic and press ENTER to expand all the topics. Then press CTRL+SHIFT+SPACEBAR to have Narrator read the window again. The INSERT key doesn t work as expected when Narrator is running The INSERT key is used for Narrator commands, so when you press INSERT while Narrator is running, you won t be able to insert characters. To use the INSERT key to insert characters while Narrator is running, press INSERT+I and then the characters you want to add. Text to speech: frequently asked questions Here are some answers to common questions about text-to-speech programs. Note that Narrator is not available in all languages. Can on-screen text be read aloud to me? Yes, Narrator and other programs read aloud text, buttons, menus, file names, and other items on the screen even keystrokes. This can be helpful for people who don't see the screen or have difficulty seeing the screen. Does Windows include a text-to-speech program? January 24, 2017 Page 49

51 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan Yes. It's called Narrator. It's adjustable in many ways and can make the computer easier to use. For more information, see Hear text read aloud with Narrator in Windows Help. Can any computer read text aloud? Nearly any computer can be set up to read text aloud. Make sure your computer has a functioning sound card, and that you meet the basic requirements. For more information, see Troubleshoot Narrator problems in Help. Are there other text-to-speech programs? Yes, there are several. For a list of text-to-speech programs, go to the Microsoft Accessibility website Use Speech Recognition You can use your voice to control your computer. You can say commands that the computer will respond to, and you can dictate text to the computer. Before you get started using Windows Speech Recognition, you'll need to connect a microphone to your computer. Figure 3: Image of Set up Speech Recognition dialog box Once you've got the microphone set up, you can train your computer to better understand you by creating a voice profile that your computer uses to recognize your voice and spoken commands. For information about setting up your microphone, see Set up your microphone for Speech Recognition in Windows Help. After you've got your microphone and voice profile set up, you can use Speech Recognition to do the following: Control your computer. Speech Recognition listens and responds to your spoken commands. You can use Speech Recognition to run programs and interact with Windows. January 24, 2017 Page 50

52 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan For more information about the commands you can use with Speech Recognition, see Common commands in Speech Recognition in Windows Help. Dictate and edit text. You can use Speech Recognition to dictate words into wordprocessing programs or to fill out online forms in a web browser. You can also use Speech Recognition to edit text on your computer. For more information about dictating text, see Dictate text using Speech Recognition in Windows Help. Note Speech Recognition is available only in English, French, Spanish, German, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, and Traditional Chinese. Published by Microsoft Corporation Trustworthy Computing, Accessibility Group One Microsoft Way Redmond, Washington Copyright 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. For permissions, visit Microsoft and Windows are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Find further information on Microsoft Trademarks ( January 24, 2017 Page 51

53 Lee County ADA Title II Compliance -- Self-Evaluation Report and Transition Plan E. Department of Transportation Atkins Report January 24, 2017 Page 52

54 ADA Transition Plan February, 2015 CN Lee County Department of Transportation ADA Transition Plan Lee County, FL

55 Table of contents Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 3 2. Project Area Development 5 3. Final Project Area 8 4. Evaluation Criteria Data Collection GIS Database Analysis of Data The Next Steps 25 Appendix A. Project Area Development 27 A.1. Map 1: Lee County DOT Map of Functional Classification 28 A.2. Map 2: Lee County DOT Map of Major County and State Roadways 30 A.3. Map 3: Lee County DOT Crash Reports, dated A.4. Figure 1: Capital Improvement Projects in Construction 34 A.5. Table 1: Excluded Intersections 36 A.6. Map 4: Draft Land Use Map 38 A.7. Figure 2: Intersection Survey Priority Map 40 Appendix B. Evaluation Criteria 42 B.1. Figure 1: ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process 43 B.2. Figure 2: ADA Template for Sketches 53 B.3. Figure 3: Inspection Data Template 55 Appendix C. Analysis of Data 67 C.1. Table 1: Prioritization of Types of ADA Deficiencies 68 C.2. Table 2: Prioritization Scenarios with Queries by Issue 70 C.3. Figure 1: How to Use the Index 72 C.4. Table 3: Priority 1-5 Intersections Index 78 C.5. Table 4: Priority 6-10 Intersections Index 88 C.6. Table 5: Priority Intersections Index 98 C.7. Table 6: Priority Intersections Index 105 Tables & Figures Table 2-1 Reference Documents... 6 Table 3-1 Project Area... 9 Figure 6-1 Example of Photo Layer Table 7-1 Prioritization of Types of Deficiencies Table 8-1 Intersections Removed from Project Area Post Development... 26

56 1. Introduction 3

57 Introduction The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) is a civil rights statute that prohibits discrimination against people who have disabilities. Title II of the Act specifically addresses the subject of making public services and public transportation accessible to those with disabilities. Agencies are required to develop a Transition Plan to address any ADA deficiencies. This document will become an Appendix to the Lee County ADA Transition Plan, which is currently being developed. This document serves as a summary report for the deficiencies which have been identified at Lee County Department of Transportation maintained intersections. All assumptions are listed in this report and have been developed through coordination between Atkins and Lee County Department of Transportation. The following report is structured as follows: Project Area Development This section reviews the development of the project area for the LCDOT ADA Transition Plan. It also discloses how the project area was prioritized for the order of inspections. Final Project Area This section presents the list of the final project area that was identified. Evaluation Criteria This section documents the criterion that was identified in order to assess compliance of the project area with ADA accessibility. Data Collection This section reviews the processes that were taken during field inspections as well as the quality control. GIS Database This section summarizes the development of the geographic information system (GIS) database which is submitted electronically in conjunction with this report. Analysis of Data This section presents the process which was taken in order to prioritize the types of ADA deficiencies, rank the intersections by their degree of non-ada compliance, and generate the final recommendation reports which summarize the improvements needed at each intersection within the project area. The Next Steps This final section suggests subsequent tasks which should be considered during the ongoing development of the Lee County ADA Transition Plan. 4

58 2. Project Area Development 5

59 Project Area Development Development of Project Area Atkins developed a project area for the ADA Transition Plan for the Lee County Department of Transportation (LCDOT). This section outlines the methodology taken in developing the inspection locations. The project area is comprised of existing signalized intersections owned or maintained by Lee County. Additional un-signalized intersections were also included as documented below. Atkins utilized the following reference documents in determining the project area: Table 2-1 Reference Documents Location Description Appendix A Map 1 Lee County DOT Map of Functional Classification Appendix A Map 2 Lee County DOT Map of Major County and State Roadways Appendix A Map 3 Lee County DOT Crash Reports, dated 2009 Utilizing the Lee County Traffic Signal ArcGIS shape file, a list of all County owned signalized intersections of arterial roadways with arterial or major collector roadways was compiled. Next, a list of all County maintained un-signalized intersections of arterial or major collector roadways with arterial or major collector roadways within Lee County was compiled. The owners of each of these intersections were determined by using Map 2 in conjunction with Map 3. Additional criterion was utilized to determine whether the aforementioned locations should be excluded from proceeding to the data collection phase. Such criteria included: Intersections within Capital Improvement Project limits that are currently in construction (See Appendix A - Figure I) Intersection located within limited access R/W (I-75 ramps) No sidewalk connectivity on any legs of intersections within 500 The intersections that have been excluded due to these criteria are tabulated in Appendix A Table 1 along with the description of why they have been excluded. Prioritization of Project Area In order to prioritize both the order of inspections as well as the implementation of improvements, the project area was then divided into a hierarchy of groups. This process began by categorizing each intersection within the project area as urban, suburban, or rural based off of the existing Lee County Draft Future Land Use map (Appendix A Map 4). Atkins assumed all county maintained intersections identified in the project area that fall within incorporated cities as urban classification, since these areas are not identified on the Lee County Future Land Use map. Next, these intersections were ranked by their proximity to the following: 1. Within 2 miles of an urban elementary school 2. Within ½ mile of an urban middle school 3. Within 2 miles of a suburban elementary school 6

60 4. Within ½ mile of an urban high school 5. Within ½ mile of a suburban middle school 6. Within ½ mile of a suburban high school 7. Within ½ mile of a rural school 8. None of the above Lastly, these intersections were grouped by proximity to one another. These assigned groups and Priority Rankings are shown on Appendix A - Figure 2 Intersection Survey Priority Map. A list of intersections that encompass the final project area are shown in Table 3-1: Project Area. Each signalized intersection is identified by the respective Lee County signal ID number and each un-signalized intersection has been assigned a unique number. 4. Project Area 7

61 3. Final Project Area 8

62 Final Project Area Table 3-1: Project Area ID Roadway Intersecting Roadway Priority Ranking 3907 Daniels Parkway Gateway Boulevard Lee Boulevard Sunshine Boulevard Gunnery Road N 12 St W Gunnery Road Lee Boulevard Gunnery Road S 23rd Street SW th Street W Sunniland Boulevard th Street W Sunshine Boulevard Corkscrew Road Three Oaks Parkway Corkscrew Road River Ranch Road Corkscrew Road Via Coconut Point Ben Hill Griffin Parkway Estero Parkway Three Oaks Parkway Estero Parkway Three Oaks Parkway San Carlos Boulevard Ben Hill Griffin Parkway FGCU Ben Hill Griffin Parkway College Club Drive Ben Hill Griffin Parkway Gulf Coast Drive/Main Entrance Ben Hill Griffin Parkway Miromar Lakes Ben Hill Griffin Parkway FGCU Lakes Parkway Alico Road Quaker Road San Carlos Boulevard Oriole Road Sanibel Boulevard Lee Road Leeland Heights Boulevard Richmond Ave N Leeland Heights Boulevard Lee Boulevard Homestead Road Alabama Road Beth Stacy Boulevard Homestead Road Homestead Road Plaza Drive Homestead Road Taylor Lane Joel Boulevard Bell Boulevard S Lee Boulevard Williams Ave Lee Boulevard Homestead Road Lee Boulevard Hazelwood Ave Lee Boulevard Bella North River Road Broadway Bell Boulevard South Milwaukee Boulevard Homestead Road Milwaukee Boulevard Milwaukee Boulevard Alabama Road Williams Avenue W 6th Street Richmond Ave 6th Street College Parkway New Brittany College Parkway Summerlin Road College Parkway Whiskey Creek Drive College Parkway Winkler Road College Parkway South Pointe Boulevard College Parkway Riverwalk Park Boulevard Summerlin Road Park Meadow Drive 4 9

63 3212 Summerlin Road Maple Cypress Lake Drive Summerlin Road Cypress Lake Drive Edison Lane Cypress Lake Drive Winkler Road Cypress Lake Drive Panther Lane Cypress Lake Drive South Pointe Boulevard Cypress Lake Drive Overlook Drive Summerlin Road Edison Lane College Parkway Caloosa Yacht and Racquet Cape Coral Bridge Road Magnolia Point Summerlin Road Brantley Road Three Oaks Parkway Coconut Road Coconut Road Via Coconut Point Bonita Beach Road Imperial Shores Bonita Beach Road Vanderbilt Bonita Beach Road Mango Fire Station Bonita Beach Road Center of Bonita Plaza Bonita Beach Road Arroyal Road Bonita Beach Road Spanish Wells Bonita Beach Road Old 41 Road Bonita Beach Road Imperial Parkway Bonita Beach Road Downs Drive Bonita Beach Road Oakland Drive Crystal Drive Beacon Street Cypress Lake Drive Reflections Lake Parkway Daniels Parkway Plantation Road Daniels Parkway Brookshire Lake Boulevard Daniels Parkway Six Mile Cypress Daniels Parkway Bell Tower Road Cypress Lake Drive Cypress Trace Daniels Parkway Big Pine Way Gladiolus Drive Lakes Park Summerlin Road Lakewood Boulevard Six Mile Cypress Penzance Crystal Drive Plantation Road Six Mile Cypress Plantation Road Pine Ridge Road Fire Station Gladiolus Drive Maida Summerlin Road Gladiolus Drive Gladiolus Drive Winkler Road Gladiolus Drive Parker Lakes Gladiolus Drive Pine Ridge Road Summerlin Road Winkler Road Gladiolus Drive A&W Bulb Road Summerlin Road Bass Road Gladiolus Drive Hagie Drive Gladiolus Drive Bass Road Summerlin Road Pine Ridge Road Fowler Street Carrell Road Carrell Road Broadway Hanson Street Broadway Fowler Street Winkler Ave Extension 8 10

64 1607 Fowler Street N Airport Road Fowler Street Page Field Commons Colonial Boulevard Deleon Street Colonial Boulevard Summerlin Road Plantation Road Idlewild Street Summerlin Road Horizons Summerlin Road Boy Scout Drive Summerlin Road Cedar Bend Boy Scout Drive Red Cedar Drive Summerlin Road Matthews Drive Boy Scout Drive Ramsey Summerlin Road Royal Palm Square Colonial Boulevard Treeline Ave Treeline Ave Pelican Reserve Fire Station Six Mile Cypress Dani Drive Six Mile Cypress Challenger Boulevard Six Mile Cypress Winkler Ave Palm Beach Boulevard New York Drive Veronica Shoemaker Boulevard Michigan Ave Ballard Road Marsh Avenue Tice Street Country Lakes Drive Luckett Road Country Lakes Dive Orange River Boulevard Orange River Boulevard Ortiz Ave. Ballard Road Ortiz Ave. Luckett Road Ortiz Ave. Tice Street Pondella Road Moody Road Pondella Road April Lane Pondella Road Orange Grove Boulevard Del Prado Boulevard Hancock Bridge Parkway Del Prado Boulevard Bolado Parkway Del Prado Boulevard SE 6th Street Del Prado Boulevard Viscaya Parkway Del Prado Boulevard SE 12th Terrace Del Prado Boulevard Coral Point Drive Del Prado Boulevard Coral Point Mall Del Prado Boulevard SE 20th Street Del Prado Boulevard SE 22nd Terrace Del Prado Boulevard NE 6th Street Diplomat Parkway Corbett Road Hart Road Laurel Drive Burnt Store Road Ceitus Parkway Veterans Parkway Skyline Boulevard Veterans Parkway Chiquita Boulevard Veterans Parkway Surfside Boulevard Veterans Parkway Santa Barbara Boulevard Veterans Parkway Country Club Boulevard Del Prado Boulevard Veterans Memorial Parkway Del Prado Boulevard SE 26th Street Del Prado Boulevard SE 27th Street Del Prado Boulevard SE 28th Terrace Del Prado Boulevard Cornwallis Parkway 11 11

65 6514 Del Prado Boulevard SE 32nd Terrace Del Prado Boulevard Palaco Grande Parkway Del Prado Boulevard SE 36th Terrace Del Prado Boulevard Savona Parkway Del Prado Boulevard SE 40th Terrace Del Prado Boulevard Beach Parkway Del Prado Boulevard Cape Coral Parkway Del Prado Boulevard SE 47th Terrace Del Prado Boulevard SE 46th Street Veterans Parkway SW 20th Avenue Pine Island Road Stringfellow Road Gasparilla Road Fifth Street Park Avenue 4th Street Park Avenue 3rd Street Gulf Boulevard 1st Street Hancock Bridge Parkway Moody Road Hancock Bridge Parkway Orange Grove Boulevard Hancock Bridge Parkway Hunter Boulevard Corkscrew Road Stoneybrook Golf Drive Corkscrew Road Miromar Outlet Drive Ben Hill Griffin Parkway Miromar Outlet Drive Three Oaks Parkway Williams Road Alico Road Lee Road Alico Road Ben Hill Griffin Parkway Alico Road Oriole Road Williams Road Via Coconut Point San Carlos Boulevard Lee Road Williams Road River Ranch Road Buckingham Road Orange River Boulevard Buckingham Road Riverdale HS Mellow Drive Slater Road Daniels Parkway American Colony Daniels Parkway Fiddlesticks Boulevard Daniels Parkway Danport Bouelevard Daniels Parkway Treeline Ave S Daniels Parkway Chamberlin Boulevard Treeline Ave S Intercom Drive Daniels Parkway Sophomore Lane Joel Boulevard 10th Joel Boulevard East 12th Street Joel Boulevard East 6th Street Lee Boulevard Alvin Ave Lee Boulevard Leonard Boulevard North Leonard Boulevard North Westgate Boulevard Bonita Beach Road Lely Bonita Beach Road Bonita Grande Drive McGregor Boulevard Kelly Road McGregor Boulevard Iona Fire Station McGregor Boulevard John Morris Road Summerlin Road John Morris Road Summerlin Road McGregor Boulevard McGregor Boulevard Shell Point Boulevard 20 12

