Long-Term Transportation Plan

Transcription

1 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy

2

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN RESPONSIBILITY AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS MONITORING STRATEGY LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Primary Respnsibility and Methds fr Implementatin...7 Table 2: Evaluatin Criteria, Scring & Weighting...11 Table 3: Mnitring Plan City-Wide and Neighburhd...15 Table 4: Mnitring Plan Specific Mdes and Lcatins...16 APPENDIX A: List Of Initiatives Evaluated APPENDIX B: Evaluatin Criteria LIST OF APPENDICES Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy 1

4 (This page left blank) 2 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin Plan & Mnitring Strategy

5 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City f Nrth Vancuver adpted a Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan in April The Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan is intended t prvide the City with a clear visin fr the multi-mdal transprtatin system ver the next 20 years and beynd. The Transprtatin Plan presents a visin fr each f the primary mdes f travel namely, walking, cycling, transit, the rad netwrk, and gds and services mvement. In additin, the plan prvides guidance regarding a Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategy. Each f these cre cmpnents f the plan cntains several inter-related features designed t achieve the verall plicy bjectives fr the City. Many features are the respnsibility f the City, while thers are the respnsibility f ther agencies, such as the Ministry f Transprtatin & Infrastructure and TransLink. All features f the Plan are cnsidered imprtant t achieve a sustainable, multi-mdal transprtatin netwrk, hwever, significant csts are invlved with implementing many f these features. As such, it is imprtant t nte that implementatin f the Transprtatin Plan requires cmmitments f the City s resurces, ther partner agencies and the private sectr t achieve the Plan s gals. The Implementatin and Mnitring Strategy in this reprt details a prcess t evaluate varius transprtatin related initiatives relative t the OCP Plicy Paths as well as their cntributin t mbility in the cmmunity. This prcess will be used t evaluate prjects fr cnsideratin by Cuncil in the City s 10-year Capital Plan cmmencing in 2010 and cntinuing in subsequent years. The develpment f the implementatin strategy started with a snap sht in time t identify varius ptential initiatives t supprt key features f the Plan, based n technical wrk, findings frm previus studies, and feedback frm the cmmunity during the develpment f the Transprtatin Plan. These ranged frm the high-level initiatives that wuld serve the entire City, r particular neighburhd, t mre specific crridr r lcatin related initiatives. Order-f-magnitude cst estimates were develped fr these initiatives t gain a sense f ptential verall future transprtatin investment fr the City. Hwever, the actual csts fr implementatin culd vary significantly fr each initiative, and many prjects such as greenways and bicycle rutes are already in ther City plans. In additin, pssible cntributins frm varius agencies and the private sectr are nt pssible t estimate at this time. Thus, it was decided t fcus the implementatin strategy n the evaluatin prcess rather than the initiatives themselves, since the initiatives will evlve ver the life f the Plan as the cmmunity evlves. The initially identified initiatives were used t test the evaluatin prcess and t cnfirm that resulting pririties reflect the implementatin pririties identified thrugh the Transprtatin Plan develpment. This apprach will assist in the City s capital planning prcess and ensure that prjects prpsed fr Cuncil cnsideratin in the capital plans reflect the current transprtatin system needs and the brader City s pririties. Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy 3

6 The implementatin and mnitring strategy includes three cmpnents: 1. Respnsibility and Methds f Implementatin. The implementatin f the Transprtatin Plan requires cmmitment f the City s resurces, ther partner agencies and the private sectr t achieve the Plan s gals. This sectin f the strategy utlines the primary respnsibility fr each f the key features f the Plan (City f Nrth Vancuver r ther agency). In additin, it shuld be nted that there may be a rle fr the private sectr t cntribute t the implementatin f many f the features identified in the Transprtatin Plan thrugh land develpment prjects. Fr each feature identified as a City respnsibility, this sectin utlines the methds f implementatin (plicy develpment, capital prjects and prgramming, r nging maintenance). 2. Evaluatin Prcess. The implementatin strategy includes an evaluatin prcess fr identifying pririty imprvements based n several criteria: alignment with the OCP Plicy Paths, relative mbility and safety benefits, relative cst, and multi-mdal integratin. The purpse f the evaluatin prcess is t bjectively priritize the relative imprtance f the varius prjects in terms f their cntributin t the primary gals and the City s OCP and their cntributin t imprvements t the transprtatin netwrk. The evaluatin prcess described in this sectin will be used t develp a list f prjects t be prpsed fr Cuncil cnsideratin in the City s 10-year Capital Plan cmmencing in 2010 and cntinuing in subsequent years. At that time, financial implicatins t the capital and perating budgets will be utlined including pssible cntributins frm ther agencies. 3. Mnitring Prgram. In rder t ensure the Plan s success ver the lng-term in terms f bth prgress in implementing the initiatives, and in terms f the success in achieving the City s verall gals, a mnitring strategy has been develped. The elements f the mnitring strategy were selected t prvide a balance between quantitative and qualitative measures, shrt-term and lnger-term measures, and city-wide and lcatin-specific measures. This apprach als makes use, where pssible, f data frm external surces t make the mst effective use f the City s resurces. 4 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin Plan & Mnitring Strategy

