A dominant recessive trend and the main implications of the current technological trajectories for industrial policy Mario Cimoli
1. A dominant recessive trend in global trade/ growth 2. Transformation global economy: new paradigms/ reshoring/space for policies 3. On the political economy of industrial policy 4. A note on the economists: errare humanum est, perseverare autem diabolicum
A dominant recessive trend in global trade/ growth
1952 1955 1958 1961 1964 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 World trade grew faster than GDP during most of the postwar period 20 ANNUAL VARIATIONS IN GLOBAL GOODS EXPORTS VOLUMES AND GLOBAL GDP, 1952-2014 (Percentages) 15 10 5 7.8 8.6 5.4 3.9 6.5 5.3 2.6 0-5 -10-15 European Community 1957 China s opening 1978 Fall of the Berlin Wall 1989 Exports GDP Average export growth Source: ECLAC, on the basis of data from the WTO and IMF.
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 but it lost momentum since 2008-2009 ANNUAL VARIATIONS IN GLOBAL GOODS EXPORTS BY VALUE AND VOLUME, 1992-2015 a (Percentages) 30 20 10 0-10 -20-30 Price Volume Value Source: ECLAC, on the basis of Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB), World Trade Database. a Figures for 2015 are ECLAC projections.
A dominant recessive trend SELECTED GROUPINGS AND COUNTRIES: BALANCE-OF-PAYMENTS CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCES, 1997-2015 a (Percentages of GDP) 2.5% 1.5% 0.5% Surplus countries do not absorb exports of deficit countries -0.5% -1.5% Deficit countries have to adjust 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015-2.5% China Japan Euro Area without Germany and the Netherlands Latin America without Venezuela (B.R.) Germany and the Netherlands USA Oil Exporting Countries Lack of reciprocity Source: ECLAC, on the basis of International Monetary Fund, 2015 External Sector Report, Washington, DC, 27 July 2015. a Figures for 2015 are projections.
A deep decoupling between financial and real activities EXTERNAL FINANCIAL ASSETS a AND SELECTED REAL VARIABLES WORLDWIDE, 2003-2013 (Indices, 2003=100) 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Exports of Goods and Services Financial Assets Gross Capital Formation World GDP Source: ECLAC, on the basis of data from the IMF, UNCTAD and the World Bank. a Calculated on the basis of each country s international investment position.
2000-01-01 2000-11-01 2001-09-01 2002-07-01 2003-05-01 2004-03-01 2005-01-01 2005-11-01 2006-09-01 2007-07-01 2008-05-01 2009-03-01 2010-01-01 2010-11-01 2011-09-01 2012-07-01 2013-05-01 2014-03-01 2015-01-01 2000-02-01 2001-02-01 2002-02-01 2003-02-01 2004-02-01 2005-02-01 2006-02-01 2007-02-01 2008-02-01 2009-02-01 2010-02-01 2011-02-01 2012-02-01 2013-02-01 2014-02-01 2015-02-01 Internal demand in China has not responded sufficiently to expansionary monetary policies, similar to developed economies 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 The main interest rate tends to zero China, Eurozone, Japan, United States: policy rates, 2000-2015 (Percentages) Despite QE, inflation does not pick up China, Eurozone, Japan, United States: inflation rates, 2000-2015 (Percentages) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0-2 -4-6 Usa Area Euro Japan Japón Euro Area Usa Source: ECLAC, based on data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Sain LouisFuente: CEPAL, sobre la base de datos de Banco Federal de la Reserva de St. Louis, and Federal Reserve Economic Data and Statitics Bureau of Japan
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Aggregate demand is less dynamic after the crisis 8 EURO AREA, JAPAN AND UNITED STATES: CONTRIBUTION OF AGGREGATE DEMAND COMPONENTS TO GDP GROWTH, 2000-2014 (Percentages) 6 4 2 0-2 -4-6 -8 Japan Euro Area United States Private consumption Government consumption Gross capital formation Net exports GDP growth Source: ECLAC, on the basis of data from the OECD.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Feb-10 Jun-10 Oct-10 Feb-11 Jun-11 Oct-11 Feb-12 Jun-12 Oct-12 Feb-13 Jun-13 Oct-13 Feb-14 Jun-14 Oct-14 Feb-15 Jun-15 Since 2009 the Chinese economy is decelerating CHINA: ANNUAL VARIATIONS IN SELECTED ECONOMIC INDICATORS a (Percentages) GDP (2000-2015) Industrial production and retail sales (2010-2015) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 23 21 19 17 15 13 11 9 7 5 Industrial Production Retail Sales Source: ECLAC, based on IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2015 (GDP) and the National Bureau of Statistics of China (for industrial production and retail sales). a Figures for 2015 are projections.
