Civil Air Patrol. Summary of Aircrew Professionalism Content. Kevin Conyers Chief, Stan/Eval Aug 2018 Anaheim, CA

Transcription

1 Civil Air Patrol Summary of Aircrew Professionalism Content Kevin Conyers Chief, Stan/Eval Aug 2018 Anaheim, CA

2 Introductions Kevin Conyers, Chief of Stan/Eval Lt Col Gene Caisse, Asst Chief of Stan/Eval Col Jack Buschmann, Glider Program Manager CAP NHQ Stan/Eval Advisors Col Mike Moyer Col Carton Sumner Lt Col Josh Shields

3 Overview Charters Methodology Recommendations Implementation Timelines Program Elements Summary

4 CFT Charters

5 Methodology 2018 CAP Pilot Survey 2018 CAP Aircrew Survey Performance Analysis CAP Mishap Analysis Benchmarking Gap Analysis Cause Analysis Intervention Selection Design and Development Evaluation

6 Performance Analysis Aircraft Accident Rates

7 Performance Analysis Aircraft Incident Rates CAP Aircraft Mishap Events by Category and Classification (FY14-18) Fiscal Year FR - Damage Rate GR - Damage Rate FY FY FY FY FY

8 Cause Analysis Human Factors (Airplane) 45 Human Factors - Action 35 Human Factors - Contributing

9 Cause Analysis FR-I/A Events Over Time (Airplane)

10 Cause Analysis FR-I/A Events by Flight Purpose Event Count The blue line is read off the right-hand axis. The data indicates that on check rides CAP experienced damage at a rate that was 3.7 times higher than the organizations average rate per flight hour flown FH(normed) Checkride Proficiency Training O-ride Maintenance SAR/DR/CD 0.0 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 Total FH(normed)

11 Intervention Selection Program Risk Management ID Hazards SIRS data Mishap Analysis Tool Assess Risk Risk tolerance Risk acceptance Risk categories DoD practices Develop Controls Organizational guidance Regulatory Procedural RAW Hazard Frequency for All Mishap Events (FY16-18) Organizational 70-1 SOP Low Med High

12 Intervention Selection Program Risk Management Civil Air Patrol Mishap Experience - Airplane (FY16-18) 263,751 hours Probability Severity Operational Hazard Type Events 1 per n hours Label (reasonable) HRI Inadequate Risk Management 11 23,977 Frequent Catastrophic 1 Willful Violation 8 32,969 Frequent Catastrophic 1 Near Mid-Air Collision 5 52,750 Frequent Catastrophic 1 Poor Landing Technique 47 5,612 Frequent Critical 3 Improper Preflight/Postflight 29 9,095 Frequent Critical 3 CP/IP Involvement 21 12,560 Frequent Critical 3 Takeoff/Launch Technique 7 37,679 Frequent Critical 3 Improper Ground Handling 35 7,536 Frequent Marginal 7 Improper Taxi 26 10,144 Frequent Marginal 7 Bird/Wildlife Strike 14 18,839 Frequent Marginal 7

13 ACP Initiatives Recommendations RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Communicate organizational expectations for aircrew professionalism X X X Y Develop and implement a Culture Change Plan X X X Revise the regulatory structure for flight operations (CAPR 70 series) X X X X Revise Organizational Design for Stan/Eval Officers and associated Specialty Track X X X Develop and publish CAPR 70-2 Flying Operations, Training X X X X X Develop and publish CAPR 70-3 Flying Operations, Standardization and Evaluation X X X X X Develop and publish CAPR 70-4 Flying Operations, Operations Procedures X X X Further develop CAP's Risk Management culture, policy, processes, and training X X Implement risk controls for Extremely High to High Risk Hazards X X Develop high-level requirements for improved infrastructure support of the program X X X X SOURCE Prior Efforts Program Risk Management Program Reviews 2018 CAP Pilot/Aicrew Surveys Deliberations Near-term opportunity?

14 Aircrew Professionalism Initiative Implementation Timeline

15 Aircrew Professionalism ABILITIES JUDGMENT SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AERONAUTICAL SKILLS ORG SUPPORT KNOWLEDGE ENVIRONMENT RISK AIRCRAFT SELF TEAM adapted from Tony Kern s Airmanship Model INDIVIDUAL DISCIPLINE COMMITMENT

16 Three Phase Approach Phase One - Individual Commitment Discipline Phase Two - Team CRM/SPRM Check Pilots & Check Rides Instructor Pilots and Instruction Phase Three - Organizational RM Policy, Processes and Training Stan/Eval Program Regulatory Structure Qualifications & Endorsements Infrastructure

17 Individual Development Commitment

18 Individual Development Discipline Self Peers Organization

19 Team Development Crew Resource Management Threat & Error Management CRM Skills Decision Making Assertiveness Mission Analysis Communication Leadership Adaptability / Flexibility Situational Awareness Case Studies

20 Team Development Check Pilots and Check Rides 2018 NCPSC Check Ride Guidance Plan of Action (template) Incomplete, failed, expired G1000, KAP140/GFC700 Standards (CAPF 91) Flight Clinics/Meetings Risk Management POC: Gene Caisse, DOVA

21 Team Development Instructors & Instruction National Instructor Pilot Standardization Course? Syllabus guidance Flight Clinics Methods for deploying issue-focused training (Short-/Soft-field) POC: Gene Caisse, DOVA

22 Organizational Development The Stan/Eval Program

23 Organizational Development Regulatory Structure CAPR 70-1 General Flying Rules CAPR 70-2 Aircrew Training CAPR 70-3 Standardization & Evaluation CAPR 70-4 Operations Procedures Notional Only

24 Organization Development Qualifications & Endorsements Document current state Identify disconnects/gaps Align policy, regulation, standards and evaluation Plan for development of required organizational support

25 Organizational Development Infrastructure Workflow Delivery Content

26 Aircrew Professionalism Initiative Implementation Timeline

27 Questions? Kevin Conyers Chief, Stan/Eval