7 2.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2.1 Respnsibility and Methds fr Implementatin This sectin utlines the primary respnsibility fr each f the key features f the Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan. Many features are the respnsibility f the City, while thers are the respnsibility f ther agencies, such as the Ministry f Transprtatin & Infrastructure and TransLink. In additin, it shuld be nted that there may be a rle fr the private sectr t cntribute t the implementatin f many f the features identified in the Transprtatin Plan thrugh land develpment prjects. Fr thse features identified as the respnsibility f the City, this sectin als utlines whether they will be implemented thrugh plicy develpment, capital planning and prgramming, r nging maintenance. Table 1 utlines the primary respnsibility and methds f implementatin fr each f the features identified in the Transprtatin Plan. The features f the plan identified as being the City s respnsibility and invlving resurces fr capital infrastructure r prgramming are described in further detail belw. Fr thse features, initiatives will be develped fr evaluatin and priritizatin in the City s future capital planning prcesses. Pedestrian Plan: Pedestrian treatments, which include sidewalks, landscaped bulevards, curb extensins, bus bulges, median islands, curb letdwns, marked crsswalks and enhanced crsswalk treatments, accessible pedestrian signals, cuntdwn timers, street furniture, and wayfinding signage. Greenways, which includes new multi-use pathways and cnnectins fr pedestrians, cyclists and ther users. Bicycle Plan: Bicycle netwrk, including bicycle lanes, marked-wide curb lanes, and shared bicycle rutes as well as crssing treatments. Bicycle supprt strategies, which includes shrt-term and lng-term bicycle parking. Transit Strategy: Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy 5

8 Imprved accessibility, which is based n TransLink's Universally Accessible Bus Stp Design Guidelines and includes thse activities that the Design Guidelines reprt indicates shuld be undertaken by municipalities, including: wheelchair pads, tactile guiding indicatrs, seating, and shelters and ther furniture. Transit pririty treatments, such as signal crdinatin, bus queue jumper lanes, and dedicated bus lanes. Rad Netwrk Plan: Majr Rad Netwrk Imprvement Strategies, which includes safety and peratinal imprvements alng crridrs and at specific lcatins. It shuld be nted that safety and peratinal imprvements are nt necessarily simply fr vehicular traffic, but can als include imprvements fr pedestrians, bicycles, and transit. Arterials, Cllectrs, and Lcal Rad Enhancements, which includes safety and peratinal imprvements alng crridrs and at specific lcatins. As nted abve, safety and peratinal imprvements are nt necessarily simply fr vehicular traffic, but can als include imprvements fr pedestrians, bicycles, and transit. Prtect Neighburhds, which refers t the develpment f traffic calming plans. Gds & Services Mvement Strategy: Minimized delays alng truck rutes, which includes safety and peratinal imprvements alng crridrs and at specific lcatins. Travel Demand Management Strategy: Educatin & awareness, such as develping TravelSmart prgrams fr City f Nrth Vancuver neighburhds as well as TDM prgrams fr elementary schls, secndary schls, majr businesses, and small emplyers. 6 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin Plan & Mnitring Strategy

9 Table 1: Primary Respnsibility and Methds fr Implementatin Features Primary Respnsibility City Implementatin City Other Agency Plicy Capital / Prgram Maintenance Pedestrian Plan 1. Pedestrian Areas & Generatrs X X 2. Pedestrian Treatments X X X 3. Greenways X X Bicycle Plan 1. Bicycle Netwrk X X 2. Design Guidelines X X 3. Bicycle Supprt Strategies X X X 4. Greenways X X Transit Strategy 1. Imprved Accessibility X X X X 2. Increased Frequency & Cverage X 3. Expanded Frequent Transit Netwrk X 4. Transit Pririty Treatments X X X 5. U-Pass Prgram X 6. Expanded SeaBus & Terminal X Rad Netwrk Plan 1. Updated Radway Classificatin System* X X 2. Emergency and Disaster Respnse Rutes X X 3. Majr Rad Netwrk Imprvement Strategies X X 4. Arterials, Cllectrs & Lcal Rad Enhancements X X 5. Parking Strategies X X 6. Prtect neighburhds X X Gds & Services Mvement Strategy 1. Minimized Delays Alng Truck Rutes X X 2. Signage Strategy X X 3. Effective Use f Freight Infrastructure X Travel Demand Management Strategy 1. Integrated Land Use & Transprtatin Planning X X 2. Parking Management Strategies X X 3. Leadership X X 4. Educatin & Awareness X X X X * = Already cmplete Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy 7

10 Fr each f the features f the plan identified as being the City s respnsibility and invlving resurces fr capital infrastructure r prgramming, the implementatin strategy identified ptential initiatives based n a current snap sht in time. These ptential initiatives were identified based n technical wrk, findings frm previus studies, and feedback frm the cmmunity during the develpment f the Transprtatin Plan. These ranged frm the high-level initiatives that wuld serve the entire City, r particular neighburhd, t mre specific crridr r lcatin related initiatives. These ptential initiatives were used t test the evaluatin prcess discussed in the fllwing sectin. Appendix A summarizes thse ptential initiatives identified in the plan as a City respnsibility and implemented thrugh capital planning r prgramming, and categrizes these initiatives based n whether they serve the entire City r whether they fcus n particular neighburhds, crridrs r specific lcatins such as intersectins. 2.2 Evaluatin This sectin prvides a summary f the evaluatin prcess that will be used t priritize varius initiatives t assist City staff in its future capital planning prcesses. The purpse f the evaluatin prcess dcumented in this sectin is t bjectively priritize the relative imprtance f the varius initiatives identified in the Transprtatin Plan in terms f their cntributin t the primary gals f the City s Official Cmmunity Plan (OCP) as well as their cntributin t imprvements t the transprtatin netwrk. It shuld be emphasized that all features f the Plan are cnsidered imprtant t achieve a sustainable, multi-mdal transprtatin netwrk. As such, this evaluatin prcess is used t priritize these imprtant features in rder t select prjects fr implementatin. It shuld be nted that adjustments t the pririty lists that will be develped using the evaluatin prcess may be required t reflect factrs nt cnsidered in the evaluatin, such as t take advantage f a funding pprtunity, land develpment prjects and crdinatin with ther City prjects (such as street and utility prjects, the Greenways prgram, the GHG Lcal Actin Plan, and the TDM Prgram). 8 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin Plan & Mnitring Strategy