66 5924 McGregor Boulevard Punta Rassa Road Iona Road John Morris Road McGregor Boulevard Davis Road Iona Road Davis Road Captiva Road Andy Rosse Lane Evaluation 13

67 4. Evaluation Criteria 14

68 Evaluation Criteria Criteria In-field inspections of the identified project area helped to identify all physical obstacles that limit the accessibility of facilities to individuals with disabilities. Evaluation criterion was developed to assess compliance of intersections with ADA accessibility. ADA deficiencies within the limits of the signalized intersection (and a buffer of 100 from the intersection along each leg) were developed from the following documents: 2010 Standards for Accessible Design, published by the Department of Justice ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG, 2004) Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines DOT s ADA Standards for Transportation Facilities (2006) o Section 400 (curb ramps) o Section 705 (detectable warnings) The following inspection criterion was approved by County staff for data collection: Sidewalks Width, continuous and unobstructed (48 minimum) Clear width to obstructions (36 minimum at pinch point) Cross slope (perpendicular to direction of travel, 2% maximum) Grade away from intersection (8.33% maximum) Landing present (dimensions 48 x 48 minimum) Material (concrete, asphalt, other) Condition (good, cracked, shattered) Change in level surface along sidewalk (1/4 maximum) Drop offs in front of or behind sidewalk (4 maximum) Missing sections or gaps along sidewalk (1/2 maximum) Gaps aligned parallel to direction of travel Overhead obstructions (84 minimum) Also documented were sites where there are no existing pedestrian pathways Curb Ramps Note some intersections within the project area did not utilize curb and gutter. In these instances, the landings at the flush transitions of the street crossings were analyzed. Detectable warnings o Present o Material (rubber, plastic, stamped, other) o Color (black yellow, red, other) Detectable warning surfaces shall contrast visually with adjacent walking surfaces either light-on-dark, or dark-on-light o Extend full width of ramp (exclusive of flared slopes) o Measure 24 minimum from back of curb Ramp cross slope (2% maximum) Ramp grade (maximum 8.33%, for curb ramps constructed after January 26, 1992) Ramp width (48 minimum) Ramp within marked cross walk Curb ramp flare slope (maximum 8.33%) 15

69 Poles/pull boxes located within ramp Gutter slopes less than 5% (If the counter slope of a curb ramp exceeds 5 percent, the rate of change of grade is likely to exceed 13 percent, depending upon the grade of the ramp) Driveways Number of driveways crossing sidewalk Cross slope crossing sidewalk (2% maximum) Condition (good, cracked, shattered) Material (concrete, asphalt, other) Crosswalks Width parallel to traffic (6 minimum) Cross slope parallel to traffic (2% maximum) Pavement marking type (standard, special emphasis, other) Pavement marking material (thermoplastic, paint, other) Pavement marking condition (good, poor, other) Clear space of 48 at bottom of diagonal curb ramps within crosswalk markings Medians Median width Whether a refuge is provided within the median Refuge width Refuge surface material (concrete, asphalt, sod, other) If detectable warnings are present within median Refuge Islands Lighting If detectable warnings are present within the refuge island Width of main crosswalk to refuge island Width of minor crosswalk to refuge island Pavement marking type of minor crosswalk (standard, special emphasis, other) Pavement marking condition of minor crosswalk (good, poor, other) Ramp slopes within island (maximum 8.33%) Ramp cross slopes within island (2% maximum) If intersection lighting is present Pedestrian Signals Pedestrian signal heads present Type of pedestrian signal head (countdown, standard, audible) Push buttons present o Within 120 of other pushbuttons o Within 60 of applicable crosswalk line o Within 30 to 120 from curb line o Sidewalk to push button distance (15 maximum reach) o Parallel to direction of crossing o Clear level space of 30 x 48 at button o Height from sidewalk to center of button

70 o o o o Operable buttons Accessible buttons Signs present Type (standard, tactile) Obstructions in sidewalks, crosswalks, or curb ramps Signs Mailboxes Fire hydrants Benches Telephone pedestals Traffic signal controller boxes Newspaper boxes Drainage structures Tree grates Pole mounted objects Standing water 17

71 5. Data Collection 18

72 Data Collection Inspections In order to ensure continuity amongst inspectors, an official ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process document was created and in-field training with inspectors held. This document can be found in Appendix B Figure 1. The primary equipment utilized by each inspector to conduct the inventory at each intersection included: ipad Camera with GPS capabilities Measuring tape Measuring wheel Smart level Safety Vest Template sketch (sketch of intersection geometry, found in Appendix B Figure 2) Hard copy of data template (in the event the ipad is out of service, found in Appendix B Figure 3) ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process instructions Inspections were conducted in order of Priority Ranking as described in Section 2 of this report. Field inspections took place from December 2013 January The data collected for each intersection underwent the following quality control (QC) process. Quality Control Process Quality control (QC) measures were continually implemented to ensure that data collected was accurately represented. The numbers.zip file of each intersection was opened within icloud in order to verify and/or update the information submitted by the inspectors. Photographs assisted in the review of accuracy of data input. The QC process also confirmed that the ESRI data was input correctly and the orientation of the photos had been corrected as dictated in the official ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process document. Once the files were verified and/or updated, they were input into the geodatabase by Johnson Engineering. 19

73 6. GIS Database 20

74 GIS Database Geodatabase Input The Lee County ADA Transition Plan utilized as ESRI geodatabase designed to house the data related to each inspected intersection. The database serves as an ongoing tool to be used by County staff to track and manage ADA intersection and sidewalk information on an ongoing basis. The various features that have been set up in the submitted database have the ability to hyperlink fields for associated documents from the County s server for use by Lee County staff. The photos taken during inspections were taken with cameras using GPS technology in order to accurately depict the location of photos on the layer. These photos are shown in the ESRI map at the correct location and orientation so that County staff can easily see the features identified in the intersection reports and recommendation reports. Such an example is shown below in Figure 6-1. Figure 6-1 Example of Photo Layer 21

75 7. Analysis of Data 22

76 Analysis of Data Generic Prioritization of Types of Deficiencies Of the information that was collected during field inspections, various scenarios of ADA deficiencies were identified. Working with LCDOT staff, these scenarios were identified and prioritized by their degree of severity as shown below in Table 7-1. Table 7-1 Prioritization of Types of Deficiencies 23

77 This document can also be found in Appendix C Table 1. These scenarios were utilized to design search queries within a Microsoft Access database, titled Tables Export.mdb which is submitted in conjunction with this report. The queries that were used to design this database are listed in the document Prioritization Scenarios with Queries by Issue located in Appendix C Table 2 and are also viewable within the Microsoft Access file. Each of these queries was assigned a value in Microsoft Access based on the one identified in Table 7-1. Deficiency Ratings Following the input of field data into the geodatabase, Johnson Engineering then supplied an export of the database. These database files were opened in Microsoft Access and analyzed using the Tables Export.mdb to run the aforementioned queries. The result of the compilation of all of the ADA deficiencies identified at each respective intersection is called the Deficiency Rating. This is a rating of non ADA compliance; the higher the Deficiency Rating, the higher the degree of need for improvements. Such tabulation of inventory data is intended to assist the County in prioritization of improvements. This final table is referred to as the Index and facilitated with compilation of the final recommendation reports. The final indexes can be found in Appendix C - Tables 3 through 6. Recommendation Reports The recommendation reports are a detailed explanation of the findings represented in the index. The recommendation reports have summarized the improvements needed and defined the design standards that should be used for the improvements. Submittals were phased based off of priority groupings (Priority 1-5, Priority 6-10, Priority 11-15, and Priority 16-20). Each submittal included: One hard copy compilation of the recommendation report, inspection table report, photos, and sketch for each intersection in order of the index deficiency ranking (high to low). CD containing: o PDFs of photos for each intersection o PDFs of reports (inspection tables) for each intersection o PDFs of recommendations for each intersection o Index applicable to grouping o Index Instructions (also found in Appendix C- Figure 1 of this document) 24

78 8. The Next Steps 25

79 The Next Steps The Next Steps The following items are subsequent tasks that should be considered while finalizing the County Wide ADA Transition Plan: Preparation of a plan schedule for implementing the improvements that have been recommended. Indentifying potential funding opportunities for implementing recommendations. Developing an information page for the County s website where the public can seek out information about the Plan. Developing a web based procedure for citizens to file comments and inquiries regarding County pedestrian facilities. Continued utilization of the submitted GIS Database and Microsoft Access Database to expand project area when/if needed by County staff Note - the following intersection locations in Table 8-1 were removed from the Project Area after it had been established due to lack of pedestrian facilities and/or lack of budget for additional field inspections. Table 8-1 Intersections Removed from Project Area Post Development ID Roadway Intersecting Roadway Priority Ranking 3115 Crystal Drive Beacon Street Crystal Drive Plantation Road Luckett Road Country Lakes Dive Del Prado Boulevard Hancock Bridge Parkway Del Prado Boulevard Viscaya Parkway Gasparilla Road Fifth Street Park Avenue 4th Street Park Avenue 3rd Street Gulf Boulevard 1st Street Hancock Bridge Parkway Moody Road Hancock Bridge Parkway Orange Grove Boulevard Hancock Bridge Parkway Hunter Boulevard Williams Road Via Coconut Point Williams Road River Ranch Road Buckingham Road Orange River Boulevard Mellow Drive Slater Road Joel Boulevard 10th Joel Boulevard East 12th Street Joel Boulevard East 6th Street Captiva Road Andy Rosse Lane 21 26

80 Appendix A. Project Area Development

81 A.1. Map 1: Lee County DOT Map of Functional Classification 28

82 BROADWAY ST RD E RICHMOND AVE N R D S M S CE AC S MOORE AVE SUNRISE BLVD BELL BLVD S MILWAUKEE BLVD COLUMBUS BLVD D COLUMBUS BLVD TE A JOEL BLVD WILLIAMS AVE ALABAMA RD S BETH STACEY BLVD S NIMITZ BLVD SR 8 2 RD ALICO RD CH AS E DR CORKSCREW RD I-75 THREE OAKS PKWY RIVER RANCH RD SANDY LN WILLIAMS RD VIA COCONU T POINT COCONUT RD E E 2ND ST SENTINELA BLVD GRANT BLVD TREELINE AVE 40TH ST SW M E 7TH ST E 6TH ST EISENHOWER BLVD SUNSHINE BLVD N STRATTON RD 23RD ST SW H O E 6TH ST ORIOLE RD MIAMI BLVD LEE RD 1ST ST W 8TH ST SW SUNSHINE BLVD S ALVIN AVE M BLVD FO RU PALOMINO LN FIDDLES TICK S BLVD EAGLE RIDGE DR PERSIMMON RIDGE RD SR 31 NEAL RD STALEY RD ORTIZ AVE RE S EC YP MIL BE N MICHAE L G RIPPE PKWY W 6TH ST E 9TH ST JAGUAR BLVD 0 LD W TE RRY 41 RD BONITA BEACH RD SW E TERRY ST E TERRY ST ST PENN SYLVA NIA AVE DEAN ST IMPERIAL PKWY S TAMIAMI TRL O BONITA BEACH RD SE I-75 Prepared by Lee GIS, October 31, 2012 S RANCHETTE RD CP RA TT PLANTATION RD METRO PKWY S IX SOLOMON BLVD WILLIAMS RD Functional Classification PI N BROADWAY W D NR LV D Town of Fort Myers Beach VD BL B RY KO HIC City of Sanibel S 12TH ST W Y LV D City of Fort Myers O RL E 7TH ST ESTERO PKWY AY EW IN KL Lee County DOT ABRAMS BLVD EVANS AVE BROADWAY CORTEZ BLVD CLEVELAND AVE ST CA R TE AL IN W PK B RO City of Cape Coral B AM CH L IN ER E ES T City of Bonita Springs OLD BAYSHORE RD NALLE RD HART RD IXORA DR PINEY RD BETMAR BLVD MOODY RD ORANGE GROVE BLVD S CLEVELAND AVE HAGIE DR PINE RIDGE RD BASS RD N SA Local City Limits BU CK ING HA M NE 24TH AVE DEL PRADO BLVD N ACADEMY BLVD A RL OS B LV D WINKLER RD WINGED FOOT DR PA R KR D E 10TH ST SUNSET RD LE BLVD PA RK DA BRIARCLIFF RD SA N C DAVIS RD BUNCHE BEACH RD JOHN MORRIS RD WA Y AU SE LC SA NIB E DIXIE BEACH BLVD ISLAND PARK RD NE 7TH PL ANDALUSIA BLVD SANTA BARBARA BLVD PALM TREE BLVD PELICAN BLVD CHIQUITA BLVD S SW 20TH AVE AGUALINDA BLVD SANTA BARBARA BLVD SURFSIDE BLVD NOTT RD VETERANS PWKY OASIS BLVD YO RK RD GLADIOLUS DR BL VD E 12TH ST W 12TH ST MCARTHUR BLVD VD BL ND E 14TH ST W 14TH ST E DANIELS PKWY LA E 21ST ST W 7TH ST W 17TH ST ND AV D IN WOODLAND BLVD 59TH ST W RICHMO AN ISL S LV D DR IW PE R MA IN WB UL F R BL VD R ES D TG D WINKLER AVE EXT NA RD COLONIAL BLVD BRANTLEY RD GREENBRIAR BLVD LEE BLVD N LE O LA K WE S TIV AR SUMMERLIN RD R O BL VD D Minor Collector L- C AP KELLY RD CG EG LE ON AR D COLONIAL BLVD DA NLE Y DR 67TH ST W E ER C VD BL Major Collector SA NIB E BLVD HANSON ST Y B LV E WA IN T Arterial COLLEGE PKWY SU NN I FIN PKW Y BEN HILL GRIF PO Interstate DG E LUCKETT RD LUCKETT RD TREELIN E AVE S L EL SH IVA DR OLEAN DER ST CA PT Functional Classification RI CYPRESS LAKE DR IONA RD OR MCGR EG TB CEMETERY RD M COM EL DORADO PKWY E M Road Network IN BLVD EDISON AVE CRYSTAL DR GE R D EL DORADO PKWY W Legend DP O HILL AVE TICE ST E 23RD ST RIVE R GAT L BR ID H BALLARD RD Y W C ORA AC BE MICHIGAN AVE ST ND CO SE DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD MI CA PE LM VD BL N RIVER RD TUCKAHOE RD S GUN NERY RD D PK CARIBBEAN BLVD F V IE WR CAPE CORAL PKWY W RO CO DO NA ST GOL LLO GLEASON PKWY VISCAYA PKWY AS PK WY E TRAFALGAR PKWY VETERANS PKWY SW 32ND ST SANDS BLVD NICHOL FIFT H RD N GUNNERY N ISLA SE 8TH ST PA EVANS AVE E INGF ST R PIN E NW D RD HANCOCK BRIDGE PKWY D DR AN SE 24TH AVE SW SKYLINE BLVD CEITUS PKWY SW PINE ISLAND RD L E IS P IN DEL PRADO BLVD S SW 4TH ST NE 6TH ST RD ORAN GE FOWLER ST ANDALUSIA BLVD EMBERS PKWY PINE ISLAND RD PONDELLA RD D AN COUNTRY CLUB BLVD BOKEELIA RD NELSON RD N GASPARILLA RD OLD BURNT STORE RD BURNT STORE RD EL DORADO BLVD N CHIQUITA BLVD N NE L E IS PI N BLVD DAVIS EMBERS PKWY W CEITUS PKWY DIPLOMAT PKWY E TROPICANA PKWY E PINELAND RD LAUREL DR BAYSHORE RD BAYSHORE RD OLD OLGA RD LITTLETON RD KISMET PKWY E RD ET T TROPICANA PKWY W JACARANDA PKWY E DEAL RD B COR YUCATAN PKWY D BLV EN RD DIPLOMAT PKWY W GA GULFSTREAM PKWY SLATER RD L TR KISMET PKWY W CIR WY PK BLV D RILL AV E KISMET PKWY W ON OR M WIL T I NG RICH RD MELLOW DR DE NAVARRA PKWY G AT JACARANDA PKWY W ST WE MAIN ST DURDEN PKWY PALM CREEK DR MI DURDEN PKWY NALLE GRADE RD 5 DURRANCE RD IA AM NT I Miles

