Transportation Research Council. Virginia. Transportation Safety Administration of the Department of Motor Vehicles. The.
|
|
- Charlotte Hudson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Report No. Author(s) B. Charles Report Date 5 pages Organization Name and Address" Performing Transportation Research Council Virginia Edgemont Road 5 Virginia 9-87 Charlottesville, Agencies' Names and Addresses Sponsoring Department of Transportation Virginia E. Broad Street Virginia 9 Richmond, Virginia 9 No.: Project survey observational urban Dept. of Motor Vehicles Va. Safety Administration Transportation Box 7 P.O. VA 69 Richmond, surveys of child safety seat use were conducted at the request of Observational Transportation Safety Administration of the Department of Motor Vehicles. the position in the car for children judged by the survey team to require safety seats under child seat use was higher (5.6%) in the rear seats of cars than in the Correct seats (.8%). For the entire car, only 8.9% of the children were in a correctly front used child seat, ::.6% of the child occupants were not in a data also showed variations in the pattern of among the four areas of the state. use Standard Title Page- Report on State Project Report: Type Report Final No. Pages Period Covered: VTRC 9-R Contract No.: June 99 HB Summer 99 Words Key seat use child Title and Subtitle Direct Observation of the Use of Child Safety Seats in Metropolitan A of Virginia During Summer 99 Areas metropolitan Stoke of Virginia University Charlottesville Notes Supplementary None Abstract survey was conducted in the four areas of the state with the largest popula- present data were categorized as correct use, incorrect use, and no use for each seat tions. state law. safety seat, and 7.5% of the seats were obviously misused. a rate of incorrect use was probably underestimated by this survey. re is need to address the problems of non-use and incorrect use through increased educa- tion and enforcement efforts on the part of the state and localities.
2 B. Stoke Charles Research Scientist Senior 99 June 9-R VTRC FINAL REPORT DIRECT OBSERVATION OF THE USE OF CHILD SAFETY SEATS IN A AREAS OF VIRGINIA DURING SUMMER 99 METROPOLITAN opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this ( are those of the author and not necessarily report those of the sponsoring agencies.) Transportation Research Council Virginia Cooperative Organization Sponsored Jointly by the (A Department of Transportation and Virginia University of Virginia) the Charlottesville, Virginia
3 University Commonwealth L. BUTNER, Traffic Engineering Division Administrator, VDOT J. J. K. COOKE, Assistant Chief of Law Enforcement, Dept. of Game and MAJ. Fisheries Inland S. FELTON, JR., Administrative Coordinator, Commonwealth's Attorneys' W. and Training Council Services D. FERRARA, Ph.D., Director, Division of Forensic Sciences, Dept. of General P. Services R. GEHR, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Transportation D. T. HANNA, Assistant Professor, Transportation Safety Training Center, J. Administration P. J. LANTEIGNE, Operations & Tactics Bureau, Virginia Beach Police SGT. D. McHENRY, Director, Division of Emergency Medical Services, Dept. of S. Health R. P. MINER, Commander, Traffic Division, Fairfax County Police Dept. MAJ. S. E. NEWTON, Commander, Patrol Division, Albemarle County Police LT. Police A. SPENCER, ESQ., Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General J. W. TIMMONS, Director of Public Affairs, Tidewater AAA of Virginia E. R. WOODROOF, ESQ., Manakin-Sabot, Virginia A. SAFETY RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE H. LEIGHTY, Chairman, Deputy Commissioner, Dept. of Motor Vehicles W. D. JERNIGAN, Executive Secretary, Senior Research Scientist, VTRC J. AUSTIN, Transportation Engineering Program Supervisor, Dept. of Rail & D. Transportation Public L. BLAND, Chief Engineer, Dept. of Aviation J. J. BREITENBACH, Director, Transportation Safety Training Center, Virginia R. L. CROZIER, Associate Specialist, Driver Education, Virginia Dept. of V. Education Commonwealth University Virginia A. JENNINGS, Safety/Technology Transfer Coordinator, Federal Highway T. Dept. T. McCOLLUM, Executive Director, Commission on VASAP W. Department T. PHIPPS, Director, Roanoke Valley ASAP J. LT. COL. C. M. ROBINSON, Director, Bureau of Field Operations, Dept. of State
4 Transportation Safety Administration of the Department of Motor requested observational surveys of child safety seat use. present Vehicles was conducted in the four areas of the state with the largest populations. survey data were categorized as correct use, incorrect use, and no use for each child seat use was higher (5.6%) in the rear seats of cars than in Correct front seats (.8%). For the entire car, only 8.9% of the children were in a the rate of incorrect use was probably underestimated by this survey. is a need to address the problems of non-use and incorrect use through re education and enforcement efforts on the part of the state and locali- increased ties. ABSTRACT seat position in the car for children judged by the survey team to require safety seats under state law. used child seat,.6% of the child occupants were not in a safety seat, correctly 7.5% of the seats were obviously misused. data also showed varia- and tions in the pattern of use among the four areas of the state. iii
5 DIRECT OBSERVATION OF THE USE OF CHILD SAFETY SEATS IN A AREAS OF VIRGINIA DURING SUMMER 99 METROPOLITAN B. Stoke Charles Research Scientist Senior on the use of safety belts in Virginia were first collected from 97 Data 977 in the four metropolitan areas of the state: the Roanoke Valley through collection was suspended from 978 to 98 due to a perceived lack of Data by the state's highway safety program for data on belt use. With the pas- need of the Child Safety Seat Law in 98 (effective date January, 98), sage of Motor Vehicles officials requested the collection of data on the Department of child safety seats and safety belts. A safety belt and child safety seat sur- use began in March 98, with additional surveys in June and October 98. vey the years, the number of data collection sites has increased to make Over data representative of statewide use rates. During the first 8 years (97- the and ) 7 sites, strictly in urban areas, were used. In 987, 977 were added in communities with populations below 5,. In 99, addi- sites type of data collected has also changed. From 98 through 985, seat use was recorded as "yes" and "no," with the "no" response including child use. From 986 to the present, child seat use has been recorded as incorrect use, incorrect use, and no use. In 99, data collection on the sex of the correct occupant was discontinued and that for ethnic group was added. these surveys, the reported rate of use was influenced by a number of In including the way the data were collected and the amount and type of factors, , when child seat use From recorded as "yes" and "no," correct use varied from 57. percent to 6.9 was FINAL REPORT INTRODUCTION Richmond/ Henrico/ Chesterfield (Central), Norfolk/Virginia Beach/ (Western), (Eastern), and Fairfax County/Arlington/Alexandria (Northern). Hampton belt and child safety seat use data have been collected at least annually Safety then. since tional sites were added in the urban areas, and in 99 sites were added in cit- ies with populations between 5, and,. By 99, there were a total 5 sites. number of sites in each area was based on the proportion of the of population that lived in the area surveyed. state training given to the observers (Figure ).
