2015 Mobility RepoRt

Transcription

1 2015 Annual Mobility Report

2

3

4 2013 n 2013, the North Florida ransportation Planning Organization (PO) completed a Congestion Management Process that identified mobility trends in the North Florida PO planning boundary. As the economy steadily improved, automobile travel grew by 3.45% and truck traffic grew by 3.1% reflecting the beginning of the economic recovery. ransit use grew 37.9% since 2008, reflecting the changing needs of elders and others who depend on transit and younger generations who choose transit more frequently. New growth within the region and economic recovery are predicted to increase travel in the region for the next five years. o meet this growing demand for travel, improvements and enhancements to mobility are needed throughout the region. By 2018, major infrastructure projects to relieve bottlenecks and add additional transportation capacity will be completed and open for traffic, creating positive benefits to all travels in this region.

5 Mobility rends 3.45% increase in automobile travel in 2013 compared to % increase in truck traffic in 2013 compared to % increased transit use he demand for travel is anticipated to return to pre-recession levels by the year 2018 hese major projects will have positive benefits to the travelers +of the region.

6

7 Contents List of Figures... ii List of ables... ii Background... 1 Data Collection and Analysis Methodology Mobility Performance Measures Analysis Optimize the Quantity of ravel Person-Miles raveled n Automobiles ruck-miles raveled Vehicle-Miles raveled Person rips ransit Ridership (Passengers) Optimize the Quality of ravel Average peed Daily Delay Average ravel Rate Reliability LO on Rural Facilities Accessibility Utilization of the ystem ystem Lane Miles Percent Miles everely Congested Vehicles per Lane per Hour Duration of Congestion Number of Passengers per Revenue Mile Corridor Analysis ummary i

8 List of Figures Figure 1. Congestion Management Process... 2 Figure 2. North Florida PO Planning Boundaries... 3 Figure 3. Congested Facilities... 4 Figure 4. Congested Facilities (nsets)... 5 Figure 5. Person-Miles raveled Daily (housands of Person-Miles) Figure 6. Person-Miles raveled during the Peak Hour (housands of Person-Miles) Figure 7. ruck-miles raveled (Daily) Figure 8. Vehicle-Miles raveled (Daily) Figure 9. Average ravel peeds during the Peak Hours (MPH) Figure 10. otal Daily Delay (Vehicle Hours) Figure 11. otal Daily Delay (Vehicle Hours) Adjusted Figure 12. ravel ime Reliability (Peak Hour) Figure 13. Percent of Rural Miles Meeting LO Criteria Figure 14. Percent Miles everely Congested During the Peak Hour Figure 15. Vehicles per Lane Mile in the Peak Hour Figure 16. Duration of Congestion (Hours) Figure 17. Blueoad Device Locations Planned within the North Florida PO Boundary Figure 18. Blueoad Device Locations Currently Active within the North Florida PO Boundary Figure Reliability Analysis (1 of 2) Figure Reliability Analysis (2 of 2) List of ables able 1. Congested Facilities... 6 able 2. ummary of Mobility Performance Measures able 3. Daily Person Miles raveled (thousands) able 4. ummary of Changes in Daily Person-Miles raveled (housands per Day) able 5. ummary of Percent Change in Person-Miles raveled Per Person per Day able 6. ruck-miles raveled able 7. ummary of Vehicle-Miles raveled able 8. ransit Ridership able 9. ummary of Average Vehicle peed (Daily) able 10. ummary of Vehicle Hours of Delay (Daily) able 11. ravel ime Reliability (Daily) able 12. Percent of Rural Miles Meeting LO Criteria able 13. ystem Lane Miles able 14. Vehicles per Lane per Hour (Peak Hour) able 15. Revenue Miles able 16. Passengers per Revenue Mile able 17. ummary of -95 Corridor Reliability able 19. ummary of Performance Measures able 20. Major mprovements with Committed Construction ii

9 Background his report s primary purpose is to describe the change in mobility that occurred since the prior year data was available. n 2013, the North Florida ransportation Planning Organization (PO) completed a Congestion Management Process (CMP) that included the development of performance measures and analysis of trends and conditions. he CMP identified congested corridors and recommended strategies and tactics to address these corridors. Maintenance of a CMP is a requirement for all Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) under Florida law and for MPOs in ransportation Management Areas (MAs) under Federal law. Consistent with the guidance from the Final Rule on the CMP for MAs (ection ), the intent of the CMP is to address congestion management through a process that provides for safe and effective integrated management and operation of the multimodal transportation system. MAP-21, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (P.L ), was signed into law by President Obama on uly 6, MAP-21 requires: within a metropolitan planning area serving a transportation management area, the transportation planning process under this section shall address congestion management through a process that provides for effective management and operation, based on a cooperatively developed and implemented metropolitan-wide strategy, of new and existing transportation facilities eligible for funding under this title and chapter 53 of title 49 through the use of travel demand reduction and operational management strategies. According to the Federal Highway Administration s CMP Guidebook, Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts of congestion on the movement of people and goods. he planning process is required to address the eight planning factors described in 23 CFR (a). Figure 1 summarizes the CMP. he North Florida PO s planning boundaries for which this CMP was developed is shown on Figure 2. he congested facilities identified in the CMP are shown on Figure 3 and Figure 4 and are summarized in able 1. 1

10 Figure 1. Congestion Management Process 2

11 ± 121A Miles 115 A NAAU A t. ohns A 10 A 1A 30 A 1A 1 15A Other Counties 5 107A B Nassau A 1A A 1A 200A Duval Clay 0016 County Boundaries 105A 0012 North Florida PO Boundary LEGEND A 1A A A 1A A A A A A C 109A 11 5 A B DUVAL D A A A A B A B 739B A 9 15A CLAY 230A 16A A B A B A 1A 2 20A A A1 A A 312 A1A A A A A OHN C D A 1A A 21B A A 219A 204 A1 A A 21 North Flori da PO CMP ystem Boundary 309B Figure 2 Page 3 A 1A 200A 309C 21 20A C 315