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Utilization levels have not recovered 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Installed capacity utilization, 1995-2015 (Percentages) 85% 83% 81% 79% 77% 75% 73% 71% 69% 67% 65% United States 87% 85% 83% 81% 79% 77% 75% 73% 71% 69% 67% 65% Eurozone Source: ECLAC, based on data from Eurostat and the United States Federal Reserve.
the same happens at the sectoral level and excess capacity sends prices tumbling in China 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Automobile industry in Brazil LEVEL OF UTILIZATION OF INSTALLED CAPACITY (PERCENTAGES) 90 88 86 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 70 World copper refining 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6-7 CHINA: Annual variation of industrial producer prices 2000-2015 a (percentage)
1931 1933 1935 1937 1939 1941 1943 1945 1947 1949 1951 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Between 2012 y 2015, the region has its worst export performance in 8 decades 80 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: ANNUAL VARIATION IN EXPORT VALUE AND VOLUME, 1931-2015 (Percentages) 60 40 20 0-20 -40-23.4-5.8 Volume Price Value Source: ECLAC, based on ECLAC, América Latina: relación de precios de intercambio, Cuadernos Estadísticos de la CEPAL, Nº 1, Santiago, 1976 and data from regional indices.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Regional exports are projected to drop 14% in 2015, the third straight year of ever larger declines in their value 30 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: ANNUAL VARIATION IN MERCHANDISE EXPORTS, 2000-2015 a (Percentages) 20 10 0-10 1.0-15.0-20 -14.0-30 Volume Price Value Source: ECLAC, based on official figures from the countries central banks, customs offices and national institutes of statistics. a Figures for 2015 are projections.
2000 2001 2002 Regional imports will drop 10% in value 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: ANNUAL VARIATION IN MERCHANDISE IMPORTS, 2000-2015 a (Percentages) 30 20 10 0-10 -8.5-1.5-10.0-20 -30 Volume Price Value Source: ECLAC, based on official figures from the countries central banks, customs offices and national institutes of statistics. a Figures for 2015 are projections.
Intraregional exports fall more than exports to the rest of the world 40 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: VARIATION IN INTRAREGIONAL AND EXTRAREGIONAL EXPORTS BY VALUE, 2005-2015 a (Percentages) 30 20 10 0-10 -12-20 -30 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015-23 Intra-Regional Extra-Regional Source: ECLAC, based on official figures from the countries central banks, customs offices and national institutes of statistics. a Figures for 2015 are projections.
In 2015, there is a drop in the region s exports to all its main trading partners LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: VARIATION IN THE VALUE OF EXPORTS TO SELECTED MARKETS, 2014 AND 2015 a (percentages) América Latina y el Caribe -21-9 Asia (incluida China) -19-6 Unión Europea -17-6 China -16-9 Mundo -14-3 Estados Unidos -10 3-25.0-20.0-15.0-10.0-5.0 0.0 5.0 2015 2014 Source: ECLAC, based on official figures from the countries central banks, customs offices and national institutes of statistics. a Figures for 2015 are projections.
Trade with China has lost momentum and exports have fallen for two years Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN : ANNUAL VARIATION IN VALUE OF TRADE WITH CHINA, 2008 A 2015 (Percentages) 130 110 90 70 50 30 10-10 -30-50 Exports Imports Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC ) on the basis of data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China.
For China, the region is relatively unimportant, except as a supplier of commodities CHINA: STRUCTURE OF IMPORTS OF GOODS BY REGION OF ORIGIN, 2013 (Percentages ) 100 80 10 4 5 20 28 66 54 53 60 63 53 44 40 20 0 10 2 6 15 14 Commodoties (32%) Intermediate goods (29%) 27 29 11 13 9 8 8 15 11 4 7 7 Machinery and equipment (14%) Consumer goods (10%) Goods for miixed use (9%) Total Latin America and the Caribbean United States European Union Rest of Asia Rest of the world Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC ), based on the database Trade Flows Characterization of the Centre d Etudes Prospectives et d Informations Internationales (CEPII).
