IOTA CAROL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Transcription

1 IOTA CAROL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS December 28, 215 Revised January 29, 216 Revised February 23, 216

2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Iota Carol PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL Prepared for: Iota Carol, LLC Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. West Palm Beach, Florida 1419 December 28, 215 January 29, 216 February 23, 216 CA 696 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Suite Wekiva Way West Palm Beach, Florida / TEL Christopher W. Heggen, P.E. Florida Registration Number 58636

3 Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 SHORT-TERM (YEAR 22) ANALYSIS...4 Trip Generation...4 Traffic Distribution and Assignment...5 Radius of Development Influence...5 Test 2 (5-Year Buildout) Level of Service Analysis...7 LONG-TERM (YEAR 24) ANALYSIS...13 Trip Generation...13 Traffic Distribution and Assignment...14 Radius of Development Influence...15 Long-Range Level of Service Analysis...17 CONCLUSION...19 APPENDIX A: PCN SHEETS APPENDIX B: TPS OUTPUT WORKSHEETS APPENDIX C: INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D: YEAR 24 MPO MODEL VOLUME OUTPUT DATA APPENDIX E: DATA FROM OTHER APPROVED / PENDING PROJECTS (MINTO WEST, AVENIR, INDIAN TRAILS GROVE) APPENDIX F: PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE-YEAR ROAD PROGRAM k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page i

4 Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Maximum Development Intensities Summary...2 Table 2: Trip Generation Potential: 5-Year Horizon...4 Table 3A: Test 2 (Year 22) Significance Analysis: AM Peak Hour...9 Table 3B: Test 2 (Year 22) Significance Analysis: PM Peak Hour...1 Table 4: Test 2 (Year 22) LOS Analysis Table 5: Trip Generation Potential: Long-Term Horizon...14 Table 6: Long-Term (Year 24) LOS Analysis...18 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location...3 Figure 2: Short-Term (Year 22) Project Trip Distribution...6 Figure 3: Long-Term (Year 24) Project Trip Distribution...16 k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page ii

5 Traffic Impact Analysis INTRODUCTION Kimley-Horn has prepared a future land use plan amendment traffic analysis for the Iota Carol site located north of 6 th Street west of 19 th Street in unincorporated Palm Beach County, Florida. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the project site. Iota Carol is made up of three parcels, which currently have the Future Land Use (FLU) designation of RR-1. This application is being filed to amend the Future Land Use plan to adopt a designation of RR-1.25 for the project site. The Parcel Control Numbers (PCNs) for the site are listed below: Based on the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan, the RR-1 designation allows a maximum density of 1 residential unit per 1 acres. The RR-1.25 designation would allow a maximum density of 1 residential units per 1.25 acres. In addition, commercial and civic development are proposed for the site. Table 1 summarizes the maximum development intensities assumed for the parcel based upon the existing and proposed FLU designations. k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 1

6 Traffic Impact Analysis Table 1 Maximum Development Intensities Scenario Acreage Maximum Intensity Existing FLU Maximum Development Potential RR-1 1, acres 1 unit / 1 acres 129 D.U. Proposed FLU RR , acres 1 unit /1.25 acres 1,3 D.U. Commercial Civic 112, S.F. 112,123 S.F. This report summarizes the findings of the analysis that was conducted for the short-term and long-term planning horizons based upon the criteria identified in Policy 3.5d of the Future Land Use Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 2

7 SITE LEGEND SITE FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION IOTA CAROL 1419

8 Traffic Impact Analysis SHORT-TERM (YEAR 22) ANALYSIS A short term analysis was conducted to evaluate anticipated conditions in Year 22. Because full buildout of the project will take longer than this five-year planning horizon, this analysis includes an evaluation of the impacts of development of 5 dwelling units (or the trip equivalent thereof) for the site. This analysis has been conducted using the methodology for the Test 2 Level of Service Analyses as defined in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code. Trip Generation The trip generation calculations are based on the trip generation rates published by Palm Beach County. Because the site is currently agricultural use, no credit for existing site traffic was assumed in this analysis. For the future (five-year planning horizon) analysis, a development potential of 5 dwelling units was assumed. As indicated in Table 2, the 5-year maximum development potential under the proposed FLU for this parcel is 5, new external daily trips, 375 new external AM peak-hour trips (94 in/281 out) and 447 new external PM peak-hour trips (282 in/165 out). Table 2 Trip Generation Potential Five-Year Horizon (Year 22) Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Total In Out Total In Out Proposed FLU Designation - 5 Year Horizon Gross Trips Single Family Detached 5 DU 5, Net New External Trips:5-Year Horizon 5, Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Trip Generation Single Family detached PBC = T = 1 * Units AM Peak Hour Trip Generation Single Family detached PBC = T =.75 * Units (25% in / 75% out) PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Single Family detached PBC = Ln(T) =.9 * Ln(Units)+.51 (63% in / 37% out) k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 4

9 Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic Distribution and Assignment Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the area. These trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways based upon a review of the roadway network proposed to be in place at the time of buildout and its travel time characteristics. The peak-hour trips for the project were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network proposed to be in place for the 22 analysis year. This assignment differs from the ultimate long-range assignment, which accounts for future roadway connections to be built. Figure 2 illustrates the project traffic assignment to the surrounding roadway network for the short-term (Year 22) analysis. Radius of Development Influence Based upon the thresholds published in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County ULDC, the radius of development influence for the peak hour volume of project traffic anticipated to be generated in the 5-year planning horizon timeframe (447 trips) is two miles. k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 5

10 25% 3% SITE 3% 25% 5% 7% 3% 35% XX% LEGEND SITE ROAD NETWORK PERCENT ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 2 FUTURE (22) PROJECT DISTRIBUTION IOTA CAROL 1419

11 Traffic Impact Analysis Test 2 (5-Year Buildout) Level of Service Analysis Significance was determined in accordance with the Test 2 (5-Year Analysis) LOS E peak-hour peak-directional service volumes defined in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code. The AM and PM peak hour project trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius in order to evaluate the project s impact in comparison to the LOS E adopted service volume. As defined in Article 12, Chapter B, Section 2(B), The existing road network and State and County Five-Year Road Program improvements with construction scheduled to commence before the end of the Five-Year Analysis Period shall be the Test 2 Road Network assumed in the analysis. Therefore, the following road improvements identified in the current Palm Beach County Five-Year Road Program have been included in this analysis: Northlake Boulevard, East of Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road to East of Hall Boulevard: Widening to 4 lanes (Construction in FY 217) Northlake Boulevard, East of Hall Boulevard to Coconut Boulevard: Widening to 4 lanes (Construction in FY 219) Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road: Orange Boulevard to South of Northlake Boulevard: Widening to 4/6 lanes (Construction in FY 217) Relevant excerpts from the Palm Beach County Five-Year Road Program have been included in Appendix F. Per Palm Beach County standards, roadway links inside the two-mile radius of development influence are anticipated to be significantly impacted if project traffic is equal to or greater than 3% of the LOS E service volume, and links outside of that radius are anticipated to be significantly impacted if project traffic is equal to or greater than 5% of the LOS E service volume. As indicated in Tables 3A and 3B, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively: AM Peak Hour Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Northbound, between Okeechobee Boulevard and Northlake Boulevard Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Southbound, between 6 th Street North and Okeechobee Boulevard k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 7

12 Traffic Impact Analysis Okeechobee Boulevard, Eastbound, between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and F Road PM Peak Hour Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Northbound, between Southern Boulevard and 6 th Street North Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road, Southbound, between Northlake Boulevard and Okeechobee Boulevard Okeechobee Boulevard, Westbound, between F Road and Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 8

13 Traffic Impact Analysis Table 3A Test 2 (Year 22) Significance Analysis (AM Peak Hour) Roadway From To Direction Year 22 Laneage Facility Classification Project Traffic % Assignment Peak Hour Inbound Outbound Trips Within Percent 2 Impact miles? AM PEAK HOUR Seminole Pratt Whitney Road Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 25% % Yes Yes SB 4LD Class I 1,96 25% % % Yes No Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 25% % Yes Yes SB 4LD Class I 1,96 25% % % Yes No Orange Boulevard 6th Street NB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 3% % Yes Yes SB 4LD Class I 1,96 3% % % Yes No 6th Street Persimmon Boulevard NB 2L Class I 88 7% % % Yes Yes SB 2L Class I 88 % 7% % Yes Yes Persimmon Boulevard Sycamore Drive NB 4LD Class I 1,96 7% % % Yes Yes SB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 7% % Yes Yes Sycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard NB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,7 7% % % Yes No SB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,7 % 7% % Yes Yes Okeechobee Boulevard Southern Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,96 35% % % No No SB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 35% 98 5.% No No Coconut Boulevard Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 2L Class I 88 % 1% % No No SB 2L Class I 88 1% % 9 1.2% No No Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 2L Class I 88 % 1% % No No SB 2L Class I 88 1% % 9 1.2% No No Northlake Boulevard Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road 14th Avenue EB 4LD Class I 196 % 25% % No No WB 4LD Class I % % % No No 14th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 196 % 25% % No No WB 4LD Class I % % % No No Coconut Boulevard Ibis Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 196 % 3% % No No WB 4LD Class I 196 3% % % No No Ibis Boulevard SR 7 EB 4LD Class I 196 % 3% % No No WB 4LD Class I 196 3% % % No No SR 7 Beeline Highway EB 4LD Uninterrupted 376 % 3% % No No WB 4LD Uninterrupted 376 3% % 28.74% No No Orange Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 14th avenue EB 2L Class I 88 % 5% % Yes No WB 2L Class I 88 5% % 5.57% Yes No 14th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 2L Class I 88 % 5% % No No WB 2L Class I 88 5% % 5.57% No No Coconut Boulevard 6th Street EB 2L Class I 88 % 5% % No No WB 2L Class I 88 5% % 5.57% No No Okeechobee Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,44 % 3% % No Yes WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,44 3% % % No No B Road F Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,44 % 3% % No Yes WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,44 3% % % No No LOS E Service Volume Significant Impact?? k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 9

14 Traffic Impact Analysis Table 3B Test 2 (Year 22) Significance Analysis (PM Peak Hour) Project Traffic Within Roadway LOS E Year 22 % Assignment Peak Percent 2 Significant Direction Facility Classification Service Laneage Hour Impact miles? Impact?? From To Volume Inbound Outbound Trips PM PEAK HOUR Seminole Pratt Whitney Road Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 25% % Yes No SB 4LD Class I 1,96 25% % % Yes Yes Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 25% % Yes No SB 4LD Class I 1,96 25% % % Yes Yes Orange Boulevard 6th Street NB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 3% % Yes No SB 4LD Class I 1,96 3% % % Yes Yes 6th Street Persimmon Boulevard NB 2L Class I 88 7% % % Yes Yes SB 2L Class I 88 % 7% % Yes Yes Persimmon Boulevard Sycamore Drive NB 4LD Class I 1,96 7% % % Yes Yes SB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 7% % Yes Yes Sycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard NB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,7 7% % % Yes Yes SB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,7 % 7% % Yes Yes Okeechobee Boulevard Southern Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1,96 35% % % No Yes SB 4LD Class I 1,96 % 35% % No No Coconut Boulevard Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 2L Class I 88 % 1% % No No SB 2L Class I 88 1% % % No No Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 2L Class I 88 % 1% % No No SB 2L Class I 88 1% % % No No Northlake Boulevard Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road 14th Avenue EB 4LD Class I 196 % 25% % No No WB 4LD Class I % % % No No 14th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 196 % 25% % No No WB 4LD Class I % % % No No Coconut Boulevard Ibis Boulevard EB 4LD Class I 196 % 3% % No No WB 4LD Class I 196 3% % % No No Ibis Boulevard SR 7 EB 4LD Class I 196 % 3% % No No WB 4LD Class I 196 3% % % No No SR 7 Beeline Highway EB 4LD Uninterrupted 376 % 3% % No No WB 4LD Uninterrupted 376 3% % % No No Orange Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 14th avenue EB 2L Class I 88 % 5% 8.91% Yes No WB 2L Class I 88 5% % % Yes No 14th Avenue Coconut Boulevard EB 2L Class I 88 % 5% 8.91% No No WB 2L Class I 88 5% % % No No Coconut Boulevard 6th Street EB 2L Class I 88 % 5% 8.91% No No WB 2L Class I 88 5% % % No No Okeechobee Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,44 % 3% % No No WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,44 3% % % No Yes B Road F Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1,44 % 3% % No No WB 2L Uninterrupted 1,44 3% % % No Yes k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 1

15 Traffic Impact Analysis Year 22 capacity analyses were then performed on roadway segments that were determined to be significantly impacted by project traffic. Background traffic was determined for all significantly impacted roadways by applying the higher of either a 1 percent annual growth rate plus committed development trips as indicated by the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) database or the historical growth rate for the impacted segment, compounded on an annual basis. In addition, traffic volumes from the Test 2 analysis for the currently pending Indian Trails Grove application have been added to the background traffic calculation. Project traffic was then added to determine future year 22 volumes. These total Year 22 volumes were then compared to the LOS E generalized service volumes for each significantly impacted roadway link. As indicated in Table 4, all significantly impacted roadways operate acceptably at LOS E or better. Therefore, no further analysis is required and the proposed change in the FLU meets the Test 2 requirements of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 11

