Master Plan for Improvements For

Transcription

1 Master Plan for Improvements For Cress Creek Country Club Naperville, Illinois January 2013 Prepared by

2 Contents Introduction, Purpose & Direction p. 3-4 Course Elements Observations & Direction p Hole-by-Hole Remarks p Practice Areas p Random Comments p Summary and Conclusions p Golf Course Life Cycle Chart p. 65 General Priorities Moving Forward p. 66 2

3 Introduction Cress Creek Country Club was established in 1963, originally designed by golf course architect, David Gill. Over the course of time, the course received further influence through the efforts of Dick Nugent, ASGCA and Rick Jacobsen, ASGCA, both established Chicago-based golf course architects. In 2008 and 2009 the course took on a substantial facelift at the hand of noted Philadelphia based architect, Ron Pritchard. As I understand and have observed, the primary force behind Mr. Pritchard s effort at that time was to improve the bunkering and rebuild the tees. The course that we see today is much the same, if not identically so; exactly as Mr. Pritchard left it upon completion. In looking at the layout, it can be generally characterized as a typical parkland layout, not unlike most surrounding courses in the Chicago area. Cress Creek is laid out on gently contoured terrain with some tree framework (mostly planted) and numerous man-made water features. The course follows a two loop, returning nine configuration that is arranged within a residential neighborhood. The holes are generally well spaced within a core, with the exception of a seven-hole loop on the front nine and a four-hole loop on the back that are separated from the core by a main arterial and also a secondary residential street that access the club and surrounding neighborhood. The perimeter of the course is entirely fronted by residential homes and/or apartments. The primary focus of this Master Plan for Improvements is therefore intended to serve as a comprehensive analysis of the existing golf facilities at Cress Creek Country Club and to provide a suggested way forward. Together with research from my visit on December 10 and 11, 2012, my prior findings in a previously submitted reported dated June 22, 2012 and independent feedback from Superintendent Elliott Dowling and his committee, the following information has been assembled. Observations and recommendations are provided on a holeby-hole basis along with a number of general topic assessments. Purpose of the Master Plan It is our collective intent to utilize the following information in creating a concise road map for the future, including an overall practical approach to improvements that are directed toward enhancement of the golf course as it exists today at Cress Creek. In other words, identify and follow a consistent vision that will continue to address the specific needs of the Club. To that end, the report shall identify and prioritize certain efforts or projects that may be deemed most reasonable, attainable or are most impacting in meeting the Club s expressed vision. This Master Plan is not intended to insinuate or suggest that the course in any way needs to be renovated or significantly altered for any reason in fact; we should avoid that consideration completely. Rather, the approach is for the plan to serve as a guide for the future by identifying an undeviating plan for on-going improvement to and management of the facilities. In all cases, though, suggested improvements shall expressly complement the original (most recent) design and simply make it better and make Cress Creek an even more efficient, manageable and enjoyable facility. Direction As we discussed in our initial meeting, this report will focus on observations and general suggestions for practical improvement. It is understood that the members generally favor the 3

4 course but that factors of difficulty and playability have been a consistent concern since the course s was renovated in Wherever subtle design refinements can be incorporated that have a positive affect on speed of play or reasonably lessening the difficulty of the course without drastic modification, they will be considered. In the same vein, this assessment will identify opportunities for more strategic options and varied recovery alternatives to create more opportunities for players and make the game more fun. Therefore, this assessment will identify a variety of considerations to make the course more playable and more enjoyable, and as a result more manageable from the maintenance side. Practice areas are another focus from our discussion, including their positioning, makeup, character, effectiveness and intended use in the overall golf experience. Too, is the importance of their appearance and presentation how the facilities fit within the framework of the golf course. Where they can be improved, the players will gain tremendous benefit and the Club will realize increased value. Maintenance is another primary matter in all that is considered. Today we are working together with superintendents and green committees to maximize efficiency and realize values. Together we will identify opportunities for improvement and efficiencies intended for the Club s overall benefit. Bottom line: the golf course should be maintainable within reasonable efforts and budget. Any area or issue that is out of alignment should be examined for a better alternative. The last item of emphasis is identity. This involves everything that is substantive and visual on or around the course. There should be a vision for the course and its framework a way that it is best presented, and with supreme sensitivity placed toward whom the course is purposed for the primary users. Together we will confirm this vision, which is essentially the Club s ultimate identity, and what efforts may follow, reinforce or enhance the proper golf experience for Cress Creek. With this understanding, we can move forward into the body of the Plan and continue to examine how we might further develop and validate the identity and vision for the course throughout it s many facets. 4

5 Course Elements - Observations This is a brief summary of the course components as I am aware of them at present, including characteristics and conditions that contribute to the presentation of the course today and ultimately define the experience at Cress Creek. Greens The greens at Cress Creek are largely the original surfaces that were built in There have been some modifications to some of the green edges (to achieve a more classic shape and create additional cupping areas), and perhaps more significant contouring modifications on #15. Those re-contouring efforts and expansions seem to have been conducted without too much effort given to achieving seamless tie-ins to the internal surfacing or the perimeters. As a result, some of the mowing turns are quite tight (mainly in the corners). Additionally, most of the expansions don t provide the benefit that was apparently intended, which is additional cupping areas (as the expansions are too small and lack continuity with the surrounding gradients). The greens are elevated pads of push-up style construction, which was typical of that era. No internal subdrainage exists within the makeup of each green, which contributes to a slow draining soil profile. The key take here is: the greens do not drain particularly well. Their design/positions are mostly suitable as sited. There is an occasional quick slope here and there, which can be amplified by speed (height of cut). Most of the greens are of a typical and consistent size, regardless of the hole character, totaling 2.75 acres in area. Tees The tees are generally in good condition, as they were part of the renovation conducted in At that time, tees were apparently raised, repositioned and constructed in a more formal and traditional rectilinear fashion. In an effort to address certain playability shortcomings, the Club has experimented with some intermediate or additional forward tee positions over the past few years. These positions were apparently well received and allowed for better playability and enjoyment from a variety of players mainly the shorter hitters. Part of this assessment will take into consideration the variety of tee placements in relation to various skill levels, as well as size, alignment, elevation and placement of the tees. Currently there are 3.0 acres of maintained tee surface on the course. Some of the tee complexes are of questionable size or surface area, which leads to excessive wearing of the turf and a less than ideal presentation. Bunkers There are 93 bunkers at Cress Creek, which is perhaps slightly on the high side when compared to the average on most comparable courses, especially among upscale, family oriented private clubs. That number is up from bunkers as a result of the recent renovation effort. During the renovation, the bunker style received significant aesthetic enhancement a primary goal of the project. In addition to the more numerous positioning of bunkers, their characteristics were made much bolder, with steeper faces and deeper, concave floors. They are formidable hazards on the course, to say the very least some are perhaps too severe for the average player. The bunkers have an attractive appearance overall, though some of the more severe examples present a challenge for maintenance (accessing the sand floors for raking and mowing of the steep facing banks). Some of the bunkers are also very difficult to access by the players - lacking an at-grade entry point. The bunkers seem to drain fairly effectively but the local Antioch root zone sand is void of any real desirable 5

6 characteristics (color, texture and physical make-up). The sand should be closely monitored, as its effective life span is only expected to be in the range of 5 7 years in most cases. For the most part, the positioning of the bunkers is consistent with the original 63 layout, I am told, with some refinements (and certainly additions) executed in We will examine the validity and placement, as well the characteristics, size and arrangement of just a few, select bunkers in the body of this report. The focus will be mainly on how the bunkering affects playability, and in some cases, circulation, particularly around the greens. Fairways When considering the fairways, one should focus on the strategy and presentation of the hole. Placement, alignment, width, and relationship to features are all considerations, as is appearance. The fairways at Cress Creek are certainly one of the perceived weaknesses on the course, as their condition is complicated by the fact that there are no fewer than six grass types that comprise the makeup of the fairway turf, including Kentucky bluegrass, poa annua, poa trivialis, bentgrass, perennial rygrass and fescue. Obviously, these grass varieties all possess certain innate and varied characteristics that give them each a distinctive value and appearance in the landscape. On a golf course, and particularly in a focus area such as fairways, they unfortunately appear like a calico cat! But also, the management of these turf types differs greatly, and under conditions that are presented throughout a normal season. It s a constant moving target for the superintendent and his staff to address. Otherwise, the fairways are generally well drained and lead toward a great opportunity for improvement in health, consistency and appearance. The overall area of fairways at Cress Creek is approximately 30 acres, which is consistent with the normal course average, though we will look into ways that the fairway allocation can be improved in terms of strategic placement within certain golf holes. Rough The balance of fairway and rough on the course appears to be in order, from both the playability and appearance side at Cress Creek. The overall health of the maintained roughs is somewhat compromised in places, mainly because of trees/shade (lack of light penetration to the ground plane), roots and isolated cart and foot traffic. Our efforts will focus on ways that the health and appearance of the rough can be enhanced. Paths and Bridges As we have studied and reported in past consulting efforts, the cart paths at Cress Creek present a great opportunity for improvement. Both their physical condition and their placement and alignment are to be held in question at present. We will outline where paths can be extended or realigned to become better accessible or to provide a more suitable avenue to a tee or green. In some cases the paths can be realigned to be less intrusive visually on holes. Eventually, the paths (which are built with asphalt) will have to be replaced or at minimum, resurfaced. The life expectancy of an asphalt path is only 5-10 years. Throughout the course, there is evidence of the paths degrading and crumbling. This leads to uneven driving surfaces, paths holding water and edges on the turns being worn away into mud. Of consideration should also be the width of paths, presently at only 7. During the recent renovation, it seems that cart paths, or even the consideration of the golf cart, was given little if any consideration. The reality is, however, that the golf cart is here to stay and very much part of what the golfing members at Cress Creek desire as part of their 6

