3. Originator's Name, Organization, MSIN, 4. USQ Required? 5. Date and Telenhane No. T. Nuxall, CVDF, R3-86, [XI Yes [] NO 6/19/

Transcription

1 2. ECN Category (ark one) Suppleental [I Direct Revision 1x1 Change ECN [I Teporary 11 Standby Supersedure 11 [I CancelNoid [I 12a. Modification Work [] Yes (till out Blk. I2b) [XI No (NA Blks. I2b, 12c, 12d) ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE 2 P.0. 1 Of - 3. Originator's Nae, Organization, MSIN, 4. USQ Required? 5. Date and Telenhane No. T. Nuxall, CVDF, R3-86, [XI Yes [] NO 6/19/ ~.EW hi. ECN 6. Project TitlelNo.lWork Order No. 7. Bldg.lSys./Fac. No. 8. Approval Designator SNF/W-441, Spent Nuclear Fuel CVDF SNQ Cold Vacuu Drying 142-K 9. Docuent Nubers Changed by this ECN IO. Related ECN No@). 11. Related PO No. (includes sheet no. and rev.) SNF-3921, Rev. 3, SNF-3927, Rev. 2 NIA N/A SNF-3928, Rev. 1, SNF-3932, Rev. 2, SNF-4627, Rev. 1, SNF-3926, Rev. 2 12b. Work Package 12c. Modification Work Coplete 12d. Restored to Original Candi- No. tion (Tep. or Standby ECN only) NIA NIA N/A Design AuthorityICog. Engineer Signature & Date Design AuthorityICog. Engineer Signature & Date - SNF-3926; This docuent has been cancelled it was previously erged with SNF USQ Approval: CUQ p drd.6 14a. Justification (ark one) CriteriaChangc[] Design ~praveent[~] Environental [] Facility Deactivation[] As-Found[] Facilitate Const[] Canst. ErrorlOissian[] Design ErrorlOission[] 14b. Justification Details Revised to atch previous odifications to SNF The design verification ethod for SS/SC coponents is by independent review in accordance with EN Docuentation of this review is accoplished by the independent review approval signature provided on page 2 of this ECN. See Distribution A

2 16. Design Verification Required [XI Yes [I No ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE Page 2 of ECN (use no. fro pg. 1) 17. Cost Ipact 18. Schedule Ipact (days) Additional Savings ENGINEERING [I $ [I $ CONSTRUCTION Additional Savings [I $ [I $ Iproveent Delay [I [I indicate that the signing organization has been notified of other affected docuents listed below. Docuent NubedRevision Docuent NuberIRevision Docuent Nuber Revision NA Date Jesign Authority C. Misk 6-1 q-oo Design Agent :og. Eng. C. VKatwijk G-&.a, QA Signature Date Jther: C. Haller Other ' Approval authorized parallel preparation of USQ screen nith iplreentatian of ECN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Signature or a Control Nuber that tracks the Approval Signature ADDITIONAL A (05196) GEF096

3 SNF Revision 4 Whitey SCHe Gauge/Root Valves Prepared for the US. Departent of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environental Manageent Project Hanford Manageent Contractor for the U.S. Departent of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200 Fluor Hanford P.O. Box 1000 Richland. Washington Approved for public release; further disseination unliited I- ~ " ~

4 SNF-3921 Revision 4 ECN Whitey SCHe Gauge/Root Valves Project No: W-441 C Van Katwijk FH Docuent Type: RPT Division: SNF Date Published June 2000 Prepared for the U.S. Departent of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environental Manageent Project Hanford Manageent Contractor for the U.S. Departent of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200 Fluor Hanford P.O. Box 1000 Richland, Washington 7AJ# e se Approval Approved for public release; further disseination unliited - - -

5 TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specdz COerCa Proauct process or service by trade nae, tradeark, anufacturer, or othenvise, does not necessarily constitute or iply its endorseent, recoendation, or favoring by the United States Governent or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors This report has been reproduced fro the best available copy. Total Pages: I5 sw - 39a/,,,4

6 RECORD OF REVISION (1) Docuent Nuber SNF-3921 Page 1 (3) Revision Authorized for Release (4) Description of Change - Replace, Add, and Delete Pages (5) Cog. Engr. (6) Cog. Mgr. Date (7) EDT , INITIALLY RELEASED Miska Choho ECN REVISION TO MEET SEL REV. 6 Miska Choho ECN , REVISION TO MEET SEL REV. 6a Miska Choho 3 4 RS, ECN , CLARIFICATION OF VALVE MANUFACTURER Miska Choho ECN , REVISION TO MEET PREVIOUS ECN TO SPEC C / Z h 0 0 A (10/97)

