Project Niagara. within the Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake
|
|
- Hannah Nash
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Traffic Traffic Impact Impact Study Study Project Niagara within the Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Prepared for: Project Niagara July 2009
2 Traffic Impact Study PROJECT NIAGARA Niagara-On-The-Lake, Ontario Prepared for: Project Niagara July 2009
3 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION Proposed Development Proposed Study Area EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Roadways Existing Traffic Volumes Existing Traffic Analysis TRAFFIC FORECAST Background Traffic Volumes Background 2012 Traffic Analysis SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Trip Generation Trip Distribution and Assignment FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC Site Access Total 2012 Traffic Analysis Total 2017 Traffic Analysis Traffic Infiltration Other Site Considerations CONCLUSIONS...39 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Existing PM and Saturday Synchro Analysis Output Sheets Appendix Future Background PM and Saturday Synchro Analysis Output Sheets Appendix Future Total PM and Saturday Synchro Analysis Output Sheets Appendix Future Total PM and Saturday Synchro Analysis Output Sheets TN1370TNA00 i
4 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Project Niagara Concept Plan Exhibit Study Area Exhibit 2.2 PM Peak Hour- Existing Traffic Exhibit 2.3 Saturday Peak Hour- Existing Traffic Exhibit Future Background PM Traffic Volumes Exhibit Future Background Saturday Traffic Volumes Exhibit Future Background PM Traffic Volumes Exhibit Future Background Saturday Traffic Volumes Exhibit 4.1 Site Generated Trips PM Peak Hour Exhibit 4.2 Site Generated Trips Saturday Peak Hour Exhibit Future Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour Exhibit Future Total Traffic Volumes Saturday Peak Hour Exhibit Future Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour Exhibit Future Total Traffic Volumes Saturday Peak Hour LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Level of Service Definitions Table 2.2 Unsignalized Operational Performance 2009 Existing Traffic Conditions Table 2.3 Signalized Operational Performance 2009 Existing Traffic Conditions Table 3.1 Unsignalized Operational Performance 2012 Background Traffic Conditions Table 3.2 Signalized Operational Performance 2012 Background Traffic Conditions Table 5.1 Unsignalized Operational Performance 2012 Total Traffic Conditions Table 5.2 Signalized Operational Performance 2012 Total Traffic Conditions Table 5.3 Unsignalized Operational Performance 2017 Total Traffic Conditions Table 5.4 Signalized Operational Performance 2017 Total Traffic Conditions TN1370TNA00 ii
5 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 1.0 INTRODUCTION Delcan Corporation was retained by Project Niagara to undertake a traffic impact study for the proposed music festival development to be located on the Parks Canada Lands along Lakeshore Road within the Town of Niagara-On-The-Lake (NOTL). Project Niagara is a joint initiative by the Toronto Symphony Orchestra and Ottawa's National Arts Centre Orchestra to create an international music festival based in Niagara. These groups are working on completing a feasibility study and are currently liaising with the Region of Niagara and the Town of NOTL. The project team met with Regional and Town engineering and planning staff prior to commencing this study in order to develop a terms of reference for the traffic study. This terms of reference defined the parameters and extent of the review to be undertaken, such as study area limits, horizon years, time periods of analysis, data availability and traffic forecast assumptions. In general, the objectives of the traffic impact study included: Estimate traffic volumes to be generated by Project Niagara. Identify mode splits and primary access routes to the Music Festival. Forecast future traffic volumes for horizon years within the study area. Review the potential for traffic infiltration into adjacent neighbourhoods. Analyze intersection and roadway operations within the study area for each horizon year. Recommend appropriate improvements to the adjacent roadways surrounding the site to mitigate any negative development impacts. 1.1 Proposed Development Project Niagara will be a music festival featuring two of North America s finest orchestras along with other orchestras as well as with music from many other genres. Project Niagara has found synergies with regional arts, culture and heritage offerings as well as local wineries and other important drivers of Niagara s economic development and tourism community. TN1370TNA00 1
6 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study It is our understanding that the surrounding Parks Canada Lands will also be developed as public open space with some interpretative sites and park land. The facility is proposed to operate from June to September with approximately 50 events. The site will include an amphitheatre with 2000 seats under cover and vineyard style seating on a terraced lawn along with onsite parking facilities for patrons and shuttle bus service from other satellite locations. Employee parking will be accommodated at offsite locations with the use of shuttle buses. The concept plan is presented in Exhibit 1.1. Exhibit Project Niagara Concept Plan TN1370TNA00 2
7 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 1.2 Proposed Study Area The proposed 70-acre site is situated on the Parks Canada Lands on Lakeshore Road west of the Old Town in NOTL. The project study area encompasses the immediate road system in the vicinity of the development and a number of key intersections on the primary arterial and collector roadways that may be considered for access. The project study area is illustrated in Exhibit 1.2. Exhibit Study Area Legend Study Area TN1370TNA00 3
8 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Twelve intersections within the study area have been analyzed including two proposed site accesses. These intersections include: Regional Road 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line Regional Road 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Accesses Regional Road 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road Regional Road 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road Regional Road 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive Regional Road 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road Regional Road 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive Regional Road 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line Regional Road 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road Regional Road 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 Regional Road 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road Additionally, the Region of Niagara was undertaking a Class Environmental Assessment Study for Lakeshore Road from Four Mile Creek Road to East West Line. The purpose of the study was to introduce improvements to the complete the Greater Niagara Circle route and existing roadway geometry as required. This study has been put on hold pending the outcome of the Project Niagara Feasibility review. TN1370TNA00 4
9 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Existing Roadways The primary roadways servicing the study area include: Lakeshore Road (Regional Road 87) which is a two lane roadway extending from East West line to Mississauga Street. Four Mile Creek Road (Regional Road 100) which is a two lane roadway extending from the City of Niagara Falls municipal boundary to Niagara Stone Road (Regional Road 55). Four Mile Creek Road (NOTL roadway) which is a two lane roadway extending from Niagara Stone Road (Regional Road 55) to Lakeshore Road (Regional Road 87). East West Line (NOTL roadway) which is a two lane roadway extending from Lakeshore road (Regional Road 87) to Niagara Parkway. Niagara Stone Road (Regional Road 55) which is a two lane roadway extending from York Road (Regional Road 81) to Mary Street. Mary Street (NOTL roadway) which is a two lane roadway extending from King Street to Mississauga Street. Mississauga Street (NOTL roadway) which is a two lane roadway extending from Queen Street to Mary Street. Additionally, several roadways service the community s connectivity to the provincial highway system and to adjacent municipalities. To the west, Carlton Street (Regional Road 83) and Lakeshore Road (Regional Road 87) provide connectivity to the City of St. Catharines via bridges spanning the Welland Ship Canal. To the south, the Niagara Parkway, Taylor Road (Regional Road 70) and Four Mile Creek Road (Regional Road 100) connect the community to the City of Niagara Falls. Niagara Stone Road (Regional Road 55) provides access to the Queen Elizabeth Way (QEW) and Highway 405 (via QEW). The Highway 405 and QEW corridors also provide the connectivity to the International Bridge Crossings. Other area roadways such as Niven Road and Garrison Road are recognized as servicing a local function to adjacent properties, as such, these roadways are not proposed to service Project Niagara traffic. TN1370TNA00 5
