Chapter 10: Future Transportation System

Transcription

1 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Chapter 10: Future Travel Demand Model and the Forecasting Process The urban area travel demand modeling process for was a cooperative effort between the Area Study (KATS), the Michigan Department of (MDOT), Statewide and Urban Travel Analysis Section, and a consultant team lead by Cambridge atics. KATS provided the lead role in the process and assumed responsibility for modeling activities with both agencies reaching consensus on selective process decisions. travel demand models are driven, in part, by the relationship of land use activities to the transportation network. Specific inputs of the modeling process are land use activity, including the number of households, vehicles, and employment (Retail, Service and Other) located in a given traffic zone. The modeling process translates this data into vehicle trips on the modeled transportation network. Sets of demographic data were developed to establish the 2010 base year transportation model, the forecast year travel demand model, and intermediate target year models for 2015, 2020,,,,, and. A further discussion of the modeling process, including Network Development, Analysis Zone Structure, Household Survey Processing, and Socio-economic Data Development is provided in Appendix E: Travel Demand Model. The forecasting and distribution of future households and employment data cannot be made with pin point accuracy due to the nature of the data sources, changes in development plans, unforeseen economic or population factors, and the limits imposed by time and financial resources. Although efforts were made to allocate the data as accurately as possible, in a few instances, due to minor errors in address coding or unidentifiable employer names or addresses, some of the employment data allocated to one zone may actually belong in an adjacent zone. This does not change the overall effect of travel demand on the model because travel activity would be loaded onto the same adjacent network corridor. Therefore, household and employment data for individual zones should be considered as an estimate to be used as a guideline and not an exact total. Deficiency Analysis The identification of system deficiencies is a prerequisite for the examination of alternatives and selection of projects for the politan Plan. The traditional transportation plan development process addressed deficiency analysis near exclusively through the modeling process. While this is still a key analytical tool, the management systems, basic traffic engineering analysis, and other approaches have advanced in relative importance. This advancement has been promoted by the increasing necessity to preserve (and improve) the structural and functional integrity of the existing system. Sensitivity to social, environmental, and economic factors place increased emphasis on making better use of the existing system. demand was estimated for the Plan base year of 2010 and for interval years to. demand was estimated and assigned to the Area Study (KATS) transportation network of federal aid eligible roads using TransCAD software. The majority of the segments showing capacity deficiencies are part of the trunkline system, since these roads generally have higher volumes. Because of the KATS s goal to emphasize preserving the system instead of adding to it, segments showing future volumes to capacities ratio greater than 1.00 will be the ones considered to be deficient for capacity in the Plan Many of the road segments that have future volume to capacity ratios greater than 1.0 are not included in the politan Plan proposed capacity project list. The following table includes capacity deficient road segments that following review were not included in the funded capacity projects. Reasons for not including these projects for added lanes include limited right-of-way, fronting property uses that make widening impractical, financial difficulties, and other community goals and values. Adopted: Date Page 71

2 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Model Capacity Deficiencies Road Name Location Proposed Action Management, D From N US-131 Ramp to 12th St. Access Management M-43 From Mills St. to Michigan Ave. Historic Structure, Management From M-40 to VanKal Ave. Management, Access Management From 8th St. to US 131 Management, Access Management From Sage to Northampton Management, Access Management E. C to North County Line management, Access Management, Right-of-way Constraints Howard Street From Stadium Dr. to Van De Giessen Management, proposed near term intersection project US 131 From Shaver Rd to VW Ave management, Access Management, Right-of-way Constraints M-89 From Kimberly to 34th Management, Access Management From 37th to 38th Management, Access Management From 42nd to 44th Management, Access Management M-96 From 35th St. to 37th St. Management, Access Management, Right-of-way Constraints Sprinkle Road From I-94 to I-94 BL Management, Access Management Stadium Drive From 9th St. to Parkview Ave. Management, Access Management From 11th St to US 131 Ramp Management, Access Management From US 131 Ramp to Drake Rd. Management, Access Management Oakland Drive From Kilgore Rd. to Skyler Rd. Management, Access Management, Right-of-way Constraints From I-94 to W. Milham Rd. Management, Access Management, Right-of-way Constraints 9th Street From KL Ave to Buckham Wood Management I-94 Ramps From US131 to Sprinkle Road- multiple locations Management Adopted: Date Page 72

