World of Football Refereeing Referee Observation Report

Transcription

1 World of Football Refereeing Referee Observation Report MATCH FACTS Group C, Matchday 1 10 June :45 CET Stadion Miejski Poznán GOALS 10 Mario Mandžukić (CRO, 3 ) 11 Sean St Ledger (IRL, 19 ) 12 Nikica Jelavić (CRO, 43) 13 Mario Mandžukić (CRO, 49) YELLOW CARDS Keith Andrews (IRL,45+1) Luka Modrić (CRO, 53 ) Niko Kranjčar (CRO, 84) SENDING OFFS NONE MATCH OFFICIALS IRELAND 1:3 CROATIA Function Full Name Origin Final Mark Referee Björn Kuipers NED 65,3 Assistant Referee 1 Sander van Roekel NED 80,0 Assistant Referee 2 Erwin E. J. Zeinstra NED 77,0 Additional Assistant Referee 1 Pol van Boekel NED 74,0 Additional Assistant Referee 2 Richard Liesveld NED 55,0 Fourth Official Viktor Shvetsov UKR 75,0 Reserve Assistant Referee Oleksandr Voytyuk UKR 75,0 UEFA Delegate Adonis Procopiou? CYP UEFA Referee Observer Yuriy Baskakov Blog Referee Observer(s) Filipe T Remarks concerning the final marks The final marks that have been awarded by the Blog Referee Observer(s) for every official are aimed at epressing a general assessment on the respective official s performance. They comply with certain and different evaluation scales that are eposed and eplained in the Referee Observation Checklist (a separate document). RUS POR

2 The Referee Background Second match for group C, first for both teams in theis EURO2012. The old fo Trapattoni was able to bring back the Irish team to the Cup. In the other side the Croatian team headed by Bilic. The match was crucial for both teams because their group partners are the holding champion and Italy, the favorites to go to net phase.. In the middle Bjorn Kuipers. First match for him in a EURO of seniors, but he has already some eperience with the 2009 EURO u21 final and several other UEFA matches. Good atmosphere, rainy night. For several times during the match a whistle was blown in the crowd. This was very disturbing for the players, for eample moments before the irish goal or in the end of the match. Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty and Importance II. CONTROL Comment Word of order: leniency. Kuipers tried to be lenient the best he could. In some moments this was good, but he missed several situations. About riots he had a good approach and proper communication. His body language was appropriate. Although some dubious and controversial situations he was always in control of the match and tried to be a communicative referee. Some flaws in the application of the laws of the game (see III. Decisions). Eemplary situations that strengthen the general impression 52 YC missed to Croatia no.7 Parameter Mark 2: Control AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 75 III. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game Comment (advice: always refer to aspects like card management, infringement detection, the application of the advantage rule, holding in the penalty area after set pieces, simulation and lay etra ordinary high emphasis on match influencing or even decisive decisions) He tried to be lenient, in the end he was fussy. Foul detection was variable during the match, sometimes good, others poor. Missed some fouls, pointed to some nonfouls, but the two major cases were Croatia second goal and the penalty for Ireland. This last was the biggest stain in Kuipers work. Important Decisions ((non)given cards should be mentioned, other important decisions in the opinion of the observer) 25 Foul favouring Ireland. No reason for award a foul in this situation. Croatia second goal. No offside in this situation. The ball comes the irish 43 defender to the Croatian attacker so no reason to raise the flag.

3 52 Missed YC to Croatia no7. In the net minute he awards a YC for the same reason and type of foul 53 Correct YC Ireland asks for a Penalty. No reason for penalty. Kuipers awards foul against Ireland. For my view that was a more intense dispute of the ball so no reason for foul. If Kuipers judges that as simulation the YC against the Irish was mandatory. Clear foul in the entrance of the penalty area. Kuipers and Liesveld (AAR2) have a clear and privileged view. So no reason to let the match continue. Error with importance in the outcome of the match. Technical mistake. Foul against Ireland. Kept the YC in his pocket, but that was more a moment of wrestling not football. YC card missed. 68 Nonfoul situation. However he wards a foul for Ireland. 84 Correct YC for Croatia no Harsh dispute of the ball by Croatia no19. No reason for foul, correct noncall. 87 Foul missed on the Croatia no.1 Parameter Mark 3: Decisions AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 55 IV. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Always close to the play, follows play at all times, and does not interfere with play Fleible Diagonal System Able to anticipate the action Enters the penalty area when necessary Appropiate, efficient and economic Positioning also at set pieces Physical Condition in general Adequate behaviour in dealing with injuries (awareness of serious injuries, possible advantages applied, cardtiming etc.) Comment Several times with poor position and blocking pass lines. Not fast enough moving in the pitch. Parameter Mark 4.1: Physical and Technical Aspects Tactical Approach The referee has a certain tactical approach, which is moving in the measures the Laws of the Game define, which is understood and consistent The referee s tactical approach is active, he is able to predict situations and to avoid conflicts by that