10 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Delcan obtained traffic count information from the Region of Niagara which was collected between 2003 and 2008 during both peak and off peak seasons. The count information included both 8 hour turning movement counts and 24 hour link volume counts. Additionally, the study utilized counts undertaken by Delcan over the past two years within the Town. For the purpose of assessing the traffic impact of the development on the area roadway network, the critical time periods must be identified. These periods occur when the existing roadway volumes and the proposed site trip generation would be at their highest combined levels. In this particular case, two periods have been identified. The first occurs during a weekday evening and the other during Saturday midday. During other time periods, the estimated site traffic and volume of traffic on the area roads are considered to be lower. This approach to the evaluation of the development proposal allows the traffic analysis to consider the operations for more severe conditions than may be expected to occur during other time periods. Utilizing the available traffic data, base year (2009) weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hour traffic volume estimates on the roadway system were prepared for summer conditions. The evening estimates were derived by balancing the available weekday traffic volume count information and adjusting for evening peak hour conditions. The Saturday traffic volumes were estimated based on the relationship between weekday and weekend traffic volumes during the peak season. This relationship was derived through 24 hour traffic counts collected on area roadways. The existing 2009 base year traffic volumes are presented in Exhibit 2.2 and Exhibit 2.3 for the existing weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. TN1370TNA00 6
11 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING 2009 TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 2.2
12 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. SATURDAY PEAK HOUR EXISTING 2009 TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 2.3
13 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 2.3 Existing Traffic Analysis A Synchro (macroscopic) analysis of traffic conditions for existing and future traffic scenarios was undertaken to determine if there are any problematic intersections based on Level of Service (LOS), volume to capacity ratio (v/c) and delay time. The measure of LOS provides insight into how well the intersection is operating and is expressed as a letter between A and F, based on delay. The LOS thresholds are present in Table 2.1: Table Level of Service Definitions Level of Service (LOS) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay (Seconds) Signalized Intersection Average Delay (Seconds) A 0 to 10 0 to 10 B >10 to 15 >10 to 20 C > 15 to 25 > 20 to 35 D >25 to 35 >35 to 55 E >35 to 50 >55 to 80 F >50 >80 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2000 SimTraffic (microscopic) analysis was also undertaken in specific locations to assist in assessing potential traffic problem areas requiring correction and to further analyze complex intersections for queuing and operations. A series of input parameters are required to undertake traffic analysis. These parameters for this study were selected based on industry and Niagara Region s accepted practices and are presented below: A peak hour factor of 0.95 was to be utilized in all runs. A base saturation flow rate of 1900 for all movements. Signal timings were optimized for all analysis years. The operations of the adjacent intersections and the proposed principal accesses were examined using Synchro/Simtraffic. The analysis examined the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hour conditions for the following scenarios: 2009 Existing Traffic Background Traffic Total Traffic Total Traffic. TN1370TNA00 9
14 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study The results from the traffic analysis for both signalized and unsignalized intersections are presented below. For the purpose of signalized and unsignalized intersections the critical movement V/C threshold is defined as This is the point at which the traffic movement has reached 90% of its capacity and consideration should be given to planning for improvements in the future Unsignalized Intersections The Synchro capacity analysis completed for unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under existing traffic conditions are summarized in Table 2.2. The Synchro output sheets for the existing traffic analysis are provided in Appendix 1. Table 2.2 Unsignalized Operational Performance 2009 Existing Traffic Conditions PM PEAK HOUR Unsignalized Intersections LOS if E or F Delay (s) V/C East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession SATURDAY PEAK HOUR East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road SBL=E RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 NBL=F SBL=E The Synchro capacity analyses completed for all unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under existing traffic conditions indicates that all intersections are operating satisfactorily with some movements during the Saturday peak hour experiencing higher levels of delay. TN1370TNA00 10
15 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Specifically, the intersection of Concession 6 with Niagara Stone Road is experiencing notable delays for the northbound and southbound left turn movements. Although the delay is high for these movements, the v/c ratio indicates that there is still sufficient reserve capacity given the current physical geometry. The requirement for improvements to this intersection was identified in the NOTL Transportation Master Plan and the Region of Niagara has already identified this intersection in their capital forecasts for traffic operations and traffic control improvements. The situation should be monitored by the Region of Niagara as part of their annual intersection operation reviews to determine when traffic control modifications are required (e.g. traffic signals, roundabout). The southbound left turn movement at the intersection of Niven Road and Niagara Stone Road currently experiences a notable level of delay during the Saturday midday peak hour. The delay to the southbound left turn movement (which represents a low volume of traffic) at Niven Road is impacted by the availability of appropriate gaps in the Niagara Stone Road traffic stream. The delay values as presented in Table 2.2 is overstated as it has been calculated using the Synchro capacity software which does not account for gaps created by upstream traffic signals. For example, as the Garrison Village Drive traffic signal cycles to red, additional breaks in the traffic stream along Niagara Stone Road are created for Niven Road and other adjacent unsignalized intersections and/or private driveways. During the peak hours this is a common situation that occurs along arterial roadways Signalized Intersections Capacity analysis of the four signalized intersections was conducted under existing traffic conditions and the findings are presented in Table 2.3. The Synchro output sheets for the existing traffic analysis are provided in Appendix 1. TN1370TNA00 11
16 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Table 2.3 Signalized Operational Performance 2009 Existing Traffic Conditions Signalized Intersection RR 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road LOS Delay/ Veh (sec.) PM PEAK HOUR V/C Critical V/C (>=0.90) B A A A SATURDAY PEAK HOUR B A A B As presented in Table 2.3, all signalized intersections within the study area are operating satisfactorily under existing traffic conditions with a LOS of B or better and there are no critical movements. TN1370TNA00 12
17 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 3.0 TRAFFIC FORECAST 3.1 Background Traffic Volumes The projected growth in background traffic will take place independently of the current development proposal. Through discussions with Regional staff and to be consistent with the Town of NOTL Transportation Master Plan, it was determined that a 1% per annum area wide growth factor would sufficiently account for new area traffic resulting from other sources. For the purpose of this study, both 2012 and 2017 background forecasts were prepared. Since Project Niagara is anticipated to be completed by 2012, the 2017 traffic analysis was undertaken only for the 2017 total traffic condition (which includes 2017 background and proposed site generated traffic from Project Niagara). Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2: 2012 background traffic for the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. Exhibits 3.3 and 3.4: 2017 background traffic for the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. 3.2 Background 2012 Traffic Analysis Synchro capacity analysis completed for signalized and unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under future 2012 background traffic conditions and is discussed below Unsignalized Intersections The Synchro capacity analysis completed for unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under future 2012 background traffic conditions is summarized in Table 3.1. The Synchro output sheets for the 2012 background traffic analysis are provided in Appendix 2. TN1370TNA00 13
18 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. PM PEAK HOUR FUTURE 2012 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 3.1
19 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. SATURDAY PEAK HOUR FUTURE 2012 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 3.2
20 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. PM PEAK HOUR FUTURE 2017 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 3.3
21 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. SATURDAY PEAK HOUR FUTURE 2017 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 3.4
