The operational phase will result in noise from operational vessel movements.
|
|
- Lee Miller
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 13B Port Study Area Underwater Noise Scoping Report 13B.1 Introduction Direct impacts to fish and marine mammals may occur as a result of construction noise and vibration. Noise and vibration will occur during dredging of the approach channel, turning circle and quay location as well as during the piling required for construction quay and associated structures. Dredging and piling generates a certain amount of underwater noise and vibration, which can impact fish distributions and marine mammal behaviour. A description of noise levels in air can be found in Chapter 8: Noise and Vibration. Underwater noise is considered below. The operational phase will result in noise from operational vessel movements. Noise assessment involves a number of technical terms. These are described in the box below. Underwater Noise Measurements Since there is a range of ways in which underwater noise can be quantified, a variety of noise metrics are often referred to in literature. Underwater noise levels are commonly referred to in terms of decibels (db). The decibels are based on a ratio of the underwater sound pressure to a common reference of 1 micropascal (db re μpa). The acoustic pressure referred to above can be expressed as either the peak to peak (p-p), peak (peak) or root mean square (rms). The type of pressure measurement used is an important consideration when comparing noise levels and criteria and the type of pressure measurement should be stated when quoting noise levels. The peak pressure is the maximum absolute pressure for an instantaneous signal. However, acoustic pressure varies from positive to negative to form the pressure fluctuations that can be heard by fauna. Therefore, it is also possible to refer to the peak to peak value (p-p), which is the algebraic difference between the highest (positive) point to the lowest (negative) point of a sound pressure signal. The peak to peak value is higher for a given signal than the peak value. These measures do not reflect average values of sound and an additional quantity is used to reflect this, which is referred to as the root mean squared (or rms) value. This quantity is the square root of the mean of the instantaneous pressures squared. With a continuous signal a measurement of the root mean square (rms) sound pressure is an appropriate metric. With a sound impulse (ie in impact piling), however, a metric must be chosen which adequately describes the potential for damage to fauna of pulses of different lengths and energy distribution; that is, which measures the acoustic energy in the transient event. The sound exposure level (SEL) is one such metric. The SEL is defined as that level which, normalised to 1 second, has the same acoustic energy as the transient event and is expressed as db re 1μPa 2 s. For a discussion of piling impacts, a cumulative SEL value is derived that considers the SEL of a single-strike value and the number of strikes required to place a pile at its final depth. 13B.2 Baseline 13B.2.1 Fish There are several species of fish which likely to pass through the survey area. Priority species identified during surveys in 2008 include the Blackchin guitarfish (Rhinobatos cemiculus) and Daisy stingray (Dasyatis margarita). These are both members of the group including all rays and skates, and are listed as Endangered by the IUCN. The Bonga shad (Ethmalosa finmbriata) is both abundant and widespread. Fish diversity and abundance in the study area is concentrated in coastal waters less than 20 m deep, especially around the mouths of estuaries. The fish population is dominated by demersal species, preferring to live close to the seabed. 13B-1
2 Sound Detection in Fish Fish have differing sensitivities to noise depending on various anatomical and physiological structures. Two sound detection mechanisms are present in those marine fish species that have the ability to hear: the inner ear system of otolithic bones, and a lateral line system comprising a series of sensory cells that run from the gills to the tail fin. These cells allow the fish to detect relative motion and sound in the aquatic environment. Many species also use the gas-filled swim bladder in the abdominal cavity for detecting sound. Underwater noise causes the swim bladder gas to vibrate and links between the swim bladder and the ear allow the sound wave energy to be re-directed to the ear. The use of the swim bladder allows fish to detect sounds with hearing sensitivity increased in species where the ear and swim bladder are more closely connected. Sharks and rays do not have swim bladders. Hearing specialists such as herring-like species, including sardinella (Sardinella sp), bonga shad (Ethmalosa fimbriata) and West African ilisha (Ilisha africana), are characterised by high auditory sensitivity and bandwidth. The majority of fish species possess a swimbladder but no special connections to the inner ear. Their sensitivity is moderate and the bandwidth of frequencies that they are able to hear tends to be narrow. These are commonly referred to as hearing generalists and are likely to include most species found in the study area. Sciaenid fishes, which make up the majority of the fish population in the area in terms of biomass, are considered to be hearing generalists (1). 13B.2.2 Marine Mammals Different cetaceans (including the Atlantic humpbacked dolphin) are likely present in the study area. The West African manatee may also occasionally enter the area but is likely a rare visitor. Most cetacean species will be located in offshore waters, and are unlikely to be found near to the port site. Atlantic Humpbacked Dolphin inhabit coastal and estuarine waters, and have been known to swim up into rivers. West African manatee may be found in mangrove channels, or occasionally in coastal and estuarine waters when moving between areas. 13B.2.3 Turtles There are five species of marine turtle that are likely to be within the survey area. These include Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) and Hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata). These species predominantly inhabit offshore, coastal and estuarine waters, where they feed. There is the possibility that some species use sandy beaches in the area for nesting, but this is likely to involve only occasional individuals. 13B.2.4 Measured Baseline A survey of baseline underwater noise levels was carried out in the offshore area off the coast of Guinea, south of Conakry in the autumn of 2011 (2). The goals of the acoustic monitoring program were to document baseline ambient noise conditions, and identify sources of underwater noise off the south coast of Guinea. The acquired acoustic data were analysed to quantify ambient sound levels and the presence of anthropogenic activity (shipping noise) in the area. Ambient sound off Île Kaback was recorded from 24 September 2011 to 3 November The sound levels were unusually quiet. The mean level for the band of Hz was 95.2 db with a standard deviation of 10.8 db. A very small amount of boating and shipping activity was present. (1) Cruz, A. & Lombarte A. (2004). Otolith size and its relationship with colour patterns and sound production. Journal of Fish Biology 65: (2) Simandou Project Port Component Baseline Environmental Report for Underwater Noise Conditions off Kaback Island Area (Ginea) Preliminary Version, JASCO Applied Sciences. Environnement Illimité inc., March B-2
