Jul y 18, L D C I t e m #8 S U M M A R Y. Overview. Existing Code Shortcomings

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Jul y 18, L D C I t e m #8 S U M M A R Y. Overview. Existing Code Shortcomings"

Transcription

1 Jul y 18, 2017 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board L D C I t e m #8 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE P LAN LDC REVISION S U M M A R Y Owner N/A Applicant City of Orlando Project Planner John Rhoades Citywide Applicant s Request: Land Development Code Amendment Chapter 61, Part 2B Assigns the functional classification, access classification, and required right-of-way width for all streets within the city limits. These sections of the LDC have not been updated since the early 1990 s and many current streets are not included on the existing listing. The functional classification and access management systems are also being updated to provide simplification and clarity for citizens, developers, and staff. Staff s Recommendation: Approval of the request, subject to the conditions in this report. Public Comment Staff posted this item on the City s website, and placed a classified ad in the Orlando Sentinel. No public comments have been received as of the date of the Staff Report. Updated: June 26, 2017 Project Analysis Overview Chapter 61, Part 2B establishes both the City s functional classification system and the City s access management system for streets. The former is required to meet Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines for potential funding mechanisms. The latter is required per the Growth Management Plan. Part 2B also assigns functional and access classifications to all streets within the City and establishes the right-of-way width that is expected to be needed for future roadway expansions and reconfigurations. Existing Code Shortcomings The language and list of streets in existing Code is often unclear, has relics of streets types no longer used within the City, and has not been updated in more than two decades to match the network growth that has occurred in large portions of Orlando. The existing functional classification system does not adequately take into account the context of the surrounding land uses and neighborhoods. The existing access management system includes street types that do not exist in Orlando and that no longer reflect good urban design and transportation principals and practices.

2 Page 2 LDC M ajor T horoughfare Plan Changes Addressed The proposed functional classification system assigns a context to streets along with a functional classification to allow the City to meet the FHWA guidelines for classification while providing improved flexibility to plan streets that match the needs of the varied neighborhoods those streets serve. The proposed access management system removes several street types that are no longer envisioned to be used in Orlando. It also will be easier for citizens and the development community to determine directly from the Code where driveways will be allowed and what type of median access they can expect for a given parcel. The proposed listing of streets will include the many miles of streets that did not exist in the early 1990 s and that are now a part of Orlando through annexation or growth. Proposed rights-of-way will now include space for enhanced streetscape elements that the City currently considers essential for development of a true multi-modal transportation system. Such a system is needed to improve mobility for citizens and to create the high livability neighborhoods that the City considers vital to sustained and positive urban growth. A clarification of how the Major Thoroughfare Plan can be amended in the further to handle new streets coming into the network is also included in the revised text. The figure intended to help readers identify how separation of driveways and intersections is measured has been simplified and updated. The possible future street cross sections that could be used on any future street segment have been moved out of the Code and will be published in separate guideline document. This will allow for greater flexibility in applying the specific cross section that is found to be most appropriate at the time when improvements are initiated. Findings In review of the proposed LDC amendment, it is found that: 1. The Proposed land Development Code amendment is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, Florida Statutes). 2. The proposed Land Development Code amendment is consistent with the East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan. 3. The proposed Land Development Code amendment is consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. 4. The proposed Land Development Code amendment is consistent with the objectives and policies of the City s adopted Growth Management Plan (GMP). Recommendations Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments to Chapter 61, part 2B of the Orlando Land Development Code, and also recommend that the municipal planning board find that the amendment is consistent with City s adopted Growth Management Plan.

3 Page 3 LDC M ajor T horoughfare Plan Existing Code Chapter 61, Part 2B 2B. - MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN Sec Enumeration. The following street center line setbacks have been established to accommodate changes which should occur within the City of Orlando generally as a result of the increase of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, congestion and intensified use of property associated with growth and development and based upon Transportation Planning Bureau Technical Report #8, Plan Recommendations October Street center line setbacks are established by the Transportation Planning Bureau within the limits of the right-ofway for each street. In establishing such center lines the Transportation Planning Bureau shall give consideration to previous dedications, established section lines and logical street alignments. The center line setbacks and typical cross sections apply to both sides of the streets unless otherwise specified. All segments of the Major Thoroughfare Plan have been assigned an access classification consistent with the standards of Section (Ord. of , Doc. #25098) Sec Access Management Classification System. This section adopts an access classification system and standards to implement the Traffic Circulation Element of the Growth Management Plan for the regulation and control of vehicular ingress to, and egress from the Major Thoroughfare System. The implementation of the classification system and standards is intended to protect public safety and general welfare, provide for the mobility of people and goods, and preserve the function integrity of the Major Thoroughfare System. All segments of the Major Thoroughfare System shall be assigned an access classification and standards. The standards shall be the basis for connection permitting and the planning and development of City-related road construction projects. (Ord. of , Doc. #25098) Sec Standards for the Access Management System. (a) Figure 1 provides the classification system and standards for each major thoroughfare within the City. Access classes are defined as follows. (b) Access Class 2. These are highly controlled facilities distinguished by the ability to serve high speed and high volume traffic over long distances in a safe and efficient manner. These facilities also are distinguished by a system of existing or planned frontage roads. This access class is characterized by a highly controlled limited number of connections, median openings, and infrequent traffic signals. (c) Access Class 3. These facilities are controlled access roads where direct access to abutting land will be controlled to maximize the operation of the through traffic movement. This class will be used where existing land use and roadway sections have not completely built out to the maximum land use or roadway capacity or where the probability of significant land use change in the near future is high. These facilities will be distinguished by existing or planned restrictive medians and maximum distance between traffic signals and driveway connections. (d) Access Class 4. These facilities are controlled access roads where direct access to abutting land will be controlled to maximize the operation of the through movement. This class will be used where existing land use and roadway sections have not completely built out to the maximum land use or roadway capacity or where the probability of significant land use change in the near future is high. These facilities are distinguished by existing or planned nonrestrictive median treatments. (e) Access Class 5. This class will be used where existing land use and roadway sections have been built out to a greater extent than those roadway segments classified as Access Classes 3 and 4 and where the probability of major land use change is not as high as those roadway segments classified Access Classes 3 and 4. This access class also will be used to classify collectors. These facilities will be distinguished by existing or planned restrictive medians. (f) Access Class 6. This class will be used where existing land use and roadway sections have been built out to a greater extent than those roadway segments classified as Access Classes 3 and 4 and where the probability of major land use change is not as high as those roadway segments classified Access Classes 3 and 4. This access class also will be used to classify collectors. These facilities will be distinguished by existing or planned nonrestricted medians or centers.