3 M 51 County Road th St M 40 33rd St 25th St S Van Kal St S 8th St S 12th St Douglas Ave Sprinkle Rd S 42nd St N 12th St Oakland Dr S 6th St S 9th St N 9th St N 10th St N Drake Rd N US 131 Solon St Duke St S Westnedge Ave S Westnedge Ave N Park St S Burdick St S Park St Lovers Ln Portage Rd Nazareth Rd N 32nd St S 34th St N 24th St S 24th St N 28th St S 29th St N 33rd St Brook Dr N 25th St S 26th St N 35th St N 27th St S 29th St S 31st St S 32nd St S 36th St S 35th St S 40th St N 40th St S 44th St Network Deficiencies - Existing Plus Committed Ravine Rd E A B Ave Richplain Rd M 43 Gull Lake Dr E Legend Deficiencies Federal Aid Roads Non-Federal Aid Roads Rivers & Lakes City Village Deficiency refers to road segments where volume over capacity is greater than one. E I 94 County Road 374 W Red Arrow Hwy M 43 County Road 358 County Road 653 M 40 W I 94 26th St E Red Arrow Hwy E 3rd St 72nd Ave County Road 657 County Road 375 Front St County Road 652 E McGillen St N 2nd St Almena Dr N 2nd St W P Ave W D Ave S 3rd St S 3rd St S 4th St N 4th St Stadium Ave W O P Ave 5th St N 6th St W Main St S 8th St W K L Ave W O Ave W Q Ave W N Ave 82 W H Ave 9th St S 11th St Texas Dr S Bus US 131 S Drake Rd W O N Ave N US 131 S US 131 Stadium Dr Parkview Ave Angling Rd Ravine Rd Alamo Ave W Michigan Ave W Milham Ave W Centre Ave Winchell Ave Angling Rd Vincent Dr N Bus US 131 Howard St Bronson Blvd Romence Rd Shaver Rd N Westnedge Ave Mall Dr Schuring Rd W Osterhout Ave N Pitcher St E North St Portage St Reed Ave E Alcott St Bacon Ave King Hwy E D Ave Mount Olivet Rd N Riverview Dr Humphrey St E Miller Rd E Cork St E Milham Ave Forest Dr Lake St Mandigo Ave I 94 BL E Kilgore Rd E Centre Ave Zylman Ave Lake St Romence Rd E E Shore Dr E H Ave River St N 26th St I 94 BL E P Ave 25th St S E S Ave E T U Ave E Ml Ave Qr Ave E T Ave E D Ave E C Ave Gull Rd E Main St E Michigan Ave E P Q Ave E M L Ave E G Ave E N Ave E Ml Ave Q Ave E M 89 W Gull Lake Dr W Michigan Ave W I 94 E D Ave N 37th St N 37th St E Augusta Dr E I 94 E Michigan Ave S 38th St E M N Ave E D Ave N 42nd St N Augusta Ave E R Ave S 43rd St E Q Ave S Main St N Augusta Dr S 44th St E Michigan Ave N Main St E Augusta Dr Mercury Dr E O N Ave W County Line Rd W U Ave E U Ave E U Ave E U V Ave Miles W W Ave E Lyon St E Eliza St W V W Ave W W Ave E W Ave E V W Ave N Richardson St E V Ave E W Ave E X Ave W X Y Ave February 2016 Source: Michigan Geographic Data Library Area Study E Y Ave

4 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 This page intentionally left blank-map wrong side. Adopted: Date Page 74

5 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Road Condition Deficiencies The Area Study, in cooperation with the Michigan Department of, the Road Commission of County, and the cities of and Portage rate the surface condition of all federal-aid roads in County over a two year period as part of the KATS pavement management system. The pavement management system used in County is the PASER system 10. This system is being used throughout the State of Michigan and is maintained through the Michigan Department of Asset Management Council and Michigan Technology Institute. Deficiencies in the Road system are further discussed in Chapter 11 of this plan. Deficiencies The identification of public transportation system deficiencies is accomplished differently than the identification of road system deficiencies. The public transportation system deficiencies can involve limitations in areas covered by public transportation service and more demand for service than the system can handle. Since the entire politan Planning area has public transportation service available through the combination of fixed route and its associated ADA service in the urban area and demand response service, no area in the MPO is excluded from public transportation. market surveys and other public comment has identified the desire to increase the service levels provided. These desired increased service levels include: Adding service on Sundays. Increasing the hours of service to cover third shift workers or late night business. Linking rural areas to fixed route service. The lack of these identified service level increases can be considered unmet needs or public transportation deficiencies. To address this need,, in partnership with the Central County Authority and the County Authority will begin Sunday and later hour service in A deficiency noted in the Human Services Coordinated Plan to improve bus shelters is being addressed through a bus stop shelter replacement program and an adopt a shelter program. Current service levels of public transportation will be maintained under this plan. Alternatives Analysis KATS develops a forecast of population and employment to project the impact of growth on the transportation system using a travel demand model. The KAT s forecasts are based on existing master plans and current economic forecasts rather than a comprehensive regional growth management strategy. Through the process of developing future transportation alternatives, KATS solicited projects from local agencies to create a pool of proposed and illustrative projects. KATS then analyzed several combinations of these proposed projects and alternative modes of transportation. Through this process, four scenarios were chosen for further analysis and discussion. Scenario 1: Existing plus Committed (EC) Projects This scenario looks at the existing transportation system, along with those capacity projects with funding already committed. It can be looked at as a status quo alternative. Scenario 2: EC- Constrained This scenario is based on the financial realities of the politan Area, explained more in Chapter 11. This scenario includes only capacity changing projects that can be handled via regular maintenance or rehabilitation work without the need to move the curb (i.e. Road Diet). Scenario 3: EC- Financially Unconstrained This scenario represents a financially unconstrained look at the future transportation system. All proposed projects were included to create a wish list alternative. Adopted: Date Page 75

