, Rev (C) (ARRV)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download ", Rev (C) (ARRV)"

Transcription

1 , Rev (C) (ARRV) ARRV TEST PROCEDURE Test No Test Title: Scientific Sonar Deep Water Operations Revision: (C) Contract No: 0650 Vessel: R/V Sikuliaq TEST PROCEDURE PREPARATION/APPROVAL/REVIEW APPROVED BY: PREPARED BY: RPATTON 9/03/2013 Date: R.PATTON 9/3/2013 MMC ENGINEERING D. Jalkanen 9/3/2013 PROGRAM MANAGER S. Wellens 9/3/2013 QUALITY ASSURANCE Date: Date: Date: Performed By MMC TEST PERFORMANCE SIGN-OFF Date: OWNER - UAF OWNER/ABS Witnessed Reviewed Date: ABS (if applicable) Witnessed Date: Reviewed Test Passed: Yes No See Comment Sheet Test Performance Reviewed: Test & Trials Superintendent Date: Quality Assurance Manager Date: 1

2 ARRV TEST PROCEDURE Test No Test Title: Scientific Sonar Deep Water Operations Revision: (C) Contract No: 0650 Vessel: , Rev (C) (ARRV) R/V Sikuliaq REVISION RECORD REV DESCRIPTION APPROVAL - Original Issue GML A Incorporated UAF Comments GML B Incorporated UAF/UNOLS comments. GML The test procedure number changed from to Revision level GML remains as it was in the stage 6 procedure. C Incorporated second set of UAF/UNOLS comments (ADCP NB & BB interference) GML 2

3 ARRV TEST PROCEDURE Test No Test Title: Scientific Sonar Deep Water Operations Revision: (C) Contract No: 0650 Vessel: R/V Sikuliaq TEST PROCEDURE 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 TEST OBJECTIVE : The purpose of this test is to show that the Scientific Sonar Systems have been correctly installed and operate as designed.. This test shall be accomplished outside of the Great Lakes in water deep enough for suitable operation. 1.2 TEST METHODS: None 1.3 EQUIPMENT INVOLVED IN TEST Teledyne, 75 KHz ADCP Teledyne, 150 KHz ADCP Kongsberg TOPAS Kongsberg EM710 Kongsberg EM ITEM TO BE TESTED: Systems listed above DWG EQUIPMENT CONFIGURATION See DWG ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS 1.6 SAFETY PRECAUTIONS: Federal, State and Company standards for shipyard employees will be enforced at ALL times Observe standard shipboard electrical safety precautions Ensure no personnel are on the vessels mast. 1.7 TEST EQUIPMENT REQUIRED TO COMPLETE VARIOUS METHODS OF TESTING IN SECTION 1.2: Sound Velocity Meter 1.8 PREREQUISITES 3

4 1.8.1 MMC Test Procedure Scientific Sonar Insulation Resistance Test needs to be completed and signed off MMC Test Procedure Scientific Sonar COAX TDR Time Domain Reflectometer needs to be completed and signed off MMC Test Procedure Scientific Sonar Light Off and Operation needs to be completed and signed off Read the entire applicable section of the procedure before starting this test Systems are completely installed and commissioned Gyrocompass should be operational Centerboard shall be in the flush position Seapath shall be operational 2.0 REFERENCES: 1. MMC DWG REV(-) 2. Installation/Operation Manuals of the applicable equipment if available 3.0 GENERAL NOTES 4.0 TEST INSTRUCTIONS & TEST DATA RECORDING: 4.1 ACCEPTANCE TESTING FOR A 75KHZ ADCP MOUNTED ON A MOVING PLATFORM Introduction This portion of the testing plan is intended to test ADCP operations at sea and confirm it adheres to RDI factory specifications. This procedure assumes that the Dockside Testing procedure has been performed and all testing criteria have passed or been confirmed to be operational. The following tests will not obtain favorable results if the previously mentioned testing has not been performed. The performance of any ADCP relies greatly upon the installation into any platform. There- fore, the system must be tested at sea to understand the effects of the platform on the ADCP performance. At Sea Testing includes tests for Acoustic Interference, Profiling Range, and Profiling Reasonableness testing. For each of these tests the following Equipment and ADCP setup requirements are recommended. Equipment Required o Ocean Surveyor 38kHz, 75kHz, or 150kHz ADCP or WH Mariner 300kHz ADCP o Computer o VMDAS Program o WINADCP Program o Navigation Interface Connected o Heading Interface Connected VMDAS Setup Table 5 minutes 10 minutes 4

5 5 ADCP Setup Table OS 38ADCP OS 75ADCP OS 150ADCP WH 300 Mariner ADCP WH600 Mariner ADCP WPO WPO WPO WP1 WP1 NP1 NP1 NP1 WS0400 WS0200 NS2400 NS1600 NS0800 WF0600 WF0400 NF1600 NF1000 NF0800 WN065 WN065 NN065 NN065 NN065 BP001 BP001 BP001 BP001 BP001 BX2000 BX1250 BX20000 BX15000 BX10000 WD WD ND ND ND TP TPOOOOSO TP TP TP TE TE TE TE TE EZ EZ EZ EZ EZ EXOOOOO EXOOOOO EXOOOOO EXOOOOO EXOOOOO EDOOOOO EDOOOOO EDOOOOO EDOOOOO EDOOOOO

6 6 7. Interference Testing The ADCP transmits and receives acoustic signals from the water. If other sonar devices are operating on the platform at the same time as the ADCP it is possible for those signals to bias the ADCP data. Therefore, all ADCP's must be tested to ensure that they are not receiving interference from other sonar equipment on board the vessel. The following Interference Test will determine if additional acoustic devices on board the vessel are interfering with the ADCP receive signal. Platform Testing Setup This test requires that the platform be navigated to a body of water that exceeds the maximum expected profiling range of the ADCP. Use the following table to determine the minimum water depth required. OS 38 ADCP OS 75 ADCP OS 150ADCP WH Mariner 300 ADCP WH Mariner 200 ADCP 1200 meters 1000 meters 800 meters 300 meters 150 meters Minimum Water Depth Requirement Platform speed for this test must be DRIFTING. The motors may be running if required for platform safety. The test sequence starts with ALL sonar and non-essential electronic equipment turned off. Only the ADCP should be on for the first test. This test will establish a base line for the interference and is critical to the rest of the tests. After a 10 minute period the first sonar device is turned on, transmission started, and the data is reviewed for interference terms.' At the end of this 10 minute period the first sonar device is turned off and the next sonar device is turned on and started pinging for 10 minutes. This process repeats for each of the sonar devices. Computer Screen Display Setup Ensure VMDAS is configured to have WinADCP enabled in the user Exit" tab. The RAW data (.ENR files) being collected by the VMDAS program will displayed in the WINADCP program contour plots for echo intensity data.this data will show the single ping return levels. Note: This Interference Test shall be ran in both Narrowband and Broadband mode.

7 7 4 TELEDYNE,. RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company 8. Interference Results Sheet If there is interference in the area of transmit/receive, the echo intensity data will show spurious echo intensity jobs. An example of what interference may look like is shown in the Figure below..!9 S l 1 ro 722 Sub 1 tom. 1 99Al :.I 99m/ S[IJ Interference will appear as periodic green blocks in the data set. Please note: interference will be lost in the upper part of the profile. However, it can be seen clearly seen once the system reaches the noise floor (point where there is no longer signals being returned from the water). Interference seen anywhere within the echo intensity profile data will result in a bias to the ADCP data. On the following page is a table to log the Interference Test Results.

8 8 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Device Type and Manufacturer Operating Frequency Pass or Fail ADCP only. No Sonar s or Equipment Running Interference Test Results Table

9 9 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for WATER PROFILE RANGE TESTING. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date Customer Representative Signature Date Printed Customer Representative Name Date D TESTWAIVED RDJ - initials Customer Representative initials

10 10 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company 9. Water Profile Range Testing The range of any ADCP is directly dependent on the level of backscattering material in the water, the transmit power into the water, the received sensitivity, and the level of the background noise. Each of these effects the range of the system in different ways but in the end can result in reduced or extended range. ADCP's transmit power and receive sensitivity are fixed based. However they may be effected by the installation of an acoustic window in front of the transducer because a window will absorb sound both transmitted by the ADCP and the sound returned from backscatter in the water. The volume of the backscatter in the water will also affect the range. All specifications for range assume that there is a certain amount of backscatter in the water. The backscatter volume is not controllable in any way. Background noise varies as the platform's speed increases or decreases. There are 2 types of noise created by the moving platform; first, there is the noise due to propeller and engines; and second, there is the noise created by the rushing water across the platform and ADCP transducer. This test is used to determine the effects of the background noise on the range of the ADCP. This information can be used to determine the optimum speed of the platform to obtain the desired range required. Platform Testing Setup This test requires that the platform be in water deeper than the ADCP's maximum expected profiling range. Use the following table to determine the minimum water depth required. OS 38 ADCP OS 75 ADCP OS 150 ADCP WH Mariner 300 WH Mariner 600 ADCP 1200 meters 1000 meters 600 meters 200 meters 100 meters Minimum Water Depth Requirement Platform course for this test MUST be a continuous straight line. The speed of the platform will be varied during this test. At each speed the system will be set to collect data for a minimum of 10 minutes. The following table lists the recommended speeds. Speed 1 Sp_eed 2 Speed 3 Speed 4 Speed 5 SQ_eed 6 Drifting 3 knots 6 knots 9 knots 12 knots Maximum Speed Platform Speed Computer Screen Display Setup The Tabular Display of the Long Term Average data (10 minute averages) will be viewed in the VMDAS program.

11 Range Results Sheet TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The data collected in the long term average (10 minutes) tabular display will be used to determine the maximum range of the ADCP. The maximum profiling range of the system is determined by locating the last valid bin and then using that ping to determine the range. To determine the last valid bin the following criterion is used: Platform Speed The last bin must be above the bottom side lobe area the bin must have a percent good value above 25% the correlation value for at least 3 beams must be above the threshold of 120 counts Locate the last valid bin for each of the speeds and fill in the table below. Last Valid Range to Bin Number Last Average RSSI Value at Last Bin Bin Date and Time of Measurement Notes: Platform Speed must be input as a measurement from the Bottom Track (if in range) or the GPS speed. Range to Last Bin is calculated as follows: ((bin size) (last bin number)) + (NF command) Average RSSI Value at Last Bin is the average of the 4 beams RSSI values in the last bin number Date and Time of Measurement is used to review these values during playback of the data The results from the above test should be compared to the specified nominal range of the system. Assuming that there are sufficient scatterers in the water, the acoustic window is not attenuating the signal, and that that the platform background noise is variable there should be a speed at which the nominal range of the system is obtained.

