REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
|
|
- Edgar Harmon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA THURSDAY, MARCH 22, 2018, 2:00pm-4:00pm 1105 TERMINAL WAY, SUITE 101, RENO, NV 1 ST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. The RTC Engineering Conference Room is accessible to individuals with disabilities. Requests for auxiliary aids to assist individuals with disabilities should be made with as much advance notice as possible. For those requiring hearing or speech assistance, contact Relay Nevada at (TTY, VCO or HCO); other requests should be directed to RTC Engineering at II. The Regional Road Impact Fee Technical Advisory Committee (RRIF TAC) has a standing item for accepting public comment on topics relevant to the RRIF TAC that are not included on the agenda. No action may be taken on a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter itself has been specifically included on an agenda as an item upon which action will be taken. For specific items on the RRIF TAC agenda, public comment will be taken at the time the item is discussed. Individuals providing public comment will be limited to three minutes. Individuals acting as a spokesperson for a group may request additional time. Attempts to present public input in a disruptive manner will not be allowed. Remarks will be addressed to the RRIF TAC as a whole and not to individual members. III. The RRIF TAC may combine two or more agenda items for consideration and/or may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. ITEM 1 ITEM 2 ITEM 3 ITEM 4 ITEM 5 ITEM 6 ITEM 7 ITEM 8 Approval of Agenda (For Possible Action) Public Comment - please read paragraph II near the top of this page Approval of the February 22, 2017 Meeting Minutes (For Possible Action) Thirty (30) Year Right of Way Reservation (For Possible Action) RRIF Capital Improvement Plans by Service Area (For Possible Action) RRIF Indexing 5 th Edition Year 3 (For Possible Action) Public Comment - please read paragraph II near the top of this page Member Items a) next RRIF TAC meeting: April 26, 2018 ITEM 9 Adjournment (For Possible Action) The Committee may take action on any item noted for possible action Posting locations: Washoe Co Admin Bldg, 1001 E. 9th St., Reno, NV; RTC, 1105 Terminal Way., Reno, NV; 4 th STREET STATION, 200 E. 4th St., Reno, NV; CENTENNIAL PLAZA, Victorian Square, Sparks, NV; Sparks City Hall, 431 Prater Way, Sparks, NV; Reno City Hall, 1 E. First St., Reno, NV; Incline Village General Imp. Dist., 893 Southwood Blvd., Incline Village, NV; area press & media via fax; RTC website
2 March 22, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 2 TO: Regional Road Impact Fee Technical Advisory Committee (RRIF TAC) FROM: Julie Masterpool, P.E. RRIF Program Manager SUBJECT: Public Input This agenda item allows the public the opportunity to provide information on topics within the jurisdiction of the Regional Road Impact Fee Technical Advisory Committee (RRIF TAC). Any person wishing to wait to provide public comment on a specific agenda item should indicate that item number on the comment card. The RRIF TAC reserves the right to take all public comment during Public Input. Individuals addressing the RRIF TAC during the Public Input portion of the meeting will be limited to three minutes total. However, an individual acting as a spokesperson for a group of individuals may request additional time. Individuals are expected to provide public input in a professional and constructive manner. RTC Board: Ron Smith (Chair) Bob Lucey (Vice Chair) Paul McKenzie Vaughn Hartung Neoma Jardon PO Box 30002, Reno, NV Terminal Way, Reno, NV rtcwashoe.com
3 ITEM 3 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RTC) REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (RRIF) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes Thursday, February 22, 2018 Members Present: Amy Cummings, Regional Transportation Commission Brian Stewart, Regional Transportation Commission Clara Lawson, Washoe County Public Works Janelle Thomas, City of Reno Community Development John Krmpotic, Private Sector Jim Rundle, City of Sparks Community Development Jon Ericson, City of Sparks Public Works Kraig Knudsen, Private Sector Mike Lawson, Washoe County Planning Commission Randy Walter, Private Sector Scott Carey, City of Sparks Planning Commission Steve Bunnell, City of Reno Public Works Members Absent: Mojra Hauenstein, Washoe County Development Review Peter Gower, City of Reno Planning Commission Ted Erkan, Private Sector Carl Savely Guests: Blaine Peterson RTC Staff: Julie Masterpool Lee Anne Olivas Page 1 of 4
4 The meeting was called to order at 2:08pm. Item 1: Approval of Agenda The agenda was approved unanimously. Item 2: Public Comment There was no response to the call for public comment. Item 3: Approval of the September 28, 2017 Meeting Minutes The agenda was approved by majority vote. Eleven members voted to approve the meeting minutes and Brian Stewart abstained because he did not attend the September meeting. Item 4: 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Amendment Amy Cummings discussed the project prioritization factors for the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). She explained how congestion relief needs were identified through the regional Travel Demand Model (TMD). Amy also described the amendment process and how long the amendment process can take (three to four months). Amendments can require air quality tests and a TMD update. They can also affect the Capital Improvement Plan s list of projects. Julie Masterpool noted some upcoming projects or developments that may require an RTP Amendment including NDOT s Spaghetti Bowl Project, Stonegate, 4 th Street Fountain District, Daybreak, and Sonoma Highlands. The new projects/developments could affect the Capital Improvement Plan s costs if included at this time and could delay the adoption of the 6 th Edition fee adoption. There was discussion about whether to move forward with the 6 th Edition update with the information available now and do a 7 th Edition when the projects come to fruition or to wait to see if the projects will be coming soon. There was agreement to move forward with the 6 th Edition update, but members want to keep the potential new projects in mind as we go through the update process. Julie stated the General Administrative Manual (GAM) needs the language regarding private CIP amendments updated to follow the RTP Amendment process. Page 2 of 4