3 The dominant sound sources were wind, waves, and biological sources, especially daily fish choruses and snapping shrimp. This location as being unusually quiet in comparison with typical subsea ambient noise levels in other parts of the world. The levels at 50 and 100 Hz are 2-7 db below the minimum usual traffic levels for shallow water shipping noise. At frequencies above 500 Hz, localized anthropogenic activity, wind, waves, rain, and biological activity become the dominant sound sources. For the period of late September-early November 2011, the area off Île Kaback the acoustic data indicates very low average sea states, and that fish and snapping shrimp are the dominant noise sources. There is some acoustic detection that may be from cetaceans, however, they are intermittent. The recording period occurred during the wet season, but there is little evidence of strong precipitation in the acoustic data. Heavy rain typically appears as a band of energy from Hz, depending on the drop size. Closer to shore and in the Morebaya River estuary, ambient noise levels are likely affected by breaking waves. 13B.3 Methodology for Predicting Potential Impacts from Underwater Noise 13B.3.1 Sound Propagation This assessment has been carried out considering the potential noise source, the propagation path of the sound underwater and suitable criteria for the receptors. At this stage using approximate sound propagation spreading characteristics has been assumed. This does not include the effects of the sound speed profile and bathymetry in the area. For long range propagation calculations an assumption of 15xlog(R/R0) provides a good estimate of spreading where R is the distance from the source at which predictions are required and R0 is the distance at which the source measurement was made. This is the empirical prediction approach currently endorsed by a multiagency Fisheries Hydroacoustic Working Group for the California Department of Transportation (2009) (1) and its use has currently been re-endorsed by the NMFS Northwest Region as a practical way of assessing the potential effect of piling projects (2). 13B.3.2 Noise Source For the purposes of this assessment the main source of noise has been assumed to be the noise from driven piling during construction and predicted noise levels have been carried out for this noise source. The piles that are to be used in this project are expected to have a diameter of 1.2 m. However, options are being considered for large piles with diameters of 1.5 m and 1.6 m. Noise data for various ranges of pile diameters are included in the FHWG guidance document and data is presented for a 66 diameter (1.7 m) pile from piling at the Richmond-San Rafael bridge. The data are presented in Table 13B.1 below. The data are based on measurements of 1.7 m diameter CIDH Trestle piles that were driven using a diesel impact hammer. Reported driving energies were about 270 kilojoules. Note that the SEL value was found to be 11 to 12 db lower than the rms value, and is quoted conservatively as 10 db below the rms in this assessment. Table 13B.1 Single Strike Noise from Pile Driving (Measured at 10 m) Pile Peak Pressure Level db re 1 μpa RMS Sound Pressure Level db re 1 μpa Sound Exposure Level (db re 1μPa 2 s) CIDH (66 inch) impact (at 10 m) Source: California Department of Transportation (2009) (1) ICF Jones and Stokes, (2009). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile Driving on Fish, ICF Jones and Stokes for the California Department of Transportation, February 2009, 298 pp. (2) Memorandum from NMFS Northwest Region and Northwest Fisheries Science Center: Guidance Document: Sound Propagation Modeling to Characterize Pile Driving Sounds Relevant to Marine Mammals, January 31, B-3
4 Piling source levels vary depending on the diameter of the pile and the method of pile driving (impact or vibropiling). The piling methodology has not been developed at this stage and the highest noise levels (from driven piling) are used in this assessment. The frequency spectrum for piling ranges from less than 20 Hz to more than 20 khz with most energy around Hz (1). In order to calculate the accumulated SEL exposure level the number of pile strikes per day must be estimated. The number of strikes per pile is not available at this stage, and an example value from the FHWG document of strikes per pile has been used. The maximum piling rate is one pile per rig per day for piles that are simply driven into place, and less from those that required toe drilling. The maximum number of rigs that could practically operate together is four, giving a maximum number of piles driven of four in a day. This would result in a total of pile strikes in a 24 hour period. The noise from vessels in the area has also been considered. Dredging vessels are likely to be the most significant of these and their noise emissions are typically equivalent to a noisy merchant vessel underway. They also affect an area for longer than a passing vessel, and therefore the potential effect has been assumed to be larger. Dredging emits continuous broadband sound during operations, mostly in the lower frequencies. Source levels range from 160 to 180 db re 1 μpa at 1 m (maximum ~ 100 Hz) (2). Most energy has been found to be below 500 Hz. Dredging has also been measured for a variety of vessels in the UK (3) (4) which confirmed the conclusions that dredging was within the range of general shipping noise but suggested that total noise levels could be up to 190 db re 1 μpa at 1 m rms. This higher source term has been used to assess potential dredging and vessel noise. 