22 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Table 3.1 Unsignalized Operational Performance 2012 Background Traffic Conditions PM PEAK HOUR Unsignalized Intersections LOS if E or F Delay (s) V/C East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession SATURDAY PEAK HOUR East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road SBL=E RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 NBL=F SBL =E The Synchro capacity analysis completed for all unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under 2012 background traffic conditions indicates that all intersections would be operating satisfactorily. As in the 2009 scenario, the intersections of Niven Road and Niagara Stone Road and Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 are forecast to continue to experience notable levels of delay to side street left turning traffic during the Saturday midday peak hour. The Concession 6 and Niagara Stone Road intersection carries higher volumes of traffic and continued monitoring for the need for traffic control improvements should be undertaken by the Region of Niagara Signalized Intersections Capacity analysis of the four signalized intersections under 2012 background traffic conditions was conducted and the findings are presented in Table 3.2. The Synchro output sheets for the future 2012 background traffic analysis are provided in Appendix 2 for the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. TN1370TNA00 18
23 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Table 3.2 Signalized Operational Performance 2012 Background Traffic Conditions Signalized Intersection RR 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road LOS Delay/ Veh (sec.) PM PEAK HOUR V/C Critical V/C (>=0.90) B A A A SATURDAY PEAK HOUR B B A B As presented in Table 3.2, all signalized intersections within the study area would be operating satisfactorily under 2012 background traffic conditions with a LOS of B or better. TN1370TNA00 19
24 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 4.0 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC Site generated traffic for the proposed Project Niagara site was developed from a first principles approach based on the amount of onsite and satellite parking to be provided. The current site concept plan proposes a total of 2000 on-site parking spaces with the balance of the parking to be provided in off-site locations which could include: Newly developed parking areas outside of the study. Under utilized existing parking within the June to September operating season (e.g. Niagara College, School board properties, etc.). Partnerships with business within the community of NOTL (e.g. wineries, hotels, etc.). Partnerships with business in adjacent communities (e.g. casino, hotels, etc.). Patrons would be shuttled from these off site parking locations to the Project Niagara venue utilizing existing shuttles or newly initiated shuttle services. These services could be developed independently by Project Niagara or in cooperation with the Town and/or other community businesses in order to improve overall mobility throughout the Town and increase access to the core tourist areas during the peak summer season. These satellite parking areas can be used to coordinate and manage not only patron parking, but employees of the various participating businesses. These opportunities and formats should be further explored in the next phases of the Project Niagara development. Additional traffic to be generated by the site will include employee trips and delivery/service vehicle trips. The employee traffic will be controlled and directed to an off site location from which employees will be shuttled to the site. These trips will occur outside of the peak period of Project Niagara s operation. Delivery and service vehicle trips will also be schedule during off peak periods. With the introduction and enhancement of other travel modes/services to Niagara Region such as: District Airport, GO Bus, GO train, future marine connections and inter/intra municipal transit, the use of automobiles will be reduced. The resulting mode shift has not been considered in this document, thus the analysis presented in this report represents a conservative assessment of future roadway operations. TN1370TNA00 20
25 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 4.1 Trip Generation Based on information provided by Project Niagara, there are 50 seasonal events proposed for the venue. These events vary in anticipated attendance and current estimates assume that 75% of the events will have an attendance of 5000 or less and 90% of the events will have an attendance of 7000 or less. Given that a majority of the events (75%) will have an attendance not greater than 5000, it was considered appropriate to use this value for the purpose of traffic analysis. However, recognizing that there is a smaller portion of events that will exceed 5000 in attendance, a sensitivity analysis was completed using the 7000 attendance value, which accounts for about 90% of all events and the 9000 value which accounts for the balance. To determine the overall traffic that would be generated by Project Niagara, consideration must be given to the overall attendance and the proportion of vehicles that will be accommodated via on-site versus satellite parking locations. Assessing the onsite parking supply for this development was a function of the available roadway capacity within the immediate area. Although other area roadways and intersections will be assessed as part of the traffic analysis, Lakeshore Road, being the frontage road for the development, will be used by all site generated traffic and, as such, will govern how much additional site traffic can be accommodated. Working from the assumption that Lakeshore Road will not be widened for additional through lane capacity, the total carrying capacity is limited. As such, a sensitivity analysis was undertaken to determine the spare capacity along Lakeshore Road during the two peak analysis periods as a starting point for estimating traffic generation. A review of the future background traffic projects for the weekday and Saturday peak hours revealed that Saturday was the critical time period which should be used to establish surplus roadway capacity along Lakeshore Road and ultimately the on-site parking supply. The carrying capacity for a two lane rural roadway is estimated to be about 850 vehicles per hour per lane (1700 vph two-way). The future background forecast volumes adjacent to the site on Lakeshore Road for the Saturday analysis hour will be about 410 two way trips. Thus, 1390 additional trips could be accommodated on this section of Lakeshore Road. Allowing for peaking and reserving some spare TN1370TNA00 21
26 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study capacity, it was assumed that the maximum additional trips should not exceed 90% of the available roadway capacity. This value translates to about 1100 new site trips during the analysis peak hours. Based on experience at other outdoor summer music festivals of the type envisioned here (Ravinia, Tanglewood, Blossom etc.) the Festival grounds are anticipated to open three hours prior to the concert start time. The attending audience would use the pre-concert hours to picnic (picking up hampers on-site or bringing their own), sit on the lawn, visit, play ball, etc. Although experience with other festivals suggests that arrivals are staggered over the three hour period, we have taken a very conservative approach to measuring arrivals at the Project Niagara site. Specifically, for the purpose of our study we have assumed that 65% of all vehicles destined for on site parking will arrive in the hour preceding the event. Based on this information the resulting analysis would represent a worst case scenario in terms of site arrivals, and has been utilized to provide a conservative assessment of the roadway transportation impacts. Assuming that 1000 new auto site trips will be arriving during the analysis peak hour (hour preceding the event), which represents 65% of all site destined auto trips, the overall number of trips (on-site parking capacity) that can be accommodated is approximately Utilizing an average group size of 2.1 persons per auto, the 1500 vehicles translate to 3150 patrons. The balance of these patrons (1850) will be accommodated by either tour buses or shuttle buses. Not all patrons utilizing the tour buses or shuttle services will arrive in the hour preceding the event. This spread is influenced by both the individual s desires to travel to the venue, tour schedules and the timing and logistics of the shuttle bus operations. For the purpose of this analysis it has been assumed that 50% of the buses will arrive in each of the two preceding hours. It has been assumed that approximately 400 patrons will arrive in tour buses which translate to about 8 vehicles, 4 of which will arrive during the hour preceding the event. The remainder (1450) will be shuttled. The term shuttle bus is representative of a series of vehicle types which could include limousines, taxis, hotel vans and buses. Since this distribution is not known at this time, a conservative estimate of average vehicle occupancy was used (20 persons/vehicle) to account for the mix of vehicle types. The occupancy translates to 73 shuttle TN1370TNA00 22