6 x,,. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. Incorrect None Area for incorrect use, and the reported rate of correct child seat use checking to. percent. While the observers must undergo training every year, dropped were in-traffic surveys and the observers could not enter the vehi- se to check for installation characteristics. Only non-use and misuses obvious cles outside the vehicle could be determined. This procedure is likely to under- from incorrect use. estimate Transportation Safety Training Center at Virginia Commonwealth as part of its training program in correct child seat installation, car- University, out a number of surveys at shopping centers and day care centers where ried actually entered the car to check the child seats. se surveys were trainees 9O 8O 7 6. ' 5 O O :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Figure. Rates of child safety seat use for the period. In 986, the first year in which incorrect use was recorded separately, percent. use was reported at 68.9 percent. In 987, because the state safety belt correct force suspected that the reported rate of correct use was artificially high, a task training program was conducted for the observers which emphasized special there has been no special emphasis on incorrect use since 987. Over the past years, reported rates for correct child seat use have varied from 57. percent percent, with the peak occurring in 99. In 99, the highest rate of to incorrect use (7.9 percent) was recorded since the special training in 987. not intended to be representative of the general population of the state or of the area in which they were conducted. In addition, the Community Traffic Safety
7 Program in DMV District 5 (Tidewater) has sponsored a number of safety seat in the data, both groups found an extremely high rate of misuse, with the biases common (modal) rate being 88 percent, and with a misuse range from 75 most 9 percent. When it is possible to enter the vehicle to check for correct to most child seats are categorized as misused. se data probably installation, the rate of incorrect use among the general population of the state, overestimate of the manner in which the sites and vehicles were selected. because the passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act With 99 (ISTEA), data collection procedures in Virginia were modified to conform of Federal Guidelines. This change was required by the National Highway Traf- to Safety Administration (NHTSA) before accepting any statewide use rates as fic required that data be collected from moving vehicles, in lanes other than lines curb lane, at both signalized and non-signalized intersections, and that the the Department of Motor Vehicles requested that a survey solely of child seat use be conducted during the summer of 99 to determine the rate safety use of child safety seats by both front and rear seat occupants who were of four years old and riding in passenger cars. project was limited to under collecting data only in the four metropolitan areas of the state. in the Western area. use of shopping centers and day care centers was considered, but when a sample of these locations was checked at various also of day, they either had inadequate traffic volume or evident socioeconomic times bias. checks where the car was entered. se activities also were not designed to be representative of the general Tidewater population. While acknowledging the qualifying the state for ISTEA Section 5 incentive funds. federal guide- use or non-use of the shoulder belt be considered to determine whether the occupant was correctly belted. In making the required changes, the state lost the ability to determine use rates of child safety seats, because in following the federal guidelines a child seat cannot be properly observed. PURPOSE AND SCOPE METHOD child safety seat use data were collected at signalized intersections at sites in the Northern area, in the Eastern area, 7 in the Central area, and
8 only from passenger cars in the curb travel lane (dedicated turn lanes lected not considered as travel lanes), and no distinction was made between Vir- were an orange vest. Each member of the survey team observed up to 5 and cars traffic light cycle, with traffic volume determining the number of cars sur- per data were collected only from cars that had an occupant of the proper seats, Survey team members completed a training program in data collection and age. identify the factors that constituted correct and incorrect use. the age of four" years. Because this was an in-traffic survey, two indices were to help determine whether the child occupant was part of the survey popu- used first was contained in previous versions of the Code, where required lation. seat users were defined as weighing lbs. or less. second child devel- was as an aid to police officers, where a required child seat user was defined oped as inches tall or less. being program for survey team members. training Age, weight, and height factors were included in the seat use was recorded as correct (C), incorrect (I), or non-use (N) Child ). Only those features easily identifiable from outside the vehicle were (Figure to determine whether safety seat use was correct or incorrect. se fea- used included the use or non-use of arm bars/shields, assuring that the seat tures was properly clipped between the legs of the child, that the seat was harness in the proper direction for the age of the child, and that the lap/shoulder facing Non-use was if there was a child of the proper age in the car and no safety seat was recorded or a seat was present, but was not being used, or a lap belt was being present, used in place of a number of recorded correct, incorrect, and non-users at each site is in the Appendix. individual site data are combined into four sepa- shown area totals and the four area totals are combined into a metropolitan total. rate addition, data are shown for the total car, the front seat, and the rear seat. In re were two persons on the survey team. Child seat data were col- licensed and out-of-state vehicles (the law makes ginia distinction between no categories of vehicles). When the passenger cars stopped for the red sig- these the observers left the curb and approached the nal, from the passenger side car fender. As required by state policy, each team member front a hard hat wore veyed. Because this survey was concerned only with the use of child safety how to Section of the Code of Virginia (COV) applies to "a child under was routed through the child seat. For a response to be recorded as corbelt all features had to be used in the correct manner. Misuse or non-use of rect, any one feature required that the use be recorded as incorrect. safety seat. RESULTS