4 Page 4 LDC M ajor T horoughfare Plan (g) Access Class 7. This class shall be used where existing roadway sections and existing land uses are built out to the maximum feasible intensity and where significant road widening will be limited. This class will be assigned to facilities with high speed travel difficulties. These facilities can have either restrictive or non-restrictive medians. (h) Access Class 8. This class shall only be used in the zoning district AC-3A (Downtown Orlando), where the existing roadway sections are built out to the maximum feasible and other modes of transportation are encouraged. this class also recognizes the difficulty of providing high speed travel but shall not be used to compromise the public health, welfare or safety. (i) Connection permits on every facility segment on the Major Thoroughfare Plan issued after adoption of this amendment shall meet the requirements of this section. (Ord. of , Doc. #25098) Sec Other Access Management Standards Considerations Existing Properties. (a) At the time of adoption of this amendment by City Council, existing permitted connections, median openings, and signals not meeting the standards of the assigned classification shall be allowed to remain in place. Such features shall be brought into compliance with the standards of the assigned classification in the Major Thoroughfare Plan under the following conditions: (1) when new connection permits are needed; (2) when changes in existing property use which increase land use intensity on the site; (3) substantial enlargements or improvements; (4) significant change in trip generation according to the most recent trip generation manual or independent fee calculation; or (5) as changes to the roadway design allow. (b) A development site that cannot meet the minimum connection spacing standards of Figure 1 on a particular segment of the adjacent roadway shall at least comply with the minimum connection standard depicted in Figure 2 and 2-A. These conditions may limit access to a specific use, prohibit an increase in intensity as outlined in Chapter 58, Part 1, Table 3, Land Use Intensity Table, and require joint use driveways and cross-access easements. Redevelopment sites which qualify for these exceptions shall not have site frontage greater than 660 feet under single ownership. (c) Due to inadequate lot frontage, location of existing driveways on abutting properties or other similar physical constraints, a development site may not meet the minimum spacing requirements. A development site that cannot be permitted access and has no reasonable alternative means of access to the public road system shall be issued approval for a non-conforming connection by the Public Works Director with conditions specified in Section (b). (d) The minimum connection and median opening spacings specified in this section (Figures 1, 2 and 2-A Access Management Classification System) may be waived if the Public Works Director requires auxiliary lanes or storage lanes. Greater distances between connections and median openings shall be required by the City to provide sufficient site-specific turn lane storage, or to further the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan, based on health, safety, or welfare issues. (e) Where a development site is composed of more than one building site, the building sites shall not be considered as separate properties for the purpose of the standards associated with the access class of the roadway segment. Such sites with frontage exceeding the minimum standards of the assigned access class may not be permitted automatically the maximum number of connections, median openings, or signals possible based on the spacing standards. The number of connections permitted shall be the minimum number necessary to provide reasonable access based on operational, safety and functional integrity considerations. (f) Development sites and building sites directly abutting roadways where corridor studies adopted by City Council shall comply with the access management standards contained in such studies. (g) The speed referred to in Figures 1, 2 and 2-A shall indicate the speed limit posted for the roadway segment at the time of the access class designation. When a change in posted speed limit on a segment is approved by the pertaining authority (the City of Orlando, Orange County or Florida department of Transportation), the access class designation shall be updated and appropriately applied. (h) New connections shall not be located within the functional area of an existing intersection. Corner clearances for connections must meet or exceed the minimum connection spacing requirements for the assigned access class. A single connection may be placed closer to the intersection if corner clearance standards cannot be met to provide

5 Page 5 5 LDC Major 0 M ajor Thoroughfare T horoughfare Plan Revision Plan (i) reasonable access to the property. Approval of a connection may be provided upon review of a study performed by a registered engineer provided by the applicant. The Planning Official and the Public Works Director shall determine that the connection does not create a safety or operational problem on the roadway or at the intersection. Traffic signals meeting signal warrants may be spaced at intervals closer than the minimum standard for the access class for the roadway segment when the Public Works Director determines that the addition of such signals is needed for the safety and operation of the roadway based on a detailed engineering study performed by a registered engineer and subject to review by the Planning Official. (Ord. of , Doc. #25098; Ord. of , Doc. #26770) Sec Variance. The City may, upon request of the property owner or on its own initiative, allow a variance to the right-of-way setback from street centerline requirements contained within Chapter 61. The determination as to a variance under this Section shall be made by the Bureau Chief of Transportation Planning, the Zoning Official, and a representative of the Office of Legal Affairs. A variance may be granted if justice and fairness so require. Some factors to be considered, though not exclusive, are the following: 1. A Planning, Development & Engineering study which is inconsistent with the right-of-way setback requirements in Chapter Whether the public health, safety, and welfare would be compromised by the granting of a variance. 3. Whether the City's actual requirements for right-of-way are inconsistent with the general requirements under Chapter 61. (Ord. of , Doc. #25098; Ord. of , Doc. #27409)

6 Page 6 6 LDC Major 0 M ajor Thoroughfare T horoughfare Plan Revision Plan Amended Code Chapter 61, Part 2B Sec Enumeration. The street right of way widths listed in Table 3 below have been established to accommodate changes which should occur within the City of Orlando generally as a result of the increase of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, congestion and intensified use of property associated with growth and development. Right of way widths and centerlines are established by the Transportation Department. In establishing such rights of way the City staff shall give consideration to previous dedications, established section lines and logical street alignments. The right of way widths in this Chapter are measured from the center line of the overall right of way. These widths apply to both sides of the streets unless otherwise specified. All public or private streets within the City of Orlando city limits that are not listed in Table 3 are designated as Local Streets. Cross sections that will be used on a particular roadway segment will be determined to meet needs and policies in place at the time of redevelopment. Typical cross sections that may be used for the various types of roadways in specific contexts can be found in the City s Guideline for Street Cross Sections maintained by the Transportation Planning Division. Modifications to the designation of new or existing roadways as arterial, collector, or local will be initiated by the City Transportation Official and completed via an amendment to Table 3. All segments of the Major Thoroughfare Plan have been assigned an access classification consistent with the standards of Section (Ord. of , Doc. #25098) Sec Access Management Classification System. This section adopts an access classification system and standards to implement the Traffic Circulation Element of the Growth Management Plan for the regulation and control of vehicular ingress to, and egress from the Major Thoroughfare System. The implementation of the classification system and standards is intended to protect public safety and general welfare, provide for the mobility of people and goods, and preserve the functional integrity of the Major Thoroughfare System. All segments of the Major Thoroughfare System shall be assigned an access classification and standards. The standards shall provide planning and design guidance for driveway connections and be the basis for the planning and development of City-related street construction projects. (Ord. of , Doc. #25098)

7 Page 7 LDC M ajor T horoughfare Plan Rev ision Sec Standards for the Access Management System. For facilities in the Major Thoroughfare System, the Access Classification shall be based on the roadways primary role in the overall network and by the nature of the abutting land uses as described in the following: Classification A: These facilities are controlled access roads where direct access to abutting land will be controlled to maximize the operation of the through traffic movement. These facilities may include existing or planned restrictive medians, shared left turn lanes, or be undivided. The Access Classification is intended to provide maximum separation between traffic signals and driveway connections. Arterial roadways abutting large land parcels and lying outside the Traditional City overlay district or similarly developed neighborhoods shall be classified as A. Classification B: These facilities serve a greater role in bringing traffic into the main streams of mobility and are allowed to provide less restrictive access than that permitted for Access Class A. Connection separation is less than that required for A, but is still sufficiently controlled to create a safe environment for vehicular and other mobility modes. This Classification applies to both arterial and collector roadways that lie outside the Traditional City overlay district and similarly developed neighborhoods and that generally abut smaller land parcels. Classification C: As these roadways are typically abutted by the most compact land parcels and have generally lower posted speed limits the control of access is the least restrictive. Driveway and intersection connections are allowed with the least separation for any facilities in the Major Thoroughfare System. All segments of the Major Thoroughfare plan that are within Core areas, those segments within predominately residential areas, and those segments designated as Urban Collectors shall be given the Access Classification of C. Separation requirements for each Access Management Classification are given in Figure 1 and Figure 2 below. All separation distances shall be measured at the outermost limit of the right-of-way between the nearest two paved edges of driveways or the back of curb of roadways (see Figure 2a). Connection permits on every facility segment on the Major Thoroughfare System issued after adoption of this amendment shall meet the requirements of this section. (Ord. of , Doc. #25098)