6 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Scenario 4: EC- Emphasis This scenario represents a financially unconstrained look at increased transit ridership. Through the travel demand model, KATS analyzed the impact on the roadway system if current transit ridership doubled over the life of the politan Plan. Since the cost of this scenario is nearly impossible to predict, due to the multiple factors that could lead to increased transit ridership (marketing, service expansion, fuel costs, etc.), it is an illustrative look at the impact transit ridership can have on the transportation system. Outcomes Looking at the four alternatives, the Emphasis model has the most dramatic results. Since this Alternative is an illustrative look, further study needs to be completed in future iterations of this plan to assess the cost needed to dramatically increase transit ridership. The remaining three alternatives are very similar, with only a slight difference in Congested Hours Traveled, Hours of Congestion Delay, and total Miles Traveled. The chart below looks at the impacts of each of the scenarios on the vehicle hours traveled in congestion. The chart shows the impact of the Emphasis scenario compared to the other three scenarios. However, the difference between the low and high numbers, 261,576 and 263,419 respectively, are still very small (less than 1%). 264,000 Congested Hours Traveled 263, , , , , , ,500 Existing Plus Committed Existing Plus Committed- Constrained Existing Plus Committed- Unconstrained Emphasis Adopted: Date Page 76

7 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Another way to look at the scenarios is through the hours of congestion delay. This is where the constrained scenario shows limitations on its ability (due to lack of widening) at reducing delay. Once again, the difference between the scenarios is negligible, 24,089 and 25, ,400 25,200 25,000 24,800 24,600 24,400 24,200 24,000 23,800 23,600 23,400 Existing Plus Committed Hours of Congestion Delay Existing Plus Committed- Constrained Existing Plus Committed- Unconstrained Emphasis The overall Miles Traveled (VMT) also shows very little difference between scenarios. As to be expected, the Emphasis scenario shows the least total VMT for the model year. The difference between the lowest, Emphasis 9,419,912, and the highest, Unconstrained 9,455,568, is still very minimal (less than 0.4%). 9,460,000 Miles Traveled 9,450,000 9,440,000 9,430,000 9,420,000 9,410,000 9,400,000 Existing Plus Committed Existing Plus Committed- Constrained Existing Plus Committed- Unconstrained Emphasis It is important to note the model does not reflect any change in the way people make their transportation choices. A strategic shift to invest in alternative modes of transportation such as transit and non-motorized would increase the attractiveness of those options by being more convenient. That would result in much higher Adopted: Date Page 77

8 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 utilization rates of non-single occupant vehicles and maximize the investment, as well as provide air quality benefits, preserve roadway condition, improve health through physical activity and many more benefits. KATS will continue to investigate the potential impacts of different land use patterns to help in identifying and refining regional priorities and how to better incorporate those priorities into the Planning Process. Due to the limited future impact between the proposed scenarios, the holistic need for additional capacity seems very limited when weighed against the financial shortfalls in maintaining the current system. KATS Project Ranking Process This scoring process was used to assist in the ranking of worthy roadway, public transportation, bicycle, pedestrian, freight and operational projects for the KATS politan Plan. This process provided a systematic approach to ranking the numerous projects submitted to KATS and assisted in the development of project scenarios A numeric ranking for each project allows for a relative comparison between projects. This scoring process is meant to guide decision-making. Since the politan Plan does not directly assign funding to projects, this ranking is for planning purposes in developing the fiscally constrained and illustrative project lists. Several criteria are evaluated in the scoring process. The first five criteria apply to all projects and provide a potential of 30 points. A project is then scored under the roadway or transit sections, all of which provide a potential for another 20 points for a total possible 50 points. A description of the criteria and the KATS politan Plan project scoring process follows. Overall Criteria There are five criteria that provide a potential of 30 points to each transportation project recommendation: Environmental Justice The environmental justice criterion addresses the possible transportation impacts on minority, elderly, low income, disabled and/or zero-car household populations. Impacts could include such things as effects on travel times, division of neighborhoods, and change in noise and/or air pollution, which may occur as a result of project implementation. Projects are awarded point values as follows: Positive impact No impact Negative impact 5 points 0 points -5 points Economic Vitality The economic vitality criterion awards points for projects that serve to support existing, expanding or new nonretail employment centers. Projects are awarded point values by demonstrating: Significant positive impact for new/expanding economic activity Support for existing economic activity Projects not demonstrating a significant positive impact 5 points 2 points 0 points Air Quality/Congestion The air quality/congestion criterion relates to continued efforts to improve the region s air quality and encourage investment in more environmentally friendly forms of fuel use. Reduction in vehicle miles of travel (VMT), vehicle hours of travel (VHT), and the use of cleaner vehicles will be considered in the allocation of up to 10 points based on anticipated reduction of vehicle emissions. A maximum score of 10 points could be awarded for projects involving a location with high average daily traffic (ADT), a high percentage of trucks, high current congestion, and a potential for a large improvement in congestion due to project implementation. Examples of potential improvements include construction of a new roadway link reducing circuitous travel (VMT reduced) consistent with the KATS Congestion Management Process, additional intersection turn lanes (VHT reduced), addition of a new bus on an existing route reducing headway (VMT and VHT reduced), or the replacement of older diesel buses with new hybrid electric buses (cleaner vehicles). Projects are awarded point values as follows: Adopted: Date Page 78