9 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
10 previous reports published by the Virginia Transportation Research In on the results of safety belt use surveys in Virginia, the correct and Council law enforcement officials interpret the provisions of Section 6.-9 because the COV requiring the use of safety belts to be met by ANY belt use regardless of whether the use is proper or safe. For this report on the use of child safety of correct and incorrect uses are NOT combined. Section of the seats, added) secured in a child restraint device." By keeping these data elements sep- data in Figure show the rates of child safety seat use in cars with occupant under four years old. data are categorized by each metropoli- an Eastern Central Northern Area Correct Incorrect incorrect use rates were combined into a total use figure. This was done COV states that a "child under the age of four [must be] PROPERLY (emphasis the severity of the incorrect use problem can be determined, and state arate, can be developed to address this traffic safety problem. programs Total Car Use tan area surveyed and for all four metropolitan areas combined. When the data for all four metropolitan areas were combined, fewer than half (8.9%) of all children under four years old were observed to be correctly using the required child safety seat. Just over one-third (.6%) of the child occupants were not 9O 8O None 7 O Western Combined Figure. Rates of child seat use for the total vehicle.
11 identifiable features were used in making the correct or incorrect use easily these data probably underestimate the rate of incorrect use. decision, the data are considered on the basis of the metropolitan area of the When where the survey occurred, correct use in the Northern, Central, and state areas varied by fewer than six percentage points, with rates ranging Western.9 percent to 7.5 percent. Correct use was much higher in the Eastern from non-use areas in the rate of incorrect use than for rates of correct use and non- between Incorrect use was. percent in the Eastern area,.9 percent in the use. area,.9 percent in the Northern area, and. percent in the West- Central area. ern Eastern Central Northern Area Correct Incorrect Because only using a child safety seat, and incorrect use was 7.5 percent. area (57.5%). rates of non-use were similar in the Northern, Eastern, and Central areas with rates between. percent and 8.6 percent. rate was much lower in the Western area (.%). re was more variability Front Seat Use data in Figure show the rates of correct, incorrect, and non-use of child safety seats by occupants under four years old riding in the front seats of 9O 8O None O O Western Combined Figure. Rates of child seat use for the front seats.
12 passenger cars. the data from each of the four metropolitan areas were combined, When use was.8 percent, incorrect use was 6.8 percent, and non-use was correct percent. re was considerable variability between use rates when the. were examined on a geographical basis. Central area had the highest data rate (7.6%), the Central area had the lowest rate (6.9%), and the difference est rates of use between the Western (7.7%) and the Eastern (6.%) areas was in and the lowest rates were in the Eastern and Central areas (8.% and area Non-use was.8 percent in the Northern area. 7.9%). First, fewer than one- of the children under four years old were riding in the front seats of cars, fourth because there has been considerable publicity advocating the place- possibly seats of cars. show the rates of child safety seat use in the rear the data from each of the four metropolitan areas were combined, When use was 5.6 percent, incorrect use was 7.7 percent, and non-use was correct percent. When the rear seat data were considered on the basis of the met-.7 area of the state surveyed, correct use varied from 6. percent in the ropolitan area to. percent in the Central area. Eastern the Western area and 5. percent in the Northern area. in Incorrect use was percent in the Eastern area, 6.7 percent in the Central area,.6 percent 7.8 the Northern area, and 9. percent in the Western area. Rear seat non-use in varied considerably on a regional basis. non-use rate was as low as 8.7 also in the Western area and as high as 8.9 percent in the Central area. percent in the other two areas more closely followed the pattern of the Central Non-use. percent in the Eastern area and. percent in the Northern area. area; data are categorized for each of the metropolitan areas and for all four areas combined. of correct use (55.%) and the Western area had the lowest rate (.5%). rate use was 6. percent in the Eastern area and 7.6 percent in the North- Correct ern area. When incorrect use was considered, the Northern area had the high- small. non-use data show that the highest rate (58.8%) was in the Western Three factors are readily apparent from the data. ment of children in the rear seats for added safety. Second, over percent of the observed children were not using the required safety seat. Third, for nearly percent of all those observed, the child safety seat was being used in an 7 manner. Again, the seriousness of this third finding is probably incorrect underestimated. Rear Seat Use data in Figure 5 data are tabulated for each metropolitan area and for all four areas combined. Correct use was 5. percent
13 Correct Incorrect Eastern Central Western Combined Northern Area correct child seat use First, for occupants of the rear seats (5.6%) than for those in the front greater (.8%). Second, non-use is lower in the rear seats (.7%) than in the seats seats (.%). Third, incorrect use is marginally higher in the rear seats front determining the significance of the safety seat data collected since In two issues need to be considered. first concerns the population from 986, the survey sample was drawn and how state and federal programs to which safety seat use might affect use rates. second concerns the encourage and procedures for data collection and whether the change in use methods since 99 was an actual drop in rate or was the result of the way the data rates both federal and state agencies have developed and used a number While safety seat public service announcements and have engaged in other activi- of 9O 8O None 7 O Figure 5. Rates of child seat use for the rear seats. Three factors are discernible from these data. is (7.7%) than in the front seats (6.8%). DISCUSSION were collected.
