IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
|
|
- Belinda Stewart
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 //01 1:1: PM 1CV IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ANDREA "AMY" LAING, ) ) CaseNo. ) Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT v. ) ) Personal Injuries - Failure to Exercise the ) Highest Degree of Care and Skill Practicable - TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN ) Negligence TRANSIT DISTRICT OF OREGON dba ) Filing Fees Based Upon ORS 1.(1)(e) TRI-MET, and GABE C. SUTHERLAND, ) Amount in Controversy: $,, ) (Not Subject to Mandatory Arbitration) Defendants. ) (Demand for Jury Trial) Plaintiff alleges: FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Against Defendant Tri-Met) COUNT ONE (Failure to Exercise the Highest Degree of Care and Skill Practicable) At all times material hereto: a) 1. Defendant Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District of Oregon dba Tri-Met ("TRI-MET"), was a public body owning and operating public transportation, including a light rail train system known as the Metropolitan Area Express ("MAX"), within the counties of Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas in the state of Oregon, with its principal offices located in the city of Portland, county of Multnomah, state of Oregon; b) Page I - COMPLAINT Defendant Gabe C. Sutherland ("SUTHERLAND") was employed by defendant Tri-Met as a MAX light rail train operator, and was acting within the course and scope of his employment; (0) - Portland, OR 0 /0) -
2 c) d) Plaintiff was a resident of the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon. The MAX Platform where the incident collision occurred is more particularly described as the "Elmonica/S.W. 10 th Avenue" stop, and serves Eastbound and Westbound Max trains on the Blue Line from a platform ("THE PLATFORM") that runs in east/west directions on both sides of the tracks on the east side of the intersection with S.W. 10 th Avenue, in the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon.. On or about November 1, 01, plaintiff was traveling on foot in a northerly direction on the sidewalk on the east side of S.W. 10 th Avenue, intending to cross the eastbound and IO westbound MAX tracks, and board a westbound MAX train that was stopped on the westbound (north) side of The Platform In order to cross the eastbound tracks and westbound tracks and enter the westbound 1 MAX Platform, a pedestrian travelling north on the east side of S.W. 10 th Avenue must make a 1 right tum of approximately forty-five degrees ( ), which takes the pedestrian's line of sight 1 away from the crossing gates and flashing lights, that are in place for the purpose of stopping 1 motor vehicles when a MAX train is approaching the Platform. The gates and flashing lights do 1 not block the sidewalk, which continues beyond the gates when the sidewalk meets the tracks. 1 There are no pedestrian safety gates or flashing warning lights in a pedestrian's line of sight 0 and/or line of travel after making the right-hand tum. There are no audible warning signals as 1 pedestrians approach the Platform here, once the bells stop ringing when the gates come down. n. When a MAX train approaches the Platform, automatic warning bells are activated that sound as the crossing arms start corning down for motorists travelling in both directions on S.W. 10 th Avenue. The crossing arms display red flashing lights in order to alert motorists to the danger of an approaching MAX train. Page - COMPLAINT 0 SW Washington Street. Suite 100 (0) - S. W. Morrison Street Portland, OR 0 /0) -
3 . The audible warning signals stop once the crossing gates reach the down position. At this point, the MAX train is still a significant distance away from the crossing, and at a time which is many seconds before the MAX train arrives at the Platform. While the crossing gates remain in the down position they continue to alert motorists to the danger of an approaching MAX train. However, these warning signals do not alert pedestrians of an approaching MAX train.. Defendant Tri-Met's Public Information Officer, Roberta Alstadt, acknowledged that: "There is a concern in the light rail industry that people may get focused on one train and not look to the other direction." Defendants Tri-Met and Sutherland, and each of them, knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known, prior to November 1, 01, of this concern 1 in the light rail industry As plaintiff was crossmg the east-bound MAX tracks while traveling on foot in a 1 northerly direction on the sidewalk to board the stopped westbound Max train at The Station, she 1 was struck by an eastbound MAX "out-of-service" train, operated by defendant Sutherland, 1 traveling in an easterly direction, pulling into the eastbound (south) side of the Platform After the front portion of the "out-of-service" MAX train struck plaintiff and ran over 0 her, defendant Sutherland activated the braking system. 1. At the time of the incident, plaintiff resided in the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon, just a short distance away from The Platform. Plaintiff frequently used the MAX trains for transportation, and was familiar with the procedures involved in taking the MAX. Plaintiff was on her way to work that morning and was taking the westbound MAX to get there. Page - COMPLAINT (0) - Portland, OR 0 (0) -