5 The members discussed the need to reserve right-of-way for future use. In past editions, right-ofway needs out to the 30 year timeframe identified in the RTP was permitted. The 5 th Edition removed it because Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) only states the capacity need within 10 years. The members agreed that it would be beneficial to get legal advice on adding the long range rightof-way reserve option back in. Julie noted the right-of-way reserve will increase the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) costs and resulting impact fee rate because just reserving right-of-way would not add additional Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT s) in the RRIF fee calculation. This item will continue to be discussed at the March meeting. Item 5: RRIF Capital Improvement Plans by Service Area and Fee Methodology Julie Masterpool discussed the breakout of projects into their respective service areas. She explained the columns on the worksheets, such as, percent of the project located within the respective Service Areas and RRIF eligibility. RRIF eligibility percentages were based on whether other funding sources were anticipated to fund a project, mobility projects would be based on the percent VMT growth in the Service Area, and reduction for the 1 st 2 lanes of a new roadway. Julie noted that freeway improvements could not be paid for with impact fees, but intersections of ramps and regional roadways were eligible. She commented that some projects may come off of the CIP because they are NDOT projects or percentages may be adjusted if de-federalized. Julie asked everyone to review the worksheets and let her know if there are any questions or comments. Julie stated she is still working on finalizing the other factors used in the $/VMT calculations such as the number of new trips and trip lengths, but preliminary analysis shows that fees will increase. Based on the worksheets provided at the meeting, the North Service Area could go from $262 per VMT to $552 per VMT. The South Service Area could go from $297 per VMT to $484 per VMT. Julie passed out a handout on RRIF CIP Projects 2018 (see Attachment A). It is a map of the projects. Julie will an electronic copy to the members after the meeting. John Krmpotic left the meeting at 2:52pm. Page 3 of 4
6 There was discussion about timing the 6 th Edition update with the completion of the Consensus Forecast. Julie will check with Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency (TMRPA) to see what their timeframe for adoption of the 2018 Consensus Forecast. Item 6: RRIF Indexing 5 th Edition Year 3 Julie Masterpool discussed the 5 th Edition Year 3 indexing. She explained the indexing only requires Regional Transportation Commission s (RTC) Board approval. It does not require local agency approval, but it will require local agency permitting staff to update their permit software programs. Washoe County needs about three months lead time to implement the changes. Julie stated the indexing would increase the fees about $5.00/VMT in the North Service Area and about $5.50/VMT in the South. Randy Walter made the motion to recommend indexing the 5 th Edition RRIF fees to the RTC Board and Clara Lawson seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously. The members agreed it is easier to handle incremental increases instead of large increases at once. Also, the analysis of the CIP could take a significant amount of time. Julie stated she will plan to take the indexing item to the RTC Board in March. Item 7: Public Comment There was no response to the call for public comment. Item 8: Member Items The next RRIF TAC meeting is scheduled for March 22, 2018 at 2pm in the RTC s 1 st Floor Conference Room located at 1105 Terminal Way, Reno. Item 9: Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 3:23pm. Respectfully Submitted, Lee Anne Olivas Page 4 of 4
7 ATTACHMENT A
8 March 22, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 4 TO: Regional Road Impact Fee Technical Advisory Committee (RRIF TAC) FROM: Julie Masterpool, P.E. RRIF Program Manager SUBJECT: Thirty (30) Year Right of Way Reservation RECOMMENDATION Acknowledge receipt of information addressing the inclusion of thirty year right of way reservations as a part of the RRIF Program and provide input. SUMMARY At the February 22, 2018 meeting, members of the RRIF TAC requested further information on the possibility of including right of way costs for long range transportation projects included in the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan in the RRIF Program calculations. Staff will provide legal guidance on the matter at the meeting. RTC Board: Ron Smith (Chair) Bob Lucey (Vice Chair) Paul McKenzie Vaughn Hartung Neoma Jardon PO Box 30002, Reno, NV Terminal Way, Reno, NV rtcwashoe.com
9 March 22, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 5 TO: Regional Road Impact Fee Technical Advisory Committee (RRIF TAC) FROM: Julie Masterpool, P.E. RRIF Program Manager SUBJECT: RRIF Capital Improvement Plans for North and South Service Areas and Fee Methodology RECOMMENDATION Acknowledge receipt of information regarding the Regional Road Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plans for the North and South Service Areas; provide input. SUMMARY The RRIF Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) represents the list of capacity improvement projects anticipated over the next 10 year period. The CIP for each Service Area was established based on the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan and augmented with additional analysis using the RTC s Travel Demand Model. The proposed list of projects by Service Area is provided in Attachment A. The list of projects include the estimated cost for each project based on current dollars (2018 projections) along with the type of facility improvement (Capacity, Multimodal, ADA, Preventive Maintenance) and percent of the project which falls within the Service Area. NRS 278B also requires that impact fee calculations take into account other funding sources which may be used to construct RTP improvements. The major sources of outside funding for improvements to the regional roadway network are Federal and State highway funds. Estimated Federal and State funding over the 10-year period covered by the CIP is be based on the amount of funding currently programmed for CIP projects in the current five-year Regional Transportation Improvements Program (RTIP). Based on discussions with the RRIF TAC at the February meeting and RTC s Planning department, adjustments were made to reflect recent changes to the funding sources are various projects, i.e., 2 nd Street and Kietzke Lane projects will be NDOT funded and were given a 0% RRIF Share, Sparks Boulevard is anticipated to be locally funded and received a RRIF Share, Pyramid/US 395 widening is anticipated to be partially Federal/State funded and received a 5% RRIF Share. RTC Board: Ron Smith (Chair) Bob Lucey (Vice Chair) Paul McKenzie Vaughn Hartung Neoma Jardon PO Box 30002, Reno, NV Terminal Way, Reno, NV rtcwashoe.com
10 RRIF Capital Improvement Plans March 22, 2018 Page 2 A revised version of the CIP is presented in Attachment A. Based on the draft CIP, the capacity vs. multimodal breakdown is listed as below: North % South % Capacity $175,849,880 92% $87,457,403 80% Multimodal $16,250,010 8% $22,269,136 20% Total $192,099,890 $109,726,539 Additional adjustments to the RRIF Share are under analysis to incorporate funding from local sources, i.e., Fuel Tax and Sales Tax. Attachment A not available at the time of agenda posting; however, it will be provided prior to the meeting. Attachment