83 A.2. Map 2: Lee County DOT Map of Major County and State Roadways 30

84 I IA M AM 41 NT SR TR I L 4 Miles DEL PRADO BLVD N MELLOW DR 867A 867A Y BA I TR IA M AM 3 9 NT 7 N CLEV ELAND AVE 41 E R O SH 78 R BAYSHORE RD 78 D PA LM L ORTIZ AVE 865 DEL PRADO BLVD S 867A TRE E LINE AV E 88 5 LEE BLVD 884 LEELAND HGTS BLVD E 884 S RD COLONIA L BLVD 884 GE PALM BEACH BLVD 80 RE YP SIX 86 5 MIL E C RA TT CP TREELINE AVE S 885 BE N PK SUMMERLIN RD 869 BEN HILL GRIFFIN PKWY 885 SA N C A RLO S B LV D 86 5 WY EST ERO PKW Y 865 Major County-State Roadways COUNTY ROAD NUMBER STATE ROAD NUMBER I S TAMIAMI TRL 41 City of Cape Coral LVD City of Bonita Springs City of Fort Myers BONITA BEACH RD SE 865 I LV D Prepared by Lee County GIS, February 20, 2013 B RY KO Town of Fort Myers Beach HIC City of Sanibel CORKSCREW RD 850 OB ER ES T 86 5 CITY LOCAL & COLLECTOR ROADS ALICO RD 840 IMPERIAL PKWY 881 GLADIOLUS DR 865 DANIELS PKWY 876 THREE OAKS PKWY 881 G CYPRESS LAKE DR 876 E IPP GR9 73 LV D C VD BL R O EG 7 R 86 PKWY E COLLEGE 867A EL HA M RB GO RE CG OR EG M RA 86 7 L B RID A G SR MIC M R CG VD BL EC O METRO PKWY 739 CAP S CLEVELAND AVE 41 SS IN T 88 BR 4 ID FOWLER ST 863 PO GUNNERY RD 876 ID HANSON ST 739 RD N M CLEVELA ND AVE 41 FOWLER ST 739 DR MLK JR BLVD 82 D H B LV GUNNERY 87 6 VETERA NS PWKY 884 E W LL O GF E 76 7 VETERANS PKWY 884 VETERANS PKWY 884 LUCKETT RD 810 G A SL EI 8 7 D ID BR N 9 O 73 W PIN PONDELLA RD 78A IS IN ST R DN ND R ISL A PINE 78 SW R ND RD ED NE D AN SL EI PIN 78 BEAC 80 JOEL BLVD BUCKINGHAM RD BURNT STORE RD N RIVER RD 78

85 A.3. Map 3: Lee County DOT Crash Reports, dated

86 SR 31 M RD SR 8 2 WILLIAMS RD COCONUT RD MOORE AVE JOEL BLVD SUNRISE BLVD COLUMBUS BLVD 23RD ST SW E 2ND ST BELL BLVD S 8TH ST SW RICHMOND AVE N SUNSHINE BLVD N N GH A NEAL RD BUCK I LEE BLVD ALABAMA RD S METRO PKWY D CORKSC REW RD ESTERO PKWY BROADWAY W IMPER I-75 WY IAL PK S TAMIAMI TRL OLD 41 RD BASS RD NALLE RD LEE RD D ET R W 7TH ST ALICO RD I Bicycle Crashes ORTIZ AVE HART RD FOWLER ST RE GO MC G WINKLER RD AY SE W AU LC IBE ST SA N DIXIE BEACH BLVD R S CLEVELAND AVE RB LV D VD S ADO BL DEL PR SKYLINE BLVD PELICAN BLVD CHIQUITA BLVD S SE 24TH AVE DEL PRADO BLVD N ANDALUSIA BLVD SANTA BARBARA BLVD NELSON RD N CHIQUITA BLVD N EL DORADO BLVD N SANDS BLVD RD YOR K RD TREELINE AVE S FD PARK R D 3 UL ALICO RD B LV 2 ST G TIV A D BRIARCLIFF R SUN S E 23RD ST E 21ST ST MEA D RO 1 AP DANIELS PKWY E EST COUNT WE L- C COLONIAL BLVD A Y B LV D D BICYCLE CRASH IBE MA IN BE VD BL H TICE ST AC ALVIN AVE WR COUNTY MAINTAINED SA N SUMMERLIN RD LM PA D GATEW LLO STATE MAINTAINED KELLY RD R R EVANS AVE GFE CITY/PRIVATE MAINTAINED VETERANS PKWY O E N RIVER RD OL D OL G A RD D BURNT STORE RD L TR OLD BURNT STORE RD MI IN STR R Major Roads PONDELLA RD IONA RD IVA D CAPT Legend Y BA E MARIANA AVE SH 5 DURRANC E R IA AM D SW PINE ISLAND RD SE 8TH ST SLATER RD NT GASPARILLA R PINELAND RD LITTLETON RD I-7 OW RD

87 A.4. Figure 1: Capital Improvement Projects in Construction 34

88 Appendix A : Figure 1 Lee County CIP Projects from as of April 30th, 2013 Proj. No. Projects Status Manager A&W Bulb Road Widening Construction underway. Rob Phelan Preliminary design underway. Construction in Alico Rd 4L - Ben Hill/Airport Rd 2015/16 funded. Sarah Clarke Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities Daniels Pike/Ped gap fill in design Mike Tisch Bonita Beach Road - Phase II Construction underway. Sarah Clarke Bonita Beach Road - Phase III Design complete, construction right of way not funded Sarah Clarke Briarcliff/Ripp Signalization Signal must meet warrants after Metro Extension is open Steve Jansen Burnt Store Road Four Laning-78 to Van Buren Burnt Store Road Four Laning-78 to Van Buren Sarah Clarke Cape/Midpoint Plaza Reconstruction Construction underway at Cape. Midpoint complete. John Solich Captiva Drive Shoulders Ongoing vegetation maintenance. Betsie Hiatt Corkscrew Road Curve Ongoing vegetation maintenance. Betsie Hiatt Del Prado Signals/Resurfacing Construction underway. Steve Jansen E-ARCS Upgrade for Leeway Completing customer web access. Rob Radford Estero Blvd Improvements Preliminary construction underway Rob Phelan Landscaping phase to begin 2/2012 then enter Estero Parkway Extension maintenance phase. Bob Debrock Homestead 4L / Sunrise-Alabama ROW acquisition underway. Construction in 2015/16 Sarah Clarke I-75 Complimentary ITS Development Luckett Road 4L / Ortiz to I-75 Fiber for Daniels in conjunction with widening underway. Finalizing ROW acquisition. Construction not funded in 5 Year CIP. Awaldo Gonzalez Rob Phelan Matlacha Pass Bridge Replacement Construction underway. Sarah Clarke Mitigation Bank Ongoing permit discussions with Army Corps. Betsie Hiatt North Airport Road Extension West Design underway by developer. Sarah Clarke Ortiz Avenue/SR 80 - Luckett Road Ortiz Four Laning - MLK to Luckett ROW acquisition underway. Construction not funded in 5 Year CIP. ROW acquisition underway. Construction not funded in 5 Year CIP. Rob Phelan Rob Phelan Plantation Ext., Idlewild to Colonial Landscaping phase, in maintenance phase. Bob Debrock Signal System ATMS Upgrades Fiber to ATMS on Daniels, Cypress Lake and Colonial. Awaldo Gonzalez Six Mile Cypress Pkwy 4 Laning Construction underway. Rob Phelan Summerlin Bike-Ped Accommodation Construction to begin Oct Sarah Clarke Design completed, partial ROW acquisition underway Three Oaks Pkwy Extension, North Construction not funded in 5 Year CIP. Sarah Clarke Three Oaks Pkwy Widening Landscaping phase, 15% complete. Sarah Clarke C-1 Lehigh Resurfacing 2012 Underway. Dirk Danley C-1 County Wide Local Rd. Resurfacing Notice to proceed June Dirk Danley Bike Path Resurfacing Notice to proceed June Dirk Danley

89 A.5. Table 1: Excluded Intersections 36

90 Appendix A: Table 1 Excluded Intersections Roadway Intersecting Roadway Owned By Comments Estero Bouelvard Donora Boulevard County Capital Improvement Project limits Estero Bouelvard San Carlos Boulevard County Capital Improvement Project limits Buckingham Road Alvin Ave County no sidewalk connections within 500' Buckingham Road Cemetery Road County no sidewalk connections within 500' Slater Road Rich Road County no sidewalk connections within 500' Nalle Grade Nalle Road County no sidewalk connections within 500' Sunshine Boulevard W 12th Street County no sidewalk connections within 500' Williams Avenue W 12th Street County no sidewalk connections within 500' Littleton Road Corbett Road County no sidewalk connections within 500' Buckingham Road Gunnery Road County not pedestrian intersection Veterans Parkway Academy Boulevard County no sidewalk connections within 500' Sunshine Boulevard 23rd Street SW County not pedestrian intersection Bonita Beach Road Racetrak Road County Capital Improvement Project limits Treeline Ave S Terminal Access Road County under construction

91 A.6. Map 4: Draft Land Use Map 38

92 I IAM AM NT L TR SR 31 NALLE GRADE RD PALM CREEK DR STALEY RD RD BU CK ING HA M SUNRISE BLVD PALOMINO LN TREELINE AVE JAGUAR BLVD FIDDLESTICKS BLVD SR 8 2 TREELINE AVE S R D NIMITZ BLVD IN RM TE A AL S ES CC RD ISLAND PARK RD ALICO RD WINGED FOOT DR RD CYPRESS DR N ORIOLE RD PAR K LEE RD WINKLER RD SU M M ER LI N Y W PK VD D BL LV EL S B B O NI RL MATANZAS RD SA CA N SA MAIN ST PI NE CH AS E DR CORKSCREW RD ESTERO PKWY ESTERO PKWY EXT BROADWAY E SANDY LN BROADWAY W THREE OAKS PKWY AY LE W INK RD INN ND A L IS WILLIAMS RD WILLIAMS RD VIA COCONUT POINT Rural Rural Community Preserves Coastal Rural I-75 COCONUT RD Outer Islands E EST B RO Open Lands LVD Density Reduction / Groundwater Resource S TAMIAMI TRL CONSERVATION LANDS CATEGORIES Conservation Lands - Upland Conservation Lands - Wetland OLD 41 RD DEAN ST IMPERIAL PKWY VANDERBILT DR DRAFT LAND USE MAP IA AVE PENNSYLVAN E TERRY ST Miles DR BONITA GRANDE Incorporated Areas BONITA BEACH RD SW ST I-75 D BLV RY KO HIC Public Facilities ARROYAL RD W TERRY BONITA GRANDE DR 0 COUNTY-WIDE CATEGORIES Place-Based Categories COLUMBU S BLVD GR AN T GRANT BLVD COLUMBU S BLVD S BL VD R D E 2ND ST SENTINELA BLVD PAR KDALE BLVD LIN ER B AM CH BRIARCLIFF RD RURAL CATEGORIES Wetlands MOORE AVE MCARTHUR AVE RICHMOND AVE N RICHMOND AVE DELAWARE RD ES TE A D MCARTHUR AVE WILLIAMS AVE 40TH ST SW BETH STACEY BLVD GOLFVIEW BLVD 23RD ST SW H O M BELL BLVD S M IL EC YPR ESS 8TH ST SW S IX PRA TT BEN C EAGLE RIDGE DR MICH AEL G RIPPE PKWY GLADIOLUS DR JOEL BLVD ABRAMS BLVD ALVIN AVE BL VD FO RU M ON PL AN TA TI PLANTATION RD METRO PKWY 7TH ST SW E 7TH ST E 6TH ST EISENHOWER BLVD SUNSHINE BLVD N ORTIZ AVE NEAL RD S RD BL VD SUNSHINE BLVD S COUNTRY LAKES DR MARSH AVE JACKSONVILLE ST VERONICA SHOEMAKER BLVD FORD ST WORK DR FOWLER ST EVANS AVE EVANS AVE CLEVELAN D AVE BROADWAY BEACON BLVD S CLEVELAND AVE SOU TH P OIN TE B LVD A & W BULB RD D LV B BASS RD HAGIE DR CONCOURSE DR PINE RIDGE RD BROADWAY ST DURRANCE RD IXORA DR CORTEZ BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD S SAN CARLOS BLVD JOHN MORRIS RD BUNCHE BEACH RD LE O NA RD DANIELS PKWY WA Y DAVIS RD 1ST ST W E 9TH ST E 6TH ST MILWAUKEE BLVD CYPRESS LAKE DR LC AU SE SA NIB E LEE BLVD R FIN D GRIF CAU SEW AY B LVD DIXIE BEACH BLVD DR RABBIT RD TG UL F IW PER OLD BAYSHORE RD NALLE RD HART RD MOODY RD ORANGE GROVE BLVD PINEY RD HIBISCUS DR BETMAR BLVD NE 24TH AVE DEL PRADO BLVD N ANDALUSIA BLVD ACADEMY BLVD COUNTRY CLUB BLVD COUNTRY CLUB BLVD PALM TREE BLVD SANTA BARBARA BLVD PELICAN BLVD SKYLINE BLVD AGUALINDA BLVD CHIQUITA BLVD S SW 20TH AVE SURFSIDE BLVD OASIS BLVD SANDS BLVD SE 24TH AVE NOTT RD VETERANS PWKY PALM AVE ANDALUSIA BLVD NE 7TH PL NELSON RD N CHIQUITA BLVD N EL DORADO BLVD N SANTA BARBARA BLVD BURNT STORE RD OLD BURNT STORE RD OLD BURNT STORE RD S OLEANDER ST YO RK RD WOODLAND BLVD W 6TH ST E 10TH ST D MCARTHUR BLV CRYSTAL DR E 7TH ST ALABAMA RD S PENZANCE BLVD BL VD 12TH ST W S GUNNERY RD Interchange WE S RD N GUNNERY RD Airport Lands University Community SOUTH RD MAPLE DR IDLEWILD ST E 12TH ST W 12TH ST SUNSET RD R ES D LAK RCE L-C AP TIV A COLONIAL BLVD LA ND ME COM SA NIB E SU NN I E 14TH ST W 14TH ST PKWY Industrial Research Development LUCKETT RD W 7TH ST W 17TH ST BEN HILL GRIFFIN Commercial Tradeport O EG R R DANLE Y DR E 21ST ST 59TH ST W WINKLER AVE EXT COLONIAL BLVD GREENBRIAR BLVD CEMETERY RD VD Y BL EWA GAT VD BL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CATEGORIES GO RE 67TH ST W TE BLVD WESTGA N T OIN Coastal Suburban CG M KELLY COVE DR LP EL SH DR Suburban 2 IVA CAPT Suburban 4 BR ID GE COLLEGE PKWY TUCKAHOE RD D LV B IONA RD VD BL KELLY RD BLVD DAVIS G C M Urban Core R D H BLV BEAC PALM ER BL VD D R A N O LE URBAN CATEGORIES Urban Neighborhood Y W PK BOKEELIA RD T ET CH Land Use Map Urban Places IT PR CA PE CO RA LB RID GE RD LUCERNE PKWY EL DORADO PKWY W SUBURBAN CATEGORIES IN T HANSON ST WINKLER AVE Y KW EL DORADO PKWY E Suburban 6 RD CAPE CORAL PKWY W HILL AVE MI DP O DR COUT BOY S P DO NA RO CO SLATER EDISON AVE WHISKEY CREEK DR MOHAWK PKWY EVANS AVE RD OW GLEASON PKWY MICHIGAN AVE T ST D YS BA ON C SE DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD VETERANS PKWY LUCKETT RD BALLARD RD GE ID BR NW ELL INGF STR DRAFT TICE ST NICHOLAS PKWY E TRAFALGAR PKWY BEACH PKWY W VISCAYA PKWY SE 9TH ST ORAN GE RIV ON Y KW SE 8TH ST CARIBBEAN BLVD ST FIFTH E 23RD ST IS ED SP LA HO NIC SW 4TH ST SW 32ND ST PONDELLA RD HANCOCK BRIDGE PKWY SW PINE ISLAND RD PINE INE E MARIANA AVE NE 6TH ST D DR AN ISL LAUREL DR PINE ISLAND RD HERRON RD EMBERS PKWY CEITUS PKWY D NW ND R ISLA AVE AN D EVEL N CL P NE CEITUS PKWY DIPLOMAT PKWY E TROPICANA PKWY E BAYSHORE RD N RIVER RD OLD OLGA RD BAYSHORE RD LITTLETON RD BARRETT RD TROPICANA PKWY W LITTLETON RD KISMET PKWY E D TR ET RB CO DIPLOMAT PKWY W EMBERS PKWY W VD BL KISMET PKWY W YUCATAN PKWY PINELAND RD EN RD GA GULFSTREAM PKWY VD L BL KISMET PKWY W RIL AVE KISMET PKWY W ING JACARANDA PKWY E DEAL RD MELLOW DR TUCKER LN CIR LM WI Y KW NP TO RICH RD DE NAVA RRA PKWY OR GAT JACARANDA PKWY W IR RC TO GA T WES MAIN ST H RT NO 5 PERSIMMON RIDGE RD I-7 DURDEN PKWY DURDEN PKWY PANGOLA DR A RD GASPARILL DRAFT LAND USE MAP BONITA BEACH RD SE DRAFT MAP GENERATED: 3/18/2013