8 Page 8 LDC M ajor T horoughfare Plan Rev ision Sec Other Access Management Standards Considerations Existing Properties. (a) At the time of adoption of this amendment by City Council, existing permitted connections, median openings, and signals not meeting the standards of the assigned classification shall be allowed to remain in place. Such features shall be brought into compliance with the standards of the assigned classification in the Major Thoroughfare Plan under the following conditions: (1) when new connection permits are needed; (2) when existing property use changes to a land use with greater density or intensity on the site; (3) when substantial enlargements or improvements are proposed; (4) as changes to the roadway design allow. (b) A development site that cannot meet the minimum connection spacing standards on a particular segment of the adjacent roadway may be required to make use of shared access driveways and crossaccess corridors. These conditions may also limit access to a specific use or prohibit an increase in intensity as outlined in Chapter 58, Part 1, Table 3, Land Use Intensity Table. Redevelopment sites which qualify for variances from the separation distance requirements shall not have site frontage greater than 660 feet under single ownership. (c) Due to inadequate lot frontage, location of existing driveways on abutting properties or other similar physical constraints, a development site may not meet the minimum spacing requirements. A development site that cannot be permitted access and has no reasonable alternative means of access to the public road system shall be issued approval for a non-conforming connection by the City Transportation Engineer with conditions specified in Section (b). (d) The minimum connection and median opening separations specified in this section (Figures 1 and 2 Access Management Classification System) may be modified if the City Transportation Engineer approves the use and design of auxiliary lanes or storage lanes. Greater distances between connections and median openings may be required by the City to provide sufficient site-specific turn lane storage, or to further the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan, based on health, safety, or welfare issues. (e) Where a development site is composed of more than one building site, the building sites shall not be considered as separate properties for the purpose of the standards associated with the access class of the roadway segment. Such sites with frontage exceeding the minimum standards of the assigned access class may not be permitted automatically the maximum number of connections, median openings, or signals possible based on the spacing standards. The number of connections permitted shall be the minimum number necessary to provide reasonable access based on operational, safety and functional integrity considerations. (f) New connections shall not be located within the functional area of an existing intersection. A single driveway connection may be placed closer to the intersection than allowed in this section if separation standards cannot be met to provide reasonable access to the property. Approval of such a connection may be provided upon review of a study performed by a registered engineer provided by the applicant. The City Transportation Engineer shall determine that the connection does not create a safety or operational problem on the roadway or at the intersection prior to approval.

9 Page 9 LDC M ajor T horoughfare Plan Rev ision (g) Traffic signals meeting signal warrants may be spaced at intervals closer than the minimum standard for the access class for the roadway segment when the City Transportation Engineer determines that the addition of such signals is needed for the safety and operation of the roadway based on a detailed engineering study performed by a registered engineer. (h) Nothing in this Section shall preclude an intersection from undergoing a Signal Warrant Study, submitted by a registered engineer qualified to conduct such studies and approved by the City Transportation Engineer, prior to consideration of actual design and construction of traffic signals at a specific location on the Major Thoroughfare System. Satisfaction of warrants at an intersection does not require that a signal be installed. Final approval of the signal design and installation is at the discretion of the City Transportation Engineer. (Ord. of , Doc. #25098; Ord. of , Doc. #26770) Sec Variance. The City may, upon request of the property owner or on its own initiative, allow a variance to the right-of-way requirements contained within Chapter 61. The determination as to a variance under this Section shall be made by the City Transportation Official. A variance may be granted if justice and fairness so require. Some factors to be considered, though not exclusive, are the following: 1 A Planning, Development & Engineering study which is inconsistent with the right-of-way setback requirements in Chapter 61 2 Whether the public health, safety, and welfare would be compromised by the granting of a variance. 3 Whether the City's actual requirements for right-of-way are inconsistent with the general requirements under Chapter 61 (Ord. of , Doc. #25098; Ord. of , Doc. #27409) See attached amended versions of Figures 1, 2, 2A and 3.

10 Page Contact Information LDC Major 0 M ajor Thoroughfare T horoughfare Plan Revision Plan For questions regarding this LDC amendment, please contact: John Rhoades at or john.rhoades@cityoforlando.net Jason Burton at or jason.burton@cityoforlando.net, or Jeremy Crowe at or jeremy.crowe@cityoforlando.net Review/Approval Process Next Steps 1. MPB minutes scheduled for review and approval by City Council. 2. Forward to City Attorney s Office for Legal Review 3. 1st reading of the Ordinance 4. 2nd reading of the Ordinance

11 FIGURE 1 ACCESS MANAGEMENT: RAISED MEDIAN ROADWAYS - SPACING GUIDELINES Minimum Separation from Adjacent MINIMUM MEDIAN OPENING SEPARATION Access MINIMUM TRAFFIC Driveways OR Intersections Applicability Class SIGNAL SEPARATION * FULL ACCESS DIRECTIONAL RIGHT IN AND RIGHT IN OR OPENING ACCESS OPENING RIGHT OUT RIGHT OUT A Suburban Arterials 2,640 ft (1/2 mi) 2,640 ft (1/2 mi) 1,320 ft (1/4 mi) 330 ft 165 ft B Urban Arterials & Suburban Collectors 1,320 ft (1/4 mi) 1,320 ft (1/4 mi) 660 ft (1/8 mi) 165 ft 125 ft C All other Major Thoroughfares 1,320 ft (1/4 mi) 660 ft (1/8 mi) 330 ft (1/16 mi) 125 ft 125 ft All values in Figure 1 are for informational and planning purposes only. The actual location and spacing of all median openings and traffic signals shall be determined and approved by the City Transportation Official & City Transporation Engineer prior to permitting. Where applicable, such approvals will be coordinated with responsible FDOT. Orange County, & Central Florida Expressway Authority officials. All separation distances in Figure 1 shall be measured from the nearest edge of pavements, extended to the right-of-way limit (see Figure 2a). FIGURE 2 ACCESS MANAGEMENT: UNDIVIDED & PAINTED MEDIAN ROADWAYS - SPACING GUIDELINES Minimum Separation from Adjacent Driveways OR Intersections Access MINIMUM TRAFFIC Applicability FULL ACCESS RIGHT IN AND RIGHT IN OR Class SIGNAL SEPARATION * DRIVEWAY RIGHT OUT RIGHT OUT A Suburban Arterials 2,640 ft (1/2 mi) 660 ft 330 ft 165 ft B Urban Arterials & Suburban Collectors 1,320 ft (1/4 mi) ft 125 ft C All other Major Thoroughfares 1,320 ft (1/4 mi) 125 ft 125 ft 125 ft All values in Figure 2 are for informational and planning purposes only. The actual location and spacing of all median openings and traffic signals shall be determined and approved by the City Transportation Official & City Transporation Engineer prior to permitting. Separtion distances on roadways under FDOT or OC jurisdiction, shall also be required to meet minimum standards for the appropriate governing entity. All separation distances in Figure 2 shall be measured from the nearest edge of pavements, extended to the right-of-way limit (see Figure 2a).

12

13 Table 3 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM Complete Street Classification Roadway Segment S or W End N or E End Context Functional Class Access Class 4Th St 11Th Av Boggy Creek Rd Suburban-Com Collector B th St Binnacle Way Joyce Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Th St Armed Forces Reserve Dr Tradeport Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Adventure Way I-4 Hollywood Way Suburban-Com Collector B Alden Rd Highland Av Rollins St Urban Center Collector C Alden Rd Orange Av Highland Av Urban Center Collector C All American Bv Orange Blossom Tl Edgewater Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Amelia St Hughey Av Magnolia Av Urban Core Collector C Amelia St Orange Blossom Tl Hughey Av Urban Center Collector C Americana Bv John Young Py Texas Av Suburban-Com Arterial A Anderson St Delaney Av Lake Underhill Rd Urban Center Collector C Anderson St Rosalind Av Delaney Av Urban Core Collector C Anderson St Division Av Rosalind Av Urban Core Collector C Anderson St Orange Blossom Tl Division Av Urban General Collector C Andes Av Lake Underhill Rd Colonial Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Arnold Palmer Dr Robert Trent Jones Dr Kirkman Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Ashford Bv Conway Rd Dixie Belle Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Augusta National Dr Bent Pine Dr Hoffner Av Suburban-Com Collector B Augusta National Dr T.G. Lee Bv Bent Pine Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Bal Bay E/W Narcoossee Rd Econlockhatchee Tl Suburban-Com Collector B Baldwin Park St Lake Baldwin Ln Semoran Bv Urban Center Collector C Bennet Rd Fairgreen St Corrine Dr Urban Center Collector C Bent Pine Dr Semoran Bv Corporate Centre Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Binnacle Way Landsreet Rd Tradeport Dr Suburban-Res Collector C Bluestem St North Lake Py Loblolly Pine Cr Suburban-Com Collector B Boggy Creek Rd Osceola County Line Jetport Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Boone Av Anderson St South St Urban Core Collector C Boone Av Gore St Anderson St Urban Center Collector C Boone/Lucerne/Sligh Kaley St Gore St Urban Center Collector C Brengle Av Princeton St Bryn Mawr St Suburban-Com Collector B Briercliff Dr Delaney Av Fern Creek Av Urban General Collector C Bruton Bv L.B. Mcleod Rd Nimons St Suburban-Com Collector B Bruton Bv Nimons St Columbia St Suburban-Com Collector B Bryn Mawr St Brengle Av Eunice Av Suburban-Com Collector B Bumby Av Colonial Dr Corrine Dr Urban General Collector C Bumby Av Anderson St Colonial Dr Urban Center Collector C Bumby Av Michigan St Anderson St Urban General Collector C Total Required ROW (ft) ROW Required per Side (ft)

