Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Similar documents
Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Roadways. Roadways III.

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Aurora Corridor to E Line

WHAT IS BRT? Jack M. Gonsalves, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. February 22, 2012

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Public Consultation Centre

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

Item Description: Presentation and Discussion: Berkeley Rapid Transit Locally Preferred Alternative

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Item B1 November 19, 2009

ADVANCED TRANSIT OPERATIONS AND MODELING

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Kansas City Area Transportation Authority. Downtown Transit Improvement Vision 2/11/15

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Swift Bus Rapid Transit. June DeVoll, Community Transit & Tom Hingson, Everett Transit

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

1. Provide a dedicated westbound approach bus lane at the intersection;

NORTH TURNAROUND. Recommended Design: Expand the existing transit terminal

Markham Sports, Entertainment and Cultural Centre Transportation Overview

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

ON STREET TRANSIT PRIORITY MEASURES PUTTING BUSES FIRST IN WINNIPEG

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

From Disarray to Complete Street:

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Welcome. Welcome to the second open house on the Downtown Transportation Study.

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

TRB Managed Lanes Conference May 22 24, 2012, Oakland, CA

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

Service Development 1600 Franklin Street, Oakland CA 94612

M14A/D Select Bus Service

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

C Line Rapid Bus Preliminary Station Design

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

Bus Queue Jump (Lane) Utilization: A case study in Calgary, AB Canada Muhammad Asim P.Eng, M.Sc. The City of Calgary

York Region Rapid Transit Corporation

Today s Agenda. Welcome & Introductions. I-526 Lowcountry Corridor Update. Table Discussions. Next Steps / Conclusion

Baseline Road Rapid Transit: Bayshore Station to Prince of Wales Drive

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

A Federal Perspective on Congestion Pricing. Wayne Berman Federal Highway Administration July 8, 2010

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

4 Ridership Growth Study

Tempe Green Team. Katelyn Roberts, Ryan Souter, Danielle Vermeer, Jake Wilson

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

Joseph Iacobucci. James Czarnecky, AICP

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Complete Streets: Policy Framework Complete Streets: Implementation Plans A more Complete Street: Laurier Bike Lane Pilot Project

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Short-Term Enhancements Improvements to keep Austin moving. MetroRapid

El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit Conceptual Engineering. Los Altos Council Workshop January 24, 2012

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

York Region Population and Employment Growth

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Transcription:

Transit Planning Committee #1 March 19, 2015

Scope of the Transit Priority Project Review of the 2010 plan Analysis of Transit Priority Measures Preliminary plans for rapid transit Recommendations for short-, mid-, and long-term improvements to Guelph Transit system Stakeholder involvement: transit riders, businesses, University of Guelph, Transit Planning Committee Final report: July 2015 Presentation to City Council: late summer 2015

Rapid Transit: What Is It? Rapid Transit a mode of public transportation that gets riders from one place to another faster than conventional, local bus service. Can include subways, light rail, or Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Brampton Cape Town St. Paul

Common Features of Bus Rapid Transit To decrease travel times: Fewer stops than local routes Dedicated right-of-way Bus priority at intersections Other transit priority measures Calgary Los Angeles Waterloo

Common Features of Bus Rapid Transit To speed the boarding process: Off-board fare collection Platforms level with the floor of the bus To enhance the transit-riding experience: Stops with greater amenities, high-quality shelters, and more service information Larger-capacity vehicles for less crowding Smoother ride Santiago, Chile York Region

BRT Lite : What It Can Look Like Euclid Ave Cleveland Note: Not all features may be applied in Guelph SIGNAL PRIORITY REAL-TIME PASSENGER INFO SHELTERED WAITING AREAS OFF-BUS TICKETING VARIOUS OPERATORS BUS LANES LOW-FLOOR BUSES LEVEL WITH PLATFORMS

Expected Benefits of Rapid Transit / BRT Transit / Traffic Operations - Reduces travel times - Greater reliability of service - Increased ridership and mode share translates to fewer cars on the road - Improves overall traffic safety Quality of Life - Potential for increased development along BRT lines - Intensification of land use means less sprawl - More people using transit equals fewer carbon emissions and better air quality and health Source Kane County, Illinois; countyofkane.org

Rapid Transit Corridors Being Considered for Guelph Gordon / Norfolk / Woolwich (Woodlawn to City Limit) Stone Road (Watson to Hanlon) Speedvale Avenue (Elmira to Victoria) Woodlawn Road (Elmira to Victoria)

Transit Priority Measures: What Are They? Potential tools for giving priority to transit vehicles in addition to moving traffic more quickly through the City: Regulatory Measures Special rules for transit Transit Signal Priority Passive and active signal phasing for the benefit of buses Physical Measures Allow buses to avoid traffic congestion For maximum effectiveness, use TPMs in combination and over the length of a transit corridor.

Transit Priority Measures: Opportunities Common examples: Transit Signal Priority Transit-only Signals Queue Jump Lanes Reversible Lanes Reserved Bus Lanes High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes Roundabouts

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Source http://www.actransit.org/project-elements Buses communicate with traffic signals If a bus is behind schedule, green phase is extended to allow bus to proceed through intersection Useful for far-side bus stops Not useful for frequent buses (can t extend every cycle) May increase delay for cross (minor) street Signal takes a few cycles to get back into sync

Transit-only Signals Buses can use their own signals or phases to make turns or move unhindered by general traffic.

Queue Jump Lanes Buses get a head start at a red light over queued cars Can use queue jump to allow buses to turn left from a right-side stop Advance signal long enough to clear right turning cars (if queue jump is shared between buses and cars) Bus operates conventionally if approaching on a green phase Source http://www.actransit.org/project-elements/

Reversible Lanes Tidal flow operation, with more lanes in the peak direction during peak periods. The extra lane can be dedicated to transit use Left turns usually prohibited during peak periods Brisbane Toronto

Reserved Bus Lanes Bus-only lanes to avoid transit delays in mixed traffic (24/7 or peaks) Markham / Vaughan New York Nantes Brisbane

High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes Reserved lanes for priority vehicles Buses Carpools (2+ or 3+) Taxis Bikes, motorcycles, taxis, electric vehicles may be allowed 24/7 or peak-only Curb, median, or queue-jump Complement TDM measures

Roundabouts Not a TPM per se, but reduced delay can benefit buses Statistically much safer for drivers and pedestrians than conventional intersections Less idling = reduced emissions Cut-through roundabout (below) can be built for transit vehicles

Potential Locations of Traffic Priority Measures (TPMs)

Transit Priority Measures When do They Work? Does the TPM contribute to one or more of: Strategic Benefit Support City policies Travel Time and Service Reliability Improve speed Allow buses to run to timetable Reliable trip times respond to key customer concern Cost Efficiency Encouraging transit use relieves pressure on road capacity Better transit fleet utilization Passenger Comfort Improved amenities attract users

Next Steps in the Project Collect and analyze data, establish warrants and guidelines Determine best locations, costs, and timelines for implementation of Transit Priority Measures Develop preliminary plans for rapid transit Continue stakeholder involvement Complete final report and make recommendations to City Council Planning Committee Session # 2: Thursday, May 28 2:00 to 3:00 pm Public Event: Wednesday, June 3 6:00 to 9:00 pm; City Hall