Chris e Zimmer made a mo on to include Alterna ve G (modified to include grade separa on at signalized

Transcription

1 MOBILITY 2040: A Vision for the SR 54/56 Corridor Phase 1: Defining the Alternatives East Task Force Meeting Thursday, March 31, 2016 (5:30 7:30 PM) Rasmussen College, Room # Fernview Street, Land O Lakes, FL Summary of Acons Taken The Task Force reviewed the results of the East Task Force survey of alternaves. The results of the survey responses le Alternave D and Alternave C ed with 2 votes each and a weighted score of 7. The Task Force members came to the consensus that the no-build alternave, Alternave J, would be included in their final recommendaon to the MPO Board as one of the six alternaves. With the e of Alternave D and Alternave C, the Task Force members voted on the remaining alternaves individually in developing a consensus recommendaon to the MPO Board. These alternaves were voted on in order of the weighted results from the East Task Force Survey. Robb Sercu made a moon that the Task Force recommend the add-on alternaves for Alternave Intersecon Design, including the Parallel Flow Intersecon concept presented by GFParsons, and Frontage/Service/Bypass Road to the MPO Board. The moon was seconded by Fred Krauer and passed unanimously. Robb Sercu made a moon to include Alternave H: Maintaining Exisng 6 General Purpose Lanes and At Grade Exclusive Transit in Dedicated Guideway in the Task Force Recommendaon to the MPO Board. Aer a second by Fred Krauer, this moon passed unanimously. Chrise Zimmer made a moon to include Alternave F (modified to include grade separaon at signalized intersecons): At-Grade Express Lanes; Express Bus/Other Bus Service in Express Lanes in the Task Force Recommendaon to the MPO Board. Aer a second by Fred Krauer, this moon passed unanimously. Robb Sercu made a moon to include Alternave B Grade Major Intersecons and At Grade Rail or Exclusive BRT using same overpasses in the Task Force Recommendaon to the MPO Board. Aer a second by Chrise Zimmer, this moon passed unanimously. Chrise Zimmer made a moon to include Alternave G (modified to include grade separaon at signalized intersecons): At Grade Express Lanes and Express Bus in Express Lanes and BRT or Rail in Dedicated Guideway in the Task Force Recommendaon to the MPO Board. Aer a second by Robb Sercu, this moon passed by a vote of 4-1. Robb Sercu made a moon to include Alternave D: Elevated Express Lanes and Express Bus/Other Service in Express Lanes in the Task Force Recommendaon to the MPO Board. Aer a second by Hope Allen, this moon passed by a vote of 4-1. In Summary, the top 6 alternaves recommended by the East Task Force include: - Alternave B: Grade Major Intersecons and At Grade Rail or Exclusive BRT and Uses Same Grade Separated Overpasses - Alternave D: Elevated Express Lanes and Express Bus/Other Service in Express Lanes Page 1

2 - Alternave F (Modified to include grade separaon at signalized intersecons): At-Grade Express Lanes; Express Bus/Other Bus Service in Express Lanes - Alternave G (Modified to include grade separaon at signalized intersecons): At Grade Express Lanes and Express Bus in Express Lanes and BRT or Rail in Dedicated Guideway - Alternave H: Maintaining Exisng 6 General Purpose Lanes and At Grade Exclusive Transit in Dedicated Guideway - Alternave J: Maintain Exisng 6 General Purpose Lanes (no build) and maintain Local Bus The following table indicates the survey results from the East Task Force and highlights the alternaves recommended to the MPO Board. Following the table is a series of graphics depicng the conceptual rendering for each recommended alternave. Page 2

3 East Segment Survey Results Pasco County MPO Vision 54/56: Phase I Alternative Name Ranked 1 Ranked 2 Ranked 3 Ranked 4 Ranked 5 Votes Weight Votes Weight Votes Weight Votes Weight Votes Weight Response Count Weighted Score Alternative Description Alternative H Alternative J Alternative F (Modified)* Alternative B Maintaining Existing 6 General Purpose Lanes and At Grade Exclusive BRT or Rail in Dedicated Guideway Maintaining Existing 6 General Purpose Lanes (no build) and Maintaining Local Bus Service At Grade Express Lanes and Express Bus/Other Bus Service in Express Lanes Grade Major Intersections and At Grade Rail or Exclusive BRT and Uses Same Grade Separated Overpasses Alternative G (Modified)* Alternative D Alternative C Alternative A Alternative E At Grade Express Lanes and Express Bus in Express Lanes and BRT or Rail in Dedicated Guideway Elevated Express Lanes and Express Bus/Other Bus Service in Express Lanes Elevated Express Lanes and Local Buses Remain at Grade and No Transit on Elevated Lanes Grade Major Intersections and Maintains Local Bus Service with Local Buses Using the overpasses Transit Signal Priority/Intersection Queue Jumps and Express Bus or BRT Light Maintaining Existing 6 General Purpose Lanes and Elevated Exclusive BRT or Rail Alternative I in Dedicated Guideway Other: Alternative Other: Alternative * - Modified to include grade separation at signalized intersections. Alternatives included in West Task Force Recommendation

4 Alt B

5 Alt D

6 Alt F (modified)

7 Alt G (modified)

8 Alt H