9 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Significant VMT/VHT reduction and increase cleaner vehicles Moderate VMT/VHT reduction and/or increase in cleaner vehicles Low VMT/VHT reduction and/or increase in cleaner vehicles Increase in VMT/VHT or decrease in clean vehicles 10 points 5 points 1 point -5 points Complete Streets/Multimodal/Intermodal The complete streets/multimodal/intermodal criterion awards points based on the project s ability to include or enhance more than the primary mode or specifically address freight intermodal needs. If the proposed project facilitates intermodal integration and connectivity, or includes design elements for more than one transportation mode up to 5 points may be awarded. An example of multimodal integration as well as a complete street improvement would be a roadway reconstruction project that creates adequate space for bicycle use, even though a formal bike path is not part of the design. Another example would be a bus purchase by a transit operator where the specifications called for bicycle racks to be included. An example of multimodal investment is a roadway project that provides bus turnouts at designated bus stops, or a bus preemption feature in the traffic signal design. If a transit operator proposed a project for a park-and-ride lot/transfer center that included a linkage to an existing bike path and provided bike racks, the maximum of 5 points could be scored for this intermodal project. Projects are awarded point values as follows: Three or more modes or intermodal freight project Two mode design Primary mode only included in project proposal 5 points 3 points 0 points Environmental Impact The environmental impact criterion addresses the impact transportation projects may have on environmentally sensitive areas. Input received through the environmental consultation process informs the score for this element. Up to five points are awarded. Projects are awarded point values as follows: Project avoids environmentally sensitive area(s) Any environmental impact(s) will be mitigated Environmental impact(s) will not be mitigated 5 points 3 points -5 points Roadway Projects There are four criteria that provide a potential of 20 points to each roadway-specific transportation project recommendation: Impact on Safety The scoring process also takes into consideration the extent to which the project will have a positive impact on improving the level of safety for roadway travelers. The impact on safety criterion ranges from one to five points and is based off the most recent five year average number of crashes per million vehicle miles traveled (MVMT) and the overall impact on safety. New facilities will be scored based on existing routes that the project is designed to alleviate, if any. Projects are awarded point values as follows: Step 1 5 or more crashes per MVMT 2 points 4 or less crashes per MVMT 1 point Step 2 High positive impact on improving safety Medium or low positive impact on improving safety No positive impact on improving safety 3 points 2 points 0 points Average Daily (ADT)/Facility Type The average daily traffic (ADT) or facility type criterion combines two features which are a barometer of a roadway s significance in the regional system. This combination allows for the consideration of both current Adopted: Date Page 79

10 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 volume and functional hierarchy. This combination permits the roadways with high volumes to be assigned a high score even if the facility is not high on the functional class system. ADT and functional class are both readily available data. High volume roadways on the interstate system will score highly (up to 5 points) and low volume local roads will be scored zero. Projects are awarded the highest point value of either data source as follows: 40k+ or Freeway/Expressway 5 points 30k+ or Principal Arterial 4 points 20k+ or Minor Arterial 3 points 10k+ or Collector 2 points Less than 10k or Local 0 points of the The extent to which the proposed project preserves the functional, structural, and operational integrity of the transportation network. Up to five points are awarded. Projects are awarded point values as follows: Project with Operational Improvements project only Capacity project (as defined by the Interagency Workgroup) 5 points 3 points 1 point Freight Volume The freight volumes criterion provides points for roadway projects based on the current or projected percentage of truck traffic within the project area. Up to five points are awarded. Projects are awarded point values as follows: Twelve percent truck traffic or greater Nine percent to <12% truck traffic Six percent to <9% truck traffic Three percent to <6% truck traffic One percent to <3% truck traffic Less than 1% truck traffic 5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points Projects There are four criteria that provide a potential of 20 points to each public transportation or transit-specific transportation project recommendation: Type The type of project being sought relates to the score assigned. The term type may include but not necessarily be limited to vehicle replacement, service support, fixed facilities such as park and ride, stations or bus barns and vehicle expansion. The range reflects the importance of maintaining and supporting the existing service, as opposed to expansion activities. Projects can receive up to 5 points in this category as follows: Bus replacement Service support Fixed facility expansion Other 5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point Ridership Impact An important component of transit projects is their ridership impact. Investments should be oriented to at least maintaining the existing ridership, if not increasing it. The point values assigned the different measures of this criterion echo this philosophy and are awarded as follows: Increases ridership Maintains ridership Negative impact on ridership 5 points 0 points -5 points Adopted: Date Page 80

11 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Safety/Security The safety and security criterion awards points to projects that can be linked to improving safety conditions. The existing safety and security problem must be documented along with a plan to address these problems. Up to 5 points are available and are awarded as follows: Essential to safety/security Moderately impacts safety/security No to minimal impact on safety/security Decrease level of safety/security 5 points 3 points 0 points -5 points Timing and Analysis Level The sooner a proposal can be put in place, the sooner its impact will be felt in the region. Improvements to, or expansion of the system, such as opening new transit hubs, that are anticipated to be implemented within ten years are awarded 5 points. Those projects anticipated to be implemented after ten years and are included in a local planning study or transit development plan are awarded three points. Those that are anticipated to be implemented after ten years and are not included in a local planning study or transit development plan are awarded zero points. The point values for timing and analysis level are summarized as follows: Near term (<10 years) Mid/long term and part of local plan (10+ years) Mid/long term and not part of local plan (10+ years) 5 points 3 points 0 points Adopted: Date Page 81

