APPENDIXB. Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum

Similar documents
Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

MEMORANDUM. Trip Generation and Distribution. CyRide / ISU Intermodal Facility Steering Committee. Date: August 31, 2009

APPENDIX F SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC DATA

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

5.3 TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION AND PARKING

CarMax Auto Superstore/ Reconditioning Center #6002 Murrieta, California

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

Lyons Avenue/Dockweiler Road Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. Appendix I Traffic Impact Study

Road Conversion Study Plumas Street

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Project Report. South Kirkwood Road Traffic Study. Meadows Place, TX October 9, 2015

Abrams Associates. Transportation Impact Analysis. City of Rocklin. Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

Los Coyotes Country Club Development Plan Traffic Impact Analysis

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FINAL Albertville Business Park AUAR Update Traffic Study

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

CHAPTER THREE MOBILITY

APPENDIX A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Chapter 16: Traffic and Parking A. INTRODUCTION

7.0 FREEWAYS CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM & IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS & DEFINITION

3.9 - Transportation and Traffic

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

Introduction Roundabouts are an increasingly popular alternative to traffic signals for intersection control in the United States. Roundabouts have a

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...


MEMORANDUM. To: 1.0 PURPOSE

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

MEMORANDUM. Our project study area included the following locations:

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Memorandum Pershing Road Suite 400 Kansas City, MO Tel Fax

Roadway Impact Fee Program Update

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis. Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. May 23, 2018

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Corridor Studies. LA 415 and LA 73

INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road

EAST AND SOUTH STREET CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA

#!! "$% ##! &! # '#! % $ #!

US 81 CORRIDOR STUDY FROM NORTH OF UNION CITY SOUTH TO SH 19 SOUTH OF CHICKASHA CANADIAN AND GRADY COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA JULY 2007

D.13 Transportation and Traffic

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS REPORT. Pacheco Boulevard Alignment Study and Alternatives Analysis

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

NO BUILD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

AMEC Earth and Environmental. Bovaird Drive Environmental Assessment. Traffic Study Final Report. August Excellence in Transportation Planning

DIMARCO CANANDAIGUA PROPERTIES HOUSING PROJECT CANANDAIGUA, ONTARIO COUNTY, NEW YORK

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Route 7 Corridor Study

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

4.11 TRANSPORTATION 4.11 TRANSPORTATION Environmental Setting Intersection, Roadway, and Freeway Evaluation Methodology

T R A N S P O R T A T I O N M E M O R A N D U M

USA Parkway Traffic Operations Analysis, Roundabout Option. Pedro Rodriguez, NDOT; Bryan Gant, Jacobs; Randy Travis, NDOT

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA

91

Technical Memo. Steve Gramm, SDDOT. RE: Phase 1, Task 100: Baseline Analysis. To: From: Steve Hoff, HDR Engineering, Inc.

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

Transcription:

APPENDIXB Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum Environmental Assessment - Lincoln County, SD 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Louise Avenue November 2017

MEMORANDUM Transportation Jim Kollbaum, PE 12120 Shamrock Plaza Suite 300 Omaha, NE 68154 (402) 334-8181 (402) 334-1984 (Fax) To: Project File Date: February 27, 2013 (Revised November 21, 2016) Subject: 85 th Street Traffic Analysis Introduction This technical memorandum documents the findings of a traffic analysis for proposed improvements for the 85 th Street corridor between Sundowner Avenue and Louise Avenue. As part of the proposed action, 85 th Street will be extended across I-29 and the roadway widened to a four lane arterial with left-turn lanes. This traffic analysis report documents the evaluation of existing traffic conditions and the no build and build future year (2038) traffic conditions. The future year was set as 2038 based on proposed 85 th Street construction in 2018. The objective of the no build alternative analysis is to define the expected traffic operational characteristics of the current arterial roadway system within the project study area. The build alternative analysis documents the traffic operations with the expansion and extension of 85 th Street. The analysis consists of a traffic operations analysis of the arterial intersections within the project study area. The remainder of this document contains a discussion of the following: Study Area Roadways Planned Roadway Improvements Traffic Operations Analyses Methodologies Existing and Future Year Condition Traffic Volumes Findings of the Existing (2013) Conditions Traffic Analyses Findings of the Future Year (2038) No Build and Build Conditions Traffic Analyses Study Area Roadways A description of the key arterial roadways within the study is provided below: Solberg Avenue is currently a four-lane divided arterial roadway between 57th and approximately 72 nd Street. Traffic signal control is provided for the intersections with