11 The fllwing criteria will be used t evaluate transprtatin initiatives. These criteria have been develped based n feedback frm City staff. Alignment with Official Cmmunity Plan Plicy Paths. This criterin prvides a measure f the degree t which each initiative aligns with each f the ten OCP Plicy Paths. A binary scring system was established fr each Plicy Path, whereby a scre f 0 indicates that the initiative des nt align with the respective Plicy Path and a scre f 1 indicates that the initiative des align with the respective Plicy Path. The criteria that are used t assess each Plicy Path were based n the gals and bjectives utlined in the OCP and are described belw: A Sense f Place whether the initiative prvides pedestrian-friendly cnnectins between neighburhds and t the cre f the City. Land Use - whether the initiative supprts a variety f land uses, including residential, cmmercial, industrial, and institutinal. Transprtatin, Mbility & Access whether the initiative encurages the safe, cnvenient, and efficient use f a variety f transprtatin chices, with pririty given t walking, cycling, and transit. Cmmunity Well-Being whether the initiative supprts mbility, accessibility, and safety fr all members f the ppulatin, including yuth, the elderly, and peple with disabilities. Envirnment whether the initiative reduces energy needs and cntributes t reductin f lcal Greenhuse Gas emissins. Parks & Greenways whether the initiative cntributes t the develpment f the trail and/r greenways netwrk. Leisure & Culture whether the initiative supprts and prvides access t cmmunity facilities, such as recreatin centres, and cultural facilities. Cmmunity Infrastructure whether the initiative prvides infrastructure that imprves quality f life and prtects the envirnment at an affrdable cst. Ecnmy & Ecnmic Develpment whether the initiative supprts majr emplyment areas and businesses in the Twn Centre. Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy 9

12 Municipal Financial Planning whether the initiative ensures that sufficient funding is prvided ver the lng-term s that infrastructure can be sustained. Relative safety benefits. This criterin prvides a measure f the degree t which the treatment culd imprve rad safety cnditins fr all user grups (pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles). A subjective rating n a scale f 1 t 4 reflects expected safety benefits, as fllws: 1 = N safety benefit 2 = Minr safety benefit 3 = Mderate safety benefit 4 = High safety benefit Relative cst. This criterin prvides an assessment f the relative cst f each treatment. It shuld be nted that the intent f this criteria is t identify rder r magnitude cst estimates t understand the relative cst difference between each initiative. 1 = Cst f $500,000 r mre 2 = Cst between $250,000 and $500,000 3 = Cst between $100,000 and $250,000 4 = Cst f $100,000 r less Multi-mdal integratin. This criterin describes the pprtunities fr integratin with multiple mdes f transprtatin. A higher scre wuld be assigned t a prject that wuld benefit multiple mdes f transprtatin, which culd range, fr example, frm a bus bulge which presents benefits bth t transit users and t pedestrians, t crridr imprvements that fllw a cmplete streets principle and prvide imprvements fr all rad users (pedestrians, cyclists, transit, and vehicles). A subjective rating n a scale f 1 t 4 reflects a range frm initiatives that nly benefit ne mde f transprtatin t initiatives that benefit several mdes f transprtatin, as fllws: 1 = Initiative benefits nly ne mde f transprtatin. 2 = Opprtunities t integrate with ne ther mde f transprtatin. 10 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin Plan & Mnitring Strategy

13 3 = Opprtunities t integrate with tw ther mde f transprtatin. 4 = Opprtunities t integrate with three r mre ther mde f transprtatin. Weightings were applied t all criteria as summarized belw, t reflect the relative imprtance f each criterin. These weightings have been develped in cnsultatin with City staff t balance the effects f varius criteria in the verall evaluatin scre. Alignment with Official Cmmunity Plan Plicy Paths: 1 Relative Safety Benefits: 3 Relative Cst: 1 Multi-Mdal Integratin: 3 The evaluatin criteria, scring system, and weighting scheme are summarized in Table 2. A detailed breakdwn f each criteria used fr the evaluatin, including supprting gals, scring system, and weighting, is prvided in Appendix B. Table 2: Evaluatin Criteria, Scring & Weighting Criteria Scring Maximum Raw Scre Weight Maximum Weighted Scre Alignment with Official Cmmunity Plan A Sense f Place 0, Land Use 0, Transprtatin, Mbility & Access 0, Cmmunity Well-Being 0, Envirnment 0, Parks & Greenways 0, Leisure & Culture 0, Cmmunity Infrastructure 0, Ecnmy & Ecnmic Develpment 0, Municipal Financial Planning 0, Ttal Relative Safety Benefits Relative Cst Multi-Mdal Integratin Ttal 38 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy 11