11 ATTACHMENT A Project/Program Description Description or Annual Cost Draft v2 6th Edition RRIF Capital Improvement Plan South Severice Area 2018 Inflated (3% Adj) % South Service Area % RRIF Funded RRIF Share South 2nd St Keystone Ave to I-580 Multimodal improvements Phase 1 $3,090,000 0% $0 Other Sources Notes Potential Source STIP % 0% 4th St/Prater Way Bus RAPID Transit Project Evans Ave to Pyramid Hwy RAPID Extension & Complete Street Improvements $59,534,000 55% 0% $0 Other Sources 33% ADA Accessibility Improvements ( ) ADA Accessibility Improvements ( ) Arlington Ave ( ) ADA Transition Plan $1.28 million per year $5,665,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - ADA ADA Transition Plan $1 million per year $5,665,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - ADA At Truckee River Bridge Replace existing bridges $20,600,000 0% $0 Other Sources NA - See B/P Arlington Ave ( ) At Truckee River Bridge Replace existing bridges (PE/NEPA) $515,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Replacement Arrowcreek Pkwy Wedge Pkwy to Zolezzi Ln Widen 2 to 4 lanes $6,695,000 $6,695,000 Capacity Private Center St S Virginia to I-80 Widen sidewalks & add bike lanes $5,562,000 18% $1,001,160 Multimodal Damonte Ranch Pkwy Veterans Pkwy to Rio Wrangler Pkwy New 2 lane road $7,313,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - 1st 2 lanes Private Debt Service ( ) $27.4 million per year $150,174,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Admin $ Debt Service ( ) $27.3 million per year $140,595,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Admin $ Forest St California Ave to Mount Rose St Bike facility $4,223,000 18% $760,140 Multimodal Geiger Grade Toll Rd to Rim Rock Widen 2 to 4 lanes $21,218,000 $21,218,000 Capacity J:\ENG\RRIF\RRIF Editions\6th edition\2-rrif TAC Meetings\2018\ RRIF TAC\Item 5 Attachmentv2.xlsx 1 of 8
12 ATTACHMENT A Draft v2 6th Edition RRIF Capital Improvement Plan South Severice Area Project/Program Description Description or Annual Cost Geiger Grade Realignment 2018 Inflated (3% Adj) % South Service Area % RRIF Funded RRIF Share South Notes Potential Source S Virginia St to Toll Rd New 4 lane road $65,920,000 50% $32,960,000 Partial Capacity STIP % Glendale Ave Kietzke Ave to McCarran Blvd Pavement reconstruction & multimodal improvements $16,892,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Maintenance Federal/State 0% Keystone Ave California Ave to I-80 Multimodal improvements and Truckee River bridge replacement $51,500,000 18% $9,270,000 Multimodal Federal/State Kietzke Ln ( ) Virginia St to Galletti Way Multimodal improvements Phase 1 $3,914,000 0% $0 Other Sources Kietzke Ln ( ) Virginia St to Galletti Way Multimodal improvements Phase 2 $8,652,000 0% $0 Other Sources 0% Mill St/Terminal Way ( ) Mill St/Terminal Way ( ) Pavement Preservation ( ) Reno-Tahoe International Airport to Lake St (downtown Reno) Reno Tahoe International Airport to Lake St (downtown Reno) Multimodal improvements, intersection improvements, additional eastbound lane from Kietzke Ln to US 395, PE/NEPA Multimodal improvements, intersection improvements, additional eastbound lane from $1,648,000 18% $296,640 Multimodal Federal/ 92% $14,136,750 18% $2,544,615 Multimodal Federal/ Kietzke Ln to US 395, PE/NEPA Systemwide $23.8 million per year $122,570,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Maintenance Pavement Preservation ( ) Systemwide $18.7 million per year $104,236,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Maintenance Pedestrian & Bicycle Facility Improvements ( ) Pedestrian & Bicycle Facility Improvements Spot improvements systemwide based on Bike/Ped Master Plan Spot improvements systemwide based on $1 million per year $5,665,000 50% 18% $509,850 Multimodal $1.28 million per year $5,665,000 50% 18% $509,850 Multimodal ( ) Bike/Ped Master Plan Plumb Ln Lakeside Dr to Kietzke Ln Sidewalks and bike lanes $6,592,000 18% $1,186,560 Multimodal J:\ENG\RRIF\RRIF Editions\6th edition\2-rrif TAC Meetings\2018\ RRIF TAC\Item 5 Attachmentv2.xlsx 2 of 8
13 ATTACHMENT A Draft v2 6th Edition RRIF Capital Improvement Plan South Severice Area Project/Program Description Description or Annual Cost Ramp Improvements ( ) 2018 Inflated (3% Adj) % South Service Area % RRIF Funded RRIF Share South Notes Potential Source TBD - (5 ramps) $51,500,000 50% 50% $12,875,000 Capacity Sierra St California Ave to 9th St Widen sidewalks & add bike lanes $4,532,000 91% 18% $742,342 Multimodal STIP % NA - Included in Fwy Sierra St At Truckee River Bridge Replace existing bridge $15,450,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Bridge South Virginia St E Patriot Blvd to Mt. Rose Hwy/Geiger Grade Add sidewalks and bike lane, convert travel lane to bus/bike lane $14,564,200 18% $2,621,556 Multimodal SouthEast Connector S Meadows Pkwy to Greg St New 6 lane road (under construction) $133,900,000 0% $0 Other Sources Sparks Blvd ( ) Greg to Baring Multimodal improvements, widen 4 to 6 lanes from Greg to I-80, widen 4-6 lanes I-80 to Springland on the east side PE/NEPA Sparks Blvd ( ) Greg to Baring Multimodal improvements, widen 4 to 6 lanes from Greg to I-80, widen 4-6 lanes I-80 to Springland on the Traffic Signals, ITS Operations & Intersections ( ) Traffic Signals, ITS Operations & $1,648,000 18% $296,640 Capacity $45,469,350 18% $8,184,483 Capacity east side Systemwide $3.32 million per year $14,523,000 50% 36% $2,614,140 Capacity Systemwide $2.6 million per year $14,523,000 50% 36% $2,614,140 Capacity Intersections ( ) Vassar St Holcomb Ave to Terminal Way Bike lanes $4,429,000 18% $797,220 Multimodal 5% 62% Vine St Riverside Dr to University Terrace Bike lanes $3,296,000 85% 18% $504,288 Multimodal Virginia St Bus RAPID Extension Plumb Ln to 17th St Pedestrian improvements & pavement reconstruction $80,134,000 68% 0% $0 Other Sources 33% J:\ENG\RRIF\RRIF Editions\6th edition\2-rrif TAC Meetings\2018\ RRIF TAC\Item 5 Attachmentv2.xlsx 3 of 8
14 ATTACHMENT A Draft v2 6th Edition RRIF Capital Improvement Plan South Severice Area Project/Program Description Description or Annual Cost W 2nd St (Reno) Keystone Ave to Galletti Way Enhanced sidewalks, landscaping, bike lanes 2018 Inflated (3% Adj) % South Service Area % RRIF Funded RRIF Share South Notes Potential Source $8,471,750 18% $1,524,915 Multimodal /State STIP % Total $109,726,539 J:\ENG\RRIF\RRIF Editions\6th edition\2-rrif TAC Meetings\2018\ RRIF TAC\Item 5 Attachmentv2.xlsx 4 of 8
