Helicopter Rappel - Equipment Testing and Evaluation
|
|
- Naomi Walsh
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Helicopter Rappel - Equipment Testing and Evaluation Submitted to: Yosemite National Park Date(s) of Testing/Evaluation: October 28-30, 2010 Submitted by: Mike Gibbs Rigging for, LLC Ouray, Colorado USA Introduction: Rigging for, LLC, in conjunction with Yosemite National Park Service (NPS) all-hazard personnel, conducted three days of drop testing and systems analysis on helicopter rappel equipment and scenarios. The testing was completed at the Yosemite National Park Crane Flat Helibase utilizing the Helibase rappel tower. The drop testing incorporated the use of live rappellers (in a belayed capacity) as well as an articulating mannequin combined with steel weights (aka ). Background: The legacy system that has been utilized by both the NPS and the US Forest Service for helicopter rappel operations includes a ½ inch Nylon 12-strand braided rope in combination with a Sky Genie descent control device manufactured by Descent Control, Inc. The legacy system has been in service for many years and has been safely employed in thousands of helicopter rappels. The intent of the October 28-30, 2010 test series was to critically examine newer, modern equipment options for helicopter rappelling as potential replacements or alternatives to the legacy system. Objectives: In addition to subjective equipment evaluation in a helicopter rappelling capacity, the test series focused on objective evaluation of specific scenarios that were expected to produce high maximum arrest forces. Namely: a fall/slip by the rappeller out of the aircraft while near the edge of the open door (e.g. loss of balance due to a change in orientation of the aircraft) a rapid descent followed by a sudden stop (e.g. allowing a mechanical device to initiate a rapid stop or rappelling quickly into a knotted rope) Various combinations of newer, modern equipment were examined as well as the legacy system for comparative purposes. Maximum arrest forces were captured using an electronic load cell. 2010, Rigging for
2 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation The test set-up(s) were intentionally severe in their nature in order to provide meaningful data and direction on the question: In the above scenarios, are the peak forces being transmitted to the anchor system in the aircraft too high given the combination(s) of the newer, modern devices and ropes? Equipment Selection and Criteria: A total of three descent control devices (DCD) and four rope types were selected for examination. The DCDs chosen were the Petzl RIG, the SMC Spider and the Sky Genie. The rope types were the Petzl Vector, PMI EZ Bend, Bluewater Dynastat and the braided nylon rope from the legacy system. The criteria for DCD selection included the following: general size, weight and profile of the device ergonomics of the design (e.g. handle position and curvature; use with gloved hands) bandwidth of rope diameter accepted ability to stack multiple devices on the rope in order to facilitate rapid rappel transitions ability to rig/derig the rope from the device without removing it from the attachment point carabiner (this is a speed factor while de-rigging a device at the end of a rappel in order to disconnect from the line going to the aircraft; additionally, it prevents dropped devices) ease of loading the rope (i.e. presence of appropriate icons, intuitive design) ease of inspection ease of use (dexterity required) presence of a incorrect loading fail-safe presence of a deadman feature (aka hands free stop - an automatic stop initiated by the device if the rappeller were to let go of the DCD) presence of a panic stop feature (a camming effect on a mechanical device whereby the device locks up and/or inhibits/stops rope travel should the operator open the cam too widely in a panic reaction) presence of third party certifications and/or classifications (e.g. CE, NFPA, UL, ANSI) Petzl RIG SMC Spider Descent Control Inc. Sky Genie 2010, Rigging for Page 2 of 14
3 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation The criteria for rope selection included the following: elongation diameter breaking strength construction fiber content suppleness presence of a sewn termination attachment point Test Method: Two scenarios were examined in the test series: Scenario 1: Scenario 2: a fall/slip by the rappeller out of the aircraft while near the edge of the open door a rapid rappel followed by a sudden stop Additionally, within the context of each of those two independent examinations, we utilized two test set-ups per scenario: Scenario 1 tests were conducted with a single DCD on the rope as well as stacked DCDs Scenario 2 tests were conducted using live rappellers as well as. Scenario 1 Test Design This test was intended to replicate a rappeller falling out of the aircraft while near the door opening due to a slip or a change in orientation of the aircraft. The resulting fall would produce a shock force on to the rappel system. To replicate a representative amount of rope-in-service at the time of the event, the following steps were followed: 1. the spotter anchored the rappel rope to the overhead anchor point in the aircraft 2. the spotter re-directed that rope through the change-of-direction carabiner anchored above the door opening 3. the spotter pulled up slack rope from below the re-direction point and handed a bight of that rope to the rappeller seated in the first position nearest the door 4. the rappeller reeved the rope into the DCD, pulled the running end of the rope hand tight and secured the DCD 5. the spotter made their system inspections and gave the agreed upon OK signal to the rappeller 2010, Rigging for Page 3 of 14
4 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation Rappeller takes a bight of slack to load device, creating a potential free fall scenario out of the aircraft Rappeller loading a DCD At this point in the test design, we then measured how much rope was in-service between the DCD and the primary anchor point in the aircraft. The amount of rope was 5 ½ feet. To replicate a representative amount of slack in the system prior to the rappeller falling out of the aircraft the following steps were used: 1. the rappeller stood up from their seated position and made their way to the door exit 2. the rappeller stopped at the door opening just prior to grabbing the pre-rigged handle (an anchored Figure of 8 plate which is standard procedure in the legacy program) 3. the rappeller did not take in any slack rope through their DCD during this maneuver 4. a linear measurement was then taken of the distance between the DCD attached to the rappeller and the primary anchor point. This distance was 5 feet. As a result of this test design methodology, a drop test using an articulating mannequin of ½ foot freefall on 5 ½ feet of rope would have been sufficient to accurately represent a slip/fall out of the aircraft. However, because certain mechanical devices allow some rope to slip or travel through the device when not under tension (e.g. while approaching the door; aka untensioned slip ) it was felt by the examiners that the amount of slack rope should be increased to 1 foot. This increased amount of freefall would produce a greater peak force on the system. 2010, Rigging for Page 4 of 14
5 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation Quick Release Mechanism DCD in position for a drop As stated above in the Objectives section, the test design was intentionally skewed to be slightly more severe that you would expect in a real scenario in order to help answer the question: Are the peak forces being transmitted to the anchor system in the aircraft too high given the combination(s) of the newer, modern devices and ropes? If the recorded forces were at acceptable levels using this test design, then a presumption could be made that they would be at acceptable levels in less severe circumstances. All drop tests conducted in Scenario 1 employed the use of and steel weights. The total test mass was 300 lbs. the maximum allowable rappeller weight as indicated by the Interagency Helicopter Rappel Guide. was 184 lbs. and the steel weights (and backpack) were 116 lbs. All tests were conducted using a cantilevered beam off of the drop tower. This enabled us to drop the test mass in a freefall without risking s legs becoming entangled in the skids. Any striking of the skids would have reduced peak forces transmitted to the primary anchor point in the aircraft. Our objective in the test design was to make it an intentionally severe examination with respect to the forces created by a fall out of the aircraft. 2010, Rigging for Page 5 of 14