7 experience. Also is the consideration by the Club of the income that can be anticipated through cart rentals. With these factors in mind, solutions will be considered that offer the best overall treatment in terms of materials and aesthetic appearance, as well as path location and integration. Also of note, the cart bridges on the course should be considered in any long-range plan, as their life expectancy has limits. Consider their size, application and their characteristics as elements in the landscape. Water Features Composed mostly of man-made ponds and a stream course, the golf experience is certainly influenced by the presence of water and water transfer systems. Strategically, the water hazards are in play on a number of holes, but usually with some degree of option for the player to consider. The main concern for the existing water features is the continued maintenance of the banks and edges where erosion is present. In the case of these occurrences, the erosion is present when there is regular water level fluctuation in the ponds, which exposes the banks and is loosened with the constant exposure to both air and water. The bank erosion can be further exacerbated by the presence and activity of waterfowl. As ducks and geese enter and exit the pond along the banks, traffic patterns can develop that contribute to existing or new erosion. Also of note, I have inquired about the name of the Club Cress Creek Country Club and its origin. To my surprise, there is no presence of a Cress Creek on the property. Trees and Landscaping Cress Creek features an arrangement of typical parkland course vegetation mostly in the form of deciduous trees that are common to the surrounding landscape. The framework of existing vegetation is, in large part, a result of trees that were planted at the course s inception and was intended to serve as the setting for the holes and separation between them. Several of the tree masses on the course serve to separate the holes and provide attractive margins or backdrops. There is quite a bit of vegetation around the perimeter edges of the course, separating golf from residential backyards. However, there are opportunities to enhance the effectiveness of such treatments in places. There is a sense at times that the course is very much exposed to private backyards, and vice-versa. In some cases on the course, trees have been planted much too closely together, which not only compromises the health and form of the affected trees, but also voids the ground plane of air movement and much needed sunlight needed to maintain a respectable stand of grass. The result is weak turf, sparse in those areas or even bare ground. Some trees are also in poor health, and can be considered potential safety hazards if not removed. Others, meanwhile, contribute negatively to the playability of some golf holes. Keep in mind that trees alone, should not be relied upon as permanent strategic elements. To quote Golden Age architect, George Thomas (Riviera CC), Trees and shrubbery beautify the course, and natural growth should never be cut down if it is possible to save it; but he who insists on preserving a tree where it spoils a shot should have nothing to say about golf course construction. On occasion, plant or tree varieties seem in conflict they may not complement each other aesthetically or as a means of an effective course element. Such examples may be weeping willows, ornamental varieties and most non-native conifers. When we deviate from a proper plant palate, we create a visual and cultural conflict. The best way to manage the landscape on a golf course is to create a defined landscape or tree management plan for the course, 7

8 including the choices of preferred species (those that are typical and native to the area and setting), on-going care and maintenance and goals for continued effective use of plants on the course and adjoining parcels. The main purpose of the plan is to create and possess a consistent application of plant treatment guidelines that will be referred to as encountered into the future. There is an understanding that the Club is already undertaking a tree management effort at present (perhaps as part of the previous renovation plan), removing a good many of the trees that are in poor health or in some way detract from playability or the ability to grow or maintain healthy turf. Any future plans should serve as an extension of this effort, along with other valuable considerations. Along with that effort, the Club should consider the treatment of not only the golf course proper, but also the periphery, the clubhouse and parking areas and the entry treatment and experience. Outer/Native Grass Rough Areas One element that is largely absent from Cress Creek is the presence or use of native, outer rough grass applications mainly fine fescues. Sometimes people incorrectly associate this treatment as representing a links or Scottish style which is certainly not the desired character of the parkland course at Cress Creek, nor is it a correct characterization of the use and purpose of such grassing applications. The simple purpose of these native fescue areas in the outer roughs, rather, is to simply utilize low maintenance grasses in out of play or transitional areas throughout the golf course - all in an effort to reduce intensive maintenance and conserve water. The primary key in locating such areas is integrating them in out-of-theway areas that are less susceptible to playability issues resulting in frequent lost balls and slow play. In most cases, the fescue areas add an element of attractive color and texture to the course and provide another layer to the visual framework of holes more in the spirit of a traditional prairie application, but without the wildness from taller, more intrusive species. Our improvement program will examine some of the placements and use of fescue grasses throughout the course with the intent of achieving a correct balance of positively enhancing the experience within a proper and advantageous management perspective. So, for the purposes of reference, let s call these areas and applications fescue areas. A typical out-of-play area that was converted to fine fescue normal, in-season appearance. 8

9 The Course There are four sets of tees at Cress Creek, as follows: Gold 6838 yards Silver 6472 yards Bronze 6128 yards Red 5274 yards 9

10 We will examine the course lengths and the tee options available to players. In particular will be the forward set of tees, a.k.a., the red tees. At 5274 yards, the length is much greater than would be typical of a forward set of tees. Too is the focus on the bronze set, which relates closely overall to the silver tees, but marks a wide gap (nearly 900 yards) difference from the next forward set, the red. Observations and suggested refinements may be appropriate based on playability factors on certain holes, innate course characteristics and, of course, player skill levels and enjoyment. There is a realization today that there is a growing need to attract new players to the game and, consequently, new and existing members to the Club. With that, there are a variety of player types and preferences that should be accommodated as a means of addressing the long-term, family oriented vision for the Club. It should be noted that there have been some recent trials, initiated by PGA Golf Professional, Wally Hynes, to integrate alternative forward tee locations throughout the course in an effort to make the course more playable and enjoyable. The tees are of temporary variety nothing that has yet been constructed, but a worthwhile experiment to find how the holes are best set up for ALL skill levels. This sort of trial experimentation may be expanded upon in coming months so to assess further adjustments in length. Practice Facilities Cress Creek is able to offer a number of practice opportunities to the members, including a driving range, a small chipping area with a bunker, and a small putting green. All three components are limited by their size, location and configuration. Accessibility is also somewhat challenging. The main driving range has limited teeing area that receives significant use and pressure. Therefore, maintaining a healthy stand of turf is not without challenge. The length of the landing area limits players to utilize only limited flight golf balls and in some cases certain club selection limitations. Because the facilities are so near the clubhouse, there should be considerable focus given to their aesthetic appearance as well as functionality. This Master Plan will examine the weaknesses of these important practice components and begin to consider some practical solutions for their respective improvement. There is a realization today that the practice facilities are a very important selling tool among prospective new members. Clearly, the golf course remains the core asset to the Club, but when there are deficiencies with the practice facilities it can be a detriment to attracting new members. Overall Course Identity As was collectively discussed in our initial meetings, my understanding is that Cress Creek is, and always has been, a neighborhood Club experience. We see this first in the fact that it is located within an upscale residential community that is home to many of its members. Further justification is seen through the makeup of the Club s cross section of members - young families, growing families, empty nesters, retirees, and so on. Popular activities transcend beyond golf, including swimming and tennis. The Club serves its members in many ways because of its unique diversity. So, in essence, the golf course, too must at least attempt to be all things to all people in as much as one can. When we look at the golf course, we see that the layout is more or less ideally situated to fit the prescribed identity, primarily in terms of its innate characteristics. The terrain is gentle everything for the most part is easy on the eyes, neat and tidy an ideal parkland environment. Looking closer though, the course today seems to present itself more as a course trying to be something that it is not and certainly should not be more of a players course. The enhanced bunkering and characteristics, lengthy and lack of thoughtful forward 10

11 tees, limited path network and access, lack of playing options, etc. all contribute to a golf course that is aimed at a few, but tolerated by many. If we agree that the course is, in fact, intended to be well suited to a wide spectrum of playing abilities all in promotion of the Club s true identity as a neighborhood, family oriented Club, then our future actions in improving the golf experience should address this ideal very specifically, but without the any adverse impact to the overall design intent or the challenge that is available for the Club s better players. With this, understanding, we can move into the detailed portion of the Master Plan and account for each hole, in sequence, and all of the course s elements on a more individual basis. 11