14 Table 3 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM Complete Street Classification Roadway Segment S or W End N or E End Context Functional Class Access Class C R Smith St Goldwyn Av John Young Py Urban Center Collector C Caravan Ct Grandnational Dr Major Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Carrier Dr International Dr Grandnational Dr Urban Core Collector C Carter St Kirkman Rd Pres Barack Obama Py Suburban-Com Collector B Central Bv Lake Av Crystal Lake Dr Urban Center Collector C Central Bv Hughey Av Lake Av Urban Core Collector C Central Bv Orange Blossom Tl Hughey Av Urban General Collector C Central Bv Tampa Av Orange Blossom Tl Urban General Collector C Chickasaw Tl Lake Melrose Dr Red Bay Dr Suburban-Res Collector C Chickasaw Tl Leevista Bv Lake Melrose Dr Suburban-Res Collector C Church St Magnolia Av Summerlin Av Urban Center Collector C Church St Orange Av Magnolia Av Urban Core Collector C Church St Garland Av Orange Av Urban Core Collector C Church St Hughey Av Garland Av Urban Core Collector C Church St John Young Py Hughey Av Urban Center Collector C Cinderlane Py Lake Orlando Py Orange Blossom Tl Suburban-Res Collector C Clapp-Simms-Duda Rd Narcoossee Rd Southeastern Oaks Dr Suburban-Res Collector C Clarcona - Ocoee Rd Pine Hills Rd Lee Ann Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Clay Av Orange Av Par St Urban General Collector C Coastline Dr Silver Star Rd Seaboard Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Colonial Dr Bumby Av Old Cheney Hwy. Urban Center Arterial B Colonial Dr Highland Av Bumby Av Urban Center Arterial B Colonial Dr Hughey Av Highland Av Urban Core Arterial C Colonial Dr Tampa Av/ Country Club Ln Hughey Av Urban Center Arterial B Colonial Dr Pine Hills Rd Tampa Av/ Country Club Ln Suburban-Com Arterial A Columbia St Division St Orange Av Urban Center Collector C Columbia St Ivey Ln John Young Py Suburban-Com Collector B Commander Dr Hoffner Av Pershing Av Suburban-Com Collector B Common Way Rd Lake Baldwin Ln Lower Park Rd Urban General Collector C Conroy Rd Millenia Bv John Young Py Suburban-Com Arterial A Conroy Rd Vineland Rd Millenia Bv Suburban-Com Arterial A Conroy Rd Pres Barack Obama Py Vineland Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Conroy Rd Kirkman Rd Pres Barack Obama Py Suburban-Com Arterial A Conroy Rd Turkey Lake Rd Kirkman Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Conway Gardens Rd Michigan St Curry Ford Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Conway Rd McCoy Rd Lake Underhill Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Corporate Centre Bv Leevista Bv Bent Pine Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Corrine Dr Bennet Rd Common Way Rd Urban Center Collector C Total Required ROW (ft) ROW Required per Side (ft)

15 Table 3 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM Complete Street Classification Roadway Segment S or W End N or E End Context Functional Class Access Class Corrine Dr Forest Av Bennet Rd Urban Center Collector C Crystal Lake Dr Anderson St Robinson St Urban Center Arterial B Crystal Lake Dr Tennessee Tl Anderson St Suburban-Res Collector C Curry Ford Rd Bumby Av Goldenrod Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Curry Ford Rd Fern Creek Av Bumby Av Urban General Collector C Daetwyler Dr Binnacle Way Boggy Creek Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Daetwyler Dr Landstreet Rd Jetport Dr Suburban-Res Collector C Delaney Av Michigan St Anderson St Urban General Collector C Delaney Av Pineloch Av Michigan St Urban Center Collector C Division Av Gore St Washington St Urban Core Collector C Division Av Anderson St Gore St Urban Center Arterial B Dixie Belle Dr Gatlin Av Curry Ford Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Dowden Rd Lake Nona (L) East City Limits Suburban-Com Arterial A Dowden Rd Boggy Creek Rd Armed Forces Reserve Dr Suburban-Com Collector B East Orlando Connection Dowden Rd Lee Vista Bv Suburban-Com Arterial A Econlockhatchee Tl Dowden Rd Trivoli Chase Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Edgewater Dr Forest City Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Edgewater Dr Lakeview St Dowd Rd Urban Center Arterial B Edgewater Dr Colonial Dr Lakeview St Urban General Collector C Eunice Av Bryn Mawr St Silver Star Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Fern Creek Av Central Bv Virginia Dr Urban General Collector C Fern Creek Av Michigan St Briercliff Dr Urban General Collector C Fern Creek Av Overlake Av Baxter Av Urban General Collector C Forbes Place North Frontage Rd Shadowridge Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Forest Av Virginia Dr Corrine Dr Urban Center Collector C Formosa Av New Hampshire St Stymie Dr Urban General Collector C Fredrica Dr Michigan St Curry Ford Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Garland Av Colonial Dr Orange Av Urban Core Collector C Garland Av South St Colonial Dr Urban Core Collector C Gaston Foster Rd Curry Ford Rd Lake Underhill Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Gatlin Av Dixie Belle Dr Commander Dr Suburban-Com Collector B General Reese Rd Corrine Dr Glenridge Way Urban Center Collector C Glenridge Way General Reese Av Lake Baldwin Ln Urban Center Collector C Goldenrod Rd Pershing Av Curry Ford Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Goldenrod Rd Heinzelman Bv Old Goldenrod Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Goldwyn Av Columbia St C R Smith St Urban Center Collector C Gore St Mills Av Primrose Dr Urban General Collector C Gore St Orange Av Delaney Av Urban Center Collector C Total Required ROW (ft) ROW Required per Side (ft)

16 Table 3 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM Complete Street Classification Roadway Segment S or W End N or E End Context Functional Class Access Class Gore St Orange Blossom Tl Orange Av Urban Center Arterial B Gore St Tampa Av Orange Blossom Tl Suburban-Com Arterial A Grandnational Dr Oak Ridge Rd Caravan Ct Suburban-Com Collector B Grandnational Dr Carrier Dr Oak Ridge Rd Urban Center Collector C Grant St Semoran Bv Raper Dairy Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Grant St Fredrica Dr Semoran Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Grant St Division Av Orange Av Urban Center Collector C Greenbrier Py Sand Lake Rd Carrier Dr Urban Center Collector C Hampton St South St Virginia Dr Urban General Collector C Hazeltine National Dr DRI Property Line Narcoossee Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Hazeltine National Dr Shadowridge Dr DRI Property Line Suburban-Com Collector B Heintzelman Rd South Access Rd Goldenrod Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Hiawassee Rd Mardell Ct Old Winter Garden Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Highland Av Marks St Orange Av Urban Center Collector C Highland Av Livingston St Marks St Urban General Collector C Hoffner Av Conway Rd Goldenrod Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Hollywood Way. Turkey Lake Rd Universal Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Hughey Av Church St Colonial Dr Urban Core Collector C Hughey Av South St Church St Urban Core Collector C Innovation Way South Moss Park Rd East City Limits Suburban-Com Arterial A International Dr Universal Bv Oakridge Rd Urban Core Arterial C International Dr Carrier Dr Universal Bv Urban Core Arterial C Ivey Ln Kirkland Bv Columbia St Suburban-Com Collector B Ivey Ln. Raleigh St/Columbia St Old Winter Garden Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Jake St Lake Baldwin Ln Lakemont Av Urban Center Collector C Jetport Dr Boggycreek Rd Tradeport Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A John Young Py Orange Blossom Tl Edgewater Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A John Young Py Shader Rd Orange Blossom Tl Suburban-Com Arterial A John Young Py Colonial Dr Shader Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A John Young Py Sand Lake Rd Colonial Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Judge Rd Conway Rd Shadowridge Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Judge Rd Datewyler Dr Conway Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Kaley St Orange Av Fern Creek Av Urban General Collector C Kaley St Parramore Av Orange Av Urban Center Arterial B Kirkman Rd Sand Lake Rd Old Winter Garden Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A L.B. Mcleod Rd John Young Py Rio Grande Av Suburban-Com Collector B L.B. Mcleod Rd Kirkman Rd John Young Py Suburban-Com Collector B Total Required ROW (ft) ROW Required per Side (ft)