7 Coercial Grade Ite Upgrade Dedication For ECNNo. NA CGI No. CGI-SNF-D-13-P5-024 'Title: WHITEY SCHe CAUGEIROOT VALVES SNF-3921, Rev. 4 Page I or12 Ite No.: NA Manufacturer: Supplier: Mfg. ParVModel No.: Supplier's PIN: Part Description: End Use Description: Equipent No.. SCHe-V-*064,*065, *082,'084 (4000 psig); SCHe-V-*069,*070, *083,*085,*088, *089,*077,*078 (150 psigl Procureent andlor Model No. SS-6PNBGM8-F8 Section 2a Copi Specification No SNF-5304, Rev. 0 (W-441-P5, Rev. 21 ent Inforation Manufacturer Whitey I Swagelok Past P 0 NO. NA --t- Equipent Supplier (if differei fro anufacturer): Equip. Supplier's Part No.: Coponent Description: These valves are 'h" ball valves fabricated of 316 stainless steel. Packing is TFE (standard). They are used as isolation valves for pressure instruentation in the SCHe Syste between the heliu bottle supply anifolds and safety class heliu pressure instruentation, and in lower pressure SCHe supply line. Section 2b Coercial Availability of the Ite 1. Is the Ite available fro a catalogue of a qualified NQAl supplier? (coordinate with project CGI interface Engineer or BTR) [ ] YES (go to #2 below) [XI NO (go to procedure step 5.3.2, proceed to dedicate Ite.) If not available fro a qualified NQAl supplier, is it available fro an IS supplier? (coordinate with project CGI interface Engineer or BTR) [ ] YES (go to #2 below, then go to procedure step 5.3.2, proceed to dedicate Ite) [ X ] NO (go to procedure - s 2. List of Candidate qualified suppliers or IS suppliers copany nae & type contact nae phone NA 3. Recoended Procureent Strategy(co0rdinate with project CGI interface Engineer or BTR): NA

8 I Coercial Grade Ite Upgrade Dedication For ECNNo. NA CGI No. CCI-SNF-D-13-P5-024 Title: WHITEY SCHe GAUGEIROOT VALVES I SNF-3921,Rev 4 Page 2 of 12 Section 2c CGI Deterination 1. Question #1: Is the Ite subject to design or specification requireents that are unique to nuclear facilities or activities? [ ] YES (the Ite is not coercial grade) [ X] NO (continue) 2. Question #2: Is the Ite used in applications other than nuclear facilities or activities? [ ] NO (the ite is not coercial grade) [XI YES (continue) 3. Question #3: Is the Ite ordered fro anufacturerlsupplier on the basis or specifications set forth in the published product inforation (e.g., anufacturer's catalog)? [ ] NO (the Ite is not coercial grade) [XI YES (continue) ; X ] All three criteria have been satisfied. The Ite eets the definition of coercial grade. Section 2d Reason for Dedication - The above described Ite is being Dedicated for use in the application cited for the following reason(s): : X ] Ite is being purchased fro a non ESL anufacturer supplier as coercial grade to be used in a Safety Class application. : ] ] ] Ite is being purchased fro a non ESL anufacturer supplier as coercial grade to be used in a Safety Significant application. Ite was purchased fro a non ESL anufacturer supplier as coercial grade to be used in a Safety Class aeplication. Ite was purchased fro a non ESL anufacturer supplier as coercial grade to be used in a Safety Significant application. 1 Other ('like-for-like', siilar, substitution, replaceent evaluation) Section 3 Failure Effects Evaluation 4. ParVCoponent Safety Function: I. Pressure boundary integritylconfineent. Prevents air inleakagelloss of SCHe during noral operation. Prevent H, Explosion 2. Maintain critical function before and after Seisic event. 3. PaNCoponent Functional Mode: Safety Function #1: [ ] Active - Mechanical or Electrical change of state is required to occur for the coponent to perfor its safety function [ X ] Passive - Change of state is not required for the coponent to perfor its safety function Safety Function #2: [ ] Active - Mechanical or Electrical change of state is required to occur for the coponent to perfor its safety function. [XI Passive - Change of state is not required for the coponent to perfor its safety function Safety Function #3: [ ] Active - Mechanical or Electrical change of state is required to occur for the coponent to perfor its safety function. [ ] Passive - Change of state is not required for the coponent to perfor its safety function 6/19/00

