Decision on North Waterloo Routing

Similar documents
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Project. Environmental Assessment (EA) Presentation Public Hearing June 22, 2017

Welcome to the Open House

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Station Plan: Penn & 43rd Avenue

Municipal Class EA To Address Traffic Congestion On The Ontario Street Corridor (Grand Bend) Public Information Meeting June 4, 2018

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

Tonight is an opportunity to learn about the Study and ask questions of the Study Team members.

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Terwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House!

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Bringing Active Transportation and Station Area Plans to Life

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Scarlett Road Bridge & Road Improvements Lambton Park Community School - Gymnasium Tuesday November 28 th, 2017

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Chair Jim Wideman and Members of the Planning and Works Committee. Recommended Intersection Modifications at Mill Street and Ottawa Street

McKenzie Interchange Project Spring 2016 Comment Period. Appendix 1: Display Boards and Feedback Form

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

4. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Baseline Road Rapid Transit: Bayshore Station to Prince of Wales Drive

5. MODIFICATIONS AT JEANNE D ARC BOULEVARD/REGIONAL ROAD 174 INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION - PUBLIC HEARING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Implementation Options

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

1. Provide a dedicated westbound approach bus lane at the intersection;

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

Dundas. Plan Propose. ed North Northea Town

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

102 Avenue Corridor Review

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services

ITEM 2.3 South of Fraser Rapid Transit Surrey-Langley technology decision. That the Mayors Council on Regional Transportation receive this report.

Light Rail Transit in North Central Calgary Open House and Workshop Summary. Summer 2013

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Dundas Street (Regional Road 5) Corridor Improvements Class EA. Welcome to Public Information Centre #3. Thursday, September 13, 2012

6 Screen 3 Analysis and Results

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

McKenzie Interchange Project Fall 2015 Engagement. Appendix 2: Engagement Materials and Feedback Form

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

C Line Rapid Bus Preliminary Station Design

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Prince George s County plans, policies, and projects

Downey Road. Transportation Improvement Study

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

Item Description: Presentation and Discussion: Berkeley Rapid Transit Locally Preferred Alternative

AIRPORT ROAD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

Anniedale- Tynehead NCP Best Practices in Transportation Planning Summary

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Complete Streets: Policy Framework Complete Streets: Implementation Plans A more Complete Street: Laurier Bike Lane Pilot Project

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Elmhurst Metra Station. Public Hearing Wednesday - November 30, 2016

APPENDIX D: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES

Transcription:

Next Steps Decision on North Waterloo Routing Two route variations remain in north Waterloo. The final preferred route will include only one of the two variations. Please consider these two variations and include your comments on the Comment Sheet provided. Waterloo Rail Spurline Pros Generates 15% more ridership because of projected employment Stations at Northfield/ Parkside Drive and Research+Technology Park will serve employment-based ridership Trip time is two minutes faster UW station can be more centrally located on campus and this station location will integrate well with local bus routes Less impact to the road network Cons Does not serve WLU campus well, making shuttle service necessary Limited residential or affordable housing along spurline Property required to create space for both LRT and freight rail in the spur right-of-way Need agreement with CN and freight rail operator Slightly higher capital costs

Next Steps Decision on North Waterloo Routing King Street Pros Serves both UW and WLU as well as highdensity residential node at King/University Serves high number of residential and low income housing units Slightly lower capital costs Easier to build LRT on King Street now than in the future. Spurline can easily be held for future rapid transit development Cons Does not serve Research +Technology Park well, making shuttle service necessary UW station is located on University Avenue, with limited space for buses to stop and connect Rapid transit in the centre of King Street between Weber and Hickory Streets will reduce property access aggravating congestion in an already busy commercial/high density residential corridor Longer trip time (about 2 minutes) due to traffic signals along King Street and University Avenue

Next Steps GRT Redesign A preliminary concept has been completed for a redesign of the current Grand River Transit (GRT) network to integrate it with the Rapid Transit system High demand transit corridors have been identified that will bring riders from outside the Central Transit Corridor to the rapid transit system and provide seamless transit service across the region Changes to the current GRT network will be implemented to coincide with the start of rapid transit service This conceptual map shows what the new GRT network might look like:

New Transit EA Process and Project Funding Pending Regional Council approval of a preferred rapid transit system, the project will transition into the new environmental assessment (EA) process for transit projects. The new transit EA: Became effective in June 2008 Is based on a six-month regulated timeline from notice of commencement to completion Limits assessment of impacts to those of Provincial significance Is intended to streamline approvals for transit infrastructure improvements in Ontario. New transit initiatives can be constructed faster so the benefits to communities, the environment and the economy can be achieved sooner Project funding is anticipated from three levels of government: Region of Waterloo Province of Ontario Federal Government

Next Steps Project Implementation Summer 2009 June 5, 2009 Comment Sheets due June 10, 2009 Special Regional Council Meeting (to hear delegations about rapid transit) June 24, 2009 Regional Council Meeting (Council considers Recommended Rapid Transit option) Summer - Fall 2009 Regulatory Approvals Transition to New EA Transit Regulations Conduct Public Consultation Submit required documentation December 2009 Complete EA 2010-2011 Design and procurement 2012-2014 Construction 2014 Operation

What Do YOU Think? Add your voice to the discussion The Rapid Transit Project Team would like to hear your comments on the preferred Rapid Transit System and the Staging Option. Submit your comments before June 5, 2009 by: Visiting the project website www.region.waterloo.on.ca/rapidtransit and filling in our online comment form Via e-mail at rtinfo@region.waterloo.on.ca Using the Public Comment Sheet and placing it in the Comment Box today Taking the Public Comment Sheet home and mailing or faxing it to the address listed If you wish, register as a delegation for the June 10, 2009 Public Meeting with Regional Council. Region of Waterloo Rapid Transit Initiative 150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor Kitchener, ON N2G 4J3 Phone: 519-575-4757 ext. 3242 Fax: 519-575-4449 rtinfo@region.waterloo.on.ca

Engineering Considerations Some existing traffic lanes will be converted to rapid transit lanes. This would result in changes to traffic patterns, may reduce on-street parking, number of traffic lanes, left turn access, movements into driveways, and traffic safety. Changes around rapid transit stations i.e. intensification Noise / vibration Consider alternate traffic routes and parking locations, allow right-in/ right-out turns, U-turns and implement signal priority and provide effective signage. Develop station area plans to guide change improved pedestrian and cycling facilities, more amenities (shopping, entertainment, services) Noise increase will be less than 5 decibels BRT current bus standards dictate low noise LRT consider rubber dampening for rails and lubrication at curves Disruption during construction (similar to road reconstruction) Environmental considerations i.e. parks, conservation reserves and protected areas; endangered species, fish and their habitats; culturally significant properties; etc. Accessibility for passengers Planning to minimize disruption maintain emergency service access, block-by-block construction to minimize disruption and detours Take measures to have less impact on the environment Low floor vehicles, level with platforms

How We Determined Route Details Cross-sections were prepared for two-, four-, and six-lane roads Considered available utilities information and agency/stakeholder input (e.g. CN/CP, MTO, Cities) Considered traffic impacts, particularly in the downtown areas Principles include: Minimize property acquisition and impact on driveway access Minimize changes to signalized intersections, including impacts to turning lanes, where possible For off-road routes (railway corridors and Hydro corridor) minimize cross-over and separation between heavy rail and Rapid Transit maintain minimum clearances to Hydro towers For on-road routes (arterials and highways) where road right-of-way is wide enough, use centre median lanes where road right-of-way is narrow, consider curb lanes, boulevard, one-way system, parallel roads for Hwy 8 and 401 Adapted Bus Rapid Transit routes use bus by-pass shoulders for exclusive bus use to maintain Rapid Transit speeds

Rapid Transit in Core Areas Northbound and southbound dedicated rapid transit lanes are located on different streets in both Uptown Waterloo and downtown Kitchener. One dedicated rapid transit lane on each street minimizes impacts to property, parking, utilities, and traffic. For the future LRT system in downtown Cambridge, a single dedicated transit lane south of Parkhill Road will be used for operation in both directions. In all three core areas, dedicated rapid transit lanes are located along the curb, with station platforms on the sidewalk. Uptown Waterloo Downtown Kitchener Downtown Cambridge