6 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation Load Cell attached to rope connected to Temporary suspension line to quick release mechanism positioning mechanism Quick release mechanism Scenario 1 test set-up During the test series, all of the DCDs were brand-new save for the legacy system device (Sky Genie). Because the same DCDs were used on multiple drop tests, they were only brand-new on their initial drop test. Multiple rope types were used in the test series. The ropes consisted of brand-new, new with limited use and older used rope (the legacy system rope). Additionally, rope ends were swapped between drop tests for a given rope sample. For example, a drop test would be conducted on Rope X; the next drop test would often use the very same rope, but the ends would be switched hence the terms in the drop testing log sheets (Appendix A) of Side A and Side B. Switching the rope ends between drop tests allowed for some relaxation time of the shock-loaded rope. Subsequent drop tests on that partially relaxed rope would typically produce higher peak forces, as expected. The test series was conducted this way as a result of limited rope resources readily available for examination. A quick-release mechanism was incorporated into the test mass suspension system. For a given drop test, the test mass was quick-released on to the DCD and rope combination; forces were measured by an electronic load cell set at 2400 Hz. 2010, Rigging for Page 6 of 14
7 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation Scenario 2 Test Design This test was intended to replicate a rappeller in a rapid descent coming to a sudden stop. Tests were conducted using as well as live rappellers. The speed of the rappels was not measured and it appeared to be highly variable. Live rappellers were instructed to rappel fast and then let go of the DCD release mechanism upon reaching a visual marker attached to the rappel tower. The live rappellers were belayed with a separate rope. Force measurement was taken with an electronic dynamometer as opposed to a load cell. The initial tests using a load cell and live rappellers had such small recorded forces that it was difficult to discern the peak force from the normal oscillations in the force/time curve. Spotter briefing the rappellers Rappeller on skid prior to rapid descent 2010, Rigging for Page 7 of 14
8 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation The test set-up using as a rapid rappeller was a difficult-to-replicate challenge. To replicate an out-of-control rappeller followed by a sudden stop, the following steps were used: 1. was positioned on rope just below the skids approximately 50 feet above the ground. 2. An attachment loop was fixed to the end of the DCD handle (SMC Spider). A long extension came off of that attachment loop - towards the ground and was connected to a stack of independently suspended weights (63 lbs.; enough weight to smoothly initiate the DCD cam). 3. The independent-weights suspension system incorporated a quick-release mechanism to transfer the 63 lbs. of weight on to the DCD handle attachment loop, thereby initiating an out-of-control rappel. The 63 lbs. of weight were initially suspended approximately 6 feet off of the ground. 4. When the weights contacted the ground - after 6 feet of travel the force on the DCD handle would cease and the DCD cam would engage and initiate a sudden stop. On the tests, forces were measured by an electronic load cell set at 2400 Hz. Cord to 63 lbs. of suspended weight Temporary weight suspension including quick release mechanism Remaining rappel rope, suspended to provide full simulated weight Cord fixed to DCD handle Scenario 2 test set-up Results and Discussion: On October 28-29, 2010, a total of 38 tests were conducted and recorded at the Yosemite National Park Crane Flat Helibase utilizing the Helibase rappel tower. A total of 31 tests involved the use of as the test mass; an additional 7 tests employed live rappellers in a sudden stop scenario. Additional rappel system evaluations were conducted on the afternoon of October 29, 2010, utilizing live rappellers, but no force measurements were recorded the forces were benign as they did not involve a sudden stop simulation. The additional rappels were used to evaluate ropes and DCDs against objective/subjective criteria. The live rappellers subsequently completed evaluation forms (Appendix C) during the October 30, 2010, testing debrief and discussion. 2010, Rigging for Page 8 of 14
9 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation The summary statistics are limited to drop tests #1-28, which involved testing to Scenario 1 parameters. The drop tests simulating a sudden stop (Scenario 2) were of a limited quantity and qualify only as a quick look from a testing standpoint. The results and discussion are categorized by DCD and rope. DCD A total of three DCDs were examined in the drop test series: Petzl RIG SMC Spider Descent Control Sky Genie Several other DCDs were considered, but they were eliminated in preliminary discussions for a variety of reasons specific to each device. The DCDs considered included: Petzl I D Diamond ATC Guide Edelrid Eddy Petzl Grigri Heightec PMI-Powerlock The vast majority of the drop tests were conducted on either the Petzl RIG or the SMC Spider. Of the available choices, these two DCDs were deemed to have the most promising overall mix of qualities as they pertain to a helicopter rappelling application. The Sky Genie was tested only twice in order to obtain quick look comparative data points. Additionally, the drop test parameters for the Sky Genie were modified slightly in order to account for the longer profile of the device. The overall data summary is as follows: Summary Data DCDs Force (lbf) Petzl RIG SMC Spider Sky Genie Minimum Maximum Average , Rigging for Page 9 of 14
10 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation The overall range of forces recorded for each device was similar. This was to be expected as there was very little observable slippage of rope through either device during the test series. It is likely that the overall range of forces recorded were almost exclusively attributable to the different rope types and their elongation qualities. Additionally, the forces recorded were below commonly-referenced (e.g. OSHA) maximum allowable arrest force values for an adult in a full body harness. Stacked Devices In helicopter rappel operations using the legacy system, stacking devices (pre-rigging them on the rappel line 3 in total to start) is a commonly utilized practice. Accordingly, it was an objective of this test series to determine if newer, cam-controlled devices could also be stacked. Notable performance differences were observed between the Petzl RIG and the SMC Spider when examined in a stacked configuration. Each of the two DCDs were tested in a manner similar to drop tests # 1-20 with the exception that two additional DCDs were stacked on the test rope (tests #21-28). This test set-up made it difficult to determine the fall factor for each drop. Additional rope (more than the prescribed 5 ½ feet) was required to position because of the reeving of rope through two additional devices. However, that extra rope was not providing an equivalent elongation quality because it was captured in a cammed device. As a result, we chose to ignore an actual fall factor calculation for the stacked drop tests. In addition, fall factor in this scenario is largely irrelevant, as the original freefall of 1 foot, as prescribed by the test set-up parameters, was still maintained for each of the tests. The accompanying photo illustrates the test set-up. Stacked SMC Spiders Stacked drop test set-up 2010, Rigging for Page 10 of 14
11 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation The SMC Spider performed satisfactorily in a stacked configuration. There was no visible damage to any of the DCDs or to the ropes examined. Additionally, the SMC Spider does not require (for security) a carabiner to be affixed to the device while in a stacked configuration. The PETZL RIG is not a suitable device in a stacked configuration as evidenced by drop test #21. During this test, the two stacked Petzl RIGs were both severely damaged (yielded) and no longer usable. Stacked Petzl RIG damage It is yet to be determined whether stacking cam-controlled devices is a suitable practice in helicopter rappel operations. The spotter used in the test series was a very experienced practitioner; he expressed that it was prohibitively difficult to manipulate stacked devices along a weighted rope. Although our test series briefly examined the stackability of the SMC Spider and Petzl Rig, it is not within the scope of this report to determine whether stacking is a practical helicopter rappel practice. Other DCD Criteria In addition to the empirical data on the two DCDs examined, a number of other criteria were evaluated. Some of the criteria were subjective observations by the live rappellers who participated in the test series. Other criteria were simply objective device qualities. These categories are covered in the rappeller evaluation forms in Appendix C as well as the chart below. 2010, Rigging for Page 11 of 14
