Vermont Rail conversion/feasibility Study

Similar documents
South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Chapter 3 BUS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

6 Screen 3 Analysis and Results

Evaluation of Alternatives and Final Screening Results November 20 and 21, 2013

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities

West LRT Workshop Session Welcome Stony Plain Road from 149 Street to 124 Street May 12, 2010

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Sacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

San Jose Transportation Policy

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit: Staff-Recommended Alternative

Crenshaw Transit Corridor Study. Working Group Meetings March 2009

SH 68. Meeting with Affected Property Owners September 9, 2014

ADVANCED TRANSIT OPERATIONS AND MODELING

Wyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

MEETING Agenda. Introductions. Project Overview. Key Study Components. Alternative Station Concepts. Preferred Station Concept. Next Steps.

Light Rail Transit in North Central Calgary Open House and Workshop Summary. Summer 2013

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

Building Great Neighbourhoods BELLEVUE AND VIRGINIA PARK

Building Great Neighbourhoods LANSDOWNE

Major Bike Routes 102 Avenue Workshop April 21, 2015

Overview: Phase 3 Draft Development and Circulation Plans, White Bear Station

ALTERNATIVES SCREENING REPORT

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Moving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications

% of Sales Tax (net of Admin) First Year Amount. Metro State of Good Repair 2% $ 17 $ 350 $ 910 $ 1,140 $ 2,400

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Baseline Road Rapid Transit: Bayshore Station to Prince of Wales Drive

ACTION: SELECT PREFERRED LIGHT RAIL ALIGNMENT FOR PHASE 2 OF THE EXPOSITION CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

UNIVERSITY AVENUE CORRIDOR REDESIGN. January 8, 2017 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

Martha Coello, Fairfax County DOT Jeffrey Hermann, Fairfax County DOT Abi Lerner, VDOT. May 19, 2014

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

Community Engagement Process

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Advanced Transit Oriented Developments (ATODs) - Defined

Giles Run Connector Road

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

Kansas City Area Transportation Authority. Downtown Transit Improvement Vision 2/11/15

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

PROJECT OVERVIEW. Auburn Station Access Improvements Project

Appendix 1 Transit Network Analysis

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

Transportation Assessment

WELCOME BUS RAPID TRANSIT PUBLIC MEETING. MEETING TIME: 5 p.m. - 8 p.m.

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Building Great Neighbourhoods QUEEN ALEXANDRA

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

NorthRail Streetcar Study

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Non-Motorized Overpass at SR 5/US1

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

I-20 East Transit Initiative. Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting September 9, :00-6:00 PM

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 2. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 2 August 10, 2010

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

Alternatives Public Workshop

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Transcription:

Vermont Rail conversion/feasibility Study Stakeholder Meetings May 2018

Welcome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcg3cjutk80

Purpose of Tonight s Meeting > Provide a study overview > Solicit feedback and listen to your comments on: Proposed BRT options planned for Vermont Thoughts on future conversion to rail Other community improvements to consider

Measure M > November 2016 Approval of Measure M sales tax with 71.15% support Meet needs of increasing traffic congestion, air pollution and growth > Vermont BRT Measure M Project $425 M for Vermont BRT Anticipated BRT opening FY28 FY30 Potential rail conversion after 2067

Background > January/May 2016 Vermont BRT Stakeholder meetings > January 2017 Open house on initial findings Interest in rail expressed > March 2017 Board directed staff to: Proceed with BRT as near term improvement Study potential future rail alternatives

Corridor Overview > 12.4 miles > Second busiest bus corridor 45,000 daily boardings > Heavy traffic resulting in slow service/poor on-time performance > Connects to: Major rail and bus lines Key activity centers > Varying ROW widths (80-200 feet)

Project Goals/Objectives > Improve service performance Reduce passenger travel times Improve service reliability Increase ridership > Enhance customer experience Better passenger amenities Improve pedestrian/bicycle access > Invest in the community Improve mobility & livability

BRT A New Kind of Ride

Rail Conversion/Feasibility Study Approach Future Baseline Conditions 6 Preliminary Rail Concepts Refine BRT Concepts Analyze 3 Rail Concepts (Ridership, Conceptual Engineering, Grade Crossing/Junction Capacity, Phasing, Corridor Fit) Ridership Thresholds for Conversion Potential to Support Transit Oriented Communities Urban Design Concepts Final Report

Recap of Initial BRT Concepts > Identified 4 initial concepts > Two determined to be most promising Side Running BRT Side/Center Running BRT

Side Running BRT > Converts traffic lanes (adjacent to parking) to bus lanes > Loss of approximately 446 all-day parking spaces (22% of total parking) > Potential 36% increase in ridership > 27% improvement in travel time

Side/Center Running BRT > North of Gage - converts 8.2 miles of traffic lanes (adjacent to parking) to bus lanes > South of Gage - converts center traffic lanes to bus lanes (4.2 miles) > Loss of approximately 464 all-day parking spaces (23% of total parking) > Potential 36% increase in ridership > 28% improvement in travel time

BRT Considerations for Rail Conversion > Alignments Width of BRT lane Horizontal curves Vertical curves (e.g. grade seps) Vertical clearances > Stations/Platforms Ability to extend station platform Design to kit-of-parts

Initial Six Rail Concepts Considered > 2 Light Rail concepts center or side-running > 1 Tram/Streetcar concept at-grade side-running > 3 Heavy Rail concepts Connecting with Red Line Connecting with Purple Line Ending at Wilshire/Vermont High-Floor LRT Low-Floor LRT Tram/Streetcar Heavy Rail Transit

Concept 1: Light Rail > Center Running > High Floor > Vertical alignment At-grade south of Gage Av TBD north of Gage Av Grade separation at Expo/Vermont

Concepts 2 and 3: Light Rail & Streetcar > Light Rail Side-Running Low Floor Primarily at-grade > Tram/Streetcar Side-Running At-grade

Concept 4: Heavy Rail > Connect with Purple Line for south/west alignment

Concept 5: Heavy Rail > Connect with Red Line to create north/south line

Concept 6: Heavy Rail > Terminate at Wilshire/Vermont > Facilitate transfers to Red or Purple Line

Evaluation Screening Criteria > Customer experience > System connectivity > System operability and reliability > Passenger capacity > Cost > Construction impacts and service disruption

What is TOC? > Focus on integrating transportation and land use planning in support of livable communities that are compact, dense, mixed-use, walkable, engaging and resilient.

Components of TOC Land Use Mix Sustainability Urban Density Sense of Place Health Benefits Mobility Choices

Next Steps > May 2018 Reduce to three rail concepts for more analysis > Refine BRT concepts > October 2018 Return to discuss study findings > December 2018 Complete Study > Mid 2019 Begin environmental review of Vermont BRT

Contact Lilian De Loza-Gutierrez Community Relations Manager 213.922.7479 vermontbrt@metro.net www.metro.net/projects/vermont-corridor

Thank You