14 encourage safety seat use, these programs have been conducted in a that misses a significant portion of the population. Approximately onefashion of the children subject to the provisions of pass out of the fourth data show a significant drop in correct use over the past three years same areas of the state, using the same sites (several sites were moved, but the locations within the same traffic stream), the same two observers were used, to This sug- a real change in rate. re was, however, a change in the survey proce- gests for 99. In 99 and 99, safety seat use was obtained as part of a dures the Virginia data collected during the summer of 99, the findings From summarized as follows: be safety seat use was higher in the rear seats of cars than in the Child seats. front In 7.5 percent of the observations, the child safety seat was easily as being incorrectly used. identified Correct use was highest in the Eastern area and lowest in the North- use was Incorrect area. ern ties to group each year and are replaced by an entirely new age cohort, signifi- age changing the population base. cantly and an increase in non-use. As with any study of use rates relying on survey the question arises whether there was an actual change in rate or procedures, the survey procedures could account for the change. whether In Virginia, the data on safety seat use for were collected in and the state had few safety seat programs in the first half of 99. safety belt survey. In 99, safety seat use was the sole purpose of the larger survey team had much more time to study the installation of the survey. seat while the car was stopped and to check for incorrect uses. safety in survey procedures may have accounted for some of the reported change change in use rates, although this cannot be quantified. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS can While nearly two-thirds of the children observed were in a safety seat, than one-half were in a correctly used safety seat. fewer More than one-third of these children were not using the required safety seat. child ern area. lowest in the Eastern area and highest in the West-
15 was highest in the Central area and lowest in the Western Non-use area. underestimated, because the survey team was the observers had more time to carefully check proper use in 99 Because to the relatively few children observed at each site), the correct (due rates use re is a need to attack the problems of non-use and incorrect use. of the high rates of non-use and incorrect use of child safety Because it is recommended that: seats, state implement a comprehensive statewide educational program the high rate of non-use, especially in the front seats of emphasizing and the consequences of not having the child protected by a child cars, seat. safety state, in cooperation with local communities, develop local pro- to identify incorrect child seat use and the methods to correct grams Each year thank Harold Reavis and Aaron Zdinak, who spent many hours travel- We around the state, working from early morning to late afternoon, including ing CONCLUSIONS rate of incorrect use is able to identify only the most obvious cases from outside the vehicle. in this document are lower than the statewide use rates reported for reported and RECOMMENDATIONS this situation. Local education and enforcement efforts should be ongoing. there is a new group of infants, and efforts to educate parents must be conducted continually. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS weekends, to collect the data used in this report.
16 APPENDIX
17 Northern Western Eastern Table Child Safety Seat Survey Results Front Seat Rear Seat Total Vehicle Site Location N N C C N C 58 5 Northern Area Total Western Area Total 8 8 Central Central Area Total Eastern Area Total Urban Total
Occ c u c pa p n a t pro r t O ec e t c i t O i n
Occupant Protection Occupant Protection Introduction Buckling up or being buckled in is the most effective protection during a car crash. The simple truth is that the great majority of people ejected from
More informationSafety Administration of the. Transportation of Motor Vehicles. Highway & Transportation Research Council. Virginia. (The
B. Stoke Charles Scientist Research report prepared by Virginia Highway and Transportation A Council under sponsorship of Research Safety Administration of Transportation of Motor Vehicles Division opinions,
More informationAlabama Observational Survey of Occupant and Child Restraint Use 2010
Alabama Observational Survey of Occupant and Child Restraint Use 21 Contact Information: Alabama Department of Public Health Bureau of Health Promotion & Chronic Disease Injury Prevention Branch RSA Tower,
More informationDOT HS September Crash Factors in Intersection-Related Crashes: An On-Scene Perspective
DOT HS 811 366 September 2010 Crash Factors in Intersection-Related Crashes: An On-Scene Perspective DISCLAIMER This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway
More informationHampton Roads Regional Safety Study General Crash Data and Trends Update
Hampton Roads Regional Safety Study General Crash Data and Trends - 2007 Update T07-11 OCTOBER 2007 PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION CHESAPEAKE POQUOSON REBECCA C.W. ADAMS * CHARLES W. BURGESS, JR. AMAR DWARKANATH
More information1998 SURVEY OF FRONT SEAT OCCUPANT RESTRAINT USE IN EIGHTEEN TEXAS CITIES. by Katie N. Womack. October 1998
1998 SURVEY OF FRONT SEAT OCCUPANT RESTRAINT USE IN EIGHTEEN TEXAS CITIES by Katie N. Womack October 1998 This report was prepared in cooperation with the Traffic Operations Division Texas Department of
More informationNEW YORK STATE 2018 Observational Survey of Seat Belt Use
NEW YORK STATE 2018 Observational Survey of Seat Belt New York State Governor s Traffic Safety Committee Chuck DeWeese, Assistant Commissioner Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12228 NEW YORK STATE
More informationMTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS
FACT SHEETS This page left intentionally blank GENERAL FACTS The driver, the roadway, and the motor vehicle contribute in some measure to every crash. A preponderance of evidence, however, points to driver