12 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation SMC Petzl Objective Criteria Spider RIG Presence of a deadman feature X X Presence of a panic stop feature X* Presence of third party certifications and/or classifications X X Presence of an incorrect loading fail-safe Ability to stack multiple devices Ability to rig/de-rig a rope while attached to a carabiner X X * several of the live rappellers reported that it was difficult to engage the panic stop feature on the SMC Spider. Ropes A total of four make/model ropes were examined in the drop test series. Drop tests were repeated on the same rope samples. A variety of time lapses occurred between drop tests; as a result, rope relaxation times were not held constant. The Bluewater, PMI and Petzl models were all brand-new or new with limited use. The legacy rope was very used and three years old. The rope elongation properties for the four models are all different. Of the three non-legacy system ropes examined, the lowest elongation was the PMI EZ Bend and the highest elongation was the Petzl Vector. However, despite the differences in elongation properties, the three nonlegacy ropes would all be categorized as life safety ropes suitable for rappelling and/or rope rescue applications. X Summary Data Force (lbf) BlueWater Dynastat 11mm PMI EZ Bend 11mm Ropes Petzl Vector 11mm Legacy System Minimum Maximum Average , Rigging for Page 12 of 14
13 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation As indicated by the data summary, the range of recorded forces for the different rope models were similar. All three of the non-legacy system ropes produced acceptable peak forces given the drop test event that they were subjected to in the test series (i.e. well below OSHA values for maximum allowable force in a harness). Additionally, no visible rope damage occurred on any of the drops conducted. Anecdotally, one of the live rappellers commented that a higher elongation rope that was still within the low stretch or static categorization of rope (i.e. not a climbing or high-stretch dynamic rope) may be preferable in the event of a sudden stop. Specifically, live rappel test #38 used the lowest stretch rope (PMI EZ Bend) and produced a force on the order of 4+ times body weight (1012 lbf). Although still well below the OSHA allowed value of 8kN (1760 lbf), this deceleration force caused some discomfort to the rappeller across his harness straps. Recommendations: The drop test series was of a limited scope with respect to the: Number of drops conducted Number of DCDs examined Number of rope makes/models examined However, despite the relatively small sample size, a number of key observations can be made: 1. The forces generated by the different DCDs were of a similar nature 2. The forces generated by the different rope choices were of a similar nature 3. The forces generated by the Scenario 1 drop tests were below industry-referenced standards for acceptable fall arrest forces (e.g. OSHA) for an adult in a full body harness 4. The forces generated by the Scenario 2 drop tests were below industry-referenced standards for acceptable fall arrest forces (e.g. OSHA) for an adult in a full body harness The question posed in the Objectives portion of this report was: Are the peak forces being transmitted to the anchor system in the aircraft too high given the combination(s) of the newer, modern devices and ropes? The breaking strength of the primary anchor point bracket affixed to the interior of the aircraft is unknown; determining that breaking strength would provide valuable information towards increasing the understanding of the inherent system safety factors. However, a review of the data obtained in this test series reveals that the forces generated were well within human tolerable limits and were nowhere near the breaking strengths of the ropes or DCDs evaluated. Bear in mind that these were very severe test designs intended to expose a system and/or device weakness. It is unlikely that a live rappeller in an airborne helicopter could produce higher forces than were recorded in the test series. 2010, Rigging for Page 13 of 14
14 Helicopter Rappel- Equipment Testing and Evaluation Moving forward, it seems that the most pertinent information will come from anecdotal use by NPS all-hazard personnel on the rappel tower performing live rappels. Qualities such as the presence of specific safety features, ease of inspection, ergonomics of design and similar criteria will ultimately drive the choice of appropriate DCDs for the helicopter rappel program. The numerous DCD and rope qualities should be rigorously examined through repetitive live rappels in order to properly evaluate device and rope performance in normal helicopter rappelling circumstances. 2010, Rigging for Page 14 of 14
15 Helicopter Rappel Testing Yosemite National Park Date: Test # Time Rope Type: make, model,color Bluewater, Dynastat, 1 10:53 no visible rope damage Rope Type: size, material & construction 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, ~ Rope in Service (feet) Rope End (A or B) Appendix A 2010, Rigging for Fall Factor A 0.18 Rappeller Total Rappeller Weight 2 (lbs.) DCD: make and model 3 Maximum Arrest Force (lbf) Slide Distance 4 (inches) 300 Petzl RIG :30 Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, 5.5 B Petzl RIG :38 Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, 5.5 A Petzl RIG :00 PMI, EZ Bend, White with Red Tracer 5.5 A 0.18 Used rope Broke the plastic sleeve incorporated into the sewn termination attachment point on the drop test PMI, EZ Bend, White 5 12: B 0.18 with Red Tracer Broke the plastic sleeve incorporated into the sewn termination attachment point on the drop test 300 Petzl RIG Petzl RIG :18 PMI, EZ Bend, White with Red Tracer 5.5 A Petzl RIG :37 Petzl, Vector, Red 5.5 A Petzl RIG Tied figure 8 knot as opposed to a sewn termination attachment point. Knot was pretensioned with body weight prior to the drop. 8 12:42 Petzl, Vector, Red 5.5 B Petzl RIG Tied figure 8 knot as opposed to a sewn termination attachment point. Knot was pretensioned with body weight prior to the drop. 9 12:50 Petzl, Vector, Red 5.5 A 0.18 Figure 8 knot was same as #7 (i.e. not retied); it was cinched tightly by the force from test #7 300 Petzl RIG Bluewater, Dynastat, 10 13:52 "Difficult" release post-drop 6 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, 5.5 B SMC Spider Data Acquisition Rate: 2400 Hz Page 1 of 4
16 Helicopter Rappel Testing Yosemite National Park Date: Test # Time Rope Type: make, model,color Bluewater, Dynastat, 11 14:09 "Difficult" release post-drop 6 Rope Type: size, material & construction 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, ~ Rope in Service (feet) Rope End (A or B) Appendix A 2010, Rigging for Fall Factor A 0.18 Rappeller Total Rappeller Weight 2 (lbs.) DCD: make and model 3 Maximum Arrest Force (lbf) Slide Distance 4 (inches) 300 SMC Spider Bluewater, Dynastat, 12 14:17 "Difficult" release post-drop 6 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, 5.5 B SMC Spider PMI, EZ Bend, White 13 14:24 with Red Tracer "Difficult" release post-drop B SMC Spider PMI, EZ Bend, White 14 14:31 with Red Tracer "Difficult" release post-drop A SMC Spider PMI, EZ Bend, White 15 14:38 with Red Tracer "Difficult" release post-drop B SMC Spider :15 Petzl, Vector, Red "Extremely difficult" release 6 - required a hit with the hand 5.5 A SMC Spider :41 Petzl, Vector, Red "Difficult" release post-drop B SMC Spider :50 Petzl, Vector, Red "Difficult" release post-drop A SMC Spider mm, Nylon, Braid on 19 15:59 Sky Genie Braid fall=17" Used rope (appears quite old) (2007 model year) 12.5mm, Nylon, Braid on 20 16:11 Sky Genie Braid Same rope and same end (e.g. only 12 min. of relaxation time) 6 A A Sky Genie Sky Genie Data Acquisition Rate: 2400 Hz Page 2 of 4
17 Helicopter Rappel Testing Yosemite National Park Date: and Test # Time Rope Type: make, model,color Rope Type: size, material & construction PMI, EZ Bend, White 21 16:50 with Red Tracer 3 stacked devices Broke 2 Petzl RIG devices Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon 22 9:42 Blend, 3 stacked devices Through devices - 5'2" (after reeved); first drop of Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon 23 9:53 Blend, 3 stacked devices ~ Rope in Service 5 (feet) Appendix A 2010, Rigging for Rope End (A or B) 6 A Total: 6'4" 5'2" Total: 6'4" 5'2" B A Fall Factor 1 MNT 1 foot free fall MNT 1 foot free fall MNT 1 foot free fall Rappeller Total Rappeller Weight 2 (lbs.) DCD: make and model 3 Maximum Arrest Force (lbf) Slide Distance 4 (inches) 300 Petzl RIG 1502 negligible 300 SMC Spider SMC Spider PMI, EZ Bend, White 24 10:04 with Red Tracer 3 stacked devices Total: 6'4" 5'2" B MNT 1 foot free fall 300 SMC Spider Mis-Rig Bad Drop PMI, EZ Bend, White 26 10:23 with Red Tracer 3 stacked devices Total: 6'4" 5'2" B MNT 1 foot free fall 300 SMC Spider :34 Petzl, Vector, Red 3 stacked devices Total: 6'4" 5'2" A MNT 1 foot free fall 300 SMC Spider :43 Petzl, Vector, Red 3 stacked devices Total: 6'4" 5'2" B MNT 1 foot free fall 300 SMC Spider Lb. quick-release balast Cam re-engaged with weights still suspended - flawed test set-up PMI, EZ Bend, White 9'2" 0 - out of 30 14:00 A 300 SMC Spider 1506 MNT with Red Tracer (tensioned) control rapeller 63 Lb. quick-release balast; note: a 2-peak drop rapidly rappelled to a stop/bounce (first peak force) and then continued to rappel until the final stop (second peak force) Data Acquisition Rate: 2400 Hz Page 3 of 4