12 Hole-by-Hole Remarks The following account involves unsolicited, independent, objective observations made on each hole or identified area on the course. Observations may be appealing attributes or perceived weaknesses. Following the observations, there may be an account of various considerations or suggestions for the enhancement or improvement of elements within each hole. In some cases, a summarized account of the rationale, design intent or value for the recommended improvement may follow. *Note due to the presence of heavy topdressing sand on the greens, I was unable to conduct a complete assessment of the actual green surfaces. With that, we might consider a more comprehensive review of the greens again when they are of in season condition. Hole #1 Observations A perfectly appropriate opening hole, just under 400 yards, spacious, and well-defined features. Nothing too tedious or trying. In fact, this is the sort of opening hole I like plenty of room to miss, not too penal and an opportunity to somehow run something up to the green and stay away from a big number. The hole is still, however, rather straight. Notice the ample space around the tees and the abrupt cart path alignment. For a starting hole, the tees are somewhat small and show periodic wear. The presence of the apartment complex and parking garages is a major distraction when standing on the tees and takes away from what should be an attractive, inwardly focused hole frame. The cart path at the tees ends abruptly, leaving a large wear area where all the carts exit onto the turf. 12

13 This, unfortunately, is the more focal view from the first tee. Oddly, the fairway is so straight that it fails to relate in any way to the fairway bunkers on either side of the hole. Both bunkers are instead guarded redundantly by rough. One cannot see the sand in the left fairway bunker from the tee. The green complex is quite good - well framed by bunkers with an open, ramped entry; an overall classic look. Suggested Improvements Consider moving the tees to the right by and enlarging them to provide as much as 9,000 SF as a complete tee complex. Shift the path to the right, along with the tees and extend it forward up the left side to the forward tee, then terminate the path with a gentle flare to the left. Expand/realign the fairway short of the bunkers so that the alignment extends to or near the outside limits of the sand in both bunkers. The fairway should be expansive and invite play and visibility into the bunkers rather than block access to the sand. This, along with a slightly angled tee complex, will help address the bowling alley effect. Notice how the fairway essentially ignores this bunker; a broad expanse of rough. 13

14 Hole #2 Observations After crossing the road, the conifers on the left block out the view of the tees. Conifers block the view at the tees on the left. The path does not provide any sort of convenient access to the tees. Left of the tees and extending slightly forward is a spacious area that is cared for as part of the golf course but is otherwise apparently not utilized. The fairway delineation, again, does not seem to relate to the fairway bunkering, and it is bowling alley straight. A broad area of undefined turf sort of a static looking scene. 14

15 Notice the distance of the path to the tees and the space between the two holes. Suggested Improvements Remove the conifers after the road crossing. Realign the cart path to make a turn to the left to access the tees. Continue the path to the forward tee and then tie it back in to the main shared path in the trees on the right. Consider integrating fescue grasses left of the tees and extending forward a bit and to the left margin of the hole. The high grass should not be in play. Realign the fairway to create a more strategic angle and address the relationship of the fairway to the bunkering. Remove the locust tree behind the green on the right and consider the creation of an extended collar area behind the green. 15

16 Hole #3 Observations An attractive par three hole. The path is a bit distant from the tees. Picturesque, but difficult and limited options. Notice the erosion on the banks. The pond is a prominent element though it suffers from erosion issues along the banks. A difficult hole for short hitters, including the ladies at 140 yards, as there is very little bailout area. The water does not present the most impacting hazard for most. Rather, it is the redundant bunkering beyond the water that makes things tough. The right greenside bunker blocks walking access between the path and the green. Example of the effects of water fluctuation and resulting erosion. 16

17 Suggested Improvements Create additional path that extends from the main spine path to the right edge of the tee complex. Then arc the path back to join the main spine again before the pond. Consider building a forward tee off to the right of the path, ahead. It looks as if a tee had been built here previously but was grassed over with rough. It is a much more appropriate angle for the ladies, affording them with the ability to run a shot into the green without a forced carry of water and bunkers. Alice Dye, ASGCA has long been at the forefront of looking out for the ladies in golf. She recommends that there should never be a forced carry over a hazard for the ladies that exceeds 80 yards. From the current tee, the forced carry over the pond and redundant bunker is just over 100 yards. A much better angle for the shorter hitters here. I m not a big fan of redundant bunkering where in this case, there is a carry over a pond, and then also a bunker. If you successfully negotiate the water (but still short of the green and on-line), you should be rewarded with at least a recovery from maintained turf not another hazard. In this case a bunker. I m not necessarily advocating its removal at this point, but I do suggest that we engage in discussion with the green committee regarding the validity and impact of this bunker. Make the right greenside bunker slightly smaller, keeping the same appearance and characteristics. This will contribute positively to the need for additional width for walking to and from the path and green this will help to spread that wearing of turf. Develop a plan for repairing and improving the long-term condition of the pond banks. The plan could contemplate a permanent edge treatment, like a low profile wall or more of a repair approach that will better withstand the water fluctuation that exposes the soil on the bank. 17

18 Hole #4 Observations A really nice looking hole from the tee. The bunkering layers in nicely and reveals the subtle, strategic angles that make the hole exciting and fun to play. A well-defined tee shot, but a bit snug on the right side, pinched by the trees Although the fairway bunkers are attractive and bold, they seem a bit severe (depth and face height/steepness). Example of the boldly shaped fairway bunkering. The trees on the right are really snug, which forces the fairway to also feel tight on the right. 18

19 Some trees are already being removed on the right side. The turf in the right rough is ultra thin due to shade, roots and lack of a common paved path. From the forward tee, the hole plays at 435 yards. slightly on the long side. And the carry from the tee to reach the fairway short grass is just over 70 yards. It looks as if the fairway has been shortened up at some point by 20 yards or so why? There is a small tree positioned behind the second group of fairway bunkers on the left that seems trite and misplaced singular and without purpose; distracting. There is evidence of a heavy traffic pattern near the green, on the right side. There is no path around the green. The bunkering around the green is somewhat one-dimensional; lacks any support of playing/recovery options. On the right side the bunker nearly completely blocks out foot access to the green. A large maple tree hangs over the back right edge of the green. Suggested Improvements Consider adding a new forward tee to bridge the gap to the fairway, and shorten the hole from the forward most tee to approximately 400 yards. This will lighten the carry and also the overall length of the hole. The tee should be staggered slightly to the right so to be easily accessed from the path and be out of the primary line of site from the main tees. A tree or two must be removed. Remove several more trees on the immediate right margin of the hole so that the fairway may be widened slightly and realigned in the first landing area. Consider softening the height and back face of the first fairway bunker on the left. It is only a mere 235 yards from the back tee and very much in play a difficult recovery for the shorter hitters that typically find it. Extend the path on the right to continue running through the trees; more of a continuous, joint path between #4 and #7 (like that which exists on #1/#9 and #2/#8. Remove the small tree behind the second group of fairway bunkers on the left. Consider also making those two fairway bunkers into one. The far left bunker seems somewhat detached and out of play, yet one bunker that must be cared for each day. Continue the path on the right side to access the approach and the green, before turning and accessing #5 tees. Remove the large locust in front of the right approach bunker. It s simply unnecessary and a needless redundancy. 19

20 A nice, strategic approach area. Notice the large honey locust on the right side. Worn rough in the bailout area and a large bunker. Refine the right greenside bunker to be slightly smaller, but with the same characteristics so that the front right portion of the green opens up and be accessed. Also, extend the fairway approach into the area behind the right approach bunker, so it can take advantage of the opened entry to the green on the right. This simply provides more playing options and a more attractive bailout alternative. Remove the large maples off the right corner of the green. 20

21 Hole #5 Observations There is not a path accessing the tees, which leaves the turf in weak condition from excessive wear. It appears that there was once a path next to the tee, but the landform was never regarded or buffed out. This is not an overly long hole from the forward tee, but in relation to the other tee lengths it certainly may be considered slightly out of proportion. The left fairway bunker is only marginally visible from the tees, despite its depth and bold facing. On further inspection, it is positioned quite short (due to visibility, I suspect) but only tends to catch the short hitters. It only requires a 200-yard shot from the back tee to carry it, but can be reached from the main and forward tees with shots of 165 and 125 yards, respectively. Two large trees beyond the fairway bunker, nearly completely block out any sort of aerial recovery shot toward the green. Definition is not all too apparent. A really severe bunker affects the shorter hitters, as if the trees were not enough. 21