16 Traffic Impact Analysis Table 4 Test 2 (Year 22) LOS Analyses Roadway From To LOS E 215 Indian Direction Year 22 Facility Classification Service Peak Committed Trails 1% Historical Historical Background Project Total Laneage Volume Hour Development Grove Growth Growth Growth Volume Peak Hour Volume Volume Traffic Rate Trips AM PEAK HOUR Seminole Pratt Whitney Road Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1, % Yes Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1, % Yes Orange Boulevard 6th Street NB 4LD Class I 1, % ,25 Yes 6th Street Persimmon Boulevard NB 4LD Class II 1, % ,495 Yes SB 4LD Class II 1, % ,614 Yes Persimmon Boulevard Sycamore Drive NB 4LD Class I 1, % ,495 Yes SB 4LD Class I 1, % ,614 Yes Sycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard SB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2, % ,764 Yes Okeechobee Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1, % Yes B Road F Road EB 2L Uninterrupted 1, % Yes PM PEAK HOUR Seminole Pratt Whitney Road Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard SB 4LD Class I 1, % Yes Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard SB 4LD Class I 1, % Yes Orange Boulevard 61st Street SB 4LD Class I 1, % ,343 Yes 6th Street Persimmon Boulevard NB 4LD Class II 1, % ,849 Yes SB 4LD Class II 1, % ,86 Yes Persimmon Boulevard Sycamore Drive NB 4LD Class I 1, % ,849 Yes SB 4LD Class I 1, % ,86 Yes Sycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard NB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2,7 1, % ,22 Yes SB 4LD Class I/Uninterrupted 2, % ,78 Yes Okeechobee Boulevard Southern Boulevard NB 4LD Class I 1, % ,575 Yes Okeechobee Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road WB 2L Uninterrupted 1, % Yes B Road F Road WB 2L Uninterrupted 1, % Yes Below LOS E Service Volume? k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 12

17 Traffic Impact Analysis LONG-TERM (YEAR 24) ANALYSIS A long-term analysis was conducted to evaluate anticipated conditions in Year 24. This analysis includes an evaluation of the impacts of the full development potential of the site. This analysis has been conducted using the criteria defined in Policy 3.5-d of the Future Land Use Element of the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan. Trip Generation The trip generation calculations are based on the trip generation rates published by Palm Beach County. The maximum development potential of the existing designation was calculated assuming a maximum development intensity of 129 dwelling units. For the analysis of the future proposed designation, a development potential of 1,3 dwelling units plus 112, square feet of commercial use and 112,123 square feet of civic use was assumed. As indicated in Table 5, the net change in trips for the maximum development potential under the proposed FLU for this parcel is 13,375 new external daily trips, 789 new external AM peakhour trips (241 in/548 out) and 1,86 new external PM peak-hour trips (628 in/458 out). k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 13

18 Traffic Impact Analysis Table 5 Trip Generation Potential Long-Term Horizon (Year 24) Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Total In Out Total In Out Current FLU Designation Gross Trips Single Family Detached 129 DU 1, Net New External Trips: Existing FLU 1, Proposed FLU Designation Gross Trips Single Family Detached 1,3 DU 1, Church/Synagogue 112,123 SF 1, General Commercial 112, SF 7, Subtotal 18, , Internal Capture daily AM PM Single Family Detached 6.49% 1.29% 6.77% Church/Synagogue 1.96%.%.% 2 General Commercial 9.14% 9.3% 8.98% , Pass-by General Commercial 39.3% 2, Net New External Trips: Proposed FLU 14, , Net Change: Proposed FLU - Existing FLU 13, , Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Trip Generation Single Family detached PBC = T = 1 * Units Church/Synagogue PBC = T = 9.11 * SF General Commercial PBC = T =.65*Ln(SF/1)+5.83 AM Peak Hour Trip Generation Single Family detached PBC = T =.75 * Units (25% in / 75% out) Church/Synagogue PBC = T =.56 * SF (62% in / 38% out) General Commercial PBC = T =.96 * SF (62% in / 38% out) PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Single Family detached PBC = Ln(T) =.9 * Ln(Units)+.51 (63% in / 37% out) Church/Synagogue PBC = T =.55 * SF (48% in / 52% out) General Commercial PBC = Ln(T) =.67* LN(SF/1) / 1, sq. ft. (48% in / 52% out) Traffic Distribution and Assignment Traffic distribution is the pairing of trip ends from the subject site with other land uses in the area. These trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways based upon a review of the roadway network proposed to be in place at the time of buildout and its travel time characteristics. The peak-hour trips for the project were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network proposed to be in place for the 24 analysis year. The assignment for this analysis includes k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 14

19 Traffic Impact Analysis the overall cost-feasible roadway network. Figure 3 illustrates the project traffic assignment to the surrounding roadway network for the long-term (Year 24) analysis. Radius of Development Influence Based upon the thresholds published in Policy 3.5-d of the Palm Beach County Future Land Use Plan, the radius of development influence for the daily volume of project traffic anticipated to be generated in the long-range planning horizon timeframe (13,375 trips) is four miles. k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 15

20 21% 22% 1% 21% SITE 11% 34% 9% 7% 24% 38% 5% 28% 8% 7% 15% LEGEND SITE ROAD NETWORK XX% FUTURE ROAD NETWORK PERCENT ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 3 FUTURE (24) PROJECT DISTRIBUTION IOTA CAROL 1419

21 Traffic Impact Analysis Long-Range Level of Service Analysis Significance was determined in accordance with the Daily LOS D service volumes defined in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code. The daily project trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network within the study radius in order to evaluate the project s impact in comparison to the LOS D adopted service volume. As indicated in Table 6, the following roadway segments are significantly impacted by the proposed FLU amendment in the long range analysis: Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road between Northlake Boulevard and Southern Boulevard Northlake Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Ibis Road Orange Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and 6 th Street North 6 th Street North between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Royal Palm Beach Boulevard Persimmon Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Royal Palm Beach Boulevard Okeechobee Boulevard between Seminole Pratt-Whitney Road and Folsom Road An analysis was then conducted to evaluate long-range level of service on these roadways. For the baseline analysis, the Year 24 volumes published by the Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) were utilized. Traffic generated by the approved Minto West and Avenir projects and the currently pending Indian Trails Grove project were then added along with traffic from this proposed FLU change in order to determine total Year 24 volumes. The analysis results are shown in Table 6. As shown in this tables, several roadway segments within the study area are not projected to meet the adopted level of service standards. k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 17

22 Traffic Impact Analysis Table 6 Long-Term (Year 24) LOS Analyses 24 Indian Trails Roadway Facility LOS D Service Percent Percent Significant MPO Model Minto West Avenir Grove 24 Lanes Iota Carol Classification Volume Impact Impact?? Volume Traffic Traffic Traffic TOTAL From To Assignment Daily Trips TRAFFIC v/c Seminole Pratt Whitney Road Northlake Boulevard Temple Boulevard 4L Class I 33,2 21% 3,8 9.28% Yes 31, 5,546 5,817 2,97 48, % Temple Boulevard Orange Boulevard 4L Class I 33,2 21% 3,8 9.28% Yes 31, 5,546 5,817 2,97 48, % Orange Boulevard 6th Street 4L Class I 33,2 11% 1, % Yes 28,6 7,487 5,526 4,667 47, % 6th Street Sycamore Drive 4L Class I 33,2 38% 5, % Yes 38,1 1,538 4,654 16,122 74, % Sycamore Drive Okeechobee Boulevard 4L Class I 33,2 28% 4, % Yes 39, 9,151 4,72 12,728 69,57 28.% Okeechobee Boulevard Southern Boulevard 4L Class I 33,2 15% 2,2 6.63% Yes 22,3 6,11 2,36 6,364 39, % Coconut Boulevard Northlake Blvd Orange Boulevard 2L Class I 15,2 1% % No 1,9 1,387 4, , % Orange Boulevard Persimmon Blvd 2L Class I 15,2 1% % No 4, , , % Northlake Blvd Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 14th Avenue 4L Class II % 3,8 9.28% Yes 19,5 4,437 6,981 8,91 42, % 14th Avenue Coconut Boulevard 4L Class II % 3, % Yes 32,2 4, ,91 49, % Coconut Boulevard (Royal Palm Beach Blvd) Ibis Road 4L Class II % 3, % Yes 34, 5,546 34,612 9,334 86, % Orange Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 14th Avenue 2L Class I 15,2 9% 1, % Yes 1, ,818 16, % 14th Avenue Coconut Boulevard 2L Class I 15,2 7% 1, % Yes 9, ,745 2,97 16, % Coconut Boulevard (Royal Palm Beach Blvd) 6th Street 2L Class I 15,2 5% % Yes 12,4 3,49 2,121 18, % 6th Street North Seminole-Pratt Whitney Road 14th Avenue 2L Class I 15,2 34% 4, % Yes 1, ,94 22, % 14th Avenue Royal Palm Beach Blvd 2L Class I 15,2 24% 3, % Yes 1,9 4, ,364 26, % Persimmon Boulevard Seminole Pratt Whitney Road 14th Avenue 2L Class I 15,2 5% % Yes 7,4 4, ,121 15, % 14th Avenue Royal Palm Beach Blvd 2L Class I 15,2 5% % Yes 19,7 4, ,121 27, % Okeechobee Blvd Seminole Pratt Whitney Road B Road 2L Class I 332 8% 1, % Yes 23,5 2,773 1,745 3,394 32, % B Road Folsom Road 2L Class I 332 7% 1,27 3.9% Yes 3,2 2, ,97 37, % k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 18

23 Traffic Impact Analysis CONCLUSION The foregoing comprehensive plan traffic analysis has been conducted to evaluate the proposed future land use change from for the Iota Carol site located in unincorporated Palm Beach County. The proposed plan will convert the existing RR-1 designation on the site to RR 1.25 with Commercial and Civic uses. Based on the analyses conducted for the short-term and long-term planning horizons, the adopted level of service standards are anticipated to still be met on any roadways significantly impacted by project traffic during the short range (Test 2-Five Year, Year 22) analysis. The Year 24 analysis indicates that some of the significantly impacted roadways segments will not meet the adopted level of service criteria; however, this analysis was based upon MPO model data using the Year 24 cost feasible plan. It is noted that the analysis includes traffic volumes generated by the approved Minto West and Avenir projects as well as the proposed Indian Trails Grove project, all of which will be providing roadway impact fee and proportionate share payments that may be applied toward further improvements in this area. Additionally, this project will be subject to roadway impact fee and proportionate share payments that will provide for further improvements on the transportation network in the surrounding area. Full details will be determined in the process of the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) analysis for this site. k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 19

24 Traffic Impact Analysis Kim ley > Horn APPENDIX A: PCN SHEETS k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc Page 1

25 Page 1 of 1 Location Address Municipality UNINCORPORATED Parcel Control Number Subdivision Official Records Book Page 1381 Legal Description Sale Date APR , ALL OF SEC A/K/A TRS1 THUR 56 PALM BEACH CITRUS FARMS AS IN OR3251 P318 (LESS NLY FT OF SLY FT IOTA CAROL LLC Owners Mailing address 4675 MACARTHUR CT STE 155 NEWPORT BEACH CA Sales Date Price OR Book/Page Sale Type Owner APR-213 $2,9, / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLC JAN-23 $1,17, / 958 WARRANTY DEED DELRAY LINTON ASSOCIATES LLC NOV-22 $ / 426 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TR & FEB-22 $ / 13 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TR APR-199 $3,36, 6422 / 29 WARRANTY DEED 1 2 No Exemption Information Available. Number of Units *Total Square Feet Acres Use Code 51 - AG Classification CROP SOIL CLASS 1 Zoning AR - Agricultural Residential ( - UNINCORPORATED ) Tax Year Improvement Value $ $ $ Land Value $6,997,2 $6,997,2 $6,997,2 Total Market Value $6,997,2 $6,997,2 $6,997,2 All values are as of January 1st each year Tax Year Assessed Value $757,65 $757,65 $759,985 Exemption Amount $ $ $ Taxable Value $757,65 $757,65 $759,985 Tax Year Ad Valorem $14,88 $14,244 $14,336 Non Ad Valorem $32,298 $32,298 $32,698 Total tax $46,386 $46,542 $47, /23/215

26 Page 1 of 1 12/23/215 Location Address Municipality UNINCORPORATED Parcel Control Number Subdivision Official Records Book Page 1381 Legal Description Sale Date APR , NLY FT OF SLY FT OF ELY 73 FT OF WLY FT, NLY FT OF SLY FT OF ELY 82 IOTA CAROL LLC Owners Mailing address 4675 MACARTHUR CT STE 155 NEWPORT BEACH CA Sales Date Price OR Book/Page Sale Type Owner APR-213 $2,9, / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLC JAN-23 $1,17, / 958 WARRANTY DEED DELRAY LINTON ASSOCIATES LLC NOV-22 $ / 426 QUIT CLAIM CHAPMAN ADRIAN R TR & APR-199 $6,, 6422 / 291 WARRANTY DEED JUL-1988 $55, 5766 / 389 WARRANTY DEED No Exemption Information Available. Number of Units 2 *Total Square Feet 2496 Acres 63.4 Use Code 51 - AG Classification CROP SOIL CLASS 1 Zoning AR - Agricultural Residential ( - UNINCORPORATED ) Tax Year Improvement Value $94,381 $97, $9,531 Land Value $756,48 $756,48 $756,48 Total Market Value $85,861 $853,48 $847,11 All values are as of January 1st each year Tax Year Assessed Value $283,441 $286,6 $268,791 Exemption Amount $ $ $ Taxable Value $283,441 $286,6 $268,791 Tax Year Ad Valorem $5,27 $5,378 $5,7 Non Ad Valorem $4,18 $4,184 $4,178 Total tax $9,45 $9,562 $9,248