14 The evaluatin criteria, scring, and weighting system yield pssible scres ranging frm a minimum f 3 t a maximum f 38. T test the evaluatin prcess, the ptential initiatives that were initially identified were evaluated (see Appendix A). In general, the results f the test f the evaluatin prcess indicate that the highest weighted scres supprt alternative mdes f transprtatin. In particular, several Travel Demand Management (TDM) prgrams received relatively high weighted scres, as did many bicycle imprvements and pedestrian imprvements. This is generally cnsistent with the implementatin pririties that were identified thrugh feedback frm the Jint Advisry Cmmittee during the Transprtatin Plan, where cmmittee members indicated that the pririties fr implementatin shuld generally be directed twards pedestrian and transit imprvements, the TDM strategy, and bicycle imprvements. The prcess described abve is prpsed t be used t evaluate prjects fr cnsideratin by Cuncil in the year Capital Plan and fr use in the capital planning prcesses in subsequent years. This apprach wuld ensure that prjects prpsed fr Cuncil cnsideratin in the capital plans reflect the current transprtatin system needs and brader City s pririties. It shuld be emphasized that the results f the evaluatin prcess are intended t aid the City in its future decisin-making and fr capital budget planning. In sme cases, an initiative with a lwer evaluatin scre may be implemented prir t a ne with a higher scre if an pprtunity presents itself (i.e. as redevelpment r grant pprtunities arise). Cnversely, a prject with a higher evaluatin scre may be implemented later than ne with a lwer scre if the csts are prhibitive and if cst-sharing pprtunities are nt available. In additin, the evaluatin scres will als be used t guide future transprtatin initiatives, such as the Sidewalk Assessment and Streetlighting Strategy. 2.3 Financial Implicatins Significant csts are invlved with implementing many f the features f the Transprtatin Plan. Hwever, it is planned that the City s cntributin t the implementatin wuld nt be mre than what is currently spent n transprtatin related initiatives in the City s current Capital prgram. Rather, the current funding level wuld be refcused t pririties as utlined in the Plan and priritized by the implementatin strategy. 12 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin Plan & Mnitring Strategy

15 Sme features f the plan are the respnsibility f ther agencies, such as transit service that wuld nt invlve the City s funding, hwever they are very imprtant t achieve a sustainable, multi-mdal transprtatin netwrk, and City staff will need t wrk with these the respnsible agencies fr design and implementatin f prjects thrugh separate prcesses. In respect t Plan features that are the City s respnsibility, presently there are numerus pprtunities fr cst-sharing with varius prvincial and federal agencies thrugh grant prgrams and the private sectr thrugh land develpment prjects. In additin, sme cst-saving culd be achieved by crdinating prjects, such as n-street bicycle facilities and sidewalks with existing prgrams such as pavement management and lcal area services prgrams. This may result in re-allcatin f funding available fr street and transprtatin imprvements. Varius initiatives culd als be accmplished thrugh crdinatin with the greenways prgrams. The evaluatin prcess as described in this reprt will be used t develp a list f prjects t be prpsed fr Cuncil cnsideratin in the year Capital Plan and at that time financial implicatins t the capital and perating budgets ver the next 10-years will be utlined, including pssible cntributins frm ther agencies. Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy 13

16 3.0 MONITORING STRATEGY A mnitring prgram is essential t ensure that the Transprtatin Plan is implemented as intended, and t determine whether the plan is achieving its gals. A mnitring prgram will als enable municipal staff t justify cntinued expenditures and allcatin f resurces t implement priritized initiatives f the Transprtatin Plan. Mnitring als prvides a means f identifying changing cnditins which wuld require changes t the Transprtatin Plan. The mnitring prgram needs t be: Meaningful. The mnitring prgram will need t utline a mnitring strategy that yields meaningful results and can pint t the success in achieving the City s brad gals and bjectives, such as the OCP Plicy Paths, Greenhuse Gas Reductin, prmtin f alternate mdes f transprtatin, etc. Measurable. The mnitring prgram needs t establish criteria that are readily measurable and fr which data r infrmatin can be readily btained. Manageable. The mnitring prgram needs t take int accunt the resurce limitatins f the City and will identify measures where infrmatin is accessible r data is simple t cllect. The mnitring prgram will fcus n tw cmpnents: first, the degree f prgress in implementing the plan, and secndly, the utcmes f the plan at varius scales (city-wide, neighburhds, crridrs, areas, and specific lcatins). Table 3 n the fllwing page utlines key utcmes f the mnitring strategy at the city-wide and neighburhd utcmes, alng with measures, existing baseline infrmatin, future targets, and data surces. Data fr city-wide and neighburhd utcmes is derived frm ther data surces, such as TransLik s Trip Diary Survey (cnducted every 4-5 years) and Statistics Canada Census Data (cnducted every 5 years). As such, these measures are manageable fr the City t track, as there is n direct data cllectin required. Since these utcmes prvide brad, aggregate-level data, the City can establish targets fr each f these measures t track prgress in achieving the gals f the plan ver time. 14 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin Plan & Mnitring Strategy