12 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 politan Plan Constrained Project List Capacity Kilgore Road Kilgore Service Road to Sprinkle Capacity RCKC E. Main Street Wallace to Nazareth Road resurfacing, road diet to connect future non- motorized facilities, new sidewalk construction Signal Safety Improvements with $911 $1, RCKC 9th Street I-94 to Meridian Mill/ HMA overlay $1,300 RCKC 42nd Street Y to W RCKC U Over Portage Creek RCKC W Over Portage River RCKC D Over River RCKC East Michigan Over River RCKC Q Over Portage River RCKC S Over Portage River MDOT I-94 at East Michigan (40th Street) East Michigan Riverview to Wallace Construct to an all season road. $980 Bridge Rehabilitation $700 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Bridge Preventative Maintenance $220 $150 Bridge Rehabilitation $580 Bridge $805 Bridge $1,020 JN Interchange reconfiguration with removal and replacement of the structure and maintenance of the traffic concepts. Road resurfacing, curb and gutter replacement, striping for bike lanes. Coordinated with East Main safety project to improve intersection $11,100 $ MDOT I-94 at East Michigan (40th Street) Local Agencies locations MDOT Portage Road freeways Pitcher to Kilgore County JN Replace bridge $4,538 $20,005 upgrades. JN Freeway signing upgrade Subtotal 2016 Road Projects $47, Bus Shelters Ridesharing Mobility Management Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Operating of Ridesharing Mobility Management $1,063 $2,461 $15 $46 $58 Adopted: Date Page 82

13 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ Van Buren Operating Assistance - Rural Service Service Van Facility expansion Fixed Demand Response s Facility Renovations Security Maintenance and Upgrades ITS Equipment Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural - Fixed Route and Demand Response Urban Service Service Van Fixed route bus replacements $165 $16,520 $30 $40 $150 $513 Up to 6 Demand $127 Response Van Up to 2 Demand $71 Response s ($24,748 STL funds identified in TIP = $30,926 Total); ($32,204 STU funds identified in TIP = $40,255) Facility renovations $50 Facility security maintenance and upgrades ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Maintenance/Staff Subtotal 2016 Projects $17,985 Total 2016 Road and Projects $65, RCKC 28th Street South of E to D RCKC Stadium Drive 9th Street to US- 131 RCKC 33rd Street M-96 to G RCKC 42nd Street Z to Y Pulverize/ HMA overlay/ Construct to All Season $100 $40 $60 $900 Reconstruct/pulverize $1,500 Mill/ HMA Overlay $550 Construct to an all season road. $ RCKC N Sprinkle Road to 26th Street Vine Street Westnedge to Crosstown Mill/ HMA Overlay Roadside Improvement Road resurfacing, bike lanes and sharrows $800 $ Portage Road Sheridan to Stockbridge Road resurfacing, nonmotorized connection from Miller to Phillips $1,162 Adopted: Date Page 83

14 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ MDOT M-43 US-131 to Stadium; Pitcher to West Main JN Cold Milling and HMA resurfacing with ADA sidewalk ramps $2, MDOT I-94 near I-94/US- 131 interchange JN Healer sealer, bridge crack sealing, resealing joints, and deck patching $1, MDOT US-131 BR I-94 BL to north city limit JN Cold Milling and HMA One Course Overlay $1, Local Agencies Burdick Street Drake Road locations Alcott St to South St Grand Prairie to Croyden $8,382 upgrades. upgrades. $504 $496 RCKC Drake Road at Grand Prairie Signal Upgrade $237 MDOT locations in County JN Wrong-way crash reduction improvements to ramp terminals (only partially in KATS area) $ MDOT M-40 at the intersection of 62nd St, 32nd St and CR 653 JN Construct roundabout Subtotal 2017 Road Projects $22, Ridesharing Mobility Management Bus Shelters Service Service Van Demand Response s Fixed Operating Assistance - Rural Security Maintenance and Upgrades Operating of Ridesharing Mobility Management Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Service Service Van Up to 7 Demand Response s ($64,690 STL funds identified in TIP = $80,862 Total) Fixed route bus replacements Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural Up to 6 Demand Response Van Facility security maintenance and upgrades $1,400 $47 $58 $15 $30 $40 $81 $504 $170 $127 $50 Adopted: Date Page 84

15 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ Facility Renovations ITS Equipment - Fixed Route and Demand Response Urban $17,059 Facility renovations $50 ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Subtotal 2017 Projects $18,431 Total 2017 Road and Projects $41, RCKC KL 0.45 Mile West of Drake to Drake Road RCKC D at Douglas RCKC Almena Drive 820' East of Van Kal to Portage South Westnedge M-43 Romence Road to Mall Drive Widen to 3 lanes/ HMA Overlay $200 $600 Intersection improvement $175 Mill/ HMA Overlay $525 HMA mill and resurface with traffic signal improvements, and ADA sidewalk and transit upgrades (Bus shelters). $1, RCKC 28th Street M-43 to F Pulverize/ HMA Overlay/ construct to all season $ RCKC 38th Street O to MN RCKC North Burdick City Limit to Mosel Pulverize/ HMA Overlay/ construct to all Season Reconstruct/ HMA overlay $700 $ RCKC Sprinkle Road Milham to N Portage West Centre 12th Street to Oakland Drive HMA Overlay/ Culvert $1,250 HMA mill and resurface. Sidewalk upgrades and bike trail improvements. signal modernization and transit upgrades (Bus shelters/turnouts). $2, RCKC 12th Street Q to Texas Drive RCKC Grand Prairie Drake Road to Nichols Road MDOT I-94 BL at Howard Street RCKC Sprinkle Road Centre to Milham MDOT I-94 BL east of Seneca to Michigan Cork Street Portage to Sprinkle Mill/ HMA Overlay $600 Mill/ HMA Overlay/ construct to all Season $350 JN Reconstruct $8,506 to install dual left turn lanes at the intersection Mill/ HMA Overlay $1,000 JN Resurface and repair roadway Road resurfacing, fill in sidewalk gaps $2,128 $1,671 Adopted: Date Page 85