93 A.7. Figure 2: Intersection Survey Priority Map 40

94

95 Appendix B. Evaluation Criteria 42

96 B.1. Figure 1: ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process 43

97 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process Photo Instructions: 1. Using a GPS camera, hit the button on the left side of the camera. Ensure that within GPS options that Record GPS data is turned ON. Before capturing any images, the below icon must be present on the screen for an accurate location. 2. Capture photographs of: Each curb ramp inspected from a view within the crosswalk/street. Any physical obstacles identified during inspection. Applicable ADA amenities at each location. At sites where there is no existing pedestrian pathway, document whether or not there is any obvious evidence of pedestrian use. 3. Refer to Deliverable to Johnson Engineering portion of this document for the procedure of uploading, renaming, and sending photographs. Numbers File Instructions: 1. Open the numbers application. Hold down the MASTER TEMPLATE spreadsheet with your finger until all of the graphics start to wiggle. Then hit the + button in the top left. This will create a copy of the master, MASTER TEMPLATE copy. 2. Hold your finger down on the text below the icon of the spreadsheet, and the Rename Spreadsheet dialog will appear. Rename the spreadsheet using the format Intersection ID 1

98 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process Roadway & Intersecting Roadway. You can reference either the ESRI map or the hard copy of the Intersections Progress by Priority. 3. Within applicable tabs/features there is a column Exists (T/F) that may be helpful to fill out prior to beginning inspections so that you can track whether the absence of data entry in a row is due to the absence of a feature or due to the fact that the segment has not been inspected yet. Please note that if a field is checked it means TRUE, and if left unchecked it means FALSE. 4. CURB RAMP TAB NOTES If one curb ramp services both sidewalk legs at the corner of an intersection, on the curb ramp tab you will still need to check exists for both legs and repeat the data as it applies to the same curb ramp for each leg. The only data that may be different in this scenario is the curb ramp flare as it applies to either side of the ramp. Failing to repeat the information on both applicable segments could potentially flag a segment of the intersection as deficient for lack of curb ramp when in reality it is not. 2

99 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process 5. DRIVEWAYS,CROSS TAB NOTES The segment ID applicable to the crosswalk should correspond with the leg of the closest corner (not necessarily the leg where sidewalk is identified) as depicted in the template sketch below. For example, if there is only sidewalk on leg SC1 and a curb ramp with a crosswalk crossing from C to B, then: SC1 sidewalk exists SC2 curb ramp exists SC2/SB2 crosswalk exists 6. SIDEWALK TAB NOTES If sidewalk exists at a corner but no curb ramps or connectivity (crosswalk) exists to service that corner, still inspect the sidewalks but leave the curb ramp and crosswalk tabs as false for exists. This will help in the future flag the corner as a deficiency for its lack of connectivity. 7. PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLANDS If a pedestrian refuge island exists, treat the intersection as if the island does not exist (IE if there is a pedestrian island within the crosswalk of SB2/SC2, still gather the information for the curb ramps and crosswalk on corner C for rows SC1 and SC2 where applicable). The information gathered specifict to the pedestrian refuge island, including the crosswalk as it enters and leaves the islands, will be recorded in the columns following Refuge Island Exists? 8. TRAFFIC OPS TAB NOTES Figure 4E 3 (below) shows typical areas for push button location. It can be used to help determine if a push button is located within 60 of a crosswalk line, of if a push button is within 30 to 120 from a curb line. 3

100 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process ArcGIS Online ESRI Instructions: 9. Open the ArcGIS ESRI icon on the ipad and click Maps in the top left corner. Sign in. 10. Select My Groups. 11. Select Atkins Lee Co ADA. 12. Select atkins_ada_editing. 4

101 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process 13. In ESRI application, select by tapping the red symbol at the intersection you are inspecting. 5

102 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process 14. In the top right of the dialog box, click the arrow. Select Edit. Enter name, date, and change Inspected to Yes. The red symbol should change to a green check. 15. One photo should be taken from the ipad from an angle that encompasses the intersection. This can be done while in the Edit box. Select Attachments while in the Attributes dialog box. 6

103 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process 16. Select Add, and Take photo or video. 17. The photo will appear at the bottom of the dialog box under Photo Link. 7

104 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process Deliverable to Johnson Engineering: 1. Prior to uploading inspection material, create a copy of the master folder at this location: Z:\Transportation\Lee County CN ADA Transition Plan\Inspections and rename it using the format Intersection ID Roadway & Intersecting Roadway. For example: 3505 McGregor Boulevard & Kelly Road. This folder will have three subfolders: 1. Photos 2. Report 3. Sketch 2. In addition to the photo uploaded via the ipad to represent the intersection, photos should be taken with the GIS camera and uploaded to the intersection specific folder on the server in the Photos subfolder. 1. Each photo should be renamed based off of the intersection ID, then segment ID of where the photo was taken, followed by the sequential number (based on how many photos were taken on that leg of the intersection). For example: 5919_SA _SA Use GeoSetter to adjust these photos to the correct location and orientation. 1. Download GeoSetter to your desktop from At the website, click on the Downloads tab and then click on geosetter_setup.exe. Run this file and save the program to your desktop. 2. Double click the GeoSetter icon on your desktop to open the program. At the top of the screen below the area titled Map change the map setting to Google Satellite Map. 8

105 Lee County ADA Transition Plan Inspection Process 3. On the top left where the folder symbol is path out to the folder where you have saved the photos for the given intersection. You should see thumbnails of the photos within the selected folder appear in the top left quadrant and a purple pin and arrow appear on the map. 4. Drag and drop the pin of the selected photo (a preview of selected photo will appear in the bottom left quadrant) to the correct location. When the Changed Position dialog box appears, select Move Image. 5. Next, drag the red dot at the end of the red line (within the large purple triangle) to the correct location to rotate the triangle. The purple triangle represents the vantage point of the photographer. The area shaded in purple represents the area seen in the photograph. 6. Once your photo is positioned correctly, go to the Images menu in the top left and scroll down and select Save Images. You should now see a new file within the folder where your photographs were saved with _original at the end of it. The _original files are the original photos from the camera. The.JPG files are the files that have the updated position embedded in their photos properties. 7. The updated photo should then be saved into a.zip folder to compress for ing, saved as ID Photos.zip. For example, 3505 Photos.zip. 4. Scan the sketch of the intersection that was done in the field and rename it Intersection ID Sketch and save it in the Sketch subfolder for the intersection. 5. On the ipad, go to the numbers app and to the main page where you can see all of the documents as thumbnails. Hit the box with the arrow up in it (top left corner of screen next to the + sign. Select Send a Copy, select the numbers file you would like to send. Select Mail and then choose Numbers when it asks you for the format. it to yourself and save it in the Report subfolder for the intersection. 9

106 B.2. Figure 2: ADA Template for Sketches 53

107

108 B.3. Figure 3: Inspection Data Template 55

109 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - CURB RAMPS Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west SEG_ID CR_DET_WARN_FUCR_DET_24in_DEEPCR_DET_WARN CR_DET_SURF CR_DET_MAT CR_DET_CLR CR_CRO_SLO_PERCR_RAMP_GR Segment ID SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 Curb Ramp Exists Detectable Warning extends full width of ramp? Detectable Warning at least 24 deep? Detectable warnings deficient? Detectable warning surface missing? True/False True/False True/False True/False True/False Detectable warning surface material? Rubber, plastic, stamped, other Detectable warning surface color? Black, yellow, red, other Ramp cross (max 2%) number Ramp grade (max 8.33%) number 1

110 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - CURB RAMPS Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west CR_RAMP_WIDCR_RAMP_CWK CR_ FLR_SLO CR_FLR_SLO_PERCR_OBS CR_GTR_SLP NOTES Ramp width (48 min) Ramp falls outside of marked cross walks? Curb ramp flare slopes present? Curb ramp flare slope? (max 8.33%) Poles or pullboxes located in ramps? Gutter slopes less than 5%? Notes number True/False True/False number True/False True/False text SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 2

111 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - DRIVEWAYS, CROSSWALKS, MEDIANS, LIGHTING Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west Segment ID Exists Driveway cross slope crossing sidewalk? (max 2%) Number of driveways crossing sidewalk Driveway condition? Driveway material Exists Crosswalk width, parallel to traffic? (min 6 ) Crosswalk slope, parallel to traffic? (max 2%) True/False number number Good, cracked, shattered Concrete, asphalt, other number number SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 3

112 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - DRIVEWAYS, CROSSWALKS, MEDIANS, LIGHTING Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west Pavement marking type? Pavement marking material? Pavement marking material condition? Exists Median width, feet (if present) Refuge provided? Refuge width, feet Refuge surface material? (std, special emphasis, other) (thermo, paint, other) (good, poor, other) True/False number True/False number (concrete, asphalt, sod, other) SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 4

113 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - DRIVEWAYS, CROSSWALKS, MEDIANS, LIGHTING Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west Refuge Island Exists Detectable warnings present within island Width of main crosswalk, feet Width of crosswalk from island to corner, feet Pavement marking type of minor crosswalk Pavement marking condition of minor crosswalk Ramp slopes within island 8.33% or less Ramp cross slopes within island 2% or less Pedestrian signal head present within refuge island instead of street corner Intersection lighting present? True/False True/False number number (std, special emphasis, other) (good, poor, other) True/False True/False True/False True/False SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 5

114 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - OBSTRUCTIONS (in / or above sidewalk, crosswalk, curb ramps, or pedestrian islands) Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west SEG_ID OB_SIGN OB_MBOX OB_FHYD OB_BENCH OB_TELE Segment ID Exists Signs Maliboxes Fire hydrants Benches Telephone pedestal True/False True/False True/False True/False True/False True/False SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 6

115 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - OBSTRUCTIONS (in / or above sidewalk, crosswalk, curb ramps, or pedestrian islands) OB_TRSC OB_NEWSBOB_DRSTR OB_TRGR OB_POLE OB_WTR NOTES Segment ID Traffic signal cabinet Newspaper boxes Pole Drainage structures Tree grates mounted objects Standing water Notes True/False True/False True/False True/False True/False True/False SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 7

116 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - SIDEWALKS Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west SEG_ID SW_WIDTH SW_CL_WID SW_CS SW_GR_AW_INTSW_LND SW_MAT Segment ID Exists Sidewalk Width in Inches? (48" Min) Sidewalk Clear Width to Obstruction is less than 36"? Sidewalk Cross Slope? (Max 2%) Sidewalk Grade Away from Intersection? (Max 8.33%) Sidewalk Landing Present >= 48 x 48 Sidewalk Material? True/False number True/False number number True/False Conc/Asph/Other SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 8

117 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - SIDEWALKS Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west SEG_ID SW_COND SW_SURF_CH SW_DROP SW_OH_OBS SW_MISS NOTES Segment ID Sidewalk Condition? Change in Level Surface Along Sidewalk GREATER THAN 1/4"? Drop-Offs In Front or Behind Sidewalk GREATER THAN 4"? Overhead Obstructions Along Sidewalk LESS THAN 84"? Missing Sections or Gaps Along Sidewalk GREATER THAN 1/2"? Notes Good / Cracked / Shattered True/False True/False True/False True/False text SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 9

118 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) 0 - north, 90 - east, west SEG_ID TO_SIG TO_SIG_TYPTO_BUTTON TO_BUTN_DIST TO_BUTN_CW_DISTTO_BUTN_CL_DIS TO_BUTN_DIST_FT TO_BUTN_PAR TO_BUTN_SPACE Segment ID Exists Ped signal heads present? Type of ped signal heads? Pedestrian push buttons present? Push button within 120 of other push buttons? Push button located within 60 of crosswalk line? Push button located 30 to 120 from curb line? Sidewalk to push button distance Push button is parallel to direction of crossing? Clear, level space of 30 x 48 at push button? SA1 True/False True/False countdown, std, audible, th True/False True/False True/False True/False Number in feet True/False True/False SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 10

119 Lee County Transportation - Intersection Inventory - TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Intersection ID County Road Intersecting Road Posted Speed(s) Survey Completed By: Date of Survey: County Road compass north (degrees) TO_BUTN_HT TO_BUTN_OTO_BUTN_ATO_BUTN_SN TO_BUTN_TYPE NOTES Segment ID Height from sidewalk to center of button is 42 to 48? Operable buttons? Accessible buttons? Pedestrian push button signs present? Type of push button Notes True/False True/False True/False True/False standard/tactile text SA1 SA2 SB1 SB2 SC1 SC2 SD1 SD2 11

120 Appendix C. Analysis of Data 67

121 C.1. Table 1: Prioritization of Types of ADA Deficiencies 68

122 Prioritization of Types of ADA Deficiencies Priority Ranking Type Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Value 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists but cross walk does not 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is missing 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% 3 1 Curb Ramp If sidewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't 3 1 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't 3 1 Mdi Median if median refuge exists it and no detectable dt tbl warnings exist it 3 1 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and detectable warnings do not exist 3 1 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and ramp slopes within island are not 8.33% or less 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and clear width to obstruction is <36" 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and sidewalk landing at top of ramp is not present 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and there is a change in level surface along sidewalk greater then 1/4" 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of side 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and there are overhead obstructions along sidewalk less then 84" 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" 3 1 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and distance from sidewalk to push button is not equal to or less then 10" 3 1 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and the push button is not operable 3 1 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and the push button is not accessible 3 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and doesn't extend full width 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" deep 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalks 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and the width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk 2 2 Driveways If driveway exists and cross slope of sidewalk crossing driveway is <2% 2 2 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and crosswalk width is less then 6' 2 2 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor 2 2 Median if median refuge exists and refuge width is <36" 2 2 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and pavement marking condition of minor crosswalk is poor 2 2 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and width of crosswalk from island to corner is <6' 2 2 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and ramp cross slopes in island are not 2% or less 2 2 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and width of sidewalk is <48" 2 2 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and cross slope is >2% 2 2 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and sidewalk condition is cracked or shattered 2 2 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and push buttons aren't within 60" of the applicable crosswalk line 2 2 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and push button is not located within range of 30" 120" from curb line 2 2 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and there is not a level space at the push button 2 2 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and there is no push button sign present 2 3 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is not contrasting 1 3 Curb Ramp If curb ramp flare slopes are present and curb ramp flare slopes are greater then 8.33% 1 3 Driveways If driveway exists and driveway condition is cracked or shattered 1 3 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and crosswalk cross slope is >2% 1 3 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and 48" extension in crosswalk for diagonal crossing does not exist 1 3 Sidewalk if no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use 1 3 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons 1 3 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing 1 3 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and the height from the sidewalk to the center of the push button is not within 42" 48" 1 Prioritization Scenarios.xlsx