17 Table 3: Mnitring Plan City-Wide and Neighburhd Outcme Measure Existing 20-Year Target Data Surce City-Wide Envirnmental Outcmes Transprtatin-related GHG emissins (tnnes f C02e) T be determined based n best available data City-Wide Travel Patterns Neighburhd Travel Patterns Travel Behaviur Ttal number f daily trips Number f daily vehicle trips per capita % Internal Trips (within the City f Nrth Vancuver) Transit Mde Share Bicycle Mde Share Walking Mde Share Ttal number f daily trips Number f daily vehicle trips per capita Transit Mde Share Bicycle Mde Share Walking Mde Share Median Trip Distance Travel Demand Management * = 2004 Trip Diary Survey ** = based n 2004 ppulatin prvided by BC Stats 228,000 (2004)* 3.9 (2004)** 26% (2004)* 9% (2004)* 1.6% (2004)* 9.3* (2004)* T be determined fr each neighburhd T be determined based n survey results 33% reductin frm 2007 levels (12 year target) n/a % 15% 3% 12% T be determined fr each neighburhd T be determined based n survey results TransLink fuel cnsumptin data ICBC Vehicle Fleet data Air Care travel distance data TransLink Travel Diary Survey Statistics Canada Census TransLink Travel Diary Survey (Traffic Zne) Statistics Canada Census (Census Tract) Emplyer Surveys In additin, Table 4 utlines key utcmes fr specific mdes f transprtatin at varius lcatins thrughut the City. These utcmes will prvide measures fr City n a mre frequent basis (ie every 2 years) and at specific lcatins. These utcmes will be measured thrugh ccupancy and classificatin cunts fr vehicles as well as pedestrian and bicycle cunts. Hwever, due t the variability f the data at this scale (ie cunts at specific times and lcatins culd vary significantly based n factrs beynd the City s cntrl, such as weather cnditins r traffic cnditins utside the City), existing baseline infrmatin has nt been prvided and targets have nt been established fr these utcmes. Targets will be established after tw-three cnsecutive survey results. Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy 15

18 As such, the mnitring strategy has been develped t cmbine external data surces which are available every 4-5 years (such as TransLink s Reginal Travel Diary Survey and Statistics Canada Census data) and which are useful t mnitr brad trends ver time, with City data cllectin that shuld be cnducted every 1-2 years t prvide mre regular and mre detailed results. The City shuld prepare a mnitring reprt every 1-2 years t summarize the data cllectin and results, and t track prgress regarding these results ver time. It is estimated that it will cst the City apprximately $30,000 t mnitr the results n a bi-annual basis. Table 4: Mnitring Plan Specific Mdes and Lcatins Measure Data Surce Pssible Lcatins Duratin Number f vehicle trips entering/exiting City SOV Carpl/Vanpl Gds mvement Autmatic traffic vlume cunts Manual vehicle ccupancy and classificatin cunts Marine Drive west f Mackay 1 st Street east f Mackay* Westview Drive suth f Highway 1 Lnsdale Avenue suth f Highway 1 Bulevard Crescent suth f Lynn Valley interchange* Cttn Rad east f Brksbank Keith Rad east f Brksbank Autmatic cunts: 7 days, 24 hrs/day Manual cunts: 1 day, 15 hrs Number f bicycle trips at key lcatins Number f pedestrians at key lcatins Manual bicycle cunts Manual pedestrian cunts 1 st Street east f Mackay* Lw Level Rad Esplanade St. west f Lnsdale Ave.* Marine Drive west f Hanes Ave. Bulevard Crescent suth f Lynn Valley interchange* Chesterfield Avenue at 17 th Street Lnsdale Avenue nrth f Esplanade St. Lnsdale Avenue nrth f 13 th St. Esplanade St. west f Lnsdale Ave.* Marine Drive west f Hanes Ave. Jnes Ave. nrth f 21 st St. Bulevard Crescent suth f Lynn Valley interchange* Number f transit trips TransLink TransLink transit ridership cunts n/a * = pprtunity t crdinate cunts fr multiple mdes f transprtatin 1 day in summer mnths and 1 day in winter mnths, 15 hrs 1 day in summer mnths and 1 day in winter mnths, 15 hrs 16 Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin Plan & Mnitring Strategy