Memorandum Page 2 57th and 69 th Street. Louise Avenue is currently a four- or five-lane divided arterial roadway between 57th and 85 th Street. Louise Avenue has two lanes between 85 th Street and CR 106. Traffic signal control is provided for the Louise Avenue intersections with 57th Street, 59th Street, I-229 southbound ramp, I-229 northbound ramp, 69th Street, 77 th Street and 85 th Street. Tallgrass Avenue is currently a two-lane dirt/gravel roadway between 72 nd Street and CR 106. North of 72 nd Street the cross section is a four-lane paved arterial roadway. Sundowner Avenue is currently a two-lane dirt/gravel roadway between 67 th Street and CR 106. Between 57 th Street and 67 th Street it is a two-lane paved roadway with additional width utilized for on-street parking. 57th Street is currently a four-lane divided arterial roadway between Marion Road and Louise Avenue. West of Marion Road, 57th Street has two-lanes plus a continuous twoway left-turn lane. 69th Street currently has a variety of cross sections and surface conditions. East of Louise Avenue, it is currently a four-lane divided arterial roadway. Between Louise Avenue and Connie Avenue (one block segment), a four-lane divided roadway is provided. Between Connie Avenue to just west of Sharon Avenue, 69th Street has twolanes plus a continuous two-way left-turn lane. Between Sharon Avenue and Medical Court West (western access point to Avera Health Center), 69th Street is currently a twolane undivided roadway. Between Medical Court West and Solberg Avenue / Tallgrass Avenue, 69th Street is currently a four lane divided roadway. All intersections along 69th Street between Louise Avenue and Tallgrass Avenue utilize stop sign control with 69th Street as the free-flow movement. 85 th Street is currently a two-lane gravel roadway between Sundowner Avenue and I-29 (2,375 ) and between I-29 and Townsley Street (2,550 ). Between Townsley Street and Louise Avenue (3,950 ), 85 th Street is two-lane paved roadway. The gap at I-29 where 85 th Street does not exist is approximately 1,320 in length. All intersections along 85th Street utilize stop sign control with 85th Street as the free-flow movement, except for the intersections of Tallgrass and Sundowner Avenue where the north/south traffic movements are free-flowing. The roadway and intersection geometrics were primarily derived from aerial photography and GIS data provided by the City of Sioux Falls and supplemented through fieldwork. Traffic signal timings were also obtained from the City of Sioux Falls. Planned Future Roadway Improvements In the vicinity of this study area and southwest Sioux Falls, there are a number of additional transportation improvement projects. These projects are listed below and were identified in the following documents:

Memorandum Page 3 SDDOT Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 2017-2020 Sioux Falls MPO 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program Sioux Falls 2017-2021 Capital Program Go Sioux Falls 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan (Sioux Falls 2015a). Each project listing also includes a project number, reference number, or planning horizon year, shown in parenthesis, as listed in these planning documents. SDDOT Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 2017-2020 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Tallgrass Avenue (P 1360(01)) Sioux Falls MPO 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Tallgrass Avenue (P 1360(01)) 85 th Street / I-29 Grade Separation (11017) 85 th Street: Louise Avenue to Sundowner Avenue (11006) Tallgrass Avenue: 69 th Street to 85 th Street (11006) Sundowner Avenue: 69 th Street to 85 th Street (11006) Sioux Falls 2017-2021 Capital Programs 85 th Street: Louise Avenue to Sundowner Avenue (11006) Tallgrass Avenue: 69th Street to 85th Street (11006) 85 th Street / I-29 Grade Separation (11017) Sundowner Avenue: 67 th Street to 85 th Street (11006) 69 th Street: Tallgrass Avenue to Louise Avenue (11006) Go Sioux Falls 2040, Sioux Falls MPO Long-Range Transportation Plan 85 th Street: Louise Avenue to Sundowner Avenue (Funded / Committed) 85 th Street / I-29 Grade Separation (Funded / Committed) Sundowner Avenue: 67 th Street to 85 th Street (Funded / Committed) Tallgrass Avenue: 69 th Street to 85 th Street (Funded / Committed) 271 st Street: Heritage Avenue to 0.2 Miles East of Sundowner Avenue (Funded / Committed) 85 th Street: Ellis Road to Sundowner Avenue (2021-2025) 69 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Solberg Avenue I-29 Grade Separation Structure (2021-2025) Sundowner Avenue: 85th Street to 271 st Street (2021-2025) 85 th Street: Louise Avenue to Audie Avenue (2026-2030)