4 . There are numerous businesses, residences, apartment houses, and other types of buildings in the vicinity of the Platform, and a large volume of pedestrian traffic travels regularly through the S.W. 10 th Avenue intersection, and on both sides of The Platform at that location.. The presence of one or more of the following conditions combined to make The Platform unreasonably dangerous: Ill Ill a) b) c) d) e) f) The frequency of catastrophic and/or fatal incidents involving pedestrians/riders at other substantially similar platforms in the MAX light rail system; The dense population in that area, combined with the large amount of pedestrian traffic passing on and around The Platform, due to the number of businesses, residences, buildings, and apartment houses, located in direct proximity to the MAX light rail corridor in Beaverton; The intersection directly adjacent to the Platform had crossing gates equipped with flashing red lights that came down to block vehicular traffic, approaching from both directions on S.W. 10 th Avenue, from crossing the tracks as MAX trains were approaching, but had no similar crossing gates or structures that would close, block access to, or otherwise impede pedestrians on the sidewalk on the east side of S.W. 10 th Avenue when crossing the tracks as MAX trains were approaching; The intersection directly adjacent to The Platform had warning bells that began sounding an audible alarm approximately twenty (0) to thirty (0) seconds before a MAX train arrived at The Platform, but these warning bells would inexplicably stop ringing and sounding an alarm approximately ten () to fifteen (1) seconds prior to the arrival of the MAX train at The Platform; Many pedestrians may be focused on one train and not look for a train coming in the other direction; There were no swing gates for pedestrians that forced the person on foot to stop and open the gate, in order to get pedestrians to look both ways before they cross the tracks; Page - COMPLAINT (0) - Portland, OR 0 (0) -
5 g) h) Pedestrians entering the Platform on foot on the east side of the tracks travelling from south to north, intending to cross both sets of tracks and enter the westbound Platform, were forced to make an angled tum to the right, which diverted their attention away from the crossing gates and flashing lights that were already in position for motorists travelling on S.W. 10 th Avenue, alerting motorists, but not pedestrians, of a MAX train approaching The Platform. The large number of elderly, physically and developmentally challenged people that use The Platform. 1. The dangerous conditions at The Platform and at other substantially similar platforms located in the MAX light rail system have been repeatedly ignored by Tri-Met employees operating trains or otherwise working in the area of The Platform and other similar platforms in the MAX light rail system There have been numerous catastrophic injuries and fatalities involving pedestrians/riders 1 on the MAX light rail system since it opened in 1. As a result, the employees of defendant 1 Tri-Met, including its MAX train operators, are aware that defendant Tri-Met condones the 1 existence of the dangerous conditions in the vicinity of The Platform and the other substantially 1 similar crossings located in the MAX light rail system As a common carrier, defendant Tri-Met owes its passengers the highest care and skill 0 practicable. Defendant Tri-Met, acting independently and through defendant Sutherland, the 1 train operator who was acting within the course and scope of his employment, failed to exercise the highest degree of care and skill practicable on November 1, 01, in one or more of the following particulars: a) In maintaining the vicinity of The Platform in a dangerous condition for pedestrians/riders on the MAX light rail system; Ill Page - COMPLAINT (0) -ll Portland, OR 0 (0) -
6 b) c) d) e) f) g) In failing to warn the public of the dangerous conditions for pedestrians/riders on the MAX light rail system existing in the vicinity of The Platform; In failing to maintain crossing arms with flashing lights and/or a crossing gate in the intersection directly adjacent to The Platform that would automatically block the entrance of pedestrians on to the MAX tracks or redirect pedestrians as they entered The Platform crosswalk to a position where they could see MAX trains traveling in both directions at The Platform, similar to the system that was in effect to block the entry of motor vehicles on to the MAX tracks as a MAX train was approaching The Platform; In maintaining the intersection directly adjacent to the Platform with warning bells that began sounding an audible alarm signal approximately twenty (0) to thirty (0) seconds before a MAX train arrived at the Platform, but the warning bells inexplicably stopped ringing and sounding an audible alarm approximately ten () to fifteen (1) seconds prior to the arrival of the MAX train, such that pedestrians in general, and plaintiff in particular, was unable to hear any audible warning as she was attempting to cross the MAX tracks to board the westbound MAX train; In failing to keep and maintain a proper lookout; In failing to maintain adequate control over the MAX train; In failing to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians/riders of the MAX light rail system attempting to enter The Platform, including, but not limited to, plaintiff, 1 h) 1 1 i) j) k) Page - COMPLAINT In failing to sound an adequate audible warning on the train itself to warn pedestrians/riders of the MAX light rail system on or near The Platform as the approaching MAX train entered the area of The Platform; In failing to provide any audible or visual warnings to pedestrians and patrons of the MAX light rail system approaching The Platform, of approaching MAX trains, particularly in light of the fact defendants knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known, that many pedestrians may be focused on one train and not look for a train corning in the other direction; In entering the area of The Platform at a rate of speed that was greater than was reasonable and prudent considering the conditions then and there existing; In failing to adequately slow or stop the MAX train when the defendant Sutherland observed plaintiff approaching the MAX eastbound track on foot when it was clear to him that he didn't know whether plaintiff would stop for his MAX train; (0) - Portland, OR 0 (0) -