12 12 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for BOTTOM TRACKING TESTING. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date Customer Representative Signature Date Printed Customer Representative Name Date D TESTWAIVED RDI - initials Customer Representative initials

13 Bottom Tracking Testing TELEDYNE RD rnstruments A Teledyne Technologies Company The bottom tracking capability of the OS ADCP varies depending on the type of bottom (hard, soft, rock, sand, etc.), the slope of the bottom, and the speed of the vessel (back- ground noise). Before testing the Bottom Track capabilities the Water Profiling Range Test must be performed. Through the results of this test, determine the platform speed in which the range to the last valid bin obtained the specified nominal range of the OS ADCP frequency being used. Record the velocity here If it is not possible to reach the specified nominal range, determine the speed at which it allowed the best range possible. Calculate the percentage of the nominal range that was obtained by the system. Record the velocity here Record the percentage of range obtained here (actualrange/specified ranger1oo Platform Testing Setup The key to this test is to operate the system in an area where both the minimum and maximum bottom tracking range can be obtained. The platform will travel over water that is very shallow (<10 meters) to very deep (greater than the maximum bottom track range). It does not matter if the water starts deep and goes shallow or viceversa. The course of the platform must be a straight line. The platform speed must not be greater than the velocity recorded above. Computer Screen Display Setup View the raw data display of the VMDAS bottom track display window.

14 14 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company 12. Bottom Tracking Reasonableness Results Sheet Viewing the bottom track velocity data record the maximum and minimum average of the bottom track depths. Beam Number Minimum Depth (meters) Maximum Depth (metersl Beam 1 Beam 2 Beam 3 Beam 4 A PASS condition is identified if the maximum depth of the OS system is equal to the specification for the nominal bottom track range. Please note; if the system was not able to water profile to the nominal range, the bottom track range must be reduced to no more than the same percentage as the water profile loss. If the bottom track did obtain the complete range and the water profile did not then It is likely that there is Insufficient backscatter In the water to obtain the specified range. The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for RINGING TESTING. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date Customer Representative Signature Date

15 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Date Printed Customer Representative Name D TEST WAIVED RDI - initials Customer Representative initials 15

16 Ringing Testing TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The ADCP transmits an acoustic pulse into the water. The main lobe of this pulse bounces off particles in the water and the signals returned from these particles are used to calculate the velocity of the water. The main lobe of the transmitted pulse is what we are using to process and calculate a velocity. The transmitted pulse, however, is made up of many side lobes off the main lobe. These side lobes will come in contact with metal of the transducer beam itself and other items in the water. The energy from the side lobes will excite the metal of the transducer and anything bolted to the transducer. This causes the transducer and anything attached to it to resonate at the sys- tems transmit frequency. We refer to this as "RINGING". If the ADCP is in it's receive mode while the transducer is ringing then it will receive both the return signals from the water and the "ringing". Both of these signals are then processed bv the ADCP. The ringing causes bias to the velocity data. All ADCP's will "ring" for some amount of time. Therefore, each ADCP requires a blanking period (time of no data processing) to keep from processing the ringing energy. Each ADCP frequency has a different typical ringing duration. Therefore a blanking period (time of not processing data) is required at the beginning of each profile. The blanking distances required for the typical ringing period for each ADCP frequency is shown in the following table. Frequency_ 38kHz 75kHz 150kHz 300kHz 600kHz Typical Blank Period for Ringing 16 meters 8 meters 6 meters 4 meters 2 meters Ringing will bias the velocity estimation to a lower value (towards zero). However, when the platform motion is removed from the water profile data it will appear as a large velocity, which is the opposite of what it is really doing. This effect is caused because the vessel motion portion of the water profile data has been biased low (towards zero). Platform Testing Setup The key to success when performing this test will be to ensure the water velocity and direction remain stable over the entire test period of 120 minutes. This test requires that the platform be within the AOCP bottom tracking range. Use the following table to determine the optimum water depth range required. OS 38ADCP OS 75ADCP OS 150 ADCP WH Mariner 300 ADCP WH Mariner 600 ADCP meters meters meters meters meters Water Depth Requirement Platform speed must be held to a typical speed of 6-9 knots without loosing bottom tracking data for a period of 30 minutes. Some experimentation may be required to find the maximum bottom track speed for the given depths above.

17 17 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Computer Screen Display Setup The Magnitude and Direction Profile Display of the Long Term Average data (10 minute averages) will be viewed in the VMDAS program. 14. Ringing Results Sheet Unreasonable shears from bin 1 to bin 2 to bin 3 and so on should be evaluated using the Long Term average of the magnitude and direction profile. If an unreasonable shear is seen, it is most likely ringing. Therefore your blanking needs to be increased by the following formula: (bin size)* (last bin number with ringing)* 0.80 Record the results of the ringing tests in the following table. I Total Blanking Period Required' I "The total blanking period is typical blanking period plus the increased blanking period required. The above value should be used to change both the WF and NF (for the OS ADCP only) commands in all configuration files for the ADCP. The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for TRANSDUCER ALIGNMENT TESTING. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date

18 18 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Customer Representative Signature Date Printed Customer Representative Name Date D TEST WAIVED RDI - initials Customer Representative initials

19 Transducer Alignment Test TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The mounting alignment of the BB transducer to the relative position of the heading input from the vessel is critical in the velocity estimates made by the BB ADCP. If either of these are not known and corrected for it will result in both directional and velocity estimate errors water the velocity data. It is possible to confirm if the transducer alignment is correct by collecting data over the same water in several different directions. If the transducer is improperly aligned, both the magnitude and direction of the currents will appear the same in all directions that the platform travels. Platform Testing Setup The key to success on this test is that minimal water velocity and direction change over the entire test period. The following test will take a minimum of 5 hours to collect. This length of time is required in order to obtain enough data samples to reduce the noise sufficiently. This test requires that the platform be within the ADCP bot- tom tracking range, so that valid bottom track can be used, and that reliable GPS data be available (DGPS is recommended). Use the following table to determine the optimum water depth range required. OS 38ADCP OS 75 ADCP OS 150ADCP OS Mariner 300 ADCP OS Mariner 600ADCP meters meters meters meters meters Water Depth Requirement Platform speed is to be held at a constant speed. Any speed between 5-10 knots is acceptable, however once a speed is selected then the vessel should maintain that speed during the entire course. The course for this test contains a minimum of Slegs. Each leg must be a minimum of 30 minutes long (1-2 hours per leg is the optimal time). The course of ship travel is shown in the below figure. All data must be collected in beam coordinates Minimum of 'i Minutes Per Minutes Per Leg Minimum Time 4.5 to 7 l Minutes Per '"T"" LJU

20 20 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Computer Screen Display Setup View the VMDAS ship track display of bin 3 with the bottom track reference. The Long Term Average (5 minute averages) data should be viewed. 16. Transducer Alignment Results Sheet A PASS condition is identified if the velocities in each of the ship track plotted directions has the reasonably the same magnitude and direction. It is common to see some wild velocity magnitude and directions. This happens as a result of the effects of the turn on the gyro heading device or the latency of the heading updates for a GPS heading input. If the direction of the currents is not the same in each of the directions then it will be necessary to enter in a transducer misalignment angle. The 5 minute averages of both GPS and Bottom Track Direction are compared in at least 2 of the legs traveled. An average direction along each leg is calculated for both the GPS and Bottom Track data. The difference in the average directions is the misalignment angle. Record the results of this portion of the Transducer Alignment with Bottom Track Reference with the formula: Misalignment Angle= (GPS Average Direction)- (Bottom Track Average Direction) I Misalignment Angle Required Degrees I Changing the transducer alignment angle, reprocessing the data, and finally playing back the same data file again allows you to confirm if the misalignment angle correction is correct. A pass condition is if the velocities in each of the ship track plotted directions has the reasonably the same magnitude and direction. It is common to see some wild velocity magnitude and directions. Record the results of the verification of the Transducer Alignment with Bottom Track Reference: I Alignment Verification Pass/Fail I Change the data display reference from bottom track to the navigation data in the VMDAS program. A pass condition exists if little to no change in the velocity magnitude and direction occurred when switching to the navigation data reference Record the results of this portion of the Transducer Alignment with Navigation Reference: I Navigation Verification Pass/Fail I

21 21..._..._TELEDYNE ll' RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Sea Acceptance Test Results Sheet TEST Interference Testing RESULT Interference Found Yes/No Interference Testing This test only states whether interference is present. If interference is found then the equipment causing the interference must not be operated with the ADCP or user must synchronize the ADCP and the other device so that interference is avoided. Interference does not result in a failure of this Sea Acceptance Test. This test is for operational information only. TEST Water Profile Range Testing RESULT: Range Pass/Fail Specifications Range Testing This test determines which speed the ADCP will provide profiling range to the factory specification. Ship speed, backscatter in the water column, ship motion, and other environmental factors will affect the range of the system. The ADCP is considered to be passing this test if it either meets the profiling range specification at least at a single speed and/or the range is reasonable given the other conditions. TEST Bottom Profile Range Testing RESULT: Range Pass/Fail Specifications Range Testing This test determines which speed the ADCP will provide bottom tracking range to the factory specification. Ship speed, backscatter in the water column, ship motion, and other environmental factors will affect the range of the system. The ADCP is considered to be passing this test if it either meets the profiling range specification at least at a single speed and/or the range is reasonable given the other conditions. TEST Ringing Testing RESULT Range of Ringing Ringing Test This test determines the minimum blanking required. The results of this test do not determine a pass/fail condition but only the minimum setup requirements for proper operation.