123 C.2. Table 2: Prioritization Scenarios with Queries by Issue 70

124 Types of ADA Deficiencies Type Access Query Scenario 1 Column Heading in Numbers File Scenario 2 Column Heading in Numbers File Curb Ramp CR_Issue01 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) but cross walk does not CROSSWALK EXISTS (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue02 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and doesn't extend full width CR_DET_WARN (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue03 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and detectable warning surface is <24" deep CR_DET_24in_DEEP (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue04 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and detectable warning surface is missing CR_DET_SURF (TRUE/CHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue05 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and detectable warning surface is deficient CR_DET_WARN (TRUE/CHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue06 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and detectable warning surface is not contrasting if CR_DET_CLR (BLACK) and SW_MAT (ASHPHALT) or if discovered in QC Curb Ramp CR_Issue07 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% CR_CRO_SLO_PER (>2.0%) Curb Ramp CR_Issue08 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalks CR_RAMP_CWK (TRUE/CHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue09 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% CR_RAMP_GR (>8.33%) Curb Ramp CR_Issue10 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and ramp width is <48" CR_RAMP_WID (<48") Curb Ramp CR_Issue11 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and obstructions are located within the ramp CR_OBS (TRUE/CHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue12 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and gutter slopes are greater then 5% CR_GTR_SLP (FALSE/NOT CHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue13 If curb ramp flare slopes are present CR_ FLR_SLO (TRUE/CHECKED) and curb ramp flare slopes are greater then 8.33% CR_FLR_SLO_PER (>8.33%) Curb Ramp CR_Issue14 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and curb ramp doesn't CURB RAMP EXISTS (FALSE/CHECKED) Curb Ramp CR_Issue15 If curb ramp exists CURB RAMP EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk SW_WIDTH>CR_RAMP_WID Driveways DW_Issue01 If driveway exists DRIVEWAY EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and cross slope of sidewalk crossing driveway is <2% DW_CR_SLO_SW (>2%) Driveways DW_Issue02_Cracked DW_Issue02_Shattered If driveway exists DRIVEWAY EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and driveway condition is cracked or shattered DW_COND (CRACKED OR SHATTERED) Crosswalk CW_Issue01 if crosswalk exists CROSSWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and crosswalk width is less then 6' CW_WID_PAR (<6') Crosswalk CW_Issue02 if crosswalk exists CROSSWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and crosswalk cross slope is >2% CW_SLO_PAR (>2%) Crosswalk CW_Issue03 if crosswalk exists CROSSWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and pavement marking condition is poor CW_MK_MAT_COND (POOR) Crosswalk CW_Issue05 if crosswalk exists CROSSWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and curb ramp doesn't CURB RAMP EXISTS (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Median MD_Issue01 if median refuge exists MEDIAN REFUGE EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and refuge width is <36" MD_REF_WID (<36") Refuge Island RI_Issue01 If refuge island exists REFUGE ISLAND EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and detectable warnings do not exist RI_DET_SURF (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Refuge Island RI_Issue02 If refuge island exists REFUGE ISLAND EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and pavement marking condition of minor crosswalk is poor RI_MK_MAT_COND (POOR) Refuge Island RI_Issue03 If refuge island exists REFUGE ISLAND EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and width of crosswalk from island to corner is <6' RI_CW_WID_ISL_COR (<6') Refuge Island RI_Issue04 If refuge island exists REFUGE ISLAND EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and ramp slopes within island are not 8.33% or less RI_SLO_ISL_833 (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Refuge Island RI_Issue05 If refuge island exists REFUGE ISLAND EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and ramp cross slopes in island are not 2% or less RI_SLO_ISL_2 (FASLSE/UNCHECKED) Sidewalk SW_Issue01 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and width of sidewalk is <48" SW_WIDTH (<48") Sidewalk SW_Issue02 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and clear width to obstruction is <36" SW_CL_WID (<36") Sidewalk SW_Issue03 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and cross slope is >2% SW_CS (>2%) Sidewalk SW_Issue04 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% SW_GR_AW_INT (>8.33%) Sidewalk SW_Issue05 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and sidewalk landing is not present SW_LND (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Sidewalk SW_Issue06_Cracked SW_Issue06_Shattered If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and sidewalk condition is cracked or shattered SW_COND (CRACKED OR SHATTERED) Sidewalk SW_Issue07 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and there is a change in level surface along sidewalk greater then 1/4" SW_SURF_CH (TRUE/CHECKED) Sidewalk SW_Issue08 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of side SW_DROP (TRUE/CHECKED) Sidewalk SW_Issue09 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and there are overhead obstructions along sidewalk less then 84" SW_OH_OBS (TRUE/CHECKED) Sidewalk SW_Issue10 If sidewalk exists SIDEWALK EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" SW_MISS (TRUE/CHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue01 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons TO_BUTN_DIST (TRUE/CHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue02 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and push buttons aren't within 60" of the applicable crosswalk line TO_BUTN_CW_DIST (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue03 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and push button is not located within range of 30" 120" from curb line TO_BUTN_CL_DIST (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue04 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing TO_BUTN_PAR (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue05 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and distance from sidewalk to push button is not equal to or less then 10" TO_BUTN_DIST_FT (<.83') Traffic Ops TO_Issue06 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and there is not a level space at the push button TO_BUTN_SPACE (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue07 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and the height from the sidewalk to the center of the push button is not within 42" 48" TO_BUTN_HT (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue08 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and the push button is not operable TO_BUTN_OP (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue09 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and the push button is not accessible TO_BUTN_ACC (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Traffic Ops TO_Issue10 If pedestrian push button is present TO_BUTTON (TRUE/CHECKED) and there is no push button sign present TO_BUTN_SN (FALSE/UNCHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue01 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstruction is a sign OB_SIGN (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue02 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstruction is a mailbox OB_MBOX (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue03 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstuction is a fire hydrant OB_FHYD (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue04 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstrution is a bench OB_BENCH (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue05 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstruction is a telephone OB_TELE (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue06 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstruction is a traffic signal box OB_TRSC (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue07 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstruction is a newspaper box OB_NEWSB (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue08 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstruction is a drainage structure OB_DRSTR (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue09 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstruction is a tree grate OB_TRGR (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue10 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstrution is a pole mounted object OB_POLE (TRUE/CHECKED) Obstruction OB_Issue11 If obstruction exists OBSTRUCTION EXISTS (TRUE/CHECKED) and the obstruciton is standing water OB_WTR (TRUE/CHECKED) Prioritization_Scenarios_with_Queries_by_Issue(1).xlsx

125 C.3. Figure 1: How to Use the Index 72

126 Instructions The purpose of the included index is to guide the user through the ADA deficiencies at each intersection location. The index lists the intersections in order of deficiency ratings for each group of inspection locations. An index for each set of intersection groups will be produced; Priority 1 5, Priority 6 10, Priority 11 15, and Priority The applicable group is identified on the index in the top left corner. Each index is color coded with the types of ADA deficiencies that were identified during the inspection.

127 Column Phase I Priority Ranking shows the ranking assigned to each intersection during the Project Area Determination. Intersections were included if they were signalized and maintained by Lee County and/or were intersections of arterial and/or major collector roadways. Intersections were then categorized as urban/suburban/rural. Prioritization of inspection locations for Phase I were rated in hierarchy by their vicinity within: 1. 2 miles of an urban elementary school 2. ½ mile of an urban middle school 3. 2 miles of a suburban elementary school 4. ½ mile of an urban high school 5. ½ mile of a suburban middle school 6. ½ mile of a suburban high school 7. ½ mile of rural schools 8. None of the above. The lower the Phase I Priority Ranking, the higher the priority for planning necessary improvements.

128 Column Deficiency Rating shows the rating of the degree of ADA non compliance for each intersection. The higher the Deficiency Rating, the higher the degree of ADA non compliance. This rating is calculated using Microsoft Access using the detailed inspection reports. Values are based off of the assignments from the Prioritization of Types of ADA Deficiencies table. These values are also identified on the index with a short description of the deficiency identified directly above.

129 Prioritization of Types of ADA Deficiencies Priority Ranking Type Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Value 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists but cross walk does not 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is missing 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp 3 1 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% 3 1 Curb Ramp If sidewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't 3 1 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't 3 1 Mdi Median if median refuge exists it and no detectable dt tbl warnings exist it 3 1 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and detectable warnings do not exist 3 1 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and ramp slopes within island are not 8.33% or less 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and clear width to obstruction is <36" 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and sidewalk landing at top of ramp is not present 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and there is a change in level surface along sidewalk greater then 1/4" 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of side 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and there are overhead obstructions along sidewalk less then 84" 3 1 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" 3 1 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and distance from sidewalk to push button is not equal to or less then 10" 3 1 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and the push button is not operable 3 1 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and the push button is not accessible 3 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and doesn't extend full width 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" deep 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalks 2 2 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and the width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk 2 2 Driveways If driveway exists and cross slope of sidewalk crossing driveway is <2% 2 2 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and crosswalk width is less then 6' 2 2 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor 2 2 Median if median refuge exists and refuge width is <36" 2 2 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and pavement marking condition of minor crosswalk is poor 2 2 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and width of crosswalk from island to corner is <6' 2 2 Refuge Island If refuge island exists and ramp cross slopes in island are not 2% or less 2 2 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and width of sidewalk is <48" 2 2 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and cross slope is >2% 2 2 Sidewalk If sidewalk exists and sidewalk condition is cracked or shattered 2 2 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and push buttons aren't within 60" of the applicable crosswalk line 2 2 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and push button is not located within range of 30" 120" from curb line 2 2 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and there is not a level space at the push button 2 2 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and there is no push button sign present 2 3 Curb Ramp If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is not contrasting 1 3 Curb Ramp If curb ramp flare slopes are present and curb ramp flare slopes are greater then 8.33% 1 3 Driveways If driveway exists and driveway condition is cracked or shattered 1 3 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and crosswalk cross slope is >2% 1 3 Crosswalk if crosswalk exists and 48" extension in crosswalk for diagonal crossing does not exist 1 3 Sidewalk if no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use 1 3 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons 1 3 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing 1 3 Traffic Ops If pedestrian push button is present and the height from the sidewalk to the center of the push button is not within 42" 48" 1 Prioritization Scenarios.xlsx

130 The deficiency rating is the sum of all the type deficiencies found (whether related to curb ramps, crosswalks, sidewalks, medians, refuge islands, traffic operations, driveways, etc.). Note, the total in each box applies to the total of each type of deficiency at each intersection. For example, on intersection 3304 Cypress Lake Dr. & Winkler Rd., there is an 8 in the box for CR_Issue10 which is when a curb ramp exists and the ramp width is <48. Since this type of deficiency has a value of 2 assigned to it, we can ascertain that there are a total of 4 instances (8 divided by 2) at this intersection where a curb ramp is less than 48 wide. The user may choose to look at specific columns of the index, OR can reference the Findings and Recommendations for ADA Compliance which has been generated for each intersection. These reports summarize the existing conditions and list the recommendation of improvements at each location. The intersection reports that follow include: A findings/recommendation summary Inspection photos Intersection sketch The detailed inspection report These reports are placed in the binder in the order that they are listed on the applicable index.

131 C.4. Table 3: Priority 1-5 Intersections Index 78

132 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not If detectable warning exists and doesn't extend the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% If sidewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID CYPRESS LAKE DR & WINKLER RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & SOUTH POINTE BLVD COLLEGE PKWY & WINKLER RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & OVERLOOK DR LEE BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & EDISON LANE BONITA BEACH RD & IMPERIAL SHORES/WEST AVE BONITA BEACH RD & VANDERBILT/LUKE BONITA BEACH RD & ARROYAL RD COLLEGE PKWY & SOUTH POINTE BLVD COLLEGE PKWY & WHISKEY CREEK HOMESTEAD RD & TAYLOR LN COCONUT RD & VIA COCONUT POINT LEE BLVD & HAZELWOOD AV LEE BLVD & BELLA/WALMART COLLEGE PKWY & NEW BRITTANY/QUEEN ELIZABETH CYPRESS LAKE DR & SUMMERLIN RD BONITA BEACH RD & SPANISH WELLS LEE BLVD & WILLIAMS AVE LEELAND HEIGHTS BLVD & RICHMOND AV BONITA BEACH RD & OLD 41 RD BONITA BEACH RD & CENTER OF BONITA PLAZA BONITA BEACH RD & OAKLAND DR COLLEGE PKWY & RIVERWALK PARK BLVD BONITA BEACH RD & DOWNS DR LEE BLVD & LEELAND HEIGHTS BLVD Volume I

133 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not If detectable warning exists and doesn't extend the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% If sidewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID JOEL BLVD & BELL BLVD CYPRESS LAKE DR & PANTHER LN HOMESTEAD RD & ALABAMA RD/LEELAND HEIGHTS CORKSCREW RD & RIVER RANCH RD SUMMERLIN RD & EDISON LANE BONITA BEACH RD & IMPERIAL STREET HOMESTEAD RD & PLAZA DR THREE OAKS PKWY & COCONUT DR GUNNERY & 23RD ST SW SUMMERLIN RD (869) & COLLEGE PKWY HOMESTEAD RD & BETH STACEY BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFEN PKWY & FGCU CORKSCREW RD & THREE OAKS PKWY SUMMERLIN RD & LAKEWOOD BLVD LEE BLVD & GUNNERY RD CORKSCREW DR & VIA COCONUT POINT THREE OAKS PKWY & SAN CARLOS BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFIN & COLLEGE CLUB DR LEE BLVD & SUNSHINE BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFIN & GULF COAST DR/ MAIN ENTERANCE BEN HILL GRIFFIN & MIROMAR LAKES Williams Avenue & W 6th Street Richmond Avenue & 6th Street Bell Boulevard South & Milwaukee Boulevard SUMMERLIN RD & MAPLE BONITA BEACH RD & MANGO FIRE STATION Volume III Volume II

134 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not If detectable warning exists and doesn't extend the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% If sidewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID SUMMERLIN RD & PARK MEADOWS DR ESTERO & BEN HILL GRIFFIN Sanibel Boulevard & Lee Road ALICO RD & QUAKER RD Ben Hill Griffin Pkwy & FGCU Lakes Pkwy GUNNERY RD & 12TH ST W Homestead Road & Milwaukee Boulevard COLLEGE PKWY & CALOOSA YACHT & RACQUET Milwaukee Boulevard & Alabama Road Summerlin Road & Brantley Road ESTERO & THREE OAKS San Carlos Boulevard & Oriole Road North River Road & Broadway th Street W & Sunshine Boulevard th Street W & Sunniland Boulevard DANIELS PKWY & GATEWAY BLVD CAPE CORAL BR RD & MAGNOLIA PT Volume III

135 Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID CYPRESS LAKE DR & WINKLER RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & SOUTH POINTE BLVD COLLEGE PKWY & WINKLER RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & OVERLOOK DR LEE BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & EDISON LANE BONITA BEACH RD & IMPERIAL SHORES/WEST AVE BONITA BEACH RD & VANDERBILT/LUKE BONITA BEACH RD & ARROYAL RD COLLEGE PKWY & SOUTH POINTE BLVD COLLEGE PKWY & WHISKEY CREEK HOMESTEAD RD & TAYLOR LN COCONUT RD & VIA COCONUT POINT LEE BLVD & HAZELWOOD AV LEE BLVD & BELLA/WALMART COLLEGE PKWY & NEW BRITTANY/QUEEN ELIZABETH CYPRESS LAKE DR & SUMMERLIN RD BONITA BEACH RD & SPANISH WELLS LEE BLVD & WILLIAMS AVE LEELAND HEIGHTS BLVD & RICHMOND AV BONITA BEACH RD & OLD 41 RD BONITA BEACH RD & CENTER OF BONITA PLAZA BONITA BEACH RD & OAKLAND DR COLLEGE PKWY & RIVERWALK PARK BLVD BONITA BEACH RD & DOWNS DR LEE BLVD & LEELAND HEIGHTS BLVD Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies Volume I If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue

136 Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID JOEL BLVD & BELL BLVD CYPRESS LAKE DR & PANTHER LN HOMESTEAD RD & ALABAMA RD/LEELAND HEIGHTS CORKSCREW RD & RIVER RANCH RD SUMMERLIN RD & EDISON LANE BONITA BEACH RD & IMPERIAL STREET HOMESTEAD RD & PLAZA DR THREE OAKS PKWY & COCONUT DR GUNNERY & 23RD ST SW SUMMERLIN RD (869) & COLLEGE PKWY HOMESTEAD RD & BETH STACEY BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFEN PKWY & FGCU CORKSCREW RD & THREE OAKS PKWY SUMMERLIN RD & LAKEWOOD BLVD LEE BLVD & GUNNERY RD CORKSCREW DR & VIA COCONUT POINT THREE OAKS PKWY & SAN CARLOS BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFIN & COLLEGE CLUB DR LEE BLVD & SUNSHINE BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFIN & GULF COAST DR/ MAIN ENTERANCE BEN HILL GRIFFIN & MIROMAR LAKES Williams Avenue & W 6th Street Richmond Avenue & 6th Street Bell Boulevard South & Milwaukee Boulevard SUMMERLIN RD & MAPLE BONITA BEACH RD & MANGO FIRE STATION Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies Volume III Volume II If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue

137 Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID SUMMERLIN RD & PARK MEADOWS DR ESTERO & BEN HILL GRIFFIN Sanibel Boulevard & Lee Road ALICO RD & QUAKER RD Ben Hill Griffin Pkwy & FGCU Lakes Pkwy GUNNERY RD & 12TH ST W Homestead Road & Milwaukee Boulevard COLLEGE PKWY & CALOOSA YACHT & RACQUET Milwaukee Boulevard & Alabama Road Summerlin Road & Brantley Road ESTERO & THREE OAKS San Carlos Boulevard & Oriole Road North River Road & Broadway th Street W & Sunshine Boulevard th Street W & Sunniland Boulevard DANIELS PKWY & GATEWAY BLVD CAPE CORAL BR RD & MAGNOLIA PT Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies Volume III If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue

138 Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID CYPRESS LAKE DR & WINKLER RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & SOUTH POINTE BLVD COLLEGE PKWY & WINKLER RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & OVERLOOK DR LEE BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD CYPRESS LAKE DR & EDISON LANE BONITA BEACH RD & IMPERIAL SHORES/WEST AVE BONITA BEACH RD & VANDERBILT/LUKE BONITA BEACH RD & ARROYAL RD COLLEGE PKWY & SOUTH POINTE BLVD COLLEGE PKWY & WHISKEY CREEK HOMESTEAD RD & TAYLOR LN COCONUT RD & VIA COCONUT POINT LEE BLVD & HAZELWOOD AV LEE BLVD & BELLA/WALMART COLLEGE PKWY & NEW BRITTANY/QUEEN ELIZABETH CYPRESS LAKE DR & SUMMERLIN RD BONITA BEACH RD & SPANISH WELLS LEE BLVD & WILLIAMS AVE LEELAND HEIGHTS BLVD & RICHMOND AV BONITA BEACH RD & OLD 41 RD BONITA BEACH RD & CENTER OF BONITA PLAZA BONITA BEACH RD & OAKLAND DR COLLEGE PKWY & RIVERWALK PARK BLVD BONITA BEACH RD & DOWNS DR LEE BLVD & LEELAND HEIGHTS BLVD Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other Volume I If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If no push button sign is present Sign Mailbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Traffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tree Grate Pole Mounted Object Standing Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed

139 Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID JOEL BLVD & BELL BLVD CYPRESS LAKE DR & PANTHER LN HOMESTEAD RD & ALABAMA RD/LEELAND HEIGHTS CORKSCREW RD & RIVER RANCH RD SUMMERLIN RD & EDISON LANE BONITA BEACH RD & IMPERIAL STREET HOMESTEAD RD & PLAZA DR THREE OAKS PKWY & COCONUT DR GUNNERY & 23RD ST SW SUMMERLIN RD (869) & COLLEGE PKWY HOMESTEAD RD & BETH STACEY BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFEN PKWY & FGCU CORKSCREW RD & THREE OAKS PKWY SUMMERLIN RD & LAKEWOOD BLVD LEE BLVD & GUNNERY RD CORKSCREW DR & VIA COCONUT POINT THREE OAKS PKWY & SAN CARLOS BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFIN & COLLEGE CLUB DR LEE BLVD & SUNSHINE BLVD BEN HILL GRIFFIN & GULF COAST DR/ MAIN ENTERANCE BEN HILL GRIFFIN & MIROMAR LAKES Williams Avenue & W 6th Street Richmond Avenue & 6th Street Bell Boulevard South & Milwaukee Boulevard SUMMERLIN RD & MAPLE BONITA BEACH RD & MANGO FIRE STATION Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other Volume III Volume II If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If no push button sign is present Sign Mailbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Traffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tree Grate Pole Mounted Object Standing Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed

140 Priority 1 5 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID SUMMERLIN RD & PARK MEADOWS DR ESTERO & BEN HILL GRIFFIN Sanibel Boulevard & Lee Road ALICO RD & QUAKER RD Ben Hill Griffin Pkwy & FGCU Lakes Pkwy GUNNERY RD & 12TH ST W Homestead Road & Milwaukee Boulevard COLLEGE PKWY & CALOOSA YACHT & RACQUET Milwaukee Boulevard & Alabama Road Summerlin Road & Brantley Road ESTERO & THREE OAKS San Carlos Boulevard & Oriole Road North River Road & Broadway th Street W & Sunshine Boulevard th Street W & Sunniland Boulevard DANIELS PKWY & GATEWAY BLVD CAPE CORAL BR RD & MAGNOLIA PT Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other Volume III If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If no push button sign is present Sign Mailbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Traffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tree Grate Pole Mounted Object Standing Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed

141 C.5. Table 4: Priority 6-10 Intersections Index 88

142 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not etectable warning exists and doesn't end the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% idewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority 6 10 Intersections If d ext If si Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID PALM BEACH BLVD & NEW YORK DR PONDELLA RD & ORANGE GROVE BLVD BOY SCOUT DR & RAMSEY CYPRESS LAKE DR & REFLECTION LAKES PKWY SUMMERLIN RD (869) & RED CEDAR DR/CEDAR BEND BOY SCOUT DR & RED CEDAR DR DEL PRADO BLVD & CORAL POINT DR COLONIAL & DELEON ST CYPRESS LAKE DR & CYPRESS TRACE SUMMERLIN RD (869) & GLADIOLUS DR PONDELLA RD & APRIL LN FOWLER ST & WINKLER AVE SUMMERLIN RD (869) & WINKLER DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 20TH ST SUMMERLIN RD (869) & COLONIAL BLVD (884) DEL PRADO BLVD & BOLADO PKWY DANIELS PKWY & PLANTATION RD GLADIOLUS DR & WINKLER RD.RD SUMMERLIN RD (869) & BASS RD SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY & DANI DR DANIELS PKWY & BROOKSHIRE LAKE BLVD PONDELLA RD & MOODY RD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 6TH ST GLADIOLUS DR & LAKES PARK CARRELL & BROADWAY DEL PRADO BLVD & NE 6TH ST Volume II Volume I

143 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not etectable warning exists and doesn't end the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% idewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority 6 10 Intersections If d ext If si Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID SUMMERLIN RD (869) & PINE RIDGE RD SUMMERLIN RD (869) & BOY SCOUT DR DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 12TH TER SHOEMAKER BLVD & MICHIGAN AV FOWLER ST & N AIRPORT RD DEL PRADO BLVD & CORAL POINT MALL DANIELS PKWY & BELL TOWER RD GLADIOLUS DR & MAIDA ORTIZ AVE. AND TICE STREET SUMMERLIN RD & HORIZONS DANIELS PKWY & BRYNWOOD LN./BIG PINE WAY FOWLER ST & PAGE FIELD COMMONS SUMMERLIN RD (869) & ROYAL PALM SQUARE GLADIOLUS DR & PARKER LAKES GLADIOLUS DR & BASS RD ORTIZ AVE. AND BALLARD ROAD DANIELS PKWY & SIX MILE PKWY FOWLERST & CARRELLRD RD BROADWAY & HANSON PLANTATION RD & IDLEWILD ST SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY & CHALLENGER BLVD Six Mile Cypress & Plantation Road SUMMERLIN RD (869) & MATTHEWS DR GLADIOLUS DR & PINE RIDGE RD ORTIZ AVE. AND LUCKETT ROAD GLADIOLUS DR & HAGIE DR Volume III Volume II

144 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not etectable warning exists and doesn't end the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% idewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority 6 10 Intersections If d ext If si Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID Ballard Road & Marsh Avenue COLONIAL & TREELINE DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 22ND TER Six Mile Cypress & Penzance Blvd Six Mile Cypress & WinklerAve Burnt Store Road & Ceitus Parkway GLADIOLUS DR & A&W BULB RD TREELINE & PELICAN PRESERVE FIRE STATION Orange River Boulevard & Orange River Boulevard PINE RIDGE RD & FIRE STATION Hart Road & Laurel Drive Diplomat Parkway & Corbett Road Tice Street & Country Lakes Drive Volume III

145 Priority 6 10 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID PALM BEACH BLVD & NEW YORK DR PONDELLA RD & ORANGE GROVE BLVD BOY SCOUT DR & RAMSEY CYPRESS LAKE DR & REFLECTION LAKES PKWY SUMMERLIN RD (869) & RED CEDAR DR/CEDAR BEND BOY SCOUT DR & RED CEDAR DR DEL PRADO BLVD & CORAL POINT DR COLONIAL & DELEON ST CYPRESS LAKE DR & CYPRESS TRACE SUMMERLIN RD (869) & GLADIOLUS DR PONDELLA RD & APRIL LN FOWLER ST & WINKLER AVE SUMMERLIN RD (869) & WINKLER DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 20TH ST SUMMERLIN RD (869) & COLONIAL BLVD (884) DEL PRADO BLVD & BOLADO PKWY DANIELS PKWY & PLANTATION RD GLADIOLUS DR & WINKLER RD.RD SUMMERLIN RD (869) & BASS RD SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY & DANI DR DANIELS PKWY & BROOKSHIRE LAKE BLVD PONDELLA RD & MOODY RD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 6TH ST GLADIOLUS DR & LAKES PARK CARRELL & BROADWAY DEL PRADO BLVD & NE 6TH ST Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue Volume II Volume I

146 Priority 6 10 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID LOCATION SUMMERLIN RD (869) & PINE RIDGE RD SUMMERLIN RD (869) & BOY SCOUT DR DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 12TH TER SHOEMAKER BLVD & MICHIGAN AV FOWLER ST & N AIRPORT RD DEL PRADO BLVD & CORAL POINT MALL DANIELS PKWY & BELL TOWER RD GLADIOLUS DR & MAIDA ORTIZ AVE. AND TICE STREET SUMMERLIN RD & HORIZONS DANIELS PKWY & BRYNWOOD LN./BIG PINE WAY FOWLER ST & PAGE FIELD COMMONS SUMMERLIN RD (869) & ROYAL PALM SQUARE GLADIOLUS DR & PARKER LAKES GLADIOLUS DR & BASS RD ORTIZ AVE. AND BALLARD ROAD DANIELS PKWY & SIX MILE PKWY FOWLER ST & CARRELL RD BROADWAY & HANSON PLANTATION RD & IDLEWILD ST SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY & CHALLENGER BLVD Six Mile Cypress & Plantation Road SUMMERLIN RD (869) & MATTHEWS DR GLADIOLUS DR & PINE RIDGE RD ORTIZ AVE. AND LUCKETT ROAD GLADIOLUS DR & HAGIE DR Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue Volume III Volume II

147 Priority 6 10 Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID LOCATION Ballard Road & Marsh Avenue COLONIAL & TREELINE DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 22ND TER Six Mile Cypress & Penzance Blvd Six Mile Cypress & WinklerAve Burnt Store Road & Ceitus Parkway GLADIOLUS DR & A&W BULB RD TREELINE & PELICAN PRESERVE FIRE STATION Orange River Boulevard & Orange River Boulevard PINE RIDGE RD & FIRE STATION Hart Road & Laurel Drive Diplomat Parkway & Corbett Road Tice Street & Country Lakes Drive Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue Volume III

148 Priority 6 10 Intersections Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If n Sign Ma o push button sign is present ilbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Tra ffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tre Pol Sta e Grate e Mounted Object nding Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID PALM BEACH BLVD & NEW YORK DR PONDELLA RD & ORANGE GROVE BLVD BOY SCOUT DR & RAMSEY CYPRESS LAKE DR & REFLECTION LAKES PKWY SUMMERLIN RD (869) & RED CEDAR DR/CEDAR BEND BOY SCOUT DR & RED CEDAR DR DEL PRADO BLVD & CORAL POINT DR COLONIAL & DELEON ST CYPRESS LAKE DR & CYPRESS TRACE SUMMERLIN RD (869) & GLADIOLUS DR PONDELLA RD & APRIL LN FOWLER ST & WINKLER AVE SUMMERLIN RD (869) & WINKLER DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 20TH ST SUMMERLIN RD (869) & COLONIAL BLVD (884) DEL PRADO BLVD & BOLADO PKWY DANIELS PKWY & PLANTATION RD GLADIOLUS DR & WINKLER RD.RD SUMMERLIN RD (869) & BASS RD SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY & DANI DR DANIELS PKWY & BROOKSHIRE LAKE BLVD PONDELLA RD & MOODY RD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 6TH ST GLADIOLUS DR & LAKES PARK CARRELL & BROADWAY DEL PRADO BLVD & NE 6TH ST MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed Volume II Volume I

149 Priority 6 10 Intersections Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If n Sign Ma o push button sign is present ilbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Tra ffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tre Pol Sta e Grate e Mounted Object nding Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use Value Assigned to Deficiency PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID LOCATION SUMMERLIN RD (869) & PINE RIDGE RD SUMMERLIN RD (869) & BOY SCOUT DR DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 12TH TER SHOEMAKER BLVD & MICHIGAN AV FOWLER ST & N AIRPORT RD DEL PRADO BLVD & CORAL POINT MALL DANIELS PKWY & BELL TOWER RD GLADIOLUS DR & MAIDA ORTIZ AVE. AND TICE STREET SUMMERLIN RD & HORIZONS DANIELS PKWY & BRYNWOOD LN./BIG PINE WAY FOWLER ST & PAGE FIELD COMMONS SUMMERLIN RD (869) & ROYAL PALM SQUARE GLADIOLUS DR & PARKER LAKES GLADIOLUS DR & BASS RD ORTIZ AVE. AND BALLARD ROAD DANIELS PKWY & SIX MILE PKWY FOWLER ST & CARRELL RD BROADWAY & HANSON PLANTATION RD & IDLEWILD ST SIX MILE CYPRESS PKWY & CHALLENGER BLVD Six Mile Cypress & Plantation Road SUMMERLIN RD (869) & MATTHEWS DR GLADIOLUS DR & PINE RIDGE RD ORTIZ AVE. AND LUCKETT ROAD GLADIOLUS DR & HAGIE DR MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed Volume III Volume II