Memorandum Page 4 Sundowner Avenue: 57 th Street to 67 th Street (2026-2030) 69 th Street: Solberg Avenue to 0.5 Mile East (2026-2030) Louise Avenue: 93 rd Street to Co. 106 (2026-2030) Tallgrass Avenue: 85 th Street to Co. 106 (2031-2035) 69 th Street: Tea-Ellis Road to Sundowner Avenue (2036-2040) SD 100: I-29 to Louise Avenue (beyond 2040) Traffic Operations Analyses Methodologies The evaluation of existing and future traffic conditions for the study area roadways consisted of traffic operations analyses for the arterial street system. A brief summary of the analysis methodologies is provided below. Traffic capacity and level of service determinations for study area intersections were also made based on the theory and methodologies contained in the HCM. These procedures and methodologies were facilitated using the Synchro traffic analysis program. For the purposes of this study, a deficiency is defined as LOS E or worse. At signalized intersections, level of service is based on the weighted average of all approach delays. For unsignalized intersections, the LOS is based on the worst minor street movement delay (usually the left turn movements on the cross street). Table 1 provides the LOS criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. TABLE 1: LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR INTERSECTIONS Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) Level of Service Signalized Unsignalized Description A 10 10 Free flow, minimal delays B 10 and 20 10 and 15 Stable flow, occasional delays C 20 and 35 15 and 25 Stable flow, periodic delays D 35 and 55 25 and 35 Restricted flow, regular delays E 55 and 80 35 and 50 Maximum capacity, extended delays F 80 50 Forced flow, excessive delays Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board Signalized LOS Criteria taken from HCM Chapter 18; Unsignalized LOS Criteria taken from HCM Chapter 19 Existing and Future Year Condition Traffic Volumes Existing and future year condition traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are provided in Figure 1. The future year (2038) figure includes traffic volumes for both the no-build and

Memorandum Page 5 build conditions. These traffic volumes were derived from the following data sources: Intersection turn movement counts were provided by the City of Sioux Falls. Freeway ramp counts that included hourly and daily volumes were conducted by the SDDOT for the I-29 / I-229 interchange. 2035 Sioux Falls MPO Regional Travel Model, base calibrated model. Average daily traffic (ADT) was obtained from three sources listed below: o Traffic Volumes Counts for the City of Sioux Falls o South Dakota Traffic Flow Map produced by the SDDOT o A spreadsheet of roadway link volumes provided by the SDDOT The intersection turn movement counts were collected over a number of years and at different times of the year. These factors result in traffic volume differences that were adjusted during a smoothing process in order to develop more consistent turn movement volumes between up and downstream intersections. The intersection turn movement counts at interchange ramp terminal intersections were also used to determine the interchange ramp volumes. The SDDOT ramp counts for the interchange of I-29 / I-229 provided the peak hour volumes for I-229 between the I-29 and Louise Avenue interchanges. Development of other peak hour freeway volumes required a conversion from daily traffic volumes. In urban areas, the percentage of daily traffic volume that occurs during a peak hour typically ranges from 8.0 to 10.0% on freeways. For a freeway like I-229 the peak hour percentage may be a little higher because there are less through vehicles using this facility as opposed to I-90 and I-29. All of these factors were used to develop smoothed traffic volumes for the freeway facilities. Findings of the Existing Conditions Traffic Analyses The results of the traffic operation analyses for existing (year 2013) conditions are shown on Figure 2 and the figure displays results for the arterial intersections within the project area. For current conditions there are a few of arterial intersections within the study area that exceed acceptable levels (minimum acceptable traffic operating conditions are LOS D). These intersections include: 57th Street / Sundowner Avenue (ante meridiem [AM] / post meridiem [PM] peaks) Louise Avenue / I-229 Southbound (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / Sundowner Avenue (AM / PM peaks)