22 22 4TELEDYNE II" RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company TEST Transducer Ar gnment Tesfmg RESULT: Transducer Alignment Angle Transducer Alignment Test This test determines the transducer alignment angle required. The results of this test do not determine a pass/fail condition but only the setup requirements for proper operation. The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for deployment. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date Signed Customer Representative Signature Date

23 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Customer Representative Signature Date Printed Customer Representative Name Date 23

24 4.2 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company ACCEPTANCE TESTING FOR AN 150KHZ ADCP MOUNTED ON A MOVING PLATFORM Introduction This portion of the testing plan is intended to test ADCP operations at sea and confirm it adheres to RDI factory specifications. This procedure assumes that the Dockside Testing procedure has been performed and all testing criteria have passed or been confirmed to be operational. The following tests will not obtain favorable results if the previously mentioned testing has not been performed. The performance of any ADCP relies greatly upon the installation into any platform. Therefore, the system must be tested at sea to understand the effects of the platform on the ADCP performance. At Sea Testing includes tests for Acoustic Interference, Profiling Range, and Profiling Reasonableness testing. For each of these tests the following Equipment and ADCP setup requirements are recommended. Equipment Required o Ocean Surveyor 38kHz, 75kHz, or 150kHz ADCP or WH Mariner 300kHz ADCP o Computer o VMDAS Program o WINADCP Program o Navigation Interface Connected o Heading Interface Connected VMDAS Setup Table 5 minutes 10 minutes ADCP Setup Table OS 38ADCP OS 75ADCP OS 150ADCP WH 300 Mariner ADCP WH600 Mariner ADCP WPO WPO WPO WP1 WP1 NP1 NP1 NP1 WS0400 WS0200 NS2400 NS1600 NS0800 WF0600 WF0400 NF1600 NF1000 NF0800 WN065 WN065 24

25 25 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company NN065 NN065 NN065 BP001 BP001 BP001 BP001 BP001 BX2000 BX1250 BX20000 BX15000 BX10000 WD WD ND ND ND TP TPOOOOSO TP TP TP TE TE TE TE TE EZ EZ EZ EZ EZ EXOOOOO EXOOOOO EXOOOOO EXOOOOO EXOOOOO EDOOOOO EDOOOOO EDOOOOO EDOOOOO EDOOOOO

26 26 7. Interference Testing TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The ADCP transmits and receives acoustic signals from the water. If other sonar devices are operating on the platform at the same time as the ADCP it is possible for those signals to bias the ADCP data. Therefore, all ADCP's must be tested to ensure that they are not receiving interference from other sonar equipment on board the vessel. The following Interference Test will determine if additional acoustic devices on board the vessel are interfering with the ADCP receive signal. Platform Testing Setup This test requires that the platform be navigated to a body of water that exceeds the maximum expected profiling range of the ADCP. Use the following table to determine the minimum water depth required. OS 38 ADCP OS 75 ADCP OS 150ADCP WH Mariner 300 ADCP WH Mariner 200 ADCP 1200 meters 1000 meters 800 meters 300 meters 150 meters Minimum Water Depth Requirement Platform speed for this test must be DRIFTING. The motors may be running if required for platform safety. The test sequence starts with ALL sonar and non-essential electronic equipment turned off. Only the ADCP should be on for the first test. This test will establish a base line for the interference and is criticalto the rest of the tests. After a 10 minute period the first sonar device is turned on, transmission started, and the data is reviewed for interference terms.' At the end of this 10 minute period the first sonar device is turned off and the next sonar device is turned on and started pinging for 10 minutes. This process repeats for each of the sonar devices. Computer Screen Display Setup Ensure VMDAS is configured to have WinADCP enabled in the user Exit" tab. The RAW data (.ENR files) being collected by the VMDAS program will displayed in the WINADCP program contour plots for echo intensity data.this data will show the single ping return levels. Note: This Interference Test shall be ran in both Narrowband and Broadband mode.

27 27 4 TELEDYNE,. RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company 8. Interference Results Sheet If there is interference in the area of transmit/receive, the echo intensity data will show spurious echo intensity jobs. An example of what interference may look like is shown in the Figure below..!9 S l 1 ro 722 Sub 1 tom. 1 99Al :.I 99m/ S[IJ Interference will appear as periodic green blocks in the data set. Please note: interference will be lost in the upper part of the profile. However, it can be seen clearly seen once the system reaches the noise floor (point where there is no longer signals being returned from the water). Interference seen anywhere within the echo intensity profile data will result in a bias to the ADCP data. On the following page is a table to log the Interference Test Results.

28 28 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Device Type and Manufacturer Operating Frequency Pass or Fail ADCP only. No Sonar s or Equipment Running Interference Test Results Table

29 29 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for WATER PROFILE RANGE TESTING. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date Customer Representative Signature Date Printed Customer Representative Name Date D TESTWAIVED RDJ - initials Customer Representative initials

30 30 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company 9. Water Profile Range Testing The range of any ADCP is directly dependent on the level of backscattering material in the water, the transmit power into the water, the received sensitivity, and the level of the background noise. Each of these effects the range of the system in different ways but in the end can result in reduced or extended range. ADCP's transmit power and receive sensitivity are fixed based. However they may be effected by the installation of an acoustic window in front of the transducer because a window will absorb sound both transmitted by the ADCP and the sound returned from backscatter in the water. The volume of the backscatter in the water will also affect the range. All specifications for range assume that there is a certain amount of backscatter in the water. The backscatter volume is not controllable in any way. Background noise varies as the platform's speed increases or decreases. There are 2 types of noise created by the moving platform; first, there is the noise due to propeller and engines; and second, there is the noise created by the rushing water across the platform and ADCP transducer. This test is used to determine the effects of the background noise on the range of the ADCP. This information can be used to determine the optimum speed of the platform to obtain the desired range required. Platform Testing Setup This test requires that the platform be in water deeper than the ADCP's maximum expected profiling range. Use the following table to determine the minimum water depth required. OS 38 ADCP OS 75 ADCP OS 150 ADCP WH Mariner 300 WH Mariner 600 ADCP 1200 meters 1000 meters 600 meters 200 meters 100 meters Minimum Water Depth Requirement Platform course for this test MUST be a continuous straight line. The speed of the platform will be varied during this test. At each speed the system will be set to collect data for a minimum of 10 minutes. The following table lists the recommended speeds. Speed 1 Sp_eed 2 Speed 3 Speed 4 Speed 5 SQ_eed 6 Drifting 3 knots 6 knots 9 knots 12 knots Maximum Speed Platform Speed Computer Screen Display Setup The Tabular Display of the Long Term Average data (10 minute averages) will be viewed in the VMDAS program.

31 Range Results Sheet TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The data collected in the long term average (10 minutes) tabular display will be used to determine the maximum range of the ADCP. The maximum profiling range of the system is determined by locating the last valid bin and then using that ping to determine the range. To determine the last valid bin the following criterion is used: The last bin must be above the bottom side lobe area the bin must have a percent good value above 25% the correlation value for at least 3 beams must be above the threshold of 120 counts Locate the last valid bin for each of the speeds and fill in the table below. Last Valid Range to Bin Number Last Platform Speed Average RSSI Value at Last Bin Bin Date and Time of Measurement Notes: Platform Speed must be input as a measurement from the Bottom Track (if in range) or the GPS speed. Range to Last Bin is calculated as follows: ((bin size) (last bin number)) + (NF command) Average RSSI Value at Last Bin is the average of the 4 beams RSSI values in the last bin number Date and Time of Measurement is used to review these values during playback of the data The results from the above test should be compared to the specified nominal range of the system. Assuming that there are sufficient scatterers in the water, the acoustic window is not attenuating the signal, and that that the platform background noise is variable there should be a speed at which the nominal range of the system is obtained.

32 32 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for BOTTOM TRACKING TESTING. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date Customer Representative Signature Date Printed Customer Representative Name Date D TESTWAIVED RDI - initials Customer Representative initials

33 Bottom Tracking Testing TELEDYNE RD rnstruments A Teledyne Technologies Company The bottom tracking capability of the OS ADCP varies depending on the type of bottom (hard, soft, rock, sand, etc.), the slope of the bottom, and the speed of the vessel (back- ground noise). Before testing the Bottom Track capabilities the Water Profiling Range Test must be performed. Through the results of this test, determine the platform speed in which the range to the last valid bin obtained the specified nominal range of the OS ADCP frequency being used. Record the velocity here If it is not possible to reach the specified nominal range, determine the speed at which it allowed the best range possible. Calculate the percentage of the nominal range that was obtained by the system. Record the velocity here Record the percentage of range obtained here (actualrange/specified ranger1oo Platform Testing Setup The key to this test is to operate the system in an area where both the minimum and maximum bottom tracking range can be obtained. The platform will travel over water that is very shallow (<10 meters) to very deep (greater than the maximum bottom track range). It does not matter if the water starts deep and goes shallow or viceversa. The course of the platform must be a straight line. The platform speed must not be greater than the velocity recorded above. Computer Screen Display Setup View the raw data display of the VMDAS bottom track display window.

34 34 4 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company 12. Bottom Tracking Reasonableness Results Sheet Viewing the bottom track velocity data record the maximum and minimum average of the bottom track depths. Beam Number Minimum Depth (meters) Maximum Depth (metersl Beam 1 Beam 2 Beam 3 Beam 4 A PASS condition is identified if the maximum depth of the OS system is equal to the specification for the nominal bottom track range. Please note; if the system was not able to water profile to the nominal range, the bottom track range must be reduced to no more than the same percentage as the water profile loss. If the bottom track did obtain the complete range and the water profile did not then It is likely that there is Insufficient backscatter In the water to obtain the specified range. The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for RINGING TESTING. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date Customer Representative Signature Date

35 35 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Printed Customer Representative Name Date D TEST WAIVED RDI - initials Customer Representative initials

36 Ringing Testing TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The ADCP transmits an acoustic pulse into the water. The main lobe of this pulse bounces off particles in the water and the signals returned from these particles are used to calculate the velocity of the water. The main lobe of the transmitted pulse is what we are using to process and calculate a velocity. The transmitted pulse, however, is made up of many side lobes off the main lobe. These side lobes will come in contact with metal of the transducer beam itself and other items in the water. The energy from the side lobes will excite the metal of the transducer and anything bolted to the transducer. This causes the transducer and anything attached to it to resonate at the sys- tems transmit frequency. We refer to this as "RINGING". If the ADCP is in it's receive mode while the transducer is ringing then it will receive both the return signals from the water and the "ringing". Both of these signals are then processed bv the ADCP. The ringing causes bias to the velocity data. All ADCP's will "ring" for some amount of time. Therefore, each ADCP requires a blanking period (time of no data processing) to keep from processing the ringing energy. Each ADCP frequency has a different typical ringing duration. Therefore a blanking period (time of not processing data) is required at the beginning of each profile. The blanking distances required for the typical ringing period for each ADCP frequency is shown in the following table. Frequency_ 38kHz 75kHz 150kHz 300kHz 600kHz Typical Blank Period for Ringing 16 meters 8 meters 6 meters 4 meters 2 meters Ringing will bias the velocity estimation to a lower value (towards zero). However, when the platform motion is removed from the water profile data it will appear as a large velocity, which is the opposite of what it is really doing. This effect is caused because the vessel motion portion of the water profile data has been biased low (towards zero). Platform Testing Setup The key to success when performing this test will be to ensure the water velocity and direction remain stable over the entire test period of 120 minutes. This test requires that the platform be within the AOCP bottom tracking range. Use the following table to determine the optimum water depth range required. OS 38ADCP OS 75ADCP OS 150 ADCP WH Mariner 300 ADCP WH Mariner 600 ADCP meters meters meters meters meters Water Depth Requirement Platform speed must be held to a typical speed of 6-9 knots without loosing bottom tracking data for a period of 30 minutes. Some experimentation may be required to find the maximum bottom track speed for the given depths above.