More informationPartners for Child Passenger Safety Fact and Trend Report October 2006
Partners for Child Passenger Safety Fact and Trend Report October In this report: Background: Child Restraint Laws in PCPS States Page 3 Restraint Use and Seating Page 3 Vehicles Page People and Injuries
More informationFigure 1. Indiana fatal collisions by young driver involvement,
INDIANA TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS YOUNG DRIVERS 2016 MAY 2017 ISSUE 17-C06 IN 2016: In 2016, 13.4 percent of all drivers involved in Indiana collisions were young drivers. Young drivers were involved in 105
More informationMTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS
FACT SHEETS This page left intentionally blank GENERAL FACTS The driver, the roadway, and the motor vehicle contribute in some measure to every crash. A preponderance of evidence, however, points to driver
More informationAnnual Progress Report from VDOT on the Effect of the Aging Population on State Agencies
Annual Progress Report from VDOT on the Effect of the Aging Population on State Agencies HB 110 (2006 GA Session) Report to the Governor and General Assembly of Virginia Virginia Department of Transportation
More informationIowa Child Passenger Safety Survey 2016
Iowa Child Passenger Safety Survey 2016 Conducted by the University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center Under contract to Iowa Governor s Traffic Safety Bureau Background Since 1985, Iowa has had
More information2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children February 2016 Edition
2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION February 2016 Edition Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children www.luhs.org/emsc Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children TABLE OF CONTENTS
More information2012 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children September 2014 Edition
2012 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION September 2014 Edition Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children www.luhs.org/emsc Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSchool Zone Traffic Control Policy
School Zone Traffic Control Policy I. GE ERAL CITY OF BILLINGS SCHOOL ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL POLICY (Approved by Traffic Control Board 10/27/99) (Approved by Billings City Council on 6/25/01) This policy
More informationA. LETTERS OF SUPPORT ON THE WYTHE CREEK ROAD WIDENING PROJECT
ITEM #19: CORRESPONDENCE OF INTEREST A. LETTERS OF SUPPORT ON THE WYTHE CREEK ROAD WIDENING PROJECT Attached are five letters to Mayor Hunt of Poquoson in support of the Wythe Creek Road widening project.
More informationAlberta. Traffic Collision Statistics. Office of Traffic Safety Transportation Services Division May 2017
Traffic Collision Statistics Office of Traffic Safety Transportation Services Division May 217 This page was intentionally left blank. 2 Table of Contents Traffic Collisions... 4 Traffic Collision Rates...
More informationBicyclist Signing Guidelines
Bicyclist Signing Guidelines April, 2009 1 Introduction This paper describes the Montana Department of Transportation s (MDT) current practices related to bicyclist safety and signing issues and presents
More informationCanadian Association of Chiefs of Police Association canadienne des chefs de police
WHAT S IN THE KIT? Media Advisory Template To be used to invite the media to an event during Operation Impact. We suggest you reproduce this on your own police agency letterhead. News Release Template
More informationBackground: Introduction:
Background: Iowa s 2014 Child Passenger Safety Survey Project Conducted by the University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center Under contract to Iowa Governor s Traffic Safety Bureau Since 1985, Iowa
More informationProtecting our Children and Youth. The Life Saving Benefits of Child Safety Seats, Boosters, and Seat Belts
Protecting our Children and Youth The Life Saving Benefits of Child Safety Seats, Boosters, and Seat Belts The Problem Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death among children ages 3 and over.
More informationGeometric Categories as Intersection Safety Evaluation Tools
Geometric Categories as Intersection Safety Evaluation Tools John R. Campbell Ayres Associates N19 W24075 Riverwood Drive, Suite 300 Waukesha, WI 53188 campbellj@ayresassociates.com Keith K. Knapp Engineering
More informationTEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY TASK FORCE. Jeff Moseley Texas Transportation Commission
TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY TASK FORCE Jeff Moseley Texas Transportation Commission June 7, 2016 Fatalities and fatal crashes 2010 2015 4,000 3,500 3,417 3,407 3,536 3,533 3,000 3,061 3,067 2,782 2,803 3,037
More informationSection 9. Implementation
Section 9. Implementation The transportation system is just one of many aspects that must be carefully planned to maintain and enhance the quality of living in Cecil County. The Cecil County Bicycle Plan
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN
PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN ESTABLISHING TARGETS FOR FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES: HIGHWAY SAFETY SOUTHEASTERN
More informationCorpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:
Introduction: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) has continued the efforts started through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
More informationHampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee
Hampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee Virginia Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee April 22, 2015 Carl E. Jackson, AICP Transportation Planning Specialist Hampton Roads District
More informationADDIS ABABA ROAD SAFETY STRATEGY
ADDIS ABABA ROAD SAFETY STRATEGY (2017-2030) Feb 22, 2017 Presentation: Daniel Molla Overview Addis Ababa Capital City of Ethiopia, Seat of AU Area: 540 km 2 Population 3.4 million Road safety crises 400
More informationMALL CROSSING STUDY. Testing the Effectiveness Of the 4th Street East Crossing. For: City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Development Services