13B.4 Predicted Impact Zones 13B B Fish Criteria The potentially lethal effects on fish have been considered rather than the effects of sub-lethal hearing damage in this assessment. Work has been done by the Fisheries Hydroacoustic Working Group (5) (FHWG) to try to address this knowledge gap. Interim criteria of 206 db re 1 μpa (peak) have been set with accumulated sound exposure level (SEL) of 187 db and 183 db re 1 μpa 2 -sec. The SEL criteria are intended to take into account the likely noise exposure over time, which would require more detailed knowledge of likely timings of activities than is available at this stage of the project. However, these parameters have been estimated based on current knowledge to enable an estimate to be made, assuming a worst case based on the assumption that fish might not move when the piling starts. The SEL is measured over the duration of the seismic pulse, and then an accumulated value is calculated over all of the noise events in one day. The 183 db exposure criterion above is intended to apply to fish weighing less than 2 g. There are insufficient peer reviewed reliable data available for the onset of behavioural disturbance in fish as noted by the Fisheries Hydro Acoustic Working Group (FHWG). However, it is noted that as a conservative measure, NOAA Fisheries and USFWS generally have used 150 db rms as the threshold for behavioural effects to fish species of particular concern (salmon and bull trout) for most biological opinions evaluating pile driving, citing that sound pressure levels in excess of 150 db rms can cause temporary behavioural changes (startle and stress) that could decrease a fish s ability to avoid predators. Relatively little justification is given to support this statement, but in the absence of other criteria this value was used to indicate where behavioural effects might be likely. It should be noted that those agencies that support this approach have indicated that mitigation would not be expected in the situation that this level was exceeded. (1) Götz et al, (2009). Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment. OSPAR Commission. (2) Götz et al, (2009). Overview of the impacts of anthropogenic underwater sound in the marine environment. OSPAR Commission. (3) Robinson, et al (2011) (4) Measurement of Underwater Noise Arising from Marine Aggregate Dredging Operations, MALSF, Feb (5) ICF Jones and Stokes, (2009). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile Driving on Fish. ICF Jones and Stokes for the California Department of Transportation, February 2009, 298 pp. 13B-4
5 Compared to pelagic elasmobranchs (sharks and rays), the little skate (Raja erinacea) and another bottom dwelling shark (the horn shark, Heterodontus francisi) have less sensitive hearing (1). It is suggested that this less sensitive hearing is linked to feeding on benthic prey. However, in order to conduct a conservative assessment the same criterion has been applied to all fish. Noise from dredging and vessel movements is not expected to result in injury to fish and it is only considered in terms of behavioural response using the criterion above. 13B Predicted Zones of Impact Fish are not expected to experience injury as a result of the piling work beyond approximately 18 m from the source due to individual pile strikes, and 6.8 km in terms of cumulative exposure for fish with mass greater than 2 g. For smaller fish the zone for cumulative noise exposure damage would extend to approximately 10 km. The noise level would reduce to about 150 db re 1 μpa (rms) at approximately 10 km. This zone would be expected to result in behavioural reactions in fish according to the NOAA and USFWS approach. As noted above noise from dredging and vessel movements is not expected to result in injury to fish and it is only considered in terms of behavioural response. Noise levels will meet 150 db re 1 μpa (rms) at 465 m. 13B B Marine Mammals Criteria The criteria in Southall et al (2007) (2) suggest that in order to cause instantaneous injury to cetaceans (including porpoise) resulting in a permanent loss in hearing ability (referred to as permanent threshold shift, PTS), the sound level must exceed 230 decibels (db) re 1 micropascal (μpa) (peak). A thorough review of data relating to studies from pulsed sound was undertaken to support the successful application for a recent (2010) seismic survey project by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) (3). This review considered some of the studies that are considered in the Southall et al study discussed above, and considered the level at which a significant effect was likely. This review noted that the US National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) guidance for cetaceans states that they should not be exposed to pulsed underwater noise at received levels >180 db re 1 μpa (rms). The 180 re 1 μpa (rms) level has not been considered to be the level above which Temporary Threshold Shift (TTS) might occur, but rather that it could not be ruled out. TTS is considered to be auditory fatigue that results in a short term loss of hearing sensitivity rather than permanent hearing damage. The review of published studies suggested that these were appropriate for assessing the significant effects that are likely (rather than the onset of effects). In order to be conservative, a cautious assessment criterion of 180 db re 1 μpa (rms) has been assumed for all Cetacean species in this assessment. The USGS review of literature also concluded that the many studies of criterion for Level B Harassment (ie behavioural responses that are significant enough to result in a change in the animal s natural behaviour rather than purely short term reactions to noise) support the NMFS view that disturbance is generally likely to occur at 160 db re 1 μpa (rms). (1) B M Casper, P S Lobell, HY Yan (2003). The hearing sensitivity of the little skate, Raja erinacea: A comparison of two methods, (2) Southall, B.L., A.E. Bowles, W.T. Ellison, J.J. Finneran, R.L. Gentry, C.R. Greene Jr., D. Kastak, D.R. Ketten, J.H. Miller, P.E. Nachtigall, W.J. Richardson, J.A. Thomas and P.L. Tyack. (2007). Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquatic Mammals 33(4): (3) Haley, B., Ireland, D., and Childs, J.R., (2010). Environmental Assessment for a Marine Geophysical Survey of Parts of the Arctic Ocean, August September 2010, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report , version B-5
6 For non-pulsed sounds such as dredging a noise assessment criterion of 120 db re 1 μpa (rms). This has also been applied to vessel movements, but it is expected that these will only generate noise over a limited period of time so that the effect will be lower than for dredging. Information on the hearing sensitivity of the West African manatee Trichechus senegalensis is not available, however, West Indian manatees have a reported hearing ability of between 15 Hz and 46 khz with the best sensitivity at 6-20 khz (1) (2). Other data suggest West Indian manatees are most sensitive around khz but are less sensitive at 4 khz and even 8 khz, although there was some sensitivity up to 35 khz (3). Research has indicated that elevated sound levels affect the behavioural patterns of the Florida manatee (a subspecies of the West Indian manatee) (4). In the absence of more specific data it has been assumed that they are no more sensitive than other marine mammals in this assessment. 