37 37 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Computer Screen Display Setup The Magnitude and Direction Profile Display of the Long Term Average data (10 minute averages) will be viewed in the VMDAS program. 14. Ringing Results Sheet Unreasonable shears from bin 1 to bin 2 to bin 3 and so on should be evaluated using the Long Term average of the magnitude and direction profile. If an unreasonable shear is seen, it is most likely ringing. Therefore your blanking needs to be increased by the following formula: (bin size)* (last bin number with ringing)* 0.80 Record the results of the ringing tests in the following table. I Total Blanking Period Required' I "The total blanking period is typical blanking period plus the increased blanking period required. The above value should be used to change both the WF and NF (for the OS ADCP only) commands in all configuration files for the ADCP. The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for TRANSDUCER ALIGNMENT TESTING. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date

38 38 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Customer Representative Signature Date Printed Customer Representative Name Date D TEST WAIVED RDI - initials Customer Representative initials

39 Transducer Alignment Test TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The mounting alignment of the BB transducer to the relative position of the heading input from the vessel is critical in the velocity estimates made by the BB ADCP. If either of these are not known and corrected for it will result in both directional and velocity estimate errors water the velocity data. It is possible to confirm if the transducer alignment is correct by collecting data over the same water in several different directions. If the transducer is improperly aligned, both the magnitude and direction of the currents will appear the same in all directions that the platform travels. Platform Testing Setup The key to success on this test is that minimal water velocity and direction change over the entire test period. The following test will take a minimum of 5 hours to collect. This length of time is required in order to obtain enough data samples to reduce the noise sufficiently. This test requires that the platform be within the ADCP bot- tom tracking range, so that valid bottom track can be used, and that reliable GPS data be available (DGPS is recommended). Use the following table to determine the optimum water depth range required. OS 38ADCP OS 75 ADCP OS 150ADCP OS Mariner 300 ADCP OS Mariner 600ADCP meters meters meters meters meters Water Depth Requirement Platform speed is to be held at a constant speed. Any speed between 5-10 knots is acceptable, however once a speed is selected then the vessel should maintain that speed during the entire course. The course for this test contains a minimum of Slegs. Each leg must be a minimum of 30 minutes long (1-2 hours per leg is the optimal time). The course of ship travel is shown in the below figure. All data must be collected in beam coordinates Minimum of 'i Minutes Per Minutes Per Leg Minimum Time 4.5 to 7 l Minutes Per '"T"" LJU

40 40 TELEDYNE RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Computer Screen Display Setup View the VMDAS ship track display of bin 3 with the bottom track reference. The Long Term Average (5 minute averages) data should be viewed. 16. Transducer Alignment Results Sheet A PASS condition is identified if the velocities in each of the ship track plotted directions has the reasonably the same magnitude and direction. It is common to see some wild velocity magnitude and directions. This happens as a result of the effects of the turn on the gyro heading device or the latency of the heading updates for a GPS heading input. If the direction of the currents is not the same in each of the directions then it will be necessary to enter in a transducer misalignment angle. The 5 minute averages of both GPS and Bottom Track Direction are compared in at least 2 of the legs traveled. An average direction along each leg is calculated for both the GPS and Bottom Track data. The difference in the average directions is the misalignment angle. Record the results of this portion of the Transducer Alignment with Bottom Track Reference with the formula: Misalignment Angle= (GPS Average Direction)- (Bottom Track Average Direction) I Misalignment Angle Required Degrees I Changing the transducer alignment angle, reprocessing the data, and finally playing back the same data file again allows you to confirm if the misalignment angle correction is correct. A pass condition is if the velocities in each of the ship track plotted directions has the reasonably the same magnitude and direction. It is common to see some wild velocity magnitude and directions. Record the results of the verification of the Transducer Alignment with Bottom Track Reference: I Alignment Verification Pass/Fail I Change the data display reference from bottom track to the navigation data in the VMDAS program. A pass condition exists if little to no change in the velocity magnitude and direction occurred when switching to the navigation data reference Record the results of this portion of the Transducer Alignment with Navigation Reference: I Navigation Verification Pass/Fail I

41 41..._..._TELEDYNE ll' RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Sea Acceptance Test Results Sheet TEST Interference Testing RESULT Interference Found Yes/No Interference Testing This test only states whether interference is present. If interference is found then the equipment causing the interference must not be operated with the ADCP or user must synchronize the ADCP and the other device so that interference is avoided. Interference does not result in a failure of this Sea Acceptance Test. This test is for operational information only. TEST Water Profile Range Testing RESULT: Range Pass/Fail Specificstions Range Testing This test determines which speed the ADCP will provide profiling range to the factory specification. Ship speed, backscatter in the water column, ship motion, and other environmental factors will affect the range of the system. The ADCP is considered to be passing this test if it either meets the profiling range specification at least at a single speed and/or the range is reasonable given the other conditions. TEST Bottom Profile Range Testing RESULT: Range Pass/Fail Specificstions Range Testing This test determines which speed the ADCP will provide bottom tracking range to the factory specification. Ship speed, backscatter in the water column, ship motion, and other environmental factors will affect the range of the system. The ADCP is considered to be passing this test if it either meets the profiling range specification at least at a single speed and/or the range is reasonable given the other conditions. TEST Ringing Testing RESULT Range of Ringing Ringing Test This test determines the minimum blanking required. The results of this test do not determine a pass/fail condition but only the minimum setup requirements for proper operation.

42 42 4TELEDYNE II" RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company TEST Transducer Ar gnment Tesfmg RESULT: Transducer Alignment Angle Transducer Alignment Test This test determines the transducer alignment angle required. The results of this test do not determine a pass/fail condition but only the setup requirements for proper operation. The above tests confirm the ADCP is operating according to factory specifications and ready for deployment. RD Instruments Field Service Engineer Signature Date Signed Customer Representative Signature Date

43 43 4 TELEDYNE Ill" RD INSTRUMENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company The addendum portion of this document is for the purposes of outlining any outstanding testing, configuration, or operational conditions that may exist with the manufactured supplied product. CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVE ADDENDUM

44 Customer Representative Signature Date Printed Customer Representative Name Date 44

45 4.3 KONGSBERG DEFENCE SYSTEMS Sensor Systems N-7500 Stjørdal Norway Telephone Fax Document number: SATP Title : TOPAS PS 18 Parametric Sub-Bottom Profiler Sea Acceptance Test Procedure Rev. Date Prepared by Approved ECO no. Pages MK 8 A 29/08/2006 HA 9 B 01/10/2012 JD 8 THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF KONGSBERG DEF ENCE & AEROSPACE AS This document, and any authorised reproduction thereof, must not be used in any way against the interest of Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS.

46 The contents must not be published or disclosed to a third party, in whole or in part, without the written consent of Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace AS. Any authorised reproduction, in whole or in part, must include this legend. 46

47 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Document history y Details GENERAL REF ERENCES TEST EQUIPMENT LIST OF ITEMS CONFIGURATION INTERCONNECTION/ARRANGEMENT TEST P ROCEDURE Test of transceiver TOPAS PS Sensor inputs COMMENTS... 8 Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

48 1. DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Rev Changes/Comment Original issue. s 01/10/2012 B Minor modifications 2. DETAILS Vessel/Project: Customer: Date of approval: Water depth: Survey: 3. GENERAL The purpose of this test is to verify that the system is functioning according to specifications after installation on board the vessel, and also to serve as a record of the successful completion of the TOPAS installation. 4. REFERENCES Harbor Acceptance Test documentation HATP TEST EQUIPMENT No specific additional test equipment is required to perform the test. Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

49 6. LIST OF ITEMS The number of items to be tested in the list below can vary as it depends on the equipment included in the current installation. Use column 2 to indicate which items that are included for this particular delivery. List of items to be tested Item Incl. Equipment Registratio n 1 PS 18 Transducer Unit On/Off Box PS 18 Transceiver Post Processing SW 5 MR 18 Multi-channel receiver Motion Reference Unit (MRU 7 8 ) 9 10 Serial number Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

50 7. CONFIGURATION See Factory Acceptance Test and Harbour Acceptance Test results for this specific delivery. 8. INTERCONNECTION/ARRANGEMENT No special arrangement is required to perform the tests. The system shall be installed for normal operation on board the vessel and all external units shall be connected (navigation computer and VRU). Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

51 9. TEST PROCEDURE The tests are performed by means of the tables in the following pages. Fill in the results in the appropriate column and sign at the bottom of each page. 9.1 Test of transceiver TOPAS PS 18 The system is connected to all sensors and on line. Test site should be in a reasonable flat area with recommended water depth in the range between 500 and 3000 meters. Test and Check List Item(s) to be tested All Function to be tested Verify position from navigation computer on console. All Verify external depth on console. OK! All All All All All All System test: Set up the following system parameters: Ping interval: 1000 to 4000 ms, CW mode with 3 khz secondary frequency; level: 0 db or 2-5kHz/10mS chirp and 0 db level in deep or noisy areas Ch1: Trace length: 200mS. Adjust delay, gain and processing. Display data on monitor. Ch2: Trace length: 100mS. Adjust delay, gain and processing. Display data on monitor. Optional! Ch3: Trace length: 100mS. Adjust delay, gain and processing. Display data on monitor. Optional! Enable bottom tracking. Verify depth on monitor Test the heave compensation. Verify compensation by enabling/disabling the compensation. Set external trig mode. Verify that system is trigged. Require sync unit or similar installed onboard Expected Test Results OK! OK! OK! OK! OK! OK! OK! Measured Result Performed by (date/sign) Witnessed by (date/sign) PreSAT: SAT: PreSAT: SAT: Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

52 9.2 Sensor inputs This ship will have the following sensors (mark and fill in necessary information): 1. VRU type: o Seatex MRU-5 o Seatex MRU-6 o Seapath 200/300 o Other TOPAS PS 18 is set up to read VRU-data on a RS422/RS232 port in EM3000 format. 2. Navigation Input: Format of navigation string. o NMEA 183 o Simrad 90 o Other Item Sensor Test Result 1 VRU 2 Navigation 3 Performed by (date/sign) Witnessed by (date/sign) PreSAT: SAT: PreSAT: SAT: Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

53 10. COMMENTS SAT Performed By: Signature: SAT Witnessed By: Signature: Date: Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

54 4.4 Sea Acceptance Test Product: Produkt: EM 710 Multibeam Echo Sounder Product reg.no: Produkt reg.nr: Doc.reg.no: Dokument reg.nr: Doc.archive no: Dokument arkiv-nr: AA000 Rev.A Created by: Rev.A Laget av: Rev.A Controlled by: Rev.A Sjekket av: Rev.A Approved by: Rev.A Godkjent av: KEN/BHL BHL KEN Revision: Revisjon: A B C D E F Date: Dato: April 18, Jan 2011 Contents 1 DOCUMENT HISTORY INTRODUCTION REFERENCES TEST EQUIPMENT LIST OF ITEMS CONFIGURATION SOFTWARE INTERCONNECTION/ARRANGEMENT TEST PROCEDURE Test of Interfaces Sensor Offset/Calibration Survey Noise and Sea Conditions Performance Assessment TESTIMONIAL... 10