27 Page 1 of 1 Location Address Municipality UNINCORPORATED Parcel Control Number Subdivision Official Records Book Page 1381 Sale Date APR-213 Legal Description , ALL IOTA CAROL LLC Owners Mailing address 4675 MACARTHUR CT STE 155 NEWPORT BEACH CA Sales Date Price OR Book/Page Sale Type Owner APR-213 $2,9, / 1381 CERT OF TITLE IOTA CAROL LLC SEP-23 $ / 1578 WARRANTY DEED EXODUS 613 LLC APR-23 $11,68, / 756 WARRANTY DEED EXODUS 613 LLC APR-23 $ / 839 WARRANTY DEED LULFS GROVES LLLP JUL-21 $ / 374 WARRANTY DEED LULFS GROVES No Exemption Information Available. Number of Units *Total Square Feet Acres Use Code 6 - AG Classification GRAGSOIL CLASS 1 Zoning AP - Agricultural Production ( - UNINCORPORATED ) Tax Year Improvement Value $ $ $ Land Value $7,71,6 $7,71,6 $6,738,9 Total Market Value $7,71,6 $7,71,6 $6,738,9 All values are as of January 1st each year Tax Year Assessed Value $514,499 $59,912 $72,68 Exemption Amount $ $ $ Taxable Value $514,499 $59,912 $72,68 Tax Year Ad Valorem $9,566 $9,587 $13,595 Non Ad Valorem $35,949 $35,949 $35,949 Total tax $45,515 $45,536 $49, /23/215

28 Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX B: TPS OUTPUT WORKSHEETS k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc

29 Input Data ROAD NAME: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 246 Report Created: 12/21/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 FROM: Orange Blvd TO: Midpoint GROWTH RATE: 4.59% COUNT DATE: 1/2/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Seminole Orange Plaza NR 28% Planet Kids IX - SPW NR % Minto West NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity L Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES NO YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES NO YES YES

30 Input Data ROAD NAME: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 246 Report Created: 12/21/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 FROM: Midpoint TO: Northlake Blvd GROWTH RATE: 4.59% COUNT DATE: 1/2/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Seminole Orange Plaza NR 28% Planet Kids IX - SPW NR % Minto West NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity L Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES NO YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES NO YES YES

31 Input Data ROAD NAME: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 248 Report Created: 12/21/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 FROM: 6th St N TO: Orange Blvd GROWTH RATE: 3.82% COUNT DATE: 1/2/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Arden PUD Res % Seminole Orange Plaza NR 28% Minto West NR % Loxahatchee Groves Commons NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity LD Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES

32 Input Data ROAD NAME: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 3442 Report Created: 12/21/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 FROM: Sycamore Dr TO: Persimmon Blvd GROWTH RATE: 2.93% COUNT DATE: 1/12/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Arden PUD Res % Seminole Orange Plaza NR 28% Minto West NR % Loxahatchee Groves Commons NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity LD Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES

33 Input Data ROAD NAME: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 3442 Report Created: 12/21/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 FROM: Persimmon Blvd TO: 6th St N GROWTH RATE: 2.93% COUNT DATE: 1/12/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Arden PUD Res % Seminole Orange Plaza NR 28% Minto West NR % Loxahatchee Groves Commons NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity LD Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES

34 Input Data ROAD NAME: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 3424 Report Created: 12/21/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 FROM: Okeechobee Blvd TO: Sycamore Dr GROWTH RATE: % COUNT DATE: 3/9/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Arden PUD Res % Seminole Orange Plaza NR 28% Minto West NR % Groves Town Center NR % Loxahatchee Groves Commons NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity L Link Meets Test 1? NO YES NO NO NO NO LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? NO YES YES NO NO NO

35 Input Data ROAD NAME: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 342 Report Created: 12/22/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 FROM: Southern Blvd TO: Midpoint GROWTH RATE: % COUNT DATE: 1/12/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Arden PUD Res % Minto West NR % Bink's Corporate Center NR 15% Groves Town Center NR % Loxahatchee Groves Commons NR % Palm Beach State College NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity LD Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES

36 Input Data ROAD NAME: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd STATION: 342 Report Created: 12/22/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 FROM: Midpoint TO: Okeechobee Blvd GROWTH RATE: % COUNT DATE: 1/12/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Arden PUD Res % Minto West NR % Bink's Corporate Center NR 15% Groves Town Center NR % Loxahatchee Groves Commons NR % Palm Beach State College NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity LD Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES

37 Input Data ROAD NAME: Okeechobee Blvd STATION: 3419 Report Created: 12/21/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 GROWTH RATE: % FROM: MIDPOINT TO: E Rd COUNT DATE: 1/12/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Palms West Medical 1 NR 92% Palms West Hospital NR 95% Arden PUD Res % Southern Palm Crossing NR 1% Fox DRI NR 94% Tract 115-Village Center NR % Minto West NR % Groves Town Center NR % Loxahatchee Groves Commons NR % Palm Beach State College NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity L Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES

38 Input Data ROAD NAME: Okeechobee Blvd STATION: 3419 Report Created: 12/21/215 CURRENT YEAR: 215 ANALYSIS YEAR: 22 GROWTH RATE: % FROM: Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd TO: MIDPOINT COUNT DATE: 1/12/215 PSF: 1 Link Analysis Time Period Direction 2-way AM NB/EB SB/WB 2-way PM NB/EB SB/WB Existing Volume Peak Volume Diversion(%) Volume after Diversion Committed Developments Type % Complete Palms West Medical 1 NR 92% Palms West Hospital NR 95% Arden PUD Res % Southern Palm Crossing NR 1% Fox DRI NR 94% Tract 115-Village Center NR % Minto West NR % Groves Town Center NR % Loxahatchee Groves Commons NR % Palm Beach State College NR % Avenir Res % Total Committed Developments Total Committed Residential Total Committed Non-Residential Double Count Reduction Total Discounted Committed Developments Historical Growth Comm Dev+1% Growth Growth Volume Used Total Volume Lanes LOS D Capacity L Link Meets Test 1? YES YES YES YES YES YES LOS E Capacity Link Meets Test 2? YES YES YES YES YES YES

39 Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX C: INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEETS k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc

40 ITE MULTI-USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET (ITE, Chapter 7, Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, June 24) Land Use A: Single Family Detached Project Number: Task Number: Project Name: IOTA CAROL Scenario: Proposed FLU Designation Analysis Period: PM _, Daily_ X, AM _. Analyst: ITE LUC: 21 Date: 12/21/215 Size: 1,3 DU Total Internal External Enter from External: 4,816 Enter 5, ,816 Exit to External: 4,816 Exit 5, ,816 Total 1, ,632 % 1% 6% 94% 9.% 464 Demand Demand 1.% Balanced Balanced 5 9.% 329 Demand Demand 1.% 5 Demand 9.% % 52 Demand Balanced Balanced Demand 9.% 329 Land Use B: Church/Synagogue 1.% 5 Demand Land Use C: General Commercial ITE LUC: 56 ITE LUC: 82 Size: 112,123 SF Size: 112, SF Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External: 51 Enter % % 37 Enter ,321 5 Exit Exit 3, ,321 Exit to External: Total Total Exit to External: % 1% 2% 98% Demand Balanced Demand % 1% 9% 91% 1.% % 37 NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT Land Use Category A B C Total Single Family DetachChurch/Synag General Co Enter 4, ,321 8,638 Exit 4, ,321 8,637 Total 9,632 1,1 6,642 17,275 Single Use Trip Gen Estimate 1,3 1,21 7,31 18,631 File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\[tri 6.49% 1.96% 9.14% Print Date = 12/28/15 Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 7.28%

41 ITE MULTI-USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET (ITE, Chapter 7, Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, June 24) Land Use A: Single Family Detached Project Number: Task Number: Project Name: IOTA CAROL Scenario: Proposed FLU Designation Analysis Period: PM _, Daily_, AM _X. Analyst: ITE LUC: 21 Date: 12/21/215 Size: 1,3 DU Total Internal External Enter from External: 189 Enter Exit to External: 574 Exit Total % 1% 1% 99% 9.% 17 Demand Demand 1.% 6 4 Balanced Balanced 9.% 4 Demand Demand 1.% Demand 9.% 52 1.% 2 Demand Balanced 6 Balanced Demand 9.% 6 Land Use B: Church/Synagogue 1.% Demand Land Use C: General Commercial ITE LUC: 56 ITE LUC: 82 Size: 112,123 SF Size: 112, SF Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External: 39 Enter % 1.% 1 Enter Exit Exit Exit to External: Total Total Exit to External: % 1% % 1% Demand Balanced Demand % 1% 9% 91% 1.% 1.% NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT Land Use Category A B C Total Single Family DetachChurch/Synag General Co Enter Exit Total Single Use Trip Gen Estimate File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\[tri 1.29%.% 9.3% Print Date = 12/28/15 Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 2.12%

42 ITE MULTI-USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET (ITE, Chapter 7, Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, June 24) Land Use A: Single Family Detached Project Number: Task Number: Project Name: IOTA CAROL Scenario: Proposed FLU Designation Analysis Period: PM _X, Daily_, AM _. Analyst: ITE LUC: 21 Date: 12/21/215 Size: 1,3 DU Total Internal External Enter from External: 51 Enter Exit to External: 289 Exit Total % 1% 7% 93% 9.% 49 Demand Demand 1.% 3 3 Balanced Balanced 9.% 3 Demand Demand 1.% Demand 9.% 29 1.% 5 Demand Balanced 28 Balanced Demand 9.% 28 Land Use B: Church/Synagogue 1.% Demand Land Use C: General Commercial ITE LUC: 56 ITE LUC: 82 Size: 112,123 SF Size: 112, SF Enter from External: Total Internal External Demand Balanced Demand Total Internal External Enter from External: 3 Enter % 1.% 3 Enter Exit Exit Exit to External: Total Total Exit to External: % 1% % 1% Demand Balanced Demand % 1% 9% 91% 1.% 1.% 3 NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT Land Use Category A B C Total Single Family DetachChurch/Synag General Co Enter Exit Total ,449 Single Use Trip Gen Estimate ,565 File Name = k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\[tri 6.77%.% 8.98% Print Date = 12/28/15 Print Time = 2:37 PM Internal Capture = 7.41%

43 Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX D: YEAR 24 MPO MODEL VOLUME OUTPUT DATA k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc

44 Palm Beach MPO 24 Cost Feasible Volumes Station Roadway From To Owner Cost Feasible Lanes Observed 25 Counts Observed 21 Counts Observed 214 Counts 24 LRTP Adjusted Volume 24 SERPM7 Adjusted Volume ND AVE NW Lake Worth Rd Congress Ave PBC 2 7,295 5,594 6,256 9,3 7, ND AVE NW Congress Ave Boutwell Rd PBC 2 5,816 4,127 4,517 9,1 7, TH AVE (NW) 4 Diagonal NW Palmetto Park Rd BR 2 8,57 8,36 1,66 1,1 8, TH AVE (NW) Glades Rd 4 Diagonal NW BR 2 8,681 8,558 9,813 9,7 1, TH AVE (NW) 2th St NW Glades Rd BR 2 7,631 8,853 9,943 8,6 1, TH AVE (SW) Palmetto Park Rd Camino Real BR 2 6,18 6,6 7,489 9,9 7, TH AVE NE Federal Hwy S of Federal Hwy BR 2 6,834 5,971 7,323 7,8 6, TH AVE NW Spanish River Blvd NW 2th St BR 2 5,875 6,39 8,422 13,5 9, TH AVE S Congress Ave Sunset Ave PBC 4D 31,64 28,972 29,48 4,6 39, 425 6TH AVE S Sunset Ave I-95 PBC 4D 32,125 37,165 33,195 39,6 45, TH AVE S I-95 SR 85 (Dixie Hwy) PBC 4D 27,99 26,868 27,896 35,9 33, TH AVE (SW) Palmetto Park Rd SW 13th St BR 2 2,929 2,232 2,412 2,2 3, TH AVE Glades Rd NW 15th St BR 2 8,935 6,615 1,38 1,4 7, TH AVE N Jog Rd Haverhill Rd PBC 4D 16,94 14,782 14,272 21,7 23, TH AVE N Haverhill Rd Military Tr PBC 5 21,367 21,819 N/A 25,6 27, TH AVE N Military Tr Kirk Rd PBC 5 27,837 26,22 26,75 35,2 35, TH AVE N Kirk Rd Congress Ave PBC 5 33,131 3,129 31,996 42,8 39, TH AVE N Congress Ave I-95 PBC 5 42,81 44,53 44,441 5,5 53, TH AVE N I-95 'A' St PBC 5 33,648 3,251 33,252 38,9 33, TH AVE N 'A' St US 1 PBC 5 21,93 2,149 21,813 23,6 21, TH AVE Camino Gardens Blvd 18th St SW BR 2 8,52 6,776 7,75 11, 8, TH AVE Palmetto Park Rd 13th St SW BR 2 11,579 1,66 14,119 17,5 12, TH AVE N of Palmetto Park Rd Palmetto Park Rd BR 4 21,72 18,175 21,863 22, TH AVE S 'A' Ave Lake Osborne Dr LW 2 6,417 6,42 5,314 6,6 6, TH ST Glades Rd 1th Ave NW BR 4D 16,556 12,815 13,67 18,8 14, TH AVE Glades Rd NW 7th St BR 2 13,332 13,384 15,758 15,8 13, TH AVE N 'A' Ave N Pinetree Ln LW 2 1,863 1,71 1,589 2,2 2, TH ST 5th Ave NW FAU BR 4D 5,878 6,695 9,21 3,2 7, TH ST US 1 Old Dixie Hwy BR 4D 11,679 1,865 12,128 12, 1, RD AVE Military Tr E Country Rd PBC 2 11,41 11,294 11,64 12, 13, RD AVE E Country Rd Congress Ave PBC 2 13,36 13,5 13,698 14, 15, RD AVE Congress Ave I-95 PBC 2 14,227 13,341 13,562 15, 16, RD AVE I-95 Seacrest Blvd PBC 2 15,92 14,56 12,827 16,5 16, RD AVE Seacrest Blvd US-1 PBC 2 9,254 8,556 8,638 9,1 1, TH ST Tamarind Ave Australian Ave WPB 2 1,898 N/A N/A 13,1 13, TH ST Broadway (WPB) Australian Ave WPB 2 9,478 N/A N/A 11,2 6, TH ST Jog Rd Haverhill Rd PBC 2 5,839 4,392 5,322 24,7 9, TH ST Haverhill Rd Military Tr PBC 6D 27,729 24,892 26,349 45,2 4, TH ST Military Tr Village Blvd PBC 6D 44,965 39,96 39,648 59,6 53, TH ST Village Blvd I-95 PBC 6D 52,88 55,134 59,19 67,3 72, TH ST I-95 Congress Ave PBC 8D 56,431 53,333 55,715 67, TH ST Congress Ave Australian Ave PBC 6D 47,616 42,367 44,996 51,7 5, TH ST Australian Ave Greenwood Ave PBC 4D 3,529 25,475 26,997 28,9 26, TH ST Greenwood Ave Broadway (WPB) PBC 3 15,819 12,717 13,442 15, 14, TH ST Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd 14th Ave N PBC 2 N/A N/A N/A 1,9 9, ND ST Congress Ave I-95 BR 4D 21,753 2,793 23,867 24,1 26,3 1/14/215 S:\LRTP\24 LRTP\Modeling\Cost Feasible Plan\24 CF Model Volumes_S65_Update_ xlsx Page 1 of 2