150 Priority 6 10 Intersections Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If n Sign Ma o push button sign is present ilbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Tra ffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tre Pol Sta e Grate e Mounted Object nding Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use Value Assigned to Deficiency PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID LOCATION Ballard Road & Marsh Avenue COLONIAL & TREELINE DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 22ND TER Six Mile Cypress & Penzance Blvd Six Mile Cypress & WinklerAve Burnt Store Road & Ceitus Parkway GLADIOLUS DR & A&W BULB RD TREELINE & PELICAN PRESERVE FIRE STATION Orange River Boulevard & Orange River Boulevard PINE RIDGE RD & FIRE STATION Hart Road & Laurel Drive Diplomat Parkway & Corbett Road Tice Street & Country Lakes Drive MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed Volume III

151 C.6. Table 5: Priority Intersections Index 98

152 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not etectable warning exists and doesn't end the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% idewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority Intersections If d ext If si Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 40TH TER VETERANS PKWY & SKYLINE BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & VETERANS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 28TH TER VETERANS PKWY & COUNTRY CLUBBLVD BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 47TH TER DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 27TH ST DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 36TH TER ALICO RD & LEE RD DEL PRADO BLVD & PALACO GRANDE PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 46TH ST VETERANS PKWY & CHIQUITA BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 32ND TER DEL PRADO BLVD & CAPE CORAL PKWY E DEL PRADO BLVD & CORNWALLIS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SAVONA PKWY VETERANS PKWY & SURFSIDE BLVD SANTA BARBARA & VETERANS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & BEACH PKWY BEN HILL GRIFFIN PKWY & MIROMAR OUTLET DR DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 26TH ST Pine Island Road & Stringfellow Road CORKSCREW RD & MIROMAR OUTLET MALL Buckingham Road & Riverdale HS THREE OAKS PARKWAY & WILLIAMS RD Oriole Road & Alico Road

153 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not etectable warning exists and doesn't end the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% idewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority Intersections If d ext If si Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID ALICO & BEN HILL GRIFFIN PKWY Lee Road & San Carlos Boulevard SW 20th Avenue & Veterans Memorial Parkway CORKSCREW RD & STONEYBROOK GOLF DR

154 Priority Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 40TH TER VETERANS PKWY & SKYLINE BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & VETERANS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 28TH TER VETERANS PKWY & COUNTRY CLUB BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 47TH TER DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 27TH ST DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 36TH TER ALICO RD & LEE RD DEL PRADO BLVD & PALACO GRANDE PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 46TH ST VETERANS PKWY & CHIQUITA BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 32ND TER DEL PRADO BLVD & CAPE CORAL PKWY E DEL PRADO BLVD & CORNWALLIS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SAVONA PKWY VETERANS PKWY & SURFSIDE BLVD SANTA BARBARA & VETERANS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & BEACH PKWY BEN HILL GRIFFIN PKWY & MIROMAR OUTLET DR DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 26TH ST Pine Island Road & Stringfellow Road Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue05 CORKSCREW RD & MIROMAR OUTLET MALL Buckingham Road & Riverdale HS THREE OAKS PARKWAY & WILLIAMS RD Oriole Road & Alico Road

155 Priority Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID ALICO & BEN HILL GRIFFIN PKWY Lee Road & San Carlos Boulevard SW 20th Avenue & Veterans Memorial Parkway CORKSCREW RD & STONEYBROOK GOLF DR Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue

156 Priority Intersections Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If n Sign Ma o push button sign is present ilbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Tra ffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tre Pol Sta e Grate e Mounted Object nding Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 40TH TER VETERANS PKWY & SKYLINE BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & VETERANS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 28TH TER VETERANS PKWY & COUNTRY CLUB BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 47TH TER DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 27TH ST DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 36TH TER ALICO RD & LEE RD DEL PRADO BLVD & PALACO GRANDE PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 46TH ST VETERANS PKWY & CHIQUITA BLVD DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 32ND TER DEL PRADO BLVD & CAPE CORAL PKWY E DEL PRADO BLVD & CORNWALLIS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & SAVONA PKWY VETERANS PKWY & SURFSIDE BLVD SANTA BARBARA & VETERANS PKWY DEL PRADO BLVD & BEACH PKWY BEN HILL GRIFFIN PKWY & MIROMAR OUTLET DR DEL PRADO BLVD & SE 26TH ST Pine Island Road & Stringfellow Road MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed CORKSCREW RD & MIROMAR OUTLET MALL Buckingham Road & Riverdale HS THREE OAKS PARKWAY & WILLIAMS RD Oriole Road & Alico Road

157 Priority Intersections Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If n Sign Ma o push button sign is present ilbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Tra ffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tre Pol Sta e Grate e Mounted Object nding Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID ALICO & BEN HILL GRIFFIN PKWY Lee Road & San Carlos Boulevard SW 20th Avenue & Veterans Memorial Parkway CORKSCREW RD & STONEYBROOK GOLF DR MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed

158 C.6. Table 5: Priority Intersections Index 105

159 Curb Ramp Deficiencies Crosswalk Deficiencies If curb ramps but crosswalk does not If detectable warning exists and doesn't extend the full width If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is <24" If curb ramp exists and the detectable warning surface is missing If curb ramp exists and detectable warning surface is deficient or detectable warnings surface is not contrasting If curb ramp exists and ramp cross slope is greater then 2% If curb ramp exists and ramp falls outside of marked crosswalk If curb ramp exists and ramp grade is greater then 8.33% If curb ramp exists and ramp width is <48" If curb ramp exists and obstructions are located within the ramp If curb ramp exists and gutter slopes are greater then 5% If curb flare slopes are present and exceed 8.33% If sidewalk exists and curb ramp doesn't If width of the curb ramp is less then the width of the adjoining sidewalk If crosswalk exists and the width is <6' If crosswalk exists and the cross slope is >2% If crosswalk exists and pavement marking condition is poor If crosswalk exists and curb ramp doesn't Priority Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency CR_Issue01 CR_Issue02 CR_Issue03 CR_Issue04 CR_Issue05 CR_Issue07 CR_Issue08 CR_Issue09 CR_Issue10 CR_Issue11 CR_Issue12 CR_Issue13 CR_Issue14 CR_Issue15 CW_Issue01 CW_Issue02 CW_Issue03 CW_Issue04 LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID LEE BLVD & ALVIN AV BONITA BEACH & LELY DANIELS PKWY & TREELINE RD TREELINE AVE & INTERCOM DR SUMMERLIN RD (869) & JOHN MORRIS RD NEW MCGREGOR & KELLY NEW MCGREGOR & JOHN MORRIS RD BONITA BEACH RD & BONITA GRANDE DR Lee Boulevard & Leonard Boulevard North DANIELS PKWY & PALOMINO/FIDDLESTICKS SUMMERLIN RD (869) & NEW MCGREGOR MCGREGOR BLVD & SHELL POINTE DANIELS PKWY & CHAMBERLIN BLVD Iona Road & John Morris Road Davis Road & McGregor Boulevard NEW MCGREGOR FIRE STATION/IONA MCGREG Davis Road & Iona Road DANIELS & SOPHMORE LN DANIELS PKWY & CROSS CREEK/AMERICAN COLONY DANIELS PKWY & DANPORT BLVD MCGREGOR BLVD & PUNTA RASSA RD Leonard Boulevard North & Westgate Boulevard

160 If sidewalk exists and width is <48" If clear width to obstructions in sidewalk are <36" If sidewalk cross slope is >2% If sidewalk grade away from intersection is >8.33% If sidewalk landing is not present If sidewalk is cracked If sidewalk is shattered If there is a change in level surface along the sidewalk >1/4" If there is a drop off greater then 4" on the front or back of sidewalk If there are overhead obstructions along the sidewalk <84" If there are missing sections or gaps along the sidewalk greater then 1/2" If driveway exists within 100' of intersection and the cross slope of the sidewalk crossing the driveway is >2% If driveway is cracked If driveway is shattered If refuge island exists and detectable warnings are not present If pavement marking of crosswalk to refuge island is in poor condition If crosswalk to refuge island is <6' wide If ramp slopes within refuge island exceed 8.33% If ramp cross slopes within refuge island exceed 2% Priority Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID LEE BLVD & ALVIN AV BONITA BEACH & LELY DANIELS PKWY & TREELINE RD TREELINE AVE & INTERCOM DR SUMMERLIN RD (869) & JOHN MORRIS RD NEW MCGREGOR & KELLY NEW MCGREGOR & JOHN MORRIS RD BONITA BEACH RD & BONITA GRANDE DR Lee Boulevard & Leonard Boulevard North DANIELS PKWY & PALOMINO/FIDDLESTICKS SUMMERLIN RD (869) & NEW MCGREGOR MCGREGOR BLVD & SHELL POINTE DANIELS PKWY & CHAMBERLIN BLVD Iona Road & John Morris Road Davis Road & McGregor Boulevard NEW MCGREGOR FIRE STATION/IONA MCGREG Davis Road & Iona Road DANIELS & SOPHMORE LN DANIELS PKWY & CROSS CREEK/AMERICAN COLONY DANIELS PKWY & DANPORT BLVD MCGREGOR BLVD & PUNTA RASSA RD Leonard Boulevard North & Westgate Boulevard Sidewalk Deficiencies Driveway Deficiencies Refuge Island Deficiencies SW_Issue01 SW_Issue02 SW_Issue03 SW_Issue04 SW_Issue05 SW_Issue06_Cr acked SW_Issue06_Sh attered SW_Issue07 SW_Issue08 SW_Issue09 SW_Issue10 DW_Issue01 DW_Issue02_Cr acked DW_Issue02_Sh attered RI_Issue01 RI_Issue02 RI_Issue03 RI_Issue04 RI_Issue

161 Priority Intersections Value Assigned to Deficiency LOCATION PHASE I PRIORITY RANKING DEFICIENCY RATING INT_ID LEE BLVD & ALVIN AV BONITA BEACH & LELY DANIELS PKWY & TREELINE RD TREELINE AVE & INTERCOM DR SUMMERLIN RD (869) & JOHN MORRIS RD NEW MCGREGOR & KELLY NEW MCGREGOR & JOHN MORRIS RD BONITA BEACH RD & BONITA GRANDE DR Lee Boulevard & Leonard Boulevard North DANIELS PKWY & PALOMINO/FIDDLESTICKS SUMMERLIN RD (869) & NEW MCGREGOR MCGREGOR BLVD & SHELL POINTE DANIELS PKWY & CHAMBERLIN BLVD Iona Road & John Morris Road Davis Road & McGregor Boulevard NEW MCGREGOR FIRE STATION/IONA MCGREG Davis Road & Iona Road DANIELS & SOPHMORE LN DANIELS PKWY & CROSS CREEK/AMERICAN COLONY DANIELS PKWY & DANPORT BLVD MCGREGOR BLVD & PUNTA RASSA RD Leonard Boulevard North & Westgate Boulevard Med. Pedestrian Traffic Operations Deficiencies Obstruction Deficiencies Other If median refuge exists and the refuge width is <36" If push buttons are within 120" of other push buttons If push buttons aren't within 60" of the appicable crosswalk line If push button is not located within 30" 120" from curb line If push button is not parallel to the applicable direction of crossing If distance from sidewalk to push button is not less then 15" If there is not a level space at the push button If the height from the sidewalk to the push button is not within 42" 48" If the push button is not operable If the push button is not accessible If no push button sign is present Sign Mailbox Fire hydrant Bench Telephone Traffic Signal Box Newspaper Box Drainage Structure Tree Grate Pole Mounted Object Standing Water If crosswalk is present and 48" diagonal extension for crossing doesn t exist If a median refuge 6' or greater exists and there are no detectable warnings If no sidewalk exists and there is obvious evidence of pedestrian use MD_Issue01 TO_Issue01 TO_Issue02 TO_Issue03 TO_Issue04 TO_Issue05 TO_Issue06 TO_Issue07 TO_Issue08 TO_Issue09 TO_Issue10 OB_Issue01 OB_Issue02 OB_Issue03 OB_Issue04 OB_Issue05 OB_Issue06 OB_Issue07 OB_Issue08 OB_Issue09 OB_Issue10 OB_Issue11 QC Observed QC Observed QC Observed

162 Adrienne A. Wisdom, P.E. Atkins 1514 Broadway, Suite 201 Fort Myers, FL Telephone: (239) Fax: (239) Atkins Ltd except where stated otherwise. The Atkins logo, Carbon Critical Design and the strapline Plan Design Enable are trademarks of Atkins Ltd.

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility ADA Transition Plan FY19-FY28 Date: November 5, 2018 Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The federal statute known as the Americans with Disabilities

More information

CITY OF PAPILLION, NEBRASKA

CITY OF PAPILLION, NEBRASKA CITY OF PAPILLION, NEBRASKA PROJECT REPORT For TRANSITION PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY April 2010 Introduction The City of Papillion created an initial Transition Plan in the

More information

ADA TRANSITION PLAN. TOWN OF DeMOTTE

ADA TRANSITION PLAN. TOWN OF DeMOTTE ADA TRANSITION PLAN TOWN OF DeMOTTE December 17, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Transition Plan Development... 2 A. ADA Coordinator... 2 B. Grievance Procedure... 2 C. Self-Evaluation and Inventory...

More information

Marshall County. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way

Marshall County. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Marshall County Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way 2012 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Transition Plan History and Overview... 1 Legal

More information

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements Prepared by: Public Works Department Engineering Division October 2015 Table of Contents Section I Introduction.. 3

More information

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Introduction 1 Purpose 2 Identified Obstacles to the Public Right of Way 3 Criteria for Determining Impediments at Village Facilities 4 Removing Barriers

More information

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN LEON COUNTY FOR CURB RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 1 P age

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN LEON COUNTY FOR CURB RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 1 P age AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN FOR CURB RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS 2015 LEON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 P age INTRODUCTION The goal of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition

More information

Traffic Calming Policy

Traffic Calming Policy Article I. Purpose and Goal. The purpose of this policy is to establish criteria and procedures the City will use to evaluate requests for, and if appropriate, implement traffic calming measures. Neighborhood

More information

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017

VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017 VDOT BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT April 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page(s) About this Guide 3 Encouraging development of bicycle and pedestrian plans by localities

More information

ADA TRANSITION PLAN. For

ADA TRANSITION PLAN. For Page 1 of 7 ADA TRANSITION PLAN For PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 121 SW Port St. Lucie Boulevard Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 Phone: 772-871-5177 Website: www.cityofpsl.com September 2018 Table of Contents 1) Introduction

More information

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10 Proposed City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Exhibit 10 1 City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Vision: The Complete Streets Vision is to develop a safe, efficient, and reliable travel

More information

Scope of Services BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MPO

Scope of Services BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MPO I. INTRODUCTION Scope of Services BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MPO The Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan was completed in 1997.

More information

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW GEORGETOWN SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW RESOURCES AND STANDARDS As part of the Master Plan process, a review and evaluation of current City documents and policies relevant to

More information

Section 9. Implementation

Section 9. Implementation Section 9. Implementation The transportation system is just one of many aspects that must be carefully planned to maintain and enhance the quality of living in Cecil County. The Cecil County Bicycle Plan

More information

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return Summary: Local return is an important revenue source for cities to maintain their local transportation infrastructure. Most cities use their local return to operate small bus systems and repave streets,

More information

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY CONTENTS Acknowledgments...vii Great Rivers Greenway District Board of Directors... vii Great Rivers Greenway District Staff... vii Project Consultants... vii Committees... viii Citizens Advisory Committee

More information

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County. Transportation PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NON-MOTORIZED PLAN CONTENTS Goals, Policies, and Action Strategies Table 4 (Bike Facility Classifications and Descriptions) Table 5 (Bike Facility

More information

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction: Introduction: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) has continued the efforts started through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency

More information

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES GEORGETOWN SIDEWALK MASTER PLAN 34% of funding is dedicated to Downtown Overlay District sidewalks 28% of funding is recommended within 1/4 mile of Southwestern University 26% of funding is recommended

More information

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office P139 STAFF REPORT f CITY NL- NAGER' S OFFICE RANCHO Date: C;UCAMONGA To: From: Subject: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's

More information

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation?