13B Predicted Zones of Impact Marine mammals are not expected to experience injury as a result of single impulses from piling even at 10 m according to Southall et al criterion (230 db re 1 μpa (peak)). NMFS criteria at which temporary threshold shift cannot be ruled out (180 db re 1 μpa (rms) are expected to be exceeded at 100 m from the source. However, temporary threshold shifts will not result in a long term effect. Behavioural disturbance is expected above 160 db re 1 μpa (rms) and this is predicted to occur at m. As noted above noise from dredging and vessel movements is not expected to result in injury to marine mammals and it is only considered in terms of behavioural response. Noise levels will meet 120 db re 1 μpa rms) at m. Marine mammal populations have been noted close to shipping lanes and ports and these results should be considered in this context. Prediction at large distances is also subject to a large degree of uncertainty, and simple calculations tend to ignore site specific factors that will affect noise propagation in river environments. These factors include attenuation as noise travels around bends or over shallower water. The predictions presented here are expected to be worst case estimations of the impact zones. 13B B Turtles Criteria There are no reliable data in the scientific literature for the assessment of temporary or permanent hearing damage for turtles. Criteria for behavioural reactions to pulsed sounds ie piling noise have been based on the work by (McCauley), which suggests that behavioural reactions on caged turtles would be expected 166 (beginning of behavioural response) to 175 db re 1 μpa (rms) (likely avoidance reaction level). A study by Weir (5) argues that an assessment of turtle behaviour in relation to seismic surveys is hindered by the apparent reaction of individuals to the ship and towed equipment rather than specifically to airgun sound. These reactions occurred at close range (usually <10 m) to approaching objects and appeared to be based principally on visual detection. On this basis a quantitative criterion has not been adopted for dredging or vessels. (1) Richardson, JW., Greene, CR., Malme, CI. and Thomson, DH. (1995). Marine Mammals and Noise. Academic Press. 576 pages. (2) Gerstein, ER., Gerstein, L., Forsythe, SE. and Blue, JE. (1999). The underwater audiogram of the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Volume 105, Issue 6, pp (3) Gerstein, ER., Gerstein, L., Forsythe, SE. and Blue, JE. (1999). The underwater audiogram of the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Volume 105, Issue 6, pp (4) Miksis-Olds, J.L. and Wagner, T. (2011). Behavioral response of manatees to variations in environmental sound levels. Marine Mammal Science Volume 27, Issue 1, pages (5) Observations of Marine Turtles in Relation to Seismic Airgun Sound off Angola, Marine Turtle Newsletter 116:17-20, B-6
7 13B Predicted Zones of Impact The predictions of piling noise show that noise levels would exceed the impact criteria for behavioural reactions between approximately 215 m and 858 m. However, the predicted ranges based on these criteria need to be seen in the context of Marine Mammal Observer (MMO) studies during other activities such as seismic surveys, where turtles were observed close to the vessel. It would not have been possible to determine subtle behavioural reactions from the vessel based observations, but the presence on a regular basis suggested that noise from the vessel would not deter turtles from using the area. Table 13B.2 Summary of Impact Zone Sizes Species Effect Criterion Distance to Meet Criterion (m) Effects of Piling Noise Fish Potentially lethal effect 206 db re 1 μpa (peak) 18 Fish at least 2g Potentially lethal effect Accumulated SEL of 187 db re 1 μpa 2 -sec Fish <2g Potentially lethal effect Accumulated SEL of 183 db re 1 μpa 2 -sec Fish Behavioural effects 150 db re 1 μpa (rms) Marine Mammals Injury 230 db re 1 μpa (peak) Not exceeded for this source Marine Mammals Potential Temporary Threshold Shift 180 db re 1 μpa (rms) 100 Marine Mammals Behavioural effects 160 db re 1 μpa (rms) Turtles Injury and hearing damage No criteria available Not applicable Turtles Behavioural effects 166 to 175 db re 1 μpa (rms) 215 to 858 m Effects of Vessels / Dredging Fish Behavioural effects 150 db re 1 μpa (rms) 464 Marine Mammals Behavioural effects 120 db re 1 μpa (rms) Turtles Behavioural effects None available May not react until within a few metres 13B-7
Assessment of cumulative Sound Exposure Levels (SEL) for marine piling events
Assessment of cumulative Sound Exposure Levels (SEL) for marine piling events P A Lepper 1, S P Robinson 2, M A Ainslie 3, P D Theobald 2, C A F de Jong 4 1 Loughborough University, Leicestershire, U K,
More informationCaltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving 2014 update
Caltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving 2014 update Richard RODKIN 1 ; Keith POMMERENCK 2 1 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., United States 2 Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., United States
More informationMEASUREMENT OF LONG-TERM AMBIENT NOISE AND TIDAL TURBINE LEVELS IN THE BAY OF FUNDY
MEASUREMENT OF LONG-TERM AMBIENT NOISE AND TIDAL TURBINE LEVELS IN THE BAY OF FUNDY 11 th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, 3 July 2012 Bruce Martin 1, Andrew Gerber 2, Christopher Whitt 1,
More informationSEISMIC SURVEY GREENLAND 2014 Underwater sound propagation for North East Greenland offshore seismic survey
TGS February 2014 SEISMIC SURVEY GREENLAND 2014 Underwater sound propagation for North East Greenland offshore seismic survey Appendix: NEG14 modelling results Mark Mikaelsen PROJECT Seismic Survey Greenland
More informationJanek LAANEARU and Aleksander KLAUSON Department of Mechanics, Tallinn University of Technology
seminar in Tallinn, 5.01.013 PRINCIPAL UNDERWATER NOISE SOURCES IN BALTIC SEA AND METRICS USED IN NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT Janek LAANEARU and Aleksander KLAUSON Department of Mechanics, Tallinn University
More informationPRINCIPAL UNDERWATER NOISE SOURCES IN BALTIC SEA AND METRICS USED IN NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT
Tallinn meeting 25.01.2013 PRINCIPAL UNDERWATER NOISE SOURCES IN BALTIC SEA AND METRICS USED IN NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT Janek LAANEARU and Aleksander KLAUSON Department of Mechanics, Tallinn University
More informationEffect on Marine Life by Noise of Offshore Wind Farm S.JIANG 1 & J.P. HOU 1
5th International Conference on Advanced Design and Manufacturing Engineering (ICADME 2015) Effect on Marine Life by Noise of Offshore Wind Farm S.JIANG 1 & J.P. HOU 1 1 Third Institute of Oceangraphy,SOA,Xiamen,Fujian,China
More informationUse of a low power, airgun sound source to accurately determine sound. Transmission Loss characteristics at the proposed Robin Rigg. Windfarm site.