17 Table 3 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM Complete Street Classification Roadway Segment S or W End N or E End Context Functional Class Access Class Lake Baldwin Ln Baldwin Park St Glenridge Way Urban Center Collector C Lake Baldwin Ln Colonial Dr Baldwin Park St Urban Center Collector C Lake Breeze Rd North Lake Orlando Py John Young Py Suburban-Com Collector B Lake Como Cr Bumby Av Bumby Av Urban General Collector C Lake Margaret Dr Conway Rd Semoran Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Lake Nona Bv Cent. Florida Greeneway Narcoossee Rd Urban Center Collector C Lake Nona Bv Medical City Dr Cent. Florida Greeneway Urban Center Collector C Lake Nona Bv Boggy Creek Rd Medical City Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Lake Nona Rd (E/W) Medical City Dr Lake Nona Rd (L) Suburban-Com Collector B Lake Nona Rd (L) Lake Nona Bv Dowden Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Lake Underhill Dr South St/Anderson St Cocos Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Lake Vilma Dr Westpointe Bv Steer Lake Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Lakemont Av Common Way Rd Glenridge Way Urban Center Collector C Lakeview St Edgewater Dr Ivanhoe Bv/ Legion Pl Urban General Collector C Landsreet Rd Boggy Creek Rd Binnacle Way Suburban-Com Collector B Landsreet Rd Orange Av Boggy Creek Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Landstreet Rd Joyce Dr Tradeport Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Laureate Bv Veterans Wy Narcoossee Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Laureate Bv Medical City Dr Veterans Wy Urban Center Collector C Laureate Bv Boggy Creek Rd Medical City Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Lee Rd Orange Blossom Tl Edgewater Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Leevista Bv Greeneway Ex. Young Pine Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Leevista Bv Narcoossee Rd Greeneway Ex. Suburban-Com Arterial A Leevista Bv Shadowridge Dr Narcoossee Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Legion Pl Orange Av Lakeview St Urban Core Collector C Livingston St Rosalind Av Maguire Bv Urban General Collector C Livingston St Hughey Av Rosalind Av Urban Core Collector C Livingston St Parramore Av Hughey Av Urban Center Collector C Loblolly Pine Cr Pine Lily St Bluestem St Suburban-Com Collector B Long Rd North Lake Orlando Py Clarcona Ocoee Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Lower Park Rd General Rees Av Lakemont Av Urban General Collector C Magnolia Av Orange Av Lakeview St Urban Core Arterial B Magnolia Av Livingston St Orange Av Urban Core Arterial C Magnolia Av Jackson St Livingston St Urban Core Collector C Magnolia Av Anderson St Jackson St Urban Core Collector C Maguire Bv Colonial Dr Bennet Rd Urban Center Collector C Maguire Bv Robinson St Colonial Dr Urban Center Arterial B Total Required ROW (ft) ROW Required per Side (ft)

18 Table 3 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM Complete Street Classification Roadway Segment S or W End N or E End Context Functional Class Access Class Major Bv Kirkman Rd Vineland Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Major Bv Universal Bv Kirkman Rd Urban Center Collector C Marks St Highland Av Mills Av Urban General Collector C Marks St Garland Av Highland Av Urban Core Collector C Maury Rd Rio Grande Av Edgewater Dr Urban General Collector C Mccoy Rd Conway Rd/ Tradeport Dr North Frontage Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Medical City Dr Lake Nona Bv Boggy Creek Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Medical City Dr Laureate Bv Lake Nona Bv Urban Center Collector C Medical City Dr Poitras Dr Laureate Bv Urban Center Collector C Medical City Dr Boggy Creek Rd Poitras Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Meeting Pl Lake Baldwin Ln Upper Park Rd Urban General Collector C Mercy Dr Colonial Dr Shader Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Mercy Dr Old Winter Garden Rd Colonial Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Metrowest Bv Kirkman Rd Pres Barack Obama Py Suburban-Com Collector B Metrowest Bv Hiawassee Rd Kirkman Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Michigan St Conway Rd Semoran Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Michigan St Conway Gardens Rd Conway Rd Urban Center Collector C Michigan St Interstate 4 Bumby Av Urban Center Arterial B Millenia Bv Oak Ridge Rd John Young Py Suburban-Com Collector B Miller St Boone/Lucerne/Sligh Orange Av Urban Center Collector C Mills Av Robinson St Nottingham Dr Urban Center Arterial B Mills Av Central Bv Robinson St Urban General Collector C Mills Av Anderson St South St Urban Center Collector C Mills Av Briercliff Dr Anderson St Urban General Collector C Mills Av (NB-Brown Av) South St Central Bv Urban General Collector C Mills Av (SB-Thornton Av) Robinson St South St Urban General Collector C Moss Park Rd Narcoossee Rd Wewahootee Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Narcoossee Rd Beachline Ex. Goldenrod Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Narcoossee Rd Cent. Florida Greeneway Beachline Ex Suburban-Com Arterial A Narcoossee Rd Orange County Line Cent. Florida Greeneway Suburban-Com Arterial A Nebraska St Mills Av Forest Av Urban General Collector C Nemours Lake Nona Bv Narcoossee Rd Suburban-Com Collector B New Broad St Bennet Rd Jake St Urban Center Collector C New Hampshire St Formosa Av Orange Av Urban General Collector C North Frontage Rd Forbes Pl. Semoran Bv Suburban-Com Collector B North Frontage Rd Mccoy Rd Forbes Place Suburban-Com Collector B North Lake Orlando Py North Ln. Lake Breeze Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Northlake Py Bluestem St Narcoossee Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Total Required ROW (ft) ROW Required per Side (ft)

19 Table 3 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM Complete Street Classification Roadway Segment S or W End N or E End Context Functional Class Access Class North Ln. Pine Hills Rd North Lake Orlando Py Suburban-Res Collector C Oakridge Rd Grandnational Dr John Young Py Urban Center Collector C Old Winter Garden Rd Hiawassee Rd silverton st Texas Av Suburban-Com Arterial A Orange Av Princeton St Berkshire Av Urban Center Collector C Orange Av Magnolia Av Princeton St Urban Center Collector C Orange Av Garland Av Magnolia Av Urban Core Collector C Orange Av Colonial Dr Garland Av Urban Core Collector C Orange Av East-West Ex. Colonial Dr Urban Core Arterial C Orange Av Lake Lucerne Cir. East-West Ex. Urban Core Arterial C Orange Av Highway Pl. Lake Lucerne Cir. Urban Center Arterial B Orange Av Wetherbee Rd Tradeport Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Orange Blossom Tl John Young Py/ Lee Rd Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Orange Blossom Tl Golfview St John Young Py/ Lee Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Orange Blossom Tl Grand St Golfview St Urban Center Arterial B Orange Blossom Tl 35Th St 29th St Suburban-Com Arterial A Orange Center Bv John Young Py Tampa Av Suburban-Com Arterial A Orange Center Bv Goldwyn Av John Young Py Urban General Collector C Osceola Av Delaney Av Michigan St Urban Center Collector C Oxalis Av Curry Ford Rd Lake Underhill Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Par St Edgewater Dr Clay Av/ Clay St Suburban-Com Collector B Parramore Av Amelia St Colonial Dr Urban Center Collector C Parramore Av Livingston St Amelia St Urban Center Collector C Parramore Av Kaley St Livingston St Urban General Collector C Patch Rd Bent Pine Dr Hoffner Av Suburban-Com Collector B Peel Av Stoneview Rd Curry Ford Rd Suburban-Res Collector C Pershing Av Semoran Bv Goldenrod Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Pershing Av Dixie Belle Dr Semoran Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Pine Hills Rd Fir Dr Liming Av Suburban-Com Arterial A Pine Lily St Dowden Rd Loblolly Pine Cr Suburban-Com Collector B Pineloch Av Orange Av Delaney Av Urban Center Collector C Poitras Av Poitras Bv Boggy Creek Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Poitras Bv Medical City Dr Narcoossee Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Poitras Bv Boggy Creek Rd Medical City Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Pres Barack Obama Py Metrowest Bv Central Av/Pine Hills Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Pres Barack Obama Py Conroy Rd Metrowest Bv Suburban-Com Arterial A Primrose Dr Robinson St Colonial Dr Urban Center Collector C Primrose Dr Curry Ford Rd Robinson St Urban General Collector C Princeton St Interstate 4 Mills Av Urban Center Arterial B Total Required ROW (ft) ROW Required per Side (ft)