22 There is path access on the right side of the green, but it is negated by the presence of two bunkers that nearly completely block any foot access to and from the green and path. Worn turf areas have resulted in the tiny gap between the bunkers. Notice the narrow gap between the bunkers is the main access point. Suggested Improvements Connect the path from #4 green around to the right side of the main tee complex here. Bench the path into the slope and create a low ridge along the right edge of the path to hide it from view. Continue the path forward to access the forward tee and then flare to the right toward the comfort station. Consider adding a forward tee ahead, staggered on the right side to play at roughly 270 yards in length. Consider omitting the fairway bunkering on the left. It is my understanding that Mr. Pritchard never intended for there to be any fairway bunkers in his plans, but likely opted to add this one for aesthetic purposes during construction. The bottom line is that it has little or no effect on the players that it should, simply because it is too short from the tee. Anything placed out in the main target area could not be seen because of the ridge in the fairway. There is also little need to remove the trees on the left they serve as an effective buffer at present. For the sake of definition, we might consider installing a series of small hummocks or rolls in the left rough (in place of the bunker). They will likely better define the left side through shadow facing, but would present a more recoverable obstacle for the shorter hitters versus a deep bunker. Refine the right greenside bunkers to be smaller. Retain their character but arrange them in such a manner that an egress width of 35 be created to access the green. It may be possible to consider the introduction of some fine fescue (prairie grass area) behind the green on the left. 22

23 Hole #6 Observations There is quite a gap in lengths from the main and forward tees. from 190 to 131 yards. Oddly, it looks as if there used to be a tee at approximately 160 yards. Why was it abandoned or covered over? Again, there is a forced carry over the foreground bunkering from the forward tees. In this case it is only around 70 yards. The path at the tees ends rather abruptly near the main tees. There is no other paved path on the hole. A tough, mysterious hole for the shorter hitters. Personifies the road to nowhere and why worn turf prevails in season. 23

24 Suggested Improvements Restore the old tee at 160 yards and enlarge the forward (red) tee by twice its current area. Extend the path from where it ends at the main tee. Cross it in front of the main tee to the left side so it accesses the forward tees (left of those tees). Make this a continuous path through the hole, continuing on the far, left side, to the left side of the green and around the back, then on to access the comfort station and #7 tees. Consider the integration of fescue grasses on the right margin of this hole, as a transition into the trees, tapering forward from the tees until giving way to normal maintained rough in the play area. There is also an area behind the green, on the right sort of a triangle of dead space between the comfort station and holes #5 and 6. Hole #7 Observations There is no cart path around the tees, which promotes worn areas of turf. The innermost line of trees on the right hangs out into play. Like with the previous hole, there is a sizeable gap between the bronze and red tees at 360 and 299 yards respectively. There is a lengthy, 70-yard carry to reach the fairway from the forward (red) tee. And again, it appears that the fairway was purposely shortened at some point by 25 yards or so. The tee shot is slightly void of definition, as the beginning of the fairway is not visible from the tees, much due to it s apparent shortening. Looking for definition fairway is obscured from view. Actually, there is quite a bit of unused space (maintained turf) left of the tees, extending toward the property line on the left side and back to the left side of #6 green. From the downhill slope of the fairway, the holes opens up quite attractively; well defined through bunkering. 24

25 The landform on the left side of the fairway landing area is a bit odd and protrudes into play sharply. The fairway seems unnecessarily wide in the transition area between the landing area and the approach. There is an expanse of unused area in the left rough, in the trees, to the left of the green. An attractive green complex and approach. Notice the odd point of rough on the left. Suggested Improvements Integrate a cart path at the tees, connecting with the route from #6 green. Continue the path to the left of the tees and flare it to the left beyond the forward tee. Build a new intermediate forward tee in between the existing main and forward tees, to play around 325 yards. Restore the fairway extension, back toward the tees by 25 yards. This will help lessen the carry from the tees to the fairway as well as help to present the fairway visually to the tees. Selectively remove trees along the right margin of the hole. Expand the fairway by 5-6 yards at the point where the landform and rough point out into the fairway on the left then bring the rough in by the same dimension from a point beyond the point feature, all the way to the approach. Widen the fairway on the right side by 5-6 yards from beyond the fairway bunker, all the way to the greenside bunker. Consider option of adding fescue grasses to the area left of the tees as well as in the area left of the green. These areas, if integrated properly, can add a lot of texture and color to the overall frame of the setting and also dramatically reduce the overall amount of maintained turf area. 25

26 Hole #8 Observations The back tee alternative seems very forced, awkward, inconvenient and potentially unsafe. Otherwise, this is quite an interesting par five hole. There is no cart path access to the tees. Again, there is somewhat of a gap in yardage between the main and forward tees from 465 to 414 yards. The fairway again appears to have been shortened at some point, but is now a 70-yard carry to reach from the forward tee. The first fairway bunker on the right seems to be well short mainly affecting the short hitter. Its bold face partially obscures the next bunker. There are a few odd trees that seem to crowd the left side of the hole, particularly in the landing area, opposite the bunkers. A tight landing area atop the hill, and the second, more appropriate bunker, not particularly evident. The bunkers in the foreground approach seem well placed, though their depth seems excessive (well below natural grade), making the recovery shot a difficult one. The sand in the bunkers is hardly, if at all, visible. A few trees complicate the right side of the green approach; contribute to worn turf. The cart path seems distant from the green (currently the main spine path between holes #8 and #2). 26

27 Notice the depth of the foreground bunker and the challenged turf on the right side. Suggested Improvements The back tee should be discussed in terms of its value, as well as an accessibility and safety concern. Connect a new path from #7 green, crossing directly in front of the main tee to the right side of the tees. Continue the path to the forward tee and then gently curve it to join back to the main spine path on the right. A few trees may need to be removed. Recover the fairway extension by extending back toward the tees by 25 yards. Consider adding an intermediate forward tee that will play at approximately 435 yards. Consider removing the first fairway bunker on the right. While it does tend to fit the shot from the back tee, it only penalizes shorter hitters from all other points. Its depth and bold face render it nearly inescapable for all but the better players. By removing, the visibility of the second bunker will be much more apparent and attractive as a target bunker and the fairway can be widened more appropriately short of the bunker. Selectively remove several trees in the left rough so that the arc of the fairway can be widened by 5 yards or so in the landing area. Remove two inner edge trees on the right to open the recovery and accessibility to prevent wearing of turf. Consider either filling in the foreground cross bunkers as grassy hollows or raise their sand floors by 1.5 to make them more visible and playable. On the right side of the green, consider the creation of a fairway collar extension along the right side whereby more recovery options may result. 27

28 Hole #9 Observations Potentially a much better hole and it should be. The tees are arranged somewhat chaotically, without clear purpose or direction, and they are much too small (except for the forward tee, which is oddly large in comparison). Kind of a parking lot for tee boxes and odd landscaping. Straight, un-provoking alignment and framing for what should be a very dynamic golf hole. The hole lacks any sort of strategic angles, much due to being dead straight and having a very static fairway alignment. Cart path circulation on this hole is poor from start to finish. The path does not serve the tees well, and ends abruptly (creating worn turf). The existing path is severely worn. The rough area around the forward tee drains poorly. 28

29 Left of the tees, there is an expansive area of maintained turf that is not utilized. The hole suffers from a lack of definition. The most prominent feature is the pond, but the water can hardly be seen from the tees along the ultra important right fairway margin. A large plug of dirt protrudes along the bank on the left side of the pond, which blocks the view of where the water comes into the approach. With the water being such a prominent factor on the hole, the green fails to relate to the pond at all and we see yet another redundant bunker between the water and the green. Cart circulation is complicated by the pond and by the proximity of the 10 th hole there really is no good way to access the green from the fairway landing area at present. The green more or less ignores the water and provides little opportunity for access. Suggested Improvements If there is one hole on the course that begs for more substantial improvements, it is the 9 th hole. Rearrange/rebuild the tee complex. Make them appropriately larger. Shift the back tee well to the right side to create a stronger left to right angle more strategic. Arrange the other tees in a staggered fashion, one by one to the left, whereby the angle becomes progressively less difficult and with a shorter carry to the angled fairway. Route the path to the left side of the tees out of view, but with an ideal relationship to the tees. Continue the path beyond the forward tee and wet area and then flare it into the left rough so that carts can scatter. Consider introducing fescue grasses and perhaps a few oak trees on the left side of the tees, left of the new path. The grasses can also be introduced as a foreground frame to the fairway on the right (replace the maintained, wet rough area). This will set up a more strategic carry from the back tees, which again, becomes progressively less impacting from the other tees, and not at all a factor from the forward most tees. The higher prairie grasses will also replace the need for regular mowing and other attentions in the flat, slow draining area between the tees and the fairway. To make the green, and entire hole, more dramatic and more fitting consider moving the green so that it sets hard against the water. This would be a shift of (so the hole would play at approximately 337 yards). This shift would also allow for ample space behind the repositioned green so that a path for circulation could be placed on 29