27 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study vehicle trips, 37 of which will arrive during the hour preceding the event. In summary, during the peak hour of analysis (hour preceding the event) 1000 autos, 4 tour buses and 37 shuttle vehicle trips will arrive on site, for a total of 1041 vehicles. The preceding analysis was undertaken based on an attendance of 5000 persons which accommodates 75% of anticipated events during a season. As previously presented, an attendance of 7000 persons would account for 90% of all anticipated events. The net effect of the additional 2000 persons is documented below. All additional patrons would arrive at the site by either shuttle or tour bus as no additional on site parking has been assumed. Maintaining the same proportion for tour bus activity, 500 patrons would be accommodated by 10 tour buses. The remaining 1500 patrons would be accommodated by 75 additional shuttle vehicle trips. Therefore, during the hour preceding the event, an additional 43 (50%) vehicle trips are anticipated. Similarly, for the 9000 person attendance scenario, an additional 86 vehicle trips (over the 5000 scenario) would be anticipated in the hour preceding the event. 4.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment In developing the trip distribution for the site generated trips, information from Project Niagara was supplemented by Delcan s understanding of travel patterns within the NOTL and Niagara Region area. Based on the feasibility produced for Project Niagara, 20% of trips attracted by this venue are destination trips made because the event is present. The remaining 80% are captured trips from persons already visiting the Niagara Region and choosing to add this venue to their schedule. It is anticipated that a larger number of trips will be captured from NOTL and adjacent municipalities (i.e. Niagara Falls, Thorold, St. Catharines) than from the more remote municipalities. Based on this information it has be estimated that about 40% of all trips are captured from persons already visiting NOTL both in the old Town (25%) and elsewhere throughout the community (15%). This reflects the fact that the demographics of the expected Project Niagara patron are closely aligned with that of existing Town visitors. TN1370TNA00 23
28 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study The remaining 60% will approach the venue from either the west or the south utilizing the Welland Ship Canal crossings (10%), Niagara Stone Road (30%), Concession 6 Road (10%) and the Niagara Parkway (10%). This distribution is for private automobile traffic, all shuttle and tour buses are assumed to utilize Niagara Stone Road and Mary Street to access Lakeshore Road. The primary access routes for traffic destined to the Project Niagara site include: Lakeshore Road from Welland Ship Canal crossings (west); Mary Street via Niagara Stone Road/Mississauga Street; Four Mile Creek Road via East West Line; and Four Mile Creek Road via Niagara Stone Road. The resulting site generated traffic during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours are presented in Exhibit 4.1 and Exhibit 4.2, respectively. TN1370TNA00 24
29 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. PM PEAK HOUR SITE GENERATED TRIPS EXHIBIT 4.1
30 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. SATURDAY PEAK HOUR SITE GENERATED TRIPS EXHIBIT 4.2
31 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 5.0 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC By the year 2012 and 2017, projected Total Traffic is estimated as the combination of growth in background traffic, and the projected traffic volumes from the Project Niagara development. The resulting 2012 and 2017 total traffic volumes are presented in the following exhibits: Exhibit 5.1 and Exhibit 5.2: 2012 Total Traffic Volumes for the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. Exhibit 5.3 and Exhibit 5.4: 2017 Total Traffic Volumes for the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours, respectively. 5.1 Site Access Based on the roadway configuration and the preliminary site concept plan, a minimum of two access points should be provided to the site along Lakeshore Road. The access driveways should consist of two receiving lanes and one exit lane. This configuration would allow for lane reversal during the exiting of traffic at the end of an event. The location of these access points should be sufficiently separated from each other and adjacent roads to allow for proper traffic operations along Lakeshore Road. These assumptions have been utilized as part of the future total traffic analysis. 5.2 Total 2012 Traffic Analysis Synchro capacity analysis was completed for signalized and unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under future total 2012 traffic conditions for a 5000 attendance event. The analysis results are discussed below. TN1370TNA00 27
32 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. PM PEAK HOUR 2012 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 5.1
33 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. SATURDAY PEAK HOUR 2012 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 5.2
34 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. PM PEAK HOUR 2017 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 5.3
35 SITE Niagara Stone Road Lakeshore Road East West Line Four Mile Creek Road Niven Road Garrison Village Drive Concession East West Line Niagara Stone Road N.T.S. SATURDAY PEAK HOUR 2017 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 5.4
36 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Unsignalized Intersections The Synchro capacity analysis completed for unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under 2012 future total traffic conditions is summarized in Table 5.1. The Synchro output sheets for the 2012 total traffic analysis are provided in Appendix 3. Table 5.1 Unsignalized Operational Performance 2012 Total Traffic Conditions Unsignalized Intersections PM PEAK HOUR LOS if E or F Delay (s) V/C East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Access 1 RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Access 2 RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road SATURDAY PEAK HOUR East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Access RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Access RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road - - RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road SBL=F RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 NBL=F NBT=E SBL =F ST =D The Synchro capacity analysis completed for all unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under 2012 total traffic conditions indicates that all intersections would be operating satisfactorily except for the Concession 6 and Niagara Stone Road intersection. This intersection has a number of movements operating at both a high level of delay and v/c ratios approaching capacity. It is recommended that traffic control improvements be implemented prior to The Region of Niagara TN1370TNA00 32
37 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study is currently monitoring the intersection and is proposing to have traffic control improvements implemented as required. The gap seeking delay at the Niven Road intersection still exists, but as presented earlier, additional gaps in traffic will occur as a result of cycling of the Garrison Village Drive traffic signal, thereby providing more opportunities for side street traffic to complete left turn maneuvers Signalized Intersections Capacity analysis of the signalized intersections under 2012 total traffic conditions was conducted and the findings are presented in Table 5.2. The table also summarizes the operation of the intersection of Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 as a signalized intersection. The Synchro output sheets for the future 2012 total traffic analysis are provided in Appendix 3 for the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. Table 5.2 Signalized Operational Performance 2012 Total Traffic Conditions Signalized Intersection RR 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road LOS Delay/ Veh (sec.) PM PEAK HOUR V/C Critical V/C (>=0.90) B B A A B SATURDAY PEAK HOUR B B A A C NBT=0.94 As presented in Table 5.2, all intersections are forecast to operate at a LOS of C or better during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours of analysis. One movement, the northbound through on Niagara Stone Road at Four Mile Creek Road intersection is TN1370TNA00 33
38 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study identified as exceeding the 0.9 v/c threshold. This only occurs during the Saturday peak hour, at which time the movement reaches a v/c ratio of Although the v/c is identified as critical there is still surplus capacity in this movement and the intersection. The overall intersection is forecast to operate at a LOS C. 5.3 Total 2017 Traffic Analysis Synchro capacity analysis was completed for signalized and unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under future total 2017 traffic conditions for a 5000 attendance event. The result of the traffic analysis is discussed below Unsignalized Intersections The Synchro capacity analysis completed for unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under 2017 future total traffic conditions is summarized in Table 5.3. The Synchro output sheets for the 2017 total traffic analysis are provided in Appendix 4. The Synchro capacity analysis completed for all unsignalized intersections during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours under 2017 total traffic conditions indicates that the majority of intersections would be operating satisfactorily with no critical movements. The only exception continues to be the existing left turn from Niven Road to Niagara Stone Road, which services a very low volume. TN1370TNA00 34
39 Table 5.3 Unsignalized Operational Performance 2017 Total Traffic Conditions Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Unsignalized Intersections LOS if E or F PM PEAK HOUR Delay (s) V/C East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Access RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Access RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road SATURDAY PEAK HOUR East West Line and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and East West Line RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Access RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Project Niagara Access RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Niven Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Niven Road SBL=F Signalized Intersections Capacity analysis of the three signalized intersections under 2017 total traffic conditions was conducted and the findings are presented in Table 5.4. The Synchro output sheets for the future 2017 total traffic analysis are provided in Appendix 4 for the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours. TN1370TNA00 35