12 17 20 HLLARD 115 A FERNANDNA BEACH ± Miles CALLAHAN A NAAU 15A A1A 5 200A 200A A A B 105A A1A 105A A1A LEGEND North Florida PO Boundary Congested Facilities Cities County Boundaries Duval t. ohns Clay Nassau Other Counties ACKONVLLE A1A BALDWN DUVAL C B A D DOWNOWN NE A 228A A A A 90A A1A 101A A1A ACKONVLLE BEACH A ORANGE PARK A B 220A A 13B A1A PENNEY FARM 739 GREEN COVE PRNG AUGUNE BEACH 16A A A A. AUGUNE KEYONE HEGH 21 CLAY A 13A AUGUNE NE A A1A A1A C 309D 209 HANG PALAKA 209. OHN 207A A 309C Congested Facilities within North Florida PO Figure 3 Page 4 A1A

13 DUVAL B A 1A 109A ACKONVLLE A A Congested Facilities within North Florida PO - nset 1 Downtown Region. AUGUNE B A1A 1332 A1A 5A A1A 1339 ± LEGEND North Florida PO Boundary Congested Facilities Cities County Boundaries Duval t. ohns Clay Miles Nassau Other Counties AUGUNE BEACH OHN 5A A1A A1A 9 Congested Facilities within North Florida PO - nset 2 t. Augustine Region Figure 4 Page 5

14 able 1. Congested Facilities - Decreasing Order of Congestion D County Name of Facility From Location o Location Name Area 8 Clay Clay County R 21 Blanding Boulevard College Drive uzanne Avenue 151 t. ohns t ohns County R A1A CR 210 (Corona Road) olana Road 9 Clay Clay County R 21 Blanding Boulevard uzanne Avenue R 224 Kingsley Ave 10 Clay Clay County R 21 Blanding Boulevard R 224 Kingsley Avenue Duval Co. Line 152 t. ohns t ohns County R A1A olana Road Duval Co. Line 25 Duval acksonville R 212 Atlantic Boulevard t ohns Bluff Road Girvin Road 150 t. ohns t ohns County R A1A CR 210 Palm Valley Road CR 210 Corona Road 75 Duval acksonville R 115 outhside Boulevard R Butler Boulevard Beach Boulevard 155 Clay Orange Park U 17 R 224 Kingsley Avenue Wells Rd 85 Duval acksonville R 109 University Boulevard -95 U 90 Beach Boulevard 111 Duval acksonville -95 R 202. urner Butler Boulevard Bowden Road 144 t. ohns t ohns County R 13 Racetrack Road Duval Co. Line 140 Nassau Nassau County R AA U 17/R 5 CR 107/Brackrock Road 49 Duval acksonville R Butler Boulevard U 1 Philips Highway Duval acksonville Beach R A1A hird t. U 90 Beach Boulevard 19th treet 24 Duval acksonville R 10 Atlantic Boulevard R 116 Monument Road R 9A 113 Duval acksonville -95 R 109 University Boulevard Emerson Expressway 182 Duval acksonville R 13 an ose Boulevard Loretto Road Duval acksonville U 90 Beach Boulevard R 228 Hart Bridge Expressway outhside Boulevard 136 Duval acksonville Beach R A1A hird treet 19th t 34th treet 174 Duval acksonville R 10 Atlantic Boulevard -295 t. ohns Bluff Road 66 Duval acksonville U 1/ Philips Highway R 152 Baymeadows Road R 202. urner Butler Boulevard 39 Duval acksonville R 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay Co. Line t. ohns t Augustine U 1 R 207 King treet 114 Duval acksonville -95 R 228 Emerson Expressway Atlantic Boulevard Ramps 5 Clay Middleburg R21 Blanding Boulevard CR 218 N. City Limit - Palmetto treet 148 t. ohns t ohns County U 1 R 312 R Duval acksonville R 10 R 10 Atlantic Boulevard R 5 Exit Downtown 156 Clay Orange Park U 17 Wells Road Duval County Line 166 Duval acksonville Rail Connector/Pritchard Road -295 Old Kings Road 195 Duval Neptune Beach R 10 Atlantic Boulevard Ramp to A1A West A1A unction 6