18 Heli Rappel Testing Yosemite National Park Date: Test # Time Rope Type: make, model,color Rope Type: size, material & construction 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, ~ Rope in Service (feet) Bluewater, Dynastat, 31 14:30 9'2" 63 Lb. quick-release balast; note: a 2-peak drop (similar to test #30) Rope End (A or B) A Appendix A 2010, Rigging for Fall Factor out of control rapeller Rappeller Total Rappeller Weight 2 (lbs.) DCD: make and model 3 Maximum Arrest Force (lbf) Slide Distance 4 (inches) 300 SMC Spider 1144 MNT Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon 32 15:32 Blend, 90m (18 lb.) weight as ballast at end of rope Rapid Rappel with sudden stop Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon 33 15:41 Blend, ~ 20 Feet A 0 D. Pope 216 SMC Spider MNT MNT ~ 20 Feet A 0 J. Ramsdell 162 SMC Spider MNT MNT 34 15:57 Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, ~ 20 Feet A 0 M. Stark 158 SMC Spider 270 MNT 35 15:59 Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, ~ 20 Feet A 0 D. Pope 216 SMC Spider 610 MNT 36 16:01 Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, ~ 20 Feet A 0 J. Ramsdell 162 SMC Spider 316 MNT 37 16:04 Bluewater, Dynastat, 11mm, Polyester/Nylon Blend, ~ 20 Feet A 0 K. Lober 188 SMC Spider 348 MNT PMI, EZ Bend, White 11mm, Polyester/Nylon 38 16:30 ~ 20 Feet B 0 D. Pope 216 SMC Spider 1012 MNT with Red Tracer Blend, Very fast descent. Pope became familiar with Spider after multiple rappels and indicated before the test that he could go "fast" Data Acquisition Rate: 2400 Hz Page 4 of 4
19 Appendix B Re.: Helicopter Rappel - Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC Footnotes 1 Drops resulting in a in a fall factor of.18 were produced by a 1 fall on 5 6 feet of rope in service; drops resulting in a fall factor of.24 were produced by a 1 5 fall on 6 of rope. 2 Total rappeller weight for consisted of a 184 lb. articulating mannequin and 116 lbs. of steel weight in a haul bag suspended from the mannequin. 3 The Petzl RIG DCD was pre-set in the locked position prior to each test. 4 Slide distance refers to the length of rope that travels through a DCD during a drop as a result of the force generated by a fall. This value was obtained by marking the rope prior to the drops with an indelible marker. 5 Two values are indicated for rope in service on drop tests # The 6 4 value is the total amount of rope. The 5 2 value accounts for the removal of the rope required to reeve the two stacked devices. 6 Releasability was determined by a subjective scale: Easy Release Moderately Difficult Release Difficult Release Extremely Difficult Release No resistance encountered when operator releases the device Operator must exert mild effort to release the device Operator must exert a significant though not necessarily prohibitive amount of force to release the device Operator must strike the handle of the device with a fist or open palm to release the device. Unless otherwise noted, all devices should be considered to fall under the category of an Easy Release. Key to Acronyms in Report Item Description mm lbs lbf DCD Hz MNT Millimeter Pounds Pounds force Descent Control Device Hertz Measurement Not Taken 2010, Rigging for Page 1 of 1
20 Appendix C Re.: Helicopter Rappel-Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC 1-Poor 2-Fair 3-Average 4-Good 5-Excellent Descent Control Device: Subjective Criteria Evaluation Form Device Petzl RIG Security [considerations: hands free, untensioned slip, incorrect loading fail safe] Rating Comments Hands Free (4); Untensioned Slip (?): Incorrect Loading (3); Stacked (1) Ease of Inspection [considerations: both the device and the tie-off] Rating 3 Comments Ease of Loading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating Comments Ease of Unloading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 2 Comments I struggled with it, but that may simply be familiarity. I could not get it off the rope easily. Ease of Use [considerations: smooth ride, easy to use with gloved hand, ergonomic handle, dexterity required] Rating Comments Ride (3); Handle was good (4); Ride depends on rope 2010, Rigging for Page 1 of 10
21 Appendix C Re.: Helicopter Rappel-Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC 1-Poor 2-Fair 3-Average 4-Good 5-Excellent Descent Control Device: Subjective Criteria Evaluation Form Device SMC Spider Security [considerations: hands free, untensioned slip, incorrect loading fail safe] Rating Comments Hands Free (4); Untensioned Slip (unk), did not observe this; incorrect loading fail safe (3); Behavior in a stack (4) anecdotal only. Ease of Inspection [considerations: both the device and the tie-off] Rating 3 Comments Ease of Loading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating Comments Loading(3); Removal (3) Ease of Unloading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 3 Comments Pin is easy to activate with glove on. Ease of Use [considerations: smooth ride, easy to use with gloved hand, ergonomic handle, dexterity required] Rating 4 Comments Ride (3); Handle was good (4); Ride depends on stiffness of rope. Stiffer was smoother (3); Hand position appears to be critical but controllable with training. 2010, Rigging for Page 2 of 10
22 Appendix C Re.: Helicopter Rappel-Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC 1-Poor 2-Fair 3-Average 4-Good 5-Excellent Descent Control Device: Subjective Criteria Evaluation Form Device SMC Spider Security [considerations: hands free, untensioned slip, incorrect loading fail safe] Rating 4 Comments On the Spider there was an untensioned slip when unloaded not having a locking feature was a disadvantage, but not critical. Great ability to stack (but unknown how difficult for the spotter or rappeller to move it up and down the rope would be). There was a slip of 2-3 on a hard stop but I though that was no problem and may help reduce forces like dynamic belay. Ease of Inspection [considerations: both the device and the tie-off] Rating 4 Comments Spider seems slightly easier [than the RIG] to inspect but not significantly. Good, easy diagrams on Spider faceplate. Not so with the RIG. Ease of Loading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 5 Comments I found the Spider much easier and more intuitive to load that the RIG. I for some reason could easily be confused for a few seconds on how to load the RIG. Ease of Unloading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 3 Comments Both devices were similar after a loaded rappel. However, one more step to was needed to remove the RIG removal from the redirect carabiner. I did find the RIG was slightly easier to open the plate, rather than having to manipulate the small detent pin. Pros and cons to both. About equal. Ease of Use [considerations: smooth ride, easy to use with gloved hand, ergonomic handle, dexterity required] Rating , Rigging for Page 3 of 10
23 Appendix C Comments The RIG was a smoother ride than the Spider. But that smooth ride related to the faster speed down the rope which was almost too fast. RIG was way too involved with rigging on the skid with the needed redirect carabiner. I thought this was a significant negative. I liked the strong feeling and all metal construction of the Spider vs. the plastic feeling of the RIG. Plus having seen us break the RIG (albeit in an unapproved stack) did not give me confidence. I liked the sweet spot better on the RIG. The handle angle on the Spider seemed unergonomical. I had difficulty with the over-cam slow down feature of the Spider, nearly hitting the ground too fast (but this was a training issue and me not understanding the feature.) This also may have been because the handle angle is difficult to get all the way into the over-cam slow down position. 2010, Rigging for Page 4 of 10
24 Appendix C Re.: Helicopter Rappel-Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC 1-Poor 2-Fair 3-Average 4-Good 5-Excellent Descent Control Device: Subjective Criteria Evaluation Form Device Petzl RIG Security [considerations: hands free, untensioned slip, incorrect loading fail safe] Rating 3 Comments On the Spider there was an untensioned slip when unloaded not having a locking feature was a disadvantage, but not critical. Great ability to stack (but unknown how difficult for the spotter or rappeller to move it up and down the rope would be). There was a slip of 2-3 on a hard stop but I though that was no problem and may help reduce forces like dynamic belay. Ease of Inspection [considerations: both the device and the tie-off] Rating 3 Comments Spider seems slightly easier [than the RIG] to inspect but not significantly. Good, easy diagrams on Spider faceplate. Not so with the RIG. Ease of Loading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 1-2 Comments I found the Spider much easier and more intuitive to load that the RIG. I for some reason could easily be confused for a few seconds on how to load the RIG. Ease of Unloading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 3 Comments Both devices were similar after a loaded rappel. However, one more step to was needed to remove the RIG removal from the redirect carabiner. I did find the RIG was slightly easier to open the plate, rather than having to manipulate the small detent pin. Pros and cons to both. About equal. Ease of Use [considerations: smooth ride, easy to use with gloved hand, ergonomic handle, dexterity required] Rating , Rigging for Page 5 of 10