19 APPENDIX A: LIST OF INITIATIVES EVALUATED Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy

20 Scale Prject ID Name Descriptin Treatment Area City-Wide 1 TDM Crdinatr/Prgram TDM Measures 2 TDM Educatin/Awareness Pamphlets TDM Measures 3 TDM Prgrams fr elementary schls TDM Measures 4 TDM Prgrams fr majr emplyers TDM Measures 5 TDM Prgrams fr secndary schls TDM Measures 6 TDM Prgrams fr small businesses TDM Measures 7 TravelSmart prgrams fr neighburhds Lwer Lnsale East/Ridgeway TDM Measures 8 TravelSmart prgrams fr neighburhds Lwer Lnsdale West TDM Measures 9 TravelSmart prgrams fr neighburhds Central Lnsdale West TDM Measures 10 TravelSmart prgrams fr neighburhds Central Lnsdale East TDM Measures 11 TravelSmart prgrams fr neighburhds Grand Bulevard/Lutet/Cedar Village TDM Measures 12 TravelSmart prgrams fr neighburhds Marine/Hamiltn TDM Measures 13 TravelSmart prgrams fr neighburhds Clverley TDM Measures 14 TravelSmart prgrams fr neighburhds Westview/Tempe TDM Measures 15 Lwer Lnsdale East Traffic Calming Plan As per Traffic Calming Plicy TCP design & implementatin 16 Westview Traffic Calming Plan As per Traffic Calming Plicy TCP design & implementatin 17 Tempe Traffic Calming Plan As per Traffic Calming Plicy TCP design & implementatin 18 Lutet Traffic Calming Plan As per Traffic Calming Plicy TCP design & implementatin 19 Cedar Village Traffic Calming Plan As per Traffic Calming Plicy TCP design & implementatin 20 Ped Precinct - Upper Lnsdale /Harry Jerme Chesterfield - St. Andrew's (21st - Highway 1) Pedestrian Precinct Treatments 21 Ped Precinct - Central Lnsdale Chesterfield - St. Gerges (8th - 21st) Pedestrian Precinct Treatments 22 Ped Precinct - Lins Gate Hspital St. Gerges - Ridgeway (12th - 17th) Pedestrian Precinct Treatments 23 Ped Precinct - Lwer Lnsdale Chesterfield - St. Gerges (3rd - 8th) Pedestrian Precinct Treatments 24 Ped Precinct - Esplanade Carrie Cates Crt - 3rd (Frbes - St. Andrew's) Pedestrian Precinct Treatments 25 Ped Precinct - Marine Drive Mackay t Bewicke (3rd - 16th) Pedestrian Precinct Treatments 26 Primary - Harburside Mackay - Bewicke (Rail - waterfrnt) Primary Area Treatments 27 Primary - Industrial/Cmmercial Precinct Mackay - Fell (1st - 3rd) Primary Area Treatments 28 Primary - St. Thmas Aquinas Bewicke - Frbes (6th - 14th) Primary Area Treatments 29 Primary - Carsn Graham Larsn - Mahn (19th - Highway 1) Primary Area Treatments 30 Primary - Sutherland W. Grand Blvd - William Ave. (17th - 21st) Primary Area Treatments 31 Primary - Keith Lynn Brksbank - Lynnmuth (suth f Keith) Secndary Area Treatments 32 Secndary - Lucas Centre/Mackay Creek Hamiltn - Fell (16th - 21st) Secndary Area Treatments 33 Secndary - Msquit Creek Edgemnt - Westview (20th - Highway 1) Secndary Area Treatments 34 Secndary - Larsn Westview - Jnes (Highway 1-28th) Secndary Area Treatments 35 Secndary - Westview Msquit Creek - Wlfe (15th - 19th) Secndary Area Treatments 36 Secndary - Mahn Park/Cnfederatin Field Wlfe - Mahn (16th - 19th) Secndary Area Treatments 37 Secndary - Wagg Creek Mahn - Chesterfield (18th - 23rd) Secndary Area Treatments 38 Secndary - Queen Mary Jnes - Chesterfield (6th - 14th) Secndary Area Treatments 39 Secndary - Queensbury Ridgeway - W. Grand Blvd (18th - Highway 1) Secndary Area Treatments 40 Secndary - Lutet/Brksbank William - Highway 1 (nrth f 14th) Secndary Area Treatments 41 Secndary - Bulevard Ridgeway - E. Grand Blvd (12th - 16th) Secndary Area Treatments 42 Secndary - Ridgeway St. Andrew's - Queensbury/W. Grand Blvd (7th - 10th) Secndary Area Treatments 43 Secndary - Ridgeway Annex St. David's - Mdy (2nd - 7th) Secndary Area Treatments 44 Secndary - Clverley Sutherland - Heywd (3rd - 7th) Secndary Area Treatments 45 Secndary - Park & Tilfrd Heywd - Brksbank (3rd - 7th) Secndary Area Treatments 46 3rd St Keith - Frbes Bicycle lanes 47 3rd St Keith - Frbes Safety and peratinal imprvements 48 3rd St Keith - Frbes Transit pririty measures

