Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Similar documents
Community Task Force October 5, 2017

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

BID Workshop September 12, 2017

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Community Task Force August 8, 2018

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

BRT for Berkeley A Proposal for Consideration

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

6 Screen 3 Analysis and Results

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018

Better Market Street Project Update. Urban Forestry Council September 17, 2014

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

North Avenue Corridor Study

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

MAYFIELD ROAD CORRIDOR MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Public Workshop

Living Streets Policy

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Planning Study SR 976. Project Advisory Team Meeting May 24, 2017

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

ALTERNATIVES SCREENING REPORT

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Update June 2018 OUR 2017 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

Central Freeway and Octavia Circulation Study


RapidRide Roosevelt Seat Sea t t le t le Depa De r pa t r men men t of Sept T an r sp an or sp t or a t t a ion

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Transit Planning at 3 Scales: the Network, Corridor, and Station Levels

Moving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Transportation Assessment

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee

BALBOA AREA: TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS & PLANNING

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

San Jose Transportation Policy

PROJECT OVERVIEW. Auburn Station Access Improvements Project

Commerce Street Complete Street Project from Good Latimer Expressway to Exposition Avenue

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #RegionalMobility

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Complete Streets. Complete Streets and other City Initiatives. City & County Initiatives. Honolulu Complete Streets Program

Road Diets FDOT Process

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

SFMTA SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Roadways. Roadways III.

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

THIRD&GRAND. Public Workshop #1. Transportation Hub Area Plan. June 12, 2013

FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2011

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

Beach Cities Living Streets Design Manual and Aviation Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Plan

9/25/2018. Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) Bianca Popescu, Transportation Planner

Vermont Rail conversion/feasibility Study

Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

Baseline Road Rapid Transit: Bayshore Station to Prince of Wales Drive

UNIVERSITY AVENUE CORRIDOR REDESIGN. January 8, 2017 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

WELCOME. Purpose of the Open House. Update you on the project. Present a draft recommended plan. Receive your input

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Base Information. 1. Project Title SH7/East Arapahoe Multi-Use Path and Transit Stop Improvements. 2. Project Start/End points or Geographic Area

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

Transcription:

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Welcome and Introductions

Project Partners Regional Transportation District (RTD) Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) City of Aurora

Meeting Purpose and Agenda

Meeting Purpose Overview of project background and progress to-date Review updated analysis and design concepts for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on Colfax Gather initial Task Force input and identify key questions Outline the path forward

Agenda Task Force Roles and Expectations Project History Project Evolution Q&A Next Steps

Role of the Community Task Force

Community Task Force Roles and Expectations Represent your community Bring ideas Respect the ideas of others Be available Share information

Project History: How we got here

Purpose of the Project To identify and provide a package of multimodal transportation improvements in the East Colfax corridor that: Improve mobility, connectivity, safety, and accessibility Meet current and future person-trip demand Encourage a shift of auto trips to alternative modes Interact seamlessly, efficiently, and safely with other transportation corridors, systems, and modes Are consistent with area economic development, placemaking/streetscaping and liveability plans and principles 10

Study Area

Key Challenges and Opportunities Moving more people along and to destinations along East Colfax without adding lanes or taking property Growth of Denver region even greater than expected Very high Colfax corridor ridership today (22,000 / weekday)

Why is This Project Needed? (2010 to 2035)

Why is This Project Needed? * * (2010 to 2035) *ridership includes 10, 20, and 15 & 15L

Project Background Study began in 2012 Public Scoping (2012) Alternatives Analysis (2013) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) identified (2014) Side-Running BRT using peak-period lanes (2016)

Community and Agency Feedback Supported Outcomes Doubles existing ridership Increases person-trip capacity Reduces transit travel time Reliability Enhanced Passenger Experience Opportunities for Improvement Be bold think long term 24-hour transit lane Placemaking opportunity to reimagine Colfax as Main Street Prioritize pedestrians and bicycle safety and access (Vision Zero)

Project Evolution: Where we re going

Project Evolution Side-Running BRT concept refined based on community input, project goals and mobility needs Analyzed potential alternative options Center-Running BRT design better addresses key community, safety and mobility priorities

Center-Running BRT Healthline BRT, Cleveland

Center-Running BRT Healthline, Cleveland, OH EmX, Eugene-Springfield, OR Orange Line, Los Angeles, CA MAX, Las Vegas, NV

Center-Running BRT Geary BRT & Van Ness BRT, San Francisco

The Colfax BRT Opportunity

The Colfax BRT Opportunity Center-Running Exclusive Lanes Denver Aurora

The Colfax BRT Opportunity

The Colfax BRT Opportunity

The Colfax BRT Opportunity A SAFE Street Vision Zero Pedestrian-first design A Street for PEOPLE Create spaces for active neighborhood centers Open sidewalks for retail and pedestrian uses A Street with Transit at its HEART Efficient, reliable and comfortable operations Long-lasting redevelopment and mobility benefits A Street that WORKS Move more people, not just vehicles Improve mobility for all modes of transportation

A SAFE Street Vision Zero Island stations calm traffic Pedestrian refuges reduce crossing distance Shorter crossing distances = less exposure to vehicle traffic Eliminating unprotected lefts improves pedestrian safety Station lighting enhances security Healthline, Cleveland, OH Madison BRT, Seattle

A SAFE Street Pedestrian/Bicycle first design Improved multi-modal access and connectivity Designs that protect the most vulnerable users Safer, more accessible, walkable and bikeable neighborhoods HealthLine BRT passengers crossing from a center station platform near the Cleveland Clinic

A Street for PEOPLE Creating Strong Neighborhood Centers Frees sidewalk space for retail and community activation Increases opportunity for public art and streetscape improvements Placemaking increases property values Colfax: Curb Bus Stations Limit Public Realm Ops Euclid Avenue, Cleveland

Colfax: Existing Conditions

A Street with Transit at its HEART Transit Speed and Reliability Eliminates many curbside conflicts Future proofing as land-use, traffic, and curb uses change Frequent service (every 3-5 minutes) High quality stations EmX, Eugene-Springfield, OR

A Street with Transit at its HEART Corridor Redevelopment Transit Oriented Development Conveys sense of permanence High-profile public investment attracts private investment Increased access to Jobs

A Street with Transit at its HEART Affordable Housing Transit corridors provide best opportunity for development of affordable housing DHA s current strategy is to locate housing near high capacity transit. 10 th and Osage Station

A Street that WORKS Transit Capacity & Ridership Current bus ridership more than doubles Colfax BRT projected ridership of up to 50,000 by 2035 Shift from vehicles to transit due to improved travel times, reliability and convenience of BRT Improved transit travel times up to 15 minutes faster during peak periods in 2035 than if we do nothing

A Street that WORKS Transit Capacity & Ridership HealthLine (Cleveland): 48% ridership increase EmX (Eugene): 100% ridership increase in 1 st year of operations Orange Line (Los Angeles): Achieved 15-year forecast of 20,000+ riders in first seven months

Conceptual Operations

Screen 3 Plus Results Summary

Potential Evaluation Criteria for Additional Screening Placemaking Conflicts Vision Zero Travel Time Reliability Future Proofing Expansion Potential Traffic Business Access Cost Passenger Experience Walk Access Transit Operating Cost Agency Support Community Support

Questions?

Next Steps

Where Do We Go From Here? Identify Local/Regional Funding Sources Compete for Federal Funding Gather community feedback and complete more detailed design and implementation schedule* Next Task Force Meeting: September *requires environmental clearance by Federal Transit Administration and funding availability

www.colfaxcorridorconnections.com Info@ColfaxCorridorConnections.com