55 1 DOCUM ENT HISTORY Rev Description of changes A Original issue. KTU Created by 2 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this procedure is to verify that the system as installed is fully functional at sea, and to serve as a record of the successful completion of the Sea Acceptance Test. It is to be followed to verify correct functioning of the multibeam echo sounder and the various external sensors or systems as an integrated mapping system. It will also verify that the system interfaces and peripherals are functional. The sea trials shall establish: that the different EM 710 units work properly at sea that the heave, roll and pitch signals are correctly used that the heading signal is correctly used that the sound speed input data are correctly used that the positioning system data are correctly used that the system is capable of providing good depth data consistently that the system during operation produces digital data to its internal storage devices and, if available, to an external logging system connected via Ethernet The Sea Acceptance Test shall consist of a verification of correct interfacing of external sensors, a calibration of external sensor offsets and time delays, a test survey, and assessment of the data from the test survey. In addition, as far as time and external conditions allow, limitations on system performance as a function of water depth, vessel speed and sea state shall be established. 3 REFERENCES Factory and Harbour Acceptance Test records. 4 TEST EQUIPMENT No special test equipment is required for the Sea Acceptance Test, but all sensors normally needed for surveying with a Multibeam echo sounder shall be available. Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

56 5 LIST OF ITEMS The items which are to be tested, will depend on the particular configuration. Use the manufacturer type number column to indicate which items are actually included in this particular delivery or furnished by the owner to be used with the system. List of items to be tested Item Manufacturer, type and/or registration number Equipment 1 EM 710 TRANSCEIVER UNIT 2 HYDROGRAPHIC WORKSTATION 3 HEADING SENSOR 4 MOTION SENSOR 5 FIXED SOUND SPEED SENSOR 6 SOUND SPEED PROFILE SENSOR 7 POSITIONING SYSTEM 8 9 Serial number 6 CONFIGURATION The modules and circuit boards included in the system and their serial numbers were noted in the Factory and Harbour Acceptance tests. Any replacement modules or circuit boards since the HAT must be noted. Replacement list Item Equipment Registration number Serial number Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

57 7 SOFTW ARE The system software version must be noted, including the subsystems, and reflecting any changes made during the trials. Item Equipment Version number 1 BSP 67B master version 2 BSP 67B slave version 3 CPU version 4 DDS version 5 RX 32 version 6 TX 36 version 7 SIS Software version (press the icon located on the bottom line in the SIS window) Version date 8 INTERCONNECTION/ARRANGEMENT The system shall have been installed according to the Installation Manual. Note the locations of the transducers, motion sensor(s) and positioning system(s) as entered on the Operator Station: X (forward pos) Y (starboard pos) Z (downwards) TX transducer RX transducer Motion sensor no 1 Motion sensor no 2 Positioning system no 1 Positioning system no 2 Positioning system no 3 Pos. system Ethernet Waterline downward NA NA Note the transducer alignment angles as entered on the Operator Station: Roll Pitch Heading TX transducer RX transducer Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

58 9 TEST PROCEDURE The test will be documented through the tables on the following pages. The tests shall generally be done in the following order: Interface tests Calibration Survey Data assessment Assessment of the survey data collected should preferably be done on board. Note that the noise measurements and test of performance with regard to depth and/or sea state are to be run in the order which best suits the conditions during the test period. It is not expected that many different conditions will be encountered during the limited time available for the sea acceptance test. However, it is strongly advised that as different conditions are encountered during later use of the system, the system performance as a function of external conditions is noted, for example in this record. This will be valuable for later use in survey planning and in ensuring the most efficient use of the system. 9.1 Test of Interfaces Tests of the external sensor interfaces should have been run during the Harbour Acceptance test. However, these tests were necessarily limited (static only), and may not even have been done due to non-availability or non-functionality of external sensors. Thus the data from the external sensors should be observed on the system display during vessel maneuvering, and verified for correctness (positions and clock) or correct sign and/or reasonable magnitude (heave, roll, pitch, heading and sound speed). Data will be logged during the test, all connected hard-copy devices should be employed, and sound speed profiles loaded into the system. Observe that this is functional. Fill in the table below to record this. Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

59 Test no. Function to be tested 1 Position input 2 External clock input 3 Transducer depth sound speed input 4 Sound speed profile input 5 Heading input 6 Motion data input 7 Data output to internal storage 8 Data output to external storage 9 Data output to external Ethernet 10 Postscript printer 11 Printer/plotter/recorder output Test result Notes 9.2 Sensor Offset/Calibration The offset or zero bias of the roll, pitch and heading sensors and the time delay of the position system(s) are to be measured or estimated before leaving port if possible (this is especially important with regard to the heading sensor). A calibration of these offsets shall be performed at sea as the second part of the test in accordance with the procedures given in the Operator Manual. Finally, these offsets shall be estimated from the final test survey. Fill in the table below with the offsets as entered into the Operator Station: Roll offset system 1 Roll offset system 2 Pitch offset system 1 Pitch offset system 2 Heading offset system 1 Heading offset system 2 Position time delay system 1 Position time delay system 2 Position time delay system 3 Port Estimate Calibration result Final Estimate Note the positioning system type used during the sea acceptance test and its estimated accuracy: Positioning system type 1:... Estimated accuracy for position system:... Positioning system type 2:... Estimated accuracy for position system:... Positioning system type 3:... Estimated accuracy for position system:... Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

60 9.3 Survey The integrity of the total survey system consisting of the multibeam echo sounder as installed on the vessel, motion sensor, heading sensor, sound speed sensor(s), and positioning system(s) shall be assessed by doing a survey of a limited area and inspecting the collected data. The result should be compared against the specified accuracy of the echo sounder, taking into account the precision of the external sensors, and any limitations imposed by the vessel and its handling. Note that this test is not designed to measure the accuracy of the echo sounder itself, as this would require a much more extensive test period, and has been done on previous system installations. The sea acceptance test s main part will be a sensor calibration followed by a system assessment survey in the calibration area. The area used for the sea trials should thus consist at least partly of a relatively flat bottom and partly of a significant slope as required for a calibration in accordance with the guidelines for calibration as given in the Operator Manual. In case this is not possible the calibration of the various sensors must be run in separate areas while the final assessment survey should be run in the flat part used for roll calibration. The depth should then ideally be in the m range (not critical). Five parallel lines should be run with line spacing equal to about one quarter of the achieved coverage in the actual area. Neighboring lines should be run in opposite directions. The line length should be in the order of twice the achieved coverage. A sixth line should be run perpendicular to and across the five previous lines. Assess the data with the system s grid display using a grid cell size giving about soundings per cell. Using the various display options, investigate the frequency and magnitude of outliers, discrepancies between lines, and depth differences within cells. Use also the calibration profile displays to assess any remaining errors due to roll offset or sound speed profile problems. If the performance of the system is not according to expectation, describe the results in the Comment section below, otherwise note that the system performance is accepted. Any un-resolvable performance problems should be further investigated and quantified with a post-processing system such as Neptune from Kongsberg. Note the area with positions and depths where the Customer Acceptance Test has been performed: CAT area:... CAT position:... CAT depth:... Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

61 9.4 Noise and Sea Conditions Performance Assessment During the sea acceptance test, the performance of the whole system shall be assessed. The important factors limiting achievable accuracy and coverage are noise (vessel and environmental) and sea state. With heavy seas it is to be expected that the performance will also depend upon vessel heading with respect to wave direction. On some vessels the noise level at particular speeds and propeller revolutions may also affect coverage. It is recommended to assess achieved coverage as a function of environmental parameters both during the sea acceptance test and later operation. The results should be entered in the table below, both to document conditions during the test and later to have a record of the system's performance according to external conditions. The noise experienced by the system may be measured from the Operator Station as described in the Operator Manual. Several measurements should be taken and the result averaged before noting it in the table below: Date Depth (m) Sea State Heading Against Waves Speed RPM Noise Comments The coverage is assessed by observing the swath width on the Operator Station on a reasonably flat bottom. The average of several pings and any occurrence of missed pings should be noted in the table below: Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

62 Date Depth (m) Sea State Heading Against Waves Speed (kn) RPM Abs. coeff. Coverage (m) Missing Pings, Comments Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

63 10 TESTI M ONIAL The SEA ACCEPTANCE TEST for the EM 710, for. has been performed according to the test procedure. The SAT approval is only valid if the test is performed by an engineer certified by Kongsberg Martime A/S. The test is: Accepted / Not accepted (Delete as appropriate) Remarks: Test performed by Position Date (Please use capital letters).. Test accepted by Position Date (Please use capital letters).... Signatures: Proprietary rights/reproduction; see cover

64 4.5 Sea Acceptance Test Product: Produkt: EM 302 Multibeam Echo Sounder Product reg.no: Produkt reg.nr: Doc.reg.no: Dokument reg.nr: Doc.archive no: Dokument arkiv-nr: Rev.A Created by: Rev.A Laget av: Rev.A Controlled by: Rev.A Sjekket av: Rev.A Approved by: Rev.A Godkjent av: KTU KEN Revision: Revisjon: A B C D E F Date: Dato: Feb 18, Jan 2011 Contents 1 DOCUMENT HISTORY INTRODUCTION REFERENCES TEST EQUIPMENT LIST OF ITEMS CONFIGURATION SOFTWARE INTERCONNECTION/ARRANGEMENT TEST PROCEDURE Test of Interfaces Sensor Offset/Calibration Survey Noise and Sea Conditions Performance Assessment TESTIMONIAL... 10

USCGC HEALY WAGB-20 Final Report RD Instruments Inc. Ocean Surveyor 75 khz Prepared by: Ron Hippe Commissioning Dates: 3/27/2002-3/30/2002

USCGC HEALY WAGB-20 Final Report RD Instruments Inc. Ocean Surveyor 75 khz Prepared by: Ron Hippe Commissioning Dates: 3/27/2002-3/30/2002 USCGC HEALY WAGB-20 Final Report Inc. Ocean Surveyor 75 khz Prepared by: Ron Hippe Commissioning Dates: 3/27/2002-3/30/2002 This report outlines the tests performed, and the results of Harbor and Sea testing

More information

Surface Tracking Feature

Surface Tracking Feature TELEDYNE RD INSTRUM ENTS A Teledyne Technologies Company Application Note FSA-022 (June 2008) Surface Tracking Feature 1 Introduction The following Application Note serves as a guide of how to use the

More information

High Ping Rate Profile Water Mode 12

High Ping Rate Profile Water Mode 12 Application Note FSA-014 (October 2008) Revised October 2008 High Ping Rate Profile Water Mode 12 Introduction Water Mode 12 is the result of the continued evolution of the signal processing within our

More information

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004 Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004 INTRODUCTION Sontek/YSI has introduced new firmware and software for their RiverSurveyor product line. Firmware changes

More information

BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area.

BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area. BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area. by Igor Kazantsev Haflidi Haflidason Asgeir Steinsland Introduction

More information

FIG: 27.1 Tool String

FIG: 27.1 Tool String Bring up Radioactive Tracer service. Click Acquisition Box - Edit - Tool String Edit the tool string as necessary to reflect the tool string being run. This is important to insure proper offsets, filters,

More information

TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study

TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study By Randolph Kashino, Axys Technologies Inc. Tony Ethier, Axys Technologies Inc. Reo Phillips, Axys Technologies Inc. February 2 Figure 1. Nortek

More information

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters David M. Farmer Graduate School of Oceanography (educational) University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02882 phone: (401) 874-6222

More information

ADCP data ranges from Oceanus and Wecoma Jules Hummon July 9, 2013 DRAFT

ADCP data ranges from Oceanus and Wecoma Jules Hummon July 9, 2013 DRAFT ADCP data ranges from Oceanus and Wecoma Jules Hummon July 9, 2013 DRAFT ADCP and Wind data from two UNOLS Intermediate Class vessels were examined to try to get some idea of typical ADCP range on these

More information

14/10/2013' Bathymetric Survey. egm502 seafloor mapping

14/10/2013' Bathymetric Survey. egm502 seafloor mapping egm502 seafloor mapping lecture 10 single-beam echo-sounders Bathymetric Survey Bathymetry is the measurement of water depths - bathymetry is the underwater equivalent of terrestrial topography. A transect

More information

Overview. 2 Module 13: Advanced Data Processing

Overview. 2 Module 13: Advanced Data Processing 2 Module 13: Advanced Data Processing Overview This section of the course covers advanced data processing when profiling. We will discuss the removal of the fairly gross effects of ship heave and talk

More information

from ocean to cloud PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM

from ocean to cloud PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM PARAMETRIC SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER, A NEW APPROACH FOR AN OLD PROBLEM Geoff Holland, Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks Geoff.holland@alcatel-lucent.com Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks Ltd, Christchurch Way,

More information

Measuring Discharge in Shallower Rivers: ADCPs go from Rio to Pro

Measuring Discharge in Shallower Rivers: ADCPs go from Rio to Pro Measuring Discharge in Shallower Rivers: ADCPs go from Rio to Pro River monitoring supports many different activities from determining water reserves to designing flood defenses, and even to sports / leisure

More information

Meeting the Challenges of the IHO and LINZ Special Order Object Detection Requirements

Meeting the Challenges of the IHO and LINZ Special Order Object Detection Requirements Meeting the Challenges of the IHO and LINZ Special Order Object Detection Requirements Erik Hammerstad Kongsberg Maritime P. O. Box 111, N-3191 Horten, Norway erik.oscar.hammerstad@kongsberg.com Abstract

More information

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling Naval Research Laboratory Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-5004 NRL/MR/7182--08-9100 Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling J. Paquin Fabre Acoustic Simulation, Measurements,

More information

Wärtsilä ELAC VE 5900

Wärtsilä ELAC VE 5900 Wärtsilä ELAC VE 5900 Naval echo sounder system for surface vessels The high-end naval echo sounder system Wärtsilä ELAC VE 5900 is especially designed to meet the requirements of modern surface combatant.

More information

Completion of Hydrometric Survey Notes (HSN)

Completion of Hydrometric Survey Notes (HSN) Completion of Hydrometric Survey Notes (HSN) Hydrometric Survey Notes provide a place to record results and applied proper procedures for tasks undertaken in the field, such as levelling, measurements,

More information

MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title:

MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title: MAPCO2 Buoy Metadata Report Project Title: Autonomous Multi-parameter Measurements from a Drifting Buoy During the SO GasEx Experiment Funding Agency: NOAA Global Carbon Cycle program PI(s): Christopher

More information

Using Acoustic Windows

Using Acoustic Windows RD Instruments Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers Using Acoustic Windows Application Note FSA-010 (December 2002) Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 2 1.1 Background - Should I use an Acoustic Window?...

More information

MIL-STD-883G METHOD

MIL-STD-883G METHOD STEADY-STATE LIFE 1. PURPOSE. The steady-state life test is performed for the purpose of demonstrating the quality or reliability of devices subjected to the specified conditions over an extended time

More information

RAMSTM. 360 Riser and Anchor-Chain Integrity Monitoring for FPSOs

RAMSTM. 360 Riser and Anchor-Chain Integrity Monitoring for FPSOs RAMS 360 Riser and Anchor-Chain Integrity Monitoring for FPSOs Introduction to RAMS Tritech s RAMS is a 360 anchor-chain and riser integrity monitoring system for Floating Production Storage and Offloading

More information

CONSTRUCTION OF LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL ON THE SAINT LAWRENCE TIDAL CURRENT CONDITIONS IN THE LEVIS AREA

CONSTRUCTION OF LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL ON THE SAINT LAWRENCE TIDAL CURRENT CONDITIONS IN THE LEVIS AREA RABASKA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OF LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL ON THE SAINT LAWRENCE TIDAL CURRENT CONDITIONS IN THE LEVIS AREA FINAL REPORT MARCH 2006 N/Réf. : 24237.360 3075, ch. des Quatre-Bourgeois Sainte-Foy

More information

INTRODUCTION TO NETWORK WIND 3 MOUNTING THE UNIT 14 SELECTING THE DISPLAY MODE 5 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS 17

INTRODUCTION TO NETWORK WIND 3 MOUNTING THE UNIT 14 SELECTING THE DISPLAY MODE 5 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS 17 CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 INSTALLATION 14 GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO B&G NETWORK 2 SITING THE UNIT 14 INTRODUCTION TO NETWORK WIND 3 MOUNTING THE UNIT 14 EXAMPLE SYSTEMS USING NETWORK WIND 4 SPECIFICATION 16 SELECTING

More information

HYDROGRAPHIC AND SITE SURVEY REPORT

HYDROGRAPHIC AND SITE SURVEY REPORT HYDROGRAPHIC AND SITE SURVEY REPORT Proposed Pen Site at Dounie, Sound of Jura Prepared for: Kames Fish Farming Ltd Kilmelford Argyll PA34 4XA Tel: +44 (0)1631 720699 TransTech Limited www.transtechltd.com

More information

AN31E Application Note

AN31E Application Note Balancing Theory Aim of balancing How an unbalance evolves An unbalance exists when the principle mass axis of a rotating body, the so-called axis of inertia, does not coincide with the rotational axis.

More information

Tutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3

Tutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3 Tutorial for the Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3 May, 2011 1. Introduction The Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3 has been designed to facilitate a determination

More information

WinRiver II User s Guide

WinRiver II User s Guide WinRiver II User s Guide P/N 957-6231-00 (April 2008) Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 How to Contact Teledyne RD Instruments...1 1.2 Conventions Used in this Guide...2 1.3 Software Requirements...2

More information

Autopilot setup. VRF (Virtual Rudder Feedback) calibration. Software setup NSS evo2 Installation Manual

Autopilot setup. VRF (Virtual Rudder Feedback) calibration. Software setup NSS evo2 Installation Manual Autopilot setup Verifying the autopilot connection When an AC12N, AC42N, or SG05 is connected to the NSS evo2 system, the NSS evo2 will automatically detect the autopilot and an Autopilot menu icon will

More information

BathySurvey A Trimble Access hydrographic survey module

BathySurvey A Trimble Access hydrographic survey module BathySurvey A Trimble Access hydrographic survey module Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Installation... 4 3. Main Screen... 5 4. Device... 6 5. Jobs... 7 6. Settings Odom Echotrac... 8 7. Settings Ohmex

More information

R/V Bat Galim EM302 & EM2040 Multibeam Echosounder System Review January 31 February 4, 2016

R/V Bat Galim EM302 & EM2040 Multibeam Echosounder System Review January 31 February 4, 2016 R/V Bat Galim EM302 & EM2040 Multibeam Echosounder System Review January 31 February 4, 2016 Report prepared by: Paul D. Johnson University of New Hampshire Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping / Joint

More information

Deploying the TCM-1 Tilt Current Meter in an Inverted (Hanging) Orientation By: Nick Lowell, Founder & President

Deploying the TCM-1 Tilt Current Meter in an Inverted (Hanging) Orientation By: Nick Lowell, Founder & President Lowell Instruments Application Note #TCMA Deploying the TCM-1 Tilt Current Meter in an Inverted (Hanging) Orientation By: Nick Lowell, Founder & President 1 Introduction The TCM-1 Tilt Current Meter (TCM)

More information

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 9-10, 2012 Design and Control Session Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels By Bradley Deghuee L-3 Communications 1 Introduction Specialized

More information

Evaluation of the Klein HydroChart 3500 Interferometric Bathymetry Sonar for NOAA Sea Floor Mapping

Evaluation of the Klein HydroChart 3500 Interferometric Bathymetry Sonar for NOAA Sea Floor Mapping Evaluation of the Klein HydroChart 3500 Interferometric Bathymetry Sonar for NOAA Sea Floor Mapping Yuhui Ai, Straud Armstrong and Dean Fleury L-3 Communications Klein Associates, Inc. 11 Klein Dr. Salem,

More information

Nortek Technical Note No.: TN-021. Chesapeake Bay AWAC Evaluation

Nortek Technical Note No.: TN-021. Chesapeake Bay AWAC Evaluation Nortek Technical Note No.: TN-021 Title: Chesapeake Bay AWAC Evaluation Last Edited: October 5, 2004 Authors: Eric Siegel-NortekUSA, Chris Malzone-NortekUSA, Torstein Pedersen- Number of Pages: 12 Chesapeake

More information

ICES Guidelines for Multibeam Echosounder Data (Compiled September 2006)

ICES Guidelines for Multibeam Echosounder Data (Compiled September 2006) ICES Guidelines for Multibeam Echosounder Data (Compiled September 2006) If you are considering producing a hydrographic survey please read the following information first. Your survey could be used to

More information

PART 5 - OPTIONS CONTENTS 5.1 SYSTEM EXPANSION 5-3

PART 5 - OPTIONS CONTENTS 5.1 SYSTEM EXPANSION 5-3 PART 5 - OPTIONS CONTENTS Para Page 5.1 SYSTEM EXPANSION 5-3 5.2 SENSORS 5-3 5.2.1 Trim Angle Sensor 5-3 5.2.2 Mast Rotation Sensor 5-3 5.2.3 Heel Angle Sensor 5-3 5.2.4 Barometric Pressure Sensor 5-3

More information

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling Images at Depth: The Use of Acoustic Imaging on Large River Crossings A Case Study AGENDA Background of project Review of

More information

Echo Sounder Evaluation of XBT Drop Rate off the coast of Florida

Echo Sounder Evaluation of XBT Drop Rate off the coast of Florida Echo Sounder Evaluation of XBT Drop Rate off the coast of Florida Lockheed Martin Sippican Grant Johnson Engineering Project Manager Ocean Products 9/22/2010 1 Introduction New fall rate evaluation approach

More information

IEP SENSOR BRACKET CHECKOUT AND VERIFICATION. This is a non-hazardous test.