45 Station Roadway From To Owner Cost Feasible Lanes Observed 25 Counts Observed 21 Counts Observed 214 Counts 24 LRTP Adjusted Volume 24 SERPM7 Adjusted Volume 126 CENTRAL BLVD Donald Ross Rd Frederick Small Rd PBC 4D 15,78 16,682 16,86 32,8 3, CENTRAL BLVD Frederick Small Rd Indian Creek Pkwy PBC 4D 1,954 12,75 13,25 25,4 21,9 166 CENTRAL BLVD Indian Creek Pkwy Indiantown Rd PBC 4D 27,217 26,285 23,699 3,2 19, CENTRAL BLVD Indiantown Rd Church St PBC 2 19,245 13,34 15,331 2,8 15,8 643 CLINT MOORE RD SR 7 Lyons Rd PBC 4D 13,291 15,148 16,612 17,8 18, 621 CLINT MOORE RD Lyons Rd Jog Rd PBC 4D 21,89 21,525 23,563 27,1 29,5 667 CLINT MOORE RD Jog Rd Military Tr PBC 4D 29,949 28,767 3,162 38,7 34,5 661 CLINT MOORE RD Military Tr Congress Ave BR 6D 3,737 29,298 26,151 33,8 32,6 631 CLINT MOORE RD Congress Ave NW 2nd Ave BR 4D 13,712 1,637 11,25 14,7 11,1 214 COCONUT BLVD Persimmon Bl Orange Bl PBC 2 3,986 2,791 2,833 4,4 4, COCONUT BLVD Orange Bl Temple Blvd PBC 2 13,365 1,796 11,181 1,9 12,8 244 COCONUT BLVD Temple Blvd Northlake Blvd PBC 2 14,14 11,665 11,632 7,7 13, COMMUNITY DR Haverhill Rd Military Tr PBC 5 16,26 15,11 13,839 16,2 17, COMMUNITY DR Military Tr Village Blvd PBC 3 17,24 15,76 16,698 21,1 16, CONGRESS AVE Yamato Rd Clint Moore Rd BR 6D 25,198 25,74 26,125 32,8 31, CONGRESS AVE Clint Moore Rd NW 82nd St BR 6D 28,85 28,3 31,979 41,3 33,9 624 CONGRESS AVE NW 82nd St Linton Blvd BR 6D 24,665 17,757 19,84 32,6 25,9 565 CONGRESS AVE Linton Blvd Lowson Blvd PBC 6D 26,965 23,248 24,56 33,6 3, 5612 CONGRESS AVE Lowson Blvd Atlantic Ave PBC 6D 3,312 26,151 27,833 36, 3,9 563 CONGRESS AVE Atlantic Ave Lake Ida Rd PBC 6D 32,662 32,658 32,989 42,3 38,1 562 CONGRESS AVE Lake Ida Rd 35th Ave SW PBC 6D 31,948 29,74 29,551 41,2 35, CONGRESS AVE 35th Ave SW Golf Rd PBC 6D 38,852 34,332 35,615 5,7 39, CONGRESS AVE Golf Rd Woolbright Rd PBC 6D 41,51 35,627 38,169 51,1 4,5 561 CONGRESS AVE Woolbright Rd Boynton Beach Blvd PBC 6D 38,259 32,543 31,395 48,2 36, CONGRESS AVE Boynton Beach Blvd Old Boynton Rd PBC 6D N/A 47,139 39,255 39, 55,5 526 CONGRESS AVE Old Boynton Rd Gateway Blvd PBC 6D 48,285 36,788 39,191 52,8 44,1 461 CONGRESS AVE Gateway Blvd Hypoluxo Rd PBC 6D 36,348 28,826 27,792 38,6 38,4 46 CONGRESS AVE Hypoluxo Rd Lantana Rd PBC 4D 29,993 25,175 23,327 33,7 32, 4624 CONGRESS AVE Lantana Rd JFK Dr FDOT 6D 41,814 31,73 33,356 55,3 49, CONGRESS AVE JFK Dr 6th Ave S FDOT 6D 44,492 33,615 34,374 58,5 53, CONGRESS AVE 6th Ave S Lake Worth Rd FDOT 6D 43,176 35,682 38,653 56,8 53,8 462 CONGRESS AVE Lake Worth Rd French Ave FDOT 6D 45,274 36,622 36,85 54, 47,9 464 CONGRESS AVE French Ave 1th Ave N FDOT 6D 47,387 39,769 4,836 6,6 53,2 421 CONGRESS AVE 1th Ave N Forest Hill Blvd FDOT 6D 44,674 36,68 35,57 55, 51, CONGRESS AVE Forest Hill Blvd Summit Blvd FDOT 6D 35,421 29,79 29,533 46,1 41, CONGRESS AVE Summit Blvd Gun Club Rd FDOT 6D 4,82 34,458 34,957 48,4 49, 3618 CONGRESS AVE Gun Club Rd Southern Blvd FDOT 6D 44,515 34,224 33,265 5,1 42, CONGRESS AVE Turnage Blvd (PBIA) Belvedere Rd PBC 2 7,89 5,625 4,532 9,7 5,3 366 CONGRESS AVE Belvedere Rd Okeechobee Blvd PBC 4D 24,328 16,624 N/A 29,9 21,8 335 CONGRESS AVE Okeechobee Blvd Palm Beach Lakes Blvd PBC 4D 25,375 16,832 17,469 28,9 23,4 393 CONGRESS AVE Palm Beach Lakes Blvd Presidential Way PBC 5 29,729 18,35 17,231 33,2 27, CONGRESS AVE Presidential Way 45th St PBC 5 28,624 17,424 16,245 32,1 23,4 238 CONGRESS AVE 45th St MLK Blvd PBC 6D 34,417 25,43 21,5 43,1 36, CONGRESS AVE MLK Blvd Blue Heron Blvd PBC 4D 27,55 18,586 17,141 28, 2, CONGRESS AVE Blue Heron Blvd Silverbeach Rd PBC 4D 24,398 N/A 22,52 41, 28,4 262 CONGRESS AVE Silverbeach Rd Northlake Blvd PBC 4D 25,819 24,47 24,294 3,3 33, CONGRESS AVE Northlake Blvd Alt. A1A PBC 2 N/A N/A N/A 17,3 12, 711 CR-717 State Market Rd SR-729 SR-7, US-98 PBC 2 3,171 N/A 2,415 5,2 3,1 1/14/215 S:\LRTP\24 LRTP\Modeling\Cost Feasible Plan\24 CF Model Volumes_S65_Update_ xlsx Page 5 of 2

46 Station Roadway From To Owner Cost Feasible Lanes Observed 25 Counts Observed 21 Counts Observed 214 Counts 24 LRTP Adjusted Volume 24 SERPM7 Adjusted Volume 26 MILITARY TRL Northlake Blvd Holly Dr FDOT 6D 43,999 37,391 41,55 6,4 41,6 266 MILITARY TRL Holly Dr PGA Blvd FDOT 6D 44,353 37,111 38,816 51,2 42, MILITARY TRL PGA Blvd I-95 PBC 6D 38,882 33,368 35,18 63,6 39,9 264 MILITARY TRL I-95 Hood Rd PBC 6D 27,564 24,838 26,746 47,5 26,8 228 MILITARY TRL Hood Rd Donald Ross Rd PBC 6D 23,883 24,233 24,51 26,7 32,6 162 MILITARY TRL Donald Ross Rd Frederick Small Rd PBC 6D 3,572 34,542 33,79 41,6 44, 168 MILITARY TRL Frederick Small Rd Indian Creek Blvd PBC 6D 28,57 3,3 29,553 36,4 38,5 16 MILITARY TRL Indian Creek Blvd Indiantown Rd PBC 6D 25,419 24,322 23,597 29,4 33,3 469 MINER RD Congress Ave High Ridge Rd PBC 2 N/A N/A 6,376 4,8 5, MIZNER BLVD US-1 (Federal Hwy) Palmetto Park Rd BR 4D 4,895 9,33 1,21 7,6 12, MIZNER BLVD Palmetto Park Rd Federal Hwy BR 4D 1,273 1,1 1,739 8, 13, NORTHLAKE BLVD Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd 14th Ave N PBC 4 11,89 1,74 9,872 19,5 14, NORTHLAKE BLVD 14th Ave N Coconut Blvd PBC 4 N/A N/A 16,278 32,2 29, NORTHLAKE BLVD Coconut Blvd Ibis Rd PBC 4D 29,74 25,889 29,522 34, 34,7 247 NORTHLAKE BLVD Ibis Rd Beeline Hwy PBC 4D 36,674 32,431 33,81 57,9 5,6 241 NORTHLAKE BLVD Beeline Hwy Ryder Cup Blvd PBC 6D 23,949 21,45 22,68 35,3 26,3 225 NORTHLAKE BLVD Ryder Cup Blvd Steeplechase Dr / Ballenisles Dr PBC 6D 34,28 3,72 3,76 56,1 46,6 265 NORTHLAKE BLVD Steeplechase Dr / Ballenisles Dr Military Tr PBC 6D 45,285 N/A 42,624 62,3 46,5 227 NORTHLAKE BLVD Military Tr I-95 PBC 6D 51,985 46,823 51,46 65,4 59,4 239 NORTHLAKE BLVD I-95 Congress Ave PBC 6D 53,292 54,58 58,565 63,6 66, NORTHLAKE BLVD Congress Ave SR 811 PBC 6D 44,623 41,315 45,459 38,4 43, NORTHLAKE BLVD SR 811 Prosperity Farms Rd PBC 6D 31,68 33,679 N/A 33,3 4, NORTHLAKE BLVD Prosperity Farms Rd Southwind Dr PBC 6D 36,214 32,68 34,199 38,9 4, NORTHLAKE BLVD Southwind Dr US-1 PBC 6D 27,179 28,891 N/A 29,5 33,4 581 OCEAN AVE Federal Hwy N Ocean Blvd SR A1A FDOT 2 6,836 6,31 8,713 7,3 6,6 483 OCEAN AVE SR A1A US-1 FDOT 2 17,736 15,418 13,166 19, 15, OKEECHOBEE BLVD SR-8/CR-88 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd PBC 2 N/A N/A N/A 5,5 2, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd 14th PBC 4 12,52 8,931 8,715 23,5 14, OKEECHOBEE BLVD 14th Crestwood Blvd PBC 4 19,26 15,734 14,993 3,2 22, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Crestwood Blvd Royal Palm Beach Blvd PBC 6D 36,631 26,2 27,926 5,7 38, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Royal Palm Beach Blvd Wildcat Way PBC 6D 63,125 37,519 43,446 6,7 49, 341 OKEECHOBEE BLVD Wildcat Way SR-7 PBC 8D 6,778 38,58 42,586 6,4 66,6 343 OKEECHOBEE BLVD SR-7 Sansbury's Way FDOT 8D 51,56 47,421 49,3 61,2 56, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Sansbury's Way Benoist Farms Rd FDOT 8D 57,338 45,47 53,637 73,3 54, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Benoist Farms Rd Skees Rd FDOT 8D 61,364 51,11 57,937 8, 57, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Skees Rd Jog Rd FDOT 8D 66,486 52,669 6,547 88,8 6,6 313 OKEECHOBEE BLVD Jog Rd Florida Turnpike FDOT 8D 74,427 51,444 6,643 98,5 53,9 327 OKEECHOBEE BLVD Florida Turnpike Haverhill Rd FDOT 8D 7,171 61,25 65,684 94, 73, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Haverhill Rd Military Tr FDOT 8D 72,815 63,956 68,211 17,9 72, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Military Tr Palm Beach Lakes Blvd FDOT 8D 76,634 71,364 71,313 94,1 75,9 363 OKEECHOBEE BLVD Palm Beach Lakes Blvd Congress Ave FDOT 8D 55,226 46,833 5,66 68,9 55,2 329 OKEECHOBEE BLVD Congress Ave I-95 FDOT 8D 64,18 59,657 61,35 89,7 68,7 337 OKEECHOBEE BLVD I-95 Australian Ave FDOT 8D 66,47 72,83 73,423 19,6 6, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Australian Ave Tamarind Ave FDOT 8D 6,94 64,974 67,947 16,8 7, OKEECHOBEE BLVD Tamarind Ave Dixie Hwy FDOT 8D 48,94 4,967 46,717 75,9 49, OLD BOYNTON RD Military Tr Lawrence Rd PBC 5 18,88 15,193 15,75 28, 18, OLD BOYNTON RD Lawrence Rd Congress Ave PBC 5 23,624 16,962 18,627 29,9 2, OLD BOYNTON RD Congress Ave Boynton Beach Blvd PBC 2 13,381 N/A 14,452 15,4 16,1 1/14/215 S:\LRTP\24 LRTP\Modeling\Cost Feasible Plan\24 CF Model Volumes_S65_Update_ xlsx Page 14 of 2