Submitted to: Submitted by: The Scottish Executive On behalf of: Mr M J Swanwick Mr S J Parvin EON-UK Subacoustech Ltd Westwood Way Chase Mill Westwood Business Park Winchester Road Coventry Bishop s Waltham
More informationIntroduction to Underwater Acoustics Simulator. Poul Kronborg Product Area Owner, Marine MIKE Software Products DHI
Introduction to Underwater Acoustics Simulator Poul Kronborg Product Area Owner, Marine MIKE Software Products DHI pok@dhigroup.com Module Overview for Marine MIKE Software: Release 2014 Hydrodynamics
More informationChapter 20.0 Marine Noise and Vibration
Chapter 20.0 Marine Noise and Vibration www.tidallagoonswanseabay.com www.tidallagooncardiff.com 20.0 Marine Noise and Vibration 20.1 Overview of existing situation 20.1.0.1 Estuaries by their nature (relatively
More informationMeasurement of underwater noise arising from marine aggregate operations
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Measurement of underwater noise arising from marine aggregate operations This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by
More informationAppendix G: Underwater Acoustics
Appendix G: Underwater Acoustics Appendix G.1: Underwater Noise Modelling Submitted to: Jonathan Ashburner Affric Limited Lochview Office Loch Duntelchaig Farr Inverness IV2 6AW Submitted by: Sam East
More informationSR 411, Lexington Bridge Underwater Noise Monitoring Results
Northwest Region 157 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 3331 Seattle, WA 98133-971 Washington State Department of Transportation Douglas B. MacDonald Secretary of Transportation September 21, 26 (26) 44-4 TTY:
More informationBiological & Behavioral Response Studies of. Marine Mammals in Southern California, BRS.org. Photos taken under NMFS permit #
Biological & Behavioral Response Studies of Marine Mammals in Southern California, 2015 ( SOCAL- 15) www.socal- BRS.org Photos taken under NMFS permit #14534-2 1 SOCAL- 15 OVERVIEW SOCAL- 15 continues
More informationBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY JOINT STATEMENT OF EXPERTS IN THE FIELD OF MARINE MAMMALS
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY IN THE MATTER of the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2012 AND IN THE MATTER of an Application for Marine D u m p
More informationBenefit of ESTCP/SERDP Research Program on Underwater Explosive Safety
Benefit of ESTCP/SERDP Research Program on Underwater Explosive Safety Timothy W. Shelton, PE Supervisory Research Hydraulic Engineer ERDC CHL Oct 2017 DoD has very few options for disposing UXO recovered
More informationUnderwater Sound Level Report: I-90 Keechelus Lake Avalanche Bridge Blasting
I-90 SNOQUALMIE PASS EAST Underwater Sound Level Report: I-90 Keechelus Lake Avalanche Bridge Blasting Prepared by: Jim Laughlin Washington State Department of Transportation Office of Air Quality and
More informationAPPENDIX 9.8-A. Construction and Terminal Activity Underwater Noise Modelling Study Technical Report
APPENDIX 9.8-A Construction and Terminal Activity Underwater Noise Modelling Study Technical Report PORT METRO VANCOUVER Roberts Bank Terminal 2 This page is intentionally left blank ROBERTS BANK TERMINAL
More informationReview of new information on pollution, underwater sound and disturbance: Military, including munitions
ASCOBANS 14 th Advisory Committee Meeting Document AC14/Doc. 27(O) San Sebastián, Spain, 19 21 April 2007 Dist. 19 April 2007 Agenda Item 6.5.2: Review of new information on pollution, underwater sound
More informationDECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA. Douglas H. Cato. Defence Science and Technology Organisation PO Box 44, Pyrmont, NSW, 2009, Australia
FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA AMBIENT SEA NOISE IN AUSTRALIAN WATERS Douglas H. Cato Defence Science and Technology Organisation PO
More informationDescription of Underwater Noise Attenuation System Design Unit 2. New NY Bridge Project
New NY Bridge Project Description of Underwater Noise Attenuation System (NAS) Design Unit 2 Description of Underwater Noise Attenuation System Design Unit 2 for the New NY Bridge Project Revision 1 May
More informationMarine Mammals. James M. Price. Division of Environmental Sciences. from NOAA photograph library
Marine Mammals from NOAA photograph library James M. Price James.Price@boem.gov Division of Environmental Sciences Environmental Studies Program R/V Pisces (from NOAA Web site) Develops and oversees applied
More informationI. Monitoring and Adaptive Management Approach. Potential Effects, Monitoring Studies & Mitigation
I. Monitoring and Adaptive Management Approach Define the problem or management objective. Determine potential effects of the project on indicator species. Emphasis on examining potentially negative, rather
More informationEvidence of Anton van Helden in the matter of the applications by Trans Tasman Resources Limited for marine and discharge consents to recover iron
Evidence of Anton van Helden in the matter of the applications by Trans Tasman Resources Limited for marine and discharge consents to recover iron sand in the South Taranaki Bight Qualifications of Anton
More informationASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum
Purpose The purpose of this document is to improve the understanding and transparency of the Commission s stock assessment process and results. It is the first of several that will be developed throughout
More informationAppendix F: Ecology F-6 Methodology for Estimating Potential Hydroacoustic Impacts to Abundant Hudson River Fish Species and Shortnose Sturgeon from
Appendix F: Ecology F-6 Methodology for Estimating Potential Hydroacoustic Impacts to Abundant Hudson River Fish Species and Shortnose Sturgeon from Pile-driving Activities during Construction of the Tappan
More informationMarine noise inputs Technical Note on Underwater Noise Statoil ASA
Marine noise inputs Technical Note on Underwater Noise Statoil ASA Assignment Number: Document Number: A100142-S20 A-100142-S20-TECH-001 Xodus Group Ltd. Kenneth Dibben House Enterprise Road, Southampton
More informationEnerginet.dk. Horns Rev 3 Offshore Wind Farm. Technical report no. 21 UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLINIG
Energinet.dk Horns Rev 3 Offshore Wind Farm Technical report no. 21 UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLINIG APRIL 2014 Energinet.dk Horns Rev 3 Offshore Wind Farm UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLING Client Consultant Sub-consultants
More informationWODA Technical Guidance on Underwater Sound in Relation to Dredging
WODA Technical Guidance on Underwater Sound in Relation to Dredging Frank Thomsen, Fabrizio Borsani, Pim de Wit, Douglas Clarke, Christ de Jong, Frederik Goethals, Martine Holtkamp, Gerard van Raalte,
More informationASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum
Introduction This document presents a summary of the 217 stock assessments for red drum. These assessments were initially conducted through the Southeast Data, Assessment and Review (SEDAR) process using
More informationMonitoring Factsheet: Underwater Noise
Monitoring Factsheet: Underwater Noise October 2015 1. Subject: Underwater Noise Underwater noise refers to anthropogenic sound that has the potential to cause negative impacts on the marine environment,
More informationFinal. Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile Driving on Fish
Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile Driving on Fish Prepared for: California Department of Transportation 1120 N Street Sacramento, CA 94274 Contact: Jim Andrews Prepared by: ICF Jones & Stokes
More informationFine-Scale Survey of Right and Humpback Whale Prey Abundance and Distribution
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Fine-Scale Survey of Right and Humpback Whale Prey Abundance and Distribution Joseph D. Warren School of Marine and Atmospheric
More informationDO NOT PRINT THIS PAGE
DO NOT PRINT THIS PAGE 17 Noise 371 17.1 Introduction 371 17.2 Baseline Environment 371 17.3 Potential Effects 380 17.4 Sensitivity of receptors 385 17.5 Potential Significance of Effects 389 17.6 Likelihood
More informationWESTHAVEN MARINA EXTENSION ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT Rp December 2017
WESTHAVEN MARINA EXTENSION ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT Rp 001 20170963 22 December 2017 84 Symonds Street PO Box 5811 Wellesley Street Auckland 1141 New Zealand T: +64 9 379 7822 F: +64 9 309 3540 www.marshallday.com
More informationUnderwater sound in relation to dredging
CEDA Underwater sound in relation to dredging Dr. Frank Thomsen DHI Group Underwater sound and dredging http://www.dredging.org/, special thanks to Anna Csiti 23 4 2013 2 Outline Sound and marine life
More informationPile Driving and Barotrauma Effects
Pile Driving and Barotrauma Effects AASHTO SOC Louisville, KY Jeff Lewis, Field Operations Engineer Federal Highway Administration California Division Transportation Needs Capacity Strength Constructability
More informationJIP Aversion Modeling Final Report. Adam S. Frankel, Ph.D. William T. Ellison, Ph.D. Andrew W. White, Ph.D. Kathleen J. Vigness Raposa, Ph.D.