30 the left side of the approach and then circle around the back of the green without being impacted by hole #10. Instead of heavy bunkering, consider the notion of a large area of extended fairway collar surrounding the back ⅔ of the green. The angles, framing and more strategic green position will serve to transform the appearance, playability and accessibility of this hole. Hole #10 Observations If the nines were ever switched, this would make for an equally ideal starting hole as compared to #1 perhaps even better because of its slightly shorter length. As mentioned previously, the left side of the hole is very close to #9 green. There seems a wide gap between the main and forward tees, at around 45 yards. The pumphouse is in view from the tees, as is the bright, white fencing around the pool. The cart path ends abruptly near the forward tee, in clear view, and with worn turf. The fairway is rather straight in its alignment. View from the 2 nd floor terrace Also from the 2 nd floor terrace, and from the 10 th tee and putting green white fencing/pool. 30

31 There is no cart path around the green, which encourages the wearing of turf. Presently, the extensive bunkering on both sides of the green complicates access to the green. A large tree off the back left corner of the green will only continue to get larger and impact the green. The green needs to be accessed here. Suggested Improvements Consider adding a tee at a length of approximately 300 yards. Continue the path on the left of the tees, forward and to/beyond the forward tees on the left side with a flare to the left. Realign the right side of the fairway slightly so there is a slight inward arc to give the hole more of an appearance of a dogleg to the right. Do more effective vegetative screening/buffering around the pumphouse. Utilize more massing of plants that extend outward from the foundation a more natural grouping that will be more effective without calling attention to the structure. Consider also painting the building with a darker tone that will better blend into the landscape. Consider painting the pool fencing with a darker tone with a hedge buffer. Reduce the size of the left greenside bunker by ⅓ so that a path can be installed left of the green and provide efficient access. Remove the tree off the back left corner of the green. 31

32 Hole #11 Observations There is no path at the tees, though the landform suggests that one may have existed previously on the right side of the main tees. A wide gap exists between the forward and main tees at 47 yards. The fairway alignment is again, quite straight. The presence of the practice area berming can be seen and felt along the right side of the hole. The large tree on the right side of the fairway blocks out bold play. Notice the wide gap in tees, the straight fairway alignment and the tree on the right. More bold bunkering a penalty for sure, but for whom? An expanse of maintained turf area exists left of the approach and green area a triangle shaped area that is not utilized. Bunkers surround the entire green. Cart traffic tends to favor the right side of the green, which is a potentially unsafe relationship against the practice tee. 32

33 There is no cart path around the green. Suggested Improvements Consider adding a forward tee to play at approximately 290 yards and shift the existing forward tee back to play at approximately 325 yards. Stagger the tee from center to left. Install a path along the right side of the main tees, and then cross in front of the main tees to the left side, extending to the forward tees and then flare to the left. Shape a very low ridge (less than 1 in height) along the right side of the path at the main tees. This will serve to obfuscate the tee as viewed from #10. Consider realigning the fairway so that a slight angle is created from right to left remove the large tree on the left corner (near the fairway bunker) and extend the fairway to be a much wider, enticing strip right of the bunker to turn the hole. Increase the buffering along the right side of the hole to disguise and block out the practice area berming. Install a path that picks up on the left side of the approach (in the trees) and continues along the left side of the green, around the backside and then continues to provide access to #12 tees. Consider the fescue grass concept in the large, out of play area left of the approach and green. Make the left, front greenside bunker smaller by ⅓ to open up access for foot traffic to the green from the path. 33

34 Hole #12 Observations There is an absence of a path for the carts at the tees. Maintained turf around the tees, and to the right, is largely out of play and without use. The tees feel like they are in competition with the practice tee they are in close proximity with open viewing. Another odd gap between some of the tees with over 70 yards separating the silver and bronze tees, and nearly 40 yards between the bronze and red tees. The fairway bunker face on the right is extremely high; blocks out views down right side; rather forbidding. More odd gaps between the tees, and a tight landing area. A rather crowded relationship. 34

35 There are a number of trees throughout the hole that impact playability and crowd play. Trees are tight against beginning of the fairway on the left. Several trees around the right fairway bunker negate that hazard. Another large tree overhangs the approach on the right side. There is worn turf right of the green due to the absence of a cart path. Another attractive green complex. Notice the lack of path, effect of trees, etc. Access to the green and on to the next teen is mainly here. Suggested Improvements Continue the path from #11 green, gently curving it to access the front of the main tee. Then, turn it left to access the forward tees from the left side and flare it to the left beyond the trees. Look at increasing the buffer landscaping behind the tees, against the practice tee. Also consider integrating some prairie grass around the tee complex and to the right margin, in open area shared with #13. 35

36 Consider building an intermediate tee for the silver/bronze players at approximately 370 yards. Lower the top horizon line of the fairway bunker slightly to make the bunker less formidable with more ability to see beyond its position. Selectively remove trees in the left rough, near the beginning of the fairway, again to the right of the fairway bunker and in the right approach. Also remove a small bunker on the backside of the left approach bunker. Extend the path back into the right approach (with a flare to the right) so that it picks up carts much sooner. Consider making the right greenside bunker slightly smaller, by ⅓, to open up the walkon access to the green on that side. Hole #13 Observations Path does not really access the tees, and ends abruptly, short of any forward tee positions. There is a 135-yard carry from the bronze tee to the fairway. And an 80-yard gap between the bronze tee and the red tee. Fairway bunkering offers a bold appearance from the tee, but what are the options? Carrying those cross-bunkers with a tee shot is something only the longest hitters might, if ever, consider. Laying up is the only consideration for the majority of players which leaves a lengthy, blind shot to the green. There is a wide gap of rough beyond the cross bunkers before turning to fairway. A single tree beyond the right cross-bunker seems to discourage the most aggressive line of play. Lots of eye appeal, but no options. Notice the broad gap between tees and the long carry. 36

37 Another path that leads to nowhere and leaves behind a worn scar. Views of the maintenance area dominate the left side of the hole, and from other vantages on the course. In fact the cart path that is utilized is a shared path within the maintenance area. There is no cart path access around the green, which leads to worn turf areas and traffic patterns. The line of arborvitae bushes behind the green (along the practice tee) dominates the backdrop, like a line of soldiers. There seems to be an open area of maintained turf right of the approach, between holes #12 and 13 A relationship that must be improved. Notice also the shrubs behind the green. 37

38 Suggested Improvements Extend the path from #12 green to run alongside the main tees on their right side, crossing over beyond the main tee to the left. Continue the path on the left of the forward tee(s) and flare into the left rough. Remove at least one crabapple tree. Remove two crabapple trees right of the forward tee. Consider adding an intermediate tee (could be the bronze tee) at 360 yards and pushing the red tee forward to play at 290 yards. This would allow more opportunities for not only reaching the fairway, but also negotiating the cross hazards for a much less difficult approach shot. Selectively thin trees between holes #12 and #13 for better light penetration, improved air circulation, healthier overall turf and general appearance. Consider making the left cross-bunker smaller by ⅓ to ½ (keeping the far left portion intact or even removing it completely. Then saddle out the area between the left and center bunkers so that enough width exists here to see through and down the hole and fairway can be connected. This will also provide a much more considerable option for the shorter hitters still a risk, but one with a realistic reward. Expand the fairway toward the cross-bunker on the high side to provide more reward to players who carry those bunkers. The width of rough only serves to catch or slow down shots that have otherwise successfully negotiated the hazard. Remove the lone oak behind the right fairway bunker. Widen the strip of rough along the maintenance area path on the left by Make the fairway inwardly focusing and create enough width so that a buffer/hedge can be created along this edge to block out both views and the access to maintenance area. Extend the berm on the left side (from the grassy hollow support) back along the maintenance path. This will discourage carts trying to take this route around the green. Pick up a path in the right rough, adjacent to the approach and carry it around the right side of the green (keeping low, at-grade) and then connect it behind the green with the path going to #14 tees. Consider integrating fescue grasses in the void area right of the approach, below #13 tees. Also consider alternative plant use in achieving separation between holes #12, #13 and the practice tee. Use open space where width exists to implement more human scale massing of native shrubs plants with more massing appeal that will fit. Even from #14 tees, there is a need to make this view go away. 38

39 Hole #14 Observations Overall, this is a very likeable hole and potentially an even more attractive setting. Seems like the shorter version of hole #3. While the carry distances are not too bad for the shorter hitters, there is still very little bailout area and very little chance of running a shot into the green due to extensive bunkering. Potentially a really great setting. Still a difficult hole for the short hitters. The only other detraction on this hole is the surroundings the distractions that are presented by the views of the cars, tennis courts, dumpster and noisy parking areas on both sides of the hole. Parking lot, maintenance equipment, dumpster and tennis courts all in view. 39

40 There is a large ash tree between the path and the green. It is in poor condition and will only get worse with ash decline due to the emerald ash borer. The tree causes shade issues as well as traffic channeling/worn turf. View from the green, directly at tennis courts and parking lot. Suggested Improvements Consider making the right greenside bunker smaller by ⅓, closing in the left side to open up more width in front of the green. Seriously enhance the setting by enclosing this corridor with plant materials. Ensure that the plants and their spacing completely block out views to the parking lots on both sides, including the maintenance area. Remove the large ash tree right of the green. The right side of the green and the parking lot and the large ash tree. 40