7 1) m) n) o) In failing to apply the "mushroom" brake on the MAX train when the defendant Sutherland observed plaintiff approaching the MAX eastbound track on foot when it was clear to him that he didn't know whether plaintiff would stop for his MAX train; In failing to maintain a physical barrier of any type to prevent pedestrians in general, and plaintiff in particular, from entering the portion of the sidewalk in the adjacent intersection that crossed the eastbound MAX tracks as an eastbound MAX train was approaching The Platform, particularly at a time when a westbound MAX train was already stopped at The Platform; In failing to maintain swing gates for pedestrians that "forces you to stop and then open the gate, in order to get pedestrians to look both ways before they cross"; In failing to maintain directional gates for pedestrians approaching the Platform that put the pedestrian in a position to see MAX trains coming into the Platform from both directions The failure of defendant Tri-Met to exercise the highest degree of care and skill practicable, 1 in one or more of the particulars set forth in,rt, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff to 1 suffer the following injuries: a) b) c) d) e) t) g) h) i) Traumatic amputation of right leg above knee; Fracture of multiple ribs ofleft side; Spleen laceration, acute; Thrombocytosis after splenectomy; Pleural effusion; Liver laceration, grade II, with open wound into cavity, acute; Inferior vena cava injury, acute; Injury of hepatic vein, acute; Extensive facial fractures; j) k) Page - COMPLAINT Open fracture of zygoma, acute; Closed fracture ofleft orbit, acute; (0) - Portland, OR 0 (0) -
8 1) m) Bilateral pulmonary contusion, acute; Heterotopic ossification at the site of traumatic above-knee-amputation ("AKA"). 1. As a result of the aforementioned injuries, plaintiff underwent the following surgical procedures: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) 1) Exploratory laparotomy; Splenectomy; Repair of the suprahepatic vena cava; Repair/ligation of the left hepatic vein; Vacuum assisted temporary abdominal closure; Guillotine completion of the AKA on the right; Abdominal washout and fascia closure; Serial washouts and debridements of right AKA site; Final wound closure; Closed reduction of nasal bone fracture; Insertion of pigtail catheter into left thoracic cavity for pleural effusion; Heterotopic ossification removal from previous traumatic AKA site The failure of defendant Tri-Met to exercise the highest degree of care and skill practicable, 0 in one or more of the particulars set forth in, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff to 1 undergo physical and mental pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of her capacity to engage in her normal and usual activities apart from work, in the past, present, and future, all to her noneconomic damage in a reasonable amount to be determined by the jury, but not to exceed the sum of$0,000, Ill Ill Page - COMPLAINT (0) - Portland. OR 0 /0) -
9 On account of the aforementioned injuries and symptoms, plaintiff has incurred reasonable and necessary medical expenses to date in the approximate sum of $0,000.00, and has lost wages to date in the approximate sum of $,000.00, all to her total economic damage to date in the approximate sum of$, On account of the aforementioned injuries and symptoms, plaintiff will incur future reasonable and necessary medical expenses in the approximate sum of $,00,000.00, and will incur future lost wages and/or future loss of earning capacity, in the approximate sum of $0,000.00, all to her future economic loss in the approximate sum of$,0, Plaintiff is entitled to interest at % per annum for her economically verifiable losses from the date of loss to the date of judgment. 1. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this Complaint at the time of trial to more completely allege her economic losses and/or to conform to proof offered at trial. 01. Ill. Notice of plaintiffs claim against defendant Tri-Met was provided on or about March 1, Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial.. COUNT TWO (Negligence) Plaintiffrealleges,r,r 1 through of Count One of her First Claim for Relief.. Page - COMPLAINT (0) - Portland. OR 0 (0) -