15 ATTACHMENT A Draft v2 6th Edition RRIF Capital Improvement Plan North Service Area Project/Program Description Description or Annual Cost 4th St/Prater Way Bus RAPID Transit Project Evans Ave to Pyramid Hwy RAPID Extension & Complete Street Improvements 2018 Inflated (3% Adj) % North Service Area % RRIF Funded RRIF Share North Notes $59,534,000 45% 0% $0 Other Sources Potential Source STIP % 33% ADA Accessibility Improvements ( ) ADA Accessibility Improvements (2017- ADA Transition Plan $1.28 million per year $5,665,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - ADA ADA Transition Plan $1 million per year $5,665,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - ADA 2021) Buck Dr Lemmon Dr to N Hills Blvd Widen 2 to 4 lanes $1,339,000 $1,339,000 Capacity NA - See B/P Debt Service ( ) $27.4 million per year $150,174,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Admin $ Debt Service ( ) $27.3 million per year $140,595,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Admin $ Dolores Dr Existing Dolores west to Lazy 5 Pkwy New 2 lane road $1,545,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - 1st 2 lanes Private NA - Private Kiley Pkwy Wingfield Hills Rd to Henry Orr Pkwy New 2 lane road $6,592,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - 1st 2 lanes Private NA - Private Lazy 5 Pkwy ( ) West Sun Valley Arterial to Pyramid Hwy New 2 lane road $18,952,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - 1st 2 lanes Private NA - Private Lazy 5 Pkwy ( ) West Sun Valley Arterial to Pyramid Hwy Widen from 2 to 4 lanes $11,845,000 $11,845,000 Capacity Private May delete Lemmon Dr ( ) US 395 to Military Rd and Fleetwood Dr to Arkansas St Lemmon Dr ( ) US 395 to Military Rd and Fleetwood Dr to Arkansas St Loop Rd Salomon Circle to Eastern Slope Rd Widen 4 to 6 lanes from US 395 to Military Rd and Widen 2 to 4 lanes from Fleetwood Dr to Arkansas St Widen 4 to 6 lanes from US 395 to Military Rd and Widen 2 to 4 lanes $3,090,000 $3,090,000 Capacity $9,888,000 $9,888,000 Capacity from Fleetwood Dr to Arkansas St New 2 lane road $3,914,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - 1st 2 lanes Private J:\ENG\RRIF\RRIF Editions\6th edition\2-rrif TAC Meetings\2018\ RRIF TAC\Item 5 Attachmentv2.xlsx 5 of 8
16 ATTACHMENT A Draft v2 6th Edition RRIF Capital Improvement Plan North Service Area Project/Program Description Description or Annual Cost 2018 Inflated (3% Adj) % North Service Area % RRIF Funded RRIF Share North Notes Potential Source Military Rd Lemmon Dr to Echo Ave Widen 2 to 4 lanes $18,231,000 $18,231,000 Capacity STIP % Moya Blvd Red Rock Rd to Echo Ave Widen 2 to 4 lanes $14,111,000 $14,111,000 Capacity N/S Connector Rd Stonebrook Pkwy to Wingfield Hills Rd New 2 lane road $6,798,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - 1st 2 lanes Private North Virginia St Stead Blvd to McCarran Blvd Sidewalks and bike lanes. An offstreet shared-use path may be considered $22,675,450 14% $3,174,563 Multimodal Oddie Blvd/Wells Ave I-80 to Pyramid Way Multimodal improvements $38,728,000 14% $5,421,920 Multimodal Federal/ 5% Parr Blvd Ferrari McLeod to Raggio Pkwy Interchange improvements $6,180,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Maintenance Pavement Preservation ( ) Pavement Preservation ( ) Systemwide $23.8 million per year $122,570,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Maintenance Systemwide $18.7 million per year $104,236,000 50% 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - Maintenance Pedestrian & Bicycle Facility Improvements ( ) Pedestrian & Bicycle Facility Improvements Spot improvements systemwide based on Bike/Ped Master Plan Spot improvements systemwide based on ( ) Bike/Ped Master Plan Pyramid McCarran Blvd Improve capacity, safety & multimodal access (Project Complete) Pyramid Hwy/US 395 Queen Way to Golden View Connector Phase 1 ( ) Pyramid Hwy/US 395 Queen Way to Golden View Connector Phase 1 ( ) $1 million per year $5,665,000 50% 14% $396,550 Multimodal $1.28 million per year $5,665,000 50% 14% $396,550 Multimodal Widen Pyramid to 6 lanes from Queen Way to Golden View Widen Pyramid to 6 lanes from Queen Way to Golden View (PE/NEPA) $30,900,000 0% $0 Other Sources $52,015,000 5% $2,600,750 Capacity $5,150,000 5% $257,500 Capacity NA - Previous J:\ENG\RRIF\RRIF Editions\6th edition\2-rrif TAC Meetings\2018\ RRIF TAC\Item 5 Attachmentv2.xlsx 6 of 8
17 ATTACHMENT A Draft v2 6th Edition RRIF Capital Improvement Plan North Service Area Project/Program Description Description or Annual Cost Ramp Improvements ( ) Red Rock Rd 2018 Inflated (3% Adj) % North Service Area % RRIF Funded RRIF Share North Notes Potential Source TBD - (5 ramps) $51,500,000 50% 50% $12,875,000 Capacity Moya Blvd to Evans Ranch Access Widen 2 to 4 lanes $41,921,000 $41,921,000 Capacity Sierra St California Ave to 9th St Widen sidewalks & add bike lanes $4,532,000 9% 14% $59,208 Multimodal STIP % NA - Included in Fwy Sky Vista Pkwy Lemmon Dr to Silver Lake Rd Widen 2 to 4 lanes $7,107,000 $7,107,000 Capacity Sparks Blvd ( ) Greg to Baring Multimodal improvements, widen 4 to 6 lanes from Greg to I-80, widen 4-6 lanes I-80 to Springland on the east side PE/NEPA Sparks Blvd ( ) Greg to Baring Multimodal improvements, widen 4 to 6 lanes from Greg to I-80, widen 4-6 lanes I-80 to Springland on the Stonebrook Pkwy ( ) N/S Connector Rd to Pyramid Highway $1,648,000 82% $1,350,140 Capacity $45,469,350 82% $37,251,210 Capacity east side New 2 lane road $8,343,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - 1st 2 lanes Private Stonebrook Pkwy ( ) La Posada Dr to N/S Connector Rd New 2 lane road $11,639,000 0% $0 Non-RRIF Eligible - 1st 2 lanes Private NA - Private Sun Valley Blvd ( ) 7th Ave to Pyramid Hwy/US 395 Connector Multimodal improvements PE/NEPA $3,090,000 14% $432,600 Multimodal Federal/ 86% 5% Sun Valley Blvd ( ) 7th Ave to Pyramid Hwy/US 395 Connector Multimodal improvements Construction $42,611,100 14% $5,965,554 Multimodal Federal/ Traffic Signals, ITS Operations & Intersections ( ) Traffic Signals, ITS Operations & Intersections ( ) Systemwide $3.32 million per year $14,523,000 50% 36% $2,614,140 Capacity Systemwide $2.6 million per year $14,523,000 50% 36% $2,614,140 Capacity 62% J:\ENG\RRIF\RRIF Editions\6th edition\2-rrif TAC Meetings\2018\ RRIF TAC\Item 5 Attachmentv2.xlsx 7 of 8
18 ATTACHMENT A Project/Program Description Description or Annual Cost Draft v2 6th Edition RRIF Capital Improvement Plan North Service Area 2018 Inflated (3% Adj) % North Service Area % RRIF Funded RRIF Share North Notes Potential Source Victorian Ave 16th St to Pyramid Way Bike lanes $2,369,000 14% $331,660 Multimodal STIP % Vine St Riverside Dr to University Terrace Bike lanes $3,296,000 15% 14% $71,405 Multimodal Virginia St Bus RAPID Extension Plumb Ln to 17th St Pedestrian improvements & pavement reconstruction $80,134,000 32% 0% $0 Other Sources 33% Whitelake Pkwy Wingfield Hills Rd Between US 395 ramp terminals Existing Wingfield Hills Rd west to David Allen Pkwy Widen 2 to 4 lanes $6,180,000 $6,180,000 Capacity Private New 4 lane road $5,150,000 50% $2,575,000 Partial Capacity Private NA - Private Total $192,099,890 J:\ENG\RRIF\RRIF Editions\6th edition\2-rrif TAC Meetings\2018\ RRIF TAC\Item 5 Attachmentv2.xlsx 8 of 8