41 Hole #15 Observations Nice to see the removal of the willows along the pond only one or two more to go. Amazing how nice the view of the pond can be! There is much turf wearing at the end of the cart path. The alignment and length of the path promote wearing of turf. There are a few trees scattered throughout the hole that adversely impact the playability and appearance of the hole. The third fairway bunker on the left is positioned in such a way that it pinches down the fairway against the pond. It is an odd bunker placement, discourages strategic options. Notice the placement of the left fairway bunker directly opposite the water hazard. 41

42 A rather long hole from the forward tees at 518 and 447 yards, respectively. The path at the green/next tee is a mess. As positioned, the access to the green is limited and shared by the 15 th tee, along with trees and a major drainage swale. The green features some odd contouring not consistent with the other greens on the course. There are limited cupping areas. A poorly developed access point for both holes. Suggested Improvements Remove the remaining willows around the pond. Consider building a new bronze tee to play at 475 yards, and moving the red tee forward to play at 410 yards. Extend the cart path on the left side to access the forward tees on the left side before flaring into the left rough. Selectively remove several trees, including a Norway maple at the beginning of the fairway on the left, two oaks on the right beginning of the fairway and a tree next to the second fairway bunker on the left. Relocate the third fairway bunker on the left, shifting it back by roughly 35 yards. This will open up more strategic playing options in the approach and not create such a narrow pinch near the pond. Pick up a new cart path in the left rough, in the approach. Continue the path around the back of the green and tie into a new path alignment at #16 tees. As you begin to plan for longer-term improvements and course renovations, a primary consideration will likely involve the greens. At such time, thought should be given to the redesign of this green to make it a more reasonable and efficient putting surface. 42

43 Hole #16 Observations As at #15 green, the path continues to be a major concern here at the tees. The path is much too small, shares use with #15 and is complicated by trees and poor drainage. The path fails to provide access to the forward tee. A path, trees, and drainage swale, all shared by a green and tee. Notice several of the trees that obscure and the influence of the path. 43

44 There is a 60-yard gap between the bronze and red tees. A small pine leans into the hole on the right, forward of the main tees. The same is true of a deciduous tree further ahead in the right rough it obscures some of the view into the right bunker. The approach is an attractive one as the bunkering is bold. The green area suffers from having worn turf much due as a result of having no cart path and too many trees. The left greenside bunker also contributes to the wearing of turf by forcing foot traffic around the front to enter the green. Trees and a bunker impede access here and weaken the turf. Suggested Improvements Remove the large locust tree on the right side of the tees it is in poor health and complicates use of this area. Consider shifting the alignment of the tees by to the right, allowing for more space on the left side between the tees and the property line. Utilize this width to route the path to the left side of the tees to the high, more visible and accessible side. Then restore the slope between the tees and #15 green as more playable turf. Consider building an intermediate (bronze) tee at 355 yards. Continue the path on the left side to access the forward tees and then flare into the left rough. Remove the pine and one other tree in the right rough between the tees and the fairway. At the green, flare a path in from the far left rough, behind the large bunker/mound complex on the left. Continue the path toward the left side of the green and then turn it to access the tee complex for #17. Several trees should be removed to make way for the path, and to also open the area up for light penetration that will produce healthier turf. To aid in providing good access to the green from the path, consider making the left greenside bunker smaller by ½ (removing the front portion) to create more open access to the front left of the green. Alternatively, remove the bunker entirely and replace with a fairway collar extension along the entire left edge of the green. 44

45 Hole #17 Observations Overall, a pretty solid hole. Tees seem to be spaced ok, with some balance in length. Several maples in the left rough tend to pinch the corridor a bit, as felt from the tees. The area left of the tees (a broad, partially wooded area) is an expanse of maintained turf that is not serving any particular purpose. The left side of the foreground bunker is poorly tied in where the rough and fairway margins come together. Poor drainage and challenging mowing results. Overall, a pretty attractive hole. Suggested Improvements Remove the two maples on the left. Consider using a fescue grass application in the large void area on the left side. Repair the margin of the right bunker, perhaps making it slightly smaller by ⅛ on the left side. Provide just a slightly wider window of potential run-up for the shorter hitters. 45

46 Hole #18 Observations Another very straight, static feeling hole from the tees. The bunkers define the hole well, but they are extreme in their character very deep and steep, hardly recoverable for most. The fairway can better define this tee shot, minus a few trees. An example of the steep, bold, fairway bunkering. 46

47 Two crabapple trees block out the scattering of carts where the path crosses the bridge. There are a number of random trees throughout the hole that detract block views, too close to play, etc. The left side of the green area is worn due to absence of a path. Suggested Improvements Remove the two crabapple trees (where path exits the bridge) to allow the scattering of carts and prevent concentrated wearing of turf. Remove 2-3 crabapple trees on the left beginning of the fairway to open up views. Remove two trees short of the fairway bunker on the right. Improve the fairway alignment by adjusting the line toward the left bunker more of a long angle alignment. Do the same on the right. Space is created by removing the small trees, as mentioned above. Lower the faces of the fairway bunkers and consider lifting the floors with the resulting fill material. Remove one tree short of the left bunker in the approach. Consider removing one or both of the large maples in the right approach. The trees are so large that they stymie the development of strategic options and visibility in the approach. The absence of at least one of the trees might expose the aesthetic view of the other while allowing for more space to expand the fairway so the existing condition (break in the fairway) might be alleviated. The strategy and development of the approach can make this hole more dynamic. 47

48 A tighter view of the approach where the fairway is terminated. Widen the fairway approach into the area vacated by the large maples and then make the center bunker smaller by ½. There should be enough width here to have a fairway connection. The present treatment (broad rough strip separation) does not promote strategic play and options. Integrate a path on the left side of the approach, just beyond the left bunker. Continue the path along the boundary to the street. 48

49 Practice Areas Putting Green Observations The current putting green is between 7500 and 8000 square feet not substantial in size but ample if properly managed. It could benefit from being slightly larger. It is positioned directly behind the clubhouse, next to the 10 th tee. The pool rests hard against the east side of the green, including bold, white fencing. It seems that views into the pool are rather welcomed. A flagpole is positioned just in front of the green, near the path. There is no apparent cart parking dedicated for the putting green. Suggested Improvements A more detailed study should be conducted for the practice areas, in general. Consideration should be given to making the putting green slightly larger, to handle some of the stress and impacts that result from the heavy outing traffic and regular pressures with being so accessible. Improve the overall environment around the putting green, including the dulling/buffering of the pool and associated fencing. Is the green fitting into the space efficiently? And the prominence of the fence. Short Game Area Observations Currently a very small, provisionary facility at best. There is a very short fairway approach and a severely eroded bunker not at all in character with those on the course. There really is no proper target green. Accessibility to the area is compromised by the putting green, pool and hole #10. 49

50 I am told that this area receives very little use, probably because of its accessibility and for lacking any realistic golf course characteristics. View of putting green and chipping area from the terrace and the pool. The chipping area is not really fully developed as a proper short game area. Suggested Improvements Again, a more detailed study of this area should be conducted. The placement of a new target green should follow a safe and accessible arrangement whereby shots (not exceeding yards) will not face the pond, the pool or the putting green, if at all possible. Shots exceeding this type of length will result in heavier 50

51 devoting and excessive pitch marks on the greens. So, the length need not be excessive as those shots can be provided for on the main practice area. As with the putting green, there is a need here to also address the aesthetics of the pool and fencing as well as any other safety or visual considerations, through vegetative buffering and hedging and perhaps the color of the fencing. Main Practice Area Observations The practice tee is reasonable accessible from the club area by a dedicated path. Cart parking is limited and rather haphazard near the tee. There are two main tee decks the upper is approximately 135 x 20 (2,700 SF) and the lower deck is 180 x 100 (18,000 SF). Additionally there are 13 all weather, synthetic tee positions on a concrete pad in back of the upper tee. Given the limited grass teeing area, it is reasonable to expect that the synthetic tees receive a good bit of use throughout the year. The elements seem somewhat haphazardly developed and aligned. There are three target greens, each guarded by two, flat and rather mundane bunkers. Measured from the center of the lower tee, they are positioned at 85, 120 and 175 yards respectively. The overall length of contained landing area is approximately 260 yards. A pond borders the entire left side of the fairway landing area. Limited flight golf balls are utilized. How many are lost in the water each year? 51

52 Again, alignment, target area development and perhaps some proper parking would be an improvement. Suggested Improvements As with the putting green and short game area, I recommend that a more in depth study of the practice area be considered. The plan should address a few key areas: o Expansion of the main tee. o Location and development of the landing area, including more strategic positioning of defined target greens/fairway. Diverting from the water is a consideration as well. o Improved aesthetics and vegetative containment around the perimeter to enclose the area. o Provide a more suitable and efficient means for parking carts. 52