MALL CROSSING STUDY One-Year Evaluation Final Report Testing the Effectiveness Of the 4th Street East Crossing For: City of Charlottesville Neighborhood Development Services May 2007 By: CHARLOTTESVILLE
More informationDevelopment of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia
Development of Guidelines for Bicycle Use of Controlled Access Facilities in Virginia VDOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Fall Working Group Meeting October 30, 2013 Young-Jun Kweon,
More informationPOLICY AGENDA For Elder Pedestrian Safety
POLICY AGENDA For Elder Pedestrian Safety Older adults and people with disabilities often have mobility, cognitive, and sensory limitations that affect their behavior as pedestrians and place them at risk
More informationFiscal Year 2017 Bicycle and Pedestrian Metric Report
Fiscal Year 2017 Bicycle and Pedestrian Metric Report November 2017 In 2015, the Virginia Department of Transportation s (VDOT) implementation of the 2004 Commonwealth Transportation Board s (CTB) Policy
More informationBicycle RSAs: How to Conduct Road Safety Audits and How to Use Them to Promote Bicyclist Safety. Dan Nabors, PE, VHB Bill DeSantis, PE, VHB
PBIC Webinar Bicycle RSAs: How to Conduct Road Safety Audits and How to Use Them to Promote Bicyclist Safety [IMAGE] Dan Nabors, PE, VHB Bill DeSantis, PE, VHB Sept. 26, 2013, 2 pm Today s Presentation
More informationBhagwant N. Persaud* Richard A. Retting Craig Lyon* Anne T. McCartt. May *Consultant to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
Review of The Impact of Red Light Cameras (Photo-Red Enforcement) on Crashes in Virginia by Nicholas J. Garber, John S. Miller, R. Elizabeth Abel, Saeed Eslambolchi, and Santhosh K. Korukonda Bhagwant
More informationEvaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports
Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports by Fouad H. Fouad and Elizabeth A. Calvert Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham,
More informationAnalyzing Traffic Engineering Problems in Small Cities D onald S. Berry
Analyzing Traffic Engineering Problems in Small Cities D onald S. Berry Director, Traffic and Transportation Division National Safety Council Chicago, Illinois According to the Public Roads Administration,
More informationCrash Patterns in Western Australia. Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services
Crash Patterns in Western Australia Kidd B., Main Roads Western Australia Willett P., Traffic Research Services Abstract Examination of crash patterns is one way of identifying key factors on which focus
More informationAPPENDIX F. Safety Planning. October 2018
APPENDIX F Safety Planning October 2018 APPENDIX F: SAFETY PLANNING October 17, 2018 ABOUT VISUALIZE 2045 & THE TPB Visualize 2045 is the federally required long-range transportation plan for the National
More informationBikeway Plan for the Roanoke Valley Area MPO Update ACKWOWLEDGEMENTS
ACKWOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared by the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission (RVARC), which is the lead staff agency for the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
More informationWatson Chapel School District. School Bus Safety Plan
Watson Chapel School District School Bus Safety Plan Table of Contents I. Plan Authorization A. Statutory Authority B. Applicable Participants C. Initial Plan and Updates II. School District Responsibilities
More informationTraffic Safety Plan Traffic Safety Plan 2015
Traffic Safety Plan 2015 Purpose Airdrie s last Traffic Safety Plan was created in 2011. The 2015 Traffic Safety Plan is a revised model of the traffic operations for the City of Airdrie. The purpose of
More informationSCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA
CITY OF MADISON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA January 2016 Adopted as Policy on August 31, 1976, by Common Council by Amended Resolution #29,540 Amended on September 14, 1976,
More informationCHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON APRIL 25, 2016
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON APRIL 25, 2016 JOHN BRAAM, P. ENG. MANAGING DIRECTOR, ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CITY ENGINEER SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMIT
More informationOccupant Protection Laws
Occupant rotection Laws tate Must Be in Child Restraint* Additional eat Belt Coverage* Who is Covered & Where rimary or econdary Alabama Under 6 yrs.** 6 until 15 yrs. 15+ yrs. in Alaska Under 4 yrs.**
More informationWashington Bicycle Traffic Laws
Washington Bicycle Traffic Laws RCW 46.04.071 Definition of Bicycle Bicycle means every device propelled solely by human power upon which a person or persons may ride, having two tandem wheels either of
More informationCOLLISION STATISTICS May Engineering Services Box 5008, th Avenue Red Deer, AB T4N 3T4
COLLISION STATISTICS 2016 2016 Red Deer Annual Motor Vehicle Collision Report May 2017 Engineering Services Box 5008, 4914 48th Avenue Red Deer, AB T4N 3T4 engineering@reddeer.ca RCMP GRC Red Deer City
More informationOccupant Protection Laws
Occupant Protection s Alabama Alaska Arizona Under 1 yr. or
More information1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey
SACOG-00-009 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Sacramento Area Council of Governments 1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey June 2000 Table of Contents
More informationThe Route 29 Corridor Study was initiated at the request of Virginia s Commonwealth
CHAPTER 2: Study Background and approach The Route 29 Corridor Study was initiated at the request of Virginia s Commonwealth Transportation Board in response to requests from members of the General Assembly
More informationFunding Sources Appendix I. Appendix I. Funding Sources. Virginia Beach Bikeways and Trails Plan 2011 Page I-1
Funding Sources Virginia Beach Bikeways and Trails Plan 2011 Page I-1 Funding Sources Federal and state agencies provide funding for local bikeway and trail projects. Descriptions follow for programs that
More informationBIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 TRAFFIC RECORDS GRANT. SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants.
SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants. Name of Tribe: Click here to enter text. Address : Click here to enter text. City: Click here to enter text. State: Click
More informationHighway 17 Transportation Improvement Study
Final Report Highway 17 Transportation Improvement Study prepared for Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission (SCCRTC) prepared by Planning and Engineering, Inc. 1155 North First Street, Suite
More informationToward Zero Deaths. Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting. Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan. presented by
Toward Zero Deaths Regional SHSP Road Show Meeting presented by Virginia Strategic Highway Safety Plan December 1, 2016 1 Welcome & Introductions Purpose of the Meeting Objectives & Key Outcomes Agenda»
More informationBIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 LAW ENFORCEMENT OVERTIME GRANT
SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants. Name of Tribe: Click here to enter text. Address : Click here to enter text. City: Click here to enter text. State: Click
More informationOccupant Protection Laws
Alabama Alaska Arizona ; under 5 yrs. and 20 lbs. forward-facing ; 4-8 yrs.,
More informationMission: The mission of FARS is to make vehicle crash information accessible and useful so that traffic safety can be improved
Mission: The mission of FARS is to make vehicle crash information accessible and useful so that traffic safety can be improved NHTSA created FARS in 1975 National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA)
More informationBike to the Future c/o Portage Avenue. Winnipeg, MB. R3B 2B2 Fax:
January 9, 2006 Bike to the Future c/o 3 330 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, MB R3B 2B2 Fax: 989-8476 biketothefuture@gmail.com www.biketothefuture.org Honourable Kerri Irvin-Ross Minister of Intergovernmental
More informationTravel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus
Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus 040829040.15 Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus: 2012-2015 Overview The Miami Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) conducted a series
More informationNovember 2, Government takes on the challenge of improving traffic safety
November 2, 2006 Government takes on the challenge of improving traffic safety Edmonton... The Alberta government has taken on the challenge of improving traffic safety by moving ahead with a comprehensive,
More informationCity of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session
City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session Agenda Item # 4c City Council Meeting 6/2/2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Robert Sisson, City Manager Discussion
More informationVMTP 2025 Needs Assessment
VMTP 2025 Needs Assessment Safety The VTrans2040 Vision document highlights safety as one of the Commonwealth s key transportation goals and sets objectives for reducing motorized and non-motorized fatalities
More informationPedestrian Accidents in Kentucky
Transportation Kentucky Transportation Center Research Report University of Kentucky Year 1976 Pedestrian Accidents in Kentucky Charles V. Zegeer Robert C. Deen Kentucky Department of Transportation Kentucky
More informationTRANSIT PERFORMANCE IN THE I-66 INSIDE THE BELTWAY CORRIDOR
TRANSIT PERFORMANCE IN THE I-66 INSIDE THE BELTWAY CORRIDOR June 2018 This report summarizes the performance of public transportation systems serving the I-66 inside the Beltway corridor in Northern Virginia.
More informationBIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT. SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants.
SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants. Name of Tribe: Click here to enter text. Address : Click here to enter text. City: Click here to enter text. State: Click
More informationSketch Level Assessment. of Traffic Issues. for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal. Ronald F. Kirby
Sketch Level Assessment of Traffic Issues for the Fluor Daniel I-495 HOT Lane Proposal Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) Metropolitan
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis Prepared for: Arlington County Department of Environmental Services 2100 Clarendon Boulevard,
More informationNEW JERSEY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIAISON NEWSLETTER
NEW JERSEY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIAISON NEWSLETTER SEPTEMBER 2017/12 WWW.NJSACOP.ORG DRIVE SOBER OR GET PULLED OVER NJ DIVISION OF HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY The mission of the Division of Highway Traffic Safety
More informationEvaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation
Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation City of Hillsdale, Hillsdale County, Michigan June 16, 2016 Final Report Prepared for City of Hillsdale 97 North Broad
More informationARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY
ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
More information2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile
TRANS Committee 2011 Origin-Destination Survey National Capital Region December 2012 TRANS Committee Members: City of Ottawa, including OC Transpo Ville de Gatineau Société de transport de l Outaouais
More informationSenate Amendment to Senate Bill No. 354 (BDR ) Amends: Summary: Yes Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest: Yes
0 Session (th) A SB Amendment No. Senate Amendment to Senate Bill No. (BDR -) Proposed by: Senate Committee on Transportation Amends: Summary: Yes Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest:
More informationMAINE STATE LEGISLATURE
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced
More informationHampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee
Hampton Roads Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee HRTPO Transportation Technical Advisory Committee November 6, 2013 Carl E. Jackson III, AICP Transportation Planning Specialist Hampton Roads District
More informationWhite-tailed Deer Age Report from the Deer Harvest
White-tailed Deer Age Report from the 2016 Deer Harvest The Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department has made a concerted effort, beginning in 2015, to increase the amount of age data collected from harvested
More informationArlington County Police Department Law Enforcement Guide. Enforcing Bicycle Traffic Laws
Arlington County Police Department Law Enforcement Guide Enforcing Bicycle Traffic Laws Arlington County Police Department Safe Bicycling Initiative 2017 About the Arlington Safe Bicycling Initiative The
More informationCDRT. Child Death Review Team Dallas County. Brief Report Traffic-related Child Deaths OVERVIEW
Dallas County CDRT Child Death Review Team 2013 Brief Report Traffic-related Child Deaths 2006-2011 OVERVIEW In Dallas County, traffic-related injury death rates among children are typically less than
More informationSCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA
CITY OF MADISON TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA AUGUST 1990 Adopted as Policy on August 31, 1976, by Common Council by Amended Resolution #29,540 Amended on September 14, 1976,
More informationCHAPTER 71: TRAFFIC RULES. Operation Generally. Accidents. Prohibitions
CHAPTER 71: TRAFFIC RULES Section 71.01 Obstructing traffic 71.02 Reverse or U turns 71.03 Backing vehicles 71.04 Vehicles crossing sidewalks 71.05 Speed limits 71.15 Duty of operator 71.16 Accident report
More informationInstitute of Transportation Engineers Safety Action Plan
I Institute of Transportation Engineers Safety Action Plan 1. Introduction 2. Intersection Crashes 3. Keep Vehicles on the Road 4. Minimize Consequences When Vehicles Leave the Road 5. School Crossing
More informationTOOLKIT STOP ON RED. National. Week August 6-12, 2017 RED-LIGHT RUNNING FACT. #StopOnRed2017 to spread the message!