40 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Table 5.4 Signalized Operational Performance 2017 Total Traffic Conditions Signalized Intersection RR 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road RR 87 Lakeshore Road/Mary Street and Niagara Stone Road RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and East West Line RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Garrison Village Drive RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 RR 55 Niagara Stone Road and Four Mile Creek Road LOS Delay/ Veh (sec.) PM PEAK HOUR V/C Critical V/C (>=0.90) B B A A B SATURDAY PEAK HOUR B B A A C WBTR=0.95 NBT=0.96 As presented in Table 5.4, all signalized intersections within the study area would operate satisfactorily under 2017 total traffic conditions with a LOS of C or better. There are two critical movements identified at the intersection of Niagara Stone Road at Four Mile Creek Road. Both movements still have surplus capacity, as does the intersection. Overall the intersection will continue to operate at a good level of service with moderate delay. A sensitivity analysis was completed for both a 7000 and 9000 person attendance event for the same area intersections under 2017 total traffic conditions. The only change in this analysis was the introduction of 43 or 86 more tour/shuttle bus trips to the roadway system, respectively. The addition of these additional vehicle trips did not highlight any new operational issues at any of the study area intersections. TN1370TNA00 36
41 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 5.4 Traffic Infiltration Given the location of both Niven Road and Garrison Village Drive there is a potential that some traffic wishing to bypass the arterial roads may consider using these roadways as a route to access or egress the Lakeshore Road area. The traffic analysis completed for the surrounding area intersections under 2017 future total traffic conditions indicated that there will be sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed Project Niagara development, thereby the catalyst for such shortcutting behaviour should not be present. However, recognizing that drivers may still perceive these routes as more desirable, it is recommended that a monitoring program be commenced 6 months prior to the opening of the venue to establish base conditions and that the monitoring continues through the first season of operation. The monitoring could capture information such as volume, speed, amount of through traffic (non local) and increased on- street parking. Based on the findings, appropriate counter measures can be developed to address the specific issues. The countermeasures could include traffic calming techniques such as speed humps, curb extensions or more passive approaches such as increased policing or bylaw enforcement of possible parking restrictions. 5.5 Other Site Considerations In the next phase of the project, as the site plan is further refined, consultation with emergency services regarding their needs for access will be undertaken. These discussions will address not only Project Niagara but the surrounding area as well. Reflecting on the completed traffic analysis, the intersections in the immediate surrounding area of the venue will continue to operate at good levels of service with moderate delay and should not be a detriment to the ability of emergency services to respond within the immediate study area. Still to be developed are the traffic management strategies that involve the satellite parking lots and the exiting of traffic from the venue at the end of an event. These items will be developed in subsequent studies as part of the next phase of the project. TN1370TNA00 37
42 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study Some cursory consideration has been given to the following two items: Satellite Parking The shuttle service could explore integration with the Town s existing transit system to increase the mobility of visitors without their vehicles. Partnerships with other businesses (i.e. wineries, hotels, etc.) already providing patron shuttle services. Identify existing underutilized paved areas during the summer season such as Niagara College and Niagara District High School. Develop new areas only as a last resort. Traffic Management Make use of paid duty officers to control traffic. Temporarily barricade adjacent residential streets during the egress of event vehicles. Split exiting traffic by allowing traffic at each of the two accesses to only go opposite ways: east to Niagara Stone Road and west to East West Line. Provide way finding signage from the various municipal gateways to the venue. Consider allowing customers to purchase their parking vouchers online to better direct them to the appropriate location when they arrive. Provide information to patrons at their home through marketing campaigns and website information related to access routes, parking locations and partnerships. Explore linkages between modes: Shuttle lots within cycling and path linkages/amenities Shuttle lots with connections to other transit systems operating in NOTL like St. Catharines and Niagara Falls Transit at Niagara College. Use of existing and new modes/services of transportation, such as the District Airport, GO Bus, GO Train, marine connections and inter/intra municipal transit. TN1370TNA00 38
43 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study 6.0 CONCLUSIONS The traffic impact of the proposed Project Niagara development was analyzed for the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hour conditions. The following conclusions were derived from the completed roadway and intersection operational analysis, which included the review of existing, future background 2012 and future total (2012 and 2017) travel demand scenarios: Project Niagara s feasibility study anticipates 50 events each season with varying attendance. It is estimated that 75% of all events will have an attendance of 5000 person or less and 90% of all events will have an attendance of 7000 or less and the balance is in the range of The existing roadway network can accommodate the vehicular traffic demand during the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak hours generated by these various attendance scenarios. The existing and 2012 background traffic scenarios result in satisfactory traffic operation of study area intersections with no required geometric improvements or traffic control improvements. The primary access routes for the Project Niagara site include: o Lakeshore Road from Welland Ship Canal crossings (west); o Mary Street via Niagara Stone Road/Mississauga Street; o East West Line via Four Mile Creek Road; and o Four Mile Creek Road via Niagara Stone Road. We recommend that the number of on site parking spaces should be modified to 1500 based on the available capacity of adjacent roadways to accommodate forecast travel demands. The site will generate a total of 1000 autos and 41 tour/shuttle buses for a 5000 person event during the peak hour. For all other events the additional attendance will be accommodated by tour and shuttle buses. For each additional 1000 persons in attendance, it is estimate that an additional 22 tour/shuttle buses will be required in the peak hour. While there may be some minor traffic spillover into nearby neighbourhoods, this can be properly managed through appropriate monitoring and discouragements in order to eliminate or minimize any negative effect. TN1370TNA00 39
44 Project Niagara Traffic Impact Study The intersection of Niagara Stone Road and Concession 6 will require traffic control improvements by These improvements are currently included within the Region of Niagara s capital forecasts for traffic operations and traffic control improvements. A future traffic management plan is required and should be prepared in consultation with emergency services, The Town of NOTL and the Region of Niagara as part of the next phase of the project. A future traffic study to position satellite or Park and Ride parking facilities needs to be undertaken. Park and Ride lots and shuttle services are an opportunity to explore community partnerships (with Niagara area businesses), to minimize the need for newly paved areas and to enhance the overall mobility of visitors to the Niagara Region in general and Niagara-On-The Lake in particular. Linkages between these parking locations, transit, cycling and trails should be encouraged. TN1370TNA00 40
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9
MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9 December 18, 2012 112-566 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates
More informationDUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING
DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING Final Report August 3, 216 #31, 316 5th Avenue NE Calgary, AB T2A 6K4 Phone: 43.273.91 Fax: 43.273.344 wattconsultinggroup.com Dunbow Road Functional Planning Final Report
More informationVIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DECEMBER 2012 READ, VOORHEES & ASSOCIATES TORONTO, ONTARIO Read, Voorhees & Associates
More information5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study
5858 N COLLEGE, LLC nue Traffic Impact Study August 22, 2016 Contents Traffic Impact Study Page Preparer Qualifications... 1 Introduction... 2 Existing Roadway Conditions... 5 Existing Traffic Conditions...
More informationTraffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016
Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 216 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE WestBranch Residential Development LOCATED IN DAVIDSON, NC Prepared For: Lennar Carolinas, LLC
More informationList of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...
List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections... Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls... Existing
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY The Caledon Transportation Needs Study has been undertaken as a joint project by the Town of Caledon and the Region of Peel to determine the existing
More informationAPPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS
APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS MEMO : Peter Steacy, P.Eng. Date: December 3, 2014 : Ian Borsuk, P.Eng. Job No.: 3414015-000 Subject: City of Ottawa O-Train Extension Planning & EA Study
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017
TMS Engineers, Inc. Traffic Impact Study Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio June 5, 2017 Prepared for: Westlake City Schools - Board of Education 27200 Hilliard Boulevard Westlake, OH 44145 TRAFFIC
More information2136 And 2148 Trafalgar Road Townhouse Development Traffic Brief. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited
2136 And 2148 Trafalgar Road Townhouse Development Traffic Brief Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited March 217 March 217 Project: 1627 Diana Vlasic, M.C.I.P., R.P.P Metropolitan Consulting 445 Paletta
More informationCorporation of the Town of Oakville. December 16, 2013
Corporation of the Town of Oakville Transportation Impact Analysis and Parking Study for Proposed Secondary School, Oakville Draft Final Report Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION Transportation Consultants, LLC 1101 17 TH AVENUE SOUTH NASHVILLE, TN 37212
More informationMETHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)
Chapter 5 Traffic Analysis 5.1 SUMMARY US /West 6 th Street assumes a unique role in the Lawrence Douglas County transportation system. This principal arterial street currently conveys commuter traffic
More informationENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report
Preparedby: ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS Final Report Prepared for Maricopa County Department of Transportation Prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1
More informationREDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Wendy s Parker, Colorado January 215 Prepared for: Sterling Design Associates, LLC 29 W. Littleton Boulevard #3 Littleton, Colorado 812 Prepared by: 1233 Airport
More informationTHIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
GA SR 25 Spur at Canal Road Transportation Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA 1725 Reynolds Street, Suite 300 Brunswick, Georgia 31520 PREPARED BY 217 Arrowhead Boulevard Suite 26 Jonesboro,
More informationMagnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Magnolia Place Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Updated January 4, 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Existing Conditions...6
More information3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands
3.2.2 Proposed Road Network within Phase 1B Lands Figure 3.1 also shows the proposed road network within the Premier Gateway Phase 1B Employment Area lands, which features two collector roads providing
More informationSouth Albion-Bolton Community Plan North Hill Supermarket Transportation Study Part B: Evaluation of Alternatives
Community Plan North Hill Supermarket Transportation Study Part B: Evaluation of Alternatives Prepared for: The Town of Caledon August 9 Transportation Solutions Ltd. 43 Forest Road Cambridge, ON N1S 3B4
More informationAppendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document
Existing Conditions Report - Appendix Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document This document defines the methodology and assumptions that will be used in the traffic forecasting
More informationHILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 October
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT DEERFIELD TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY, OHIO Nantucket Circle and Montgomery Road () Prepared for: ODLE
More informationAPPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Appendix 2 City of Mississauga Lakeshore Road FINAL REPORT Transportation Review Study December 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Study Purpose
More informationAMEC Earth and Environmental. Bovaird Drive Environmental Assessment. Traffic Study Final Report. August Excellence in Transportation Planning
AMEC Earth and Environmental Bovaird Drive Environmental Assessment Traffic Study Final Report August Excellence in Transportation Planning AMEC Earth and Environmental Bovaird Drive Class EA Traffic
More informationQUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Quickie Convenience Stores Larny Holdings Ltd. c/o PBC Group April 15, 2015 115-615 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE CHAMPAIGN UNIT#4 SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL (SPALDING PARK SITE) IN THE CITY OF CHAMPAIGN Final Report Champaign Urbana Urbanized Area Transportation Study 6/24/2014
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC
Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1. Location and Study Area... 1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Access... 2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses... 2 1.4. Existing ways...
More information84-88 Columbia Street West Waterloo, Ontario Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited
84-88 Columbia Street West Waterloo, Ontario Transportation Impact Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited June 217 Project Summary Project Number 15255 June 217 Client Masri O Inc. Architects
More informationENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for Buncombe County Schools ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Asheville, NC Project Number: 13-71 8/1/13 www.davenportworld.com DAVENlORT Transportation Impact Analysis Enka
More informationSubject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis
MEMORANDUM Transportation Bill Troe, AICP Jason Carbee, AICP 12120 Shamrock Plaza Suite 300 Omaha, NE 68154 (402) 334-8181 (402) 334-1984 (Fax) To: Project File Date: Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade
More informationTraffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017
Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North arolina June 2017 N. Little Egypt Road DQ\ QDQFLQJ VDOHV RU RWKHU SHUIRUPDQFH EDVHG FULWHULD Proposed Site Driveways Site Driveway 1 TRAFFI
More informationNEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:
NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Solidex Holdings Limited & Investissement Maurice Lemieux Investments Attn: Mr. Anthony
More information9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.