15 D County Name of Facility From Location o Location Name Area 137 Duval acksonville Beach R A1A hird treet t ohns Co. Line 34th Avenue 189 Duval acksonville R 9A t ohns Bluff Rd U 90 Beach Boulevard 30 Duval acksonville R 152 Baymeadows Road U 1 Philips Highway t. ohns t Augustine an Marco Orange treet May treet 157 t. ohns t Augustine R A1A Bridge of Lions R A1A Bridge of Lions R A1A 179 Duval acksonville Ocean treet Ocean treet U 17 Main treet 26 Duval acksonville R 10 Atlantic Boulevard Girvin Road an Pablo Road 58 Duval acksonville R 115 Mathews Bridge R 109 University Boulevard Haines t Expressway Expressway 36 Duval acksonville U 90 Beach Boulevard R 9A Kernan Boulevard 154 Clay Orange Park U 17 Elbow Road R 224 Kingsley Avenue 40 Duval acksonville R 21 Blanding Boulevard -295 R rd treet 35 Duval acksonville U 90 Beach Boulevard R 115 outhside Boulevard Duval acksonville R 152 Baymeadows Road -95 Old Baymeadows Road 133 Duval acksonville -295 R 152 Baymeadows Road U 1 Philips Highway 95 Duval acksonville -10 R 129 McDuff Avenue U 17 Roosevelt Boulevard 97 Duval acksonville -10 tockton Ramps Duval acksonville -10 R 228/U 17 tockton Road Ramps 99 Duval acksonville -295 Old t Augustine Road R 13 an ose Boulevard 158 t. ohns t Augustine King t. U 1 Cordova treet 104 Duval acksonville Commonwealth Avenue 18 Duval acksonville R 115 Arlington Expressway Arlington Road North R 109 Cesery Boulevard 171 Clay Orange Park R 224 Kingsley Avenue Doctors Lake Drive U Duval acksonville R 115 Arlington Expressway R 115 outhside Boulevard Arlington Road 64 Duval acksonville U 1 Philips Highway -295 R 115 outhside Boulevard 71 Duval acksonville R 13 an ose Boulevard t ohns County Loretto Road 17 Duval acksonville R 155 Arlington Expressway R 109 Cesery Boulevard R 109 University Boulevard 60 Duval acksonville Mayport Road Church Road A1A 177 Duval acksonville R 126 Emerson treet -95 R 228 Emerson Expressway 147 t. ohns t ohns County U 1 Lewis Point Road R Duval acksonville -95 Bowden Road R 109 University Boulevard 116 Duval acksonville -95 R 5 Downtown Exit -10 Fuller Warren Bridge 110 Duval acksonville -95 R 152 Baymeadows Road R 202. urner Butler Boulevard 7

16 D County Name of Facility From Location o Location Name Area 73 Duval acksonville R 115 outhside Boulevard Belle Rive Boulevard R 152 Baymeadows Road 76 Duval acksonville R 115 outhside Boulevard U 90 Beach Boulevard R 10 Atlantic Boulevard 50 Duval acksonville R Butler Boulevard -95 Belfort Road 38 Duval acksonville U 90 Beach Boulevard Hodges Boulevard an Pablo Parkway 142 Duval Neptune Beach R A1A hird treet R 10 Atlantic Boulevard eagate Avenue 134 Duval acksonville Beach R A1A hird treet eagate Ave U 90 Beach Boulevard 102 Duval acksonville -295 R 208 Wilson Boulevard R 228 Normandy Boulevard 23 Duval acksonville R 10 Atlantic Boulevard R 115 outhside Boulevard Monument Road 83 Duval acksonville R 109 University Boulevard t Augustine Road Powers Avenue 120 Duval acksonville -95 R 15/U 17 R 122 Golfair Avenue 84 Duval acksonville R 109 University Boulevard Powers Ave U 1 Philips Avenue 19 Duval acksonville R 115 Arlington Expressway R 155 outhside Boulevard Regency Mall Entrance 22 Duval acksonville R 10 Atlantic Boulevard R 109 University Boulevard R 115 outhside Boulevard 61 Duval acksonville R 228 Normandy Boulevard Herlong Road Duval acksonville -295 R 10 Atlantic Boulevard t ohns Bluff Road 129 Duval acksonville -295 Merrill Rd Monument Road 130 Duval acksonville -295 Monument Rd R 10 Atlantic Boulevard 72 Duval acksonville R 115 outhside Boulevard U 1 Philips Highway Belle Rive Boulevard 62 Duval acksonville R 228 Normandy Boulevard -295 Lane Avenue 70 Duval acksonville U 17 Roosevelt Boulevard Park treet Edgewood Avenue 163 t. ohns t Augustine U 1 Ponce de Leon Boulevard King treet Castillo Drive 175 Duval acksonville R 152 Baymeadows Road Craven Road U 1Philips Highway 181 Duval acksonville U 17 Roosevelt Boulevard Edgewood Avenue McDuff Avenue 121 Duval acksonville -95 R 122 Golfair Avenue R 115 Lem urner Road 32 Duval acksonville R 152 Baymeadows Road R 115 outhside Boulevard R 9A 118 Duval acksonville -95 R 139/U 23 R 114 8th treet 14 Duval acksonville 8th t. Francis treet Perry treet 98 Duval acksonville Old t Augustine Road 132 Duval acksonville -295 R 202. urner Butler Boulevard Gate Parkway 94 Duval acksonville -10 Luna Ramps R 129 McDuff Avenue 101 Duval acksonville -295 R rd treet R 208 Wilson Boulevard 93 Duval acksonville -10 Cassat Avenue Luna Ramps 8

17 D County Name Name of Area Facility From Location o Location 92 Duval acksonville -10 Lane Avenue Cassat Avenue 11 Clay Clay County Branan Field Road Kindlewood Drive Duval Co. Line 117 Duval acksonville U 23 Kings Road 172 Duval acksonville R rd treet Ricker Road Duval Atlantic Beach R 10 Atlantic Boulevard West A1A unction R A1A hird treet 87 Duval acksonville R 109 University Boulevard R 10A Arlington Expressway Arlington Road 44 Duval acksonville R 104 Dunn Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Duval acksonville -95 R 114 8th treet R 15 20th treet 109 Duval acksonville -95 Exit to R 115 outhside Boulevard R 152 Baymeadows Road 81 Duval acksonville U 90 Union treet -95 U 17 Main treet 79 Duval acksonville U 90 tate treet U 1 Main treet U 23 Union treet 80 Duval acksonville U 90 tate treet Liberty treet U Duval acksonville -295 Commonwealth Avenue Pritchard Road 9