Memorandum Page 6 Findings of the Future Year (2038) No Build and Build Conditions Traffic Analyses The traffic operations picture is anticipated to change considerably between the current conditions and the 2038 horizon year as traffic volumes in the 85th Street corridor are projected to grow considerably and the resulting volumes along 85th Street will range from 14,000 to 21,000 per day for the Build condition. Substantial traffic growth for 85th Street is also projected under the No-Build condition. The other arterial roadways in southwest Sioux Falls are also projected to see marked increases in traffic volumes between current conditions and the 2038 horizon year. For the Interstate system, the forecasted 2038 traffic in the I-29 and I-229 corridors are projected to be approximately double current volumes. Without capacity enhancing improvements, congestion in the morning and afternoon peak hours is expected to increase substantially from current conditions for most of the arterial roadways within southwest Sioux Falls. Figures 3 and 4 displays the 2038 no-build and build arterial intersection operations, respectively, within the study area in southwest Sioux Falls. For the purposes of this analysis, a deficiency is defined as LOS E or worse. Applying the LOS D minimum operations threshold, a number of arterial intersections within the study area and southwest Sioux Falls do not meet acceptable congestion levels under the future year nobuild conditions, see Figure 3. These intersections include: 57th Street / Sundowner Avenue (AM / PM peaks) 57th Street / Marion Road (AM / PM peaks) 57th Street / Solberg Avenue (AM / PM peaks) 57th Street / Louise Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Louise Avenue / I-229 Southbound (AM / PM peaks) 69th Street / Louise Avenue (AM / PM peaks) 85th Street / Sundowner Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / Sundowner Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / I-29 (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / Tallgrass Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / Louise Avenue (AM / PM peaks) The findings of the future year (2038) no-build conditions traffic analyses show that a large portion of the arterial roadway intersections within the project area are projected to experience capacity deficiencies. Many of the signalized intersections with poor levels of service (LOS F) for are projected to significantly exceed the 80 second threshold established for LOS F operations. The 85 th Street and Sundowner Avenue intersection is projected to be LOS E/F under no-build conditions in part because the traffic control will be two-way stop-sign control under this scenario.

Memorandum Page 7 The future year (2038) build conditions are shown on Figure 4 and once again a number of intersections are projected to not meet the acceptable LOS threshold. Those intersections include: 57th Street / Sundowner Avenue (AM / PM peaks) 57th Street / Marion Road (AM / PM peaks) 57th Street / Solberg Avenue (AM / PM peaks) 57th Street / Louise Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Louise Avenue / I-229 Southbound (AM / PM peaks) 69th Street / Louise Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / Sundowner Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / I-29 (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / Tallgrass Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Highway 106 / Louise Avenue (AM / PM peaks) Under the future year build conditions there a number of intersections whose LOS do not appeared to be improved compared to the no-build conditions, however, many of these intersections do experience a reduction in traffic delay. This is especially true for the 57 th Street intersections.

Lincoln County 111 1,600 12,700 10,500 33,300 72,000 70,400 600 17,400 14,500 4,600 13,500 11,500 1,900 13,700 11,600 6,800 21,100 22,500 800 24,200 22,500 12,600 25,800 27,000 19,900 37,500 36,500 4,800 20,500 17,800 LEGEND 3,900 26,800 26,800-2013 Daily Traffic - 2038 No Build Daily Traffic - 2038 Build Daily Traffic Figure 1. Existing (2013) and Future Year (2038) Traffic Volumes

Lincoln County 111 LEGEND LOS A/B LOS C LOS D LOS E/F AM/PM Junction LOS Figure 2. Existing (2013) Intersection Traffic Operations Summary

Lincoln County 111 LEGEND LOS A/B LOS C LOS D LOS E/F AM/PM Junction LOS Figure 3. Future (2038) No-Build Scenario Traffic Operations Summary - Intersections

Lincoln County 111 LEGEND LOS A/B LOS C LOS D LOS E/F AM/PM Junction LOS Figure 4. Future (2038) Build Scenario Traffic Operations Summary - Intersections