53 Random Comments In no particular order some general thoughts and considerations that might not have come up in the hole-by-hole assessment. Flags Consider using only solid, red flags. Your course currently uses white flags. Solid red flags present the most effective contrast against the green tones on the golf course. The singular color will also promote a cleaner, classier look. The existing white flags can get lost against the sky or gaps between background trees. Trees We all love and appreciate trees and they are, by nature, a prominent aspect of the framework at Cress Creek, but there is also a realization that there is a limited need for trees on a golf course. Famous golf course architect, Harry Colt referred to trees as an obnoxious hazard, and Donald Ross said of trees,. as fond as you and I are of them, we still must not lose sight that there is a limited place for them in golf. So, I recommend an approach whereby we can acknowledge where trees may present any adverse affect on play, safety, aesthetics or unreasonably complicate the maintenance of healthy turfgrass. In such cases, their presence should be challenged. It should be a consideration, moving forward, to develop an overall Tree Management Plan for the course one that identifies the purpose of trees on the course, a list of acceptable, fitting varieties and some basic standards for the planting or removal of trees. The plan should also address the matter of memorial trees and the use of ornamental plants and flowers on or near the course. Rough We have not addressed much the issue of maintained rough in the report, but there is acres of primary rough grass currently being maintained at Cress Creek at present. Which to assume is the fact that the majority of that acreage receives regular watering through irrigation, plus fertilization and disease prevention practices, perhaps some seasonal aerifying and overseeding and of course, regular mowing. That overall area number (70-80 acres) rates as 53

54 average to slightly over average, though nothing to get too alarmed about. However, for the reasons just listed, the rough still requires a good bit of regular maintenance and care. If that overall number can be effectively reduced in a way that befits the course (but does not compromise playability or aesthetics, etc.) then it is certainly worth considering. The most effective way to reduce these areas is through turf conversion from a maintained area to a less intensive application, like fine fescue or as we have described previously in this report prairie grasses. This can be done in out-of-play areas, shoulder transition areas, embankments and around tees. The key is to work to identify potential areas and then create a plan for their installation or periodic conversion. When complete, then the Club may start to realize certain efficiencies in the maintenance program that will allow for greater focus of work and resources in other areas of the course. Materials Though not exactly considered a golf course matter in the normal sense, the use of various construction materials can have an effect on the visual aesthetics of the course. Materials such as wood timbers, railroad ties, various types of stone or rock, building siding or roof treatments, pathway materials, curbing, sand, and so on, should be selected in promotion of their practical use, longevity and consistent appearance. It is wise to keep the palate simple (like with trees and plants) and true with a theme that is repeated throughout the course. When inconsistencies become noticeable, they become a perceived detraction to the quality of the course and surrounding environment and a departure from any perceived theme or identity. Course Accessories With respect to tee stations, less is more the simpler, the better. Simple tee markers, ball washer, trash can, and an occasional bench or water cooler. Develop a clean, simple theme. The arrangement should be understated and not in any way a distraction just like with the flags. There should be an effort to avoid planting flowers (like annuals and showy perennials) in beds around the tees they mostly only add more need for maintenance and regular attentions and end up creating wear patterns and long term replacement/upgrade costs. Aside from being a little out of place, they must always look good if they don t, then it is an instant eyesore and point of contention. The Topic of Strategic Golf I have mentioned in these pages many times about strategy and about options, angles and choices. I wish only to say that golf holes are much more enjoyable and provoking when these elements are successfully employed. When holes are straight and direct, they become onedimensional and boorish. When we study great architecture and the very best golf courses in the world, we find a common constant in that there are multiple ways to play holes, and there are cause and effect elements. There are matters of judgment and creativity, and all applicable only to one s own golf game. The best strategic holes are not only the most fun to play; they are the fairest and yet often the most testing under pressure in medal play. A hole need not be complicated in order to have options in fact, the choices should be clearly defined and simple to see and consider. Too much in modern golf architecture relies on elements of drama rather than the appreciation of subtlety. The mastery of the latter produces the greatest joy and the most well rewarded golf shots. As quipped by the great Bobby Jones, we want our golf courses to make us think. However much we may enjoy whaling the life out of the little white ball, we soon grow tired of playing a golf course that does not give us problems in strategy as well as skill. 54

55 A Shorter Course The current tees at Cress Creek were laid out during the renovation. At that time, there seems to have been a particular focus on the back tees a course that was mainly engineered for the skilled player. In this plan, we have presented a case for improving the forward set (amazingly long at 5274 yards), and in some cases the intermediate tees (which are currently set at a lengthy 6128 yards). The forward-most set, we have found, should be more in the range of 4600 yards or more appropriately figured against the typical driving distance for the user/player from that given tee. The suggestion is in accordance with guidelines from the PGA and USGA initiative called Tee it Forward. This certainly begs some additional discussion with the golf committee, which may lead to a plan that considers the adding or repositioning of tees for the added enjoyment of the golfers at Cress Creek or even a set of less defined/constructed tees that is available for juniors. Some of those adjustments are already recommended as part of this assessment. It is important to consider that the women are not the only players who use the forward tees, and by building a shorter set, the current forward tees therefore become more attractive to some senior players and junior players. The variety will be welcomed and will send the message to the members that the Club does indeed care about their enjoyment. 55

56 Irrigation System The irrigation system, while one of the most important aspects of golf course maintenance tools, is likely the most underappreciated resource of those not directly involved with the maintenance team. The irrigation system represents approximately ⅓ of the initial course construction budget/investment and it has a life span of between years, depending on a multitude of factors. It s an under the hood item and should always be in top running condition. To date, the system at Cress Creek seems to be plugging along, having been upgraded in 2005, has good control and the complement of an abundance of suitable, quality water. So while the irrigation system is currently in good order, it is one of the most valuable, and costly infrastructures at Cress Creek today. It is not a matter of if the system will become antiquated; rather, it is when. I urge the leadership of the Club to plan accordingly for its replacement or upgrades in the future. 56

57 Summary and Conclusions As we initiated this study, our focus was intent on gathering information that would lead us to some logical conclusions and a practical way forward. There is some accent on the word, practical, as there is an understanding that future improvements should be considered judiciously, with efficiency and value guiding their acceptance. Our collective goal is to acknowledge that Cress Creek is a desirable, family oriented facility; has a course that is favorable, but can be reasonably improved through measures that are uncomplicated and achievable within the context of the golf course as it exists today. We also highlighted a need to understand and consider the current difficulty of the course for a variety of skill levels and a range of playability factors that affect the speed of play and the way the course is experienced. Among the design considerations, we examined ways to create more strategic options as well as a variety of recovery alternatives. And with all future improvements, the results should yield a result that is ultimately more playable, more enjoyable, more manageable and practical to incorporate. We referred to a need to examine the practice facilities for their character, use, accessibility, efficiency and effectiveness as a part of the golfer experience at Cress Creek. As part of that examination, one recommendation was to isolate the practice facilities in terms of creating a separate study one that offers solutions in greater detail. The guiding elements of the collective solution base were predicated on following a consistent vision and supporting a proper identity for the course. We considered that after the recent renovation, that vision might have been flawed in some way or a bit too one-dimensional. But through study of the course and collective discussions with the leadership, we identified a fitting identity for the future. one that is simple and innate to uphold and one that will produce a much more appropriate experience for the future. On that note, let s move along to highlight some of our conclusions and identify some priorities to consider as the Club moves forward. Difficulty and Playability We identified the more difficult holes for the various players skill levels as well as the course elements that contribute to that cause on a hole-by-hole basis. While there are some isolated tough spots throughout the course, most of the contributing factors were consistently present throughout the holes and were identified as such. Among the corrective recommendations were: adding forward tees, realigning/repositioning tees to present an improved strategic angle, or adjusting the tee positions to create a more appropriate length of hole for a given skill level or to be a better fit given particular hole characteristics. There is consideration given to removing several bunkers, softening the facial characteristics or depth and making some slightly smaller. We also identified that the fairway areas at Cress Creek are in accordance with other courses of similar character in the area and in comparison to most courses in general. However, there are opportunities to widen or extend fairways in some places to address specific strategic needs and to expand bailout options around some greens. 57