9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. TIA GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Report Context Municipal Address Comment: Section 1.1 Location relative to major
More informationPreliminary Transportation Analysis
Preliminary Transportation Analysis Goals of a Robust, Multimodal Transportation Network Safe Accessible/Connected Efficient Comfortable Context-Sensitive Motor Vehicle: Continue to analyze the data to
More informationFAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Bona Building & Management Co. Ltd. Place Vanier, 333 North River Road Vanier, Ontario K1L 8B9 August 12,
More informationChapter 16: Traffic and Parking A. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 6: Traffic and Parking A. ITRODUCTIO This chapter examines the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Fresh Kills Park roads. The analysis of transit and pedestrians is presented
More informationProject Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015
Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Data Collection... 1 3 Existing Roadway Network... 2 4 Traffic Volume Development... 2 5 Warrant Analysis... 3 6 Traffic Control Alternative
More informationOTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:
OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: The Ottawa Train Yards Inc. 223 Colonnade Road South, Suite 212 Nepean, Ontario K2E 7K3 January 17, 2012
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Creekside Thornton, Colorado August 215 November 215 Revised: August 216 Prepared for: Jansen Strawn Consulting Engineers 45 West 2 nd Avenue Denver, Colorado 8223 Prepared by:
More information5.0 Roadway System Plan
Southwest Boise Transportation Study Page 16 5.0 Roadway System Plan The Roadway System Plan outlines roadway improvements in the Initial Study Area. It forecasts future deficiencies on the arterial system,
More informationMoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network
MoPac South: Impact on Cesar Chavez Street and the Downtown Network Prepared by: The University of Texas at Austin Center for Transportation Research Prepared for: Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority
More informationFieldgate. Traffic Impact Study Proposed Retail Commercial and Residential Development Thompson Road and Louis St. Laurent Avenue Town of Milton
Fieldgate Traffic Impact Study Proposed Retail Commercial and Residential Development Thompson Road and Louis St. Laurent Avenue Town of Milton September 214 September 23 214 Ms Debbie Pacchiarotti Our
More informationOperational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies
Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies Revision Submitted on: November, 0 Author: Adriana Rodriguez, E.I Assistant Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff 0 South Orange Avenue, Suite 00 Orlando,
More informationTRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado
TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado Submitted by: Fehr & Peers 621 17th Street, Ste. 231 Denver, CO 8293 (33) 296-43 December, 21 App. M-2 Traffic Assessment River Edge Colorado December 21 TABLE OF
More informationMEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:
MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: 2434984 Ontario Inc. 13-5510 Canotek Road Ottawa, Ontario K1J 9J5 June 4, 2015 115-613 Report_2.doc D. J.
More informationGlenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation
Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation PREPARED FOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN PREPARED BY: DECEMBER 2007 Glenn Avenue Corridor Study--Auburn, Alabama TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Background
More informationHighway 111 Corridor Study
Highway 111 Corridor Study June, 2009 LINCOLN CO. HWY 111 CORRIDOR STUDY Draft Study Tea, South Dakota Prepared for City of Tea Sioux Falls Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by HDR Engineering,
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC
Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3.
More informationWelcome. The Brooklin Secondary Plan and Transportation Master Plan are collectively referred to as the Brooklin Study.
Welcome The Town of Whitby is undertaking a study to prepare a Secondary Plan and Transportation Master Plan to guide and manage growth in the Brooklin area. The Brooklin Secondary Plan and Transportation
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis
Traffic Impact Analysis Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. Waterloo, Iowa SEH No. A-CLAAS0501.00 November 16, 2004 Table of Contents (Continued) Table of Contents Certification Page Table of Contents Page 1.0
More informationFigure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing
Page 2 of 9 Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing The Montebello Drive extension will run north south and connect Wilsonville Road to the Boones Ferry Road to Brown Road
More informationSouth Street Campus Lands Development. City of London TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT
South Street Campus Lands Development City of London TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT TW1387 South Street Campus Lands Development City of London TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT May 2013 South Street
More informationTRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department
TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department 9/1/2009 Introduction Traffic studies are used to help the city determine potential impacts to the operation of the surrounding roadway network. Two
More informationWalmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Walmart (Store #4865-00) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota Prepared for: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ã2013 Kimley-Horn
More informationKing Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado
Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY King Soopers #116, a grocery marketplace anchored commercial development, is proposed
More informationMEMORANDUM. Our project study area included the following locations:
MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Subject: Najib O. Habesch Nick M. Fomenko, PE, PTOE Bushnell Park North Traffic Assessment BETA Project #: 4461 As part of our contract to undertake the design of the Bushnell
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...
TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS... IX 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Project Overview... 1 1.2 Analysis Scenarios...
More informationNiagara Region Transportation Master Plan. Subarea Analysis Summary
Table of Contents 1. Subarea Analysis... 1 2. Subarea #1: QEW Glendale Avenue Highway 405... 1 3. Subarea #2: West St. Catharines... 3 4. Subarea #3: Port Robinson... 4 5. Subarea #4: Welland... 6 6. Subarea
More informationOFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.
OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 9402209 Canada Inc. December 15, 2015 115-625 Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation
More informationTechnical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.