18 Data Collection and Analysis Methodology Existing data was used to identify and analyze trends and compare progress in achieving the mobility goals for the region. able 2 on the following page summarizes the performance measures for mobility identified in the CMP. Data was collected using the Florida Department of ransportation (FDO) Mobility Performance Measures database for data in the year his data was then analyzed and compared to data from prior years to assess the progress in achieving the benchmarks discussed. For each of the performance measures, a six-year summary from 2008 to 2013 was analyzed. his period also quantifies the trend that has occurred since the first year observable data of the recession was available. (he amount of travel within the region peaked in 2007.) A 2003 to 2013 trend is also provided in the form of charts to provide a visual representation of the trends over the period that mobility performance measure data is available. he visual representation of the trend is useful in understanding the overall trend prior to the recession. he data used as a foundation for the performance measure program is based on data collected using the statewide elemetered raffic Monitoring ystem (M). n 2005 and 2007 there were sampling errors related to the speed data collected within North Florida and this resulted in an over reporting of speed data. here is natural variation in the data collected and this variation is most prominent on the facility level. he system wide trends from year to year are reasonable. herefore, maps and facility level summaries of the data are not shown in this report. A minimum of three years of data since the CMP base year (2011) are needed to report a moving average on a facility level to provide appropriate summaries. n the CMP, the -95 corridor was used to establish a benchmark for reliability within the region. However, the reliability of the Blueoad data collected was not sufficient to establish a year over year trend of the reliability within the network. he accessibility performance measures, as noted in the CMP, will not change significantly from year to year. hese measures and benchmarks were included for assessment in the long-range transportation planning process. he data from the FDO Mobility Performance Measures database for 2013 did not provide data for the rural and urban minor arterial functional classifications to be included. A comparison between previous years could not directly be made for these two facility types. As a result of the missing data, total year statistics for 2013 are under-reported and the historical trends were modified to reflect this change in the data. For the historical trends, the class of categories no longer reported in the data were removed. Based on discussions with FDO, they no longer anticipate providing data for these functional classifications. 10

19 able 2. ummary of Mobility Performance Measures Objective Mobility Performance Measures Benchmark Optimize the quantity of travel Optimize the quality of travel mprove the accessibility to mode choices Optimize the utilization of the system Daily person-miles traveled (1) Daily truck-miles traveled (1) Daily vehicle-miles traveled (1) Person trips (1) ransit ridership (passengers) ncrease Average speed Maintain or improve the average travel speed Daily delay Maintain or reduce the average vehicle delay Average travel trip time Maintain or increase the average trip time Reliability Maintain or improve the reliability Level of ervice (LO) on rural facilities Maintain at LO standard (D or better) Proximity to major transportation hubs (2) Percent of lane-miles with bicycle and pedestrian accommodations (2) ransit coverage ncrease the percent of households served within 1/4 mile Percent of the system severely congested Maintain or reduce the percent of system (LO E or worse) heavily congested Percent of travel severely congested (LO Maintain or reduce the percent of travel E or worse) heavily congested Vehicles per lane-mile Optimize the vehicles per lane mile for a desired LO Duration of congestion Maintain or decrease the duration of congestion Number of passengers per revenue-mile Maintain or increase the number of passengers per revenue mile (1) Generally, increases in the quantity traveled (throughout) are preferred. However, consistent with livability and sustainability goals, one of the objectives is to reduce the amount of travel needed. herefore, no benchmarks are proposed, but monitoring is recommended. (2) his performance measure will not change significantly from year to year. 11

20 Mobility Performance Measures Analysis Optimize the Quantity of ravel Person-Miles raveled n Automobiles he person-miles traveled on a daily basis within the region increased slightly within the region from 2012 to he increase was not uniform across all facility and area types, but was within the standard sampling error overall. able 3 summarizes the change in person miles traveled since 2009 and Figure 5 (page 14) shows the trend since able 3. Daily Person Miles raveled (thousands) tem Person-Miles raveled 35,210 34,744 34,646 34,002 35,180 n addition to the primary performance measure of daily performance identified in able 2 and shown by Figure 5, peak-hour, person-miles traveled is also summarized in Figure 6. ince person-miles traveled represents the most significant performance measure in understanding trends in mobility since 2003, a special analysis was provided for this measure and is summarized able 4. From 2003 to 2007 (the peak before the economic downturn), person-miles traveled for automobiles increased by 2.56 percent per year (compound annual growth rate, CAGR). he recession resulted in a decrease in vehicle use that has had lingering effects through Based on analysis of prior economic recoveries and with the addition of data for the minor arterial function class, the post-recession growth rates are expected to return to pre-recession growth rates. able 4 on the next page provides a summary of the changes since

21 able 4. ummary of Changes in Daily Person-Miles raveled (housands per Day) Percent Change Functional Class Area nterstate Rural % % % % % % Principal Arterial Rural % % % % % % Minor Arterial Rural % 64.46% Major Collector Rural % % 42.86% 35.29% 42.86% 42.86% ubtotal % % % 90.45% 92.28% 94.98% nterstate Urban % % % % % % Freeways and Expressways Urban % 73.16% 76.49% 57.98% 58.13% % Principal Arterial Urban % 92.51% 94.92% 93.86% 95.43% % Minor Arterial Urban % 96.98% Collector Urban % 60.00% % 80.95% % % ubtotal % 99.77% 84.85% 76.97% 79.51% 85.04% OAL % % % 94.79% 98.51% % Compound Annual Growth Rate from % 0.41% 0.75% -1.06% -0.37% 0.34% 13