JIP Aversion Modeling Final Report Adam S. Frankel, Ph.D. William T. Ellison, Ph.D. Andrew W. White, Ph.D. Kathleen J. Vigness Raposa, Ph.D. Marine Acoustics, Inc. MAI 947 31 July 2016 TN 16 015 Table
More informationSpecies and Area Protection with Regards to Offshore Wind Farms. Dr. Folchert R. van Dijken
Species and Area Protection with Regards to Offshore Wind Farms Dr. Folchert R. van Dijken 25 January 2012 2 Economic activities on the NL Continental shelf Shipping - 260,000 movements - Seaport like
More informationCentre for Marine Science and Technology
Centre for Marine Science and Technology Prediction of underwater noise associated with the operation of a drilling rig in the Great Australian Bight Prepared for: BP Developments Australia Pty Ltd Prepared
More informationSheepshead Fishery Overview South Atlantic State/Federal Management Board May 2014 Introduction Life History Landings
Sheepshead Fishery Overview South Atlantic State/Federal Management Board May 2014 Introduction The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) does not currently manage sheepshead (Archosargus
More informationAnthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment
Anthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment R. Hillson and H.-J. Shyu Information Technology Division Introduction: The impact of anthropogenic noise on the marine environment is a subject of increasing
More informationShell Namibia Deepwater Exploration Well Drilling. Underwater Noise Impact Assessment. Report Number R01. 8 August 2017
SLR Consulting (Cape Town office) Unit 39, Roeland Square Cnr Roeland Street and Drury Lane, Cape Town, Western Cape, 8001 Version: v3.0 Page 2 PREPARED BY: ABN 29 001 584 612 589 Hay Street Jolimont
More informationEvaluation of fisheries sonar s for whale detection in relation to seismic survey operations
Evaluation of fisheries sonar s for whale detection in relation to seismic survey operations Simrad AS Norwegian Defense Research Establishment Institute of Marine Research 2 Preface The International
More informationCOWRIE Ltd, 2008 Published by COWRIE Ltd.
COWRIE SEAGEN-07-07 Measurement and assessment of background underwater noise and its comparison with noise from pin pile drilling operations during installation of the SeaGen tidal turbine device, Strangford
More information~ A Behavioral Response Study in 2007 &2008 (BRS 07/08) was conducted in the Bahamas to
Biological and Behavioral Response Studies in the Bahamas in 27 28 (BRS 7/8) ~ Project Summary ~ ~ A Behavioral Response Study in 27 &28 (BRS 7/8) was conducted in the Bahamas to study diving behavior
More informationAppendix H. Modelling and Measurement of Underwater Noise (Subacoustech, 2008)
Appendix H Modelling and Measurement of Underwater Noise (Subacoustech, 2008) Submitted to: Associated British Ports Ocean Gate Atlantic Way Southampton S014 3QN Submitted by: David Lambert Chase Mill
More informationCurrents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay
Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay M. Fossati, D. Bellón, E. Lorenzo & I. Piedra-Cueva Fluid Mechanics and Environmental Engineering Institute (IMFIA), School of Engineering, Research
More informationSEISMIC EXPLORATION POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON FINFISH AND INVERTEBRATE SPECIES
SEISMIC EXPLORATION POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON FINFISH AND INVERTEBRATE SPECIES The amount of marine seismic shot in British Columbia waters during the last 40 years has been minimal compared to that in Eastern
More informationUnderwater noise and offshore windfarms
Underwater noise and offshore windfarms Dr Jeremy Nedwell, Mr John Langworthy and Mr Daren Howell BWEA Conference 4/3/04 Subacoustech reference: 544R0503, COWRIE Copyright. Aim of study To evaluate the
More informationThe broadband acoustic output of marine seismic airgun sources"
Title Slide Underwater Noise Measurement, Impact and Mitigation, 14-15 Oct 2008, Southampton................................................................................... The broadband acoustic output
More informationunder: the Resource Management Act 1991
Before Hearing Commissioners at Christchurch under: the Resource Management Act 1991 in the matter of: applications CRC175507, CRC176030, CRC175508, CRC175509, CRC175510 to reclaim land and construct a
More informationTakes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/20/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-20310, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 3510-22-P DEPARTMENT OF
More informationFine-scale Focal DTAG Behavioral Study in the Gulf of Maine
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Fine-scale Focal DTAG Behavioral Study in the Gulf of Maine Alessandro Bocconcelli Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
More informationBriefing on the IWC s Conservation Committee
Briefing on the IWC s Conservation Committee 1 June 2005 Taking the IWC Conservation Committee forward At its 55 th Annual Meeting in 2003, the International Whaling Commission voted to establish a Conservation
More informationIOTC 2015 SC18 ES06[E]
DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: BULLET TUNA Status of the Indian Ocean bullet tuna (BLT: Auxis rochei) resource TABLE 1. Bullet tuna: Status of bullet tuna (Auxis rochei) in the Indian Ocean. Area 1 Indicators
More informationUNDERWATER SOUND LEVELS ASSOCIATED WITH PILE DRIVING AT THE CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY, WAVE BARRIER PROJECT
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT WAVE BARRIER PROJECT UNDERWATER SOUND LEVELS ASSOCIATED WITH PILE DRIVING AT THE CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT BOAT LAUNCH FACILITY, WAVE BARRIER PROJECT Prepared by: Jim
More informationMinimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait
Minimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait Introduction Scott Veirs, Beam Reach Val Veirs, Colorado College December 2, 2007 Assessing the effect of wind and currents
More informationFinal Report: Measurements of Pile Driving Noise from Control Piles and Noise-Reduced Piles at the Vashon Island Ferry Dock
Final Report: Measurements of Pile Driving Noise from Control Piles and Noise-Reduced Piles at the Vashon Island Ferry Dock By Peter H. Dahl, Jim Laughlin, and David R. Dall Osto Executive Summary Underwater
More informationUnderwater noise The other pollution
Rebecca Schneider Dept. Natural Resources, Cornell Univ. Underwater noise The other pollution https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ikwqx31mans/maxresdefault.jpg Light decreases with depth in lakes http://academic.keystone.edu/jskinner/limnology/light_in_lakes_lecturenotes.htm
More informationModelling of subsea noise during the proposed piling operations at the Dudgeon Wind Farm
Submitted to: Frank Fortune Royal Haskoning DHV Submitted by: Tim Mason Unit 9, Claylands Park Claylands Road Bishop s Waltham Hampshire SO32 1QD Tel: +44 (0) 131 561 2295 Tel: +44 (0)1489 892 881 Fax:
More informationExperiment and Analysis of the Response of Fish to Frequencies