4 Personality and authority on the pitch Adequate communication Shows determination and courage in his decisions and has also tools to gain authority (adequate and clear gestures, using his whistle as kind of language) Shows respect Comment tet possible (mandatory in case of an awarded minus) Parameter Mark 4.2: Tactical Approach Summary of both sections (if necessary, give the minutes) Positive Points 1. Clear line, shows respect and demands respect 2. Good communication Points for improvement 1. Diagonal movement 2. Needs to react faster Comment on the cooperation within the referee team The Dutch team has some matches together for some time. Today some difficulties, especially with AAR2. Both AR s with a good performance and good assistance to the main ref. Parameter Mark 4: Style (factorized (50%) sum of both partial sections) AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 72,5 FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) REFEREE MATCH DIFFICULTY / IMPORTANCE 10 % 65 CONTROL 20 % 75 DECISIONS 40 % 55 STYLE 30 % 72,5 Final mark 65,25 Assistant Referee 1 Comment Good match. With good cooperation with the main ref in foul and throwin decisions.

5 Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty (only aspects concerning the AR1) II. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game Comment With good cooperation with the main ref in foul and throwin decisions. Overview (Non)Offside detection (evaluated independently (!) from the difficulty of the (non)offside situations) Quality of other decisions with regard to the application of the Laws of the Game Important Decisions (of course heavy attention to be paid on (non)offside decisions) 24 Correct offside 26 Correct offside Parameter Mark 2: Decisions AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 85 III. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Physical Condition Positioning and movement Adequate alertness, mental awareness and concentration (e.g. decisions on situations happening in his area of vicinity) Holds and moves his flag in accordance with the Laws of the Game Parameter Mark 3: Style FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) AR1 MATCH DIFFICULTY 20 % 65 DECISIONS 60 % 85 STYLE 20 % 80 Final mark 80 Assistant Referee 2

6 Comment With good cooperation with the main ref in foul and throwin decisions. Good when in minute 43 he decided to let the flag down. Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty (only aspects concerning the AR2) II. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game Comment tet possible! Overview (Non)Offside detection (evaluated independently (!) from the difficulty of the (non)offside situations) Quality of other decisions with regard to the application of the Laws of the Game Important Decisions (of course heavy attention to be paid on (non)offside decisions) 43 Good letting the flag down With some responsibility in the penalty not awarded to Ireland. However he 63 didn t had the better angle. Parameter Mark 2: Decisions III. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Physical Condition Positioning and movement Adequate alertness, mental awareness and concentration (e.g. decisions on situations happening in his area of vicinity) Holds and moves his flag in accordance with the Laws of the Game Parameter Mark 3: Style FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) AR2 MATCH DIFFICULTY 20 % 65 DECISIONS 60 % 80 STYLE 20 % 80 Final mark 77

7 Additional Assistant Referee 1 Comment tet possible, referring to the challenges the AAR1 had to cope with Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty (only aspects concerning the AAR1) II. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game, Involvement Comment tet possible! Overview Important decisions in the penalty area (e.g. fouls like holding after set pieces, goaldecisions etc.) Quality of other decisions with regard to the application of the Laws of the Game Important Decisions Parameter Mark 2: Decisions AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 75 III. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Positioning and movement Active involvement, adequate alertness, mental awareness and concentration (e.g. decisions on situations happening in his area of vicinity) Parameter Mark 3: Style FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) AAR1 MATCH DIFFICULTY 20 % 65 DECISIONS 60 % 75 STYLE 20 % 80 Final mark 74

8 Additional Assistant Referee 2 Comment With some situation to judge he failed in most of them. Parameter Mark 1: Degree of Difficulty (only aspects concerning the AAR2) II. DECISIONS Application of the Laws of the Game, Involvement Comment tet possible! Overview Important decisions in the penalty area (e.g. fouls like holding after set pieces, goaldecisions etc.) Quality of other decisions with regard to the application of the Laws of the Game Important Decisions 63 Missed a clear penalty when he has a clear view. 87 Missed clear foul on the Croatian GK Parameter Mark 2: Decisions AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 50 III. STYLE Physical and Technical Aspects Positioning and movement Active involvement, adequate alertness, mental awareness and concentration (e.g. decisions on situations happening in his area of vicinity) Parameter Mark 3: Style AWARDED MARK FOR THIS PARAMETER 60 FACTORIZED SUM (FINAL MARK) AAR2 MATCH DIFFICULTY 20 % 65 DECISIONS 60 % 50 STYLE 20 % 60 Final mark 55 Fourth Official

9 Comment Developed a proper work. Final mark FINAL MARK 75 Reserve Assistant Referee Comment No influence in the match. Final mark FINAL MARK 75