47 Station Roadway From To Owner Cost Feasible Lanes Observed 25 Counts Observed 21 Counts Observed 214 Counts 24 LRTP Adjusted Volume 24 SERPM7 Adjusted Volume 631 OLD DIXIE HWY Broward County Line SW 18th St BR 4D 16,673 15,273 17,498 37,8 21, OLD DIXIE HWY SW 18th St Camino Real BR 4D 2,247 19,8 23,85 3, 26,6 687 OLD DIXIE HWY Camino Real Palmetto Park Rd BR 4D 23,27 21,219 23,258 33,4 26,9 69 OLD DIXIE HWY Palmetto Park Rd Glades Rd BR 5 22,49 17,962 22,1 31, 25, OLD DIXIE HWY Glades Rd NE 2th St BR 4D 19,172 17,861 22,3 25,2 22,6 686 OLD DIXIE HWY NE 2th St Spanish River Blvd BR 4D 18,95 17,346 18,286 22,9 19, OLD DIXIE HWY Spanish River Blvd Yamato Rd BR 4D 17,518 15,769 16,761 17,1 16,7 634 OLD DIXIE HWY Lindell Blvd Hidden Valley Blvd BR 3 12,946 11,986 12,76 16, 15,2 332 OLD DIXIE HWY 45th St MLK Jr Blvd WPB 4 17,11 11,465 11,721 19,7 12,8 281 OLD DIXIE HWY MLK Blvd Blue Heron Blvd PBC 5 16,47 11,52 13,188 17,8 12,4 288 OLD DIXIE HWY Blue Heron Blvd Silverbeach Rd PBC 4D 17,11 13,667 16,387 17,4 16,1 186 OLD DIXIE HWY SR-811/Beach Rd Tequesta Dr PBC 4 13,863 12,257 12,771 14,3 18, OLD DIXIE HWY Tequesta Dr County Line Rd PBC 2 6,712 8,112 6,898 6,9 9,7 338 OLIVE AVE S WPB City Limit Alhambra Pl WPB 2 1,263 7,44 6,728 9,3 7, OLIVE AVE Alhambra Pl Forest Hill Blvd NON 2 N/A N/A N/A 5,5 2,6 391 OLIVE AVE Forest Hill Blvd Essex Ln WPB 2 11,41 N/A N/A 7, OLIVE AVE Essex Ln Southern Blvd WPB 2 12,25 N/A N/A 7,7 1,6 388 OLIVE AVE Southern Blvd Monroe Dr WPB 2 9,87 4,446 N/A 5,6 4, OLIVE AVE Monroe Dr Belvedere Rd PBC 2 8,97 4,334 N/A 6,3 4, OLIVE AVE Belvedere Rd Okeechobee Bl WPB 2 14,435 3,98 N/A 17,7 4, OLIVE AVE Okeechobee Bl Banyan Blvd WPB 2 13,932 N/A N/A 15,1 11, OLIVE AVE Banyan Blvd Loftin St WPB 2 1,191 5,19 3,77 13,5 6,3 383 OLIVE AVE Loftin St Palm Beach Lakes Blvd FDOT 2 5,943 2,955 2,644 7,5 6, 2417 ORANGE BLVD Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd 14th Ave N PBC 2 N/A 7,292 7,987 1, 6,8 249 ORANGE BLVD 14th Ave N Coconut Blvd PBC 2 8,513 8,89 8,168 9,8 11, ORANGE BLVD Coconut Blvd Royal Palm Beach Bl PBC 2 13,689 12,613 13,12 12,4 14,5 361 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD Okeechobee Blvd Village Blvd PBC 6D 37,526 31,84 33,81 39,1 36,8 325 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD Village Blvd I-95 PBC 6D 6,62 49,858 53,359 66,6 54,8 333 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD I-95 PB Mall Main Entrance PBC 6D 56,76 43,986 55,446 64,4 63,7 389 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD PB Mall Main Entrance Congress Ave PBC 6D 46,761 41,485 45,7 52,7 49, PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD Congress Ave Australian Ave PBC 6D 46,283 39,526 4,574 61,8 47, PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD Australian Ave Tamarind Ave PBC 4D 34,55 29,121 31,12 37,1 32, 387 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD Tamarind Ave Dixie Hwy PBC 4D 2,954 22,22 23,513 23,4 25, PALMETTO PARK RD Glades Rd Ponderosa Dr PBC 4D 14,533 12,453 14,3 19,3 13,2 649 PALMETTO PARK RD Ponderosa Dr SR-7 PBC 4D 25,341 2,37 21,872 32,7 23,3 645 PALMETTO PARK RD SR-7 Lyons Rd PBC 6D 37,111 3,358 29,747 34,7 33, PALMETTO PARK RD Lyons Rd Boca Rio Rd PBC 6D 47,481 42,391 41,885 47,9 47, PALMETTO PARK RD Boca Rio Rd Powerline Rd PBC 6D 57,918 47,599 47,837 59,9 64, PALMETTO PARK RD Powerline Rd St Andrews Blvd PBC 6D 55,184 47,74 47,262 59,5 51, 669 PALMETTO PARK RD St Andrews Blvd Military Tr PBC 6D 58,273 52,244 51,342 68,3 53, 629 PALMETTO PARK RD Military Tr I-95 PBC 6D 62,369 56,384 58,997 72,3 639 PALMETTO PARK RD I-95 12th St PBC 6D 57,155 56,81 56,15 62,3 19, PALMETTO PARK RD 12th St Boca Raton Blvd BR 4D 38,166 34,777 37,697 39,9 35, 6873 PALMETTO PARK RD Boca Raton Blvd Old Dixie Hwy BR 4D 31,125 3,915 29,487 35,7 35, PALMETTO PARK RD Old Dixie Hwy Federal Hwy BR 4D 16,266 2,367 2,798 2,1 24, PALMETTO PARK RD Federal Hwy NE 5th Ave BR 4D 17,969 15,668 14,325 19,9 17,5 683 PALMETTO PARK RD NE 5th Ave ICWW Bridge BR 4D 14,853 14,662 13,533 13,9 15, PALMETTO PARK RD ICWW Bridge A1A PBC 4D 15,119 14,135 15,67 13,4 14,4 1/14/215 S:\LRTP\24 LRTP\Modeling\Cost Feasible Plan\24 CF Model Volumes_S65_Update_ xlsx Page 15 of 2

48 Station Roadway From To Owner Cost Feasible Lanes Observed 25 Counts Observed 21 Counts Observed 214 Counts 24 LRTP Adjusted Volume 24 SERPM7 Adjusted Volume 131 PALMWOOD AVE Frederick Small Rd Donald Ross Rd PBC 2 5,991 4,147 3,437 8,4 4, PARK AVE Federal Hwy 1TH St PBC 2 6,645 5,68 5,431 12,6 7, PARK AVE Congress Ave Old Dixie Hwy PBC 2 N/A N/A N/A 12,6 11,4 392 PARKER AVE Forest Hill Blvd Summit Blvd WPB 2 7,111 N/A N/A 8,8 12, 3896 PARKER AVE Summit Blvd Southern Blvd WPB 4 14,731 N/A N/A 13,1 1, 3872 PARKER AVE Southern Blvd Belvedere Rd WPB 4 9,957 N/A N/A 1,1 8, PARKER AVE Belvedere Rd Okeechobee Blvd WPB 4 19,454 N/A N/A 11,3 2, PERSIMMON BLVD Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd 14th Ave N PBC 4 N/A N/A N/A 7,4 7, 3447 PERSIMMON BLVD 13th Ave N Royal Palm Beach Bl PBC 2 7,621 5,874 5,977 19,7 245 PGA BLVD Bee Line Hwy Ryder Cup Blvd (Jog Rd) FDOT 4 5,81 3,479 3,518 11,7 5,6 213 PGA BLVD Ryder Cup Blvd (Jog Rd) Florida Turnpike FDOT 4D 24,751 22,995 25,572 35, 29,4 221 PGA BLVD Florida Turnpike Central Blvd FDOT 6D 46,848 45,217 43,627 68,9 61,7 269 PGA BLVD Central Blvd Military Tr FDOT 6D 47,793 44,296 47,278 54,9 47, 223 PGA BLVD Military Tr I-95 FDOT 6D 49,342 46,147 49,91 56,7 46,1 233 PGA BLVD I-95 SR 811 FDOT 8D 61,761 59,95 69,379 61,4 72, PGA BLVD SR 811 Gardens Mall FDOT 6D 57,253 51,677 54,625 77,3 72,5 285 PGA BLVD Gardens Mall Prosperity Farms Rd FDOT 6D 44,137 38,76 41,536 46,4 38,5 283 PGA BLVD Prosperity Farms Rd Ellison Wilson Rd FDOT 6D 45,667 39,88 39,794 48,9 41, 2837 PGA BLVD Ellison Wilson Rd Federal Hwy FDOT 6D 3,962 26,47 26,974 36,7 28, PIKE RD Southern Blvd Fla Turnpike Entrance PBC 4 13,697 14,392 15,116 22,1 25,5 345 PIKE RD Fla Turnpike Entrance Belvedere Rd PBC 2 5,745 4,73 5,638 7,1 9, PINE TREE LN Forest Hill Blvd Keller Rd PBC 2 2,383 2,382 2,253 2,9 2, PINEHURST DR 1th Ave N Lake Worth Rd PBC 2 1,323 8,789 9,14 1,1 11, 422 PINEHURST DR Forest Hill Blvd 1TH Ave N PBC 2 1,475 9,276 9,579 12,2 11, PIPERS GLEN BLVD El Clair Ranch Rd Military Tr PBC 2 5,869 5,429 5,284 9,8 7, POINSETTIA AVE 36TH St 25TH St WPB 2 4,725 N/A N/A 5,4 5,8 386 POINSETTIA AVE 45th St 36th St WPB 2 11,188 N/A N/A 12,3 3,5 38 POINSETTIA AVE 45TH St N End WPB 2 2,837 N/A N/A 3,9 3, POLO RD Lake Worth Rd Lyons Rd PBC 2 N/A N/A N/A 15,4 14, PONDEROSA DR Glades Rd Palmetto Park Rd PBC 2 4,734 4,37 3,945 5,8 5, POTOMAC RD Jog Rd St Andrews Blvd BR 4D 7,812 7,242 8,19 16,3 13, POTOMAC RD St Andrews Blvd Military Tr BR 4 1,92 9,999 11,365 17,7 13,6 621 POWERLINE RD Broward County Line SW 18th St FDOT 4D 37,25 N/A 34,347 5,8 42, POWERLINE RD SW 18th St Camino Real FDOT 4D 35,27 N/A 31,27 45,1 3, POWERLINE RD Camino Real Palmetto Park Rd FDOT 4D 43,555 N/A 44,561 5,5 37, POWERLINE RD Palmetto Park Rd Sunstream Blvd FDOT 4D 29,31 N/A 28,274 34,1 22,2 662 POWERLINE RD Sunstream Blvd Glades Rd FDOT 4D 31,736 N/A 24,47 38,9 31,8 142 PRATT-WHITNEY RD Indiantown Rd Bee Line Hwy PBC 2 3,556 4,228 4,726 16,4 11,1 114 PRATT-WHITNEY RD Indiantown Rd Martin County Line PBC 2 2,711 2,994 3,368 7,9 6,6 286 PROSPERITY FARMS RD Northlake Blvd Lighthouse Dr PBC 3 19,199 17,866 17,412 18,8 18, PROSPERITY FARMS RD Lighthouse Dr Burns Rd PBC 3 2,64 17,85 17,15 2,9 19,2 284 PROSPERITY FARMS RD Burns Rd PGA Blvd PBC 5 27,931 27,164 26,886 31,3 28,5 282 PROSPERITY FARMS RD PGA Blvd Hood Rd PBC 4D 17,85 18,843 19,987 26,1 22, 232 PROSPERITY FARMS RD Hood Rd Donald Ross Rd PBC 2 11,672 9,97 8,569 14,4 11, 4637 PURDY LN Jog Rd Haverhill Rd PBC 2 7,532 8,536 7,21 7,4 1, PURDY LN Haverhill Rd Military Tr PBC 2 13,248 9,583 1,321 15,9 12, QUADRILLE BLVD Okeechobee Blvd Fern St WPB 4 9,895 N/A N/A -3,7 21, QUADRILLE BLVD Fern St Clematis St WPB 4 14,87 N/A N/A 21,8 9, QUADRILLE BLVD Clematis St SR-5 WPB 4 14,89 N/A N/A 2,3 1, RCA BLVD Alt A1A Prosperity Farms Rd PBC 2 1,9 9,138 9,865 1,5 1, ROEBUCK RD Loxahatchee River Rd Central Blvd PBC 2 8,579 5,477 5,2 7,9 5,8 1/14/215 S:\LRTP\24 LRTP\Modeling\Cost Feasible Plan\24 CF Model Volumes_S65_Update_ xlsx Page 16 of 2