21 Scale Prject ID Name Descriptin Treatment Crridrs 49 3rd St. Chesterfield - Cttn Rd. Bus stp accessibility treatments 50 3rd St. Chesterfield - Cttn Rd. Transit pririty measures 51 3rd St./Frbes 3rd street Transit pririty measures 52 4th St. Frbes - Heywd Shared bicycle rute 53 13th St. Keith Rd - Sutherland Marked wide curb lanes 54 13th St. Chesterfield - St. Gerge's` Safety and peratinal imprvements 55 15th St. Jnes - W. Grand Blvd Bus stp accessibility treatments 56 16th St. Marine - Bewicke Marked wide curb lanes 57 16th St. Marine - Bewicke Pedestrian greenway imprvements 58 17th St. E. Grand Blvd - Rufus Shared bicycle rute 59 23rd St. Westview - Larsn Pedestrian greenway imprvements 60 23rd St. Chesterfield - St. Andrew's Shared bicycle rute 61 25th St. Westview - Jnes Pedestrian greenway imprvements 62 26th St. Tempe Knll - Wilding Shared bicycle rute 63 27th St. Jnes - 25th Shared bicycle rute 64 29th St. Lnsdale - DNV Bus stp accessibility treatments 65 Bewicke Ave. Larsn - Marine Bus stp accessibility treatments 66 Bewicke Ave. Larsn - Marine Marked wide curb lanes 67 Brksbank Ave. Cttn - Keith Bus stp accessibility treatments 68 Cttn Rd. Lw Level Rd. - Lynn Creek Bus stp accessibility treatments 69 Cttn Rd. Lw Level Rd. - Lynn Creek Pedestrian greenway imprvements 70 Cttn Rd. Lw Level Rd. - Lynn Creek Safety and peratinal imprvements 71 Cttn Rd. Lw Level Rd. - Lynn Creek Transit pririty measures 72 E. Grand Blvd./Queensbury 3rd - Lynn Valley Bus stp accessibility treatments 73 Edgemnt Blvd. / Fell Marine - 29th Bicycle lanes 74 Esplanade Ave. Frbes - Lnsdale Bus stp accessibility treatments 75 Esplanade Ave. Frbes - St. Gerge's (1st - Carrie Cates Crt) Enhanced bicycle parking 76 Esplanade Ave. Lnsdale - Lw Level Rd. Safety and peratinal imprvements 77 Esplanade Ave. Frbes - Lnsdale Pedestrian greenway imprvements 78 Esplanade Ave. Frbes - Lnsdale Safety and peratinal imprvements 79 Esplanade Ave. Frbes - Lnsdale Transit pririty measures 80 Fell Ave. 19th - Hwy 1 Pedestrian greenway imprvements 81 Fell Ave. Marine Dr. - 15th Pedestrian greenway imprvements 82 Fell Ave./Autmall Dr. Bus stp accessibility treatments 83 Frbes Ave. Esplanade - 3rd Bus stp accessibility treatments 84 Frbes Ave. Esplanade - 3rd Pedestrian greenway imprvements 85 Frbes Ave. Esplanade - 3rd Safety imprvements and bicycle lanes 86 Frbes Ave. 3rd - 4th Shared bicycle rute 87 Grand Blvd/Blvd Crescent Queensbury - Lynn Valley interchange (east and west Grand Blvd) Safety and peratinal imprvements 88 Hamiltn Ave. 15th - Marine Marked wide curb lanes 89 Hendry Ave. 3rd - Keith Shared bicycle rute 90 Jnes Ave. 13th - 15th Bus stp accessibility treatments 91 Jnes Ave. 13th - Highway 1 Pedestrian greenway imprvements 92 Jnes Ave. 3rd - Highway 1 Shared bicycle rute 93 Jnes Ave. Highway 1-29th Shared bicycle rute 94 Keith Rd. Bewicke - 13th St. Bicycle lanes 95 Keith Rd. Hendry - Brksbank Bicycle lanes 96 Keith Rd. Bewicke - 13th St. Bus stp accessibility treatments 97 Keith Rd. St. Andrew's - Brksbank Bus stp accessibility treatments 98 Keith Rd. Bewicke - 13th St. Transit pririty measures

22 Scale Prject ID Name Descriptin Treatment Specific Lcatins 99 Larsn Rd. Bewicke - Jnes Marked wide curb lanes 100 Larsn Rd. Bewicke - Jnes Safety and peratinal imprvements 101 Lnsdale Ave. Highway 1-29th Bus stp accessibility treatments 102 Lnsdale Ave. 11th - 21st Enhanced bicycle parking 103 Lnsdale Ave. Lnsdale - St Gerge's (21st - Highway 1) Enhanced bicycle parking 104 Lnsdale Ave. Highway 1-29th Marked wide curb lanes 105 Lnsdale Ave. 23rd - Highway 1 Marked wide curb lanes 106 Lnsdale Ave. Highway 1-29th Safety and peratinal imprvements 107 Lnsdale Ave. Highway 1-29th Transit pririty measures 108 Lnsdale Ave. Esplanade - Highway 1 Bus stp accessibility treatments 109 Lnsdale Ave. Esplanade - 4th Enhanced bicycle parking 110 Lnsdale Ave. Esplanade - 4th Safety and peratinal imprvements 111 Lnsdale Ave. Esplanade - Highway 1 Transit pririty measures 112 Lw Level Rad Esplanade t Kennard Rad re-prfilling and slpe stability 113 Mackay Ave. Marine Drive - 23rd Bus stp accessibility treatments 114 Mackay Ave. 1st - 18th Pedestrian greenway imprvements 115 Marine Dr. Mackay - Keith Bus stp accessibility treatments 116 Marine Dr. Mackay - Keith Enhanced bicycle parking 117 Marine Dr. Mackay - Keith Safety, peratinal and bicycle imprvements 118 Marine Dr. Mackay - Keith Transit pririty measures 119 Nrth side f Highway 1 Tempe Heights Park - Lynn Valley Shared bicycle rute 120 Queensbury Ave. 19th - 22nd Pedestrian greenway imprvements 121 Westview Dr. Larsn - 29th Bicycle lanes 122 Westview Dr. Larsn - 29th Bus stp accessibility treatments 123 Westview Dr. 23rd - 24th Pedestrian greenway imprvements 124 Wlfe St. 17th - Fir Pedestrian greenway imprvements 125 1st Fell Safety and peratinal imprvements 126 1st Hanes Safety and peratinal imprvements 127 1st Mackay Safety and peratinal imprvements 128 3rd Queensbury Safety and peratinal imprvements 129 4th Chesterfield Bicycle crssing imprvements 130 4th St. Gerge's Bicycle crssing imprvements rd St. Gerge's Safety and peratinal imprvements 132 Grand Blvd/Keith/Queensbury Intersectin Safety and peratinal imprvements 133 Pedestrian/Cyclist Highway 1 Crssing Imprvements Lynn Valley/Lutet Area Bicycle/pedestrian verpass; greenway crssing 134 Keith Brksbank Safety and peratinal imprvements 135 Mackay Creek Crssing Pedestrian greenway cnnectin 136 Mackay Drive - Autmall Drive Crssing Pedestrian/bicycle verpass 137 Msquit Creek Crssing Pedestrian greenway cnnectin 138 St. 17th Safety and peratinal imprvements 139 St. 19th Safety and peratinal imprvements