19 March 22, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 6 TO: Regional Road Impact Fee Technical Advisory Committee (RRIF TAC) FROM: Julie Masterpool, P.E. RRIF Program Manager SUBJECT: Regional Road Impact Fee (RRIF) Indexing 5 th Edition Year 3 RECOMMENDATION Acknowledge receipt of an update on the 5 th Edition RRIF Year 3 Indexing. SUMMARY The RTC Board was scheduled to hear an update on the 5 th Edition RRIF Year 3 Indexing at the March 16, 2018, Board meeting, but the meeting was canceled due to weather. The update will be presented at the April 20, 2018, Board meeting. Staff will provide an update on the RTC Board s recommendation at the next meeting. Attachments RTC Board: Ron Smith (Chair) Bob Lucey (Vice Chair) Paul McKenzie Vaughn Hartung Neoma Jardon PO Box 30002, Reno, NV Terminal Way, Reno, NV rtcwashoe.com
20 Attachment A Regional Road Impact Fee Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers Not Seasonally Adjusted Area: West Urban Item: All items Base Period: =100 Years: Year Annual CPI West Urban Percent Change % % % % 5 Year Rolling Average % 1.86% Source: US Department of Labor Bureau of Statistics Regional Road Impact Fee Rates 5 th Edition RRIF Year 3 Indexing Edition North South 5th Edition - Year 2 $ $ th Edition - Year 3 $ $ Difference $4.89 $5.53 Example Single Family Residential Land Use - SFR North South VMTs/DU VMTs VMTs 5th Edition - Year 2 $3, $4, th Edition - Year 3 $3, $4, Difference $73.01 $81.12
21 REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE (Year 3 Indexing) Land Use North Service Area ($267.58/VMT) South Service Area ($303.11/VMT) Residential Unit VMT 1 Cost Per Unit 2 VMT 1 Unit 2 Cost Per Single-Family Dwelling $3, $4, Multi-Family Dwelling 9.70 $2, $2, Industrial General Light Industrial 1,000 GFA 7.30 $1, $2, Attachment B Regional Road Impact Fee (RRIF) DRAFT Manufacturing 1,000 GFA 4.00 $1, $1, Warehouse 1,000 GFA 3.73 $ $1, Mini-Warehouse 1,000 GFA 2.62 $ $ Commercial/Retail Commercial/Retail 1,000 GFA $7, $7, Eating/Drinking Places 1,000 GFA $7, $7, Casino/Gaming 1,000 GFA $12, $14, Office and Other Services Schools 1,000 GFA $2, $3, th Edition Year 3 Indexing An informational brochure brought to you by the Day Care 1,000 GFA $2, $3, Lodging Room 5.90 $1, $1, Hospital 1,000 GFA $3, $4, Nursing Home 1,000 GFA 7.96 $2, $2, Medical Office 1,000 GFA $10, $11, Office and Other Services 1,000 GFA $3, $3, Regional Recreational Facility Acre 2.39 $ $ VMT/Unit 2 Cost per Unit is approximate due to rounding; the Actual Fee is $/VMT x VMT/Unit x # of Units
22 March 22, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 7 TO: Regional Road Impact Fee Technical Advisory Committee (RRIF TAC) FROM: Julie Masterpool, P.E. RRIF Program Manager SUBJECT: Public Input This agenda item allows the public the opportunity to provide information on topics within the jurisdiction of the Regional Road Impact Fee Technical Advisory Committee (RRIF TAC). Any person wishing to wait to provide public comment on a specific agenda item should indicate that item number on the comment card. The RRIF TAC reserves the right to take all public comment during Public Input. Individuals addressing the RRIF TAC during the Public Input portion of the meeting will be limited to three minutes total. However, an individual acting as a spokesperson for a group of individuals may request additional time. Individuals are expected to provide public input in a professional and constructive manner. RTC Board: Ron Smith (Chair) Bob Lucey (Vice Chair) Paul McKenzie Vaughn Hartung Neoma Jardon PO Box 30002, Reno, NV Terminal Way, Reno, NV rtcwashoe.com
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2018, 2:00pm-4:00pm 1105 TERMINAL WAY, SUITE 101, RENO, NV 1 ST FLOOR CONFERENCE
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RTC) REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (RRIF) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Meeting Minutes Thursday, November 29, 2018
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RTC) REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (RRIF) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes Thursday, November 29, 2018 Members Present: Amy Cummings, Regional Transportation
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGIONAL ROAD IMPACT FEE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Thursday, September 28, 2017, 2:00pm-4:00pm 1105 TERMINAL WAY, RENO, NV 1 ST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
More information2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN APPENDIX A Complete Streets Projects 157] 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Appendix A: Complete Streets Project Listing The roadway projects in the 2040 RTP are presented
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes. Wednesday, August 01, Attendees. Draft
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes Wednesday, August 01, 2018 Attendees Yann Ling-Barnes Joe Spencer Jae Pullen Janelle Thomas Steve Bunnell, Chair Kelly Mullin,
More informationTransportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011
Transportation in Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011 RTC OF WASHOE COUNTY Metropolitan Planning Organization Meet long term needs Deliver federal funding Program projects in
More informationUpcoming Planning Department Initiatives
Upcoming Planning Department Initiatives Center & Sierra Street bike facility alternatives Washoe County Lands Bill requests Upcoming UPWP studies Safety initiatives Transit messaging Bicycle Programs
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITIZENS MULTIMODAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITIZENS MULTIMODAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 5:30 pm Regional Transportation Commission 1 st Floor Conference Room 1105 Terminal Way,
More informationBasalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations
Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations Introduction The Basalt Creek transportation planning effort analyzed future transportation conditions and evaluated alternative strategies for
More informationVirginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Project. Environmental Assessment (EA) Presentation Public Hearing June 22, 2017
Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Project Environmental Assessment (EA) Presentation Public Hearing June 22, 2017 Presentation to RTC July 17, 2015 Presentation Overview Project Timeline Environmental
More informationTRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010
TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS April 6, 2010 Roles of Transportation Providers Context and Policy Makers Division of Transportation and Traffic Other City Operations Other Transportation Operators CMA
More informationCITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 16, 2014 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: consent old business new business public hearing information admin.