16 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ RCKC Texas Drive N/ E of 8th Street to 12th Street Local Agencies West Michigan & Howard St locations 11th Street to Howard, Valley to Crosstown MDOT I-94 EB Miller Road to 40th Street Mill/ HMA Overlay/ Left Turn Lane $750 $710 upgrades. JN Widen and resurface outside shoulder MDOT M-96 at G JN Install rightturn lane Subtotal 2018 Road Projects $25, Ridesharing Mobility Management Bus Shelters Service Service Van Fixed Operating Assistance - Rural Security Maintenance and Upgrades Facility Renovations Operating of Ridesharing Mobility Management Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Service Service Van Fixed route bus replacements Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural Facility security maintenance and upgrades - Fixed Route and Demand Response Urban $1,175 $1,550 $205 $48 $59 $15 $30 $40 $899 $170 $150 $19,804 Up to 6 Demand $131 Response Van Facility renovations $50 Hybrid Buses Hybrid Bus Batteries $255 ITS Equipment ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Subtotal 2018 Projects $21,849 Total 2018 Road and Projects $47, Portage Road Stockbridge to Portage/Pitcher Connector Road resurfacing, partial reconstruction, (include Portage/Pitcher connector - add 0.23 mile) $200 $1, RCKC Sprinkle Road M-43 to G Mill/ HMA overlay $850 Adopted: Date Page 86

17 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ Portage West Milham South Westnedge to Oakland Drive HMA mill and resurface on West Milham from South Westnedge to Oakland Drive, including ADA sidewalk improvements and traffic signalization upgrades.. $2, RCKC H 26th Street to 26th Street RCKC U 29th Street to 32nd Street RCKC 12th Street Ravine Road to D RCKC Nazareth Road South of E. Main to M-43 RCKC Portage Road XY to W RCKC Ravine Road Drake Road to 12th Street RCKC Ravine Road F to D RCKC Riverview Drive G to Mt. Olivet Portage Meredith Street Kilgore Road to Sprinkle Road Van Buren County Road Commission Red Arrow Highway 28 Street to 30th Street Portage Romence Road Oakland Drive to Constitution Blvd Village of Mattawan Murray McGillen to Murray MDOT US-131 over Amtrak and KL Local Agencies locations Mill/ HMA Overlay/ Drainage $75 Pulverize/ HMA Overlay $975 Pulverize / HMA overlay $750 Mill/ HMA Overlay/ Drainage $450 HMA Overlay $600 Reconstruct- Mill/ HMA overlay $650 Reconstruct- Mill/ HMA $1,400 overlay HMA Overlay/ Drainage $410 Project will consist of concrete white topping on Meredith Street from Kilgore Road to Sprinkle Road. Sidewalk upgrades to include widening and extensions to Kilgore Road on the west side of Meredith Street. Trench and widen to achieve a 3-lane section. mill 2" of existing HMA, install fabric, repave to achieve new section. Install C & G at intersections and upgrade access control at commercial drives. Tree removal/trimming and minor drainage corrections. Mill and resurface Romence Road from Oakland Drive to Constitution Boulevard. Bike path and sidewalk with ADA compliance improvements is included in this project Grind existing road repave Deck replacement $230 $925 $522 $750 $10,181 $190 Adopted: Date Page 87

18 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ RCKC G at Riverview Signal $225 Drive Subtotal 2019 Road Projects $23, Mobility Management Ridesharing Bus Shelters Service Service Van Fixed ITS Equipment Operating Assistance - Rural Security Maintenance and Upgrades Facility Renovations Mobility Management Operating of Ridesharing Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Service Service Van Fixed route bus replacements ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural Facility security maintenance and upgrades Up to 6 Demand Response Van - Fixed Route and Demand Response Urban $61 $50 $15 $30 $40 $1,000 $100 $170 $50 $135 $19,976 Facility renovations $50 Subtotal 2019 Projects $21,677 Total 2019 Road and Projects $45, Capacity MDOT I-94 east of Lovers Lane to east of Portage Road JN Roadway reconstruction and widening and interchange reconstruction $33, Capacity MDOT I-94 east of Portage Road to west of Sprinkle Portage South Westnedge Shaver Road to Romence Road JN Road reconstruction and widening and reconstruction and widening of 2 railroad bridges and a large culvert This segment of South Westnedge is the commercial corridor in the Portage. Roadway resurfacing along with traffic signal, sidewalk infrastructure, and pedestrian crossing improvements. $34,660 $1,425 Adopted: Date Page 88