58 Strategic Options and Recoveries Bobby Jones once said, I know of nothing so dull as the hole which is played straight away from tee to cup, regardless of how many cross bunkers are put in the way. Such a hole can be made difficult but never interesting, for the playing of it can never involve the least bit of strategy. So, when we think about strategy, we consider the factors that influence the way we approach play the proper line, club selection and shot type. We look to understand our options where trouble lurks or where we might choose to boldly attack or maybe where it is best to miss. There are many influencers to strategy, many of which are innate to the course (such as water, trees, slopes, etc.). There are other elements present on the course that we can refine or modify to affect strategy; like the presence of rough or short grass, bunkers or placing tees at distances or angles that beg a player to ponder. Among the recommended solutions include the realignment of some fairways (to present the holes as less static, straight tests) and the simple refinement of some bunkers. We have also looked to incorporate more options for players throughout the course, where there might have been only a direct line of play existing and with refinement, there may be a choice of two or even three lines to consider. There can be a less direct route that does not spell disaster, rather an area where a player can lay back (at the cost of a half stroke) and still have a chance to recover with a successful following shot. That is particularly true on several of the par three holes. In looking specifically at the green complexes, the recovery opportunities around the greens are rather one-dimensional (basically deeper rough and bunkering immediately adjacent to and around most of the greens). A more varied approach, involving strategic extensions of the bentgrass collars would invite more playing options; alternatives around the greens to get up and down with more personal preference and creativity rather than having to hit the same lob wedge shot every time. Strategic options afford players with choices choices that may induce a produce a variety of results.less of an all or nothing approach. A More Enjoyable Experience Anytime we can improve a hole in some way or make it more playable, some net enjoyment effect can be anticipated. This is not always recognized solely through lower scores (though many times it is!), but also in the appearance of the hole, the time it normally takes to play the hole, the perceived difficulty of a hole and also it s conditioning. Being enjoyable can also translate differently to the cross section of players. When we consider the more skilled players, we find that they gain the greatest enjoyment in the challenge of a hole the test, if you will. This group also appreciates a well-conditioned presentation of the turf, consistent bunkers, speedy greens, etc. Another way to inject fun into the course is to offer a greater variety of shot options, considering in particular those opportunities around the greens. So the rub lies in how we package the design and presentation of the course to appeal to all players and in essence, make golf more fun. We have identified ways in which a more enjoyable experience can be achieved through refinement by: Selectively removing trees Adding, relocating and realigning tees Adjusting the lengths of some holes from certain tees 58

59 Creating wider landing areas and broadening some fairways Opening some approaches and creating collar extensions around greens Selectively repositioning or eliminating bunkers to be more strategic and playable Defining measures that will help to improve turf conditions Identifying opportunities to improve aesthetics and appearance Acknowledging an identity and incorporating a consistent treatment throughout Providing better access throughout the course And so on Continue to reinforce the Club s image. 59

60 Course Element Conclusions Greens The majority of the greens are in reasonably good order at Cress Creek. We identified several areas, such as hole #15 and a few others where the extension transitions have done nothing to create additional pinnable areas and frankly, display awkward and abrupt transitions. These areas should be considered when the greens are planned for reconstruction or alternatively when they are disturbed for resurfacing. The greens are originals, with push-up style construction and no internal drainage. Over time, the lack of drainage can cause building up of organic matter as well as compaction, so they need to be monitored closely. The green surrounds have been considered, as previously outlined with some less intensive bunkering, more surface area for access and also the introduction of bentgrass (fairway) collar extensions that will further enhance the recovery options, bail-out opportunities and overall creativity around the greens. Tees Most of the tees at Cress Creek are in good order, as they were reconstructed during the project. However, there are some that are a bit too small and a few complexes where, if refined, will render much more complete and functional service. We have also noted a number of tees to be added (in relation to providing a more accommodating length or strategic tee position), some to be shifted/realigned and a few are to be considered for a more complete redesign approach (i.e. #1, #9, #15 etc.), as mentioned above. Practice Facilities An area where improvements will produce significant results for the members and for the attraction of new members. A separate study should be engaged to study how these areas can be arranged, enlarged, defined, accessed and beautified. Bunkers The recommendations for the bunkering are somewhat more subjective than other elements on the course at Cress Creek. This is the case mainly because of the extensive redesign work that was executed in We have noted the overall impact that the bunkers can have on the facility, in terms of playability, playing strategy, aesthetics, drama and appearance and of course, maintenance some of which (but not all) were considered during the renovation. A quick tally of the existing bunkers at Cress Creek reveals that there are currently 93 bunkers which is an increase from the original prior to the renovation in Taking into account all of the recommendations included herein that total could potentially go down by a few, but in general, there is no suggestion for dramatic alteration of the bunkering beyond making a few smaller and perhaps slightly shallower (less forbidding) and softer faces among some of the bunkers. The overall impact would be quite minimal from the playing side as the approach would be to simply to make the bunkers more integral, purposeful and strategic and also easier to access and maintain. 60

61 A weak bunker face and sand being exposed to soil. It has been noted that of all the impacts on the maintenance side at Cress Creek, the bunkers require the most effort and time by the staff. Some of the steep banks are difficult to maintain, and south-facing slopes can deteriorate in the hot sun. Sometimes the slopes need to be resodded. We have noted that there are no liners in the existing bunkers (that prevent erosion and protect sand from contact with subsoil contamination) and the sand is of marginal quality (poor physical and aesthetic conditions). This should be given some consideration in the short term, as the sand will only continue to deteriorate. Reference the Golf Course Life Cycle chart on page 65 for a better understanding of the life span of a bunker. Fairways We outlined previously that there are approximately 30 acres of fairways at Cress Creek, which is just about ideal. Most of the fairways fit nicely within their corridors at an ample, playable width. That being said, the plan contemplates some expansion and realignment of the fairways, for both playability and strategic purposes. Some of the holes will present much better and more clearly if the fairways are refined slightly. Other situations exist where the fairway/feature relationships are not quite integral but are easy to remedy. And, we have noted where the carry from some of the tees to the fairway is far too long. Again, these are simply solved. The main concern regarding the fairways, however, is the challenge in maintaining the many varieties of grass that are present. Clearly, it is desirable on many levels to have a consistent, monostand of bentgrass. As that conversion is planned, the realignments and extensions can be very simply incorporated and marked out by the golf course architect at that time. As with any turf conversion, there should be consideration given as to the down time associated with the installation there will be a period of time where play will be limited likely in a Fall season. Perhaps 9 holes in the Spring and 9 in the Fall. Options do exist, but there should be expectation for the course to be at least partially closed for enough time to execute the seeding and grow-in/maturation. Otherwise, the course will continue to feature fairways that are lacking in their appearance, and in their health. 61

62 Rough and Outer Native Rough We addressed the near roughs earlier in this text, and there s hardly more to mention. Some of the design refinements will benefit the near roughs in some areas where excessive wearing is present and where trees complicate the conditions. The native roughs (or prairie grass areas), though, deserve some future consideration. Fine fescues (and other low-profile prairie-like varieties) are very effective in transitioning maintained/irrigated turf into the outer margins of holes, and for use in out-of-play areas, slopes, banks and around tee complexes. These grasses provide an attractive aesthetic treatment with their colorful contrast and textural qualities they are a nice complement to native or natural edges, in broad areas between holes, and along hole margins for impressive framing. Fine fescues are not completely maintenance free turf grasses, but they don t require regular mowing, and watering, which is a worthwhile consideration when looking to trim the budget. A number of these areas and applications have been proposed among the hole improvements herein. Paths and Bridges On a surface level, the most important aspect of paths and bridges is to stay on top of their condition. They do have a life span, and it is prudent to plan accordingly for repairs and replacement of these infrastructural elements. That all being said, we have studied in some greater detail (on this and previous occasions) how the paths can be greatly improved. For whatever reason, it seems that the notion of the golf cart was given very little consideration during the recent renovation as if the golf cart did not exist. Today, we are left with the task of not only admitting that the golf cart is an integral part of how Cress Creek functions today and very much here to stay, but also in making proper accommodations for its use throughout he golf course. This plan outlines where paths should be positioned, their specific locations, extensions, and realignments, all in an effort to improve not only their condition, but also the health and appearance of the turf surrounding the paths and the way the paths provide access throughout the course. The exit point of this path has only this small bit of surface area concentrates the wear. 62

63 Path is too narrow and poorly aligned. Notice the measures being taken to shore up the turns. The current asphalt paths are deteriorating at a fast pace and they are too narrow at only 7 in width. An 8 width will provide much more surface area and will negate the wearing in the edges and inside turns. I understand that the Club is considering a new path material application a crushed granite treatment. I have seen this used at other area facilities with success, provided that the installation is done properly. Example of newly installed crushed granite paths a nice touch. 63

64 Water Features With a name like Cress Creek, I keep looking for the creek!! There is one on #18, but apparently not the one the Club is named for. There are also man made ponds on holes #3, #8, #9, between #10 and the practice area, #14 and #15. For the foreseeable future, the main focus with these ponds should be in maintaining consistent water levels as much as possible and to identify solutions that will shore up the lake banks. As stated earlier, the primary cause for the bank erosion is the fluctuation of the water levels. Clearly, a new treatment for the banks should be explored. Example of erosion conditions along the pond banks. Life Cycle of a Golf Course For a better understanding of the life cycle of various golf course items and elements, see the table below (following page). Our allied golf organizations got together on estimating the life expectancy of a golf course, for the purpose of assisting clubs like Cress Creek in assessing their long range planning needs. We have come to some conclusions already in this assessment that are backed up by this table. For a reminder, Cress Creek was built in That s 50 years of maturation, wear and tear, influence from Mother Nature, architects and golfers! 64

65 65