20 Table 3 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM Complete Street Classification Roadway Segment S or W End N or E End Context Functional Class Access Class Princeton St Smith St Interstate 4 Urban General Arterial C Princeton St Orange Blossom Tl Smith St Urban Center Arterial B Princeton St John Young Py Orange Blossom Tl Suburban-Com Arterial A Princeton St Silver Star Rd John Young Py Suburban-Com Arterial A Radebaugh Way Millenia Bv Vineland Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Raleigh St Kirkman Rd Ivey Ln Suburban-Com Collector B Raleigh St Hiawassee Rd Kirkman Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Randal Park Bv Langefield St Econlockhatchee Tl Suburban-Com Collector B Randal Park Bv Dowden Rd Langefield St Suburban-Com Collector B Raper Dairy Rd Grant St Curry Ford Rd Suburban-Com Collector B Rio Grande Av Princeton St Maury Rd Urban General Collector C Rio Grande Av Anderson St Church St Urban Center Collector C Rio Grande Av 36Th St 29th St Urban Center Collector C Robert Trent Jones Dr Metrowest Bv Arnold Palmer Dr Suburban-Res Collector C Robinson St Rosalind Av Maguire Bv/ Crystal Lake Dr Urban Center Arterial B Robinson St Hughey Av Rosalind Av Urban Core Arterial C Robinson St Orange Blossom Tl Hughey Av Urban Center Arterial B Rollins St Orange Av Mills Av Urban Center Collector C Rosalind Av Orange Av Livingston St Urban Core Arterial C Rosamond Dr North Lake Orlando Py Orange Blossom Tl Suburban-Res Collector C Sand Lake Rd Canada Av Mandarin Dr Suburban-Com Arterial A Seaboard Rd Coast Line Dr Mercy Dr Suburban-Com Collector B Semoran Bv Beachline Ex. Hibiscus Rd Suburban-Com Arterial A Shader Rd Mercy Dr Orange Blossom Tl Suburban-Com Collector B Shadowridge Dr Leevista Bv Hoffner Av Suburban-Com Collector B Shadowridge Dr Forbes Place Leevista Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Silver Star Rd Orange Blossom Tl Rio Grande Av Urban Center Collector C Silver Star Rd Princeton St Orange Blossom Tl Suburban-Com Arterial A Silver Star Rd Kingsland Av Princeton St Suburban-Com Arterial A Smith St Ann Arbor Av Princeton St Urban General Arterial C South Lake Orlando Py North Ln. Lake Breeze Rd Suburban-Res Collector C South St East-West Ex. Ramp Lake Underhill Rd Urban Center Collector C South St Magnolia Av East-West Ex. Ramp Urban Core Collector C South St Division Av Magnolia Av Urban Core Collector C South St Orange Blossom Tl Division Av Urban Center Collector C Storey Park Bv Dowden Rd Innovation Way South Suburban-Com Collector B Summerlin Av Kaley St Marks St Urban General Collector C T.G. Lee Bv Augusta National Dr TPC Bv Suburban-Com Collector B Total Required ROW (ft) ROW Required per Side (ft)

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004 Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1. General Provisions 1.1 Jurisdiction 3 1.2 Purpose and Intent 3 1.3 Modification 3

More information

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. (Section 9J-5.019) GOALS, OBJECTIVES POLICIES

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. (Section 9J-5.019) GOALS, OBJECTIVES POLICIES TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT (Section 9J-5.019) GOALS, OBJECTIVES GOAL 1 To facilitate a balanced multi-modal transportation system that encourages increased mobility options, and provides for energy efficient

More information

2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.

2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. 2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT. The purpose of this element is to assist in establishing an adequate transportation system within the City and to plan for future motorized and non-motorized traffic circulation

More information

GOAL 2A: ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

GOAL 2A: ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY. 2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The purpose of this element is to assist in establishing an adequate transportation system within the City and to plan for future motorized and non-motorized traffic circulation

More information

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING 1.1 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 1.1.1 Roadway Functional Classification The Multnomah County Comprehensive Framework Plan s Policy 34: Trafficways and the Functional Classification

More information

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access SECTION 2 Land Development and Roadway Access 2.1 Land Use and Access Management The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines

More information

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan ROADWAYS The County s road system permits the movement of goods and people between communities and regions, using any of a variety of modes of travel. Roads provide access to virtually all property. They

More information

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Chapter 5 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Functional classification is a system by which streets and roadways may be distinguished by types according to their function within the entire transportation network.

More information

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy City Commission Policy 600 Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy DEPARTMENT: Public Works DATE ADOPTED: June 7, 1995 DATE OF LAST REVISION: December 10, 2014 Policy No. 600.01 AUTHORITY: PASS City of Tallahassee-Leon

More information

CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT. Background. Principles of Access Management. Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP)

CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT. Background. Principles of Access Management. Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP) CHAPTER 7 ACCESS MANAGEMENT Background Principles of Access Management Hennepin County Transportation Systems Plan (HC-TSP) Chapter 7 Access Management 7.1 Background Access management has become an important

More information

MetroPlan Orlando Travel Time Study & Benefit Cost Analysis

MetroPlan Orlando Travel Time Study & Benefit Cost Analysis GMB Engineers & Planners, Inc. & MetroPlan Orlando MetroPlan Orlando Travel Time Study & Benefit Cost Analysis Travel Time Studies and Benefit Cost Analysis for Signal Retiming Projects covering Orange,

More information

PennDOT Access Management Model Ordinances Training

PennDOT Access Management Model Ordinances Training PennDOT Access s Training Trainers: Chad Dixson, AICP, TPD Angela Watson, PB Objective of Today Assist Pennsylvania s municipalities and transportation professionals in better understanding the benefits

More information

Orange County, Florida Public Works Department's 10-Year Roadway Program

Orange County, Florida Public Works Department's 10-Year Roadway Program Project Name 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Alafaya Tr (Avalon Park Bv to Mark Twain Bv) 5062 Right-of-Way Acquisition 5062 Construction All American Bv (Edgewater Dr to Forest City

More information

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Access Management Regulations and Standards Access Management Regulations and Standards January 2014 Efficient highway operation Reasonable property access Concept of Access Management The way to manage access to land development while preserving

More information

Access Management Regulations and Standards

Access Management Regulations and Standards Access Management Regulations and Standards Efficient highway operation Reasonable property access Concept of Access Management The way to manage access to land development while simultaneously preserving

More information

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit The Washtenaw County Access Management Plan was developed based on the analysis of existing

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.0 THOROUGHFARE PLAN. Analysis of Future Conditions Thoroughfare Plan Proposed Cross-Sections.. 7.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.0 THOROUGHFARE PLAN. Analysis of Future Conditions Thoroughfare Plan Proposed Cross-Sections.. 7. TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.0 THOROUGHFARE PLAN Analysis of Future Conditions.. 7.2 Thoroughfare Plan.. 7.3 Proposed Cross-Sections.. 7.4 Arterials Minor Arterials Collectors Local Streets Thoroughfare Plan Map

More information

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:

More information

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN 5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN This chapter describes circulation and streetscape improvements proposed for the Northwest Chico Specific Plan Area. It includes detailed design specifications for existing

More information

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians Design Manual Chapter 5 - Roadway Design 5L - Access Management 5L-3 Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians This section addresses access location, spacing, turn lane and median needs, including

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA, RELATING

More information

Appendix L: Current Plans and Projects List Municipal Planning Board Projects (January 2007 through June 2016)

Appendix L: Current Plans and Projects List Municipal Planning Board Projects (January 2007 through June 2016) Appendix L: Current Plans and s List Municipal Planning Board s (January 2007 through June 2016) Appendix L Current Plans & s List Part 1 (MPB Approved s Outside Downtown DRI through June 2016) Note 1:

More information

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods:

Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods: 13.1 GENERAL APPLICATION PROCESS Access requests to County streets and roadways are processed through one of the following methods: A. Planned Developments may set general locations for access points.