19 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ Howard Street Stadium to Oakland Road resurfacing with installation of a 10 foot sidewalk $ Portage Shaver Road Centre to South Westnedge Portage Centre Portage Road to Sprinkle Road HMA mill and resurface on Shaver Road from West Centre to South Westnedge. Roadway improvements along with traffic signal improvements will enhance vehicular/ pedestrian safety at the intersections. HMA mill and resurface on Centre from Portage Road to Sprinkle Road. $468 $1, Oakland Drive Parkview to Howard Road resurfacing, fill in sidewalk gaps, traffic signal conduit $ Van Buren County Road Commission CR 652 Red Arrow Highway to French Road Trench and widen to complete 5 foot paved shoulders. Mill 2" of existing HMA and replace. Minor drainage corrections. C & G rehabilitation. All included work required to achieve the final section. $ Village of Mattawan Main Street On Main Street from Creek Crossing to 100 feet north of Sidewalk, storm sewer, add bike lanes, upgrade traffic light and village owned street lights, grind and repave road. $2, Village of Mattawan Local Agencies Main Street S Drake Road On Main Street from Creek Crossing to 100 feet north of locations Parkview to KL Ave Replace Culvert, storm sewer, grind and repave road. $1,360 $13,720 upgrades. Subtotal 2020 Road Projects $90, Mobility Management Ridesharing Bus Shelters Security Maintenance and Upgrades Service Mobility Management Operating of Ridesharing Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Facility security maintenance and upgrades Service $1,089 $63 $51 $15 $50 $30 Adopted: Date Page 89

20 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ Fixed ITS Equipment Operating Assistance - Rural Facility Renovations Service Van Fixed route bus replacements ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural $1,000 $100 $170 Up to 6 Demand $139 Response Van Facility renovations $50 Service Van - Fixed Route and Demand Response Urban $40 $20,753 Subtotal 2020 Projects $22,461 Total 2020 Road and Projects $113, Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Howard Street Gar Lane to W. Michigan Howard Street Gull Road Whites Road Cross Town to Oakland Ampersee to North Parkview to Westnedge MDOT I-94 over Paw Paw River Portage Lovers Lane East Centre to Romence Road Portage Milham South Westnedge to Portage Road Installation of a nonmotorized pathway/sidewalk from Gar Ln to W. Michigan Ave to be completed in conjunction with MDOT's construction of Stadium Drive. Road diet to convert 4 lanes to 3 lanes with the addition if a center median island to provide safe passage across Howard for Magnet School Road diet to convert 4 lanes to 3 lanes and add bike lanes Road diet to convert 4 lanes to 3 lanes and add bike lanes JN Articulating Concrete Block, Riprap, Slope Repair (one additional location, half of total project cost, located in rural area) Mill and resurface Lovers Lane from East Centre to Romence Road. Pedestrian crossing improvements at Garden Lane to access multi-mode trail on the east side of Lovers Lane Mill and resurface of East Milham from South Westnedge to Portage Road, including ADA sidewalk improvements. $592 $925 $629 $962 $3,043 $1,407 $2,664 Adopted: Date Page 90

21 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ Portage Oakland Drive Centre to Romence Road Portage South Westnedge Osterhout to South Shore Drive Portage Oakland Drive Romence Road to Milham Van Buren County Road Commission Village of Mattawan Van Buren County Road Commission Van Buren County Road Commission Red Arrow Highway Main Street Red Arrow Highway CR 653 CR 671 to 46 1/2 Street On Main Street I- 94 right of way to the north village limits 39th Street to CR 671 Red Arrow Highway to M 40 Local Agencies locations RCKC 9th Street Beatrice Drive to Seeco Drive Mill and resurface, ADA sidewalk and dedicated bike lane improvements from West Centre to Romence Road. Mill and resurface on South Westnedge from Osterhout to South Shore Drive including ADA sidewalk and bike lane improvements Mill and resurface, ADA sidewalk and dedicated bike lane improvements from Romence Road to Milham. The Northwest Portage Bikeway Trail crossing on this corridor will be enhanced for all users. Trench and widen, mill existing HMA surface 2", install fabric and overlay 2" to achieve 34 foot paved surface with shoulders. Some tree removals and trimming. Minor drainage corrections. Slope modifications and all associated work. Sidewalk, storm sewer, add bike lanes, village owned street lights, grind and repave road. Trench and widen, mill existing HMA surface 2", install fabric and overlay 2" to achieve 34 foot paved surface with shoulders. Some tree removals and trimming. Minor drainage corrections. Slope modifications and all associated work required to achieve the final section. $1,406 $1,243 $1,576 $1,347 $3,109 $1,924 Trench and widen and $1,924 overlay to achieve 28 foot paved surface with shoulders. Some tree removals and trimming. Minor drainage corrections. Slope modifications and all associated work required to achieve the final section. $138,620 upgrades throughout the corridor. $829 Adopted: Date Page 91

22 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ RCKC Sprinkle Road G Ave to Zylman upgrades throughout the corridor. $1, RCKC Stadium Drive 11th Street to 4th Street upgrades throughout the corridor. $ RCKC 35th Street Miller Road to M-96 upgrades throughout the corridor. $ Miller Rd River Street to Portage Rd upgrades. $1, RCKC Miller Road At River Street of Signal. $ RCKC Mosel Douglas to Riverview upgrades throughout the corridor. $1, Oakland Drive Kilgore to Lovell upgrades. $1, Douglas St North St to Patterson St upgrades. $ MDOT I-94 EB at MM 83 and WB at MM 82 JN Construct Emergency/Crash Investigation Sites $1,263 Subtotal Road Projects $171,553 Ridesharing Mobility Management Bus Shelters Fixed Route Expansion Service Service Van Fixed ITS Equipment Operating Assistance - Rural Security Maintenance and Upgrades Operating of Ridesharing Mobility Management Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Expansion of fixed route bus fleet Service Service Van Fixed route bus replacements ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural Facility security maintenance and upgrades Up to 6 Demand Response Van $290 $355 $84 $3,331 $169 $225 $5,633 $563 $958 $282 $781 Adopted: Date Page 92