Experiment and Analysis of the Response of Fish to Frequencies Kang Su Jin 1, Kang Joon Gu 2,Lee Chang Hun 1,Kim JongTae 1 * 1 (Nature & Technology Inc., Republic of Korea) 2 (Department of Land, Water
More information14 NOISE AND VIBRATION
14 NOISE AND VIBRATION 14.1 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 14.1.1 The noise environment within Poole Harbour is generally characterised by low to medium noise levels depending on location. For example, certain areas
More information8 TH MEETING DOCUMENT BYC-08 INF-A
INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION WORKING GROUP ON BYCATCH 8 TH MEETING La Jolla, California (USA) 10-11 May 2018 DOCUMENT BYC-08 INF-A WHALE SHARK INTERACTIONS WITH THE TUNA PURSE-SEINE FISHERY
More informationMONITORING PROGRAMME FOR THE MAASVLAKTE 2, PART III THE EFFECTS OF UNDERWATER SOUND
Monitoring Programme for the Maasvlakte 2, Part III - The Effects of Underwater Sound 21 FLOOR HEINIS, CHRIST DE JONG, MICHAEL AINSLIE, WIL BORST AND TIEDO VELLINGA MONITORING PROGRAMME FOR THE MAASVLAKTE
More informationGreen Sturgeon Feeding Observations in Humboldt Bay, California
Green Sturgeon Feeding Observations in Humboldt Bay, California Matt Goldsworthy 1, Bill Pinnix, Miles Barker 1, Liz Perkins 1, Aaron David, Jeffrey Jahn 1 Introduction Understanding the distribution,
More informationWest Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history
West Coast Rock Lobster Description of sector History of the fishery: The commercial harvesting of West Coast rock lobster commenced in the late 1800s, and peaked in the early 1950s, yielding an annual
More informationEastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Sea Turtle Mitigation Plan (TMP)
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FIFTH REGULAR SESSION 10-21 August 2009 Port Vila, Vanuatu Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Sea Turtle Mitigation Plan (TMP) WCPFC-SC5-2009/EB-IP-15 Australian Government Department
More informationWhite Rose Extension Project
White Rose Extension Project Underwater Sound Propagation June 2012 Underwater Sound Propagation Assessment for the Environmental Assessment of the White Rose Extension Project Submitted to: Stantec Inc.
More informationFin Whale. Appendix A: Marine Wildlife. Balaenoptera physalus. New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix A Marine-38. Federal Listing.
Fin Whale Balaenoptera physalus Federal Listing State Listing Global Rank Rank Regional Status E not tracked G3G4TNR State Very High Photo by Christin Khan, NOAA/NEFSC Justification (Reason for Concern
More informationMichael Tehan, Assistant Regional Administrator, Interior Columbia Basin Office
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Northwest Fisheries Science Center Fish Ecology Division 2725 Montlake Boulevard East
More informationObserving the behavioral response of herring exposed to mid-frequency sonar signals
Observing the behavioral response of herring exposed to mid-frequency sonar signals Handegard 1, Nils Olav and Doksaeter 1, Lise and Godoe 1, Olav Rune and Kvadsheim 2, Petter H. 1 Institute of Marine
More informationComparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare
Comparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare Stock and Fisheries Status Seminar Brussels, 26 September 2017 Why comparing the EU and the US? Need to put the
More informationGroundfish Endangered Species Workgroup Report
Agenda Item D.4.a Supplemental GF ESA Workgroup PowerPoint (Electronic Only) June 2015 Groundfish Endangered Species Workgroup Report June 2015 Pacific Fishery Management Council Meeting Biological Opinions
More informationGIBRALTAR MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (Ministry of Maritime Affairs)
GIBRALTAR MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (Ministry of Maritime Affairs) Watergate House Tel (+350) 200 46862 / 47771 / 50424 2/8 Casemates Square Fax (+350) 200 47770 Gibraltar e-mail: maritime.survey@gibraltar.gov.gi
More informationIntroduction. o 2. ! "#$ % & ' (" 4 Watt/m 2. Major
07, 08 9 07%, 8 Abstract Killer whale pods sometimes hunt herring by corralling the fish into a tight ball near the ocean surface and stunning them with underwater tail slaps before eating them. I asked
More informationUnalaska Navigation Channel Improvements
1 237 237 237 255 255 255 0 0 0 Unalaska Navigation Channel Improvements 217 217 217 200 200 200 163 163 163 131 132 122 239 65 53 80 119 27 252 174.59 110 135 120 112 92 56 62 102 130 102 56 48 130 120
More informationThe Impact of Offshore Wind Turbines on Underwater Ambient Noise Levels. Stewart Glegg Center for Acoustics and Vibration Florida Atlantic University
The Impact of Offshore Wind Turbines on Underwater Ambient Noise Levels Stewart Glegg Center for Acoustics and Vibration Florida Atlantic University Why is Offshore WT Noise a Concern? 1. With the current
More informationSILENT CLASS NOTATION
RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS NEWBUILDINGS SPECIAL EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS ADDITIONAL CLASS PART 6 CHAPTER 24 SILENT CLASS NOTATION JANUARY 2010 CONTENTS PAGE Sec. 1 General Requirements... 5 Sec. 2
More informationRESOLUTION 4.17 GUIDELINES TO ADDRESS THE IMPACT OF ANTHROPOGENIC NOISE ON CETACEANS IN THE ACCOBAMS AREA
RESOLUTION 4.17 GUIDELINES TO ADDRESS THE IMPACT OF ANTHROPOGENIC NOISE ON CETACEANS IN THE ACCOBAMS AREA The Meeting of the Parties to the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black Sea,
More informationCharacterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements
Characterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements LONG-TERM GOAL Grant Deane Marine Physical Laboratory Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA 93093-0213 phone: (619) 534-0536 fax:
More informationWave Prediction in the Santa Barbara Channel
Wave Prediction in the Santa Barbara Channel OCS Study MMS 2001-055 Final Technical Summary Final Study Report U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Pacific OCS Region Wave Prediction
More informationAppendix Template for Submission of Scientific Information To Describe Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas
Appendix Template for Submission of Scientific Information To Describe Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas Abstract (in less than 150 words) Coastal and marine areas: Africa Somalia has
More informationStatus: Rev: Comments Date: Authors: Reviewer:
KENNEDY POINT MARINA ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT Rp 001 r05 2016226A 20 February 2017 84 Symonds Street PO Box 5811 Wellesley Street Auckland 1141 New Zealand T: +64 9 379 7822 F: +64 9 309 3540 www.marshallday.com
More informationDevelopments in managing small pelagic fisheries
Developments in managing small pelagic fisheries Prof Ray Hilborn Your essential event for networking and information Impacts of fishing forage fish on their predators: Progress report October 2017 Ray
More informationA-7 End of Survey Environmental Report Marine Seismic Survey
A-7 End of Survey Environmental Report Marine Seismic Survey Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 Purpose... 3 2. ACTIVITY SUMMARY... 3 3. THAZIN MSS MFO MITIGATION SUMMARY... 4 3.1 Summary information...
