World of Football Refereeing Referee Observation Report

Transcription

1 World of Football Refereeing Referee Observation Report MATCH FACTS Group B, Matchday 1 09 June :45 CET Arena Lviv Lviv GOALS 10 Mario GOMEZ (GER, 72 ) GERMANY 1:0 PORTUGAL YELLOW CARDS Hélder POSTIGA (POR, 13 ) Holger BADSTUBER (GER, 43 ) Fábio COENTRÃO (POR, 60 ) Jérôme BOATENG (GER, 69 ) SENDING OFFS MATCH OFFICIALS Function Full Name Origin Final Mark Referee Stéphane Lannoy ENG 78,0 Assistant Referee 1 Frédéric Cano ENG 76,0 Assistant Referee 2 Michaël Annonier ENG 78,0 Additional Assistant Referee 1 Fredy Fautrel ENG 76,0 Additional Assistant Referee 2 Ruddy Buquet ENG 100,0 Fourth Official Marcin Borski POL 75,0 Reserve Assistant Referee Marcin Borkowski POL 75,0 UEFA Delegate Jozef Kliment UEFA Referee Observer David Elleray Blog Referee Observer(s) Chefren Remarks concerning the final marks The final marks that have been awarded by the Blog Referee Observer(s) for every official are aimed at epressing a general assessment on the respective official s performance. They comply with certain and different evaluation scales that are eposed and eplained in the Referee Observation Checklist (a separate document). SVK ENG ITA

2 The Referee Background This was the second game of the first matchday in group B, after the surprising Denmark win against the Netherlands, Germany and Portugal faced in this match in Lviv, Ukraine. The stadium had a great atmosphere, with a considerable attendance, anyway it s also important to underline the neutral pitch, so the referee could not have this kind of pressure from people on the stands. The match in his progress didn t show many challenging or hard decisions to take, anyway it was quite intense and we can point out several situations, including an important decision by the second additional assistant, Ruddy Buquet. Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty and Importance II. CONTROL Comment Thanks also to the players fairness, Lannoy had a good control of the match, he showed leadership and authority, there were never riots or tense moments. His ability was also to convince the players about his decisions. Eemplary situations that strengthen the general impression Parameter Mark 2: Control III. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game Comment (advice: always refer to aspects like card management, infringement detection, the application of the advantage rule, holding in the penalty area after set pieces, simulation and lay etra ordinary high emphasis on match influencing or even decisive decisions) Overall, he had a good foul detection. Probably he whistled a bit more than he needed, that includes also small and slight contacts, but finally there weren t considerable mistakes and the given cards were correct. He could have applied more the advantage rule. No important situations in the penalty areas, neither simulations. The crucial and decisive decision was taken by his additional assistant. Furthermore, the second assistant referee had to evaluate an offside situation. Important Decisions ((non)given cards should be mentioned, other important decisions in the opinion of the observer) Yellow card to Hélder Postiga, correct. Dangerous tackle on the legs of the 13 keeper Neuer, when the ball was already away. Raul Meireles committed foul on Khedira: correct free kick but he advantage 24 rule would have been more adequate. Yellow card to Badstuber: it was correct, the German player committed a 43 crucial foul, in order to stop Nani, which was running towards the area.

3 Ecellent reading of the situation by the referee, the contact was difficult to see and the replay showed it. 45 No goal: correct decision, thank to the second additional assistant Buquet. 52 Miguel Veloso pulled softly the shirt of Khedira, being anyway in a advantage position: free kick accorded by referee, harsh decision in that case. 60 Fábio Coentrão got a yellow card after a foul on Schweinsteiger. Correct decision: tackle on the legs. 69 Boateng got a yellow card because he stopped the action of Cristiano Ronaldo in a blatant way. 82 Özil offside: correct call minutes as additional time was an adequate choice, and he had also to add further time due to a substitution in the last seconds of the match. Parameter Mark 3: Decisions IV. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Epected Always close to the play, follows play at all times, and does not interfere with play Fleible Diagonal System Able to anticipate the action Enters the penalty area when necessary Appropiate, efficient and economic Positioning also at set pieces Physical Condition in general Adequate behaviour in dealing with injuries (awareness of serious injuries, possible advantages applied, cardtiming etc.) Comment He showed a good fitness, and his physical condition was at epected. Something to improve, about advantage rule. He could have used the advantage, but he whistled too early, stopping in this 24 way a potentially dangerous action in Portuguese area. Parameter Mark 4.1: Physical and Technical Aspects AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 70,0 Tactical Approach The referee has a certain tactical approach, which is moving in the measures the Laws of the Game define, which is understood and consistent The referee s tactical approach is active, he is able to predict situations and to avoid conflicts by that Personality and authority on the pitch Adequate communication Epected