National STOP ON RED Week August 6-12, 2017 RED-LIGHT RUNNING FACT In 2015, 771 people were killed due to red-light running and an estimated 137,000 were injured. Source: IIHS TOOLKIT Learn more about
More informationroad safety issues 2001 road toll for Gisborne district July 2002 Road user casualties Estimated social cost of crashes*
GISBORNE DISTRICT road safety issues July 22 The Land Transport Safety Authority (LTSA) has prepared this Road Safety Issues Report. It is based on reported crash data and trends for the 1997 21 period.
More informationComparison of the Green Arrow and the Circular Green for Turn Prohibition to Reduce Wrong-Way Movements at Interchange Terminals
Comparison of the Green Arrow and the Circular Green for Turn Prohibition to Reduce Wrong-Way Movements at Interchange Terminals Jin Wang Department of Civil Engineering Auburn University March 27, 2017
More informationWoodward Hill Elementary School School Safety and Operation Review
Address: 6082-142 nd Street Surrey, BC, V3X 1C1 Site Visit: March 7, 2011 Principal Anne Mackie Report Date: November 25, 2011 Phone: (604) 594-2408 Email: Mackie_A@sd36.bc.ca The following report is one
More informationFor Information Only. Pedestrian Collisions (2011 to 2015) Resolution. Presented: Monday, Apr 18, Report Date Tuesday, Apr 05, 2016
Presented To: Operations Committee For Information Only Pedestrian Collisions (0 to 0) Presented: Monday, Apr 8, 06 Report Date Tuesday, Apr 0, 06 Type: Correspondence for Information Only Resolution For
More informationRoad safety status in the WHO South-East Asia Region, 2013
Road safety status in the WHO South-East Asia Region, 2013 2013 (1) (2) (3) Key facts at a glance Road traffic crashes accounted for 334 815 deaths in the South-East Asia Region during 2010, with the rate
More informationMnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014
MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy January 2014 1 Prepared by Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 Phone: 651-296-3000 Toll-Free:
More informationModal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009
Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009 May 2010 Prepared for the City of Boulder by National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30th Street Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 444-7863 www.n-r-c.com Table of Contents
More informationroad safety issues 2002 road trauma for Tauranga District July 2003 Regional crash causes Estimated social cost of crashes*
road safety issues July 23 22 road trauma for Tauranga District The Land Transport Safety Authority (LTSA) has prepared this road safety issues report. It is based on reported crash data and trends for
More informationNorth Carolina. Bicycle Crash Facts Prepared for
North Carolina Bicycle Crash Facts 2006-2010 Prepared for The North Carolina Department of Transportation Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Prepared by The University of North Carolina
More informationDoes It Work? THE BENCHMARKING PROJECT. State Department of Transportation Project Assessment. Bill Wilkinson and Bob Chauncey
THE BENCHMARKING PROJECT Does It Work? State Department of Transportation Project Assessment Bill Wilkinson and Bob Chauncey National Center for Bicycling & Walking 1506 21 st Street NW, Washington, DC
More informationBES Line guard Handbook INTRODUCTION
BES Line guard Handbook INTRODUCTION This manual is provided to offer direction in the City of Bloomer for training adult crossing guards in their best responsibilities at crosswalk where students generally
More informationMTP BICYCLE ELEMENT UPDATE. November 2017
MTP BICYCLE ELEMENT UPDATE November 2017 TIME FOR AN UPDATE Bicycle Element adopted in July 2008 Almost 10 years old Many planned facilities have been implemented 10 years more experience in planning,
More informationINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. Who determines the two (2) mile limit? Florida Statutes: 1006.21, Chapter 6A-3.001 (3), School Board Policy 503: A reasonable
More informationNMSU Red Light Camera Study Update
NMSU Red Light Camera Study Update Assessment of Impact of City of Las Cruces Safe Traffic Operations Program on Intersection Traffic Safety Before-and-After Analysis of Crash Data Preliminary Report
More informationPEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1994 through 2000
PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1994 through 2000 City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Gloria Jeff, General Manager March, 2006 This document printed with grant funds from the California
More informationDRAFT MOVING FORWARD RHODE ISLAND BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH
RHODE ISLAND MOVING FORWARD BICYCLE MOBILITY PLAN 2018 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY IN ASSOCIATION WITH T AF CHAPTER 1 D R INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 3 ARTICULATES VISION Bicycling is safe, fun and practical in
More informationStreet Smart - Regional Pedestrian Safety Campaign. Hopkins Grand Rounds July 16, 2014
Street Smart - Regional Pedestrian Safety Campaign Hopkins Grand Rounds July 16, 2014 Baltimore Metropolitan Council (BMC) Who We Are The organization of the Baltimore region s elected executives, representing
More informationCARJACKING. in New Jersey
CARJACKING in New Jersey 2 01 6 TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL CARJACKING OFFENSE REPORT 2016 Honorable Gurbir S. Grewal Attorney General State of New Jersey Patrick J. Callahan Colonel New Jersey State Police Major
More information