22 Person Miles raveled (Daily) 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 housands 8,000 6,000 4,000 2, nterstate (Rural) 4,543 5,077 4,936 5,348 5,516 5,425 5,566 5,466 5,621 5,369 5,557 Principal Arterial (Rural) 2,577 2,565 2,597 2,624 2,599 2,528 2,484 2,436 2,400 2,718 2,758 Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) 12,071 12,289 12,732 13,468 13,630 12,697 12,540 14,875 14,723 14,182 14,747 Freeways & Expressways (Urban) 4,840 5,051 5,361 6,178 6,385 6,269 6,240 3,589 3,613 3,541 3,702 Principal Arterial (Urban) 8,824 9,499 9,377 9,124 8,924 8,777 8,350 8,347 8,249 8,163 8,376 Collector (Urban) Figure 5. Person-Miles raveled Daily (housands of Person-Miles) 14

23 Person Miles raveled (Peak Hour) 1,400 1,200 1,000 housands nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) 1,017 1,036 1,073 1,135 1,149 1,070 1,057 1,254 1,241 1,195 1,240 Freeways & Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Collector (Urban) Figure 6. Person-Miles raveled during the Peak Hour (housands of Person-Miles) 15

24 Different from the total person-miles traveled changes, there has been a decrease in the average travel per person per day in automobiles across the region. hese changes could be a product of changing land use patterns and household locations that result in less need for longer trips or less driving for non-essential longer trips. he number of trips passing through the region driven by tourism or other industries could also result in decreased average travel per person. able 5 summarizes the average amount of travel per day per person. able 5. ummary of Percent Change in Person-Miles raveled Per Person per Day tem Person-Miles raveled (housands) 35,712 35,210 34,744 34,636 34,002 35,180 Population 1,294,319 1,305,837 1,318,481 1,322,280 1,331,616 1,345,120 Average Person-Miles raveled per Day (Miles) ruck-miles raveled imilar to automobile person-miles, truck-miles traveled have declined as a result of the recession. However, in 2012 a small increase in the truck-miles traveled was observed. For 2013, this trend continues across all facility types having complete data. his change is a leading economic indicator of the economic recovery. able 6 summarizes the trends in truck-miles traveled since 2008 and Figure 7 shows the trend since able 6. ruck-miles raveled tem ruck Miles raveled 2,031 1,931 1,678 1,670 1,689 1,742 Percent Change from % 82.60% 82.19% 83.18% 85.75% CAGR from % -9.12% -6.33% -4.50% -3.03% CAGR from Previous Year 1.14% 3.14% 16

25 ruck Miles raveled (Daily) 1,200 1, housands nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) 791 1,044 1,115 1,035 1, Freeways and Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Collector (Urban) Figure 7. ruck-miles raveled (Daily) 17

26 Vehicle-Miles raveled Vehicle-miles traveled trends have followed the same trends as the person-miles traveled and are summarized in the table below. able 7. ummary of Vehicle-Miles raveled tem Vehicle-miles raveled (Daily) in thousands 21,970 21,634 21,343 21,260 20,855 21,574 Person rips A viable way to estimate the number of person trips that are occurring each year does not exist at this time. Person trips is a good measure of effectiveness for land use and transportation decisions, therefore, it will remain in the CMP summary measures and will be reported on if data becomes available in the future. ransit Ridership (Passengers) ransit use in North Florida continues to be less than 1 percent of all person-miles traveled. However, transit use continued to rise with a 5.4 percent annual increase from 2012 to ince 2008, transit use in the area has increased by 37.9 percent. 1 able 8 summarizes the transit ridership for the acksonville ransportation Authority and the unshine Bus Company. Factors that have contributed to an increase in transit usage are believed to be the economic effects of the recession and the changing preferences for transit in the elderly drivers over 65 who are the largest growth sector of our population and 18 to 24 year olds who are less willing and in some cases less able to afford to drive. able 8. ransit Ridership ransit ystem acksonville ransportation Authority 54,524,160 54,873,285 62,393,143 69,837,248 70,826,923 74,615,327 t. ohns County Council on Aging (he unshine Bus Company) 1,116,219 1,011,012 1,362,376 1,675,407 1,958,710 2,099,386 otal 55,640,379 55,884,297 63,755,519 71,512,655 72,785,633 76,714,713 Percent Change From Previous Year 1.78% 5.40% Percent Change From % 37.9%

27 ravel ime Reliability (Peak Hour) % nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) Freeways & Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Figure 8. ravel ime Reliability (Peak Hour) 19

28 Optimize the Quality of ravel Average peed Average speeds across the network are generally the same, or decreasing. his could be a result of the added lane-miles on the roadway system. Figure 9 summarizes the trends in average vehicle speed since able 9 summarizes the trend since able 9. ummary of Average Vehicle peed (Peak Hour) tem Average peed (MPH) Daily Delay Dissimilar to person-miles and other performance measures there is a general decline in daily delay when analyzing recent trends. When using the Mobility Performance Measure Database, there are two years where the model results are outlying data sets when compared to other trends. hese outliers occurred for urban interstates in the years 2005 and hese data are shown in Figure 10. Figure 11 shows the trends with the outlier data removed. able 10 summarizes the vehicle hours of delay. able 10. ummary of Vehicle Hours of Delay (Daily) tem otal Delay (Vehicle- Hours) 39,470 30,563 22,713 27,917 25,017 17,763 Average ravel Rate Average travel rate, which is the inverse of speed, is not reported. his performance measure is redundant with the average vehicle speed and is not recommended for future updates. Reliability he reliability of the network did not change significantly from 2012 to ince 2003, urban minor arterials have improved their reliability while the reliability on urban freeway and expressways has declined. able 11 summarizes the travel time reliability on a daily basis weighted by the vehicle-miles traveled. Figure 12 shows the trend since able 11. ravel ime Reliability (Daily) tem ravel ime Reliability

29 Average ravel peed (Peak Hour) MPH nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) Freeways & Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Figure 9. Average ravel peeds during the Peak Hours (MPH) 21