More information

CITY OF LUCAS 2014 MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

CITY OF LUCAS 2014 MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN INTRODUCTION CITY OF LUCAS 2014 MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN A thoroughfare system is intended to provide an effective means of moving vehicles within and through a city. The thoroughfare plan will assist

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 15, 2016 DATE: October 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Adoption of amendments to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) to create a new Pedestrian

More information

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S

T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S T A B L E OF C O N T E N T S PART III SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, C & C D PAGE PAGE Responsibility for Development of Streets......... 29 Right-of-Way Widths...... 37 Purpose...........

More information

Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures

Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures These standards have been prepared for the use of all jurisdictions to incorporate into their

More information

Bikeways Network and Facilities

Bikeways Network and Facilities Findings from the bicycle survey showed a high bicycle use and demand for on and off road bikeway facilities. Currently, the City has 185 miles of bike lanes, 40 miles of signed routes to connect the network

More information

Access Management Standards

Access Management Standards Access Management Standards Section 1: Application of Access Standards This chapter describes the Department's access management standards for access connections on the county roadway system. The standards

More information

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents. N o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents. 84 Transportation CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION Transportation

More information

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES (Adopted by the Town Council on June 30, 2004) (Revised December 6, 2010) (Revised February 8, 2016) POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC

More information

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets

Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets Access Management Regulations and Standards for Minor Arterials, Collectors, Local Streets September 2009 Paul Grasewicz Access Management Administrator Concept of Access Management The way to manage access

More information

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF

Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF Access Management Guidelines February 2013 THE CITY OF Table of Contents Introduction 2 Review and Approval Process 5 Technical Guidelines 9... 10... 12 3. Separation Distance: Non-Signalized All-Turns

More information

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS INTRODUCTION The thoroughfare plan will assist public officials in the development of a specialized system for efficient and safe movement of vehicular traffic while minimizing potential conflicts with

More information

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements Presented to the City Council By Randle Harwood, Planning and Development, and Richard Zavala, Parks and Community Services September 24, 2013 Purpose Review

More information

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections FHWA-SA-10-002 Technical Summary Photo: Ralph Bentley (used with permission) 0 Access Management is: The design, implementation and management of entry

More information

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES November 16, 2011 Deb Humphreys North Central Texas Council of Governments Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Snapshot of the Guide 1. Introduction

More information

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION TRASBURG RANSPORTATION LAN DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

More information

Classification Criteria

Classification Criteria SCHEDULE D TO RECOMMENDED OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 40 SCHEDULE C-4 Road Criteria Criteria Traffic Service Objective Land Service/Access Typical Daily Traffic Volume Flow characteristics Travel Speed

More information

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009 Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT 2009 PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009 1 What is Smart Transportation? Photographer: heyjude. Used through license

More information

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors 68 Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors Corridors have different functions in a region. Some corridors are used to get smoothly and rapidly through a region or to get quickly to major

More information

Appendix L Current Plans & Projects List (MPB Approved Projects Outside Downtown DRI: January 2007 May 2014)

Appendix L Current Plans & Projects List (MPB Approved Projects Outside Downtown DRI: January 2007 May 2014) Note 1: s completed and in April 1, 2013 Base Year or Year End 2013 data have been removed from CP&P List. Note 2: s without a specific development program have been removed from the CP&P List. Note 4:

More information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Waterford Lakes Small Area Study Existing Traffic Conditions PREPARED FOR: ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION ORLANDO, FLORIDA PREPARED WITH: INWOOD CONSULTING ENGINEERS

More information

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections

DRAFT - CITY OF MEDFORD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Roadway Cross-Sections Roadway Cross-Sections Medford s roadway cross-section standards apply to new and reconstructed roads. The crosssections take into consideration roadway function and operational characteristics, including

More information

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road West Dimond Blvd Jodhpur St to Sand Lake CSS Transportation Project Summary Municipality of Anchorage Project # 05 005 Project Manager: John Smith, P.E. (MOA PM&E) Project Administrator: Julie Makela,

More information

CIRCLE DRIVE TRAFFIC AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDE. Management Principles and Implementation Concepts

CIRCLE DRIVE TRAFFIC AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDE. Management Principles and Implementation Concepts CIRCLE DRIVE TRAFFIC AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT POLICY GUIDE A. PREFACE Management Principles and Implementation Concepts The intent of this policy guide is to provide interim guidance on the implementation

More information

Project Description Form 8EE

Project Description Form 8EE Project Description Form 8EE Basic Project Information Submitting Jurisdiction/Agency: Town of Dumfries Project Title: Route 1 (Fraley Blvd) Widening: Brady's Hill Road to Dumfries Road Project Location:

More information

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A A1. Functional Classification Table A-1 illustrates the Metropolitan Council s detailed criteria established for the functional classification of roadways within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table

More information

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009 Summary: Several recent studies have assessed potential development and redevelopment opportunities in the Mercer Crossing area of Trenton, Ewing, and Lawrence. This Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street

More information

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility ADA Transition Plan FY19-FY28 Date: November 5, 2018 Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND The federal statute known as the Americans with Disabilities

More information

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines City of Memphis Effective Date: December 1, 2013 Bicycle/Pedestrian Program 125 N. Main Street Memphis, TN 38103 (901) 576-6710 www.bikepedmemphis.com City of Memphis Executive Summary It is current practice

More information

5.0 Roadway System Plan

5.0 Roadway System Plan Southwest Boise Transportation Study Page 16 5.0 Roadway System Plan The Roadway System Plan outlines roadway improvements in the Initial Study Area. It forecasts future deficiencies on the arterial system,

More information

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan

Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Introduction Chapter 6 Transportation Plan Transportation Plan Introduction This chapter describes the components of Arvada s transportation system, comprised

More information

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD INTERSECTION NEEDS AT SR 7 and OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SR 7 Extension Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From Okeechobee Boulevard (SR

More information

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project Dale Mabry Highway to Bayshore Boulevard February 08, 2018 Photo Source: Tampa Bay Times Alessandra Da Pra Meeting Format Introduction Resurfacing Information

More information

Chapter 6: Transportation

Chapter 6: Transportation Chapter 6: Transportation I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Transportation Plan element of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide guidance to the City of North Mankato, as well as existing and future landowners

More information

City of Homewood Transportation Plan

City of Homewood Transportation Plan City of Homewood Transportation Plan Prepared for: City of Homewood, Alabama Prepared by: Skipper Consulting, Inc. May 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION... 1 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION

More information

Complete Streets and Context Classification

Complete Streets and Context Classification Complete Streets and Context Classification April 2017 Secretary s Pedestrian Safety Initiative Dangerous by Design (2011, 2014) Orlando, Tampa, Jacksonville, Miami-Ft. Lauderdale Secretary Ananth Prasad

More information

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02 1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver 1.02 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02 2 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver 1.02 FOREWORD FOR ACCESS MANAGEMENT

More information

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements Prepared by: Public Works Department Engineering Division October 2015 Table of Contents Section I Introduction.. 3

More information

FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets

FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets Billy L. Hattaway, PE District One Secretary Secretary s Pedestrian Safety Initiative Dangerous by Design

More information

10A. DATE: October 5, Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee. Kevin Colin, Deputy Planning Manager Curt Bates, City Engineer

10A. DATE: October 5, Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee. Kevin Colin, Deputy Planning Manager Curt Bates, City Engineer 10A DATE: October 5, 2016 TO: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee Kevin Colin, Deputy Planning Manager Curt Bates, City Engineer Discussion and Provide Comments, Associated