4 Shows determination and courage in his decisions and has also tools to gain authority (adequate and clear gestures, using his whistle as kind of language) Shows respect Comment He showed his ability in communication with players and also respect. Although his decision to whistle not giving the advantage was controversial, he was able to convince players and to stop complaints. He showed also the needed authority when he had to instruct the players before free kicks. Parameter Mark 4.2: Tactical Approach Summary of both sections (if necessary, give the minutes) Positive Points 1. Authority, communication, clear gestures. 2. Fitness. Points for improvement 1. Advantage rule 2. Comment on the cooperation within the referee team He was helped without problems by his assistants and the cooperation was good. The most important decision of the match was taken thank to an ecellent teamwork. Parameter Mark 4: Style (factorized (50%) sum of both partial sections) FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) REFEREE MATCH DIFFICULTY / IMPORTANCE 10 % 75 CONTROL 20 % 80 DECISIONS 40 % 80 STYLE 30 % 75 Final mark 78,0

5 Assistant Referee 1 Comment He had not offside situations to solve, anyway he helped the referee in some situations, reporting fouls. Not so much involved, his performance was at epected Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty (only aspects concerning the AR1) AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 65,0 II. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game Comment Overview (Non)Offside detection (evaluated independently (!) from the difficulty of the (non)offside situations) Quality of other decisions with regard to the application of the Laws of the Game Epected Important Decisions (of course heavy attention to be paid on (non)offside decisions) Parameter Mark 2: Decisions III. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Physical Condition Positioning and movement Adequate alertness, mental awareness and concentration (e.g. decisions on situations happening in his area of vicinity) Holds and moves his flag in accordance with the Laws of the Game Epected Parameter Mark 3: Style FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) AR1 MATCH DIFFICULTY 20 % 65 DECISIONS 60 % 80 STYLE 20 % 75 Final mark 76,0

6 Assistant Referee 2 Comment He had to raise the flag in just one situation, and it was a difficult offside to see. Furthermore, easy decision in the situation of 10 scored by Mario Gomez. Of course, the decision about the ball on the goal line in first half, was taken by Buquet, which was closer to action. Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty (only aspects concerning the AR2) II. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game Comment He showed concentration in the only important and difficult decision to take, about an offside. Overview (Non)Offside detection (evaluated independently (!) from the difficulty of the (non)offside situations) Quality of other decisions with regard to the application of the Laws of the Game Epected Important Decisions (of course heavy attention to be paid on (non)offside decisions) Mario Gomez was correctly evaluated in a regular position, anyway it was 72 easy to see. 81 Özil offside: correct and difficult call. Parameter Mark 2: Decisions III. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Physical Condition Positioning and movement Adequate alertness, mental awareness and concentration (e.g. decisions on situations happening in his area of vicinity) Holds and moves his flag in accordance with the Laws of the Game Epected Parameter Mark 3: Style

7 FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) AR2 MATCH DIFFICULTY 20 % 75 DECISIONS 60 % 80 STYLE 20 % 75 Final mark 78,0 Additional Assistant Referee 1 Comment He had a calm evening, and he wasn t involved in important decisions to take. Anyway, he showed concentration all match long. Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty (only aspects concerning the AAR1) AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 65,0 II. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game, Involvement Comment Overview Important decisions in the penalty area (e.g. fouls like holding after set pieces, goaldecisions etc.) Quality of other decisions with regard to the application of the Laws of the Game Epected Important Decisions Parameter Mark 2: Decisions III. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Positioning and movement Active involvement, adequate alertness, mental awareness and concentration (e.g. decisions on situations happening in his area of vicinity) Epected Parameter Mark 3: Style

8 FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) AAR1 MATCH DIFFICULTY 20 % 65 DECISIONS 60 % 80 STYLE 20 % 75 Final mark 76,0 Additional Assistant Referee 2 Comment He had to take the most important decision of the match, it was crucial for the final score. Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty (only aspects concerning the AAR2) AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 100,0 II. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game, Involvement Comment Apart from the important call in 45, he showed always his presence, and he seemed always ready to take other decisions, if nedded. Overview Important decisions in the penalty area (e.g. fouls like holding after set pieces, goaldecisions etc.) Quality of other decisions with regard to the application of the Laws of the Game Epected Important Decisions The ball (shot by Pepe ) bounced under the crossbar and then on the goal 45 line, but didn t cross it. This was the most important call of the match. Parameter Mark 2: Decisions AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 100,0 III. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Positioning and movement Active involvement, adequate alertness, mental awareness and concentration (e.g. decisions on situations happening in his area of vicinity) Epected Parameter Mark 3: Style AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 100,0

9 FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) AAR2 MATCH DIFFICULTY 20 % 100 DECISIONS 60 % 100 STYLE 20 % 100 Final mark 100,0 Fourth Official Comment He appeared busy when he had to check some shoes of Portuguese players, before the start of second half. Epected work for substitutions at the sidelines. Final mark FINAL MARK 75,0 Reserve Assistant Referee Comment Nothing to say, he wasn t involved. Final mark FINAL MARK 75,0