10 Defendant Tri-Met was negligent in one or more of the respects set forth in,1 above.. The negligence of defendant Tri-Met, in one or more of the particulars set forth in,1 above, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff to suffer the injuries set forth in,1, and undergo the surgical procedures set forth in,1.. The negligence of defendant Tri-Met, in one or more of the particulars set forth in,1 above, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff to incur damages as set forth in,,1 through 1 above. Relief. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Against Defendant Sutherland) (Negligence). Plaintiff realleges,, 1 through 1, and 1 through of Count One of her First Claim for. Defendant Sutherland was negligent in one or more of the following particulars: a) b) c) d) In failing to keep and maintain a proper lookout; In failing to maintain adequate control over the MAX train; In failing to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians/riders of the MAX light rail system attempting to enter The Platform, including, but not limited to, plaintiff when it was clear to him that he didn't know whether plaintiff would stop for his MAX train; In failing to sound the audible warning device on the MAX train itself in the form of a bell, to warn pedestrians/riders of the MAX light rail system on or near The Platform as the approaching MAX train entered the area of The Platform; Ill Page - COMPLAINT (0) - Portland, OR 0 (0) -
11 e) f) g) In failing to sound the audible warning device on the train itself in the form of a horn, to warn pedestrians/riders of the MAX light rail system on or near The Platform as the approaching MAX train entered the area of The Platform; In entering the area of The Platform at a rate of speed that was greater than was reasonable and prudent considering the conditions then and there existing; In failing to adequately slow or stop the MAX train when defendant Sutherland observed plaintiff approaching the MAX eastbound track on foot when it was clear to him that he didn't know whether plaintiff would stop for his MAX train; h) In failing to apply the "mushroom" brake on the MAX train when defendant Sutherland observed plaintiff approaching the MAX eastbound track on foot when it was clear to him that he didn't know whether plaintiff would stop for his MAX train; The negligence of defendant Sutherland, in one or more of the particulars set forth in,r 1 above, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff to suffer the injuries set forth in ill, and 1 undergo the surgical procedures set forth in ill The negligence of defendant Sutherland, in one or more of the particulars set forth in,r 1 above, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiff to incur damages as set forth in,r,rl through 0 1 above in Count One of her First Claim for Relief. 0 Ill 1 /// Ill Ill /// Ill Ill Page - COMPLAINT (0)- Portland, OR 0 (0) -
12 WHEREFORE plaintiff prays for judgment against defendants, and each of them, in the sum of $,,000.00, together with prejudgment interest on plaintiffs economically verifiable losses at the rate of % per annum from the date of loss to the entry of judgment, for her costs and disbursements incurred herein, and other relief as the court deems just and equitable. DATED this th day of August, 01. \. 1 1 Sonia A. Montalbano, OSB 01 ELLIOTT OSTANDER & PRESTON P.C. of Attorneys for Plaintiff Page 1 - COMPLAINT (0)- Portland, OR 0 (0) -
8/30/2018 3:03 PM 18CV38377
/0/ :0 PM CV 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROBERT A. SMITH, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Plaintiff, BRANDON LEE SWIGER, STATE OF OREGON AND CITY OF PORTLAND, v. Defendants. PLAINTIFF ALLEGES: FOR THE COUNTY
More information! ~'our; ''1., II CauNr '( FEB Plaintiff Edward W. Johnson, for his claim for relief for personal injuries, states as.
2 3 4 5 ENTERED FEB - 5 20 IN REGISTER BY RRM F!LtfiJ F[8 -s Alftq, 02 C/Jr,-.,,1~ f 0 R!tuL r/ 0! ~'our; ''1., II CauNr '( 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 EDWARD W. JOHNSON, vs. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF
More information10/16/2017 1:51:20 PM 17CV45539 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH
10/16/2017 1:51:20 PM 17CV45539 1 2 3 4 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 CRISSHA WN CLARK, v. Plaintiff, UNIVERSITY OF OREGON; DANA ALTMAN;
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Tammy LaPoint Case No. 320 Belinda Parkway Mt. Juliet, Tennessee 37122 Plaintiff v. Complaint Paul Dunkel 2952 Steamboat Drive JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HEREON
More informationENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ENFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION ENFIELD, CONNECTICUT TRANSPORTATION
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY
E-FILED IN COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 October :0 PM KEVIN STOCK COUNTY CLERK NO: --1-1 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR PIERCE COUNTY CARL W. SCHWARTZ and SHERRY SCHWARTZ, individually
More information$3.35 MILLION LAWSUIT ALLEGES ACCIDENT CAUSED BY FUNERAL HOME MISHANDLING OF PROCESSION
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin W. Glass, Ill 703-591-9829; 703-539-9490 cell Ben@BenGlassLaw.com, www.benglasslaw.com $3.35 MILLION LAWSUIT ALLEGES ACCIDENT CAUSED BY FUNERAL
More informationRegional School District #19 Transportation Policy
Regional School District #19 Transportation Policy I. Scope of Policy Many students attending E.O. Smith High School are transported by local boards of education, through written agreements with those
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION
STATE OF ILLINOIS SS. COUNTY OF COOK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION JOHN JAY LOOS, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, and CHICAGO CUBS BASEBALL CLUB, LLC
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY I. PARTIES
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY STACY TRUSSLER, an individual, vs. Plaintiff, STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendant. Case No.: --0- SEA COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR JURY TRIAL - 1 I.