25 Appendix C Comments The RIG was a smoother ride than the Spider. But that smooth ride related to the faster speed down the rope which was almost too fast. RIG was way too involved with rigging on the skid with the needed redirect carabiner. I thought this was a significant negative. I liked the strong feeling and all metal construction of the Spider vs. the plastic feeling of the RIG. Plus having seen us break the RIG (albeit in an unapproved stack) did not give me confidence. I liked the sweet spot better on the RIG. The handle angle on the Spider seemed unergonomical. I had difficulty with the over-cam slow down feature of the Spider, nearly hitting the ground too fast (but this was a training issue and me not understanding the feature.) This also may have been because the handle angle is difficult to get all the way into the over-cam slow down position. 2010, Rigging for Page 6 of 10
26 Appendix C Re.: Helicopter Rappel-Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC 1-Poor 2-Fair 3-Average 4-Good 5-Excellent Descent Control Device: Subjective Criteria Evaluation Form Device Petzl RIG Security [considerations: hands free, untensioned slip, incorrect loading fail safe] Rating 4 Comments Lock-off feature Ease of Inspection [considerations: both the device and the tie-off] Rating 3 Comments Difficult to rig, face loading diagram different than inside diagram. Ease of Loading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 5 Comments Very easy to use with gloved hand, easy to come off. Ease of Unloading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 4 Comments Easy to remove on a weighted rope. Ease of Use [considerations: smooth ride, easy to use with gloved hand, ergonomic handle, dexterity required] Rating 5 Comments Runs very smoothly, easy to control. 2010, Rigging for Page 7 of 10
27 Appendix C Re.: Helicopter Rappel-Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC 1-Poor 2-Fair 3-Average 4-Good 5-Excellent Descent Control Device: Subjective Criteria Evaluation Form Device SMC Spider Security [considerations: hands free, untensioned slip, incorrect loading fail safe] Rating 4 Comments No incorrect loading fail safe. Ease of Inspection [considerations: both the device and the tie-off] Rating 4 Comments easy to inspect Ease of Loading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 4 Comments Ease of Unloading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 4 Comments Detent pin difficult to open with gloved hand, hard to slide open faceplate. Ease of Use [considerations: smooth ride, easy to use with gloved hand, ergonomic handle, dexterity required] Rating 4 Comments 2010, Rigging for Page 8 of 10
28 Appendix C Re.: Helicopter Rappel-Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC 1-Poor 2-Fair 3-Average 4-Good 5-Excellent Descent Control Device: Subjective Criteria Evaluation Form Device Petzl RIG Security [considerations: hands free, untensioned slip, incorrect loading fail safe] Rating 1 Comments 1 because the device did not perform well in a stacked configuration. However, other factors were comparable to Spider. Ease of Inspection [considerations: both the device and the tie-off] Rating 4 Comments Ease of Loading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 2 Comments I disliked the need to have an additional carabiner as a redirect. Ease of Unloading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 3 Comments Similar to Spider. However, additional redirect carabiner creates an extra step. Ease of Use [considerations: smooth ride, easy to use with gloved hand, ergonomic handle, dexterity required] Rating 2+ Comments RIG handle was smaller. Plastic handle seemed to be less robust. However, ride was smooth. I liked the position of the handle when in use, position was superior to the Spider. 2010, Rigging for Page 9 of 10
29 Appendix C Re.: Helicopter Rappel-Equipment Testing and Evaluation Location: Crane Flat Helibase; Yosemite, CA Date(s): October 28-30, 2010 Testing Contractor: Rigging for, LLC 1-Poor 2-Fair 3-Average 4-Good 5-Excellent Descent Control Device: Subjective Criteria Evaluation Form Device SMC Spider Security [considerations: hands free, untensioned slip, incorrect loading fail safe] Rating 4 Comments Ease of Inspection [considerations: both the device and the tie-off] Rating 4 Comments Ran straight from device to anchor, seemed intuitive. Did not test the tie-off Ease of Loading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 4 Comments Would like to test stacked configuration. I think loading devices mid-flight might present future operator error concerns. Ease of Unloading [considerations: speed and simplicity, removal from attachment point on Rating 3-4 Comments seemed OK. Detent pin was OK to remove with gloved hand. Ease of Use [considerations: smooth ride, easy to use with gloved hand, ergonomic handle, dexterity required] Rating 3+ Comments Semi-smooth ride. Like handle design, however, dislike how far handle needed to be pulled before panic would slow down descent. 2010, Rigging for Page 10 of 10
Slow-Pull Testing Of The "Double Overhand On Itself" Tie.
Slow-Pull Testing Of The "Double Overhand On Itself" Tie. by Collin O'Neill Introduction Over the past few years of my caving experience I have witnessed several cavers using an unconventional knot on
More informationIn Quest of the Holy Grail. Presented By. Gregory L. Churchman
In Quest of the Holy Grail Presented By Gregory L. Churchman The Quest It all began with the ISC Sarab. They sent me one because I was looking for a reversible descent control device, that would work with
More informationImportant / remember. Accessing the edge of the crevasse to evaluate the situation
MICRO TRAXION EXPERIENCE This «Product Experience» document is a supplement to the Instructions For Use, which provides feedback from field experience and tips for using your product. It is inseparable
More informationObjectives (1 of 3) List at least two types of materials and designs used in rope manufacture. Define and describe the following: Dynamic rope Static
Chapter 16 Rescue Objectives (1 of 3) List at least two types of materials and designs used in rope manufacture. Define and describe the following: Dynamic rope Static rope Webbing List at least five rules
More informationParallel Plaquettes: A lightweight rope rescue system using common climbing equipment
: A lightweight rope rescue system using common climbing equipment Presented to: The International Technical Rescue Symposium November 6-8, 2009 Pueblo, Colorado USA Presented by: Mike Gibbs Rigging for
More informationASAP Experience. Important / remember. Failure to heed any of these warnings may result in severe injury or death.
Marcos Ferro ASAP Experience This Product Experience document is a supplement to the Instructions For Use, which provides feedback from field experience and tips for using your product It is inseparable
More informationDAISY CHAINS AND OTHER LANYARDS: Some Shocking Results when Shock Loaded
DAISY CHAINS AND OTHER LANYARDS: Some Shocking Results when Shock Loaded Presented to: The International Technical Rescue Symposium November 25 Ft. Collins, CO USA Presented by: Mike Gibbs Ouray, Colorado
More informationSQWUREL Testing, Certifications and Quality Control
SQWUREL Testing, Certifications and Quality Control This document outlines thoughts on testing, certification, quality control and defines BG Gear test methods. This document also contains a section describing
More informationNational Cave Rescue Commission Level 3 Student Preparation Guide
National Cave Rescue Commission Level 3 Student Preparation Guide NCRC requires all students demonstrate basic skills prior to participation. Level 3 students will be tested on knot tying, single rope
More informationRESCUE BELAYS: Important Considerations for Long Lowers
RESCUE BELAYS: Important Considerations for Long Lowers Presented to: The International Technical Rescue Symposium November 2-4, 2007 Golden, Colorado USA Presented by: Mike Gibbs Rigging for Rescue Ouray,
More informationNational Cave Rescue Commission Level 3 Student Preparation Guide
National Cave Rescue Commission Level 3 Student Preparation Guide NCRC requires all students demonstrate basic skills prior to participation. Level 3 students will be tested on knot tying, single rope
More informationUser Instruction Manual Fixed Beam Anchor
Instructions for the following series products: FIXED BEAM ANCHOR Model Numbers: The Ultimate in Fall Protection 2108406 2108407 2108408 2108409 2108410 2108411 User Instruction Manual Fixed Beam Anchor
More informationASAP Experience. Important / remember. Failure to heed any of these warnings may result in severe injury or death.