IEP SENSOR BRACKET CHECKOUT AND VERIFICATION. This is a non-hazardous test. Page 1 of 20 NEXT GENERATION GAS SYSTEM (NGGS ) IEP SENSOR BRACKET CHECKOUT AND VERIFICATION PROCEDURE 870-PROC-623 Revision A Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 FEBRUARY 13, 2002 This

More information

WMB-160F Multi-beam Fishing System

WMB-160F Multi-beam Fishing System WMB-160F Multi-beam Fishing System Take away the guess work and see what s REALLY below your boat! Seven Systems in One 2 WMB-160F WMB-160F Screen Shots The WMB-160F is a multi-beam sonar that has been

More information

The Evolution of an Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel and Software for Hydrographic Survey

The Evolution of an Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel and Software for Hydrographic Survey The Evolution of an Autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel and Software for Hydrographic Survey Paul Donaldson In 2017, Leidos, Inc. participated in both the Gulf of Mexico Unmanned Systems Operational Demonstration

More information

Data Collection and Processing: Elwha Estuary Survey, February 2013

Data Collection and Processing: Elwha Estuary Survey, February 2013 Data Collection and Processing: Elwha Estuary Survey, February 2013 Ian Miller, WA Sea Grant Olympic Peninsula Field Office, 1502 E. Lauridsen Blvd #82, Port Angeles, WA 98362 immiller@u.washington.edu

More information

Release Performance Notes TN WBMS _R _Release_Presentation.pptx 22 September, 2014

Release Performance Notes TN WBMS _R _Release_Presentation.pptx 22 September, 2014 TN-140079-1.2 WBMS _R2014-06_Release_Presentation.pptx 22 September, 2014 Since the 2013-12 release, NORBIT has made tremendous improvements to both the functionality and performance of the WBMS systems.

More information

FLUORESCENCE DETERMINATION OF OXYGEN

FLUORESCENCE DETERMINATION OF OXYGEN FLUORESCENCE DETERMINATION OF OXYGEN Objectives This experiment will familiarize the students with the principles of fluorescence quenching as well as the Ocean Optics FOXY Fiber Optic Sensor System. Spectra

More information

RSKtools for Matlab processing RBR data

RSKtools for Matlab processing RBR data Table of Contents Introduction... 1 RSKtools help... 1 Getting set up... 1 Remove atmospheric pressure from measured total pressure... 2 Correct for A2D zero-order hold... 2 Low-pass filtering... 3 Alignment

More information

Title: Standard Operating Procedure for Dasibi Model 5008 Gas Dilution Calibrator

Title: Standard Operating Procedure for Dasibi Model 5008 Gas Dilution Calibrator Procedure No: SOP-034 Revision No: 1.0 Revised Dec. 29, 2010 Page No.: 1 of 10 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE This procedure is intended to describe the operations of the Dasibi model 5008 calibrator. The Dasibi

More information

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration M. Burak Şamşul ITU AYOC 2014 - Milper Pervane Teknolojileri Company Profile MILPER is established in 2011 as a Research and Development

More information

SOP-003 GYRO CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION PROCEDURE

SOP-003 GYRO CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION PROCEDURE Rev No. Issue Description Prepared Reviewed Approved Date 5 Re-issued for use RGM SS RB 17 Aug 15 4 Changes made to procedure AFI JAL JAL 12 Sep 11 3 Re-issued for use RGM RAM MAJ 19 May 11 2 Re-issued

More information

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters David M. Farmer Graduate School of Oceanography (educational) University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02882 Phone: (401) 874-6222

More information

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community,

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community, Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community, 2010 1 Holly A. Waterfield 2 and Mark Cornwell 3 INTRODUCTION Hydroacoustic surveys were conducted in May and November 2010 to estimate pelagic

More information

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay M. Fossati, D. Bellón, E. Lorenzo & I. Piedra-Cueva Fluid Mechanics and Environmental Engineering Institute (IMFIA), School of Engineering, Research

More information

WHOTS Mooring Subsurface Instrumentation

WHOTS Mooring Subsurface Instrumentation UH Contributions to WHOTS-13 Cruise Report by Fernando Santiago-Mandujano, Daniel McCoy, Jefrey Snyder, R. Walter Deppe, Kellen Rosburg, Glenn Carter, Katrina Berry, and Roger Lukas WHOTS Mooring Subsurface

More information

DQM Annual Hopper QA Checks

DQM Annual Hopper QA Checks DQM Annual Hopper QA Checks The following document is intended to be a guide for conducting annual Dredge Quality Management quality assurance checks on hopper dredges. The procedures should provide general

More information

ICE LOADS MONITORING SYSTEMS

ICE LOADS MONITORING SYSTEMS Guide for Ice Loads Monitoring Systems GUIDE FOR ICE LOADS MONITORING SYSTEMS MAY 2011 American Bureau of Shipping Incorporated by Act of Legislature of the State of New York 1862 Copyright 2011 American

More information

DP Ice Model Test of Arctic Drillship

DP Ice Model Test of Arctic Drillship Author s Name Name of the Paper Session DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 11-12, 211 ICE TESTING SESSION DP Ice Model Test of Arctic Drillship Torbjørn Hals Kongsberg Maritime, Kongsberg, Norway Fredrik

More information

Recommended operating guidelines (ROG) for sidescan Sidescan sonar ROG in wrapper.doc English Number of pages: 9 Summary:

Recommended operating guidelines (ROG) for sidescan Sidescan sonar ROG in wrapper.doc English Number of pages: 9 Summary: Title: Author(s): Document owner: Recommended operating guidelines (ROG) for sidescan sonar Dave Long (BGS) Dave Long (BGS) Reviewed by: Janine Guinan (MI) 07/09/07 Workgroup: MESH action: 2.1 Version:

More information

Naval Postgraduate School, Operational Oceanography and Meteorology. Since inputs from UDAS are continuously used in projects at the Naval

Naval Postgraduate School, Operational Oceanography and Meteorology. Since inputs from UDAS are continuously used in projects at the Naval How Accurate are UDAS True Winds? Charles L Williams, LT USN September 5, 2006 Naval Postgraduate School, Operational Oceanography and Meteorology Abstract Since inputs from UDAS are continuously used

More information

Columbia River Plume 2006 OSU Ocean Mixing Nash, Kilcher, Moum et al. CR05 Cruise Report (RISE Pt. Sur, May )

Columbia River Plume 2006 OSU Ocean Mixing Nash, Kilcher, Moum et al. CR05 Cruise Report (RISE Pt. Sur, May ) CR05 Cruise Report (RISE Pt. Sur, May 21-31 2006) Group Summary: Participants: Pt. Sur Ocean Mixing Group: Jonathan Nash, Levi Kilcher, Alexander Perlin, Greg Avicola; Pt. Sur UW: Emily Spahn (Alex Horner-Devine;

More information

Measured broadband reverberation characteristics in Deep Ocean. [E.Mail: ]

Measured broadband reverberation characteristics in Deep Ocean. [E.Mail: ] Measured broadband reverberation characteristics in Deep Ocean Baiju M Nair, M Padmanabham and M P Ajaikumar Naval Physical and Oceanographic Laboratory, Kochi-682 021, India [E.Mail: ] Received ; revised

More information

ACV-10 Automatic Control Valve

ACV-10 Automatic Control Valve ACV-10 Automatic Control Valve Installation, Operation & Maintenance General: The Archer Instruments ACV-10 is a precision automatic feed rate control valve for use in vacuum systems feeding Chlorine,

More information

The Wave Glider: A Mobile Buoy Concept for Ocean Science. 009 Liquid Robotics Inc.

The Wave Glider: A Mobile Buoy Concept for Ocean Science. 009 Liquid Robotics Inc. The Wave Glider: A Mobile Buoy Concept for Ocean Science 009 Liquid Robotics Inc. J. Manley & T. Richardson: Liquid Robotics Inc. DBCP XXV Paris September 28, 2009 1 Wave Glider Overview Unique Two Part

More information

The benefits of the extended diagnostics feature. Compact, well-proven, and flexible

The benefits of the extended diagnostics feature. Compact, well-proven, and flexible ABB MEASUREMENT & ANALYTICS TECHNICAL INFORMATION PositionMaster EDP300 Extended Diagnostics Compact, well-proven, and flexible The benefits of the extended diagnostics feature The PositionMaster EDP300

More information

SPEED LOGS & ECHO SOUNDERS

SPEED LOGS & ECHO SOUNDERS SPEED LOGS & ECHO SOUNDERS SIMPLIFYING INSTALLATION AND MINIMIZING COST When Safety Matters TAKING SAFETY SERIOUSLY IS OUR DRIVING FORCE. Consilium is a well established company within the marine industry,

More information

SPEED LOGS & ECHO SOUNDERS

SPEED LOGS & ECHO SOUNDERS SPEED LOGS & ECHO SOUNDERS SIMPLIFYING INSTALLATION AND MINIMIZING COST When Safety Matters TAKING SAFETY SERIOUSLY IS OUR DRIVING FORCE. Consilium is a well established company within the marine industry,

More information

I. Ostrovskyet al., 2008

I. Ostrovskyet al., 2008 I. Ostrovskyet al., 2008 1 Outline Background Materials and procedures Results and Discussion Conclusion 2 Background The emission of highly potent greenhouse gases has contributed to the increased atmospheric

More information

BLEED DOWN OF THE HIGH GMA PRESSURE

BLEED DOWN OF THE HIGH GMA PRESSURE SU/GP-B STANFORD UNIVERSITY W.W. HANSEN EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS LABORATORY GRAVITY PROBE B, RELATIVITY GYROSCOPE EXPERIMENT STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305-4085 BLEED DOWN OF THE HIGH GMA PRESSURE GP-B ENGINEERING

More information

UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO

UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO Department of Chemical Engineering ChE 524 Process Control Laboratory Instruction Manual January, 2001 Revised: May, 2009 1 Experiment # 2 - Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Experimental

More information

Continuous Gas Analysis In situ laser gas analyzers TÜV and MCERTS add-on for LDS 6 operating instructions Compact Operating Instructions

Continuous Gas Analysis In situ laser gas analyzers TÜV and MCERTS add-on for LDS 6 operating instructions Compact Operating Instructions Continuous Gas Analysis In situ laser gas analyzers Compact Operating Instructions 1 LDS 6 TÜV/MCERTS certified analyzers for NH3/H2O, NH3 and H2O 1.1 Operation requirements Please observe the following:

More information

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GREAT OUSE AND 100 FT DRAIN QUARTERLY BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 SITE SURVEY REPORT NO. H6787

ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GREAT OUSE AND 100 FT DRAIN QUARTERLY BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 SITE SURVEY REPORT NO. H6787 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GREAT OUSE AND 100FT DRAIN QUARTERLY BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 NO. H6787 LONGDIN & BROWNING (SURVEYS) LIMITED CHERRY TREE HOUSE CARMARTHEN ROAD SWANSEA SA1 1HE H6787 1 Measured

More information

Cover Page for Lab Report Group Portion. Pump Performance

Cover Page for Lab Report Group Portion. Pump Performance Cover Page for Lab Report Group Portion Pump Performance Prepared by Professor J. M. Cimbala, Penn State University Latest revision: 02 March 2012 Name 1: Name 2: Name 3: [Name 4: ] Date: Section number:

More information

REACTOR 40 MECHANICAL Configuration Guide

REACTOR 40 MECHANICAL Configuration Guide REACTOR 40 MECHANICAL Configuration Guide Important Safety Information WARNING See the Important Safety and Product Information guide in the product box for product warnings and other important information.