More informationCASE NO. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Picheny Equestrian Enterprises, Inc. ("Picheny"), as and for its
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION Civil Action?- ( CASE NO. PICHENY EQUEST~AN ENTERPRisEs, IN~ "~mo CA 0 ~ 0 8 6 0 xxxx
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. KAYAK Software Corporation, by its attorneys, Foley & Lardner LLP, for its Complaint
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT KAYAK SOFTWARE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. HOTEL TONIGHT, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No.: 3:15-cv-450 COMPLAINT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED KAYAK Software
More informationDivision 1: Authorizations and Designations
6.01.010 Definitions. CHAPTER SIX: VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC CODE Subchapter 6.01: General Division 1: Authorizations and Designations The definition of words and phrases contained in the Vehicle Code of the
More informationBoard Policy Statement Transportation of Pupils Approved on June 1, 2015
Board Policy Statement 3541.00 - Transportation of Pupils Approved on June 1, 2015 The Board of Education shall provide for the transportation of children in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, a Colorado corporation, JEREMY HUDSON, and JAMES HUDSON, v. Plaintiffs, COLORADO ROCKIES
More informationParental Responsibilities
Bicycle riding is a fun way to exercise and enjoy the outdoors. To remain safe on Illinois roads, bicyclists must obey the same traffic safety laws that govern vehicle drivers. No amount of bicycle safety
More informationCase 1:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:16-cv-00271-BLW Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 11 Bradlee R. Frazer, ISB No. 3857 D. John Ashby, ISB No. 7228 William K. Fletcher, ISB No. 7950 HAWLEY TROXELL ENNIS & HAWLEY LLP 877 Main Street,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE RELIEF. Plaintiff, Defendants. I INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1 1 1 THE SEATTLE AFFILIATE OF THE OCTOBER ND COALITION TO STOP POLICE BRUTALITY, REPRESSION AND THE CRIMINALIZATION OF A GENERATION,
More informationFiling Fee: $88.00 Category: A
04-02-/10 14:00 FROM- T-006 P0001/0008 F-555 I J \ \..' - '~..._~v"/ Samuel A. Diddle, ISB No. 4967 EBERLE, BERLIN, KADING, TURNBOW & MCKLVEEN, CDTD. 1111 West Jefferson Street, Suite 530 Post Office Box
More informationCITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY
CITY OF SAINT JOHN TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY VERSION: 1.0 April 10, 2012 Pedestrians, Cyclists and Motorists Sharing Street Spaces CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 POLICY GOAL... 3 POLICY OBJECTIVES... 3 GUIDING
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION NICHOLAS COLUCCI, d/b/a EZ LINE PUTTERS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 6:08-cv-288-LED vs. CALLAWAY GOLF COMPANY, Defendant.
More information2007 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRIORITY LIST SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS TO PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE/MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION.
Traffic Engineering and Parking Divisions David C. Dryer, City Traffic Engineer and Parking Manager 215 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard P.O. Box 2986 Madison, Wisconsin 53701-2986 Phone 608 266 4761
More informationMEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner
MEMORANDUM Date: Updated August 22, 2017 To: Organization: Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner Boston Transportation Department From: Jason DeGray, P.E., PTOE, Regional Director of Engineering
More informationComplete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE Malibu Boats, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC, Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
More informationBICYCLE RULES OF THE ROAD
ILLINOIS ILLINOIS ILLINOIS ILLINOIS ILLINOIS ILLINOIS ILLINOIS ILLINOIS BICYCLE RULES OF THE ROAD Jesse White Secretary of State Bicycle riding is a great way to get into shape and enjoy the outdoors.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:16-cv-04162-ODE Document 15 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD, v. Plaintiff, TROPICAL
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. Case No.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY HENRY CLAYPOOL, 1819 North Hollister Street Arlington, Virginia 22205, ANDREW D. LEVY, 7029 Mink Hollow Road Highland, Maryland 20777, and KELLY BUCKLAND, 4432 Miniature
More informationOKLAHOMA SCHOOL BUS DRIVER MANUAL TRAINING MANUAL FOR OKLAHOMA SCHOOL BUS DRIVER CERTIFICATION
OKLAHOMA SCHOOL BUS DRIVER MANUAL TRAINING MANUAL FOR OKLAHOMA SCHOOL BUS DRIVER CERTIFICATION JANET BARRESI STATE SUPERINTENDENT of PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION It is the
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ADA. Case No.
Electronically Filed 10/3/2017 2:35 PM Fourth Judicial District, Ada County Christopher D. Rich, Clerk of the Court By: Rose Wright, Deputy Clerk Terri Pickens Manweiler/ISB #5828 Shannon N. Pearson/ISB
More informationMEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESTRICTING PARKING ADJACENT TO 170 AND 171 BRISCO ROAD
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: BY: TRAFFIC COMMISSION TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MATT HORN, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESTRICTING PARKING ADJACENT TO 170 AND 171 BRISCO ROAD DATE:
More informationCITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY
RMA-2015-ATM-038 CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY DATE: April 22, 2015 SUBJECT Approval of Roadway Modifications Recommended through an Area Traffic Management Study
More informationEXHIBIT R1. Neighborhood Cul-de-Sac Implementation
Neighborhood Cul-de-Sac Implementation The traffic study conducted for the Talaria project analyzed the amount of project traffic expected to use local, residential streets immediately north of the project
More informationSafe Railroad Crossing Procedures for School Bus Drivers
Safe Railroad Crossing Procedures for School Bus Drivers Reference Guide and Test Questions Produced by: Video Communications Introduction Railroad crossing procedures are one of the most important safety
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY WARREN CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. LAVONDA JOHNSON, GREG JOHNSON AND JALYN SAVAGE
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY WARREN CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. LAVONDA JOHNSON, GREG JOHNSON AND JALYN SAVAGE PLAINTIFFS V. COMPLAINT THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOWLING GREEN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
More informationA plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown
A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown February 2011 A plan for improved motor vehicle access on Railroad Avenue in Provincetown INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
More informationTHE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF TORRINGTON, CONNECTICUT TRANSPORTATION POLICY 6200
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF TORRINGTON, CONNECTICUT TRANSPORTATION Statement of Policy The Board of Education will provide transportation for students under provisions of state law and regulations. In determining
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA YAHOO! INC., v. Plaintiff, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS INCORPORATED, Defendants. Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. JOSEPH EHMAN, KRISTIN McINTOSH AND WILLIAM JOE BEAVER, Plaintiffs,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. JOSEPH EHMAN, KRISTIN McINTOSH AND WILLIAM JOE BEAVER, Plaintiffs, v. THE HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DENVER,
More information77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2732 SUMMARY
Sponsored by Representative BUCKLEY th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session House Bill SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body
More informationPREPARED TESTIMONY OF NICK CONNOR. Q. Please state your name, professional position, and business address.