Marcos Ferro ASAP Experience This Product Experience document is a supplement to the Instructions For Use, which provides feedback from field experience and tips for using your product It is inseparable
More informationUSER S MANUAL V3.0. MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE Pulley Descent Control Belay
USER S MANUAL V3.0 MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE Pulley Descent Control Belay MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE Pulley Descent Control Belay Thank you for selecting the CMC MPD for your technical rope rescue systems. Truly
More informationUSER S MANUAL MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE. Pulley l Descent Control l Belay V2.3. cmcrescue.com (800) Goleta, CA USA
Pulley l Descent Control l Belay MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE V2.3 USER S MANUAL 6740 Cortona Drive Goleta, CA 93117 USA support@cmcrescue.com (800) 235-5741 cmcrescue.com Control No. MAN - 3330X0 Rev 00 MULTI-PURPOSE
More informationNational Cave Rescue Commission 1. Level 2 Student Preparation Guide
National Cave Rescue Commission Level 2 Student Preparation Guide NCRC requires all students to demonstrate basic skills prior to participation. Level 2 students must be able to tie the knots listed below,
More informationUser Instructions 1789 Parapet Wall Anchor
User Instructions 1789 Parapet Wall Anchor This manual is intended to meet the Manufacturer Instructions as required by ANSI Z359.1 and should be used as part of an employee training program as required
More informationInternational Technical Rescue Symposium Presented by John McKently
Some of the factors affecting pulley efficiency in theoretical and real world rescue systems. International Technical Rescue Symposium Presented by John McKently 2011 It is generally accepted that pulleys
More informationUser Instruction Manual Fixed Beam Anchor
User Instruction Manual Fixed Beam Anchor This manual is intended to meet the Manufacturer s Instructions as required by ANSI Z359.1 and ANSI A10.14, and should be used as part of an employee training
More informationReliance Industries, LLC Operating instructions for the / Bolt-on D-Ring Anchorage. Model # 3071
Reliance Industries, LLC Operating instructions for the 3071-1 / 3071-2 Bolt-on D-Ring Anchorage Model # 3071 Reliance Industries, LLC PO Box 140008 Denver, CO 80214 Ph. (800) 488-5751 Ph. (303) 424-8650
More informationUSER S MANUAL V2.2. MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE Pulley Descent Control Belay
USER S MANUAL V2.2 MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE Pulley Descent Control Belay 6740 Cortona Drive Goleta, CA 93117 USA support@cmcrescue.com (800) 235-5741 cmcrescue.com 3330X0.00.101413 WARNING MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE
More informationLifecycle Performance of Escape Systems
Lifecycle Performance of Escape Systems A look at laboratory vs field conditioning of aramid fiber based escape systems. By James Hunter, Cedric Smith, Ole Kils and Tyler Mayer for ITRS 2018 1.1 Introduction
More informationRANDALL S ADVENTURE TRAINING BASIC SINGLE ROPE TECHNIQUES
BASIC SINGLE ROPE TECHNIQUES SINGLE ROPE TECHNIQUES An introductory course in the use of single rope techniques (SRT) for rappelling and ascending in a wilderness environment. This is a basic outline for
More informationNational Cave Rescue Commission Level 3 Student Preparation Guide
National Cave Rescue Commission Level 3 Student Preparation Guide NCRC requires all students demonstrate basic skills prior to participation. Level 3 students will be tested on knot tying, single rope
More informationNational Cave Rescue Commission Instructor Qualification Skills Preparation Guide
National Cave Rescue Commission Instructor Qualification Skills Preparation Guide As a potential NCRC instructor you are expected to possess the basic skills necessary to teach students at any level within
More informationBuckingham Mfg. Co., Inc. OX BLOCK TM Instructions and Warnings
OVERVIEW The Buckingham OX BLOCK is a rope snatch block with an integrated friction bar used for lowering loads, snubbing loads, and raising loads. It allows the rigging professional to handle loads with
More informationPetzl Pirana a Canyoneer s Rappelling Tool
Petzl Pirana a Canyoneer s Rappelling Tool Pirana Basics The Pirana is a Figure Eight based Rappel Device made by Petzl specifically for canyoneering. It has several friction settings, so the correct friction
More informationIHRG Appendix B Model Specific Rappel/ Cargo Configuration B.1 Bell 205/210/212/214B/412 Rappel/ Cargo Configuration
B.1 Bell 205/210/212/214B/412 Rappel/ Cargo Configuration B.1.1 Aircraft Rappel Configuration a. Remove right side of (5) persons forward facing seat. b. Right side door post installed c. Approved cargo
More informationB O N N E V I L L E C O U N T Y S H E R I F F S SEARCH & RESCUE
TECHNICAL ROPE RESCUE QUICK REFERENCE Version 1.2 as of February 13, 2010 Technical rope rescue work is inherently dangerous. Risk is reduced by having the proper training and equipment, which allows employment
More informationb
Empirically Derived Breaking Strengths for Basket Hitches and Wrap Three Pull Two Webbing Anchors Thomas Evans a and Aaron Stavens b a Montana State University, Department of Earth Sciences, PO Box 173480,
More informationAnchor Systems: S P E C I A L O P E R A T I O N S : R O P E R E S C U E : A N C H O R S Y S T E M S ( 1. 1 )
S P E C I A L O P E R A T I O N S : R O P E R E S C U E : A N C H O R S Y S T E M S ( 1. 1 ) Author: Jason Tanner October 2015 Version 1.0 Anchor Systems NFPA 1670, 1006 T A S K S K I L L D E S C R I P
More informationRope friendly stainless steel cam Tether attachment point (2mm diameter cord) for drop-free installation and removal
- CTC 100 Product Info Sheet Rope Adjustment Device Conforms to EN 12841:2006 A (Expert Use Only) Hot forged aluminium body Large attachment eye for multiple connections Rope friendly stainless steel cam
More informationLevel 1 Student Preparation Guide
National Cave Rescue Commission Level Student Preparation Guide NCRC requires all students to demonstrate basic skills prior to participation. Level students must be able to tie the knots listed below
More informationCalculating Forces in the Pulley Mechanical Advantage Systems Used in Rescue Work By Ralphie G. Schwartz, Esq
Calculating Forces in the Pulley Mechanical Advantage Systems Used in Rescue Work By Ralphie G. Schwartz, Esq Introduction If you have not read the companion article: Understanding Mechanical Advantage
More informationZIGZAG Experience. Important / remember. Failure to heed any of these warnings may result in severe injury or death.
A. Childeric / Copalme ZIGZAG Experience This "Product Experience" document is a supplement to the Instructions For Use, which provides feedback from field experience and tips for using your product It
More informationPresented to the International Technical Rescue Symposium, November Abstract
Presented to the International Technical Rescue Symposium, November 21 Presented by: Chuck Weber, PMI Quality Manager Abstract This paper presents the results of 162 individual drop tests performed at
More informationUser Instructions 1790 Rail Anchor
User Instructions 1790 Rail Anchor This document is intended to meet the Manufacturer s Instruction requirements as stated by ANSI Z359.1, and should be used as part of an employee training program as
More informationb
Empirically Derived Breaking Strengths for Basket Hitches and Wrap Three Pull Two Webbing Anchors Thomas Evans a and Aaron Stavens b a Montana State University, Department of Earth Sciences, PO Box 173480,
More informationRIGGERS SAFETY SAFETY IS IN THE DETAILS FULL LINE CATALOG
RIGGERS SAFETY SAFETY IS IN THE DETAILS FULL LINE CATALOG Riggers Safety is a California-based manufacturer of Personal Fall Arrest Systems (PFAS) and Fall Prevention Products. Our automated manufacturing
More informationOverview (key points)
Topic / Subject TYPE 1 FALL-ARREST DEVICES Time frame = mins Contact statement (gain student attention and create a readiness to learn) Overview (key points) Purpose -Fall-arrest devices are designed to
More informationRIGGERS SAFETY SAFETY IS IN THE DETAILS FULL LINE CATALOG
RIGGERS SAFETY SAFETY IS IN THE DETAILS FULL LINE CATALOG Riggers Safety is a California-based manufacturer of Personal Fall Arrest Systems (PFAS) and Fall Prevention Products. Our automated manufacturing
More informationOperating instructions. Bolt-on Bar Joist Anchorage
Reliance Industries, LLC Operating instructions for the Bolt-on Bar Joist Anchorage Model # 3072 Reliance Industries, LLC PO Box 140008 Denver, CO 80214 Ph. (800) 488-5751 Ph. (303) 424-8650 Fax (303)
More informationPART #1 - Sharp Edge Testing
The Effects of a Sharp Edge and an Oxyfuel Cutting Process upon Flexible, Torsionally Balanced Structures of Dissimilar Fiber Types International Technical Rescue Symposium November 1-4, 21, Portland,
More informationRescue Technician: Rope Rescue I
Rescue Technician: Rope Rescue I Skill Sheet Package Based on NFPA 1006: Standard for Technical Rescue Professional Qualifications, 2013 Edition. Alabama Fire College August 2016 REVISED 02/10/2017 Alabama
More informationCompact headlamp with white or red/green/blue lighting to preserve night vision and ensure stealth. 250 lumens
TACTIKKA +RGB Compact headlamp with white or red/green/blue lighting to preserve night vision and ensure stealth. 250 lumens Designed for occasional use, the multi-beam TACTIKKA + RGB headlamp offers 250
More informationHeavy climbers beware! Page 1 of 8
Heavy climbers beware! Page 1 of 8 To my fellow 176 pound (80 kg) and up climbers, please continue reading! You can consider yourself a heavy climber for the purposes of this article. To those of you in
More informationEXIT WINDOW USING PERSONAL SAFETY SYSTEM (PSS) WITH REMOTE ANCHOR
October 1, 2007 EXIT WINDOW USING PERSONAL SAFETY SYSTEM (PSS) WITH REMOTE ANCHOR 1. EQUIPMENT Personal Harness and Personal Safety System. 2. OBJECTIVE To enable a firefighter to remove themselves from
More informationCausal Mechanisms of Webbing Anchor Interface Failure Thomas Evans a, Sherrie McConaughey b, and Aaron Stavens c
Causal Mechanisms of Webbing Anchor Interface Failure Thomas Evans a, Sherrie McConaughey b, and Aaron Stavens c a Montana State University, Department of Earth Sciences, PO Box 173480, Bozeman, MT 59717-3480,
More informationCOMPACT. VERSATILE. SAFE.