More information

Next Generation Quartz Pressure Gauges

Next Generation Quartz Pressure Gauges Next Generation Quartz Pressure Gauges Rick Puccio, Ph.D. Senior Scientist Quartzdyne Houston, TX March 2, 2016 Outline Quartz Pressure Gauge Introduction Gauge Size Reduction Long Term Pressure Drift

More information

Shallow Water Bathymetry using the REMUS 100 Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

Shallow Water Bathymetry using the REMUS 100 Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Shallow Water Bathymetry using the REMUS 100 Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Michael Bell Maritime Division Defence Science and Technology Organisation DSTO-TR-2916 ABSTRACT This report describes assessments

More information

CORRELATION BETWEEN SONAR ECHOES AND SEA BOTTOM TOPOGRAPHY

CORRELATION BETWEEN SONAR ECHOES AND SEA BOTTOM TOPOGRAPHY CORRELATION BETWEEN SONAR ECHOES AND SEA BOTTOM TOPOGRAPHY JON WEGGE Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI), PO Box 115, NO-3191 Horten, Norway E-mail: jon.wegge@ffi.no False alarms resulting from

More information

EZ Boom 2010 System for the EZ Guide 500 Lightbar Triangle Ag Services Users Guide

EZ Boom 2010 System for the EZ Guide 500 Lightbar Triangle Ag Services Users Guide EZ Boom 2010 System for the EZ Guide 500 Lightbar Triangle Ag Services Users Guide Parts of the Controller (For details on the parts of the EZ Boom controller refer to Appendix F) Status Indicator Rate

More information

NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTION

NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COLLECTION 305 West Grand Avenue, Suite 300 Montvale, New Jersey 07645 Phone 201.930.9890 Fax 201.930.9805 www.anchorqea.com M EMORANDUM To: Caroline Kwan and Nica Klaber U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region

More information

Interim Operating Procedures for SonTek RiverSurveyor M9/S5

Interim Operating Procedures for SonTek RiverSurveyor M9/S5 Hydroacoustics Technical Working Group: Task 2.3 Fully operationalize auto-adapting ADCPs Interim Operating Procedures for SonTek RiverSurveyor M9/S5 P Campbell, E. Jamieson, F Rainville, A Du Cap, 2014

More information

Application for Consent to Conduct Marine Scientific Research. F Internal Waves in Straits (IWISE) Institution Contact Information Director

Application for Consent to Conduct Marine Scientific Research. F Internal Waves in Straits (IWISE) Institution Contact Information Director 1. General Information 1.1 Reference ID: Application for Consent to Conduct Marine Scientific Research Application number: Project name: F2010-111 Internal Waves in Straits (IWISE) 1.2 Sponsoring institution(s):

More information

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN: IMAVSBA WARFARE CENTERS NEWPORT DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: 401 832-3653 FAX: 401 832-4432 DSN: 432-3653 Attorney Docket No. 85031 Date:

More information

INTERNAL LEAKAGE CHECK OF THE FLIGHT GMA

INTERNAL LEAKAGE CHECK OF THE FLIGHT GMA SU/GP-B P0931 Rev A STANFORD UNIVERSITY W.W. HANSEN EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS LABORATORY GRAVITY PROBE B, RELATIVITY GYROSCOPE EXPERIMENT STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305-4085 INTERNAL LEAKAGE CHECK OF THE FLIGHT

More information

R/V Kilo Moana EM122 Multibeam Echosounder Review KM August 9-13, 2015

R/V Kilo Moana EM122 Multibeam Echosounder Review KM August 9-13, 2015 R/V Kilo Moana EM122 Multibeam Echosounder Review KM1514 - August 9-13, 2015 Report prepared by: Paul Johnson and Kevin Jerram University of New Hampshire Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping/Joint Hydrographic

More information

JAPANESE PD EXAMINATIONS FOR DEPTH SIZING OF SCC IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL PIPES FROM 2006 TO 2012

JAPANESE PD EXAMINATIONS FOR DEPTH SIZING OF SCC IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL PIPES FROM 2006 TO 2012 JAPANESE PD EXAMINATIONS FOR DEPTH SIZING OF SCC IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL PIPES FROM 2006 TO 2012 Keiji Watanabe, Hajime Shohji, and Koichiro Hide PD center, Central Research Institute of Electric

More information

R/V Sikuliaq EM302 & EM710 Multibeam Echosounder System Shipboard Acceptance Tests - SKQ201400L3 August 9 18, 2014

R/V Sikuliaq EM302 & EM710 Multibeam Echosounder System Shipboard Acceptance Tests - SKQ201400L3 August 9 18, 2014 R/V Sikuliaq EM302 & EM710 Multibeam Echosounder System Shipboard Acceptance Tests - SKQ201400L3 August 9 18, 2014 Report prepared by: Paul Johnson and Ashton Flinders University of New Hampshire Center

More information

Remote Control Bait Boat

Remote Control Bait Boat CARPIO 2.0 User Manual All pictures shown are for illustration purpose only. Actual product may vary due to product enhancement Remote Control Bait Boat (Smart Remote Control at 868 MHz) 1 Table of Contents

More information

Streamer Hydrophone Operation Manual

Streamer Hydrophone Operation Manual Streamer Hydrophone Operation Manual Revision History Issue Change No. 1 1461 Reason for change Update manual with PMX561 MSDS and the removal of the DC561 MSDS. Manual document number revised (previously

More information

BAPI Pressure Line of Products - FAQs

BAPI Pressure Line of Products - FAQs Table of Contents 1. Several manufacturers produce pressure transmitters, why should I purchase from BAPI?... p. 2 2. BAPI makes several styles of pressure transmitters. What are the features of each?...

More information

Trim and Stabilisation systems NEXT GENERATION IN BOAT CONTROL.

Trim and Stabilisation systems NEXT GENERATION IN BOAT CONTROL. Trim and Stabilisation systems NEXT GENERATION IN BOAT CONTROL www.humphree.com WHEN EFFICIENCY AND PERFORMANCE REALLY MATTERS! Humphree proudly presents the new HCS-5 The HCS-5 combines exceptional mechanical

More information

Appendix 5: Currents in Minas Basin. (Oceans Ltd. 2009)

Appendix 5: Currents in Minas Basin. (Oceans Ltd. 2009) Appendix 5: Currents in Minas Basin (Oceans Ltd. 29) Current in Minas Basin May 1, 28 March 29, 29 Submitted To: Minas Basin Pulp and Power P.O. Box 41 53 Prince Street Hansport, NS, BP 1P by 22, Purdy

More information

Robin J. Beaman. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.

Robin J. Beaman. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia. Robin J. Beaman School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia. Email: robin.beaman@jcu.edu.au Seminar to SSSI Qld Hydrography Coping with Nature, Brisbane,

More information

500 Series Operations Manual _A

500 Series Operations Manual _A 500 Series Operations Manual 531521-1_A Thank You! Thank you for choosing Humminbird, America's #1 name in fishfinders. Humminbird has built its reputation by designing and manufacturing topquality, thoroughly

More information

TASK BOOK REPORT FORM

TASK BOOK REPORT FORM TASK BOOK REPORT FORM Trainee DPO Details: Name: of birth: CoC Number: NI Logbook No.: Mobile phone: E-mail: Vessel 1 Details: Vessel: DP System: joined: Left: Vessel 2 Details: Vessel: DP System: joined:

More information

MP15 Jockey Pump Controller

MP15 Jockey Pump Controller Setup and Operating Instructions MP15 Jockey Pump Controller This manual provides general information, installation, operation, maintenance, and system setup information for Metron Model MP15 Jockey Pump

More information

PositionMaster EDP300 Extended Diagnostics. Compact, well-proven, and flexible

PositionMaster EDP300 Extended Diagnostics. Compact, well-proven, and flexible Change from one to two columns Technical Information TI/EDP300_ED-EN Rev. A PositionMaster EDP300 Extended Diagnostics Compact, well-proven, and flexible The benefits of the extended diagnostics feature

More information

2600T Series Pressure Transmitters Plugged Impulse Line Detection Diagnostic. Pressure Measurement Engineered solutions for all applications

2600T Series Pressure Transmitters Plugged Impulse Line Detection Diagnostic. Pressure Measurement Engineered solutions for all applications Application Description AG/266PILD-EN Rev. C 2600T Series Pressure Transmitters Plugged Impulse Line Detection Diagnostic Pressure Measurement Engineered solutions for all applications Increase plant productivity

More information

BOTTOM HINGED FLOOD BARRIER

BOTTOM HINGED FLOOD BARRIER BOTTOM HINGED FLOOD BARRIER Installation Instructions/Operation and Maintenance Manual Models: BH-590 Contact Information Table of Contents: Safety Precautions... 2 Product Information... 2 Manual Deployment

More information

Reliability engineering is the study of the causes, distribution and prediction of failure.

Reliability engineering is the study of the causes, distribution and prediction of failure. Reliability engineering: Reliability is the probability that a system or component will perform without failure for a specified period of time under specified operating conditions. Reliability engineering

More information

frequently asked questions

frequently asked questions Hydra Pilot Fault Codes What do the fault codes for the Hydra Pilot mean? Fault Cause FAULT 100 FAULT 101 FAULT 102 FAULT 103 FAULT 104 FAULT 105 FAULT 106 FAULT 108 FAULT 109 FAULT 110 FAULT 111 FAULT

More information

Built-in Purge Control Functions

Built-in Purge Control Functions Built-in Purge Control Functions Why clean a sensor? As the velocity sensor was calibrated clean, operating it clean also preserves the best calibration. Any build up of material on a thermal sensor tends

More information

Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry. Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014

Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry. Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014 Challenges in determining water surface in airborne LiDAR topobathymetry Amar Nayegandhi, Dewberry 15 th Annual JALBTCX Workshop, June 11 th 2014 Why topobathy LiDAR? Complements acoustic (multi-beam sonar)

More information

STD-3-V1M4_1.7.1_AND_ /15/2015 page 1 of 6. TNI Standard. EL-V1M4 Sections and September 2015

STD-3-V1M4_1.7.1_AND_ /15/2015 page 1 of 6. TNI Standard. EL-V1M4 Sections and September 2015 page 1 of 6 TNI Standard EL-V1M4 Sections 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 September 2015 Description This TNI Standard has been taken through all of the voting stages and has received consensus approval by the TNI membership.

More information