More information

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation Mixed Use Centers Complete Streets Guidelines Project Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation December 10, 2008 Project Objectives: Conduct an inter-departmental and agency process to study

More information

City of Bartow Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Element

City of Bartow Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Element City of Bartow 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amended through January 7, 2013 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOAL: IT SHALL BE A GOAL OF THE CITY OF BARTOW TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

More information

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL

More information

CHAPTER 5 TRANSPORTATION GOAL

CHAPTER 5 TRANSPORTATION GOAL CHAPTER 5 TRANSPORTATION GOAL Create and sustain a transportation system that meets the demands for existing and future traffic; skillfully integrates existing and planned development; and provides a safe

More information

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans. 4.1 GENERAL This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans. These Roadway Standards are for new construction and modification

More information

APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS

APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS APPENDIX I: ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND PROJECT CONSISTENCY STANDARDS The Santa Barbara County Comprehensive General Plan Circulation Element Policy A states that: "The roadway classifications, intersection

More information

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY A1 Roadway Resurfacing $23,846,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Roadway resurfacing A2 Signal Replacement $6,000,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Replace traffic signals. B1 W 6th St

More information

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Mobility 2040 Supported Goals Improve the availability of transportation options for people and goods. Support travel efficiency measures and system enhancements targeted at congestion

More information

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete. Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete. 1 2 3 Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make

More information

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information Chapter 1240 Turning Roadways 1240.01 General 1240.02 References 1240.03 Definitions 1240.04 Turning Roadway Widths 1240.05 Documentation 1240.01 General The roadway on a curve may need to be widened to

More information

/ ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

/ ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA / ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 24, 2016 DATE: August 11, 2016 SUBJECT: Amendment of the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Streets Element to include new local

More information

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction: Introduction: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) has continued the efforts started through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency

More information

ADA & Public Rights of Way

ADA & Public Rights of Way ADA & Public Rights of Way Overview of Current and Up-coming Requirements FDOT Design Training Expo 2012 Orlando, FL Dean Perkins, RA - ADA Coordinator Florida Department of Transportation Office of Design,

More information

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN Master Thoroughfare Plan Update November 2015 Prepared for Town of Northlake AVO 30659 11/11/2015 1201 North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081 Firm Registration No. 312 MASTER

More information

Approved August 12, 1991 Amended March 14, 2016

Approved August 12, 1991 Amended March 14, 2016 Approved August 12, 1991 Amended March 14, 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES INTERMODAL SYSTEM GOAL 1 To develop a balanced transportation system

More information

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department 9/1/2009 Introduction Traffic studies are used to help the city determine potential impacts to the operation of the surrounding roadway network. Two

More information

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions Why is this roadway needed? Can't SR 50, University Boulevard and Aloma Avenue be widened instead of building this road? The need for this roadway was identified and determined through the East Orange

More information

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE 10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE Road Engineering Design Guidelines Version 1.0 March 2017 City of Toronto, Transportation Services City of Toronto Page 0 Background In early 2014, Transportation Services

More information

Services Department A September 18, 2006 Region of Durham Recommended Arterial Corridor All Wards Guidelines Study

Services Department A September 18, 2006 Region of Durham Recommended Arterial Corridor All Wards Guidelines Study Report To: From: Subject: Development Services Committee Commissioner, Development Item: Date of Report: DS-06-55 September 13, 2006 File: Date of Meeting: Services Department A-2261-0002 September 18,

More information

San Jose Transportation Policy

San Jose Transportation Policy San Jose Transportation Policy Protected Intersections in LOS Policies to Support Smart Growth Presented by: Manuel Pineda City of San Jose Department of Transportation Bay Area Map San Francisco Oakland

More information

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate) WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES Guide for NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate) 2014 GUIDE FOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM (NHS) HIGHWAYS (NHS ARTERIALS, Non-Interstate) PRESERVATION REHABILITATION RECONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION

More information

STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN

STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN Introduction The street and highway system in the Winston-Salem Urban Area consists of thousands of miles of traffic carrying facilities, ranging from short local residential streets

More information

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE 2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE Road Engineering Design Guidelines Version 2.0.1 May 2018 City of Toronto, Transportation Services City of Toronto Page 0 Background In early 2014, Transportation Services initiated

More information

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY POLICY OBJECTIVE: The City of Bloomington will enhance safety, mobility, accessibility and convenience for transportation network users of all ages and abilities,

More information

Roadway Capital Improvement Program Public Works Engineering and Highway Construction February 2018 Monthly Report

Roadway Capital Improvement Program Public Works Engineering and Highway Construction February 2018 Monthly Report Public Works Engineering and Highway ruction TYPE DIST NAME LOCATION % ADA 5 Arbor Ridge 100 Jan 2018 Jan 2018 Jan 2018 J. Naditz ADA 3 Bumby & Raeford 100 Jan 2018 Jan 2018 Jan 2018 J. Naditz ADA 6 Canada

More information

RECOMMENDED MOTION: I MOVE TO PASS SECOND READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE 556, TO REMOVE NE 173RD STREET FROM THE DESIGNATED PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED STREETS.

RECOMMENDED MOTION: I MOVE TO PASS SECOND READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE 556, TO REMOVE NE 173RD STREET FROM THE DESIGNATED PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED STREETS. CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WA REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL 17301 133rd Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 wvvw.ci.woodinville.wa.us To: Honorable City Council Date: 02/05/2013 From: Richard A. Leahy, City Manager

More information

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING I. Introduction: The City of Coconut Creek recognizes that the conditions of residential streets can greatly affect neighborhood livability;

More information

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails Chapter 7 Transportation Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails 7.1 TRANSPORTATION BACKGROUND The District of Maple Ridge faces a number of unique

More information

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY ORIGIN/AUTHORITY Clause 1, Report No. 1-1980 and Clause 4, Report No. 22-1990 of the Works and Utilities Committee; Clause 6, Report No. 17-2004 of the Planning and Operations Committee; and Clause D5,

More information

4.11 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION

4.11 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION 4.11 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION This section was developed using information from a Traffic Analysis Report prepared for the project by OEG, Inc. (2010), the Paradiso del Mare Ocean and Inland Estates

More information

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 4.1 Introduction... 4-1 4.1.1 General... 4-1 4.1.2 Applicant Responsibility... 4-1 4.1.3 Capacity and Safety Issues... 4-1 A.

More information

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers

Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers Aurora Urban Street Standards For Transit Oriented Developments and Urban Centers I. Purpose These standards will be applied to create a safe, comfortable, pleasant and pedestrian-friendly multi-modal

More information

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES 82 EAST BENCH MASTER PLAN 07 Introduction The East Bench transportation system is a collection of slow moving, treelined residential streets and major arteries that are the

More information

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks Circulation, as it is used in this General Plan, refers to the many ways people and goods move from place to place in Elk Grove and the region. Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including

More information

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN 3.01 GENERAL SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN For purposes of geometric and structural design, streets shall be classified according to the following table. The City Engineer will determine the class of all proposed

More information

Appendix D. US 54 /400 Study Area Proposed Access Management Code City of Andover, KS

Appendix D. US 54 /400 Study Area Proposed Access Management Code City of Andover, KS Access Control Appendix D US 54 /400 Study Area Proposed Access Management Code City of Andover, KS D1 Table of Contents Section 1: Purpose Section 2: Applicability Section 3: Conformance with Plans,

More information

Route 7 Corridor Study

Route 7 Corridor Study Route 7 Corridor Study Executive Summary Study Area The following report analyzes a segment of the Virginia State Route 7 corridor. The corridor study area, spanning over 5 miles in length, is a multi

More information

Sponsored by Mrs. Gina Gregory and Mr. Reggie Copeland.

Sponsored by Mrs. Gina Gregory and Mr. Reggie Copeland. AN ORDINANCE REGULATION TO AMEND THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS FOR THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALBAMA CODES TO CREATE NEW WALKABLE STREET STANDARDS THAT ENABLES TRADITIONAL, WALKABLE VILLAGE AND NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS

More information