NANO-LOK SELF RETRACTING LIFELINES ONLY 1.6 POUNDS! COMPACT. VERSATILE. SAFE. REPLACE YOUR LANYARD TO REDUCE FALL DISTANCE AND IMPROVE SAFETY. Model Shown 3101211 THE ULTIMATE IN FALL PROTECTION PRODUCT
More informationWe put it all on the line, so you don t have to.
3M DBI-SALA 8 mm Permanent Horizontal Lifeline Systems We put it all on the line, so you don t have to. Smarter software. Stronger hardware. Easier installation. How do you improve on one of the best permanent
More informationWARNING! DO NOT THROW AWAY THESE INSTRUCTIONS! READ AND UNDERSTAND BEFORE USING EQUIPMENT!
Guardian Fall Protection Kent, WA 800-466-6385 www.guardianfall.com GENERAL SYSTEM SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection of fall protection shall be made by a Competent Person. All fall protection equipment shall
More informationNew Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology. Fall Protection Program
New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology Fall Protection Program REGULATORY STANDARDS: OSHA - 29 CFR 1910.66 29 CFR 1910.128, 129, 130, 131, (Proposed) 29 CFR 1926.104 29 CFR 1926.500 BASIS: Approximately
More informationLOW ANGLE ROPE RESCUE OPERATIONAL
Chapter 8: Three Main Components of a Rope Rescue System Chapter 8: Three Main Components of a Rope Rescue System Scope: This chapter serves as an orientation to the three main components of a rope rescue
More informationFALL RANGE PROTECTION
FALL PROTECTION RANGE PS53 544 FP19 506 Fall Protection is put in place to prevent the risks associated with falling from heights, reducing impact force, restricting obstacle/ground collision and restricting
More informationCOPYRIGHT 2016 RANDALL S ADVENTURE TRAINING RANDALL S ADVENTURE & TRAINING TACTICAL ROPE ACCESS
COPYRIGHT 2016 RANDALL S ADVENTURE & TRAINING COPYRIGHT 2014 COURSE PURPOSE This course is designed to enable law enforcement the ability to select duty grade vertical rope access hardware, and set up
More informationYosemite National Park Operating Plan High Angle Technical Procedures for Short-haul and Hoist Document Overview and Important Principles
Abstract Yosemite National Park has long been recognized as an international climbing destination. The quality, size, and accessibility of the rock faces in Yosemite draw thousands of climbers yearly.
More informationUser Instructions Series Descent Device
User Instructions - 199 Series Descent Device This document serves as the Manufacturer s Instructions, and is to be used as part of an employee training program for the system, as required by OSHA. ATTENTION:
More informationOccupational Protective Equipment
Introduction One of the leading occupational dangers in today s workforce is the risk of death or injury due to falls. Falls from ladders, scaffolds, buildings, or other elevations have become the second
More informationThe Impact of Extreme Fire Behavior on Firefighter Escape Systems
The Impact of Extreme Fire Behavior on Firefighter Escape Systems International Technical Rescue Symposium November 3-6, 2016, Albuquerque, NM Mike Forbes, RopeCraft Matt Hunt & Josh Walls, Sterling Overview
More informationZIGZAG Experience. Important / remember. Failure to heed any of these warnings may result in severe injury or death.
A. Childeric / Copalme ZIGZAG Experience This "Product Experience" document is a supplement to the Instructions For Use, which provides feedback from field experience and tips for using your product It
More information2009 Summit Harness 1 INDEX INSTRUCTIONS WARNING
2009 Summit Harness WHEN HUNTING FROM A TREESTAND FALLS CAUSING INJURY OR DEATH CAN OCCUR ANY TIME AFTER LEAVING THE GROUND FOR THOSE REASONS ALWAYS WEAR A FALL ARREST SYSTEM (FAS) COMPRISING A FULL BODY
More informationSecurity and confidence at height.
A Security and confidence at height. Vertical Systems DISTRIBUTED BY M DBI-SALA Vertical Systems are designed to complement your ability to work while meeting all applicable OSHA and ANSI standards. Vertical
More informationLOW ANGLE ROPE RESCUE OPERATIONAL
Scope: This chapter serves as an introduction to system attachments and fall restraint. Terminal Learning Objective (TLO): At the end of this chapter, the student will be aware of several methods of system
More information"RIGGING SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTS"
PRESENTER'S GUIDE "RIGGING SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTS" Part of the "CONSTRUCTION SAFETY KIT" Series Quality Safety and Health Products, for Today...and Tomorrow OUTLINE OF MAJOR PROGRAM POINTS
More informationCONTRACT RESEARCH REPORT. Industrial rope access - Investigation into items of personal protective equipment HSE
HSE Health & Safety Executive Industrial rope access - Investigation into items of personal protective equipment Prepared by Lyon Equipment Limited for the Health and Safety Executive CONTRACT RESEARCH
More informationBuckingham Mfg. Co., Inc. OX BLOCK TM Instructions and Warnings
OVERVIEW The Buckingham OX BLOCK is a rope snatch block with an integrated friction bar used for lowering loads, snubbing loads, and raising loads. It allows the rigging professional to handle loads with
More informationWARNING! DO NOT THROW AWAY THESE INSTRUCTIONS! READ AND UNDERSTAND BEFORE USING EQUIPMENT!
Guardian Fall Protection Kent, WA 800-466-6385 www.guardianfall.com GENERAL SYSTEM SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection of fall protection shall be made by a Competent Person. All fall protection equipment shall
More informationRescue Core Prerequisites NFPA 1006, Chapter 5, 2008 Skills Completion
NFPA 1006, Chapter 5, 2008 Skills Completion Name: Overall Score: Pass Fail Incomplete Class Number: Lead Instructor Signature Skill Number Skill NFPA 1006 Chapter 5 Objective Pass/Fail (Evaluating Instructor
More informationUSER S MANUAL V2.1. MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE Pulley l Rescue Belay l Descent Control
USER S MANUAL V2.1 MULTI-PURPOSE DEVICE Pulley l Rescue Belay l Descent Control PO Box 6870 Santa Barbara, CA 93160-6870 USA support@cmcrescue.com (800) 235-5741 cmcrescue.com 3330X0.00.041213 MULTI-PURPOSE
More informationAt the end of this presentation you should know the difference between fall prevention, fall restraint, and fall arrest.
0 At the end of this presentation you should know the difference between fall prevention, fall restraint, and fall arrest. We will review the hazards associated with fall protection and how to mitigate
More informationSafe Work Practices (SWP) SWP (6) FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM
SWP (6) FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM The following information on Fall Protection has been based around the BC OHS Regulations, standards, policies and guidelines. Prior to starting work outside of BC, the
More informationNotes On Ice Pro and Basic Ice Climbing Technique. Jerry Heilman. 2015
Notes On Ice Pro and Basic Ice Climbing Technique. Jerry Heilman. 2015 Chris Harmston, MSE. Myths, Cautions and Techniques of Ice Screw Placement. 1997. Black Diamond Quality Control Labs The ice used
More informationESCONDIDO FIRE DEPT TRAINING MANUAL Section ENGINE MODULE Page 1 of 14 IRIC/RIC Downed Firefighter Removal Revised
ENGINE MODULE Page 1 of 14 DOWNED FIREFIGHTER REMOVAL Moving the Downed Firefighter: Carries and Drags The process of rescuing a downed firefighter can become extensive and may involve multiple decisions
More informationSemper Salus! CERT Disclaimer 3/4/2014. Lamorinda Community Emergency Response Team. Safety is Always the Number One Priority!