23 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ Subtotal Total Hybrid Buses Hybrid Bus Batteries $377 Facility Renovations - Fixed $112,354 Route and Demand Response Urban Facility renovations $282 Maintenance/Staff Projects $125,773 Road and Projects $297,326 Capacity Capacity Capacity Village of Mattawan Village of Mattawan Van Buren County Road Commission Van Buren County Road Commission Village of Mattawan Portage Street Paterson Street East McGillen Front Ave CR 375 CR 653 French Ave Pitcher to Michigan Riverview to Porter Main Street to east village limits Main Street to west village limits CR 653 North (Almena) to Van Kal (22nd Street) Red Arrow Highway to CR 653 North (Almena) Main Street to east village limits Road diet to convert 4 lanes to 3 lanes and add bike lanes Road diet to convert 4 lanes to 3 lanes and add bike lanes Add roughly 700 feet of 3rd lane add 200 feet of right turn lane, 4400 feet of bike path, grind existing pavement and repave. Grind existing road add a bike path, minor drainage and repave. Trench and widen, overlay1.75" to achieve 34 foot paved surface with shoulders. Some tree removals and trimming. Minor drainage corrections. Slope modifications and all associated work required. Trench and widen, overlay1.75" to achieve 34 foot paved surface with shoulders. Some tree removals and trimming. Minor drainage corrections. Slope modifications and all associated work required. Grind existing road add a bike path, minor drainage and repave. $89 $468 $540 $4,340 $4,142 $1,261 $1,486 $3, Village of Mattawan French Ave Main Street to west village limits Grind existing road add a bike path, minor drainage and repave. $3, Local Agencies Rose St locations Crosstown to Patterson $125,421 upgrades. $1, Burdick Street At Reed Street Replace Signal $ Patterson St Riverview to Douglas upgrades. $1,027 Adopted: Date Page 93

24 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Subtotal Road Projects $148, Bus Shelters Ridesharing Fixed Route Expansion Mobility Management Service Service Van Fixed ITS Equipment Operating Assistance - Rural Security Maintenance and Upgrades Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Operating of Ridesharing Expansion of fixed route bus fleet Mobility Management Service Service Van Fixed route bus replacements ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural Facility security maintenance and upgrades Up to 6 Demand Response Van - Fixed Route and Demand Response Urban $103 $352 $4,052 $432 $206 $274 $6,853 $685 $1,165 $343 $950 $135, Subtotal Total Facility Renovations Facility renovations $343 Hybrid Buses Hybrid Bus Batteries $459 Projects $151,941 Road and Projects $300,549 Village of Mattawan Robinson Main to east limit Grind existing road, raise the first 800 feet with roughly 10 feet of fill, add retaining wall to south east corner of intersection for sight distance and add 12 ft bike lane repave $5, Subtotal Village of Mattawan Local Agencies Main Kinne to Robinson Grind existing road and $2,629 add 12 ft bike lane repave. $153,814 locations Burdick Street North Street of the traffic signal at Burdick and North Street. $329 Adopted: Date Page 94

25 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/2016 Subtotal Road Projects $161, Mobility Management Ridesharing Bus Shelters Service Van Fixed ITS Equipment Operating Assistance - Rural Security Maintenance and Upgrades Service Mobility Management Operating of Ridesharing Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Service Van Fixed route bus replacements ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural Facility security maintenance and upgrades Up to 6 Demand Response Van Service - Fixed Route and Demand Response Urban $525 $429 $125 $334 $8,338 $834 $1,417 $417 $1,156 $250 $167, Subtotal Total Subtotal Facility Renovations Facility renovations/rehabilitation $417 Hybrid Buses Hybrid Bus Batteries $559 Maintenance/Staff Projects $182,703 Road and Projects $344,515 Local $186,870 Agencies locations Road Projects $186,870 Ridesharing Mobility Management Bus Shelters Service Operating of Ridesharing Mobility Management Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Service $131 $522 $639 $152 $304 Adopted: Date Page 95

26 Area Study Draft politan Plan 4/5/ Service Van Fixed ITS Equipment Operating Assistance - Rural Security Maintenance and Upgrades Service Van Fixed route bus replacements ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural Facility security maintenance and upgrades - Fixed Route and Demand Response Urban $406 $10,145 $1,014 $1,725 $507 $202, Subtotal Total Subtotal Facility Renovations Facility renovations $507 Hybrid Buses Hybrid Bus Batteries $680 Up to 6 Demand Response Van $1,406 $220,047 Road and Projects $406,917 Local $214,241 Agencies locations Road Projects $214,241 Ridesharing Mobility Management Bus Shelters Operating Assistance - Rural Service Service Van Fixed ITS Equipment Security Maintenance and Upgrades Operating of Ridesharing Mobility Management Replace, rehabilitate and/or install up to 6 bus shelters for ADA compliance Operating Expenses - Demand Response Rural Service Service Van Fixed route bus replacements ITS Equipment Hardware, Software, and Licenses Facility security maintenance and upgrades Up to 6 Demand Response Van $635 $777 $185 $2,098 $370 $494 $12,343 $1,234 $617 $1,710 Adopted: Date Page 96