30 otal Delay in Vehicle Hours (Daily) 70,000 60,000 50,000 Delay 40,000 30,000 20,000 10, nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) 18,474 7,097 64,060 20,914 61,917 11,957 14,970 2,146 3,512 8,160 3,882 Freeways and Expressways (Urban) 15,565 20,673 20,874 17,705 16,009 9,830 2,643 5,629 7,180 2,786 2,574 Principal Arterial (Urban) 16,654 26,366 28,571 19,157 18,331 17,263 12,624 14,380 16,608 13,538 10,782 Collector (Urban) nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) Freeways and Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Collector (Urban) Figure 10. otal Daily Delay (Vehicle Hours) 22

31 otal Delay in Vehicle Hours (Daily) - Adjusted 30,000 25,000 20,000 Delay 15,000 10,000 5, nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) 7,097 14,006 20,914 16,436 11,957 14,970 2,146 3,512 8,160 3,882 Freeways and Expressways (Urban) 20,673 20,874 17,705 16,009 9,830 2,643 5,629 7,180 2,786 2,574 Principal Arterial (Urban) 26,366 28,571 19,157 18,331 17,263 12,624 14,380 16,608 13,538 10,782 Collector (Urban) nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) Freeways and Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Collector (Urban) Figure 11. otal Daily Delay (Vehicle Hours) Adjusted 23

32 ravel ime Reliability (Peak Hour) % nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) Freeways & Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Figure 12. ravel ime Reliability (Peak Hour) 24

33 LO on Rural Facilities On rural facilities, the percent of miles meeting the LO criteria during the peak period has improved. All of the interstates, minor arterials and major collectors currently operate at a LO D or better according to the FDO s Mobility Performance Measures database. Figure 13 summarizes the percent- miles traveled meeting LO criteria on rural facilities. able 12 summarizes the trend for the last six years. able 12. Percent of Rural Miles Meeting LO Criteria tems Percent of Rural Miles Meeting LO Criteria Accessibility he accessibility performance measures are not anticipated to change significantly from year to year; therefore a benchmark in this report is not appropriate. Based on analysis conducted as part of the Congestion Management Plan, about 46% of all residential households present within the North Florida region have a transit stop within the quarter-mile radius and 87% of all residential households within North Florida are located within a five-mile radius of a park and ride lot. Utilization of the ystem ystem Lane Miles o understand changes that have occurred with system utilization, it is useful to first understand the changes in the network that have occurred over time. Excluding minor arterials, since 2008, 131 lane miles of capacity have been added to the network in North Florida. able 13. ystem Lane Miles tem ystem Lane Miles 2,386 2,393 2,406 2,414 2,485 2,517 Percent Miles everely Congested he urban interstate system was the most congested system on a per mile basis for much of the analysis period from 2003 to Between 2011 and 2012 there was a drop in the miles of congestion such that the urban freeway and expressway roadways are more congested. his change was likely a result of traffic diverting with the opening of R 9B and the improvements at the -95/-10 interchange being completed. Between 2012 and 2013, the urban interstate system was the most congested system, possibly from new construction on -95. he data available shows that the percentage of the miles severely congested is increasing for all facility types and area types. his could be a result of the addition in vehicle-miles traveled. Figure 14 shows the trend since

34 Percent Miles Meeting LO Criteria (Peak Period) - Rural Facilities % nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) Figure 13. Percent of Rural Miles Meeting LO Criteria 26

35 Percent Miles everely Congested (Peak Hour) % nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) nterstate (Urban) Freeways & Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Figure 14. Percent Miles everely Congested During the Peak Hour 27

36 Vehicles per Lane per Hour he number of vehicles that operate on each facility per lane mile demonstrates the utilization of each functional classification within the highway network. Urban interstate facilities serve significantly more vehicles per lane-mile than the other functional classifications. he trends observed with this performance measure are consistent with the other system utilization and person-mile traveled trends. able 14 summarizes the vehicles per lane per hour from 2008 to Figure 15 shows the trend since able 14. Vehicles per Lane per Hour (Peak Hour) tem Vehicles per Lane per Hour Duration of Congestion he duration of congestion, or the average number of hours LO E or LO F exists on the network was analyzed and consistent with other measures, there has been an increase in the duration of congestion. n the average duration of congestion on urban interstate facilities was 2 hours. ince 2009 the average is 1 hour or less. his data is rounded by the FDO Mobility Performance Measures database. Figure 16 shows the trend since Number of Passengers per Revenue Mile he number of passengers per revenue mile within the region increased significantly year over year for the last six years. his trend shows that the increase in ridership previously discussed is a result of more people using services than growth based on significant changes in the services provided. From 2012 to 2013, as shown in able 15, the number of revenue miles A operates has actually been reduced while ridership has increased. able 16 summarizes the passengers per revenue mile. able 15. Revenue Miles ransit ystem acksonville ransportation Authority 9,780,214 9,098,872 9,384,591 9,162,689 9,018,194 8,945,282 t. ohns County Council on Aging (he unshine Bus Company) 388, , , , , ,165 otal 10,168,491 9,448,859 9,841,972 9,641,336 9,484,319 9,410,477 able 16. Passengers per Revenue Mile ransit ystem acksonville ransportation Authority t. ohns County Council on Aging (he unshine Bus Company) Average

37 Vehicles Per Lane (Peak Hour) 1,800 1,600 1,400 Vehicles per Laneper Hour 1,200 1, nterstate Rural Princiapal Arterial Major Collector nterstate Urban 1,437 1,422 1,492 1,557 1,585 1,390 1,480 1,363 1,379 1,330 1,358 Freeways ,085 1,062 1, Princiapal Arterial Collector Figure 15. Vehicles per Lane Mile in the Peak Hour 29