Application 06-12-005 et al. Exhibit Date: August, 2008 PREPARED TESTIMONY OF NICK CONNOR Q. Please state your name, professional position, and business address. A. My name is Nick Connor. I presently
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DISTRICT
MALIBU BOATS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DISTRICT Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. NAUTIQUE BOAT COMPANY,
More informationOur Approach to Managing Level Crossing Safety Our Policy
Our Approach to Managing Level Crossing Safety Our Policy Our policy towards managing level crossing risk is: that we are committed to reducing the risk at level crossings where reasonably practicable
More informationMEMORANDUM. Background
MEMORANDUM DATE: September 2, 2013 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT: City of Fife Attn: Russ Blount 5411 23 rd Street East Fife, WA 98424 Al Tebaldi, PE 54 th Avenue East Crossing Safety Memorandum FIFE0000-0177-
More informationHow to Drive Near Trains
How to Drive Near Trains Approximate facilitation time: 20-30 minutes Materials How to Drive Safely Near Trains Video Test Your Train Safety Savvy Worksheets - enough copies for all students (& Master
More informationSidewalk Cafe City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
Section 16.50.370 Sidewalk Café Sections: 16.50.370.1 Generally 16.50.370.2 Declarations 16.50.370.3 Definitions 16.50.370.4 Permit Required 16.50.370.5 Application, Permit and Fee 16.50.370.6 Liability
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION THE NATIONAL BANK OF BLACKSBURG, v. Plaintiff, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:18-cv-00310-GEC
More informationSpecial education/504 students shall be adjudged on an individual basis, in accordance with their Individual Education Plans (IEPs)/504 Plans.
Business/Non-Instructional Operations 3541 Transportation Transportation services shall be provided by the Board for all students in grades kindergarten though twelve which it deems eligible for such service.
More informationIC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals
IC 9-21-3 Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals IC 9-21-3-0.5 "Pedestrian hybrid beacon" Sec. 0.5. As used in this chapter, "pedestrian hybrid beacon" means a traffic control signal used to warn and control
More informationNetwork Safeworking Rules and Procedures
Network Safeworking Rules and Procedures Rail Traffic Whistles Rule Number: 4007 Version 1.0, 31 March 2016 Rail Traffic Whistles Rule Number: 4007 Document Control Identification Document title Number
More informationCity of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY
4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY PURPOSE: Pedestrian crosswalks are an integral part of our transportation infrastructure. To be effective and promote safety, marked crosswalks must be installed after
More informationPedestrian Crossing Facilitation Guideline Development
Pedestrian Crossing Facilitation Guideline Development TZD Conference Melissa Barnes October, 2017 Why? Minnesota Go: Minnesota s multimodal transportations system maximizes the health of people, the environment,
More informationCorporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 NO: R1500 REGULAR COUNCIL. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998
R1500 : Traffic Safety at 25 Avenue and 128 Street Intersection Corporate NO: R1500 Report COUNCIL DATE: May 25, 1998 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: April 27, 1998 FROM: General Manager, Engineering
More informationStudent Pedestrian Safety Fiddlers Canyon Elementary Community Council 2012
Student Pedestrian Safety Fiddlers Canyon Elementary Community Council 2012 Introduction Fiddlers Canyon Elementary students must cross North Wedgewood Lane and Fiddlers Canyon Drive in order to come to
More information11/28/2016 VIA
11/28/2016 VIA EMAIL Ethan Meltzer, Assistant Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, Ca 95811 RE: Natomas Corporate Center Commercial Building
More informationDC CAUSE NO.