Technical Memorandum TRFFIC IMPCT STUDY RIDLEY ROD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, V Prepared for: Mr. David Williams By: Charles Smith, P.E., PTOE EPR Charlottesville, V July 2014 1 TBLE OF CONTENTS
More informationNO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
3. 23 NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS This section addresses the operations of the transportation system and details how it would be expected to function under year 23 No Build conditions with the projected
More informationCapital Region Council of Governments
March 23, 2018 Capital Region Council of Governments PROJECT CONCEPT REPORT Realignment of Swamp and Northfield Road s approaches to Route 44 (Boston Turnpike) Town of Coventry SUMMARY: The Town of Coventry
More informationTRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio December 12, 2012 Prepared for: The City of Huron 417 Main Huron, OH 44839 Providing Practical Experience Technical Excellence and Client
More informationREPORT. Engineering and Construction Department
REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: JUNE 11, 2013 FROM: Engineering and Construction Department DATE: May 24, 2013 SUBJECT: Great Lakes Boulevard Mini Roundabout LOCATION: Great Lakes Boulevard
More information1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Prepared by: HNTB North Carolina, PC 343
More informationTransportation Impact Study Guidelines AS ADOPTED BY REGION OF WATERLOO COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 REPORT NO. P
Transportation Impact Study Guidelines AS ADOPTED BY REGION OF WATERLOO COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 REPORT NO. P-13-088 HOUSEKEEPING EDITS APPLIED UPDATED TO FILE VERSION 4, JULY 22, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationINDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED Prepared for: 7849648 Canada Inc. Octiober 1, 2015 114-598 Overview_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting
More informationSELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS
CHAPTERFOUR SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS 4.1 SELECTED ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS Introduction Capacity analysis was performed on six selected roadways within the Dearborn County study area using the
More informationHOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Momentum Planning & Communications 1165 Greenlawn Crescent Ottawa, ON K1L 6C2 June 29, 2015 115-618 Brief_1.doc
More informationURBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2
URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2 February 27, 2014 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
More informationGene Dillon Elementary School Traffic Study Division Street Site
To: From: Dr. James Hess, Superintendent Jordan Schwarze, PE, Senior Engineer Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Date: March 30, 2016 Subject: Gene Dillon Elementary School Traffic Study reet Site Memorandum
More informationTraffic Study North Shore School District 112
Traffic Study North Shore School District 112 Proposed Expansion of Northwood Junior High School Prepared By: May 1, 2015 1. Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) has been retained
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA
Chapter 6 - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.1. Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a standard format for preparing a traffic impact study in the City of Steamboat
More informationJoe Rocca P.Eng., Traffic and Asset Management Supervisor. Review for Proposed Kingsway Sports and Entertainment Complex, City of Greater Sudbury
LETTER REPORT TO: Joe Rocca P.Eng., Traffic and Asset Management Supervisor FROM: Brett Sears and Ubaid Ali, WSP SUBJECT: Review for Proposed Kingsway Sports and Entertainment Complex, City of Greater
More informationAPPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA
APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA Environmental and Planning Consultants 440 Park Avenue South 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel: 212 696-0670 fax: 212 213-3191 www.akrf.com Draft Memorandum To: Michael
More informationPlace Vanier 250 Montreal Road Transportation Impact Study Addendum. Prepared for Broccolini Construction September 20 th, 2012
Update for the May 31 st, 2012 Traffic Impact Study Prepared for Broccolini Construction 111-23596-00 September 20 th, 2012 2611 Queensview Drive, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario CANADA K2B 8K2 Telephone: 613-829-2800
More informationBistro 6. City of Barrie. Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report. Project Number: JDE 1748
City of Barrie Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1748 Date Submitted: June 12 th, 2017 06/12/17 John Northcote, P.Eng. Professional License
More informationTransportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace
Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace Abington Township, Montgomery County, PA Sandy A. Koza, P.E., PTOE PA PE License Number PE059911 Prepared by McMahon Associates, Inc. 425 Commerce Drive,
More informationQUEEN ELIZABETH WAY / MARTINDALE ROAD BRIDGE DEMOLITION DETOUR ANALYSIS
QUEEN ELIZABETH WAY / MARTINDALE ROAD BRIDGE DEMOLITION DETOUR ANALYSIS Fabio Saccon, P.Eng Area Traffic Manager Bernard James Engineer in Training Martin Sneep Senior Project Manager Lance Dutchak Traffic
More informationBLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: Ontario Limited.
BLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for: 2534189 Ontario Limited April 6, 2018 117-668 TIA Report_2.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates
More informationDesign Traffic Technical Memorandum
State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL October 2010 State Road 7 Extension PD&E Study Design Traffic Technical Memorandum Palm Beach County, FL Prepared
More informationSixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan
Memorandum Date: November 13, 2012 To: From: c.c. Subject: Rob Freeman (Freeman Planning) Kevin Phillips Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan 33016631 This memo was prepared to review the transit
More information2016 Church Street Access Study. 100 Clinton Square 126 North Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY
2016 Church Street Access Study 100 Clinton Square 126 North Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY 13202 www.smtcmpo.org Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council Final Report February 23, 2016 This
More informationBridge Street Corridor Study Report
Bridge Street Corridor Study Report Prepared for: Prepared by: BRIDGE STREET CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT PREPARED FOR: CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 EAST BRANCH STREET ARROYO GRANDE,
More informationLow Level Road Improvements Traffic Analysis. Report
Low Level Road Improvements Traffic Analysis Report June, 22 Table of Contents. INTRODUCTION.... LOW LEVEL ROAD PROJECT....2 STUDY AREA....2. West-End Corridor Improvements... 2.2.2 East-End Corridor Improvements...
More information3. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS
3. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS Eglinton Avenue spans 35 kilometres across the centre of Toronto, from Kingston Road near Lake Ontario in the east to the Pearson Airport in the west. The corridor
More informationTraffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning
F i s c h b a c h Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning Traffic Impact Study Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN Prepared March 2016 Ms. Gillian L. Fischbach, P.E.,
More informationHarrah s Station Square Casino
Transportation Analysis Harrah s Station Square Casino Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Submitted To: City of Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Prepared By: DKS Associates GAI Consultants December
More informationINDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Simluc Contractors Limited 2550 Blackwell Street, Ottawa K1B 5R1 October 18, 2013 113-584 Overview_1.doc D. J.
More informationLIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009
LIVERPOOL TRANSPORTATION MODELING TECHNICAL MEMO MAY 2009 Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council 100 Clinton Square 126 N. Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY 13202 Telephone (315) 422-5716; Fax
More informationTABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS
4.11 TRANSPORTATION The potential traffic impacts of the proposed project are evaluated in the Buena Park Beach/Orangethorpe Mixed Use Project Traffic Analysis (Traffic Analysis) by Austin-Foust Associates
More informationChapter 4 Traffic Analysis
Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis PURPOSE The traffic analysis component of the K-68 Corridor Management Plan incorporates information on the existing transportation network, such as traffic volumes and intersection
More informationFINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study
FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study Prepared for City of Albertville, MN July 20, 2017 SRF No. 10060.00 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Existing Conditions... 1 Data Collection...
More informationHenderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development
Zoning Case: Z145-3 Traffic Impact Analysis Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development Dallas, TX October 26 th, 216 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #644827 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic
More informationThe proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.
Stantec Consulting Ltd. 1331 Clyde Avenue, Suite 4 Ottawa ON K2C 3G4 Tel: (613) 722-442 Fax: (613) 722-2799 May 14, 213 File: 1638823 Robinson Park Development Corp. 5699 Power Road Ottawa, ON, K1G 3N4
More informationWEST AND SOUTH WEST RING ROAD DOWNSTREAM TRAFFIC IMPACTS
Page 1 of 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alberta Transportation ( AT ) is preparing to construct the final sections of the Calgary Ring Road. This includes the South West Ring Road ( SWRR ) (from Lott Creek Blvd
More informationParking Lot P6C Transportation Impact Assessment
Transportation Carleton University Parking Lot P6C Transportation Impact Assessment Prepared by: AECOM 302 1150 Morrison Drive 613 820 8282 tel Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H 8S9 613 820 8338 fax www.aecom.com
More informationAbrams Associates. Transportation Impact Analysis. City of Rocklin. Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677
Transportation Impact Analysis Sierra College Boulevard Commercial Project City of Rocklin Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677 Prepared by: 1875 Olympic Boulevard,
More informationAppendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station
Appendix C NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station Prepared for: Regional Transportation Department and URS Corporation as part of the North Metro EIS David Evans and Associates,
More informationCOMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: First Bay Properties Inc. 311 Richmond Road, Suite 203 Ottawa, ON K1Z 6X3 August 8, 2017 117-663 Brief_1.doc
More information