38 Hours everely Congested (Daily) Hours nterstate (Rural) Principal Arterial (Rural) Major Collector (Rural) nterstate (Urban) Freeways & Expressways (Urban) Principal Arterial (Urban) Collector (Urban) Figure 16. Duration of Congestion (Hours) 30

39 -95 Corridor Analysis he FDO, in partnership with North Florida PO, deployed Bluetooth devices along major roadways within the North Florida region to obtain real-time data. Figure 17 shows the location of the Blueoad device deployments planned within the North Florida PO governing boundary. Approximately 90 percent of devices were deployed successfully. Figure 18 shows the Blueoad devices currently active within the North Florida PO boundary. ravel time and speed data was collected utilizing the Bluetooth devices along roadways within the North Florida region and historical data is stored on the Blueoad website. he travel time and speed data collection through the Bluetooth device deployment is an ongoing process and the system is being updated continuously to collect consistent data. As part of the CMP, the -95 corridor was chosen to conduct a reliability analysis utilizing the travel time and speed data collected by the Bluetooth devices. he purpose of this analysis is to compare the year-to-year changes on this roadway. Data was downloaded from the Blueoad website during a 5-week period - aturday, August 30 th, 2014 and Friday, October 4 th, A minimum of one month s data is essential on corridors to perform statistically significant reliability analysis. he -95 corridor within the limits of the study area is composed of ten segments each along the northbound and southbound direction. he pair D and the description of these segments are listed below: -95 Northbound Direction: Pair D 4267 outh of Race rack Road to -295 Pair D to North of Baymeadows Road Pair D North of Baymeadows Road to University Boulevard Pair D 2307 University Boulevard to Emerson treet Pair D 2309 Emerson treet to Atlantic Boulevard Pair D 2311 Atlantic Boulevard to Acosta Bridge Pair D 4248 Acosta Bridge to Kings Road Pair D 4274 Kings Road to Heckscher Drive Pair D 4276 Heckscher Drive to Pecan Park Road Pair D 7441 Pecan Park Road to R outhbound Direction: Pair D 7442 R 200 to Pecan Park Road Pair D 4277 Pecan Park Road to Heckscher Drive Pair D 9651 Heckscher Drive to Kings Road Pair D 4249 Kings Road to Acosta Bridge Pair D 2312 Acosta Bridge to Atlantic Boulevard Pair D 2310 Atlantic Boulevard to Emerson treet Pair D 2308 Emerson treet to University Boulevard Pair D University Boulevard to North of Baymeadows Road Pair D 4271 North of Baymeadows Road to -295 Pair D to outh of Race rack Road 31

40 Figure 17. Blueoad Device Locations Planned within the North Florida PO Boundary 32

41 Figure 18. Blueoad Device Locations Currently Active within the North Florida PO Boundary 33

42 An additional corridor was studied, the Beach Boulevard corridor between Parental Home Road and Hodges Boulevard. Data was downloaded from the Blueoad website for a five week period analysis, from December 17 th, 2014 through February 5 th, his corridor was composed of three segments in the northbound and southbound direction. he pair D and the description of these segments are listed below: U 90 Eastbound Direction: Pair D Parental Home Road to t. ohns Bluff Road Pair D t. ohns Bluff Road to -295 Pair D to Hodges Boulevard U 90 Westbound Direction: Pair D Hodges Boulevard to -295 Pair D to t. ohns Bluff Road Pair D t. ohns Bluff Road to Parental Home Road he travel time and speed information obtained for these roadway segments was available over 15- minute intervals for 24 hours a day. A total of 3,360 (35 days times 96, 15-minute intervals) data records should have been available if the Bluetooth units collected the data continuously over the five-week time-period. Although the availability of data available improved from the prior analysis, consistent data records could not be obtained over the study period for several segments. he data records that were available for each segment during the 5-week period were analyzed. he segments with missing data are as listed below: -95 Northbound Direction: Pair D 2311 Atlantic Boulevard to Acosta Bridge 0 Records (100 Percent Data Missing) Pair D 4248 Acosta Bridge to Kings Road 0 Records (100 Percent Data Missing) Pair D 4274 Kings Road to Heckscher Drive 0 Records (100 Percent Data Missing) -95 outhbound Direction: Pair D 9651 Heckscher Drive to Kings Road 0 Records (100 Percent Data Missing) Pair D 4249 Kings Road to Acosta Bridge 0 Records (100 Percent Data Missing) Pair D 2312 Acosta Bridge to Atlantic Boulevard 0 Records (100 Percent Data Missing) Pair D to outh of Race rack Road 0 Records (100 Percent Data Missing) 34

43 he results of the analysis are summarized in ables 17 and 18, and shown in Figures 19, 20, and 21. Red highlights on the figures indicate where reliability is less than 95 percent. Green highlights on the table show where improvements were identified. Yellow is a small decline and red where a significant decline was identified. t is anticipated that enhancements will be performed on the Blueoad data collection technology in the coming months and more data should be available for future updates. he improvements will enhance the consistency and quality of the data. Additional coverage into the beaches, Clay and t. ohns counties will also be provided. n addition, the construction of the -95 overland bridge project had a significant impact on the availability of data. Future year analysis will provide a more detailed look at the impacts of construction of the reliability and operations during construction operations. 35