10 CITS-ESERVE DC-18-00398 CAUSE NO. FILED DALLAS COUNTY 1/11/2018 12:22 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK Christi Underwood RICHARD W. WALKER, individually and derivatively on behalf of NATIONAL CENTER
More informationYELLOWHEAD TRAIL / 149 STREET INTERCHANGE
YELLOWHEAD TRAIL / 149 STREET INTERCHANGE WELCOME Today we are introducing the concept planning project for a new gradeseparated interchange at Yellowhead Trail and 149 Street PURPOSE Provide information
More informationCIRCULAR NO. O-13. Recommended Practices for Manual Protection of Highway/Railway Grade Crossings
CIRCULAR NO. O-13 Recommended Practices for Manual Protection of Highway/Railway Grade Crossings Effective: October 1, 2004 CONTENTS 1. SCOPE 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES 3. DEFINITIONS 4. PROTECTION REQUIRED
More informationIf a person walks within this focus area, these are examples of the places he or she could walk to or from:
Portland Hillsdale Hillsdale Portland The Hillsdale focus area is located in the City of Portland. It is situated approximately three miles from the City of Portland s downtown, 5.5 miles from the City
More informationCase 2:13-cv RJS-EJF Document 2 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 21
Case 2:13-cv-00797-RJS-EJF Document 2 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 21 David L. Mortensen (#8242) dlmortensen@stoel.com Jose A. Abarca (#12762) jaabarca@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 201 South Main Street, Suite
More informationEmergency Roadside Technician Dies When Struck by a Single-Unit Truck on an Interstate Shoulder. Incident Number: 05KY001
Emergency Roadside Technician Dies When Struck by a Single-Unit Truck on an Interstate Shoulder Incident Number: 05KY001 Location on bridge where responder attempted to avoid semi. Kentucky Fatality Assessment
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA HSK LLC, d.b.a. ZEROREZ, Court File No. Plaintiff, vs. COMPLAINT United States Olympic Committee, Defendant. Plaintiff HSK LLC, for its Complaint against
More informationTraffic Signal Warrant Analysis Report
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Report US26: Springwater At-Grade Intersection key# 15773 US26 at SE 267 th Avenue (M.P. 16.24) and US26 at SE Stone Road (M.P. 16.77) Prepared by Katherine Carlos, E.I.
More informationIC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals
IC 9-21-3 Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals IC 9-21-3-0.5 "Pedestrian hybrid beacon" Sec. 0.5. As used in this chapter, "pedestrian hybrid beacon" means a traffic control signal used to warn and control
More informationArlington County, Virginia ~ National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Transportation and Land-Use Connections (TLC) Program
Arlington County, Virginia ~ National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Transportation and Land-Use Connections (TLC) Program May 4, 2011 Nature of the Problem European and US Best Practices
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: April 1, 219 To: Honorable City Council c/o City Clerk, Room 395, City Hall Attention: Honorable Mike Bonin, Chair, Transportation Committee From:
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION Civil Department ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION Civil Department 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CREEKSIDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., an Oregon non-profit corporation, v. Plaintiff,
More informationWorld Boxing Council Consejo Mundial de Boxeo
World Boxing Council Consejo Mundial de Boxeo No. PROFESSIONAL BOXER S COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT Boxer's name: Considering that the world Boxing Council WBC is the owner of its trademark, as well as of the
More informationCHAPTER 71: TRAFFIC RULES. Operation Generally. Accidents. Prohibitions
CHAPTER 71: TRAFFIC RULES Section 71.01 Obstructing traffic 71.02 Reverse or U turns 71.03 Backing vehicles 71.04 Vehicles crossing sidewalks 71.05 Speed limits 71.15 Duty of operator 71.16 Accident report
More informationDriver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations. Ms. Marx
Driver Education Ch. 4: Safe Driving Rules & Regulations Ms. Marx Speed Control Speed is one of the most common contributing factors of fatal & other types of accidents School zones, business or residential
More informationUS 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study
US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study DRAFT Technical Memorandum #6 Cost and Benefit Evaluation Methodology August 2016 Prepared for: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
More informationTown of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy
Town of Mooresville, North Carolina Neighborhood Traffic Calming and Control Device Policy Adopted January 6, 2014 Town of Mooresville Development Services Department TOWN OF MOORESVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
More informationDesigning Safety into Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Projects
Designing Safety into Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Projects February 13, 2017 Copyright 2016 by CTC, Inc. (CTC) Overview of Grade Crossing Safety 2 A train strikes a vehicle or person every 4 hours in U.S.
More informationCaltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns
Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns Revised: May 10, 2016 The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is planning various
More informationCHAPTER 37 BICYCLES, PLAY VEHICLES, SKATEBOARDS AND IN-LINE SKATES
CHAPTER 37 BICYCLES, PLAY VEHICLES, SKATEBOARDS AND IN-LINE SKATES 37.01 BICYCLE REGISTRATION. (1) Required. It shall be unlawful for any person to ride or operate a bicycle upon any street, alley, or
More informationALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY
ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY in City of Frostburg, Maryland January 2013 3566 Teays Valley Road Hurricane, WV Office: (304) 397-5508 www.denniscorporation.com Alley 24 Traffic Study January 2013 Frostburg, Maryland
More informationFor Signals Training Consortium Use Only
Introduction and Overview to Highway Grade Crossings Course 104 PARTICIPANT GUIDE Introduction and Overview to Highway Grade Crossings Participant Guide Signals Maintenance Training Consortium COURSE 104
More information3R RANCH OUTFITTERS, LLC 2016 HUNTING AGREEMENT
3R RANCH OUTFITTERS, LLC 2016 HUNTING AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Client (individually referred to herein as Client ) desires to engage 3R Ranch Outfitters LLC to provide hunting, guiding, camping and related outdoor
More information2004 NC Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
2004 NC Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) CHAPTER 4D. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL FEATURES Section 4D.04 Meaning of Vehicular Signal Indications Standard: Vehicular traffic
More information$ 12" $#&%$ 86.) *1! *1 /3 )00, , (1* Neighborhood Traffic Calming Part 3 Solutions Bradley William Yarger, P.E.