More informationNevada s Transportation Infrastructure and Future Transportation Needs
Nevada s Transportation Infrastructure and Future Transportation Needs Susan Martinovich, P.E. Director Interim Legislative Committee on Transportation Nov. 13, 2007 State Transportation Board of Directors
More informationKeep Placer Moving. Placer is Growing. POPULATION (From 2014 to 2045) 70,000 new homes and well over 180,000 more residents
Keep Placer Moving Placer is Growing Keep Placer Moving POPULATION (From 2014 to 2045) 70,000 new homes and well over 180,000 more residents 30% of the total housing market growth in the Sacramento region.
More information4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 4.9.1 INTRODUCTION The following section addresses the Proposed Project s impact on transportation and traffic based on the Traffic Study
More informationDRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN
DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL
More informationI-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)
I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS) Metro Streets and Freeways Subcommittee March 21, 2019 Gary Hamrick Cambridge Systematics, Inc. I-105 CSS Project History & Background Funded by Caltrans Sustainable
More informationAPPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD INTERSECTION NEEDS AT SR 7 and OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SR 7 Extension Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From Okeechobee Boulevard (SR
More informationCorridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011
Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10 July 27, 2011 1 Agenda Recap CAG/TF #9 Public Meeting #2 Summary Single Mode Alternatives Evaluation Results Next Steps 2 3 CAG/TF #9 Recap CAG /TF #9
More informationIMPROVING SAFETY PLANNING FOR SAFETY
3 IMPROVING SAFETY Planning and building a safe multi-modal transportation system for the travelling public is the most critical goal of the RTC. Safety is involved in all types of transportation: driving,
More informationAPPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY
STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: September 13, 2016 TO: FROM: City Council Bob Brown, Community Development Director Russ Thompson, Public Works Director Patrick Filipelli, Management Analyst 922 Machin Avenue
More informationBicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies
Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies Mobilizing 5 This chapter outlines the overarching goals, action statements, and action items Long Beach will take in order to achieve its vision of
More informationANNUAL VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AVMT AVMT AVMT AVMT AVMT AVMT AVMT ANNUAL VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL In Cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Nevada Division
More informationKIETZKE LANE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT August, 2013 Submitted By: Parsons. Submitted to:
KIETZKE LANE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL REPORT August, 2013 Submitted By: Parsons Submitted to: KIETZKE LANE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) has
More informationMCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx
MCTC 8 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV.xlsx Madera County Transportation Commission Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy Multi-Modal Project
More informationBuilt Environment Childhood Obesity Forum September 15, 2010
Built Environment Childhood Obesity Forum September 15, 2010 TITLE Why do we have cities? Boston MA To minimize travel & maximize exchange (bring people closer together) How have we built our urban roadway
More informationVDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment. Staff Recommendations
VDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment Staff Recommendations Department of Environmental Services Transportation January 28, 2017 Timeline of Transform66 June 2012: I-66
More informationMOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN I 9.1 INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.
CHAPTER NINE: TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9.1 9.2 ASSUMPTIONS 9.1 9.3 TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 9.1 9.4 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PHASING 9.3 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES Figure
More informationRESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY WHEREAS, safe, convenient, and accessible transportation for all users is a priority of the City of Neptune
More informationLynchburg District Update
Lynchburg District Update Virginia Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Spring Meeting May 16 th, 2017 David Cook Transportation Planner, VDOT Lynchburg District Table of Contents Active
More informationNon-Motorized Transportation 7-1
Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1 Transportation facilities no longer mean just accommodating a vehicle powered by a combustion engine. Pedestrian and non-motorized facilities are important modes of travel
More informationStreet Paving and Sidewalk Policy
City Commission Policy 600 Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy DEPARTMENT: Public Works DATE ADOPTED: June 7, 1995 DATE OF LAST REVISION: December 10, 2014 Policy No. 600.01 AUTHORITY: PASS City of Tallahassee-Leon
More informationWashington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing
Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing November 5, 2015 Renée Hamilton, VDOT, Deputy District Administrator I-66 Outside the Beltway Improvement Area Project Location Virginia 2 Purpose and Need
More informationSUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS
Santa Cruz County 2016 Measure D: Transportation Improvement Expenditure Plan - Approved by over 2/3 of Santa Cruz County voters on November 8, 2016 - Overview Measure D, the 2016 Transportation Improvement
More informationSan Tomas Expressway
Implementation Plan San Tomas Expressway Roads and Airports Department August 19, 2003 Implementation Plan San Tomas Expressway County of Santa Clara Roads and Airports Department 101 Skyport Drive San
More informationChapter 4: Funding and Implementation
Chapter 4: Funding and Implementation 83 84 Cost Estimating Cost estimating is an iterative process. When a project is in the conceptual stage, preliminary cost estimates are also provided conceptually,
More informationFY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices
FY 2017-2026 Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices November 1, 2017 Forecasted Growth Arlington continues to grow with a shift towards multi-family
More informationARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY
ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
More informationComplete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,
More informationMEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA
MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Monday, April 25, 2016 5:30 p.m., Regular Meeting PERMIT CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM 1950 Parkside Drive,
More informationSTAKEHOLDER MEETING STANFORD RANCH ROAD/GALLERIA BOULEVARD/SR 65 NORTHBOUND RAMPS PROJECT APPROVAL & ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (PA&ED) PHASE
STAKEHOLDER MEETING STANFORD RANCH ROAD/GALLERIA BOULEVARD/ SR 65 NORTHBOUND RAMPS PROJECT APPROVAL & ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (PA&ED) PHASE January 12, 2016 Welcome and Introductions Meeting Goals I 80/SR
More informationSR-203 Sidewalks and Town-Wide Mobility Improvements. Town Council Presentation September 7, 2016
SR-203 Sidewalks and Town-Wide Mobility Improvements Town Council Presentation September 7, 2016 SR-203 Sidewalks and Town- Wide Mobility Improvements SR-203 Sidewalks and Appurtenances Town-Wide Mobility
More informationLyons Avenue/Dockweiler Road Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. Appendix I Traffic Impact Study