44 able 17. ummary of -95 Corridor Reliability From o Free Flow peed (MPH) Maximum Average peed (MPH) Unreliable peed (MPH) Reliability (%) Duration of Unreliability (hours) August outhbound R 200 Buccaneer rail Pecan Park Road % - Pecan Park Road R 105 Heckscher Drive % - R 105 Heckscher Drive U 1 Kings Road U 1 Kings Road Acosta Bridge Acosta Bridge Atlantic Boulevard Atlantic Boulevard Emerson treet % 1.75 Emerson treet University Boulevard % 1.00 University Boulevard North of R 152 Baymeadows Road % - North of R 152 Baymeadows Road % outh of Race rack Road Northbound outh of Race rack Road % R 152 Baymeadows Road % 0.75 R 152 Baymeadows Road University Boulevard % 0.25 University Boulevard Emerson treet % - Emerson treet Atlantic Boulevard % 1.25 Atlantic Boulevard Acosta Bridge Acosta Bridge U 1 Kings Road U 1 Kings Road R 105 Heckscher Drive R 105 Heckscher Drive Pecan Park Road % - Pecan Park Road R 200 Buccaneer rail % - 36

45 able 18. ummary of U-90 Corridor Reliability From o Free Flow peed (MPH) Maximum Average peed (MPH) Unreliable peed (MPH) Reliability (%) Duration of Unreliability (hours) December 2014 U-90 Eastbound Parental Home Road t. ohns Bluff Road % - t. ohns Bluff Road % Kernan Boulevard % - U-90 Westbound Kernan Boulevard % t. ohns Bluff Road % - t. ohns Bluff Road Parental Home Road % - 37

46 Kings Road to Heckscher Drive Acosta Bridge to Kings Road University Boulevard to Emerson treet Baymeadows Road to University Boulevard Emerson treet to Atlantic Boulevard -295 to Baymeadows Road peed (MPH) from Pecan Park Road to R 200 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30-95 from Heckscher Drive to Pecan Park Road 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30 No Data Available -95 from Kings Road to Hecksher Drive -95 from Acosta Bridge to Kings Road -95 from Atlantic to Acosta Bridge -95 from Emerson treet to Atlantic Boulevard 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30-95 from Universtiy Boulevard to Emerson treet 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30-95 from Baymeadows Road to University Boulevard 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30-95 from -295 to Baymeadows Road 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30-95 from Race rack Road to :00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30 ime of Day Average of peed (mph) Min of peed (mph) Max of peed (mph) -95 Northbound peed Variation Chart and Reliability Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 70 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 72.7 MPH Unreliable peed 65 MPH Reliability 98.87% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 65 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 68.4 MPH Unreliable peed 60 MPH Reliability 98.29% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 60 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 66.5 MPH Unreliable peed 50 MPH Reliability 94.04% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 1.25 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 65 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 67.2 MPH Unreliable peed 50 MPH Reliability 94.57% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.50 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 65 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 73.6 MPH Unreliable peed 50 MPH Reliability 95.75% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.25 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 60 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 67.9 MPH Unreliable peed 50 MPH Reliability 96.69% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.75 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 60 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 61.0 MPH Unreliable peed 50 MPH Reliability 91.65% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 1.00 hours Figure 19 Page 38

47 Atlantic Boulevard to Kings Road University Boulevard to Emerson treet Baymeadows to University Boulevard Emerson treet to Atlantic Boulevard -295 to Baymeadows Road from Pecan Park Road to R 200 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30-95 from Heckscher Drive to Pecan Park Road 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23: No Data Available -95 from Kings Road to Heckscher Drive -95 from Acosta Bridge to Kings Road -95 from Atlantic Boulevard to Acosta Bridge -95 from Emerson treet to Atlantic Boulevard 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23: from University Boulevard to Emerson treet 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30-95 from Baymeadows to University Boulevard 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30-95 from -295 to Baymeadows Road Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 70 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 72.3 MPH Unreliable peed 65 MPH Reliability 96.98% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 70 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 69.2 MPH Unreliable peed 60 MPH Reliability 99.28% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 60 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 58.8 MPH Unreliable peed 50 MPH Reliability 91.52% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 1.75 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 65 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 70.5 MPH Unreliable peed 50 MPH Reliability 93.29% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 1.00 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 65 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 69.7 MPH Unreliable peed 50 MPH Reliability 96.99% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours Race rack Road to -295 peed (MPH) :00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30 ime of Day Average of peed (mph) Min of peed (mph) Max of peed (mph) Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 65 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 70.8 MPH Unreliable peed 55 MPH Reliability 99.11% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours -95 outhbound peed Variation Chart and Reliability Figure 20 Page 39

48 Parental Home Road to t. ohns Bluff Road t. ohns Bluff Road to to Kernan Boulevard peed (MPH) U-90 peed Variation Chart and Reliability U 90 EABOUND Parental Home Road to t. ohns Bluff Road 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30 t. ohns Bluff Road to :00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23: to Kernan Boulevard 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30 U 90 WEBOUND 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30 t. ohns Bluff Road to :00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30 Parental Home Road to t. ohns Bluff Road 0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 20:30 21:00 21:30 22:00 22:30 23:00 23:30 ime of Day Max of peed (mph) Average of peed (mph) Min of peed (mph) Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 35 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 38.7 MPH Unreliable peed 30 MPH Reliability 79.08% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 4.50 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 35 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 39.4 MPH Unreliable peed 30 MPH Reliability 94.04% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 40 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 42.0 MPH Unreliable peed 30 MPH Reliability 98.16% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 40 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 43.1 MPH Unreliable peed 30 MPH Reliability 96.15% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 0.00 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 35 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 41.7 MPH Unreliable peed 30 MPH Reliability 74.89% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 4.50 hours Measure of Effectiveness Values Free Flow peed (FF) 35 MPH Max. of Ave. peed 41.2 MPH Unreliable peed 30 MPH Reliability 79.12% Duration of Unreliable peed (within 24 hours) 4.00 hours Figure 21 Page 40