$ 12" $#&%$ 86.)3+5+2 714 *1! *1 /3 )00,12 3.+ -0127 1, (1* Neighborhood Traffic Calming Part 3 Solutions by Bradley William Yarger, P.E. It is extremely tempting to jump to this step of the process thinking
More informationAppendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD
Appendix T CCMP 3.3.4 TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD 3.3.4 Trail Traffic and Transportation Design Multi-use trails have certain design standards, which vary depending on the agency that
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. PARTIES
Ball & Chain LLC v. TUTM ENTERTAINMENT, INC. Doc. 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE BALL & CHAIN LLC, a Washington limited liability company, v. Plaintiff, TUTM
More informationC/CAG. Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit. San Mateo-Foster City School District JUNE 2013
Sunnybrae Elementary School Walking and Bicycling Audit JUNE 2013 San Mateo-Foster City School District C/CAG City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County SUNNYBRAE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WALKING
More informationtwo or more produces 3.3 Impounding of Unregistered released
OFFICIAL POLICY Bicycle Operation and Parking Policy 1.0 PURPOSE: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the safety of bothh users of bicycles and the College of Charleston community as a whole and to
More informationSENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 1, 2018
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY, 0 Sponsored by: Senator TROY SINGLETON Assemblywoman CAROL A. MURPHY Assemblyman HERB CONAWAY, JR. Assemblyman DANIEL R. BENSON District
More informationORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Downtown Bellingham and the Fairhaven commercial core are places where people come to play, work, shop, and live;
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BELLINGHAM, WASHINGTON AMENDING BELLINGHAM MUNICIPAL CODE PROVISIONS 10.24.070, 11.48.140, 11.52.010, EXTENDING THE HOURS OF RESTRICTION FOR SITTING AND LYING
More informationFORKLIFT SAFETY LESSONS FOR THE SAFE PEDESTRIAN
FORKLIFT SAFETY LESSONS FOR THE SAFE PEDESTRIAN This easy-to-use Leader s Guide is provided to assist in conducting a successful presentation. Featured are: INTRODUCTION: A brief description of the program
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Civil Division)
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Civil Division) NIEVES COLON and RICHARD COLON, as Legal Guardians of the Person of Prichard Colon, an incapacitated person, and PRICHARD COLON, Individually
More informationCase Doc 1 Filed 10/06/09 Entered 10/06/09 18:33:53 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11
Document Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ARENA FOOTBALL LEAGUE, LLC, Debtor. ARENA FOOTBALL LEAGUE, LLC, v. Plaintiff, ARENA FOOTBALL ONE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHICAGO NATIONAL LEAGUE ) BALL CLUB, LLC ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNDER ARMOUR, INC. ) JURY
More informationATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION
ATTACHMENT NO. 11 RRLRT No. 2 TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: TOPIC: Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION RRLRT TC Draft: 06/23/2011 RRLRT TC Approval: 06/27/2014
More informationAppendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions
Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions PHYSICAL MEASURES Central Hatching The major consideration of this feature is that, these markings can only be laid down the centre of
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2002 MARLENE SEELBINDER and JAMES SEELBINDER, etc., Appellants, v. CASE NO. 5D00-3308 COUNTY OF VOLUSIA, etc., Appellee.
More informationUS Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting
Town of Nags Head US Hwy. 64/264 Pedestrian Crossing at the Little Bridge Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting Prepared by: Department of Public Works August 8, 2013 Where traffic-control signals are not
More informationCROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT
CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT Many factors contribute to the need for a Crossing Guard. General federal guidance, provided by the FHWA MUTCD, states that adult crossing guards
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX
TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX Traffic control devices are those official signs and striping placed in the public right-of-way and recognized by the public such as STOP signs, curve warning signs, centerline
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-5185 v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CHI-TOWN VAPERS LLC; CHI-TOWN
More informationWELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018
WELCOME Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018 MEETING AGENDA 1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Study Progress Update 3. Problem Statement 4. Technical Analysis
More informationLevine v USA Cycling, Inc NY Slip Op 33177(U) December 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Bernard J.
Levine v USA Cycling, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 33177(U) December 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 515257/15 Judge: Bernard J. Graham Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationDriftwood Outfitters 1851 Grassy-Narrow C.P. 60, Moffet, Québec JOZ2W0
Driftwood Outfitters 1851 Grassy-Narrow C.P. 60, Moffet, Québec JOZ2W0 2017 Hunting Agreement WHEREAS, Client #1, Client #2, Client #3 _, and Client #4, (individually referred to herein as Client or collectively
More information