Lyons Avenue/Dockweiler Road Extension Project Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendix I Traffic Impact Study Street 0 80-1947 500.4501 RITA ld Court 0 91355-1096 400.7401 LA n Avenue 0 590-3745 300-9301
More informationAnn Arbor Downtown Street Plan
1 Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan Public Workshop #1 We know that. 2 Public right-of-way (streets, sidewalks, and alleys) make up 30% of the total District area of downtown. Streets need to provide mobility
More informationAMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN LEON COUNTY FOR CURB RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 1 P age
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN FOR CURB RAMPS AND SIDEWALKS 2015 LEON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 P age INTRODUCTION The goal of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition
More informationJONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY
JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY Craighead County May 2007 JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY Craighead County May 2007 Prepared by Planning and Research Division Arkansas State
More informationDES MOINES AREA MPO. Presentation to Iowa Commercial Real Estate Association. April 6, 2017
DES MOINES AREA MPO Presentation to Iowa Commercial Real Estate Association April 6, 2017 Presentation Outline MPO Overview Trends We re Watching Plans, Projects, Initiatives, Regional Transportation Priorities
More informationAPPENDIX D: SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES
1 County County County County 2 Yolo Arterial Roadway Collector Roadway Urban Residential Street Rural Residential Roadway I-80 / U.S. 50 Bus/Carpool Lanes in both directions Richards Blvd PM Yol 80 0.237
More informationEXISTING PRIORITIES FUNDED FOR CONSTRUCTION LRTP
EXISTING PRIORITIES FUNDED FOR CONSTRUCTION Limits Description Status 1 415489 3 H1865 US HWY 301 FROM SR 674 TO BALM RD Widen 2 lanes to 6 lanes divided County / Construction Programmed 2016 2 405492
More informationNew Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007
New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007 City Street and County Road Maintenance Program The preservation and keeping of public street and road rights-of-way
More informationMichael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office
P139 STAFF REPORT f CITY NL- NAGER' S OFFICE RANCHO Date: C;UCAMONGA To: From: Subject: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's
More information!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Metro!Denver!MTD!Governance!Committee! October!23,!2013!!9:00!AM!to!10:00!AM! Denver!Regional!Council!of!Governments!
MetroDenverMTDGovernanceCommittee October23,2013 9:00AMto10:00AM DenverRegionalCouncilofGovernments MeetingRecord MetroDenverMTDGovernanceCommittee October23,2013 9:00AM Agenda: 9:00AM Welcome&Introductions
More informationCity of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY
A1 Roadway Resurfacing $23,846,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Roadway resurfacing A2 Signal Replacement $6,000,000 TYPE: Preservation of existing system Replace traffic signals. B1 W 6th St
More informationOverview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?
Overview Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation Aren Kriks, P.E. District One Bicycle Coordinator and Bureau of Programming Project Engineer History of Complete Streets IDOT Policy
More informationInstitute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017
Institute for Real Estate Management Chapter (IREM) 77 VDOT Northern Virginia Megaprojects September 13, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation Northern Virginia
More informationCounty of Fairfax, Virginia. Department of Transportation
Fairfax County Parkway History 2 Planning began 50 years ago 1960s Washington s Regional Transportation Plan Recommends improved north/south travel Construct Capital Beltway and outer beltway Outer beltway
More informationExhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA
Chapter 6 - TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA 6.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 6.1.1. Purpose: The purpose of this document is to outline a standard format for preparing a traffic impact study in the City of Steamboat
More informationMemorandum. Purpose: To update the MPO CTAC on the status of the LRTP scenario evaluation process.
Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization POB 1505, 401 E. Water St, Charlottesville, VA 22902 www.tjpdc.org (434) 979-7310 phone info@tjpdc.org email Memorandum To: MPO CTAC From: Wood
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 15, 2016 DATE: October 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Adoption of amendments to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) to create a new Pedestrian
More informationRoute 29 Solutions Projects
Route 29 Solutions Route 29 Solutions Projects www.route29solutions.org October 10, 2014 Route 29 Widening to Six Lanes Albemarle County This project will widen a 1.8-mile segment of Route 29 from four
More informationDraft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013
Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET Community Meeting May 22, 2013 Agenda Presentation Ira Brown New Mobility Paradigm Movement of People Implementation Q&A Ira Brown and Dave Roseman Small Group Discussion at Each
More informationTRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY
TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY ROADWAY SYSTEM There are approximately 40 miles of roadways in Manitou Springs. For planning purposes, roadways are typically assigned a functional classification which defines
More informationKEARNY MESA COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE
KEARNY MESA COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE January 18, 2018 SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING Mobility Concepts and Urban Design Presentation Outline Mobility Concepts: Multimodal Planning Toolbox Presentation and Activities
More informationExecutive Summary June 2015
Executive Summary June 2015 Highway 112 Corridor Study Benton and Washington Counties Executive Summary June 2015 Prepared by Transportation Planning and Policy Division Arkansas State Highway and Transportation
More informationBICYCLE AND TRAILS ADVISORY COMMISSION Meeting Minutes
BICYCLE AND TRAILS ADVISORY COMMISSION Meeting Minutes February 9, 2017 The Bicycle and Trails Advisory Commission was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Chair Hasser in the City Hall Committee Room, located
More informationHighway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report
Highway 217 Corridor Study Phase I Overview Report November 3, 24 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Study purpose The Highway 217 Corridor Study is developing multi-modal transportation solutions for traffic problems
More informationTRASBURG RANSPORTATION
TRASBURG RANSPORTATION LAN DEVELOPED BY THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DIVISION OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
More informationRoadway Project Recommendations:
Northwest RTPO Regional Transportation Improvement Program Recommendations (RTIPR) for NMDOT District 6 (Cibola, McKinley) & District 5 (San Juan) 2018-2023 for 5 Year STIP (FY 2018 through FY 2023) way
More informationAmendment to the Summary of Regional Strategic Investments included in the Regional Transportation Plan
Attachment A Amendment to the Summary of Regional Strategic Investments included in the Regional Transportation Plan Street and Highway improvements Project costs include all funded phases including planning,
More information2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft
2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Summary of Draft Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning Organization The George Washington Region includes the City of Fredericksburg and the counties of Caroline,
More informationPortland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements
Portland International Airport Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (October 2003) Staff Acknowledgements Scott King, Senior Aviation Planner Jason Gately, Senior Aviation Planner Preston Beck, Associate Planner
More informationProject Description Form 6V
Project Description Form 6V Basic Project Information Submitting Jurisdiction/Agency: Prince William County Project Title: Route 15 Widening: Route 55 to south of RR tracks & Construct RR Overpass Project
More informationRoute 7 Corridor Study
Route 7 Corridor Study Executive Summary Study Area The following report analyzes a segment of the Virginia State Route 7 corridor. The corridor study area, spanning over 5 miles in length, is a multi
More informationLiving Streets Policy
Living Streets Policy Introduction Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create
More informationMEMORANDUM - CITY OF PASADENA Department Of Transportation DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2008 TO: ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMISSION FROM: ~ FRED C. DOCK, DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION SUBJECT: UPDATE ON DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationDiamond Springs Parkway Project
Diamond Springs Parkway Project Public Information Meeting, Monday, March 18, 2013 330 Fair Lane, Building A, Placerville County Board of Supervisors Meeting Room, 6:30 8:00 p.m. PRESENTED BY: County of
More informationFoothill Expressway Improvements Between El Monte and San Antonio
Foothill Expressway Improvements Between El Monte and San Antonio June 29, 2017 - Los Altos Community Meeting Introduction Project Background Agenda Visit Stations: Provide Input and Ask Questions Reconvene:
More informationAppendix 3.2 D. Ridership Errata Sheet
Appendix 3.2 D Ridership Errata Sheet January 14, 2010 Since the release of the Alternatives Description for the South Coast Rail project, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation has identified
More informationEnvironmental Assessment Findings & Recommendations. Public Hearing November 13, 2014
Environmental Assessment Findings & Recommendations Public Hearing November 13, 2014 Welcome! Welcome and Introductions Project and Environmental Assessment Overview Public Comments Adjourn Purpose of
More informationAnne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES
Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary 3 II. When Is A Bicycle Pedestrian Transit Assessment (BPTA) Required? 4 III.
More informationPublic Information Meeting
Richmond Highway (U.S. Route 1) Corridor Improvements Public Information Meeting Tuesday, April 18, 2017 Mount Vernon High School 8515 Old Mt. Vernon Road, Alexandria, VA 22309 Amanda Baxter, VDOT, Special
More informationExecutive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan
Route Corridor Master Plan Project Overview The Route Corridor Master Plan is a coordinated multimodal transportation and land use plan for the entire stretch of Route through East Whiteland Township,
More information2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle and Safe Routes to School Application for Funding Page 1 of 31
2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle and Safe Routes to School Application for Funding Page 1 of 31 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle and Safe Routes to School Application for Funding Part 1: General Information Funding
More informationDULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director
DULLES AREA TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION (DATA) February 18, 2015 Susan Shaw, P.E., VDOT, Megaprojects Director I-66 Corridor Conditions Steady population growth Employment growth in activity centers Congestion
More informationMEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA
MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Monday, June 22, 2015 5:30 p.m., Regular Meeting PERMIT CENTER CONFERENCE ROOM 1950 Parkside Drive,
More information4APNOIPF Vh, YII PTC CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. 8K TH 63 River Crossing Bridge Replacement Project
City of RE 4APNOIPF Vh, X` W\ YII PTC ING, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Council Meeting Date: September 26, 2016 To: From: Agenda Item: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Ron Rosenthal, Engineering
More informationconnections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan amendment 2
connections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan amendment 2 developed by the waco metropolitan planning organization in cooperation with the following agencies: Adopted December 14, 2017 amendment
More informationAGENDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP) CYCLE 4 MPO COMPONENT FOR ACTION
VENTURA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) City of Camarillo Administrative Conference Room 601 Carmen Road, Camarillo, CA Thursday, January 17, 2019 9:00
More information3.0 Future Conditions
3.0 Future Conditions In order to be able to recommend appropriate improvements to the transportation system of the Town, it is important to first understand the nature and volume of traffic that is expected
More information3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The following section of the Draft EIR contains a description of the proposed Elk Grove Boulevard/SR 99 Interchange Modification project, consistent with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15124.
More informationSTREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN
STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN Introduction The street and highway system in the Winston-Salem Urban Area consists of thousands of miles of traffic carrying facilities, ranging from short local residential streets
More informationCity of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List. Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016
1 City of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016 2 SB 369 - MARTA Sales tax for up to 0.50% is allowed in the City of Atlanta for MARTA Purpose
More informationSolana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)
Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS) 3.0 Goals & Policies The Solana Beach CATS goals and objectives outlined below were largely drawn from the Solana Beach Circulation Element
More informationWest Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road
West Dimond Blvd Jodhpur St to Sand Lake CSS Transportation Project Summary Municipality of Anchorage Project # 05 005 Project Manager: John Smith, P.E. (MOA PM&E) Project Administrator: Julie Makela,
More informationRegional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin
Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin #118274 May 24, 2006 1 Introduction The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) is the official areawide planning agency
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary
Executive Summary Background... ES-1 Pedestrian Network... ES-2 Bikeway Network... ES-2 Collision History... ES-2 Public Input... ES-4 Conclusions and Recommendations... ES-4 1. Introduction and Setting
More informationTerwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan
Terwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan Anthony Henday Drive to Whitemud Drive November 28 5:00-8:00 p.m. December 1 10:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Let s Talk Today you can: Learn about the new direction
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN
PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN ESTABLISHING TARGETS FOR FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES: HIGHWAY SAFETY SOUTHEASTERN
More informationMINUTES. BROWARD COUNTY BICYCLING AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) MEETING WEDNESDAY, March 9 th, :30 PM
MINUTES BROWARD COUNTY BICYCLING AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (BPAC) MEETING WEDNESDAY, March 9 th, 2016 6:30 PM BROWARD COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL CENTER 115 South Andrews Avenue, Room 329 F Ft. Lauderdale,
More information