23 APPENDIX B: EVALUATION CRITERIA Lng-Term Transprtatin Plan Implementatin & Mnitring Strategy

24 Surce Measure Criteria Supprting Gals (fr OCP Plicy Paths nly) Scre Weight T encurage the develpment f the Lnsdale Reginal Twn Centre as an identifiable cre f the City with tw centres: Central and Lwer Officical Cmmunity Plan Plicy Paths A Sense f Place Land Use Transprtatin, Mbility and Access Cmmunity Well- Being Envirnment Lnsdale T enhance neighburhds utside f the Twn Centre, as apprpriate, with linkages t the Twn Centre and neighburing municipalities T create public gathering places and streets that are pedestrianfriendly, fun, attractive, safe, inclusive fr all, that accmmdate a range f public functins, and are cmpatible with the neighburhd cntext T establish a land use pattern that supprts the creatin f a cmplete cmmunity. A balance f residentail and emplyment grwth is encuraged T prvide suitable lcatins fr varius land uses, r mixes f land uses, while shielding residential and ther sensitive areas frm adverse effects T encurage the use f a variety f transprtatin chices t serve the needs f all residents and visitrs, with pririty given t transit, cycling and walking T c-rdinate land use planning and transprtatin planning, t reduce transprtatin demand T prvide a safe, cnvenient and efficient netwrk f rads, paths, greenways and pedestrian crridrs t mve gds and peple, while minimizing disruptins t the cmmunity T maintain and enhance well-being and quality f life fr all cmmunity members T supprt the independence and well-being f lder City residents T maximize pprtunities fr peple with disabilities t be full and active members f the cmmunity T demnstrate envirnmental leadership T encurage the cmmunity t adapt t a sustainable lifestyle T encurage meeting the present and future energy service needs f the cmmunity in a manner that is efficient and cst-effective; that is envirnmentally respnsible (lcally, reginally, and glbablly); and that fsters lcal ecnmic develpment. Cntributes t the 9.9 T create a linked system f parks and greenways that balances Parks & Greenways develpment f the trail and/r recreatinal use f parks and streets with sustainable eclgical and greenways netwrk transprtatin bjectives. Leisure & Culture Cmmunity Infrastructure Ecnmy & Ecnmic Develpment Municipal Financial Planning Prvides pedestrian-friendly cnnectins between neighburhds and t the cre f the City Supprts a variety f land uses, including residential, cmmercial, industrial, and institutinal Encurages the safe, cnvenient, and efficient use f a variety f transprtatin chices, with pririty given t transit, cycling, and walking Supprts mbility, accessibility, and safety fr all members f the ppulatin, including yuth, the elderly, and peple with disabilities. Reduces energy needs and cntributes t reductin f lcal Greenhuse Gas emissins. Supprts and prvides access t cmmunify facilities, such as recreatin centres, and cultural facilities T supprt and enhance leisure, and culture as vital aspects f cmmunity life, including life-lng learning, recreatin, cmmunity events, and arts and culture T prvide the citizens, businesses and visitrs with public Prvides infrastructure that infrastructure that imprves the quality f life and prtects the natural imprves quality f life and envirnment at an affrdable cst. prtects the envirnment at an affrdable cst T perate and maintain the infrastructure t acceptable standards. Supprts majr emplyment areas and businesses in the Twn Centre 12.5 T maintain a strng and diverse lcal ecnmy capable f supprting a cmplete cmmunity. 0 = N 1 = Yes 0 = N 1 = Yes 0 = N 1 = Yes 0 = N 1 = Yes 0 = N 1 = Yes 0 = N 1 = Yes 0 = N 1 = Yes 0 = N 1 = Yes 0 = N 1 = Yes Ensures that sufficient funding is prvided ver the lng-term 0 = N 13.3 T ensure that sufficient funding is prvided ver the lng-term s that s that infrastructure can be 1 = Yes services and infrastructure can be sustained at the required level t sustained maximize value t the citizens f the City Relative Safety Benefits Degree t which the treatment will imprve safety cnditins n/a fr all user grups. 1 = Lw 2 = Limited 3 = Mderate 4 = High 3 Other Criteria Relative Cst Assessment f the relative cst f each treatment n/a 1 = >$500,000 2 = $250,000-$500,000 3 = $100,000-$250,000 4 = <$100,000 1 Multi-Mdal Integratin Opprtunities fr benefits t n/a ther mdes f transprtatin 1 = N ther mdes 2 = 1 ther mde 3 = 2 ther mdes 4 = 3 r mre mdes 3