More informationTHE SAFEGUARDING OF MARINE MAMMALS DEVELOPMENT OF DETECTION METHODS IN A BLAST ENVIRONMENT. Vincent Capizzi, Thomas Boxoen, Mark Blake, Anne Shen
ICSV14 Cairns Australia 9-12 July, 2007 THE SAFEGUARDING OF MARINE MAMMALS DEVELOPMENT OF DETECTION METHODS IN A BLAST ENVIRONMENT Vincent Capizzi, Thomas Boxoen, Mark Blake, Anne Shen Abstract Heggies
More informationASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Black Drum
Introduction This document presents a summary of the 215 benchmark stock assessment for black drum. The assessment was peerreviewed by an independent panel of scientific experts through the ASMFC integrated
More informationHydroacoustic survey of Otsego Lake, 2004
Hydroacoustic survey of Otsego Lake, 2004 Thomas E. Brooking 1 Mark D. Cornwell 2 INTRODUCTION Fishery managers must often rely on uncertain information regarding abundance and distribution of offshore
More informationCorrib Ocean Bottom Cable Seismic Survey
. se ru he ot to f c Fo op r i yr ns ig pe ht ct ow ion ne pu r r rp eq os ui es re o d nl fo y. ra ny Shell Exploration and Production Ireland Ltd Co ns en Corrib Ocean Bottom Cable Seismic Survey Natura
More informationPost Model Quantitative Analysis. of Animal Avoidance Behavior and Mitigation Effectiveness. for Northwest Training and Testing Activities
Post Model Quantitative Analysis of Animal Avoidance Behavior and Mitigation Effectiveness for Northwest Training and Testing Activities Technical Report Suggested citation: U.S. Department of the Navy.
More informationREGIONAL AND LOCAL VARIATION OF BOTTOM FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS
M. James Allen and Robert Voglin REGIONAL AND LOCAL VARIATION OF BOTTOM FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS One of the projects included in our recently completed research for the EPA was an assessment of
More informationLoughs Agency. Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission. Pre-Fishery Stock Assessment Lough Foyle Native Oyster Fishery.
Loughs Agency Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission Pre-Fishery Stock Assessment Lough Foyle Native Oyster Fishery Summary Report Autumn 216 1 Aquaculture & Shellfisheries Report Reference LA/Y/216
More informationNORD STREAM 2 UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLING, FINLAND
Intended for Nord Stream 2 AG Date December, 2016 Document number W-PE-EIA-PFI-REP-805-030600EN-05 NORD STREAM 2 UNDERWATER NOISE MODELLING, FINLAND 1 of 32 Revision 05 Date 2016-12-07 Document ID W-PE-EIA-PFI-REP-805-030600EN-05
More informationUpdate on recent modifications of fishing gear and fishing procedures to reduce bycatch of sea turtles in longline fishery
TC:STCF/2004/DMA.2 Update on recent modifications of fishing gear and fishing procedures to reduce bycatch of sea turtles in longline fishery Thomas Moth-Poulsen FAO Fishery Industry Officer (Fish Technology)
More informationSMOOTH HAMMERHEAD SHARK (HHS)
SMOOTH HAMMERHEAD SHARK (HHS) (Sphyrna zygaena) HHS1 1. FISHERY SUMMARY Smooth hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna zygaena) are not currently managed under the QMS. No assigned fishing allowances exist. However,
More informationThree different funding sources funded different facets of the research.
Three different funding sources funded different facets of the research. In November 2014, the research team received monies from the N.C. Marine Fisheries Commission s Conservation Fund, with matching
More informationARA PROJECT Prepared by: Peter T. Dzwilewski Applied Research Associates, Inc Shaffer Parkway Littleton, Colorado 80127
ARA PROJECT 001974 WATER SHOCK PREDICTION FOR EXPLOSIVE REMOVAL OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES: UNDERWATER CALCULATOR (UWC) VERSION 2.0 UPDATE BASED UPON FIELD DATA Prepared by: Peter T. Dzwilewski Applied Research
More informationSTATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL
August 23 STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL performed by Lee E. Harris, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting
More informationSan Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Seismic Safety Project FISHERIES AND HYDROACOUSTIC MONITORING PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REPORT
San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge East Span Seismic Safety Project FISHERIES AND HYDROACOUSTIC MONITORING PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REPORT JUNE 2004 EA 012023 04-SF-80 KP 12.2/KP 14.3 04-ALA-80 KP 0.0/KP 2.1 Sa
More information