9 ~ ~ Coercial Grade Ite Upgrade Dedication For ELNNa. NA CGI No. CGI-SNF-D-13-P5-024 Title WHITEY SCHe GAUGEIROOT VALVES SNF-3921, Rev 4 Page 3 of 12 C. Host Coponent Safety Function (if applicable): NA 1 D. Failure Mod+) and the effects on coponent or syste safety function (see Worksheet 1): 1, Valve Body BreaklPressure boundary failure. Could cause a loss of SCHe supply fro the - affected bottle and anifold to the MCO. Section 4 Environental & Na Environental Qualification Required: Yes[ 1 No [XI Environental Condition B Natural Phenoena Hazard (NPH) Design Required: Yes [X] No [ 1 HNF-PRO-97, Rev. 0 W-441-P5, Rev. 2 al Phenoena Hazard Design If yes: Environental Qualification Requireents Liiting Environental Conditions: Required Safety Functions: Qualification Period: If yes: NPH Design Requireents Perforance Category PC-3 NPH Design Req'ts.: Seisic Condition A Required Safety Functions: Maintain pressure boundarylconfinernent, prevent H, explosion. - National CodeslStandards ASME Safety Analysis Report (SAR) H$i%&3,f?eU.Oh1An*eL Drawings H , Rev. 2 HNF-SD-SNF-SEL-002, Rev. 6A BBbWa,

10 Coercial Grade Ite Upgrade Dedication For ECNNo. NA CGI No. CGI-SNF-D-13-P Title: WHITEY SCHe GAUGElROOT VALVES SNF-3921, Rev. 4 Page 4 of I2 Critical Characteristics Verification Docuent: Vendor's Manual; HNF-SD-SNF-SEL-002, Rev. 6A 1. Ite Identification Critical Characteristics (necessary for reasonable assurance that the Ite delivered is the Ite specified) Naeplate - Manufacturer Whitey I Swagelok Co. (Note 6) 1, IN X Valve-Coponent Nuber- Procureent andlor Model Nuber Process Connection 2. Physical Critical Characteristics (for Valve Body Material 112" MNPT to 112' FNPT 1, IN X reasonable assurance that the Ite delivered is the Ite specified) Stainless Steel (Note 5) 1, IN X 1. T Process Connection Material Stainless Steel (Note 5) 1, IN X 1. T 3. Perforance Critical Characteristics (for reasonable assurance that the Ite will perfor its intended safety function s)) Boundary Integrity Pressure Test at 4400 psig (No Leakage) 1, T X SCHe-V-*064, *065, *082, Note and "084 Pressure Boundary Integrity Pressure Test at 165 psig (No Leakage) 1, T X SCHe-V-'069. '070. '077. Note "078. '083. '085. '089. and "089 Valve Seat Leakage <0.1 SCClin 4000 psig 1. T X Environental Note 1 Seisic Condition A I Note 2 11.T X 4. Notes and Legend: Acceptance Method: 1. These valves do not have nonetallic parts that are subject to degradation fro the 40 F and 60% RH or 115OF and 22% RH condition and are suitable for Condition B application. 1. Special Test and Inspection 1, IN for Inspection 1,T for Test 2. Coercial Grade Survey 3. Source Verification 4. Vendor/lte History 2. Maintain critical function before and after Seisic event. W- 441-P5, Rev. 2, Appendix 1, page 1-2, provides a seisic testing plan for these coponents at a seisic spectra TBD. Equipent that has been shaker-table tested should not be installed in a plant (Ref. IEEE Standard , Section 7). Consequently, the seisic test constitutes a destructive test Pressure test at 110% of design pressure of 4000 psig. For use of all valves for application at 4000 psig service, pressure test all valves at 4400 psig. Pressure test at 110% of 150 psig syste design pressure. Material verification acceptance ethod ay be by either inspection or test. Either Whitey or Swagelok is acceptable. Section 9 Critical Characteristics Acceptance CriterialTolerances Acceptance ID Fundon Method SS-GPNBGMS-F8, (Per Procureent 1, IN X Package W-441-P5, Rev. 2, Section H, Design Data Sheet)

11 Coercial Grade Ite Upgrade Dedication For ECNNo. NA CGI No. CGI-SNF-D-13-P Title: WHITEY SCHe GAUGElROOT VALVES SNF-3YZI. Rev. 4 Page 5 of 12 Section 10 Initial Review and Approval

