Prof. Sergey Shibaev Kaliningrad State Techical University

Transcription

1 Prof. Sergey Shibaev Kaliningrad State Techical University

2 млн.т.

3 million tons Russian catch Alaska pollock Various squids nei Round sardinella Pink(=Humpback)salmon Pacific saury Pacific herring Pacific cod Japanese pilchard Jack and horse mackerels nei Flatfishes nei European pilchard(=sardine) Chub mackerel Chilean jack mackerel Capelin Cape horse mackerel Blue whiting(=poutassou) Black and Caspian Sea sprat Atlantic herring Atlantic cod Alaska pollock(=walleye poll) 3

4 Development of management Ministry of Fishing Industry State Committee of Fishery of RF Ministry of Agriculture with - Fishery Agency (Management) - FitoSanitary Control Federal Agency for Fisheries (separated) 2012 Ministry of Agriculture with - Fishery Agency (Management) 4

5 Fishery legislation Low On Fishery and Protection of Water Bioresources (2004, 2007, 2008, 2009) (LoFP WBR) Low On Aquaculture Low on recreation fishery (under consideration) Low On Animal World (1995, 2006, 2007) (LoAW) Water Code (2006, 2008) Basin Fishery Regulation (2006, 2008) (BFR) Supported legislative documents Orders of President Orders of Government Orders of Federal Fishery Agency 5

6 Types of WBR Water bio-resources all animals and plants 1. WBR object of fisheries (about 300 species) (Low fisheries and protection of WBR) 1.1. TAC species (178 species) 1.2. non TAC species 1.3. High value species 2. WBR non fisheries species (Low on Animal World) 2.1. Red Book species 2.2. Others 6

7 Implementation of regulation Water bio-resorces TAC species Non TAC species TAC Adaptation Yield Adaptation TAC Application Yield Application 7

8 Procedure of TAC adaptation 1. Scientific stocks assessment 2. Calculation of TAC 3. Approval by Regional Scientific Council 4. Public Consideration 5. State Ecological Expertise (Ministry of Nuclear, Ecological and Technical Control) 6. Approval by Federal Fishery Agency (Order) 7. Approval by Ministry of Justice TAC became a Low! 8Two years

9 Procedure of Possible Yield adaptation for non-tac species 1. Scientific stocks assessment 2. Calculation of PY 3. Approval by Regional Scientific Council 4. Approval by Federal Fishery Agency (Order) 5. Approval by Ministry of Justice PY became a Low! 9

10 Application of TAC approach Approval of TAC for each stock unit by Fishery Agency Dividing of TAC to Quotas Commercial Coastal Scientific Aquaculture Commercial Quota Distribution to companies in proportion with Share by Permission Every company operates within its individual quota 10

11 Application of non-tac approach Approval of PY for each stock unit by Fishery Agency Every company can get a permission for whole PY (Olympic system) Every company can catch as much as possible Every company reports about total catch every 5 days When 70% of PY is used Territorial branch adopts a decision about farther steps 11

12 6. Fisheries control and monitoring 12

13 Fisheries monitoring Before 2004 Cadastre of gears Effort Species composition of catch Length structure of catch Bycatch of small fishes Bycatch of non target species CPUE Position 15-days reports Logbooks After 2004 Cadastre of gears Logbooks 5-days reports

14 Fishery management Permitting Reporting and monitoring Restriction 14

15 Permission A document providing right for extraction of WBR Contents User of WBR Period and Fishing district Vessel (main and supported) List of gears List of WBR with individual quotas 15

16 Fisheries control and monitoring Satellite positioning (Vessels with capacity>55 kw) Daily Ship Reports (SSD) (Capacity>55 kw) 15-days reports (TAC species) (All) 5-days report (nottac species) (All) LOG-BOOKS with tear-off pages (EEZ, Coastal Fisheries) 16

17 Structure of reporting data Informati on Satellite Day Reports 15-Days 5-Days Log-Book Position Lat,Lon Lat,Lon - - Lat,Lon or Quadrat Effort - Yes - - Yes Species - Yes (5 sp) Yes Yes Yes Gear - Yes - - Yes Landing Yes Catch - Sum Sum Sum Unit Each fishing operation Yes 17

18

19 Gill nets study Bottom 12 мм 14 мм 16 мм 18 мм 20 мм 22 мм 24 мм 28 мм 30 мм 36 мм 40 мм 45 мм 50 мм 55 мм 60 мм Pelagic 8 мм 10 мм 12 мм 14 мм 16 мм 18 мм 20 мм 22 мм 24 мм

20 Размерная структура окуня 35% 30% % 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Mesh size, mm

21 White-fish 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Mesh size, mm

22 Индекс биомассы, кг/f CPUE, Perch Depth, m Mesh size, мм

23 Индекс биомассы, кг/сетесутки Biomass indexes Плотва Vendace Pike White-fish Bream Perch Ruff Mesh size, мм Лещ Налим Линь Щука Сиг Плотва Окунь Уклея Ряпушка Ерш

24 Индекс биомассы, кг/сетесутки Fish community structure 100% 90% Лещ 80% 70% 60% Плотва Сиг Щука 50% 40% Ряпушка 30% Окунь 20% 10% Ерш 0% Mesh size, мм Лещ Налим Линь Щука Сиг Плотва Окунь Уклея Ряпушка Ерш

25 Биомасса Видовая структура донного ихтиоценоза оз. Виштынецкого 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Year, mesh size Щука Угорь Сиг Плотва Налим Окунь Линь Лещ Ерш Ряпушка

26 Индекс биомассы Yw, кг Пространственная структура Сиг Окунь Плотва Облов Глубина, м; шаг ячеи, мм