49 Station Roadway From To Owner Cost Feasible Lanes Observed 25 Counts Observed 21 Counts Observed 214 Counts 24 LRTP Adjusted Volume 24 SERPM7 Adjusted Volume ROEBUCK RD SR-7 Jog Rd PBC 4 N/A N/A N/A 19,4 15,8 317 ROEBUCK RD Jog Rd Haverhill Rd PBC 4 18,62 17,913 18,539 21,9 28, ROEBUCK RD Haverhill Rd Military Trail PBC 2 N/A 8,588 9,39 15,9 11, 3412 ROYAL PALM BEACH BLVD Southern Blvd Okeechobee Blvd RPB 2 15,19 15,911 13,527 18,3 17,5 341 ROYAL PALM BEACH BLVD Okeechobee Blvd RPB North City Limits RPB 4D 38,67 22,123 21,384 27,6 23, 3426 ROYAL PALM BEACH BLVD RPB North City Limits M Canal PBC 4D 32,722 16,753 14,3 27,8 22, 242 ROYAL PALM BEACH BLVD M Canal Orange Blvd PBC 4 17,113 15,825 15,932 19,4 19, ROYAL PALM BRIDGE County Rd Olive Ave FDOT 4D 22,925 2,23 29,265 3,3 18, 3833 ROYAL POINCIANA WAY N Flagler Dr Royal Poinciana Wy FDOT 4 24,543 15,122 N/A 38,8 13, SANSBURYS WAY Southern Blvd Belvedere Rd PBC 2 5,869 9,2 11,97 1,4 11, SANSBURYS WAY Belvedere Rd Okeechobee Bl PBC 2 4,83 7,691 6,835 9,4 8,1 582 SEACREST BLVD 23rd Ave Woolbright Rd PBC 5 22,554 21,73 2,566 25, 22, 58 SEACREST BLVD Woolbright Rd Boynton Beach Blvd PBC 5 17,989 13,982 11,793 23,2 19,4 532 SEACREST BLVD Boynton Beach Blvd Gateway Blvd PBC 5 14,795 12,733 11,423 15,8 15,7 486 SEACREST BLVD Gateway Blvd Hypoluxo Rd PBC 5 14,29 11,637 11,46 16,7 15,5 342 SEMINOLE PRATT-WHITNEY RD Southern Blvd Okeechobee Blvd PBC 4D 18,769 14,351 13,4 22,3 2, SEMINOLE PRATT-WHITNEY RD Okeechobee Blvd Sycamore Dr E PBC 4 22,377 17,383 N/A 39, 19, SEMINOLE PRATT-WHITNEY RD Sycamore Dr E 6TH ST N PBC 4D 18,742 16,62 N/A 38,1 23, 248 SEMINOLE PRATT-WHITNEY RD 6TH ST N Orange Bl PBC 4D 14,646 14,772 N/A 28,6 2,5 246 SEMINOLE PRATT-WHITNEY RD Orange Bl Northlake Blvd PBC 4 15,781 11,76 1,46 31, 21, SEMINOLE PRATT-WHITNEY RD N of Northlake Blvd SR-71 PBC 2 N/A N/A N/A 15,5 8, SHERWOOD FOREST BLVD Lake Worth Rd 1th Ave N PBC 2 7,677 5,767 7,699 8,1 9, SHERWOOD FOREST BLVD 1th Ave N Cresthaven Blvd PBC 2 9,95 7,736 8,622 9,7 1,6 42 SHERWOOD FOREST BLVD Cresthaven Blvd Forest Hill Blvd PBC 2 7,434 6,348 6,751 9,1 9, SILVER BEACH RD Congress Ave Old Dixie Hwy PBC 3 N/A 13,58 13,49 6,9 12,8 287 SILVER BEACH RD Old Dixie Hwy US-1 PBC 3 13,451 11,591 11,939 17,1 13, SKEES RD Okeechobee Bl Belvedere Rd PBC 2 5,651 4,956 4,663 1,2 6, SOUTH SHORE DR Lake Worth Rd Greenview Shores Bl WEL 2 18,874 16,271 16,739 2,2 18, SOUTH SHORE DR Greenview Shores Bl Big Blue Trace WEL 4D 2,318 18,47 21,697 21,5 2, SOUTH SHORE DR Big Blue Trace Forest Hill Blvd WEL 4D 26,822 23,838 26,986 29, 26,2 311 SOUTHERN BLVD CR 88 Lion Country Safari FDOT 4D 17,567 19,72 15,321 24,7 34, SOUTHERN BLVD Lion Country Safari Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd FDOT 6D N/A 22,49 2,81 36,5 53, SOUTHERN BLVD Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd Binks Forest Drive FDOT 6D 37,182 28,63 29,957 62,9 45, SOUTHERN BLVD Binks Forest Drive Big Blue Trace FDOT 6D 35,256 35,35 33,674 6,2 56, SOUTHERN BLVD Big Blue Trace Forest Hill/Crestwood FDOT 6D 45,385 46,881 46,54 65,2 72, SOUTHERN BLVD Forest Hill/Crestwood Cypress Head FDOT 6D 42,335 54,33 57,966 68,9 73, SOUTHERN BLVD Cypress Head Royal Palm Beach Blvd FDOT 6D 45,352 53,158 59,36 75,5 71,3 345 SOUTHERN BLVD Royal Palm Beach Blvd Lamstein Ln FDOT 8D 48,779 N/A N/A 84,1 8,4 349 SOUTHERN BLVD Lamstein Ln SR-7 FDOT 8D 51,263 65,897 72,235 88,7 8, SOUTHERN BLVD SR 7 Sansbury's Way FDOT 8D 38,854 61,147 69,535 77,5 75,8 315 SOUTHERN BLVD Sansbury's Way Pike Rd FDOT 8D 43,644 62,1 72,91 9,2 84, SOUTHERN BLVD Pike Rd Fla Turnpike Entrance FDOT 8D 45,951 56,749 N/A 17,7 82, SOUTHERN BLVD Fla Turnpike Entrance Jog Rd FDOT 8D 39,18 56,858 67,154 75,6 67, SOUTHERN BLVD Jog Rd Haverhill Rd FDOT 8D 32,658 61,432 75,755 38,3 72, SOUTHERN BLVD Haverhill Rd Military Tr FDOT 8D 3,884 64,446 N/A 38,9 78, SOUTHERN BLVD Military Tr Kirk Rd FDOT 8D 26,961 67,71 69,119 51,3 84, SOUTHERN BLVD Kirk Rd Congress Ave FDOT 8D 33,449 58,752 64,71 55,7 69, SOUTHERN BLVD Congress Ave SB Congress Ave NB FDOT 8D 53,584 N/A N/A 67,2 27, SOUTHERN BLVD Congress Ave NB Gem Lake FDOT 8D 53,584 58,349 N/A 46,5 68, SOUTHERN BLVD Gem Lake I-95 FDOT 8D 31,292 51,969 59,983 51,3 48, SOUTHERN BLVD I-95 Parker Ave FDOT 8D 3,197 3,776 31,746 38, 34, SOUTHERN BLVD Parker Ave Dixie Hwy FDOT 5 22,16 22,31 23,1 25,4 24, SOUTHERN BLVD Dixie Hwy Flagler Dr FDOT 5 13,377 11,595 13,44 17,2 1, SOUTHERN BLVD Flagler Dr Ocean Blvd FDOT 2 14,54 12,83 13,634 15,7 11,9 665 SPANISH RIVER BLVD Military Tr IBM Access BR 4 24,618 22,574 25,67 28,2 22,6 635 SPANISH RIVER BLVD IBM Access Perimeter Rd BR 4 22,776 23,173 26,57 21, 22, SPANISH RIVER BLVD Perimeter Rd Old Dixie Hwy BR 4D 21,491 19,254 22,55 33,6 21,8 1/14/215 S:\LRTP\24 LRTP\Modeling\Cost Feasible Plan\24 CF Model Volumes_S65_Update_ xlsx Page 17 of 2

50 Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX E: DATA FROM OTHER APPROVED / PENDING PROJECTS (MINTO WEST, AVENIR, INDIAN TRAILS GROVE) k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc

51 Trip Gen +Internal M+PC 8/13/214 Exhibit 2A Minto West Daily Trip Generation West Side Land Use Residential - SF Residential - MF Apts. Residential - MF Condos. Residential- 55+ Detached Residential- 55+ Attached General Office Research & Devel. Retail Park ITE Code Intensity 21 - DUs 22 - DUs DUs DUs DUs 71 15, SF , SF 82 35, SF Acres Internal Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (2) 1 /DU % 6.65 /DU % 6.65 /DU % 8/DU 2, % 6/DU 1, % Ln (T) =.77Ln (X) , % Ln (T) =.83Ln (X)+3.9 (3) 3, % Ln (T) =.65Ln (X) , % 2.28 /Acre % External Interzonal Trips Trips (4) - -.% - -.% % 1, % % 1, % 3, % 14,564 2, % % External Pass-by Trips Trips (1) New Trips - - % - -. % % 653 1,56 - % 1, % 783 1, % 1,384 2, % 2,534 12,342 3, % 8,8J % 2371 TOTALS 25,375 2,56 9.9% 22,869 2, % 19,929 3,978 15,951 I East Side Land Use Residential- SF (N,O,T,U) Residential - SF IF,M,P,Q,R,Si Residential - MF Condos. Residential - MF Apts. Hotel Community College General Office Research & Devel. Light Industrial Retail Park Community Center Church Daycare TOTALS ITE Code Intensity 21 1,1 DUs 21 2,436 DUs DUs 22 - DUs Rooms 54* 3, Students 71 3, SF , SF 11 45, SF 82 15, SF Acres 495 7, SF 56 7, SF 565 1, SF Internal Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Trips (2) 1 /DU 1,1 1, % 1 /DU 24,36 2, % 6.65 /DU 2, % 6.65 /DU % 8.92 /Room 1, % 2.29 /Student 6,87 1, % Ln (T) =.77Ln (X) , % Ln (T) =.83Ln (X)+3.9 (3) 1, % 6.97 /1 SF 3, % Ln (T) =.65Ln (X) ,839 4, % 2.28 /Acre % /1 SF 2, % 9.11 /1 SF % 74.6 /1 SF % 66,243 13, % External Interzonal External Trips Trips (2) 8, % 21,486 1, % 2, %. -.% % 5, % 2, % 1, % 2, % 4, % 16 -.% 1, % % % 53,187 2,94 4.4% Pass-by Trips Trips (1) New Trips 8,427 - % 8,427 2,34 - % 2,34 2,495 - % 2, % % 615 4,933 - % 4,933 2, % 2,31 1, % 1,182 2, % 2,331 4,27 1, % 2, % 16 1, % 1, % SO% 254 5,247 2,636 47,611 (COMBINED TOTALS I 91,618 I 15,562 I 17.%1 76,56 I 5,88 I 6.4%1 7,176 I 6,614 I I 63,562 I Rate obtained from Palm Beach State College trip generation study by Kimley-Horn. See Appendix B. 111 Source: Palm Beach County ULDC Article 13, unless otherwise noted. 121 Utilized average of individual AM and PM peak hour internalization rates. 131 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 9th Edition. 141 Utilized average of individual AM and PM peak hour internalization rates with adjustments to balance with the east side interzonal trips. [ P~ernalization: 23:4%]

52 ---~---- 2% I -1 1% PCA BOULEVARD 3% 1% 5% 3% 3%.5% I 15.5% 16% 16% 2/o 22.5% 9% 5% 1% N.T.S. NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD 16%1 > > 1.5% ~.5% ~ ~ r 2% 1% TEMPLE BLVD 5~ 5% 4% 3% 2%1 23%.5%.5% 3% 2% ORANGE BOULEVARD 4.5%1 2.5% I % /o 2 \) Q 1% ~ ~ ~ 3% ~ 2%.5%1; < u u ~ 13%.5% 11%.5% ~ ~ if 8% ~ 6th STREET N 2.5% 6% ~ 2% SYCAMORE DRIVE --:J 12% I 1.5% _PERSIMMON l~~o 4o/o 4 % 13 _ 5 % '~-.5% ~~ -Q~5o/o 3.5% ORANGE GROVE BLVD 1m 3.5%.5% ROEBUCK I ROAD 1% I~ I o.5%l.5% Q 3% [ - 5 MILE RADIUS 3% 32%1 22% 19% 13.5% 1% 9.5% 9% I 6% 6% 6.5% ::.;'.5% 8 1% t.5 A 15.5% 11.5% 11.5% - 4%/~ 1 5% ROEBUCK ROAD ~.5% ~ ~ z 1% ~ 1% 1/o 9% 2% 6.5 5% OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD 1% /o -I BELVEDERE ROAD 5% SOUTHERN BOULEVARD %1:;;,,,. P'' ::: 5 5 ' B/12/14 ~ ~ ~ I I I M_I_N_r_o_w-Es-r-~;:, 1 I PROJEi~~~~~R~~uTJoN IIPTci

53 A vemr Concurrency Traffic Study Trip Generation Project trip generation was based on the rates published in the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards (TPS). Rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 9th Edition were used when TPS rates were not available. Trip generation data from Northwood University and Palm Beach State College were used to calculate the trip generation for the proposed University at Avenir Internal Capture In terms capture refers to the satisfaction of trips within the project. In other words, some trips generated by mixed-use projects do not exit the project or enter the major roadway system. Lnternal traffic was estimated based on the methodology of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 684. This methodology estimates morning and afternoon peak- period trips to and from six specific land use categories: office, retail, restaurant, residential, cinema, and hotel Pass-by Trips Some trips generated by the non-residential uses are from existing traffic passing the proposed project and are not newly generated trips. Credit against the trip generation of the proposed project was taken for these trips up to the percentage shown in Article 13, Tmpact Fees. or the ITE Manual. Pass-by traffic does not exceed 25% of the adjacent street traffic. A summary of the project trip generation analysis including internal capture and pass-by trips is shown in Table 2. Detailed analysis is provided in Appendix C. Based on the project, net, new external trips the Radius of Development Lnfluence (RDI) for this analysis is five miles. Table 2 Project Trip Generation Summary Scenario Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total %Internal In Out Total %Internal ITE Trip Generation 78,697 3,34 2,866 6,17 3,425 4,693 8, 118 NCHRP Internal -16, % , % , % Pass-by -4, % % % Net New External Trip Difftrtnct 58,171 2,491 2,242 4,733 2,343 3,431 5,774 Page -l