A Matter of Fairness: ROCOG s Environmental Justice Protocol. What is Mobility Limitation? No Person Left Behind What is Mobility Limitation? What is the Access Limitation? Environmental Justice population should be provided adequate mobility & access to meet their needs; Identify acceptable

More information

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014 MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy January 2014 1 Prepared by Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 Phone: 651-296-3000 Toll-Free:

More information

May 10, 2010 CITY OF FAIRWAY, KANSAS AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN

May 10, 2010 CITY OF FAIRWAY, KANSAS AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN City of Fairway, Kansas Transition Plan May 10, 2010 Page 1 May 10, 2010 CITY OF FAIRWAY, KANSAS AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN In 1990, the Federal Government enacted the Americans with

More information

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. Who determines the two (2) mile limit? Florida Statutes: 1006.21, Chapter 6A-3.001 (3), School Board Policy 503: A reasonable

More information

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Mobility 2040 Supported Goals Improve the availability of transportation options for people and goods. Support travel efficiency measures and system enhancements targeted at congestion

More information

Town of Wakarusa. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way

Town of Wakarusa. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Town of Wakarusa Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Legal Requirements... 1 Identified Obstacles to the

More information

The City of Miramar. ADA Self-Evaluation & Transition Plan. August 28, Prepared by: 600 N. Pine Island Road Suite Plantation, FL 33324

The City of Miramar. ADA Self-Evaluation & Transition Plan. August 28, Prepared by: 600 N. Pine Island Road Suite Plantation, FL 33324 The City of Miramar ADA Self-Evaluation & Transition Plan August 28, 2018 Prepared by: 600 N. Pine Island Road Suite 1300 450 Plantation, FL 33324 Table of Contents Abbreviations... iii 1.0 Purpose...

More information

VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE ADA TRANSITION PLAN

VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE ADA TRANSITION PLAN VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE ADA TRANSITION PLAN January 2017 The Village of Downers Grove s strategic goals include Exceptional Municipal Services and Top Quality Infrastructure. This document, which evaluates

More information

Living Streets Policy

Living Streets Policy Living Streets Policy Introduction Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create

More information

Town of Roseland. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way

Town of Roseland. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Town of Roseland Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Legal Requirements... 1 Identified Obstacles to the

More information

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017 Technical Working Group November 15, 2017 Welcome and Introductions Project Partners Regional Transportation District (RTD) Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Denver Regional Council of Governments

More information

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY CITY OF TULSA BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY 31, 2013 CITY OF TULSA ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CITY OF TULSA ADA TRANSITION

More information

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY I. VISION, GOALS & PRINCIPLES VISION To improve the streets of Portland making them safer and more accessible for all users including pedestrians,

More information

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project. TRAVEL PLAN Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Background... 7 Building Users... 7 Transportation in Community Consultation... 7 Summary

More information

2. Vision & Goals. Vision. Santa Rosa is a community where walking and bicycling are comfortable and convenient for people of all ages and abilities.

2. Vision & Goals. Vision. Santa Rosa is a community where walking and bicycling are comfortable and convenient for people of all ages and abilities. 2. Vision & Goals Overview The goals of the Santa Rosa Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update reflect the priorities expressed by the community throughout the public outreach phase of this Plan Update.

More information

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization To: Kyle Wagenschutz, City of Memphis CC: From: Anne Conlon and John Cock, Alta Planning + Design Date: December, 2014 Re: Project List Development (Task 3.1-3.2) and Project List Prioritization (Task

More information

Promoting Active Communities Award Application

Promoting Active Communities Award Application Promoting Active Communities Award Application Michigan s Promoting Active Communities (PAC) assessment and award application is available for online completion and submission at www.mihealthtools.org/communities.

More information

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies Adopted August 6, 2015 by Ordinance No. 1591 VIII MOBILITY ELEMENT Table of Contents Page Number

More information

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years 5. Pedestrian System Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and its partner agencies recognize the importance of improving pedestrian mobility.

More information

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council Input to the Update of the Florida Transportation Plan March 2015 This document presents input from the Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council

More information

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY Introduction Performance measures are helpful in evaluating the progress being made toward achieving the goals and objectives of the Gateway Bicycle Plan. The Plan

More information

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 13, 2016 TO: FROM: City Council Bob Brown, Community Development Director Russ Thompson, Public Works Director Patrick Filipelli, Management Analyst 922 Machin Avenue

More information

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1 Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1 Transportation facilities no longer mean just accommodating a vehicle powered by a combustion engine. Pedestrian and non-motorized facilities are important modes of travel

More information

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX May 24, 2009 Pedestrian Demand Index for State Highway Facilities Revised: May 29, 2007 Introduction

More information

Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009

Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009 Rochester Downtown Bicycle Study 2009 Relationship of ROCOG Long Range Transportation Plan to Rochester Comprehensive Plan Regional Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is prepared under the auspices

More information

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines I. Purpose: The City of Elizabeth City is committed to ensure the overall safety and livability of residential neighborhoods. One

More information

Town of Bourbon. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way

Town of Bourbon. Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Town of Bourbon Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Legal Requirements... 1 Identified Obstacles to the

More information

Review of Considerations and Requirements for Automated Enforcement

Review of Considerations and Requirements for Automated Enforcement Review of Considerations and Requirements for Automated Enforcement Summary: The purpose of this report is to provide information related to expanding the use of automated enforcement in the City of Toronto,

More information

CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL Page 1 of 7 DEPARTMENT: Engineering Services SUBJECT: Traffic Calming Policy (Revised June 6, 2017) Policy Statement: The provision of traffic calming measures

More information

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies Mobilizing 5 This chapter outlines the overarching goals, action statements, and action items Long Beach will take in order to achieve its vision of

More information

ARKANSAS SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR WALKING SCHOOL BUS AND BICYCLE TRAIN FUNDING Application Instructions

ARKANSAS SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR WALKING SCHOOL BUS AND BICYCLE TRAIN FUNDING Application Instructions Application Instructions This is an electronic application. Simply fill out your response in each input box (as you type the box will expand and carriage return). You can input your answers online and

More information

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008 SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008 To assist VTA and Member Agencies in the planning, development and programming of bicycle improvements in Santa Clara County. Vision Statement To establish,

More information

FORT MYERS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

FORT MYERS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY MEETING DATE: October 3, 2011 Regular Special Workshop Proclamations & Special Presentations Consent Public Hearings MOTION: Adopt resolution initiating the process of developing guidelines, processes,

More information

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy City Commission Policy 600 Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy DEPARTMENT: Public Works DATE ADOPTED: June 7, 1995 DATE OF LAST REVISION: December 10, 2014 Policy No. 600.01 AUTHORITY: PASS City of Tallahassee-Leon

More information

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Yale University Human Research Protection Program Yale University Human Research Protection Program HRPP Policy 700 Noncompliance, Suspension and Termination Responsible Office Office of Research Administration Effective Date: February 10, 2009 Responsible

More information

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION BACKGROUND Active transportation, also known as nonmotorized transportation, is increasingly recognized as an important consideration when planning and

More information

Double the amount of bicycle ridership while at the same time reducing the number of bicycle crashes by one-third.

Double the amount of bicycle ridership while at the same time reducing the number of bicycle crashes by one-third. CHAPTER 6 Recommended Policies and Action Items To achieve the goals stated in Chapter 1 and guide implementation of the Bicycle Plan, policies and action items have been identified. They are presented

More information

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities Approved: Policy: 20-004(P) Responsible Office: Planning Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities I. POLICY STATEMENT: This policy

More information

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary Prepared by: February 28, 2011 Why Plan? Encouraging healthy, active lifestyles through pathway and sidewalk connectivity has been a focus

More information

MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Monday, June 22, 2015 5:30 p.m., Regular Meeting PERMIT CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM 1950 Parkside Drive,

More information

Installation of Traffic Signals and Pedestrian Crossings

Installation of Traffic Signals and Pedestrian Crossings SER-009-021 Strathcona County Municipal Policy Handbook Installation of Traffic Signals and Pedestrian Crossings Date of Approval by Council: 04/16/91; 06/12/2007 Resolution No. 325/91; 526/2007 Lead Role:

More information

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017 Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview TAB September 20, 2017 Bicycling & Walking in the Twin Cities Where are we now? The Bike-Pedestrian system Current trends New developments Where are we

More information

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control

MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control MUTCD Part 6: Temporary Traffic Control OMUTCD English units are preferred. OHIO MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1. GENERAL Chapter

More information

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments 1 INTRODUCTION Maintaining a high quality of life is the essence of this plan for transit and non-motorized transportation in Butte County. Curbing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by reducing congestion,

More information

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY RESOLUTION NO. 2018-?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY WHEREAS, safe, convenient, and accessible transportation for all users is a priority of the City of Neptune

More information

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION Achieving the vision of the Better Streets Plan will rely on the ability to effectively fund, build and maintain improvements, and to sustain improvements over time. CHAPTER

More information

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy INTRODUCTION The Complete Streets guidelines build upon multiple efforts and promote a multimodal transportation system that is integrated and sustains land use

More information

BIKE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT. November 2006

BIKE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT. November 2006 BIKE & PEDESTRIAN IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR LOCALITY INVOLVEMENT November 2006 1 of 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page(s) Encouraging development of Bike and pedestrian plans by localities 3 5 Involving localities

More information

ACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments

ACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments Note: Definitions for each drop down menu appear as Comments (scroll over the column title or in the Review mode, choose

More information

BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC)

BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) Position: BPAC Committee Member Purpose and Duties of BPAC Committee Member: The City of Rolla is in the process of forming a Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary Executive Summary Background... ES-1 Pedestrian Network... ES-2 Bikeway Network... ES-2 Collision History... ES-2 Public Input... ES-4 Conclusions and Recommendations... ES-4 1. Introduction and Setting

More information

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Community Task Force November 15, 2017 Community Task Force November 15, 2017 Welcome and Introductions Project Partners Regional Transportation District (RTD) Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Denver Regional Council of Governments

More information

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES (Adopted by the Town Council on June 30, 2004) (Revised December 6, 2010) (Revised February 8, 2016) POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC

More information

Introduction.

Introduction. 2307-1.0. Introduction. Delaware s Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program was established September 10, 2002 when Governor Ruth Ann Minner signed Senate Bill 353 of the 141st General Assembly of Delaware

More information

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary 3 II. When Is A Bicycle Pedestrian Transit Assessment (BPTA) Required? 4 III.

More information

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road West Dimond Blvd Jodhpur St to Sand Lake CSS Transportation Project Summary Municipality of Anchorage Project # 05 005 Project Manager: John Smith, P.E. (MOA PM&E) Project Administrator: Julie Makela,

More information

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background Douglas County Table of Contents Existing Infrastructure 86 Funding 89 Policy and Program Recommendations 90 Infrastructure Recommendations 92 Conclusion 95 Background Home to 4,500 residents and Baker

More information

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation Mixed Use Centers Complete Streets Guidelines Project Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation December 10, 2008 Project Objectives: Conduct an inter-departmental and agency process to study

More information

CITY OF SAN JOSÉ, CALIFORNIA DETAILED ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE FOR SIDEWALKS REVISED DRAFT - MARCH 20, 2008

CITY OF SAN JOSÉ, CALIFORNIA DETAILED ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE FOR SIDEWALKS REVISED DRAFT - MARCH 20, 2008 CITY OF SAN JOSÉ, CALIFORNIA DETAILED ADA TRANSITION PLAN UPDATE FOR SIDEWALKS REVISED DRAFT - MARCH 20, 2008 Submitted by: Alta Planning + Design Logan Hopper Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Topic

More information

Americans with Disabilities Act Hennepin County Program Access And Transition Plan For County Highway Rights of Way

Americans with Disabilities Act Hennepin County Program Access And Transition Plan For County Highway Rights of Way Americans with Disabilities Act Hennepin Program Access And Transition Plan For Highway Rights of Way Released August 2015 Version: 201503 8/31/2015 3:19:00 PM HOW TO USE THIS REPORT This report on Hennepin

More information

ADA Retrofits Triggered by Paving: What, When, and Why

ADA Retrofits Triggered by Paving: What, When, and Why ADA Retrofits Triggered by Paving: What, When, and Why Ron Franzen NWR Project Development Trainer & Statewide ADA Trainer Regional ADA Coordination Team NWR Engineering Services Paula Hammond Secretary

More information

GOLF OPERATIONS MANAGER NF

GOLF OPERATIONS MANAGER NF GOLF OPERATIONS MANAGER NF-1101-03 INTRODUCTION Works under the general supervision of the Regional Golf Operations Manager and is responsible for the supervising, planning, coordinating and managing the

More information

Complete Streets and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Jennifer E. Ruley, PE Active Transportation Engineer Louisiana Public Health Institute

Complete Streets and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Jennifer E. Ruley, PE Active Transportation Engineer Louisiana Public Health Institute Complete Streets and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Jennifer E. Ruley, PE Active Transportation Engineer Louisiana Public Health Institute Important Video What words apply here? For either initiative

More information

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years) 12 RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations are based on the technical analysis of existing and future road and active transportation conditions, the results of the review of existing City policies and public feedback.

More information

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report Page 1 MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report August 1, 2012 MAG Project #481 Page 2 Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report Introduction

More information

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions Chapter 2 Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions Chapter 2: Policies and Actions The Bicycle Master Plan provides a road map for making bicycling in Bellingham a viable transportation

More information

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY POLICY OBJECTIVE: The City of Bloomington will enhance safety, mobility, accessibility and convenience for transportation network users of all ages and abilities,

More information

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016 Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing May 2016 Overview 10-Year Transit Development Plan Premium Transit Network Columbia Pike service concept Premium amenities

More information

5.0 Roadway System Plan

5.0 Roadway System Plan Southwest Boise Transportation Study Page 16 5.0 Roadway System Plan The Roadway System Plan outlines roadway improvements in the Initial Study Area. It forecasts future deficiencies on the arterial system,

More information

The University of Georgia Automated External Defibrillator (AED) Program Guidelines

The University of Georgia Automated External Defibrillator (AED) Program Guidelines The University of Georgia Automated External Defibrillator (AED) Program Guidelines Purpose The University of Georgia (UGA) is committed to providing a safe and healthy environment for all faculty, staff,

More information

4 Goals, Objectives & Actions

4 Goals, Objectives & Actions Chapter4 4 This chapter presents goals, objectives, and recommended actions to support the vision of making Overland Park a safer and easier place to ride a bicycle. 35 4.1 Recommendations Structure The

More information

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION No. 15-031 WHEREAS, Transportation Code Division II, Section 909 authorizes the Director of Transportation to install and permit

More information

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:

More information

CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY VERSION: 1.0 April 10, 2012 Pedestrians, Cyclists and Motorists Sharing Street Spaces CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 POLICY GOAL... 3 POLICY OBJECTIVES... 3 GUIDING

More information

The procedures to be followed in undertaking Non-Emergency work depend on the degree of traffic disruption caused by the work.

The procedures to be followed in undertaking Non-Emergency work depend on the degree of traffic disruption caused by the work. APPENDIX G TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR UTILITY WORK WITHIN ROADWAY RIGHTS- OF-WAY JUNE 2001 Scope of Guidelines These traffic control guidelines cover work performed by utility companies and/or their

More information

Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy

Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy I. Scope of Policy Many students attending E.O. Smith High School are transported by local boards of education, through written agreements with those

More information

Kelowna On the Move. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan

Kelowna On the Move. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Kelowna On the Move Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Executive Summary April 2016 Purpose of the Plan The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan identifies infrastructure, planning, and policy requirements

More information

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary A world-class multi-modal transportation system is essential to a vibrant city and better quality of life. -Mayor Barry The WalknBike plan aims

More information

Prince George s County Council Retreat January 5, 2017

Prince George s County Council Retreat January 5, 2017 Rushern L. Baker, III County Executive Darrell B. Mobley Director Prince George s County Council Retreat January 5, 2017 DPW&T STRUCTURE AND SERVICES Office of Transportation: Fixed route transit service

More information

ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way

ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way 2014 NWPMA Conference Akmal Siddiqui WSDOT Local Programs 310 Maple Park Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504 Phone: 360-705-7539 siddiqa@wsdot.wa.gov

More information