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Commodity prices: the 40 years that were just 9 WORLD PRICES OF SELECTED COMMODITY GROUPS, 2000-2015 a (Indices, 2005 = 100) LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES: PROJECTED AVERAGE VARIATION IN EXPORT PRICES, 2015 250 Caribbean (-20%) 200 150 100 Central America (-7%) Colombia (-29%) Ecuador (-29%) Venezuela, B.R. (-47%) Brazil (-16%) 50 0 Peru (-15%) Bolivia, P.S. (-25% Paraguay (-11%) Energy Agricultural raw materials Minerals and metals Non-energy commodities Foods Chile (-13%) Uruguay (-7%) Argentina (-17%) Source: ECLAC, based on data from the World Bank, the IMF and The Economist Intelligence Unit. a Values for 2015 are estimates. Source: ECLAC based on data from COMTRADE, World Bank, FAO, UNCTAD and the US Departaments of Commerce and Labor.
Transformation global economy: new paradigms/ reshoring / space for policies / growth
Changes in the approach to industrial policy in Europe and the U.S. Manufacturing is crucial because It dominates trade balances It is the engine for growth in other sectors It fosters technological development: it is over-represented in R&D and creates local spillovers It creates high-wage jobs (In the U.S., the new discourse emphasizes the importance of industrial employment as a support for the middle class) The loss of manufacturing not only destroys jobs but also destroys innovative advantages The relocation of manufacturing is accompanied by the relocation of high value-added services. Not all industries are equally important: some generate more growth and productivity gains.
Evidence of a paradigm shift in the location of industrial production A tendency to stop the out-shoring of some industries (particularly in the U.S.) explained by: The gap in labor costs compared to China has been reduced. Technical change towards greater automation reduces the importance of labor costs. Transportation costs (energy) and logistics (time) become increasingly important. Increased importance of the proximity of production and design to promote R&D Changes in the visions of the leading business schools Some evidence from the U.S. and the UK MIT's Supply Chain Forum of Innovation: 33% of firms with overseas production, considered returning to the U.S., 15% had already made the decision (2012). Boston Consulting Group: Made in America, Again. Why Manufacturing will Return to the U.S., 2011 UK Government Office for Science: The future of manufacturing: A new era of opportunity and challenge for the UK, 2013
United States Germany Japan Brazil Mexico Russia India China South Africa China is reducing the imported content of its exports, specially in high tech products 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 SELECTED COUNTRIES: IMPORTED CONTENT IN GOODS AND SERVICES EXPORTS, 1995, 2005 AND 2011 (Percentages) CHINA: IMPORTED CONTENT OF EXPORTS BY SECTOR, 1995, 2005 AND 2011 (Percentages) Total Exports Services High-Tech Industries Medium-High-Tech Industries Low-Medium-Tech Industries Low-Tech Industries 0 Manufacturing (Total) Mining Agriculture 1995 2005 2011 0 20 40 60 80 2011 2005 1995 Source: ECLAC, based on data from the OECD/WTO Trade in Value Added (TiVA) database.
For China, the region is relatively unimportant, except as a supplier of commodities 100 80 China: Structure of imports of goods by region of origin, 2013 (Percentages ) 10 4 5 20 28 66 54 53 60 63 53 44 40 20 0 10 2 6 15 14 Commodoties (32%) Intermediate goods (29%) 27 29 11 13 9 8 8 15 11 4 7 7 Machinery and equipment (14%) Consumer goods (10%) Goods for miixed use (9%) Total Latin America and the Caribbean United States European Union Rest of Asia Rest of the world Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC ), based on the database Trade Flows Characterization of the Centre d Etudes Prospectives et d Informations Internationales (CEPII).