54 I 5 I OS e NORTH I..'. PJ{~),r~ r LiH.\l it). IJ!:? _, :o -...."'. ~-- ::::...;_..:.:..._~-+-:-:-t I I 5 c.. "' - "' "'... rt Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., Inc. Traffic Eng1neering, Transportation Planning 969 SE Federal H1ghway Suite 42 Stuart. Flonda Tel FIGURE- 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AVENIR APRIL 16, 215 6

55 INDIAN TRAILS GROVE 7/15/215 Revised 8/28/215 TABLE 11 - Dailv Traffic Generation ~. ~t...., ~~;."t; Lanciluse TEST 2 - TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS -~f~~~~l:l;ilt!~!il Singie Family Detached 2i I 5!Dwelling Units 1 J Grand Totals: TABLE 12- AM Peak Hour T1raffic Generation ITE ~>r::... Lanf.tuse Code lntem_sity RatetE~.u :atien Single Family Detached 21 5!Dwelling Units.75 I Grand Totals: Dir~Sptit! ' l19~~ - I Dlrspnt. ' ln I Out o.25 I o.75 " "il;:: o: Qt.~~~ Trips 5, 5, Gress Trips In Out Total TABLE.13- PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation I'I!E,. :,.. Land.use e~ ln_ten'i~v. Rate,f;E,qu~ti~JI' Singie t-amily Detached 2i 5!Dwelling Units Ln(T) -.9 Ln(X) +.51 I Grand Totals: D.iiSJOJit In t O!Jt: o.63 1 o.37 Gross Trips l.m J-t Total ~:~ocuments\projects\ GL WesfiConcurreny T raffle Study_August.215 Submittatllndian Trails Grove Traffic RSIMM()~TE

56 SIMMO~ITE ENBINUIIINI I naniiinil I C:ONIULTINB I SINCE AuthorfzGtlon No M.tr-ttre Blvd w..t Sulta 3 Wnt Palm Beach, florldo.»47 (5111) 478-~..., 8 NORlHl.AKE Cl...J... Cl BOULEVARD => ~I ~ => => TEMPLE ~ BOULEVARD ~ ~ ~ ~ i!:.~ ORANGE BOULEVARD..J!3 z ajjs (.) ~ (.) 6TH STREET Cl ~~ -::. ID N 4 N.T.S. s PERSIMMON BOULEVARD MINTO WEST PROJECT DISTRIBUTION L_j 2-MILE RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCE ~~!5! ::::J5VI~ (.) SYCAMORE DRIVE SOUTHERN c.. ~IS 3% za:::a::: 5i! OKEECHOBEE ~ a::: a::: ID... 8 BOULEVARD BOULEVARD FIGURE 5 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION-TEST 2 ANALVSIS (5-YEAR BVILDOUT - 5 SF HOMES) Cl ~!ill Cl ~I a::: (.) INDIAN TRAILS GROVE BK REVISED

57 INDIAN TRAILS GROVE 7{1~15 Re'o'ised TEST 2 FIVE YEAR BULDOUT (22) 2 MILE RADIUS' AREAWIDE GROWTH RATE= TOT<ll. AM PEAK HOUR PRo.ECT TRIPS (ENTERING) '"'--~ ;:.-~?~7j~if;t~'. 1r ' RONJWAY - FROM.,.,.; ~... \;~ 3.3% TO ' <,:., WbUZ AM PEAK HOUR TEST ;, ( All PEAK :'i>; AM~:. :~:-. ;. FUU >;. P=~ :; '' :.,,.5% e HOUR PBQJECT PROJECT MAJOR MINTO i_': TRAFFIC"'. BACKGROU_ND DIIU;GTIOH TRN:FIC 1 DISTRIBI:IJIOH TRJiiS PROJECif' TRAFFIC ' 5121., TRAFFIC = ~:: " i TOTAL WIDE ' BACKGROUND ~(I) GROWTH 22 BCKOD ;~:- 22 ~.~. -~ TRAFJ;IC ' ' TOTAL "ASSURED ~;rf~~~~- ~~~~TS WIO PR(i)J TRAFFIC LANES CI:ASS LOSE STD. 6TH STREET SEMlNOLE PRA IT WHITNEY ROAD OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEV ARC SITE NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD 6TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SYCAMORE DRIVE SEMINOLE PRATI WHITNEY"' TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD 6TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SYCAMORE DRIVE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SOUTHERN BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRA IT WHITNEY ROAD BROAD BROAD ' ROAD'" FROAO SEMlNOLE PRA IT W HITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE EB ' WB NB NB NB NB SB NB SB NB SB SB EB EB EB EB 36 1' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' % ' ' ' ' ' I 88 2 I 88 4D I I I II ' II I I VUNI /UNI 27 4 I I 88 2 UNI UNI I YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES Notes: (1) Tote! BackorOI..nd Trame equals 11M h~ d lhe erea wide g1 fth rl!lteu,,., beci<.qround ;f"oiiiiiith plus CctMiitftld trips fmdudw'ia Minto Wnt). (2) M'nb West buildout is 235. (3) Due to the~~ buildout, this segment CCJ'Isidered unlnwuppb!d flon (4)CcluntsderiwedfrDrl'ltumingmcMif1'l«ltCCli.Jnt (5)TobeccnMI'V81foM, lhemafor pn:lject lrlfr.;-~asaumed lobe lhe- ful bulldoutwi1h lhetllci:eplion dminlowesl X:\Documents\PROJECTS\214\1 oh>98 GL Wnt\Ca~eurreny Tr.tftc Sludy_August.215 Submlit81\lndian Trill Is GrOY8 Trefflc Repctt AUQU&t.211S B.K.. SI.'-IMc.>Ns.:..~ wurn: -~: :..;; :: ::.-.; ;:..: ;. :::,,,;;

58 INDIAN TRAILS GROVE R8Yised TEST 2 FIVE YEAR BUILDOUT (22} 2 MILE RADIUS AREAWIDE GROWTH RATE= TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIPS (ENTERING} TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIPS (EXITING) 3.8% ; ~, - --:'~:,...!_._, wi; ROADWAY FROM ll 6TH STREET SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD Notes: (1) TotGi Background Tr.rHc equais the higher d!he aree 'Nido gro...th rate or 1% background grcjnth plus c<rnmitled trips (Including Mrtto West). (2) Mhto Wast buildout is 235. (3) t:lu8 to the 5-year bujidout, ltlis &eglflwit comk:ieii"''!!d ~St lnteruppted flow (4) Cc:I.Jnts detiwcl from turning n"!cmmmenl count (5) To becmserv.rtlve, the fnior project tratl\c was assumed to be the scme as fi.ai bulldoul wtth the excep(k:ln d Minto Wasl TABLE18 PM PEAK HOUR TEST 2?r:~,- : PM 2 ~ :-: ~~-;~~~;-~_~-:.:_4,~ p:~~:\.~!;:~-~~;:,;~-~~,~~ FULL p= ~ ~;~.5% ;-:.~,X~-1!Roae: ~~~~~ TOTAL ~-~-~# a:z:o -~f! 22 ~:{':~lu "', " ' H,UR PROJECT PROJECT ~ MAJOR ~--~ MINTO TRAFFICPI BACKGROUND WIDE BACKGROUND i. TRAFFIC '' TOTAL ASSURED TO DIRECTION TRAFFIC IISTRIBUTIDI TRIPS PROJECl'" TRAFFIC (512} TRAFFIC GROWTH TRAFFIC 111 WID PROJ TRAFFIC LANES CLASS "'.-..~..,... >~~ ;1! :;:;, MEETS LOS LOSE STD. SITE ' ' SEMINOLEPRATTWHITNEY'' 1 ~~ r- ~:~ -;=. ;-:-~:_- -~g-- :, g. g- : ~-' :- ~- ~ ----:-.: ~.,,_,,, ~~ : ~ ~ -.: - = ~~ NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD TEMPLE BOULEVARD SB % YES TEMPLE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD SB % YES ORANGE BOULEVARD 6TH STREET SB 665 3% D I 196 YES 6TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD ~~ ~~ ~: ' ;~~ ~~ ~ ~~ c - ' I ~~ ;~ ;;~ ' ; ~~ ' ;~~~ :g ::, ~:~g ~~~ PERSIMMON BOULEVARD NB I T 87 7% D I 196 YES isycamore DRIVE SB 626 7% D I 196 YES NB ~--,w o----~ /UNI 27 YES SYCAMORE DRIVE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SB 545 7% D 1/UNI 27 YES OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SOUTHERN BOULEVARD NB 64 35% D I 196 YES EB ~ _ y e I 88 YES 'SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD jb ROAD WB 528 3% " ' I 88 YES 'ROAD(!) WB 528 3% UNI 144 YES WB =t 75 3% ~ UNI 144 YES LE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD (14TH AVENUE WB % D I 196 YES X:\Doc..ment.s\PROJECTS\214\14-96 Gl West\Ccncurmny Traffic Sludy_Augusl215 Subm\ttal\1ndan Trails Gro>.te Tnrft'lc Report August.215 B.K. ~!~~ ~~)~'-P~

59 6/1/215 Revised: 7/16/215 INDIAN TRAILS GROVE LUPA TRAFFIC STUDY Source: Indian Trails Grove LUPA Traffic Study, Simmons & White, Inc., 7/16/15 TABLE 1 - Daily Traffic Generation 13,14 1 Single Family Detached 21 1,314 Single Family Detached 21 ~.315 Church/Synagogue , , Gen. Commercial 1 13, , Ln(T) =.65 Ln(X) Dwelling Units Dwelling Units S.F. S.F. 11,54 51,323 Grand Totals: TABLE 2 - AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation.... ITE Land use b... " Code,. f: : >s::~" :'.'.i ~. :t~&-;~t;;~ rr~~}.@:fe,~.\:.:;~,\ }:~ ;~};:ir~:;.~' lntensit~ ~i,~ >t~ ;~ ~~- '' 1~'1 R~te/E~uati~~ :)tj~}~3i Dir Split Gross Trips In Out., In \ Out Total Single Family Detached 21 1,314 Dwelling Units Single Family Detached 21 1,314 Dwelling Units Single Family Detached 21 1,315 Dwelling Units Church/Synagogue Gen. Commercial 56 42,689 S.F , S.F ,311 3,198 Grand Totals: 24 TABLE 3 - PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation.. ''''?~! Land use.. ITE Code ~~; 1 \. Pv! Intensity.~g " ' "1J~~:~ <.... ;c\~.:..~?~rate/equation Dir Split In Out Gross Trips.;., In Out Total Single Family Detached 21 1,314 Dwelling Units Ln(T) , ,314 Dwelling Units Ln(T) ,67 Single Family Detached 21 1,315 =.9 Ln(X) +.51 =.9 Ln(X) +.51 Ln(T) =.9 Ln(X) Single Family Detached ,68 Church/Synagogue Gen. Commercial ,689 S.F , S.F Ln(X) ,32 2,523 1,734 4,257 Dwelling Units Ln(T) = Grand Totals: ~ X:\Documents\PROJECTS\214\14-96 GL West\LUPA Traffic Study_ Resubmittal\lndian Trails_Lupa_ B.K. SIMMO~S'&wt-ITE '"'1-.lll!l'lllt: 1 o~~~"ltij 1 ta~t:u ~r4 ttt. t t.illiltf Itt~

60 6/1/215 Revised : 7/16/215 INDIAN TRAILS GROVE LUPA TRAFFIC STUDY Source: Indian Trails Grove LUPA Traffic Study, Simmons & White, Inc., 7/16/15 TABLE 4- Dailv Traffic Generation Land use Single Family Detached Church/Synagoguec Gen. Commercial ITE Code ~ , , ,54 51,323 S.F. Grand Totals: 389 9,763 47,841 1,741 3,482 1,764 1,764.% 15.3% 3.4% 7,999 46,77 TABLE 5 - AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation. Landuse Single Family Detached Church/Synagogue Gen. Commercial ITE Code ~-, Intensity 3,943 42, , '"~;f~lt~ Gross Trips, In ' Out Total Dwelling Units S.F. S.F. Grand Totals: 2, ,311 2, ,198 Internalization Out Total ~ In '' '!f~.~c, -' % ;.: 1.1%.% 15.3% 2.1% External Trips ;;r~; :,, Local Capture"' ~,,,,,,~,~; In > Out Trips In Out Total , ,278 2, ,132.%.% 11.6%.8% ~ Net Trips I In '' Out Total , ,17 TABLE 6- PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Land use Single Family Detached Church/Synagogue Gen. Commercial ITE Code lnte~~ity.'),, ;}~,\:;! 3,943 42, , Gross Trips ~":Zl,lnternalization ~:;~~: -. In Out Total Yo ' In ''' Out Total 2, Grand Totals: 2,523 Dwelling Units S.F. S.F., 1, ,7~ 3,22 7.7% 23.% 1, % 4,257-1!.6% External Trips In Out Total 1,834 1,121 2, ,265 1,475 3,74 ~ft- ~\Locr~ ~a~~;e< 1 lt;:~~\.%.% 19.1% 4.6% Net Trips : :.:. In Out Total , , ,566 Notes: (1) Local capture indicates the trip interaction between the Indian Trails commercial use and the residential lots west of Seminole Pratt Whitney Road and north of 6th Street North. A modified internal capture calculation was conducted to estimate these trips. (2) Net trips indicate trips that travel to the external thoroughfare roadway network (Seminole Pratt Whitney Road). ~~.~, X:\Documents\PROJECTS\214\14-96 GL West\LUPA Traffic Study_ Resubmittal\lndian Trails_Lupa_ B.K. ' - ~- -WHITE '\, SIMMONS('\. t~j.hihiii\111 I ~~~'ll~lltl I tll"f\ll,t >IU I :t 191~