12 Coercial Grade Ite Upgrade Dedication For ECNNa. NA CGI No. CCI-SNF-D-13-P5-024 I Title: WHITEY SCHe GAUGE/ROOT VALVES SNF-3921, Rev. 4 Page 6 US 12 WORKSHEET 1 DETERMINATION OF FAILURE MECHANlSMSlMODES SECTION 1 Typical Failure Definition Applicable to Coponent Mechaniss under Evaluation Fracture Separation of a solid accopanied by little or no Yes [ ] No [XI, If Yes, indicate failure acroscopic plastic deforation. Mode Corrosion Erosion Open Circuit The gradual deterioration of a aterial due to cheical or electrocheical reactions, such as oxidation, between the aterial and its environent. Destruction of aterials by the abrasive action of oving fluids, usually accelerated by the presence of solid particles carried with the fluid. An electrical circuit that is unintentionally broken so that there is no coplete path for current flow. Yes [ ] Mode Yes [ ] Mode Yes [ ] Mode No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure No [ XI; If Yes, indicate failure Short Circuit Blockage Seizure Unacceptable Vibration Loss of Properties Excess Strain An abnoral connection by which an electrical current is connected to ground, or to soe conducting body, resulting in excessive current flow. Clogging of a filtering ediu resulting in the inability to perfor its purification function or blockage of flow. Binding of a norally oving ite through excessive pressure, teperature, friction, jaing. Mechanical oscillations produced are beyond the defined perissible liits due to unbalancing, poor support, or rotation at critical speeds. A loss of echanical and physical properties of a aterial due to exposure to high teperatures, radiation exposure. Under the action of excessive external forces the aterial of the part has been defored or distorted. Yes [ ] Mode No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure Yes [ ] No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure Mode Yes [ ] Mode No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure Yes [ ] No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure Yes [ ] Yes [ ] Mode No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure Mechanical Creep Fro prolonged exposure to high teperature and stress, the object will show a slow change in its Yes [ ] No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure physical (shape and diension) and echanical characteristics. Ductile Fracture Fracture characterized by tearing of etal Yes [ ] No [XI; If Yes, indicate failure accopanied by appreciable gross plastic Mode deforation Section 2 Additional Failure Modes Applicable to lhe Coponent Under Evaluation 1 Valve Body Break 6/19/00 -

13 .. -. I Coercial Grade Ite Urade Dedication For ECNNo. NA CGI No. CGI-SNF-D-lJ-P5-024 Title: WHITEY SCHe GAUGE/ROOT VALVES SNF-3921, Rev. 4 Page 7 of 12 Ite Description. Whitey I Swagelock SCHe GaugelRoot Valve Syste #: 13 Whitey Co. Manufacturer (AddressiPhone): 318 Bishop Road Highland Heights, OH P.O. # CHECKLIST 1 ACCEPTANCE METHOD I SPECIAL TEST/INS 2CTION VERIFICATION ICTlON I Equip #: SCHe-V-'064. '065. '082, ' psigl; SCHe-V-'069. *070, "083. '085. *088, *089.*077, '078 (150 psig) Procureent and/or Model #: SS-6PNBGM8-F8 Supplier (AddresdPhone): I I 1. Naeplate - Manufacturer I I 2. Valve-Coponent Nuber-Procureent andlor Model Nuber I 1 3. Process Connection I1 4. Valve Body Material (Verification ay be by either inspection or test) I I 1 5. Process Connection Material (Verification ay be by either inspection or I I I I 7. ValveSeat Leakage I 1 8. Seisic Condition A 6. Pressure Boundary Integrity 6/19/00

14 _- 1 Coercial Grade Ite Unade Dedication For I SNF-3921, Rev. 4 I ECNNo. NA CGI No. CCI-SNF-D-13-P5-024 Tillc. WHITEY SCHe GAUGEIROOT VALVES Pagc 8 ot 12 SECTION 3 BY INSPECTION * See Attachent G of Desk Instruction for Sapling Size Characteristic: Naeplate - Manufacturer Saple Size*: All Ites Acceptance Criteria: Whitey I Swagelok Co. (Either Whitey or Swagelok is acceptable) Receipt Inspection Plan I Report #: References (see Section 7): Characteristic: Valve-Coponent Nuber-Procureent andlor Model Nuber Saple Size*: All Ites Acceptance Criteria: SS-GPNBGM8-Fa Receipt Inspection Plan I Report #: References (see Section 7): Whitev Co. W Julv 1991 Characteristic: Process Connection Saple Size': All Ites Acceptance Criteria: 112" MNPT TO 1/2" FNPT Receipt Inspection Plan I Report #: References (see Section 7): Characteristic: Valve Body Material Saple Size*: Noral Sapling Size Acceptance Criteria: Stainless Steel Receipt Inspection Plan I Report #: References (see Section 7): Characteristic: Process Connection Material Saple Size': Noral Sapling Size Acceptance Criteria: Stainless Steel Receipt Inspection Plan I Report #: References (see Section 7):