Lamorinda Community Emergency Response Team Rescue Ropes, Anchors and Knots Semper Salus! Safety is Always the Number One Priority! CERT Disclaimer This 2 hour presentation will NOT qualify you to perform
More informationEQUIPMENT COST REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES
Purpose: Scope: To describe the process for fire departments in the Technical High Angle Rope Rescue Program to be reimbursed for initial equipment purchase costs. This policy refers to the equipment purchase
More informationTying Off A Belay Plate And Rescuing A Fallen Climber A Sequential Article to Accompany Instruction
Tying Off A Belay Plate And Rescuing A Fallen Climber A Sequential Article to Accompany Instruction version 1.2 2002, 2005 Cyril Shokoples Rescue Dynamics 5109 17A Avenue NW Edmonton, AB T6L 1K5 www.rescuedynamics.ca
More informationBC Shackle. Made in the China. Alloy Steel Anchor Shackle. Instructions for handling and use - Please read in full before using this device
BC Shackle Made in the China Alloy Steel Anchor Shackle Instructions for handling and use - Please read in full before using this device Index 1.) Introduction 2.) Warnings / General Use Guidelines 3.)
More informationIce Axe-Boot belay Freedom of the Hills p. 350 Watch:
Carabiner-Ice Axe Belay Freedom of the Hills pp.358-359 Watch: http://bit.ly/carabinericeaxebelay Also called the stomper belay, the carabiner-ice axe belay provides better security than a boot-axe belay
More informationRESOURCE; IFSTA ESSENTIALS OF FIREFIGHTING 4 TH AND 5 TH EDITION
RESOURCE; IFSTA ESSENTIALS OF FIREFIGHTING 4 TH AND 5 TH EDITION 1 DIFFERENT TYPES OF ROPE CONSTRUCTION /CLASIFICATIONS PROPER CARE OF YOUR ROPE RECORD KEEPING AND STORAGE OF ROPES SEVERAL KNOTS USED IN
More informationUSER S INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR THE INSTALLATION, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE OF THE GUARDIAN TEMPORARY HORIZONTAL LIFELINE SYSTEM
USER S INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR THE INSTALLATION, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE OF THE GUARDIAN 04630 TEMPORARY HORIZONTAL LIFELINE SYSTEM 1 WARNING This is a design compatible component for a comprehensive Guardian
More informationInstructor Guide. Session Reference: 1. Topic: Ropes, Knots, and Rigging. Level of Instruction: Time Required: Three Hours
Rescue Refresher Instructor Guide Session Reference: 1 Topic: Ropes, Knots, and Rigging Level of Instruction: Time Required: Three Hours Materials: 25 foot length of rope for each student webbing, harnesses,
More informationSECTION FACILITY FALL PROTECTION PART I - GENERAL
SECTION 11 24 29 - FACILITY FALL PROTECTION PART I - GENERAL 1.1 The Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) regulates fall protection for general industry and construction in the public sector under the Illinois
More informationHARNESSES / Available in S, M, L & XL
WINTER 2018 Tools & Safety Equipment for the Rope Access Worker VOL. 1 HARNESSES / Available in S, M, L & XL S1 Safety Harness 66772 The S1 Safety harness was designed by the experts at Safety One Training
More informationITRS 2014 By: Kirk Mauthner, British Columbia, Canada,
Abstract: Most rope rescuers are aware or familiar with the concept of applying a safety factor - such as 10:1 to their rigging with the aim of ensuring sufficient system strength just in case it becomes
More information1.2 LIMITATIONS: Consider the following application limitations before using this equipment:
User Instruction Manual Standing Seam Roof Anchor This manual is intended to meet the Manufacturer s Instructions, and should be used as part of an employee training program as required by OSHA. Figure
More information3 KNOTS 3.1 INTRODUCTION
3 KNOTS 3.1 INTRODUCTION Termination knots enable a termination to be made at any point along the rope s length. Most create loops, which are then used to attach the rope to anchors. Exceptions are: firstly,
More informationFigure 1 - Parts Identification. Copyright 2002, DB Industries, Inc.
User Instruction Manual Zorbit Energy Absorber Kits for Horizontal Lifeline Systems This manual is provided as the Maunfacturer s Instructions, and should be used as part of an employee training program
More informationFall Protection Introduction
Fall Protection Introduction Date: District: Site: Time: Department: Manager/Supervisor Name: In 1995, 1,048 construction workers died on the job, with 32 percent, or 335 of them, resulting from falls.
More informationKITSAP MOUNTAINEERS BASIC CLIMBING COURSE
Basic Rock & Glacier Climbing Course Kitsap Mountaineers KITSAP MOUNTAINEERS BASIC CLIMBING COURSE Class #2 and Field Trip #2 Kitsap Basic Climbing Course Class 5 and Field Trips 6 & 7-1 BASIC CLIMBING
More informationSQWUREL. Variable Friction Descender for Canyoneering
SQWUREL Variable Friction Descender for Canyoneering Made in UTAH, USA 7075 T6 Aluminum DIM: 6.539 x 3.781 x 0.375 Inches Weight: 4.4 Ounces Patent Pending Single Rope: 8mm - 11mm Double Rope: 8mm - 9mm
More informationMichel Beal. Explanation of rope characteristics & impact force or What do the numbers mean on rope instructions? CEO Beal Ropes
Explanation of rope characteristics & impact force or What do the numbers mean on rope instructions? Michel Beal CEO Beal Ropes 1 Topics Mass per metre Diameter Length Sheath slippage Static elongation
More informationUser Manual 1792 Standing Seam Metal Roof Retractable Swivel Anchor
1 User Manual 1792 Standing Seam Metal Roof Retractable Swivel Anchor This manual is intended to meet the Manufacturer Instructions as required by ANSI Z359.1 and should be used as part of an employee
More informationUSER MANUAL Do not throw away these instructions. Read and understand these instructions prior to use of the Lad Grab Safety System.
PRODUCT NAME: LAD GRAB Patent Pending PART NUMBERS: *LAD GRAB2TOPBRACKET, *LAD GRAB2CABLEGUIDE, *LAD GRAB2BOTTOMBRACKET, & CABLE3/8AIRCRAFT USER MANUAL Do not throw away these instructions. Read and understand
More informationUnderstanding Anchor Systems
This paper, is the first in a series of documents, intended to serve as a knowledge base for our department. Each paper in the series, is intended to cover, in depth, a topic critical to rope rescue. While
More informationRescue Ladder Model: KT ft (5.48m)
Rescue Ladder Model: KT36164 18ft (5.48m) IMPORTANT!!! ALL PERSONS USING THIS EQUIPMENT MUST READ AND UNDERSTAND ALL INSTRUCTIONS. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH. USERS SHOULD BE
More informationPulley-carabiner that facilitates installation of the rope when pulley is connected to the anchor
Petzl Rollclip Pulley-carabiner that facilitates installation of the rope when pulley is connected to the anchor ROLLCLIP A is a pulley-carabiner with a gate opening on the pulley side that facilitates
More informationArmy Mountain Warfare School Ethan Allen Firing Range Jericho, VT Military Mountaineer Course Knot Guide
Army Mountain Warfare School Ethan Allen Firing Range Jericho, VT 05465-9796 Military Mountaineer Course Knot Guide 2 - Basic Knot Tying 071E9002 INTRODUCTION: There are many knots used in mountaineering.
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR USE
INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE 88004X Series D-Ring Extender 5000 lb Rated Connector Complies with ANSI Z359.1-1998, ANSI 10.14 and OSHA 1926 regulations and requirements. Reliance Industries P.O. Box 2046 Deer
More informationTransfer Chain (SA-1002) & Adjustable I-Beam Clamp (SA-1039 or SA-1040) Operating Instructions
Transfer Chain (SA-1002) & Adjustable I-Beam Clamp (SA-1039 or SA-1040) Operating Instructions SPIDER Page 1 of 8 702127 Rev A Using Transfer Chain with Adjustable I-Beam Clamp Safety Notes Do not use
More informationLOW ANGLE ROPE RESCUE OPERATIONAL
Scope: This chapter serves as an introduction to anchor systems. Terminal Learning Objective (TLO): At the end of this chapter, the student will be aware of anchor selection and anchor system construction.
More information