61 z~~ lmi.l :W~Q ~lnll'i 3SVHO::Ilc1331S avo~ srnw.:1 lsioh38 AVM ~ 18SNVS L a~a:nnos SIB I a~a:nnos ~ ~ co ~ ~ :::> ~ ~ ffi@ ~ "' ~ i:;j CO N 31VlS ~ AVM lvoolim ~ co l'ilvd lvaml a~a:nnos OOOM!S3~o a~a:nnos \!V llih AVM>I~d ls3m Sl'ilVd 153!IO.:I 3:M:U. 3n18 :>18 :w~ ls3!!ql S>INI8 ~ I~.NS A!I!Nnoo NOn w u z w ~ ~!Z w "- "' '3 z ~ 5 co (/}!" ::> V> i'5 ~ B ~ ~~~

62 SIMM~TE ~- ~Hn ", ~n,. -, C~IOIIH!IIOI I i"tn CE, Author!~ lolc :581 ~ntr 8"-d YtQl S\IItll 3 w..t Polrn &.«h. F'l«<do 3347 (581) (;;;'\ ASSIGNMENT REGIONAL PARK ~ e SITE ACCESS (22%) -@ ASSIGNMENT FUTURE Q Q NORTHLAKE BLVD PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL '..:::y ~ HAMUN BLVD 18X _j ~X... ORANGE BLVD ax 1 lj:i _j... 1r... 1r ""' IDtPLE ORANGE BLVD J N.T.S. * 15% OVERAUL MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENT MINTO jt(~ OTH STREET 3ll_j~ 1 2,;-~ 32ll t ~MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENT ~I TOWN CENTER PARKWAY PERSit.lt.ION BOULEVARD MINTO WEST TRIP ASSIGNMENTS ~ D.. PROJECT DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 18 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION ~ ~I Vl INDIAN TRAILS GROVE BK

63 INDIAN TRAILS GROVE LUPA TRAFFIC STUDY ðêñðïñîðïë 못¼æ ðéñïêñîðïë TABLE 7 (YEAR 24) MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY- NET INCREASE PROJECT: INDIAN TRAILS EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE: RR-1/AP TRIPS PER DAY= 3,65 PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE: RR-1.25 TRIPS PER DAY= 46,77 TRIP INCREASE= 42,427 MINTO WEST PREVIOUS APPROVAL: MINTO WEST CURRENT APPROVAL: tiel Daily Trips( 2 J 35,831 63, ROADWAY FROM DISTRIBUTION PROJECT TO %1 TRAFFIC 24 COST FEASIBLE LOS "D" TRIP PROJECT LAI\IES CAPACITY INCREASE SIGNIFICANCE( 1 l SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 6TH STREET ORANGE BOULEVARD ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD COCONUT BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD - ORANGE BOULEVARD - 6TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SYCAMORE DRIVE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD ORANGE AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD - 7% 2,97 6TH STREET 11% 4,667 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD -- 38% 16,122 SYCAMORE DRIVE 28% 11,88 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD 24% 1,183 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD 15% BROAD 8% TH AVENUE 5% 2,121 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 5% 2,121 14TH AVENUE 14% 5,94 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 13% TH AVENUE 9% 3,818 COCONUT BOULEVARD 7% 2,97 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 5% 2,121 6TH STREET 5% 2,121 ORANGE BOULEVARD 1% 424 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 1% TH AVENUE 21% 8,91 - COCONUT BOULEVARD 21% 8,91 - IBIS ROAD 22% D 33,2 8.95% YES 4D 33,2 14.6% YES 4D 33, % YES 4D 33, % YES 4D 33,2 3.67% YES 4D % YES 4D % YES 2 15, % YES 2 15, % YES 2 15,2 39.8% YES % YES 2 15, % YES 2 15, % YES 2 15, % YES 4D 33,2 6.39% YES 2 15,2 2.79% NO 2 15,2 2.79% NO 4D 33, % YES 4D 33, % YES 4D % YES - ROADWAY SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 6TH STREET ORANGE BOULEVARD ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD COCONUT BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD FROM NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD - 6TH STREET PERSIMMON BOULEVARD SYCAMORE DRIVE OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD ORANGE BOULEVARD NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD ORANGE AVENUE SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD 14TH AVENUE COCONUT BOULEVARD 24 PBC MPO TRAFFIC JISTRIBUTim PROJECT TO VOLUME 1%1 TRAFFIC - MINTO TRIP ASSIGN. NEW MINTO TRIPS( 2 l TOTAL 24 TRAFFIC ORANGE BOULEVARD 3, 7% 2,97 2% 5,546 38,516 6TH STREET 26,3 11% 4,667 27% 7,487 38,454 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD -- 35,7 38% 16,122 32% 8,874 6,696 SYCAMORE DRIVE 35,7 28% 11,88 38% 1,538 58,117 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD 37, 3% 12,728 33% 9,151 58,879 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD % % BROAD % % TH AVENUE 13, 5% 2,121 18% 4,992 2,113 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD % % TH AVENUE 2 14% 5,94 % 6,14 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 9 15% % TH AVENUE 8,6 9% 3,818 3% ,25 COCONUT BOULEVARD 9,2 7% 2,97 2.5% ,863 ROYAL PALM BEACH BOULEVARD 124 5% % TH STREET 194 5% % ORANGE BOULEVARD 1,3 1% 424 5% 1,387 12,111 PERSIMMON BOULEVARD 6,9 1% 424 2% 555 7,879 14TH AVENUE 18,1 21% 8,91 16% 4,437 31,447 - COCONUT BOULEVARD - 32, 21% 8,91 16% 4,437 45,347 IBIS ROAD 33,3 22% 9,334 2% 5,546 48,18 LOS "D" VIC LANES CAPACITY RATIO 4D 33, D 33, D 33, D 33, D 33, D D ( 3 ) 33, , , , D , ,2.52 4D 33,2.95 4D 33, D 33, Notes: 1) Project is significant when net trip increase is greater than 1% for v/c of 1.4 or more, 2% for v/c of 1.2 or more and 3% for v/c less than ) The 24 PBC MPO mcxlel volumes did not account for the newly approved Minto West plan of development. Therefore, the difference between the new approval and the previous approved Minto West trips were induded in this analysis. Note that this methodology provides a conservative analysis since it does not reflect any diversions created by the introduction of the significant non-residentails uses in the area. 3) Per Minto West approval.

64 Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX F: PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE-YEAR ROAD PROGRAM k:\wpb_tpto\141\1419- iota carol\iota documents\cpa\ iota carol cpa.doc

65 General note on interest projections: Projections for interest earnings assume that average cash balances will approximate 3. times the current year revenue projections at an interest rate of 3% in FY 216 thru FY 22. Interest earnings on gas taxes are shown on this sheet. Interest earnings on impact fees remain within each impact fee area and are not shown above. A FDOT (anticipates CIGP funds) up to $2,88, for right-of-way acquisition of Congress Ave., N. of Northlake Blvd. to Alt. A-1-A in FY 217. FDOT (anticipates CIGP funds) up to $35, for construction of Northlake Blvd. and Military Trail Intersection in FY 217. Additional funds include $7,, from the Atlantic Ave. Agreement.

66 Page 2 of 5 PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE YEAR ROAD PROGRAM- EXHIBIT A ($'sin 1,'8) Annual Update- Adopted- December 15, 215 PROJECT LIMITS DESCRIPTION FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase 6th Ave. S. over Lake Osborne Dr. Bridge Replacement 1,2 DIR R 6, c 45th. Street E. of Haverhill Rd. tow. of Military Trail.1 mi, 6 L 5 D 5 R Admin. Support/Equipment Countywide Staff support and Computer Equip. for Program 37 p 37 p 37 p 37 p 37 p Annual Contract Advertising Countywide Advertising 2 p 2 p 2 p 2 p 2 p Atlantic Ave. Florida's Turnpike Intersection Improvements 1,5 c Australian Ave. Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Intersection Improvements Australian Ave. W 1th St. to 33' N ofw 13th. St Intersection Improvements 1 R/C --- Benoist Farms Rd. S.R. 8 to Belvedere Rd..9 mi, 3 L 72 DIR.!Z!!... _ I -- 1,5 c 7 R 5,2 c Boynton Beach Blvd. Florida's Turnpike Southbound Entrance/Exit Intersection Improvements Camino Real Rd./Boca Club over Intracoastal Waterway Bridge Rehabilitation Center St. Thelma Ave. to Woodland Estates Dr..3 mi, 3 L 8 c --- Church St. Limestone Creek Rd. tow. of Central Blvd..5 mi, 3 L 2 RIM 1,2 c Clint Moore Rd. over LWDD E-4 Canal E. of Congress Ave. to E. of L.W.D.D. E-4 Canal.3 mi, 6 L (Bridge Replacement) 15 D 1 R 1,5 c Congress Ave. over W.P.B. "F" Canal N. of Okeechobee Blvd. to Ware Dr..1 mi, 5 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 5 R 5 c -- Congress Ave. Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Intersection Improvements 4 R 2, c --- Congress Ave. N. of Northlake Blvd. to Alt. A-1-A.6 mi, 2 L & 3 L 5,76 RIM 5, c Connector Lyons Rd. to Acme Dairy Rd..5 mi, 2/3 L 1,25 c Coral Ridge Dr. S. County Regional Park N. Entrance to 75' N..1 mi, 2 L 8 c CR 88 (Old SR 8 ) Rehabilitationll-leavy Maintenance Rehabilitation 1, c 1, c 1, c 1, c CR 88 (Old SR 8 ) over C-51 Canal Bridge Replacement 2,2 c Drexel Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-2 Canal Fair Green Rd. to 15th Ln. N..1 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 7 c Flavor Pict Rd. S.R. 7 to Lyons Rd. 1. mi, 2 L 6 DIR 4,5 c Florida Mango Rd. over LWDD L-9 &. L-1 Canals I 1th Ave. North to Edgewater Drive.9 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacements) 65 DIR 1 R 3,3 c Florida Mango Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-8 Canal Edgewater Drive to Barbados Rd..6 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement) 5 R 1,6 c Florida Mango Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-6 Canal N. of Myrica Rd. to Summit Blvd..5 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 1 R -- 1,9 c Garden Rd. over FOOT Canal S. of FOOT Canal to S of Blue Heron Blvd..3 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 1,2 c Gateway Blvd. Military Trail Intersection Improvements 5 R 1,1 c I 6, DIM/C 81 p *See Footnotes, Phase(s): S- Study; D=Design; M=Mitigation; R=RIVV Acq.; C=Construction; P=Payment

67 Page 3 of 5 PALM BEACH COUNTY FIVE YEAR ROAD PROGRAM- EXHIBIT A ($'sin 1,'8) Annual Update- Adopted- December 15, 215 PROJECT LIMITS DESCRIPTION FY 216 FY 217 FY 218 FY 219 FY 22 Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Cost Phase Gateway Blvd. High Ridge Rd Intersection Improvements 1 R 1,6 c Glades Area R&R Throughout the Glades Rep ai r/r e co nstru ctio n 7 c 7 c 7 c 7 c 7 c Glades Rd. Butts Rd. Intersection Improvements 1 RIP 3 C/P Haverhill Rd. Lantana Rd. to S. of LWDD L-14 Canal.9 mi, 4 L 3,5 c Haverhill Rd. S. of LWDD L-14 Canal to Lake Worth Rd. 1.3 mi, 5 L 8,8 RIM/C Haverhill Rd. N. of Caribbean Blvd. to Bee Line Hwy. 1.6 mi, 5 L 5 DIM/C 9, c Hood Rd. E. of Florida's Turnpike tow. of Central Blvd. 1.2 mi, 4L 6,4 c Hood Rd. Central Blvd. Intersection Improvements 2 RIM 1, c Indiantown Rd. Jupiter Fanns Rd. Intersection Improvements 75 c Jog Rd. S. of Clint Moore Rd., to Linton Blvd. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 1,5 c Jog Rd. S. of Hypoluxo Rd. to 1th Ave. N. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 2,1 c Jog Rd. Roebuck Rd. Intersection Improvements 92 D/C Kirk Rd. over L.W.D.D. L-7 Canal S. of L.W.D.D. L-7 Canal to Pot O'Gold St..1 mi, 3 L (Bridge Replacement- Culvert) 8 c Lake Worth Rd. Linton Blvd. Jog Rd. Military Tr. Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Lyons Rd. Hillsboro Canal to S.W. 18th Street.3 mi, 6 L 2, c -- Lyons Rd. Clint Moore Rd. to Atlantic Ave. 3. mi, 4 L 1 D 9,7 c Lyons Rd. Lantana Rd. ton. of L.W.D.D. L-14 Canal.9 mi, 4 L 6,12 c 38 R 63 c I 1,5 c Lyons Rd. N. of L.W.D.D. L-14 Canal to Lake Worth Rd. 1.1 mi,4l 4 D/R 5, c -- Lyons Rd. Lake Worth Rd. to S. of L.W.D.D. L-11 Canal.5 mi, 3 L 25 D 2,5 c Lyons Rd. S. of L.W.D.D. L-11 Canal ton. of L.W.D.D. L-1 Canal.6 mi, 2/3 L 1 p Northlake Blvd. E. of Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd. to E. of Hall Blvd. 1. mi,4l 1 D 3, c Northlake Blvd. E. of Hall Blvd. to Coconut Blvd. 2.4 mi, 4 L 2, RIM 9,2 c -- Northlake Blvd. S.R. 71 to Military Tr. Safety Improvements & Resurfacing 1,5 c Northlake Blvd. Military Tr. Intersection Improvements 1, c -- Okeechobee Blvd. Church St. Intersection Improvements 1, R 1,2 c Old Dixie Hwy. Yamato Rd. to Linton Blvd. 3. mi, 3 L 2, RIM 1,35 c *See Footnotes, Phase(s): S- Study; D=Design; M=Mitigation; R=RIVV Acq.; C=Construction; P=Payment