On the political economy of industrial policy
Labour productivity 2011 (2005 Dollars) Social expenditure, productivity and income distribution (Gini) 100000 United States, 38 Ireland, 33.1 Denmark, 25.2 90000 80000 Australia, 33.4 Sweden, 26.9 Finland, 26 70000 60000 Singapur, 44.8 Hong Kong, 43.1 Canada, 32 New Zealand, 31.7 50000 40000 Korea, 31.1 30000 20000 10000 0 Mexico, 47.2 Chile, 50.1 Uruguay, 45.3 Argentina, 44.5 Venezuela, 44.8 Colombia, 55.9 Brazil, 54.7 Ecuador, 49.3 Costa Rica, 50.7 Peru, 48.1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Social expenditure 2010 (% GDP) Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC ), based on INDSTAT4 2013, UNIDO; World Development Indicators, World Bank; COMTRADE; Laborstat, ILO; CEPALSTAT; OECD
Social expenditure - Labour productivity (1990 = 100) 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY SOCIAL EXPENDITURE % GDP Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC ), based on World Development Indicators, World Bank; CEPALSTAT; Laborstat, ILO
Social expenditure - Labour productivity (1990 = 100) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 SOCIAL PROTECTION EDUCATION HEALTH HOUSING AND OTHERS LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC ), based on World Development Indicators, World Bank; CEPALSTAT; Laborstat, ILO
Nominal depreciations of several currencies in the region have not boosted exports Selected countries: Monthly nominal exchange rate index, January 2000 July 2015 (indices January 2000 = 100) Source: ECLAC, based on official figures
Moreover, the region s trade deficit more than doubles in 2015 as a share of GDP LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN (SELECTED GROUPINGS AND COUNTRIES): TRADE BALANCES, 2014-2015 (Percentages of GDP) 3.0 2.5 2.7 2.0 1.5 1.6 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0-0.7-0.1-0.5-0.2-0.2-1.5 Oil exporters Mineral exporters Latin American and the Caribbean -1.2-1.2 Mexico Brazil 2014 2015 Source: ECLAC, based on official figures from the countries central banks, customs offices and national institutes of statistics.
You remember when most economists said that industrialization should decline manufacturing was equal to any other economic activity markets were the most efficient mechanisms for allocating resources in open economies. Thus, in many countries, industrial policy institutions and instruments were dismantled Other dicta: Growing importance of services / services as the new focus of innovation Growing share of services in international trade The financial sector auto-regulates and expands harmoniously Global value chains, free trade and specialization as substitutes for industrial policy Innovation not contingent upon production (different localizations) China: the only factory, today and in the future Natural recourses as the base for innovation and growth
Sources of development and innovation What others told Growing importance of services for growth and innovation Services as the new focus of innovation What evidence indicates Manufacturing is (was and will be ) the main field of innovation. E.g. microprocessor, biotech, nanotech, etc. Most advanced services are technological spin-offs of manufacturing (software, telecoms) Growing importance of services in the trade balance Manufactured goods dominate in international trade
Industrial/ technological policies (1) What other told No need for industrial policy / firms and countries are similar Global value chains, free trade and specialization are substitutes for industrial policy The new technological paradigms lead to industry maturity Disconnection between innovation and production (different localizations) What evidence indicates Upgrading countries technological capabilities requires industrial policies Growing management costs of long global value chains (changes on the location paradigm) New technologies transform all industrial opportunities (what is mature today, could be highly innovative tomorrow. The Vernon cycle is static.) Innovation is strongly linked to manufacturing and other types of production (learning, geographical proximity, tacit knowledge) Abundance economics (prices of new products decrease, connectivity increases and becomes faster, acceleration of robot capabilities)
Industrial/ technological policies (2) What others told What evidences indicate No re-shoring of manufacturing: China is and will continue to be the only factory of the world Natural resources are a basis for innovation and growth Countries are not firms, and can lose their industrial capabilities/ commons Static view of production and technology New technologies are built upon existing industrial capabilities Risk from global value chains management Re-shoring of production in advanced countries There are few activities related to natural resources that are sources of complementary assets
Relative profit rates: lock in effects in the production structure Latin America: Proft rate on assets, weighted average, 2000-2005 y 2006-2010 a (In percentage) Fuente: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), sobre la base de datos proporcionados por el Departamento de estudios y proyectos especiales de la revista Améric economía. Source: ECLAC, based on the database provided by Revista América Economía.
Technological capabilities Require time; Are subject to path-dependency, i.e. the evolution of capabilities depends on previous experience and directions of past learning; Complementarities between sectors and capabilities, externalities and increasing returns are crucial for industry and the economy alike; Irreversibility in the building of certain physical and technological assets, which cannot be abandoned or replaced; A critical tacit component that could not be obtained from importing capital goods nor from manuals or other forms of codified information; Countries and firms which are closer to the technological frontier have a growing advantage in innovation with respect to the laggards. Cumulative processes leading to vicious or virtuous cycles explain why some countries move to a path where learning, production capabilities and institutions interact virtuously, while others remain in a hysteresis state, e.g., in a low-growth (divergence) trap.
A note on the economists: errare humanum est, perseverare autem diabolicum