15 Coercial Grade Ite Upgrade Dedication For ECNNo. NA CGI NO. CGI-SNF-D-13-P5-024 Title: WHITEY SCHe GAUGEIROOT VALVES SNF-3921, Rev. 4 Page 9 of I2 SECTION 4 BY SPECJAL TEST * See Attachent G of Desk Instruction for Saoline Size Test To Be Perfored by: 1 Nuber of Ites to be Tested: [ ]Purchaser [ ] Supplier/Manufacturer** Testllnspection Location: [ ]Other Characteristic for Test: Pressure Boundary Integrity SCHe-V-*064, *065, *082, and *084 Acceptance Criteria: Pressure Test at 4400 psig (No Leakage) Saple Size*: Noral Sapling Size Actual Test Value: Test Plan and Report #: References (see Section 7): Characteristic for Test: Pressure Boundary Integrity SCHe-V-'069. '070, '077. *078, '083. '085. *088, and '089 Acceptance Criteria: Pressure Test at 165 psig (No Leakage) Saple Size*: Pressure Boundary tests perfored at 4400 psig can also be used to docuent the critical characteristic pressure boundary test at 165 psig for valves in the sae lot. Actual Test Value: Test Plan and Report #: References (see Section 7): Characteristic for Test: Valve Seat Leakage Acceptance Criteria: <0.1 SCClin 4000 psig Saple Size*: Noral Sapling Size Actual Test Value: Test Plan and Report #: References (see Section 7): Characteristic for Test: Seisic Condition A Acceptance Criteria: Maintain Critical Function Before And After Seisic Event. Saple Size*: W-441-P5, Rev. 2, Appendix I, page 1-2, provides the seisic testing plan for these coponents. The seisic testing is conducted for one coplete panel with the coponents assebled on the panel and tested as a coplete assebly. The test seisically qualifies the entire assebly, including ountings, piping, and coponents. The nuber of coponents tested is dictated by the panel assebly design. Actual Test Value: Test Plan and Report #: References (see Section 7): **M SupplierlManufacturer or Other, Refer to CGI Checklist-2 far Suppofl Inforation

16 -.-- E I I * 0 i? % z C c : n * c Y - c v) v) U e e 5 F n v) 3 3 * C v) > - E! - C v) " e a e n y1 In.. r 0 2 c -

17 3

18 ~. ~ Coercial Grade Ite Upgrade Dedication For ECNNa. NA CGI No. CGI-SNF-D-13-P5-024 Tille: WHITEY SCHe GAUGEIROOT VALVES SNF-3921, Rev. 4 Page12of12 Sect.on 6 Contacts/Phone Nubers I Nae Phone I Design Authority 0 QA 0 t I QC 0 Cog - Engineer 0 CGI Engineer 0 Procureent Engineer 0 I--.( I Other 0 I Sect~on 7 SLpporting Docuentation for Inis Checklist Initial Procureent Docuents For Critical Characteristics I [ ] Drawings: I I [ ] Manuals (specify type & nuber): [ ] Design Calculations [ ] Installation Instructions [ ] Operation Instructions I [ ] Calibration Instructions I I [ ] Manufacturer s Recoended Spare Parts List [ ] Other: 1 Procureent Docuents I I ~~ [ ] Certificate of Conforance/Copliance [ 1 Seisic Qualification Certificate [ ] Environental Qualification Certificate [ ] Test Report (s): 1 [ 1 Inspection Report (s): I I [ [ CMTRs for ASME Pressure Retaining Materials 1 Valve Seat Leakage Report I I 1 Weld Records I I 6/19/00

19 To Distribution W-441, CGI Package DISTRIBUTION SHEET Fro SNF-CVD Page 1 of 1 EDTNO. NA Nae Text Attach'' EDT/ECN MSlN With All Text Only Appendix Only Attach. Only D. Whitehurst x3-74 X G. Singh x3-74 X A. Artzer (CVD Library] 1 R3-86 I x 1 I I R. Rarnsqate I x3-74 I x I I I J. Breh I R3-26 I x I I I P. Beaudet SNF Startup SNF Project Files SNF Satelite Library S8-07 X P. Morrell (AVS) I G1-50 I x I I I M. Evarts (AI) I N1-29 I x 1 I I L. Price I R3-26 I x I I I T. Nuxall C. Miska X R3-11 X X3-25 X C. Van Katwiik I R3-47 I x I I I D. Whitworth I R3-11 I x I I I x3-74 X x3-74 X A (10197)